Bug#116507: Savings of over 60% on USA FDA approved medications such as Valium
FDA official medications available now, Prozac and many more http://cjgo.payment55.com/v95/index.php?id=v95
debian/patches status: 001a, 001b, 003
Oops, sent this to the wrong list like an idiot. Guess I'm still not entirely healthy. * 001a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff Unchanged (except for offsets); renamed 003a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff * 001b_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff Merged into 003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff * 003_xfs-fixes.diff 99% upstream. But these bits aren't: os/utils.c: - Handle pid files the way most other Unix daemons do. Use Matthieu Herrb's version of StorePid(), which refuses to open pre-existing pid files, and is more careful with the type of Pid_t. (Upstream has absorbed some of the changes and not all as far as I can tell; this probably requires some careful scrutiny.) - Allow the user to specify the pid filename on the command line with a "-pid" option (courtesy of Nikita V. Youshchenko). xfs.man: - Document the new "-pid" option (courtesy of Nikita V. Youshchenko). There are also some related missing changes in SetDaemonState. Apart from xfs.man and os/utils.c, though, the rest seems to be upstream.
Re: debian/patches status: 007-010
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) wrote: >> * 006_XftConfig_in_correct_place.diff >> Apparently not upstream, and apparently not merged. However, lots of stuff >> has changed underneath this, so it may (or may not) have been rendered >> irrelevant. ??? Xft1 is updated to use fontconfig(it is not refer XftConfig). This patch is not needed for XFree86 4.3.0 or later. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#220864: xserver-xfree86: dumps lot of 'Not loading .note.GNU-stack' messages on console
Hi x-maintainers, Not loading .note.GNU-stack This is the error message and only root can log into X. There is an other syslog error message about some buffer owned by 0 and something like permisison denied. This second one explains why only root can log in. Is it possible, that the two are not connected? I use an ATI All-In-Wonder 9000PRO card, before that I had no such problem. (Also an nforce motherboard). Googling resulted in some exec-shield problem too, however, I use testing not sid. LAszlo
debian/patches status: 007-010
* 006_XftConfig_in_correct_place.diff Apparently not upstream, and apparently not merged. However, lots of stuff has changed underneath this, so it may (or may not) have been rendered irrelevant. ??? * 007_SECURITY_makedepend_safer.diff Unchanged. Renamed to 011_SECURITY_makedepend_safer.diff. * 008_doc_extensions_fix_diff Appears to be superseded by 000_stolen_from_HEAD_doc_extensions.diff * 009_s3_trio64v2_dx_and_gx_support.diff Unchanged. Renamed to 010_s3_trio64_dx_and_gx_support.diff * 010_linux_apm_vetoed_suspend_fix.diff Upstream (in 4.3.0). -- Nathanael Nerode http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
Bug#225408: Another hitch
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:48:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > PS: It seems as if experimental is missing all -dev packages of the library > > split: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install xlibs-dev/experimental > > libice-dev/experimental > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > Selected version 4.3.0-0pre1v5 (Debian:experimental) for xlibs-dev > > E: Release 'experimental' for 'libice-dev' was not found > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# > > I cannot confirm the existence of this problem. I cannot reproduce it anymore. Perhaps it was only a glitch on my mirror. Thanks for your work on X and Debian! Regards, David -- * Customer: "My palmtop won't turn on." * Tech Support: "Did the battery run out, maybe?" * Customer: "No, it doesn't use batteries. It's Windows powered." -- http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/cs_power.shtml
debian/patches status: linux.cf and xfree86.cf patches
From the 4.3.0 TODO 001_linux_cf.diff --- Most of this is present upstream in 4.3.0 branch. Essentially all of the rest is in 003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff. There are some definite oddities in 003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff, however. I don't pretend to understand these files, but it's worth checking that the folowing are deliberate: * linux.cf: GccAliasingArgs is in OptimizedCDebugFlags upstream, but dropped in the Debian patch, for HPArchitecture, ia64Architecture, Mc68020Architecture, MipsArchitecture, s390Architecture, SparcArchitecture, and SuperHArchitecture. * linux.cf: -fomit-frame-pointer is in OptimizedCDebugFlags upstream, but dropped in the Debian patch, for s390Architecture, s390xArchitecture. * In xfree86.cf, DefaultGcc2i386Opt, DefaultGcc2AxpOpt, and DefaultGcc2PpcOpt are defined to contain GccAliasingArgs. But in linux.cf, they're defined to *not* contain it. Note that GccAliasingArgs was introduced upstream sometime after 4.2. How precisely should it be handled for Debian? * The following silly little fix for unspecified architectures was in 001_linux_cf.diff, but isn't in the new patch: @@ -686,6 +693,7 @@ # endif /* x86_64Architecture */ # else # define CcCmdgcc +# define CplusplusCmd g++ # define AsCmdCcCmd -c -x assembler # define LdCmdCcCmd -nostdlib # define AsmDefines -DUSE_GAS * linux.cf: HPArchitecture doesn't wrap its definition of OptimizedCDebugFlags in the usual #ifndef upstream, and the new patch doesn't either. But the old patch did. I hesitate to submit patches due to my lack of understanding, but if any of the issues are verified and solutions outlined, I could do so. Once these issues are fixed (or verified to be non-issues), 001_linux_cf.diff can be marked as merged to the new 003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff. 004_xfree86_cf.diff Entirely present upstream.
Re: excessive Xfree CPU with linux 2.6?
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 08:45, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 23:48, Kristian Kvilekval wrote: > > I am trying to use the latest kernel, but have noticed > > some changes in the X environment. Simple text output > > has become CPU intensive.For example, > > "ps aux" in a gnome-terminal can force the X server > > process into 70% CPU usage as monitored by top. The > > output is bursty and can slow to a crawl sometimes. > Has Sean's suggestion about the X server nice level helped? I had tried renicing the Xfree server to 0, with little effect. I can still get text output to eat up 60% cpu at times. > See also > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2003/debian-powerpc-200312/msg00144.html > and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753 . Thanks for the pointers, the first describes something similar to what I am seeing, however the discussion diverts simply to using enabling bitmapped fonts. The second suggests disabling anti-aliasing. Unfortunately, I am using fixed font in the terminal and have disabled all hinting and smoothing in gnome. The behavior is definitely that I see fast output mixed with very slow and CPU intensive. I guess this points to scheduler problems. > It seems that the kernel scheduler (related to the interactivity > tuning?) and/or some X clients behave suboptimally. Seems strange that it would be most noticeable for text output. I wouldn't suspect there would be anything particular about the path for outputing text. I guess I will try disabling the new schedulers and see if that has an effect. -- Kristian G. Kvilekval email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] office:(805)893-4276 http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~kris
Re: excessive Xfree CPU with linux 2.6?
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 23:48, Kristian Kvilekval wrote: > I am trying to use the latest kernel, but have noticed > some changes in the X environment. Simple text output > has become CPU intensive.For example, > "ps aux" in a gnome-terminal can force the X server > process into 70% CPU usage as monitored by top. The > output is bursty and can slow to a crawl sometimes. Has Sean's suggestion about the X server nice level helped? See also http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2003/debian-powerpc-200312/msg00144.html and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753 . It seems that the kernel scheduler (related to the interactivity tuning?) and/or some X clients behave suboptimally. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Re: Machine hangs/screen hangs with newer kernels + GL screensavers
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 15:03, Ariel Garcia wrote:
>
> both on my desktop and my laptop i am getting strange hangs when running
> XFree packages (both debian testing/unstable, 4.2.1-{12.1,15}) with the
> newer linux kernels. This happens for me since one of the 2.5.5* kernels
> (and it still happens with 2.6.0) and now i also checked the same happens
> with 4.2.23 (but doesn't happen with 4.2.22). With the 2.5/2.6 kernels i
> checked the same happens with acpi disabled.
Sounds like it's related to the newer DRM.
> What i did to trigger it: boot with 2.4.23 (config file identical to 2.4.22
> one, both compiled with gcc 3.3.x), login in KDE, and activate Lock
> Screen. Everything freezes when trying to run the screensaver (Euphoria GL
> is my default screensaver. Same freeze happens if you open KDE's control
> module for setting the screensaver's properties).
> However the mouse and the OS still work, the system is accessible through
> ssh. At that point i could kill the keuphoria screen saver, but the screen
> was still frozen. So i killed (-9) the Xserver, but at that point the
> machine hung completely.
Typical symptoms of a graphics chip lockup.
> My graphics cards are ATI Radeon (both in laptop and desktop)
FWIW, I can run all screensavers from the kscreensaver package from sid
on my TiBook with a Mobility Radeon 9000 running a 2.6 kernel with my
DRI snapshot packages described in
http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/README.Debian without problems. The
XFree86 4.3 packages in experimental may also work better.
> Probably unrelated, but in XFree86.0.log I get:
>
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
> Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:debug_xform.o": No
> symbols found
>
> I also get tons of
>"Not loading .note.GNU-stack"
> messages in the same XFree server logfile.
These are indeed unrelated and harmless.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Machine hangs/screen hangs with newer kernels + GL screensavers
Hi,
both on my desktop and my laptop i am getting strange hangs when running
XFree packages (both debian testing/unstable, 4.2.1-{12.1,15}) with the
newer linux kernels. This happens for me since one of the 2.5.5* kernels
(and it still happens with 2.6.0) and now i also checked the same happens
with 4.2.23 (but doesn't happen with 4.2.22). With the 2.5/2.6 kernels i
checked the same happens with acpi disabled.
What i did to trigger it: boot with 2.4.23 (config file identical to 2.4.22
one, both compiled with gcc 3.3.x), login in KDE, and activate Lock
Screen. Everything freezes when trying to run the screensaver (Euphoria GL
is my default screensaver. Same freeze happens if you open KDE's control
module for setting the screensaver's properties).
However the mouse and the OS still work, the system is accessible through
ssh. At that point i could kill the keuphoria screen saver, but the screen
was still frozen. So i killed (-9) the Xserver, but at that point the
machine hung completely.
The same also happens if you let the screensaver to kick in.
I couldn't find anything similar in google/debian BTS.
My graphics cards are ATI Radeon (both in laptop and desktop)
Probably unrelated, but in XFree86.0.log I get:
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:debug_xform.o": No
symbols found
I also get tons of
"Not loading .note.GNU-stack"
messages in the same XFree server logfile. This seems to be related to the
last line of one of the several files in /usr/lib/ldscripts, for instance:
# tail /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.x
.debug_str 0 : { *(.debug_str) }
.debug_loc 0 : { *(.debug_loc) }
.debug_macinfo 0 : { *(.debug_macinfo) }
/* SGI/MIPS DWARF 2 extensions */
.debug_weaknames 0 : { *(.debug_weaknames) }
.debug_funcnames 0 : { *(.debug_funcnames) }
.debug_typenames 0 : { *(.debug_typenames) }
.debug_varnames 0 : { *(.debug_varnames) }
/DISCARD/ : { *(.note.GNU-stack) }
}
Anyone?
Thanks in advance (please CC direct to me too),
Ariel
Bug#56179: get Cialis at great discounts
Xanax and many other meds are available now at great low prices Savings of up to %80 on selected drugs such as Cialis http://oxqmplx.payment55.com/v95/index.php?id=v95
Re: xfree planned for sarge
Branden Robinson a écrit : On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote: Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current state of xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 packages and what does prevent them to enter sid (appart from left over from the compromision). http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO Thanks for the answer. Fab
Bug#225520: marked as done (Diff of NMU 1.0.2-3.1)
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:54:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225520: Diff of NMU 1.0.2-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2003 13:26:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 07:26:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from elvenknd.xs4all.nl (zensunni.xinara.org) [213.84.171.68]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AbJSJ-kZ-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:58:39 -0600
Received: from ray by zensunni.xinara.org with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AbJSH-00081n-QB; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:58:37 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:58:37 +0100
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Diff of NMU 1.0.2-3.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel 2.4.23-evms1.2.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: xcursor
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zensunni 2.4.23-evms1.2.1 #1 SMP Sun Nov 30 16:56:51 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch
diff -r -u xcursor-1.0.2-3/debian/changelog xcursor-1.0.2-3.1/debian/changelog
--- xcursor-1.0.2-3/debian/changelog2003-12-30 13:47:29.0 +0100
+++ xcursor-1.0.2-3.1/debian/changelog 2003-12-30 13:55:17.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+xcursor (1.0.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * NMU
+ * [debian/control] Added build dependency on pkg-config. (Closes: #225433)
+ * [debian/control] Removed superfluous space from description to silence
+lintian.
+
+ -- J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:55:15 +0100
+
xcursor (1.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Update copyright file to refer to new canonical upstream URL for source
diff -r -u xcursor-1.0.2-3/debian/control xcursor-1.0.2-3.1/debian/control
--- xcursor-1.0.2-3/debian/control 2003-12-30 13:47:29.0 +0100
+++ xcursor-1.0.2-3.1/debian/control2003-12-30 13:54:27.0 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
Uploaders: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.12), debhelper (>= 4.0.0), xlibs-dev,
libxrender-dev
+Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.12), debhelper (>= 4.0.0), xlibs-dev,
libxrender-dev, pkg-config
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: libxcursor1
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
Depends: libxcursor1 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev | libc-dev, xlibs-dev,
libxrender-dev
-Description: X Cursor management library (development files)
+Description: X Cursor management library (development files)
Xcursor is a simple library designed to help locate and load cursors.
Cursors can be loaded from files or memory and can exist in several sizes and
the library automatically picks the best size. When using images loaded from
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
---
Received: (at 225520-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2004 08:11:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 02 02:11:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AcIGp-00014B-00; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 23:54:51 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9FEF46413C; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:54:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:54:50 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bu
Bug#37960: approved Xanax by fda at great low prices
Xanax and many other meds are available now at great low prices Savings of up to %80 on selected drugs such as Xanax http://jiaurqsqaj.payment55.com/v95/index.php?id=v95
Bug#225408: Another hitch
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:32:38AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > After removing the spurious ), another minor problem popped up. The next line > should be changed to mirror its counterpart in the build target: > > --- debian/rules.orig 2003-12-30 10:21:13.0 +0100 > +++ debian/rules2003-12-30 10:20:53.0 +0100 > @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ >lib/GL lib/Xau lib/Xdmcp lib/font lib/xkbfile lib/xtrans \ >programs/Xserver; do \ > mkdir -p $(SOURCE_TREE)-xserver-xfree86-dbg/$$DIR; \ > - cp -drs $(SOURCE_TREE)/$$DIR > $(SOURCE_TREE)-xserver-xfree86-dbg/$$DIR; \ > + cp -drl $(SOURCE_TREE)/$$DIR > $(SOURCE_TREE)-xserver-xfree86-dbg/$$DIR; \ > done > ifndef test_rules > $(MAKE) -C $(SOURCE_TREE) WORLDOPTS="" > IMAKE_DEFINES="$(IMAKE_DEFINES) -DBuildServersOnly=YES" World Thanks; I fixed this in revision 880. > PS: It seems as if experimental is missing all -dev packages of the library > split: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install xlibs-dev/experimental > libice-dev/experimental > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Selected version 4.3.0-0pre1v5 (Debian:experimental) for xlibs-dev > E: Release 'experimental' for 'libice-dev' was not found > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# I cannot confirm the existence of this problem. $ apt-cache policy xlibs-dev libice-dev xlibs-dev: Installed: 4.3.0-0pre1v5 Candidate: 4.3.0-0pre1v5 Version Table: *** 4.3.0-0pre1v5 0 1 http://http.us.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 4.2.1-15 0 500 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages 4.2.1-12.1 0 500 http://http.us.debian.org testing/main Packages 4.1.0-16woody1 0 500 http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages 500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages libice-dev: Installed: 4.3.0-0pre1v5 Candidate: 4.3.0-0pre1v5 Version Table: *** 4.3.0-0pre1v5 0 1 http://http.us.debian.org ../project/experimental/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] | contest with a monstrous entity http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | that has sixteen legs and no arse. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#6682: Re
This link can change your life clic this link below >> http://pharm56fr.com/host/default.asp?id=az <<
Processed: Re: Bug#225450: xrender: incomplete sentence in changelog
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 225450 + pending Bug#225450: xrender: incomplete sentence in changelog There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:29:33PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Package: xrender Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Severity: minor Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > The changelog entry for xrender (0.8.3-5) includes the sentence Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: severity of 103008 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 103008 wishlist Bug#103008: twm: twm should support the XEmbed spec Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.changes REJECTED
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:56:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:34:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> > > [nothing of substance, annoyingly]
> >
> > Hi all,
> > OK, so here's what happened:
> > [stuff of substance]
> >
> > That's the situation with pre1v5 (i386), unless there's been some
> > ftpmaster action very recently. If there hasn't, I'll send them a
> > request to purge all xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 (i386) uploads from
> > queue/{unchecked,accepted}, and re-upload.
>
> Thanks very much for the exhaustive explanation.
>
> I am missing one piece of information, though -- how did 0pre1v5 (i386)
> get targeted at unstable in the first place? The debian/changelog file
> in the source package I uploaded certainly was not targeted there.
I told sbuild to use it. ;) sbuild -d unstable, instead of sbuild -d
experimental. Whoops.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgpCu4ByjgEHG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#225762: xserver-xfree86: Another magic key sequence to restore video mode etc.
Ah, good. I guess all that's left is to restore the video mode, which isn't really altogether important given the ability to release grabs, but it'd still be nice. Alex. pgpzHDFIDUqao.pgp Description: signature
Bug#126519: approved Ultram by fda at great low prices
Valium and many other meds are available now at great low prices Savings of up to %80 on selected drugs such as Ultram http://iusnu.rr55x.com.com/v95/index.php?id=v95
