Re: Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

[Santiago Ruano Rincón]

Hi,

El 14/08/24 a las 10:17, Jean-Pierre Giraud escribió:
> Hello all.
> Le vendredi 09 août 2024 à 15:01 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit :
> > Dear Teams,
> > 
> > I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really
> > sorry
> > if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I
> > would like to be sure the infrastructure is ready for it. Is there
> > anything required so we (LTS Team) can upload to bullseye-security
> > since next Thursday (August 15th)?
> > 
> > Webmaster Team: I guess https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ is ready
> > for processing new DLAs (giving there was one in July 1st). Could you
> > please confirm that is the case?
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> >  -- Santiago
> Could you confirm that it is time to publish the news about Bullseye
> becoming LTS?
> 
> I will wait your approval.

Yes, please!

Merci,

 -- Santiago


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

[Jean-Pierre Giraud]

Hello all.
Le vendredi 09 août 2024 à 15:01 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit :
> Dear Teams,
> 
> I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really
> sorry
> if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I
> would like to be sure the infrastructure is ready for it. Is there
> anything required so we (LTS Team) can upload to bullseye-security
> since next Thursday (August 15th)?
> 
> Webmaster Team: I guess https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ is ready
> for processing new DLAs (giving there was one in July 1st). Could you
> please confirm that is the case?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
>  -- Santiago
Could you confirm that it is time to publish the news about Bullseye
becoming LTS?

I will wait your approval.

Kinds regards

Jean-Pierre Giraud
Publicity Team




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello all

El 9 de agosto de 2024 20:01:35 CEST, "Santiago Ruano Rincón" 
 escribió:
>Dear Teams,
>
>I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really sorry
>if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I
>would like to be sure the infrastructure is ready for it. Is there
>anything required so we (LTS Team) can upload to bullseye-security
>since next Thursday (August 15th)?
>
>Webmaster Team: I guess https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ is ready
>for processing new DLAs (giving there was one in July 1st). Could you
>please confirm that is the case?
>

There shouldn't be any problem in this area. In any case, I will keep an eye 
when the next advisories are announced, to ensure everything works as expected.

Kind regards

Laura Arjona Reina


>Thank you,
>
> -- Santiago

Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

[Santiago Ruano Rincón]

Dear Teams,

I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really sorry
if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I
would like to be sure the infrastructure is ready for it. Is there
anything required so we (LTS Team) can upload to bullseye-security
since next Thursday (August 15th)?

Webmaster Team: I guess https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ is ready
for processing new DLAs (giving there was one in July 1st). Could you
please confirm that is the case?

Thank you,

 -- Santiago


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: new redirects for www.d.o/security and www.d.o/lts/security

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi Thomas,

On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:06:58AM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we now redirect all DSA/DLA URLs under security and lts/security with
> or without having the year in the path and with or without a version
> to their announcement mail:
> Examples:
> /security/dsa-5576
> /security/2023/dsa-5576-2
> lts/security/2023/dla-3686-1
> lts/security/dla-3686
> 
> All URLs like dsa-5576-2 or dla-3686-1 are redirected to the specified
> versions of the DSA. A URL containing only a DSA/DLA number but no
> version currently redirect to version -1. In the future it may
> redirect to the most recent version.
> All redirects are not case sensitive.

Thanks a lot for your great work and invested time on this topic!

> @security-tracker admins:
> A page like https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-5576
> redirects to
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-5576-2
> On this page you have a link to the "Source  Debian" which is a link to
> https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5576.
> Currently this is a wrong link to dsa-5576-1.
> 
> The easiest way would be to make the "Source Debian" links always
> redirect to the announcement number including the version, but without
> the year. So for
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-5576-2
> change this link to
> https://www.debian.org/security/DSA-5576-2
> similar for the DLAs and so on.

Thanks, will look into it and see that we can align as well those and
make the adjusted reference in the tracker.

Regards,
Salvatore

new redirects for www.d.o/security and www.d.o/lts/security

[Thomas Lange]

Hi all,

we now redirect all DSA/DLA URLs under security and lts/security with
or without having the year in the path and with or without a version
to their announcement mail:
Examples:
/security/dsa-5576
/security/2023/dsa-5576-2
lts/security/2023/dla-3686-1
lts/security/dla-3686

All URLs like dsa-5576-2 or dla-3686-1 are redirected to the specified
versions of the DSA. A URL containing only a DSA/DLA number but no
version currently redirect to version -1. In the future it may
redirect to the most recent version.
All redirects are not case sensitive.


@security-tracker admins:
A page like https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-5576
redirects to
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-5576-2
On this page you have a link to the "Source  Debian" which is a link to
https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5576.
Currently this is a wrong link to dsa-5576-1.

The easiest way would be to make the "Source Debian" links always
redirect to the announcement number including the version, but without
the year. So for
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-5576-2
change this link to
https://www.debian.org/security/DSA-5576-2
similar for the DLAs and so on.

-- 
regards Thomas

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Thomas Lange]

>>>>> On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:37:57 +0100, Hans Fredrik Nordhaug 
>>>>>  said:

> Hi! 
> This looks great, but it would be nice if the list of "Recent Advisories" 
(dsa.list) was translated - maybe using PO files?
> Currently the entries are untranslated. Example:

> [24 Dec 2023] T  DSA-5588-1 putty security update

> It would be nice if the date was translated and the common categories 
like "security update".

Since 2015 we only use "security update" as a common category for
almost all advisories. Here are some numbers
- 1700 x security update, 6 other categories for the DSAs
- 2504 x LTS security update and 12 others for the DLAs

In the end we would have a localized date, but the interesting
information of the advisory itself would still be in english.
It's not worth spending time into this effort and it would make
many things much more complicated.

I also think that automatic translation software nowadays can
translate the date including the name of month easily and even
translating the advisory shouldn't be hard.

--
best regards Thomas

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Hans Fredrik Nordhaug]

Hi!

This looks great, but it would be nice if the list of "Recent Advisories"
(dsa.list) was translated - maybe using PO files? Currently the entries are
untranslated. Example:

[*24 Dec 2023*] T DSA-5588-1 putty *security update*

It would be nice if the date was translated and the common categories like
"security update".

Regards, Hans

man. 25. des. 2023 kl. 22:33 skrev Thomas Lange :

> Hi all,
>
> as announced on Dec 7th, I have now removed the old index.wml files
> and renamed new.wml to index.wml in the webwml repository under
> security/ and lts/security/.
>
> =
> IMPORTANT
> =========
> Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare
> a .wml and .data file for each advisory.
> Please stop creating those files for new advisories.
> =
>
> For the translators:
> Please stop translating old advisories.
> We still have to adjust the translation headers because of the
> renaming from new.wml to index.wml.
>
> A hint for the languages which did not had a translation for new.wml
> until now. Here are some more infos, how I created the new.wml files:
>
>   english/security/new.wml is a copy of english/security/index.wml with
> some changes.
>   You will see the change history (including a rename from dsa.wml to
> new.wml) by
> $ git log -p --follow 3160b3931961~1.. index.wml
>
>   For lts/security/new.wml use
> $ git log -p --follow a1010f1cb6fd~1.. index.wml
>
>
>
> I still need to do some cleanup and check if everything works.
> The new index.wml files are not yet created yet but this will be done
> in the next hours.
>
> --
> best regards Thomas
>
>

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> as announced on Dec 7th, I have now removed the old index.wml files
> and renamed new.wml to index.wml in the webwml repository under
> security/ and lts/security/.
> 
> =
> IMPORTANT
> =
> Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare
> a .wml and .data file for each advisory.
> Please stop creating those files for new advisories.
> =
> 
> For the translators:
> Please stop translating old advisories.
> We still have to adjust the translation headers because of the
> renaming from new.wml to index.wml.
> 
> A hint for the languages which did not had a translation for new.wml
> until now. Here are some more infos, how I created the new.wml files:
> 
>   english/security/new.wml is a copy of english/security/index.wml with some 
> changes.
>   You will see the change history (including a rename from dsa.wml to 
> new.wml) by
> $ git log -p --follow 3160b3931961~1.. index.wml
> 
>   For lts/security/new.wml use
> $ git log -p --follow a1010f1cb6fd~1.. index.wml
> 
> 
> 
> I still need to do some cleanup and check if everything works.
> The new index.wml files are not yet created yet but this will be done
> in the next hours.

Thanks for all your work on this front.

Regards,
Salvatore

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Sylvain Beucler]

Hi,

On 26/12/2023 11:12, Holger Levsen wrote:

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 10:56:56PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:

 > what do we need to do instead? :)
Nothing in the webwml repository.
The list of recent advisories on the web pages is now automatically
generated from the data from the security tracker.
It's important that the announcement mail is sent and that those lists
are updated:
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/raw/master/data/DSA/list
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/raw/master/data/DLA/list
That's all.


ah, very nice! & thanks for clarifying too!


https://lts-team.pages.debian.net/wiki/Development.html updated :)

Cheers!
Sylvain Beucler
Debian LTS Team

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Holger Levsen]

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 10:56:56PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> > what do we need to do instead? :)
> Nothing in the webwml repository.
> The list of recent advisories on the web pages is now automatically
> generated from the data from the security tracker.
> It's important that the announcement mail is sent and that those lists
> are updated:
> https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/raw/master/data/DSA/list
> https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/raw/master/data/DLA/list
> That's all.

ah, very nice! & thanks for clarifying too!


-- 
cheers,
Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

The devel is in the details.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Thomas Lange]

>>>>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 21:24:19 +, Holger Levsen  
>>>>> said:

> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
>> Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare
>> a .wml and .data file for each advisory.
>> Please stop creating those files for new advisories.

> what do we need to do instead? :)
Nothing in the webwml repository.
The list of recent advisories on the web pages is now automatically
generated from the data from the security tracker.
It's important that the announcement mail is sent and that those lists
are updated:

https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/raw/master/data/DSA/list
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/raw/master/data/DLA/list

That's all.
-- 
regards Thomas

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Holger Levsen]

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare
> a .wml and .data file for each advisory.
> Please stop creating those files for new advisories.

what do we need to do instead? :)


-- 
cheers,
Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Klimakatastrophe bedeutet kompletter sozialer Kollaps.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Thomas Lange]

Hi all,

as announced on Dec 7th, I have now removed the old index.wml files
and renamed new.wml to index.wml in the webwml repository under
security/ and lts/security/.

=
IMPORTANT
=
Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare
a .wml and .data file for each advisory.
Please stop creating those files for new advisories.
=

For the translators:
Please stop translating old advisories.
We still have to adjust the translation headers because of the
renaming from new.wml to index.wml.

A hint for the languages which did not had a translation for new.wml
until now. Here are some more infos, how I created the new.wml files:

  english/security/new.wml is a copy of english/security/index.wml with some 
changes.
  You will see the change history (including a rename from dsa.wml to new.wml) 
by
$ git log -p --follow 3160b3931961~1.. index.wml

  For lts/security/new.wml use
$ git log -p --follow a1010f1cb6fd~1.. index.wml



I still need to do some cleanup and check if everything works.
The new index.wml files are not yet created yet but this will be done
in the next hours.

-- 
best regards Thomas

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Thomas Lange]

>>>>> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:27:24 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez 
>>>>>  said:

    > At what point should the LTS team stop generating these? Is that
> something that we should discontinue right away, or do wait for a formal
> announcement to let us know that these should no longer be generated
> when a DLA is released?
I will announce this to both security teams after I did the change. So
please continue preparing the .wml and .data files until you'll get
the "Stop" from me.

-- 
regards Thomas

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Roberto C . Sánchez]

Hi Thomas,

[I changed lts-secur...@debian.org to debian-...@lists.debian.org since
lts-secur...@debian.org is meant only to reach members of the team
approved to deal with embargoed issues. It is not a public list like
debian-...@lists.debian.org.]

I read through this message and I am very excited about the coming
changes.

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> in the past, all security related lists (like the N recent security
> advisories, crossreferences, RSS feeds, OVAL) were using the .wml and
> .data files which exists for each DSA and DLA. These two files are
> still created manually for each DSA and DLA.
> 
> After talking to the security team, my goal is to remove the need of
> this manuall work and generate all information automatically from the
> primary security sources from the Debian Security Tracker. This also
> makes the security information more early available to our users
> without waiting for someone to prepare the .wml and .data files.
> 
> 
> The changes will affect the webwml repository under /security/ and
> /lts/security/.
> 
Our workflow for LTS still includes manual generation of .wml and .data
files, as you note. As this is a step in the process which presents an
opportunity make mistakes, I am pleased that this is being automated.

At what point should the LTS team stop generating these? Is that
something that we should discontinue right away, or do wait for a formal
announcement to let us know that these should no longer be generated
when a DLA is released?

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez

upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

[Thomas Lange]

Hi all,

in the past, all security related lists (like the N recent security
advisories, crossreferences, RSS feeds, OVAL) were using the .wml and
.data files which exists for each DSA and DLA. These two files are
still created manually for each DSA and DLA.

After talking to the security team, my goal is to remove the need of
this manuall work and generate all information automatically from the
primary security sources from the Debian Security Tracker. This also
makes the security information more early available to our users
without waiting for someone to prepare the .wml and .data files.


The changes will affect the webwml repository under /security/ and
/lts/security/.


What's already done

- The new lists of DSA/DLA are currently available under
  https://www.debian.org/security/new.html#DSAS
  https://www.debian.org/lts/security/new.html#DLAS

  The two new.html pages will replace the current index.html pages
  https://www.debian.org/security/index.html  and
  https://www.debian.org/lts/security/index.html

- The new list of recent security announcements now includes a
  link to the security tracker and the original announcement
  mails. The later link is a complete new feature of the web pages.

- The RSS security feeds for DSA and DLA are not generated from the
  .wml/.data files any more but using our new script mk-dsa-dla-list.
  The RSS content now includes a link to the security tracker and to the
  announcement mail.
  Since the change on Nov 16th we did not get any complaint about this.

- The OVAL files are generated without using the .data and .wml files.
  We now parse DebianSecTracker.json and /data/DSA/list from the sec-tracker
  Thanks to Carsten for implementing this. The OVAL XML files have now
  less errors but still aren ot perfect, because they never included
  information from DLA for older releases.

- A new collection of sources of security information
  https://www.debian.org/security/new.html#infos
  including examples how to access DSA, DLA and CVE information.


TODO:

- security/new.wml and lts/security/new.wml will replace the corresponding 
index.wml
- we need more translations for these two new wml files (hints for
  translators see below)
- The crossreferences will be removed an can easily replaced by using
  data/DSA/list which is easy to parse and read.

- Create new apache redirects. Currently we have
  www.d.org/security/dsa- (only lowercase)
  to www.d.o/security//dsa-
- Currently there's no similar redirect for the DLA
- NEW redirects
  redirect www.d.org/security/dsa- to the announcement mail at
  lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce//
  A script for generating the map file already exists.
  We will do this also for the DLA.

- all security//, key-rollover/ and undated/ files will be removed
- We will keep 2020-GRUB-UEFI-SecureBoot/ and 2021-GRUB-UEFI-SecureBoot/
- No more translations of security advisories are needed
  In 2023 only we had only french translations of the DSA/DLA. No
  other language did any translation of these information in 2023.
  French indeed translated ALL DSA/DLA. Wow!
  Thanks a lot to the french translators for this great work.
- We will keep the sec announcements and translations of 2023 for
  another 6 month before deleting them.
  Older translations will be removed in a few weeks after all changes
  were made.

- The translators are asked to prepare security/new.wml
  and lts/security/new.wml for their language. We will remove the old
  index.wml for languages which do not provide translations for the
  new pages.

  Here are some more infos, how I created the new.wml files:

  english/security/new.wml is a copy of english/security/index.wml with some 
changes.
  You will see the change history (including a rename from dsa.wml to new.wml) 
by
$ git log -p --follow 3160b3931961~1.. new.wml

  For lts/security/new.wml use
$ git log -p --follow a1010f1cb6fd~1.. new.wml



A side effect of the removal of the thousands of DSA/DLA will be that
our search engine will present better results. For e.g. if you search
for "security AND tracker" most results (of the 2000) are links to DSA
and DLA, but no information about our security tracker.
another e.g. for bad search result: "firefox" the first 10 hits you get are DSA 
from 2005 to 2007
another e.g.: search for "gnome" will list a lot of old DSA for icewaesel, 
icedove and other packages

If you have any comments, feel free to contact me.

-- 
best regards Thomas

Re: LTS

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 1:47 PM The7up wrote:

> This is standing in LTS index page:

Please discuss this with the LTS team on their list:

https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Contact#debian-lts

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

LTS

[The7up]

Hi All!

This is standing in LTS index page:

"Thus the Debian LTS team takes over security maintenance
of the various releases once the Debian Security team stops its work."

I think it should be deceptive/unclear some of readers,so we should change
it to:

Thus the Debian LTS team takes over security maintenance
of the various releases under Long Term Support.

(At the first sentence explain, Debian Security not handling releases under
LTS.)

Zibi



<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Mentes
a vírusoktól. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Bug#973544: marked as done (www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:21:02 +0100
with message-id <0ad1b906-3f85-d914-7de2-a65d80561...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS 
links to wrong locations
has caused the Debian Bug report #973544,
regarding www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
973544: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Debian LTS Security Advisories RSS (https://www.debian.org/lts/security/dla)
links to wrong locations.

For example:

> https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dla-2425"; />

It should be https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2020/dla-2425 .


Regards,
Nobuhiro Ban
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Sylvain

Thanks!
I have merged it, saw that one of the links produced in the dla-long RSS
feed didn't contain the prefix and committed

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/499ed4920757c2057b614a49b816f500d9ea12a5

to add it.

I think this is fixed now, it will be online in the next hours.

Thanks a lot everybody!

Kind regards,

El 2/11/20 a las 16:22, Sylvain Beucler escribió:
> Hi Laura,
> 
> Here's a pull request for your consideration:
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/566
> 
> I didn't switch to get_recent_security_list_rdf() because 'dsa.rdf.in'
> (non-LTS/DSA) doesn't use it either. Instead I handled the LTS case in
> get_recent_list()/grab_titles().
> 
> Cheers!
> Sylvain
> 
> On 01/11/2020 21:13, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>> Hi Nobuhiro Ban,
>>
>> Thanks for reporting this issue.
>>
>> The build of those RSS feeds is done via the get_recent_list() function
>> in the recent_list template:
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/template/debian/recent_list.wml
>>
>>
>> However, that function is not prepared for security advisories in other
>> path different than www.debian.org/security.
>>
>> In any case, I see that other security lists now call to a different
>> (improved) template:
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/template/debian/recent_list_security.wml
>>
>>
>> But I couldn't find the correct way to call the function
>> get_recent_security_list_rdf so it creates the RSS feed.
>>
>> CC'ing the debian-lts mailing list for the case they can have a look.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> El 1/11/20 a las 16:40, Nobuhiro Ban escribió:
>>> Package: www.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Dear Maintainer,
>>>
>>> Debian LTS Security Advisories RSS
>>> (https://www.debian.org/lts/security/dla)
>>> links to wrong locations.
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>>> https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dla-2425"; />
>>>
>>> It should be https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2020/dla-2425 .
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nobuhiro Ban
>>>
>>

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona--- End Message ---

Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations

[Sylvain Beucler]

Hi Laura,

Here's a pull request for your consideration:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/566

I didn't switch to get_recent_security_list_rdf() because 'dsa.rdf.in' 
(non-LTS/DSA) doesn't use it either. Instead I handled the LTS case in 
get_recent_list()/grab_titles().


Cheers!
Sylvain

On 01/11/2020 21:13, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:

Hi Nobuhiro Ban,

Thanks for reporting this issue.

The build of those RSS feeds is done via the get_recent_list() function
in the recent_list template:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/template/debian/recent_list.wml

However, that function is not prepared for security advisories in other
path different than www.debian.org/security.

In any case, I see that other security lists now call to a different
(improved) template:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/template/debian/recent_list_security.wml

But I couldn't find the correct way to call the function
get_recent_security_list_rdf so it creates the RSS feed.

CC'ing the debian-lts mailing list for the case they can have a look.

Kind regards,

El 1/11/20 a las 16:40, Nobuhiro Ban escribió:

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Debian LTS Security Advisories RSS (https://www.debian.org/lts/security/dla)
links to wrong locations.

For example:


https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dla-2425"; />


It should be https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2020/dla-2425 .


Regards,
Nobuhiro Ban

Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi Nobuhiro Ban,

Thanks for reporting this issue.

The build of those RSS feeds is done via the get_recent_list() function
in the recent_list template:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/template/debian/recent_list.wml

However, that function is not prepared for security advisories in other
path different than www.debian.org/security.

In any case, I see that other security lists now call to a different
(improved) template:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/blob/master/english/template/debian/recent_list_security.wml

But I couldn't find the correct way to call the function
get_recent_security_list_rdf so it creates the RSS feed.

CC'ing the debian-lts mailing list for the case they can have a look.

Kind regards,

El 1/11/20 a las 16:40, Nobuhiro Ban escribió:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> Debian LTS Security Advisories RSS (https://www.debian.org/lts/security/dla)
> links to wrong locations.
> 
> For example:
> 
>> https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dla-2425"; />
> 
> It should be https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2020/dla-2425 .
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Nobuhiro Ban
> 

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations

[Nobuhiro Ban]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Debian LTS Security Advisories RSS (https://www.debian.org/lts/security/dla)
links to wrong locations.

For example:

> https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dla-2425"; />

It should be https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2020/dla-2425 .


Regards,
Nobuhiro Ban

Bug#922246: marked as done (www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:27:00 +
with message-id <20191212162700.7pkc6jsxhwjf5...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, 
only that last one shows up in indexes
has caused the Debian Bug report #922246,
regarding www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows 
up in indexes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
922246: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=922246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: www.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org


Hi,

this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new /lts/security/ area:

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> >> * The /lts/security//index.*.html files show the last advisory for
> >> the cases where there are several files with the same beginning (e.g.
> >> for DSA- and DSA--2, both html files are generated, but the
> >> index only points to the -2 file). If this is not the intended
> >> behaviour, changes in index.wml and Makefiles are needed.
> > I think we want the other DLAs linked from the indexes as well.
> > shall we file a bug to not forget this?
> I looked into this, and couldn't figure it out.
> Please do file a bug for now, I have no idea how to fix this...

done :)


-- 
tschau,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:41:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Holger Levsen  writes:
> > awesome, merged, thank you! Do you think we can close this bug now?
> Fine with me...

doing so, after confirming the fix is on www.d.o :)


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

[Brian May]

Holger Levsen  writes:

> awesome, merged, thank you! Do you think we can close this bug now?

Fine with me...
-- 
Brian May 

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Brian,

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 05:09:42PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May  writes:
> > Is it OK if we simply delete this line?
> Done by https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/298

awesome, merged, thank you! Do you think we can close this bug now?


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

[Brian May]

Brian May  writes:

> Is it OK if we simply delete this line?

Done by https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/298
-- 
Brian May 

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

[Brian May]

Brian May  writes:

> When I just tested it I found that the index contains entries for both
> files, however the DSA--2 entry is incorrectly titled as DSA- instead
> of DSA--2.

Actually it looks like this was deliberate.

The file template/debian/recent_list_security.wml has the function
get_dsa_data which contains the line:

$title =~ s/(D[LS]A-\d{2,})-\d{1}/$1/; # strip off the revision in the DSA 
number

I haven't tested it yet, but to me it looks like if I delete this line
it will do the right thing.

Is it OK if we simply delete this line?

Will double check this tomorrow.
-- 
Brian May 

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

[Brian May]

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> * The /lts/security//index.*.html files show the last advisory for
> the cases where there are several files with the same beginning (e.g.
> for DSA- and DSA--2, both html files are generated, but the
> index only points to the -2 file). If this is not the intended
> behaviour, changes in index.wml and Makefiles are needed.

Hopefully I attributed this correctly. Apologise if I got it wrong.

When I just tested it I found that the index contains entries for both
files, however the DSA--2 entry is incorrectly titled as DSA- instead
of DSA--2.
-- 
Brian May 

Bug#925266: marked as done (two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:50:30 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#925266: fixed in odb-api 0.18.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #925266,
regarding two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 
8.11.0 for the rest)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
925266: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: content lts
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org

Hi all
Install media version 8.11.1 has been created for Jessie LTS
architectures only, so we need to keep on offering 8.11.0 images for the
non-LTS arches (currently we have broken links for mips, mipsel,
powerpc, ppc64el and s390x because they point to non-existent 8.11.1
images).

I have created a branch including the needed tags to offer the correct
images for each architecture:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/tree/jessie-8.11.0-and-8.11.1

and a merge request:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/81

I have built in local and it seems everything is correct. Attached you
can find the result.

There is a little more work to do, though:

* Explain more clearly in
/english/releases/jessie/debian-installer/index.wml that 8.11.1 is only
available for LTS arches.

* The result (attached) is a bit ugly, IMO, with 2 rows of links to
images for each type. I couldn't find the way to put all the
architectures in the same row. I tried to add some label "LTS" and "non
LTS" but I only succeeded in displaying those in a row *after* the list
of links, so I didn't like it either.

Please comment on this, if you think it's ready to merge I would merge
it soon. If I get no comments in one week or so, I'll count it as it's
ok and merge it.

Kind regards

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Title: Debian -- Debian “jessie” Installation Information 





   
   
  
   
	
		
		

			
			
		
		
	   
  


Skip Quicknav

   About Debian
   Getting Debian
   Support
   Developers' Corner

 
Debian Releases
 / Debian “jessie” Release Information
 /
Debian “jessie” Installation Information
 


Installing Debian 8.11
Debian 8 has been superseded by
Debian 9 (stretch). Some of these
installation images may no longer be available, or may no longer work, and
you are recommended to install stretch instead.


To install Debian 8.11
(jessie), download any of the following images (all i386 and amd64
CD/DVD images can be used on USB sticks too):



	netinst CD image (generally 150-280 MB)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




	full CD sets
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x


	full DVD sets
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




CD (via BitTorrent)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x


DVD (via BitTorrent)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




CD (via jigdo)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x


DVD (via jigdo)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




Blu-ray (via jigdo)
i386amd64source


other images (netboot, flexible usb stick, etc.)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386mipsmips64elmipselppc64els390x




If any of the hardware in your system requires non-free firmware to be
loaded with the device driver, you can use one of the
tarballs of common firmware packages or download an unofficial image including these non-free firmwares. Instructions how to use the tarballs
and general information about loading firmware during an installation can
be found in the Installation Guide (see Documentation below).



netinst (generally 240-290 MB) non-free
CD images with firmware
amd64i386




Notes



	For downloading full CD and DVD images the use of BitTorrent or jigdo
	is recommended.

	For the less common architectures only a limited number of images
	from the CD and DVD sets is available as ISO file or via BitTorrent.
	The full sets are only available via jigdo.

	The multi-arch CD images support i386/amd64; the installation is similar to installing
	from a single architecture netinst image.

	The multi-arch DVD image supports i386/amd64; the
	installation is similar to installing from a single architecture full
	CD image; the DVD also includes the source for all included packages.

	For the installation images, ver

Bug#925266: two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest)

[Steve McIntyre]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:14:04AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 00:28 +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>> Package: www.debian.org
>> User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertag: content lts
>> Severity: normal
>> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>> 
>> Hi all
>> Install media version 8.11.1 has been created for Jessie LTS
>> architectures only, so we need to keep on offering 8.11.0 images for the
>> non-LTS arches (currently we have broken links for mips, mipsel,
>> powerpc, ppc64el and s390x because they point to non-existent 8.11.1
>> images).
>[...]
>
>Sorry about that.  I don't think we should continue to link to
>unsupported images, but I now see that we still have installer pages
>for all releases that used d-i.  In my commit
>0a388832cb4a7e9dfe1265fa04d1c441e9730e23 I intended to remove the non-
>LTS arches from the page, but that obviously didn't work.

ACK. I agree with you. At the very least, we should make it less easy
for people for find links to unsupported installation media.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten." -- Malcolm Ray

Bug#925266: two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest)

[Ben Hutchings]

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 00:28 +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertag: content lts
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> 
> Hi all
> Install media version 8.11.1 has been created for Jessie LTS
> architectures only, so we need to keep on offering 8.11.0 images for the
> non-LTS arches (currently we have broken links for mips, mipsel,
> powerpc, ppc64el and s390x because they point to non-existent 8.11.1
> images).
[...]

Sorry about that.  I don't think we should continue to link to
unsupported images, but I now see that we still have installer pages
for all releases that used d-i.  In my commit
0a388832cb4a7e9dfe1265fa04d1c441e9730e23 I intended to remove the non-
LTS arches from the page, but that obviously didn't work.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered
an expert.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#925266: two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest)

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Package: www.debian.org
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: content lts
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org

Hi all
Install media version 8.11.1 has been created for Jessie LTS
architectures only, so we need to keep on offering 8.11.0 images for the
non-LTS arches (currently we have broken links for mips, mipsel,
powerpc, ppc64el and s390x because they point to non-existent 8.11.1
images).

I have created a branch including the needed tags to offer the correct
images for each architecture:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/tree/jessie-8.11.0-and-8.11.1

and a merge request:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/81

I have built in local and it seems everything is correct. Attached you
can find the result.

There is a little more work to do, though:

* Explain more clearly in
/english/releases/jessie/debian-installer/index.wml that 8.11.1 is only
available for LTS arches.

* The result (attached) is a bit ugly, IMO, with 2 rows of links to
images for each type. I couldn't find the way to put all the
architectures in the same row. I tried to add some label "LTS" and "non
LTS" but I only succeeded in displaying those in a row *after* the list
of links, so I didn't like it either.

Please comment on this, if you think it's ready to merge I would merge
it soon. If I get no comments in one week or so, I'll count it as it's
ok and merge it.

Kind regards

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Title: Debian -- Debian “jessie” Installation Information 





   
   
  
   
	
		
		

			
			
		
		
	   
  


Skip Quicknav

   About Debian
   Getting Debian
   Support
   Developers' Corner

 
Debian Releases
 / Debian “jessie” Release Information
 /
Debian “jessie” Installation Information
 


Installing Debian 8.11
Debian 8 has been superseded by
Debian 9 (stretch). Some of these
installation images may no longer be available, or may no longer work, and
you are recommended to install stretch instead.


To install Debian 8.11
(jessie), download any of the following images (all i386 and amd64
CD/DVD images can be used on USB sticks too):



	netinst CD image (generally 150-280 MB)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




	full CD sets
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x


	full DVD sets
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




CD (via BitTorrent)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x


DVD (via BitTorrent)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




CD (via jigdo)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x


DVD (via jigdo)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386sourcemulti-arch
mipsmipselpowerpcppc64els390x




Blu-ray (via jigdo)
i386amd64source


other images (netboot, flexible usb stick, etc.)
amd64arm64armelarmhfi386mipsmips64elmipselppc64els390x




If any of the hardware in your system requires non-free firmware to be
loaded with the device driver, you can use one of the
tarballs of common firmware packages or download an unofficial image including these non-free firmwares. Instructions how to use the tarballs
and general information about loading firmware during an installation can
be found in the Installation Guide (see Documentation below).



netinst (generally 240-290 MB) non-free
CD images with firmware
amd64i386




Notes



	For downloading full CD and DVD images the use of BitTorrent or jigdo
	is recommended.

	For the less common architectures only a limited number of images
	from the CD and DVD sets is available as ISO file or via BitTorrent.
	The full sets are only available via jigdo.

	The multi-arch CD images support i386/amd64; the installation is similar to installing
	from a single architecture netinst image.

	The multi-arch DVD image supports i386/amd64; the
	installation is similar to installing from a single architecture full
	CD image; the DVD also includes the source for all included packages.

	For the installation images, verification files (SHA256SUMS,
	SHA512SUMS and other) are available from the same directory as the
	images.


Documentation

If you read only one document before installing, read our
Installation Howto, a quick
walkthrough of the installation process. Other useful documentation includes:


Jessie Installation Guide
detailed installation instructions
Debian-Installer FAQ
and Debian-CD FAQ
common questions and answers
Debian-Installer Wiki
community maintained documentation

Errata

This is a list of known problems in the installer shipped with
Debian 8.11. If you have experienced a problem
installing Debian and do not see your problem listed here, please send us an
installation report
describing the problem or
check the wiki
for other known problems.

Errata for release 8.11

 pkgsel does not install updates with ABI changes (by defaul

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

[Holger Levsen]

package: www.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org


Hi,

this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new /lts/security/ area:

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> >> * The /lts/security//index.*.html files show the last advisory for
> >> the cases where there are several files with the same beginning (e.g.
> >> for DSA- and DSA--2, both html files are generated, but the
> >> index only points to the -2 file). If this is not the intended
> >> behaviour, changes in index.wml and Makefiles are needed.
> > I think we want the other DLAs linked from the indexes as well.
> > shall we file a bug to not forget this?
> I looked into this, and couldn't figure it out.
> Please do file a bug for now, I have no idea how to fix this...

done :)


-- 
tschau,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

[Laura Arjona Reina]

El 10/11/18 a las 22:55, Laura Arjona Reina escribió:

> 
> For the website, I have created the merge request with a proposal:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/40
> 
> (I'm attaching the diff too).
>

Sorry, I forgot the attachment.
Kind regards

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
diff --git a/english/releases/jessie/debian-installer/index.wml b/english/releases/jessie/debian-installer/index.wml
index 70c6d2b3ba7..b53aaa6022a 100644
--- a/english/releases/jessie/debian-installer/index.wml
+++ b/english/releases/jessie/debian-installer/index.wml
@@ -156,6 +156,24 @@ for other known problems.
 
 
 ## Translators: copy/paste from devel/debian-installer/errata
+
+Errata for release 8.11
+
+
+ pkgsel does not install updates with ABI changes (by default)
+
+ Bug https://bugs.debian.org/908711";>#908711:
+ during installation with network sources enabled, the
+ installed security updates don't include updates that depend on a new
+ binary package, due to a kernel or library ABI change.
+
+  Status: This has been fixed in the installer included
+ for newer releases (Debian 9 stretch). For Debian 8 installations, since no new
+ Debian installer is provided, security updates that depend on new packages
+ should be installed manually, by running
+ apt-get upgrade --with-new-pkgs after the first install and reboot.
+
+
 Errata for release 8.0
 
 

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

thanks for your work on documenting how to install jessie these days!

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:23:45PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I assume this is going to appear at
> .  That seems
> a fairly prominent place, though the errata are quite a way down the
> page so may be missed.
 
speaking of stuff which might be missed: 
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/debian-installer/ has a prominent
note (marked with a red icon) saying/starting with: "If any of the
hardware in your system requires non-free firmware to be loaded with the
device driver..."

I think it would be great if "Debian 8 has been superseded by Debian 9
("stretch")..." could have such a red warning icon as well!


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 22:55 +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hello all
> 
> El 9/11/18 a las 2:50, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> > I recently discovered a bug in the installer (#908711).  During
> > installation with network sources enabled, security update are normally
> > installed.  However, this didn't include updates that depend on a new
> > binary package, due to a kernel or library ABI change.
> > 
> > I fixed this bug in unstable and in a stable update that will be
> > included in Debian 9.6.  However, since there are no stable updates
> > during the LTS period, this bug will remain unfixed in the installer
> > for jessie.
> > 
> > I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation 
> > steps to install the missed upgrades.  However, I wonder whether it
> > would be helpful and possible to update the release notes or other
> > official documentation at this stage?
> > 
> > Ben.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for reporting.
> 
> For the website, I have created the merge request with a proposal:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/40

I assume this is going to appear at
<https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/debian-installer/>.  That seems
a fairly prominent place, though the errata are quite a way down the
page so may be missed.

> (I'm attaching the diff too).
> 
> Comments and/or improvements very welcome (CC'ing debian-boot). If there
> is no activity, I plan to merge this in a week or so.
> 
> Respect to the release notes, I'm not sure if this documentation should
> go there and in which section specifically (CC'ing debian-doc for help).

Since the release notes are mostly concerned with upgrades, and this
doesn't affect upgrades, I now think this may not be worth doing.

Ben.

> We have fixed our cron script for publishing the release notes against
> git (thanks  Baptiste Jammet, and sorry for the delay!) and this means
> that if a patch is accepted in the jessie branch of the release notes
> (https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/ ), it will be
> published in the website too (we will build jessie release notes for the
> website at least until the LTS support finishes).
> 
> Kind regards
-- 
Ben Hutchings
Kids!  Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous.  Do not attempt it
in your own home. - Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, `Good Omens'



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello all

El 9/11/18 a las 2:50, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> I recently discovered a bug in the installer (#908711).  During
> installation with network sources enabled, security update are normally
> installed.  However, this didn't include updates that depend on a new
> binary package, due to a kernel or library ABI change.
> 
> I fixed this bug in unstable and in a stable update that will be
> included in Debian 9.6.  However, since there are no stable updates
> during the LTS period, this bug will remain unfixed in the installer
> for jessie.
> 
> I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation 
> steps to install the missed upgrades.  However, I wonder whether it
> would be helpful and possible to update the release notes or other
> official documentation at this stage?
> 
> Ben.
> 

Thanks for reporting.

For the website, I have created the merge request with a proposal:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/40

(I'm attaching the diff too).

Comments and/or improvements very welcome (CC'ing debian-boot). If there
is no activity, I plan to merge this in a week or so.

Respect to the release notes, I'm not sure if this documentation should
go there and in which section specifically (CC'ing debian-doc for help).

We have fixed our cron script for publishing the release notes against
git (thanks  Baptiste Jammet, and sorry for the delay!) and this means
that if a patch is accepted in the jessie branch of the release notes
(https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/ ), it will be
published in the website too (we will build jessie release notes for the
website at least until the LTS support finishes).

Kind regards
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

[Holger Levsen]

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 01:50:48AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation 
> steps to install the missed upgrades.  However, I wonder whether it
> would be helpful and possible to update the release notes or other
> official documentation at this stage?
 
I think your LTS/Installing page is fine (and nice work there, thanks!) - in
general we encourage to install stable, so IMHO we dont need to provide
updated images... that said: i dunno if anyone expressed demand.


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

[Ben Hutchings]

I recently discovered a bug in the installer (#908711).  During
installation with network sources enabled, security update are normally
installed.  However, this didn't include updates that depend on a new
binary package, due to a kernel or library ABI change.

I fixed this bug in unstable and in a stable update that will be
included in Debian 9.6.  However, since there are no stable updates
during the LTS period, this bug will remain unfixed in the installer
for jessie.

I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation 
steps to install the missed upgrades.  However, I wonder whether it
would be helpful and possible to update the release notes or other
official documentation at this stage?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power.  France is bacon.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#822956: marked as done (www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Jun 2016 19:16:50 +
with message-id 
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by holger-guest fixes #822956
has caused the Debian Bug report #822956,
regarding www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
822956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be
added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish
translation to be forwarded to l10n-spanish.

Cheers,

Santiago
>From d3d3cf8548fbc011e81a9365fcf25ef9461729e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Santiago=20Ruano=20Rinc=C3=B3n?= 
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:19:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] releases/wheezy/index.wml: wheezy benefits from LTS

---
 english/releases/wheezy/index.wml | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml b/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml
index 01ac7d5..452073f 100644
--- a/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml
+++ b/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ the Release Notes.
 # Security updates have been discontinued as of <:=spokendate('XXX'):>.
 
 
+Wheezy benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) from 26 April 2016
+until 31 May 2018. The LTS is limited to i386, amd64, armel and armhf. For more
+information, please refer to the https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki.
+
+
 To obtain and install Debian, see
 the installation information page and the
 Installation Guide. To upgrade from an older
-- 
2.8.1

>From c2b54a08623d8f20646bcd7d0fa5b167df83e6a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Santiago=20Ruano=20Rinc=C3=B3n?= 
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:21:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml: wheezy benefits from LTS

---
 spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml | 8 +++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml b/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml
index 9a3fd3b..ca95a50 100644
--- a/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml
+++ b/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml
@@ -20,7 +20,13 @@ en las Notas de Publicación.
 Debian 8.0 (jessie).
 # Las actualizaciones de seguridad han dejado de proporcionarse el <:=spokendate('XXX'):>.
 
- 
+
+Wheezy beneficia de soporte a largo plazo («Long Term Support», LTS)
+desde el 26 de abril de 2016 hasta el 31 de mayo de 2018. Wheezy LTS está
+limitado a i386, amd64, armel y armhf. Para más información visite la https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>sección LTS de la wiki de Debian.
+
+
 Para obtener e instalar Debian, consulte la página de la información de instalación y la
 Guía de Instalación. Para actualizar desde una 
-- 
2.8.1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug was closed by holger-guest in the webwml CVS repository:

https://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs

Note that it might take some time until www.debian.org has been updated.

CVSROOT:/cvs/webwml
Module name:webwml
Changes by: holger-guest16/06/03 19:16:50

Modified files:
english/releases/wheezy: index.wml 

Log message:
Add mention to the Wheezy LTS initiative. Closes: #822956--- End Message ---

Re: Bug#822956: www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Santiago Ruano Rincón  wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be
> added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish
> translation to be forwarded to l10n-spanish.

Just committed. thanks


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   8 . 0   " J E S S I E " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

Bug#822956: www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS

[José Gatica]

Cool



Enviado con MailTrack
<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=es&referral=guitarjosegat...@gmail.com&idSignature=23>



*José Gatica A.*
Web Developer
Coordinador Enlaces
56 9 74899270
Valdivia - Chile



2016-04-29 7:29 GMT-03:00 Santiago Ruano Rincón :

> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be
> added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish
> translation to be forwarded to l10n-spanish.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Santiago
>

Bug#822956: www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS

[Santiago Ruano Rincón]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be
added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish
translation to be forwarded to l10n-spanish.

Cheers,

Santiago
>From d3d3cf8548fbc011e81a9365fcf25ef9461729e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Santiago=20Ruano=20Rinc=C3=B3n?= 
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:19:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] releases/wheezy/index.wml: wheezy benefits from LTS

---
 english/releases/wheezy/index.wml | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml b/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml
index 01ac7d5..452073f 100644
--- a/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml
+++ b/english/releases/wheezy/index.wml
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ the Release Notes.
 # Security updates have been discontinued as of <:=spokendate('XXX'):>.
 
 
+Wheezy benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) from 26 April 2016
+until 31 May 2018. The LTS is limited to i386, amd64, armel and armhf. For more
+information, please refer to the https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki.
+
+
 To obtain and install Debian, see
 the installation information page and the
 Installation Guide. To upgrade from an older
-- 
2.8.1

>From c2b54a08623d8f20646bcd7d0fa5b167df83e6a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Santiago=20Ruano=20Rinc=C3=B3n?= 
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:21:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml: wheezy benefits from LTS

---
 spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml | 8 +++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml b/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml
index 9a3fd3b..ca95a50 100644
--- a/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml
+++ b/spanish/releases/wheezy/index.wml
@@ -20,7 +20,13 @@ en las Notas de Publicación.
 Debian 8.0 (jessie).
 # Las actualizaciones de seguridad han dejado de proporcionarse el <:=spokendate('XXX'):>.
 
- 
+
+Wheezy beneficia de soporte a largo plazo («Long Term Support», LTS)
+desde el 26 de abril de 2016 hasta el 31 de mayo de 2018. Wheezy LTS está
+limitado a i386, amd64, armel y armhf. Para más información visite la https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>sección LTS de la wiki de Debian.
+
+
 Para obtener e instalar Debian, consulte la página de la información de instalación y la
 Guía de Instalación. Para actualizar desde una 
-- 
2.8.1

Re: No mention of LTS to the Debian Squeeze page

[Thomas Vincent]

Hello Damien,

Le 16/11/2015 23:11, va...@free.fr a écrit :
> Hi, 
> 
> If it could help, as suggestion, here is in attachment a modified
> index.wml of the current:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/releases/squeeze/index.wml?view=log
> 
> Best regards,

I think it is a good idea!
If nobody objects, I will apply the attached patch in a few days.

Thomas

> 
> Damien / vauss
> 
> 
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:42:11 +0100
> va...@free.fr wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Debian Squeeze page (https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze) does
>> not mention the Long Term Support (LTS). It would be interesting to add
>> a such reference. 
>> Text suggestion: "Squeeze benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until
>> February 2016. The LTS is limited to i386 and amd64. For more
>> information, please refer to the > href="https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki."
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Damien / vauss
>>
Index: index.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/releases/squeeze/index.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 index.wml
--- index.wml	5 May 2013 08:25:29 -	1.15
+++ index.wml	17 Nov 2015 11:27:58 -
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
 # Security updates have been discontinued as of <:=spokendate('XXX'):>.
 
 
+Squeeze also benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until
+February 2016. The LTS is limited to i386 and amd64. For more information,
+please refer to the https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki.
+
+
 To obtain and install Debian, see
 the installation information page and the
 Installation Guide. To upgrade from an older


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: No mention of LTS to the Debian Squeeze page

[vauss]

Hi, 

If it could help, as suggestion, here is in attachment a modified
index.wml of the current:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/releases/squeeze/index.wml?view=log

Best regards,

Damien / vauss


On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:42:11 +0100
va...@free.fr wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The Debian Squeeze page (https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze) does
> not mention the Long Term Support (LTS). It would be interesting to add
> a such reference. 
> Text suggestion: "Squeeze benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until
> February 2016. The LTS is limited to i386 and amd64. For more
> information, please refer to the  href="https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki."
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Damien / vauss
> 
#use wml::debian::template title="Debian “squeeze” Release Information"
#include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/releases/info"
#include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/releases/squeeze/release.data"
#include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/releases/arches.data"

Debian  was
released .
"
  "Debian 6.0.0 was initially released on <:=spokendate('2011-02-06'):>."
/>
The release included many major
changes, described in 
our press release and 
the Release Notes.

Debian 6.0 has been superseded by
Debian 7.0 (wheezy).
# Security updates have been discontinued as of <:=spokendate('XXX'):>.


Squeeze also benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until
February 2016. The LTS is limited to i386 and amd64. For more information, 
please refer to the https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki.


To obtain and install Debian, see
the installation information page and the
Installation Guide. To upgrade from an older
Debian release, see the instructions in the
Release Notes.

The following computer architectures are supported in this release:


<:
foreach $arch (@arches) {
	print "$arches{$arch}\n";
}
:>


Contrary to our wishes, there may be some problems that exist in the
release, even though it is declared stable. We've made
a list of the major known problems, and you can always
report other issues to us.

Last but not least, we have a list of people who take
credit for making this release happen.

No mention of LTS to the Debian Squeeze page

[vauss]

Hi,

The Debian Squeeze page (https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze) does
not mention the Long Term Support (LTS). It would be interesting to add
a such reference. 
Text suggestion: "Squeeze benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until
February 2016. The LTS is limited to i386 and amd64. For more
information, please refer to the https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>LTS section of Debian Wiki."

Regards,

Damien / vauss

Bug#762254: marked as done ("explain LTS on the www.d.o website")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:39:11 +0200
with message-id <5577791f.6070...@larjona.net>
and subject line /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS
has caused the Debian Bug report #751403,
regarding "explain LTS on the www.d.o website"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
751403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: security-tracker
Severity: wishlist

DLAs include a "Source" field that simply says "Debian LTS Team". It
would be nice if, like DSAs, the "Source" field linked to a source of
further information, like the mailing list archive or the Debian website
or to the security tracker SVN/git repository.

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DLA-55-1
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3020-1

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi everybody
I think it's not good to modify the text of an announcement once it's
published, unless it's because some broken link etc. And one year passed
since then...

On the other side, searching today for squeeze LTS gives first and
second top results pointing to adequate pages in the wiki:

wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using

and
wiki.debian.org/LTS

So I think the problem pointed with this bug is solved.

Feel free to reopen the bug if you disagree with this.

Regards

-- 
Laura Arjona
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#751403: marked as done (www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:39:11 +0200
with message-id <5577791f.6070...@larjona.net>
and subject line /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS
has caused the Debian Bug report #751403,
regarding www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze 
LTS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
751403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

I was looking for how to use squeeze LTS.
The mainpage www.debian.org and a websearch for "debian squeeze lts" gives me

https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140424

but there is no more info how to use it and the link to www.debian.org
is not very helpfull because thats where I'm coming from.;)

Please add the link to the security announcement
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2014/msg00119.html
and the link to the wiki page where the usage is described
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Add_squeeze-lts_to_your_sources.list
(is the announced link but the information moved:( )
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using

Thank you.

Regards

Noël

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi everybody
I think it's not good to modify the text of an announcement once it's
published, unless it's because some broken link etc. And one year passed
since then...

On the other side, searching today for squeeze LTS gives first and
second top results pointing to adequate pages in the wiki:

wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using

and
wiki.debian.org/LTS

So I think the problem pointed with this bug is solved.

Feel free to reopen the bug if you disagree with this.

Regards

-- 
Laura Arjona
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#750764: marked as done (packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:46:13 -0800
with message-id <20150131234613.GA3302@kiwi>
and subject line Re: packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite
has caused the Debian Bug report #750764,
regarding packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
750764: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750764
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org

Dear maintainers,

(I saw a message from Jens Korte to the list about this, but I don't
think it was answered.)

Would you please include the squeeze-lts suite on packages.debian.org?

AIUI the suite focuses on security fixes, so perhaps adding the
[security] tag to its packages, as for $codename-security, would be
appropriate?

thanks,
Ryan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:

Would you please include the squeeze-lts suite on packages.debian.org?


I forget when this happened, but it did. Closing this bug, then.

https://packages.debian.org/source/squeeze-lts/allpackages

Thanks.--- End Message ---

Bug#751403: Public image of LTS (was: squeeze-lts and the security tracker)

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:34:34PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 05:02:43PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Le 07/06/2014 16:47, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> > 
> > > First, I need a definite list of source.list entries, that is, a real
> > > answer to the "what to leave in sources.list?" thread. :-)
> > > 
> > > Depending on that answer, there might be different ways for presenting
> > > squeeze-lts in the tracker.
> > 
> > FWIW, since nobody from www seems to be part of the people aware of the
> > LTS workflow, some guidance (or even better, drafts, wordings, or
> > patches) about the ongoing requests and bug reports against www.d.o
> > would be highly welcome.
> > 
> > David, on behalf on the people behind www, a bit lost in the LTS world

In the section "Keeping your Debian system secure", please add
"If you are using Squeeze LTS, you also need to subscribe to the 
debian-lts-announce mailing list."

and

"If you are using Squeeze LTS additional apt sources need to be added:

deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ squeeze-lts main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian/ squeeze-lts main contrib non-free

Additional information can be found at https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using";

And while we're at it, I recommend to drop the following sub-sentence, this 
team is non-existant for
years: "and we also have a Security Audit team that reviews the archive looking 
for new or unfixed security bugs."

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140613134138.GA4104@pisco.westfalen.local

Bug#751403: www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS

[Nadia Jolie]

Thank you.


On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Noël Köthe  wrote:

> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> I was looking for how to use squeeze LTS.
> The mainpage www.debian.org and a websearch for "debian squeeze lts"
> gives me
>
> https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140424
>
> but there is no more info how to use it and the link to www.debian.org
> is not very helpfull because thats where I'm coming from.;)
>
> Please add the link to the security announcement
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2014/msg00119.html
> and the link to the wiki page where the usage is described
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Add_squeeze-lts_to_your_sources.list
> (is the announced link but the information moved:( )
> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards
>
> Noël
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: jessie/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> https://lists.debian.org/20140612135540.30891.10256.report...@air.domain.lan
>
>

Bug#751403: www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS

[Noël Köthe]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

I was looking for how to use squeeze LTS.
The mainpage www.debian.org and a websearch for "debian squeeze lts" gives me

https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140424

but there is no more info how to use it and the link to www.debian.org
is not very helpfull because thats where I'm coming from.;)

Please add the link to the security announcement
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2014/msg00119.html
and the link to the wiki page where the usage is described
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Add_squeeze-lts_to_your_sources.list
(is the announced link but the information moved:( )
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using

Thank you.

Regards

Noël

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140612135540.30891.10256.report...@air.domain.lan

Bug#750764: packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite

[Raphael Geissert]

On Friday 06 June 2014 08:55:13 Ryan Tandy wrote:
[...]
> AIUI the suite focuses on security fixes, so perhaps adding the
> [security] tag to its packages, as for $codename-security, would be
> appropriate?

That's actually used to indicate the origin of the package, so in this case 
should be lts.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/7667424.Ed3VZSqR2T@eee

Bug#750764: packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite

[Ryan Tandy]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org

Dear maintainers,

(I saw a message from Jens Korte to the list about this, but I don't
think it was answered.)

Would you please include the squeeze-lts suite on packages.debian.org?

AIUI the suite focuses on security fixes, so perhaps adding the
[security] tag to its packages, as for $codename-security, would be
appropriate?

thanks,
Ryan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAMXH3QB58V04T_pZo909xfj-S2e=dzGqF=a96yycdu4gab5...@mail.gmail.com

Re: squeeze-lts section

[Stuff ThelinuxFrOrg]

Hi,

Or on the download / main page :D

Regards

> On 30 mai 2014, at 18:38, matteo filippetto  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> there is a request from the squeeze-lts team: is it possible to add a specific
> section about squeeze-lts release and how to enable it into
> https://www.debian.org/security/ ?
> 
> Regards
> 
> -- 
> Matteo Filippetto
> http://www.op83.eu
> @matteo_1983
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> https://lists.debian.org/CAP+0xm7i-ccXprFdQ1_t7GJcFE0GMF4yf_=_bgnlvslr0nb...@mail.gmail.com
> 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/4553148b-32c7-41ce-911b-df345158b...@thelinuxfr.org

squeeze-lts section

[matteo filippetto]

Hi,

there is a request from the squeeze-lts team: is it possible to add a specific
section about squeeze-lts release and how to enable it into
https://www.debian.org/security/ ?

Regards

-- 
Matteo Filippetto
http://www.op83.eu
@matteo_1983


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAP+0xm7i-ccXprFdQ1_t7GJcFE0GMF4yf_=_bgnlvslr0nb...@mail.gmail.com

packages.debian.org w/o squeeze-lts

[Korte]

Hi

In packages.debian.org [1] squeeze-lts isn't mentioned. Could you
please add it?
At least the package hello should already exist.

Greets

Jens Korte

[1]
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=hello


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140521215351.086d9...@x31.hitronhub.home