Bug#207832: Earn Your Degree Now

2005-08-19 Thread Phillip Dunbar 
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],

A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks !  1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !


Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and 
better pay was a few letters behind your name?  

Well now you can get them!

BA   BSc     MAMScMBA   PhD

Within 2 weeks!  No Study Required! 100% Verifiable!


These are real, genuine non accredited degrees that include Bachelors, Masters 
and Doctorate degrees.  

They are verifiable and student records and transcripts are also available. 

This little known secret has been kept quiet for years.  The opportunity exists 
due to a legal loophole allowing some established colleges to award degrees at 
their discretion.

With all of the attention that this news has been generating, I wouldn't be 
surprised to see this loophole closed very soon.  Order yours today.  Just call 
the number below.  You'll thank me later.



1-206-350-5982



Mohammed Dick






As usual, I had Sunday dinner at my parents' house tonight. Afterwards, my Dad 
and I watched a Jimmy Hendrix concert DVD I bought him. We talked about how, 
though his music may seem like mainstream or even oldies today, Hendrix was 
such a pioneer. He explored what electricity could do for the guitar like 
nobody before him. Famous musicians - many of his peers - marveled at what 
Hendrix created. Yet his career was a short, bright flame. How many people who 
have contributed to art, science and knowledge can say that a few years of 
their career brought them unparalleled success and recognition? I suppose John 
Nash's notion of an original idea really can have that much impact. I don't 
imagine that I will ever affect the world with music or economic theory, but as 
I writer I would like to leave my mark. I think about it often. Will my writing 
be read? Or even matter? I feel that while it's good to admire great thinkers 
and achievers, I'm not doing myself any good fixating on accomplishment when so 
much.3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: ok, try again

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 319121 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Bug#319121: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux
Bug#320473: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.
Bug#321313: FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux
Bug#321819: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev
Bug#323168: larswm: ftbfs [sparc]  cannot find -lselinux
Bug marked as fixed in version 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5, send any further explanations to 
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reopening 323168

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 323168
Bug#323168: larswm: ftbfs [sparc]  cannot find -lselinux
Bug#319121: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev
Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux
Bug#320473: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.
Bug#321313: FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux
Bug#321819: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10

2005-08-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx 
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes: 
>  snmpkit (0.9-10) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>* for some misterious reasons, the Conflict line that is in the source
>  did not reach the libsnmpkit2c2 deb ; so I am rebuilding it
>  (closes: #323168, #323488)

That should have been #323138 and not #323168.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321819: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 17:57:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 10:57:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-118-086.arcor-ip.net (gleep.earth.sol) 
[82.83.118.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1oOn-Dv-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:53:21 -0700
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E1oOm-0006Wr-6T
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:53:20 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:53:20 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xcal
Version: 4.1-18.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of xcal_4.1-18.1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 42
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper, xlibs-dev, xutils, libxaw7-dev
[...]
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libfreetype6 libfs6 libice-dev libice6 libselinux1 libsm-dev libsm6 libx11-6
  libx11-dev libxau-dev libxau6 libxaw7 libxaw7-dev libxext-dev libxext6
  libxi-dev libxi6 libxkbfile-dev libxkbfile1 libxmu-dev libxmu6 libxmuu-dev
  libxmuu1 libxp-dev libxp6 libxpm-dev libxpm4 libxrandr-dev libxrandr2
  libxrender-dev libxrender1 libxt-dev libxt6 libxtrap-dev libxtrap6
  libxtst-dev libxtst6 libxv-dev libxv1 lsb-base pm-dev render-dev x-dev
  x11-common xlibs-data xlibs-dev xlibs-static-dev xutils zlib1g-dev
0 upgraded, 49 newly installed, 0 to remove and 21 not upgraded.
[...]
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_alarm.o xcal_alarm.c
xcal_alarm.c: In function 'AlarmScan':
xcal_alarm.c:335: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
function 'exit'
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_buts.o xcal_buts.c
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_days.o xcal_days.c
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_edit.o xcal_edit.c
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_help.o xcal_hel

Bug#319410: marked as done (imake assumes availability of selinux)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 21:27:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 14:27:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DviZr-00053U-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:27:36 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22442
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2896BF2DC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 14679-32 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST) 13991
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LLRW7E020427;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: imake assumes availability of selinux
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xutils
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious

the xisdnutils imake run in isdnutils/xmonisdn generates:

   SELINUX_LDFLAGS =

   SELINUX_INCLUDES = -I/usr/include/selinux

   SELINUX_CFLAGS =  -DHAVE_SELINUX

   SELINUX_LIBS = -lselinux


Is this intended? There's nothing why xmonisdn would need selinux.
Looks like this leeds to many FTBFS for packages.

Maybe xutils should depend on some selinux package?

---
Received: (at 323168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:10:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6E0H-z4-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: snmpkit
Source-Version: 0.9-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snmpkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snmpkit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it ple

Bug#319121: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2005 23:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 16:38:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dv1fR-00015E-00; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:38:29 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6JNcPO0029188
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DuszL-ux-IR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:22:27 -0700
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:22:27 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu"
Content-Disposition: inline


--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: groff
Version: 1.18.1.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

groff fails to build because it cannot find libselinux:

gcc -m32 -o gxditview -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -L/usr/X11R6/lib   =
xditview.o   Dvi.o   draw.o   font.o   lex.o   page.o   parse.o   XFontName=
=2Eo   DviChar.o   device.o -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -=
lX11   -lselinux   -lm
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [gxditview] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/groff-1.18.1.1/src/xditview'
make: *** [build-groff-x11] Error 2

The attached patch adds a build-dependency on libselinux1-dev, which
fixes this problem.

--=20
Matt

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="groff_1.18.1.1-8.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control
--- groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control
+++ groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: byacc, debhelper (>=3D 3.0.9), gs, netpbm, psutils, xutils,=
 libxaw7-dev | libxaw-dev, xlibs-dev
+Build-Depends: byacc, debhelper (>=3D 3.0.9), gs, netpbm, psutils, xutils,=
 libxaw7-dev | libxaw-dev, xlibs-dev, libselinux1-dev
=20
 Package: groff-base
 Architecture: any

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--

--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC3QyifNdgYxVXvBARAkYEAJ9o7R+xujF+PshkQx5uPBzyZa4qIQCfbNj2
P9SKLjwK41qHvXv6Y8T0V5w=
=bwD5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK--

---
Received: (at 323168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:10:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6E0H-z4-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMA

Bug#320473: marked as done (isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 17:15:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 10:15:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyYSc-0003Tq-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:15:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id CC69B3BC078
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9663BC068
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 4682626136; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.7.2005-07-09-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -o xmonisdn -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -L/usr/X11R6/lib   xmonisdn.o Net.o 
-lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -lX11 -lselinux -lm
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

This seems to be caused by a missing build dependency on
libselinux1-dev.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 323168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:10:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6E0H-z4-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: snmpkit
Source-Version: 0.9-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snmpkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snmpkit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:45:32 +0200
Source: snmpkit
Binary: libsnmpkit-dev libsnmpkit2c2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libsnmpkit-dev - multithreaded SNMP connection library
 libsnmpkit2c2 - multithreaded SNMP connection library
Closes: 323168 323488
Ch

Bug#323168: marked as done (larswm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lselinux)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 07:33:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 00:33:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4ZSu-00084A-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:33:00 -0700
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j7F7Ww7k002884
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:32:58 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7F7VCPH025408;
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:31:12 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7F7VCJP025406;
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:31:12 -0700
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:31:12 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: larswm: ftbfs [sparc]  cannot find -lselinux
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: larswm
Version: 7.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

larswm failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.

gcc -o larswm -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DTHREE_D -DUSE_LOCALE  
-L/usr/X11R6/lib   main.o event.o manage.o buttons.o client.o error.o tiling.o 
prefs.o keys.o mouse.o bar.o  -lXext -lX11   -lselinux 
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

---
Received: (at 323168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:10:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6E0H-z4-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: snmpkit
Source-Version: 0.9-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snmpkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snmpkit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:45:32 +0200
Source: snmpkit
Binary: libsnmpkit-dev libsnmpkit2c2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libsnmpkit-dev - mult

Bug#321313: marked as done (FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux)

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 20:04:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 13:04:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E0lwt-0006IF-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:04:15 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1E0lzM-0003pt-C7; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:06:48 +0200
Received: from p54a3ec38.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.236.56] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1E0lyQ-0001Im-MO; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:05:50 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E0lws-0005Xn-KV; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:04:14 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:04:14 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: login.app
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

trying to recompile login.app in a sid chroot leads to the following
error:

c++ -o Login.app -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -L/usr/X11R6/lib   Main.o 
App.o Input.o SwitchUser.o Panel.o -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lXext 
-lX11 -lXpm -lcrypt -lpam   -lselinux
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [Login.app] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/login.app-1.2.1'

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 323168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:10:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6E0H-z4-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: snmpkit
Source-Version: 0.9-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snmpkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-10_i386.deb
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-10_i386.deb
snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.diff.gz
snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-10.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snmpkit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive

Processed: fixing severity

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 314990 important
Bug#314990: xdm: cannot log in
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323994: xterm: valgrind reports overlapping memory in memcpy()

2005-08-19 Thread Thomas Dickey 
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
> Severity: normal
 
It's a bug in libXt, not xterm.
I fixed it in XFree86 source when I ANSIfy'd it over a year ago.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


pgpdFbxbUdC9v.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#324002: x-window-system-core: please depend on xserver instead of xserver-xorg

2005-08-19 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe 
Package: x-window-system-core
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

currently, x-window-system-core depends on xserver-xorg, which denies
the alternative installation of xserver-xfree86. Is this intentional?
Would it instead be possible to depend on the virtual package xserver
and let users decide if they like to have X.org or XFree86?


Thanks for your work & regards
   Mario
-- 
 talk softly and carry a keen sword


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323994: xterm: valgrind reports overlapping memory in memcpy()

2005-08-19 Thread Justin Pryzby 
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Severity: normal

Immediately after starting xterm:

  ==6726== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0x1BD8A4F8, 0x1BD8A4F8, 4)
  ...
  ==6726==by 0x1BAAD617: XtVaCreateManagedWidget (in 
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0)
  ==6726==by 0x8074265: (within /tmp/xterm)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: clone

2005-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 256376 -1
Bug#256376: procps: top segfaults, if the xterm is to small
Bug 256376 cloned as bug 324001.

> reassign -1 xterm
Bug#324001: procps: top segfaults, if the xterm is to small
Bug reassigned from package `procps' to `xterm'.

> retitle -1 xterm: top in a super-small xterm crashes them both
Bug#324001: procps: top segfaults, if the xterm is to small
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320828: xserver-xorg: Sometimes crashes in ATI driver when resizing XV window

2005-08-19 Thread Marcel Moreaux 
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:00:59PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
> El lunes, 1 de agosto de 2005 22:00, Marcel Moreaux escribi?:
> > The X server sometimes crashes when resizing XV windows (e.g. mplayer).
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The hardware is an ATI rage mobility P/M, using the "ati" driver
> > shipping with xserver-xorg (ati_drv.o). lspci info:
> 
> Hello, Marcel. Could you please download *_drv.o from 
> http://people.debian.org/~ender/, put them 
> in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/, and restart X, to see if your problem 
> fades away?

I have copied *_drv.o from that page to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/,
restarted X, and I could still reproduce the crash.

This was using xserver-xorg, not xserver-xorg-dbg (which, AFAIK, does
not use loadable modules), so the gdb output was not helpful at all. The
server still caught a SIGFPE.


If you need more information, please ask :)



Marcel Moreaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318319: xserver-xorg: radeon driver troubles

2005-08-19 Thread Michael Bonhomme 
Michael Bonhomme a écrit :

>David Martínez Moreno a écrit :
>
>  
>
>>El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 19:52, Michael Bonhomme escribió:
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>>Package: xserver-xorg
>>>Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
>>>Severity: important
>>>
>>>
>>>Graphic card : VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon
>>>Mobility U1 (this bug is resolved if I replace
>>>/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o with the one from ubuntu's
>>>xserver-xorg 6.8.2-10 package)
>>>
>>>
>>>When running Xorg with "X" command, it works fine, but if I go to text mode
>>>and then go back to X, I can only move the cursor, C-A-Fx doesn't work,
>>>Xorg process uses all CPU, and I can't kill it.
>>>
>>>Also when starting gnome, it crashes the same way it is described above
>>>when xfwm4 starts.
>>>
>>>
>>>I also tried to replace libvgahw but it didn't changed anything.
>>>   
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>  Hello, Michael. Could you please download *_drv.o from 
>>http://people.debian.org/~ender/, put them 
>>in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/, and restart X, to see if your problem 
>>fades away?
>>
>>  Best regards,
>>
>>
>>  Ender.
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>I've just tested your radeon_drv.o, and it works like a charm.
>Regards.
>
>Michael.
>  
>

I've done other tests and with your files I don't have accelerated 3D
anymore.
Here is glxgears output:

LibGL warning : 3D driver returned no fbconfigs
LibGL error : InitDriver failed
LibGL error : reverting to (slow) indirect rendering

Regards.
Michael.

Bug#318319: xserver-xorg: radeon driver troubles

2005-08-19 Thread Michael Bonhomme 
David Martínez Moreno a écrit :

>El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 19:52, Michael Bonhomme escribió:
>  
>
>>Package: xserver-xorg
>>Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
>>Severity: important
>>
>>
>>Graphic card : VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon
>>Mobility U1 (this bug is resolved if I replace
>>/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o with the one from ubuntu's
>>xserver-xorg 6.8.2-10 package)
>>
>>
>>When running Xorg with "X" command, it works fine, but if I go to text mode
>>and then go back to X, I can only move the cursor, C-A-Fx doesn't work,
>>Xorg process uses all CPU, and I can't kill it.
>>
>>Also when starting gnome, it crashes the same way it is described above
>>when xfwm4 starts.
>>
>>
>>I also tried to replace libvgahw but it didn't changed anything.
>>
>>
>
>   Hello, Michael. Could you please download *_drv.o from 
>http://people.debian.org/~ender/, put them 
>in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/, and restart X, to see if your problem 
>fades away?
>
>   Best regards,
>
>
>   Ender.
>  
>
I've just tested your radeon_drv.o, and it works like a charm.
Regards.

Michael.

Bug#323977: Can't install xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb

2005-08-19 Thread Wolfgang Hartter 
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14

In Debian/sid I want to upgrade from 4.3.0 to
xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb but get the following errors:

Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert:
  xlibs
1 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht
aktualisiert.
Es müssen noch 0B von 477kB Archiven geholt werden.
Nach dem Auspacken werden 430kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt.
Möchten Sie fortfahren [J/n]?
(Lese Datenbank ... 135091 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit
installiert.)
Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
(durch .../xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1 -5_all.deb) ...
cp: ,,/etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86" und ,,/etc/X11/xkb/rules/xorg" sind
die gleich e Datei
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten
von /var/cache/apt/archives/xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_al l.deb (--unpack):
 Unterprozess pre-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
usage error: replace_conffile_with_symlink_rollback() called with wrong
   number of arguments; expected 2, got 1
Please report a bug in the postrm script of the xlibs package,
   version 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 to the Debian Bug Tracking System.
   Include all messages above that mention the xlibs package.  Visit
    on the World Wide Web for
   instructions, read the file /usr/share/doc/debian/bug-reporting.txt
from
   the doc-debian package, or install the reportbug package and use the
   command of the same name to file a report.
dpkg: Fehler beim Aufräumen:
 Unterprozess post-removal script gab den Fehlerwert 99 zurück
Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Wolfgang Hartter

Bug#323954: updating x11-common

2005-08-19 Thread rs 
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: experimental


dpkg: error at /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb  
(--unpack)
usage error: replace_conffile_with_symlink_rollback() called with wrong
number of arguments;
 expected 2; got 1

so i downloaded this file manually and tried to install it,
but got the same error.

with regards

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-npx.20050406
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- debconf information:
  x11-common/experimental_packages:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320828: xserver-xorg: Sometimes crashes in ATI driver when resizing XV window

2005-08-19 Thread David Martínez Moreno 
El lunes, 1 de agosto de 2005 22:00, Marcel Moreaux escribió:
> The X server sometimes crashes when resizing XV windows (e.g. mplayer).
>
> The problem _seems_ to occur more often when mplayer is run remotely
> over a ssh-tunnel; sometimes just starting mplayer remotely already
> crashes the X server. However, this only seems to occur if there already
> have been XV windows since the X server started; i.e. it doesn't seem to
> occur on a freshly started X server.
>
> It's usually reproducable by just starting mplayer, resizing the window
> a lot (especially to minimal sizes), closing mplayer, starting mplayer
> again, resizing again, etc.
>
> The hardware is an ATI rage mobility P/M, using the "ati" driver
> shipping with xserver-xorg (ati_drv.o). lspci info:

Hello, Marcel. Could you please download *_drv.o from 
http://people.debian.org/~ender/, put them 
in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/, and restart X, to see if your problem 
fades away?

Best regards,


Ender.
-- 
We accidentally replaced your heart with a baked potato. You have
 about three seconds to live.
-- Dr. Doctor to Kenny (South Park).
--
Debian developer


pgp9bKimWqQyE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#318319: xserver-xorg: radeon driver troubles

2005-08-19 Thread David Martínez Moreno 
El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 19:52, Michael Bonhomme escribió:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> Graphic card : VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon
> Mobility U1 (this bug is resolved if I replace
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o with the one from ubuntu's
> xserver-xorg 6.8.2-10 package)
>
>
> When running Xorg with "X" command, it works fine, but if I go to text mode
> and then go back to X, I can only move the cursor, C-A-Fx doesn't work,
> Xorg process uses all CPU, and I can't kill it.
>
> Also when starting gnome, it crashes the same way it is described above
> when xfwm4 starts.
>
>
> I also tried to replace libvgahw but it didn't changed anything.

Hello, Michael. Could you please download *_drv.o from 
http://people.debian.org/~ender/, put them 
in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/, and restart X, to see if your problem 
fades away?

Best regards,


Ender.
-- 
Buzz Lightyear: You killed my father!
Emperor Zurg: No, Buzz...I am your father.
-- Toy Story 2.
--
Debian developer


pgpcDwb8eUzFA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#56179: sinkhole

2005-08-19 Thread Sam Jacobson 
ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification:

Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with 
three deals from two different brokers.

Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past 
credit is a non-issue.

Please validate your information with our secure/private database to ensure our 
records are accurate.

http://www.low-est.com/index.php?refid=windsor

Thank You and Good Day

Sincerely,

Sam Jacobson
Customer Service Rep.
eLMR INC

If this reached you in error please let our office know so we can take you off 
the list:
http://www.low-est.com/r.php






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]