[Bug 813755] [NEW] gnome-keyring-daemon fails to start as it can't get capabilities
Public bug reported: Hi, With a fresh oneiric install gnome-keyring-daemon won't start for me, complaining about not being able to get capabilities. If I set the excecutable to be suid root then it starts fine. Thanks, James ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813755 Title: gnome-keyring-daemon fails to start as it can't get capabilities To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/813755/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 393012] Re: [SRU] smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
** Branch unlinked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/autofs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012 Title: [SRU] smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument" -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 526794] Re: Please sync gtk-doc-tools from debian stable/unstable main
** Changed in: gtk-doc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Please sync gtk-doc-tools from debian stable/unstable main https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk-doc in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 539301] Sync gthumb 3:2.11.2.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
2010-03-22 18:48:09 INFOgthumb_2.11.2.1.orig.tar.gz: already in distro - downloading from librarian [Updating] gthumb (3:2.11.2.1-1ubuntu1 [Ubuntu] < 3:2.11.2.1-2 [Debian]) * Trying to add gthumb... 2010-03-22 18:48:09 INFO - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> 2010-03-22 18:48:09 INFO - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> 2010-03-22 18:48:09 INFO - I: gthumb [universe] -> gthumb_3:2.11.2.1-1ubuntu1 [universe]. I: gthumb [universe] -> gthumb-dbg_3:2.11.2.1-1ubuntu1 [universe]. I: gthumb [universe] -> gthumb-data_3:2.11.2.1-1ubuntu1 [universe]. I: gthumb [universe] -> gthumb-dev_3:2.11.2.1-1ubuntu1 [universe]. ** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Sync gthumb 3:2.11.2.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 538204] Re: Window controls are on the wrong side in gnome-appearance-properties
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532754 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532754 ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 532754 gnome-appearance does not reflect order of metacity buttons correctly -- Window controls are on the wrong side in gnome-appearance-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 517958] Sync gtkspell 2.0.16-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
[Updating] gtkspell (2.0.15-0ubuntu1 [Ubuntu] < 2.0.16-1 [Debian]) * Trying to add gtkspell... - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> I: gtkspell [main] -> libgtkspell0_2.0.15-0ubuntu1 [main]. I: gtkspell [main] -> libgtkspell-dev_2.0.15-0ubuntu1 [main]. ** Changed in: gtkspell (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- Sync gtkspell 2.0.16-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkspell in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 326135] Re: User Privileges ignored
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:04:22 -, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > James: Do you know whether it's possible to allow users members of > certain Unix groups to perform certain actions? In PolicyKit's docs, I > can only find auth_self and auth_admin. If the program needs to check > that the user is member of the group itself, the whole purpose of > PolicyKit is destroyed. Or we should get rid of all those groups then... There is only auth_self and auth_admin, correct. However, the system adminstrator can do overrides that are more finegrained, down to the user/group level. I believe it would be possible for them to create a policy (on top of an Ubuntu default system that just said "yes" rather than "auth_*") where the default was "no", but anyone in the netdev group could do it without a password. Thanks, James -- User Privileges ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 326135] Re: User Privileges ignored
This isn't a policykit bug. It's not getting involved at any stage of this as far as I can see. If network-manager wants to call it to find out if the user can connect to the internet then it can be involved, but until that point there is nothing to fix in that package. Thanks, James ** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- User Privileges ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 493382] Re: cant set background to space pictures on netbook remix
Hi, I think this is a netbook-launcher bug as that draws the background on UNR. Thanks, James ** Package changed: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) => netbook-launcher (Ubuntu) -- cant set background to space pictures on netbook remix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 484559] Re: Xubuntu: Cannot change own password because users-admin needs gnome-about-me
On Wed Nov 18 11:37:47 UTC 2009 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Ouch! Indeed, that was a side-effect of our recent patch that was not > expected. The rationale for running gnome-about-me was that its way of > changing your password allowed eCryptfs Private directory to be mounted > with the new password: see bug 307019. Maybe the best solution for now > would be to install gnome-about-me on Xubuntu - I don't think it has > many dependencies. I intended to make gnome-system-tools recommend gnome-about-me, but missed this in my upload, sorry. That would have installed it on Xubuntu, but I'm not sure if it would have been pulled in on upgrades, I would have to ask. We could fix this in an SRU. > James: How ironical - the more you solve bugs, the more you have to work > on them... ;-) Too true :-) Thanks, James -- Xubuntu: Cannot change own password because users-admin needs gnome-about-me https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395302] Re: kills X session during upgrade
Martin, I'm fairly sure you were hitting bug 446534. As you now have the fixed versions installed you should not see this again. Thanks, James -- kills X session during upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 442089] Re: gThumb do not show any pictures in directories, although the fact that they are there. But normally show directory structure.
On Wed Oct 14 14:08:11 UTC 2009 VPablo wrote: > and removed both > ~/.local/share/mime and /usr/local/share/mime and gthumb is working as > expected. It's that step that fixed it. ~/.local/share/mime isn't being read correctly by some libraries until your session is restarted with the fixed versions. Thanks, James -- gThumb do not show any pictures in directories, although the fact that they are there. But normally show directory structure. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 448788] Re: Image browser doesn't show any images
Hi, Have you rebooted recently? This was a mime issue that was fixed a couple of days ago. If you restart your session it should work. Thanks, James ** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- Image browser doesn't show any images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 448788] Re: Image browser doesn't show any images
** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Image browser doesn't show any images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 418300] Re: gdu-notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_devices()
Hi, I'm pretty sure I just fixed this with the upload of dbus 1.2.16-0ubuntu8. If you install the fixed version and get the error after a reboot then please re-open, but then I'll be *really* stumped. Thanks, James ** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- gdu-notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_devices() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 440625] Re: [ubuntu 9.10 beta] keyboard layout (dvorak) does not apply post-installation
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 421212 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421212 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 421212 gdm ignores keyboard layout selection for variants -- [ubuntu 9.10 beta] keyboard layout (dvorak) does not apply post-installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 440635] Re: [ubuntu 9.10 beta] required icon themes missing for two included GNOME themes
These themes specify that they require Human in their index.theme, but don't depend on it, so the icon theme isn't available. Thanks, James ** Package changed: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) => gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Also affects: gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Tags added: regression-potential ** Summary changed: - [ubuntu 9.10 beta] required icon themes missing for two included GNOME themes + required icon themes missing for two included GNOME themes -- required icon themes missing for two included GNOME themes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 376145] Re: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables()
"This reliably gives a client-side timeout with the default timeout". No, it doesn't. Though I thought I was seeing this to start with. Even more confusing, unless it was just a figment of my imagination. Thanks, James -- gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 376145] Re: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables()
I've been looking at what we think is the cause of this and other bugs tonight with Chris. I've been using gdu-notification-daemon, but we think it is the same root cause, a timeout on the GetAll call in the gnome-disk-utility code. Based on Chris' idea we added sleep(5) call to devicekit-disks-daemon as the first thing it does. This makes the issue more reproducible. Given that at startup the system is loaded it makes sense that longer time to execute causes the issue. This sleep is under the 25 seconds timeout that the activation has (different to the call timeout), so that's not likely to be kicking in (barring accounting bugs), and even if it does it should give an error response, not cause a call timeout client-side. This reliably gives a client-side timeout with the default timeout. We tweaked that timeout to see what happens. * On my machine it is around a 20.15 second timeout that you get the switch. Less than this and it times out, more and it works. * The time taken to get the timeout error, and the time taken to get the call return are ~about equal at 5.something seconds, nowhere near the actual timeout specified. * Reducing the sleep to 3 seconds doesn't have a linear effect on the issue. You have to reduce the timeout by a lot more than 2 seconds to see the failures there. I haven't investigated this relationship further or looked for discontinuities. My current suspicion is that this is a D-Bus bug. Some sort of error means that when it gets the real response it instead returns the timeout response when the specified timeout is less than some threshold. I'm not sure why there seems to be a relationship between that threshold and the amount of time that it takes to start the service though. Please bear in mind that this is just my blind pokings, and that nothing I say should be taken as fact. It may well be that this is the wrong tree to be barking up in some way. Thanks, James -- gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 435935] Re: Support Upstart
On Sun Sep 27 20:46:13 UTC 2009 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > >From what /usr/share/doc/upstart/README.Debian.gz explains, we can > easily provide as many features as before by working with scripts from > /etc/init.d, isn't it? Upstart jobs in /etc/init are essential parts of > the system, and there's little interest in disabling them. Yeah, not allowing some things to be disabled may be sensible anyway. I haven't looked at the full list of conversions, bug I believe it includes GDM? That may well be something someone wants to disable? Still though, allowing to control the things that are still init scripts would be good. > So I'd say that at least for Karmic, we can limit the work required. > What we need is mostly a shift from running the scripts by themselves to > using 'start'/'stop' to do so. I can do that quickly since our code fits > well in that design. I've also a pair of little fixes that can make > disabling services more correct, renaming links to "KNNservice" instead > of plainly removing the files. What's your feeling about that? Those fixes will be great if we do ship it, thanks. 'start'/'stop' is cleaner, but if only init scripts can be changed I don't think it makes any practical difference. Thanks, James -- Support Upstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
I'm having trouble coming up with an elegant way to add the special case for the user themselves. Adding a button to use gnome-about-me seems the best way, but asking gnome-about-me to just run the password changer isn't currently possible, and not trivial to implement for me. We could run the whole of gnome-about-me, but that obscures the password change button. Running gnome-about-me instead of the whole properties dialog also means you can't change groups and the like. Due to the architecture of g-s-t et. al. I'm not sure how to re-use what is there and just have the process change the password without having the backend make the change as well. Any assistance would be welcome. Thanks, James -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 433701] Re: services-admin should be disabled
Hi, As I understand it using "service" should be the preferred way of manipulating services now. It supports sysvinit and upstart, and will gracefully handle the transitions. It doesn't include a "disable" interface, which I think gst provides? Thanks, James -- services-admin should be disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 361024] Re: Can't stop landscape-client from System > Administration > Services
On Fri Sep 18 13:33:25 UTC 2009 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > I've just pushed the fix as explained by Daniel as commit 72c72fa. > Sadly, it won't be available until GNOME 2.30, since we're now frozen. > Possibly for a minor 2.28.1 release, but I'd need to know whether some > Ubuntu developers are interested in uploading it. As we have now moved to Upstart for some services, which doesn't yet have a general mechanism for disabling services (though there are various ways to acheive it), that we should perhaps not ship/hide by default services-admin in karmic. Do you know if there has been any work to get it supporting upstart? Thanks, James -- Can't stop landscape-client from System > Administration > Services https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 434269] Re: when I open my laptop lid, gsd changes my resolution
On Tue Sep 22 05:17:10 UTC 2009 Steve Langasek wrote: > abracadabra! > > ** Attachment added: "monitors.xml" >http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32230221/monitors.xml Thanks. The last configuration has LEN 0x4050 0x and I'm not sure what that will do as the width and height are not specified. I'm not sure whether it would pick that configuration either. I'm not even sure if this file has anything to do with your problem. Perhaps you could try deleting the whole of the last stanza? Thanks, James -- when I open my laptop lid, gsd changes my resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 434269] Re: when I open my laptop lid, gsd changes my resolution
On Mon Sep 21 23:41:18 UTC 2009 Steve Langasek wrote: > monitors.xml attached. Note that the contents of this file are largely > not my doing, and now that I know this is there, I'll probably nuke most > of it since it doesn't work the way I want it to in any case. :-) I don't see an attachment? Thanks, James -- when I open my laptop lid, gsd changes my resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 434269] Re: when I open my laptop lid, gsd changes my resolution
On Mon Sep 21 22:19:00 UTC 2009 Chris Coulson wrote: > Thank you for your bug report. Could you please kill gnome-settings- > daemon, and then restart it with: > > gnome-settings-daemon --no-daemon --debug 2>&1 | tee g-s-d.log > > When it is running, please try opening/closing your lid and seeing if it > prints anything out (there are a few debug statements in the xrandr > plugin but maybe not enough to conclude if it is doing anything here, > although it might give a clue) Also, ~/.config/monitors.xml could be useful. [ apport hook? ] Thanks, James -- when I open my laptop lid, gsd changes my resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 287134] Re: users-admin sets up maximum 8 character password
On Wed Sep 02 17:56:58 UTC 2009 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > I don't really understand how it's working currently. Is Ubuntu using > SHA? If so, is liboobs writing MD5 passwords to /etc/shadow? That's what the patch in this bug does. Kees implemented a better solution for us which gave us encryption of the same strength as default. Writing MD5 is better than 3DES, but should still be avoided. > We should at least support SHA as well as MD5. I plan to make a release > before Karmic so that a few bugfixes go into it. Do you think you could > improve the patch before that? Well, the patch is fine as far as it goes. The main thing to add would be SHA support. I would like to see the default be for the strongest that stb knows about, so that when the switch is made next time the unkown scheme translates to SHA512 being used, rather than 3DES again. > Using PAM is of course much cleaner and logical, but we need to find a > way to send the clear password to the backends, and that won't be done > before Karmic. An intermediate fix would be Kees's patch [1] to use > chpasswd, but upstreaming it is difficult since we have to be sure > chpasswd is present, or use the stb for that. So maybe it would be worth > fixing the problem once for all using PAM, instead of spending time on > temporary fixes. I think that would be good, but as you say it's not straightforward. Creating the pipe and passing the password over isn't too much work. I think it will require changing the D-Bus interface though. Thanks, James -- users-admin sets up maximum 8 character password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 287134] Re: users-admin sets up maximum 8 character password
Hi Milan, This would be good to take upstream at minimum. Moving away from a binary MD5/3DES choice would be better. Moving to PAM would be better still, as you get this for free and there is no danger of it getting out of date again and causing a similar issue. Thanks, James -- users-admin sets up maximum 8 character password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
On Fri Aug 28 18:21:08 UTC 2009 Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:33:11PM -0000, James Westby wrote: > > I'm pretty certain that If we just pass the new password to pam then it > > can do the rest. I belive that using "sudo passwd " doesn't break > > eCryptfs. > > Unfortunately, AFAIK, that does break it -- it must be the user themselves > calling "passwd" since then PAM will prompt for the old password to > pass through the PAM stack. eCryptfs (and potentially other things) > use it to decrypt the mount passphrase, and then re-encrypt it with the > new PAM password. Ah, my apologies. So changing gst to use pam buys us nothing over just special casing the current user? Thanks, James -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
On Thu Aug 27 22:36:16 UTC 2009 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Yeah, I forgot that eCryptfs requires the real password to work. It also > needs the old password BTW, so this will never work if the admin changes > the password, since he's not likely to know the old one. Thus, I'm not > sure it's worth using the backends at all. Ideally, D-Bus could provide > us with a secure connection (why isn't that the case?); we could also > use a pipe, should be possible but will require some work. Well, pam can provide enough to ecryptfs for it to do it's job, so going through pam would buy us this, and much more as well. I'm not sure about DBus, I think it can provide a connection with some level of security, but I'm also leaning towards a pipe being the best solution. > If your goal is to get this fixed for Alpha 6, better go with a client- > side solution. Just patch the GUI to call the required program. That may be wise at this point. > I'm planning to redesign the GUI in the next cycle, and I may well use > something like the about-me dialog to change passwords, so that may help > in the middle-term. In the long term, I'm not sure we really need to > pass the clear password to the backends, since it would only be useful > for eCryptfs, which does not fit in our authentication model since the > admin needs the original password. It's more than eCryptfs, it allows us to use pam, which is a neccessity in my eyes, having more than one thing handling all this stuff is going to keep causing problems. > I'd eventually go for a solution > where eCryptfs is setuid so that anybody (here the GUI) can ask the user > the old and change it if it's the right one. No need for other checks, I > guess. If the admin changes the password on it own, eCryptfs should show > a dialog on start asking for the old password so that it is then > changed. Can you find something better? I'm pretty certain that If we just pass the new password to pam then it can do the rest. I belive that using "sudo passwd " doesn't break eCryptfs. Thanks, James -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 418132] Re: Can't unlock tzone, users & groups
Please run "users-admin" from a terminal and report any output here. Thanks, James -- Can't unlock tzone, users & groups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
> Being the new maintainer of the stb, gst and friends, Thanks for taking on this task. > I must precise that if you want them to work properly with a new feature, > that's a matter of one line fixes, most of > the time. They are actually using "usermod -p" in the background. So if you > find the stb are broken, well, fix your > command line tools. We can't fix "usermod -p" to go through pam, as pam requires the plaintext password so that the modules can do as they like with it (which ecryptfs needs I believe). usermod -p takes the encrypted password. It does this as the separation between gst and stb means that you want to crypt the password in one process and then pass it over, rather than sending the plaintext. This separation is needed for the policykit stuff, and it is chosen to do it over DBus. When changing your own password you don't need polkit, and so you can do it in process (as gnome-about-me does), and so use pam with the plaintext password. Now, Kees' proposal for the common case of changing your own password is to hand off to gnome-about-me, gst could do this in-process for the same effect. So, to fix this properly in gst for the other cases we need to do something different. Some ideas * Rely on DBus security policies to stop snooping. I'm not sure how reliable this is. * DBus-ssl: negotiate an encrypted channel using DH key exchange or similar over DBus. I like the idea but it's rather over-engineered unfortunately :-) * gst requests that stb create a named pipe on the fs that it then writes the plaintext to. Kees would be able to say how secure that would be. * Drop DBus and move to a suid helper, still protected by polkit, and pass the plaintext using stdin or similar. Having something like the above would clearly be a better fix, but is more work than the proposed simple fix for the common case. > It would be fairly easy to use another program, or to run, say, > ecryptfs-rewrap-passphrase, just > after changing the password. The backend still would need the plaintext to run that wouldn't it? Thanks, James -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 418132] Re: Can't unlock tzone, users & groups
** Package changed: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) => gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) -- Can't unlock tzone, users & groups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: window switcher tooltips stick when they shouldn't
** Summary changed: - Jaunty: window switcher tooltips stick when they shouldn't + window switcher tooltips stick when they shouldn't -- tooltips stick when they shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 400000] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
** Visibility changed to: Public -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395281] Re: gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #587708 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587708 ** Also affects: gdm via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587708 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) -- gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395281] Re: gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad
Also, the ck-history code could not add users, but just update the frequency of existing users, avoiding this in that manner as well. Thanks, James -- gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395281] Re: gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad
gdm uses ck-history to find recent users that had ck sessions. We currently end up with ck sessions for some system users, so they can appear here, which should probably be fixed independently. gdm then parses this and removes some users based on a hard-coded exclude list, which doesn't include a lot of system users. It also filters users based on a minimum UID that is lower than the min UID for non-system users, so if someone has a lot of system users they will show up based on that. Suggested fix: * Increase the min UID * As users from /etc/passwd are excluded by the checks before the exclude check, add them to the exclude hash so that they don't enter the list via ck. Thanks, James -- gdm 2.26 criteria for which users shown in greeter list are bad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395281] Re: kernoops user is listed as real user in gdm 2.26.x
The kerneloops package correctly creates the user as a system user, so this seems to be a GDM issue. I can't see what is different about the kernoops user that makes it show up, is the only system user listed? Thanks, James ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- kernoops user is listed as real user in gdm 2.26.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 373906] Sync f-spot 0.5.0.3-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
[Updating] f-spot (0.5.0.3-3ubuntu1 [Ubuntu] < 0.5.0.3-4 [Debian]) * Trying to add f-spot... - - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> I: f-spot [main] -> f-spot_0.5.0.3-3ubuntu1 [main]. ** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Sync f-spot 0.5.0.3-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 374187] [NEW] including a file leads to confusion about whether md5 is being used
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: system-tools-backends In http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527952 Jan Christoph Nordholz reported that including a file would overwrite the value of use_md5. I haven't yet investigated what the impact of this would be. Thanks, James ** Affects: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** This bug has been flagged as a security vulnerability -- including a file leads to confusion about whether md5 is being used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 215472] Re: Darklooks gtkrc is broken [hardy-intrepid]
Fix confirmed, thanks. Release team, ok to upload this? Thanks, James -- Darklooks gtkrc is broken [hardy-intrepid] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gnome-themes-extras. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 215472] Re: Darklooks gtkrc is broken [hardy-intrepid]
** Changed in: gnome-themes-extras Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: gnome-themes-extras Status: Fix Committed => Unknown ** Changed in: gnome-themes-extras Remote watch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #528322 -- Darklooks gtkrc is broken [hardy-intrepid] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gnome-themes-extras. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 338867] Re: unable search for an application to open this file
Hi, My patch is in nautilus trunk, reducing the risk of including it in the package if that is the way we want to go. Thanks, James -- unable search for an application to open this file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 338867] Re: unable search for an application to open this file
Hi, I've attached a patch to the upstream bug report that detects packagekit and only offers to search if it is available. I think we should either disable this feature by default or use that patch (which I'm not totally confident about without review from upstream). There is a second issue complicating this though. If you have packagekit available and try to search then it will currently fail as our packagekit is too old. We could also patch that in nautilus, but that's extra work and more divergence (the patch would be much less risky though). I'd like the opinion of Sebastian and Sebastien as to what we should do for this release. Thanks, James -- unable search for an application to open this file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 338867] Re: unable search for an application to open this file
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #578238 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578238 ** Also affects: nautilus via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578238 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- unable search for an application to open this file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354990] Re: Nautilus assumes packagekit is available if it was compiled with packagekit support
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 338867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338867 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #578238 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578238 ** Also affects: nautilus via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578238 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Nautilus assumes packagekit is available if it was compiled with packagekit support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354990] Re: Nautilus should recommend installing Packagekit on unknown files
** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => nautilus (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - Nautilus should recommend installing Packagekit on unknown files + Nautilus assumes packagekit is available if it was compiled with packagekit support ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Nautilus assumes packagekit is available if it was compiled with packagekit support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192009] Re: gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear
Hi Damien, Federico has a request for you in the upstream bug: "To diagnose this we need the output of "xrandr -q" and "xprop -root". I wonder if the WM struts are wrong." if you have a GNOME bugzilla login you can answer directly in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562944 if not then answer here and we can relay the information. Thanks, James -- gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 192009] Re: gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 17:04 +, nickolai wrote: > > I don't see that this would have changed with this patch would it? > > Weren't both panels placed on the same screen before this change as > > well? > > Prior to this change, my gnome-panel would move to the top of the > combined desktop (top of the VGA screen), and there would be no instance > of gnome-panel anywhere on the LVDS screen. This allowed me to have > very tall windows that spanned multiple screens with little visual > interruption. Ah, You only have a single panel. A second panel would have used to have gone in the middle of the two screens. Yes, your case would be worse with this patch. This patch is a trade-off though, so there will be some. With xrandr 1.3 it will be possible to make the behaviour configurable, but that's not an option for Jaunty. Thanks, James -- gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 192009] Re: gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 16:11 +, nickolai wrote: > This change makes the multi-screen experience strictly worse in at least > one scenario, as follows. > > In my case, I have an external VGA screen that's smaller than my LVDS > screen, and physically placed above it. After running "xrandr --output > VGA --auto --above LVDS", my desktop extends upward to include the VGA > screen, but gnome-panel remains at the top of the LVDS screen (since > it's larger), in the middle of my logical desktop. This seems odd, > since windows that span both screens are now interrupted by a gnome- > panel. I don't see that this would have changed with this patch would it? Weren't both panels placed on the same screen before this change as well? > To make matters worse, when a new window is created and placed on the > LVDS screen, the window is aligned to the top of the LVDS screen, as > opposed to the bottom of the gnome-panel. As a result, the window's > title bar is placed below the overlapping gnome-panel, making it > difficult to move the window. This part I see as well, but I'm trying to work out which component is at fault to file a bug. Thanks, James -- gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 224229] Re: Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 18:34 +, Rick Spencer wrote: > It's great that there's a patch upstream. However, the engineers have > deemed this is too risky to take in 9.04. Look for this early in 9.10. > > Please note that the work around still works. Users must turn off compiz, by > going to: > System->Preferences->Appearance > then choosing "Visual Effects" tab, and setting it to "None". This will turn > off compiz and allow the window to be dragged above the frame. After this, > they can re-enable compiz on the same tab if desired. > There is also a gconf key you can set that allows you to move apps above the top of the screen under compiz. I'm not suggesting that it be the documented way to do this, but setting it by default could be an option. Apparently compiz upstream don't think you should be allowed to do it, because you can get in to a bad situation when you can't access a window anymore, which is why it is not the default, but it would be possible to override that. Also, I'm not sure I entirely agree with the argument as I phrased it as you still have alt-tab etc., but I may have incorrectly characterised their position. I don't have references to hand I'm afraid, but I found them originally with a minimal amount of googling. Thanks, James -- Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192009] Re: gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear
Hi, Here's a debdiff for this bug. I've tested it and it appears to do what it is supposed to for me. Thanks, James ** Attachment added: "gnome-panel.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24568834/gnome-panel.diff -- gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192009] Re: gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear
Hi, There is a patch in the upstream bug now that prefers LVDS outputs, which should give a better experience for laptop users as their panel will tend to stay on the laptop panel. It's partly just a stopgap until you can select the primary output in the capplet though. Would that patch be suitable for Jaunty? Thanks, James -- gnome panel has no way to specify on which screen it should appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 352033] [NEW] "mailto:" with attachments doesn't work due to not url-decoding the path
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I reported http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577375 about mailto not working with attach. This breaks "bzr send" which I use a lot, and so it is quite an irritation, though attaching the file by hand after the error works, though tedious. Thanks, James ** Affects: evolution Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #577375 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577375 ** Also affects: evolution via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577375 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- "mailto:"; with attachments doesn't work due to not url-decoding the path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352033 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349437] Re: System policy prevents stopping the system when other users are logged in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 287715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287715 Hi, Thanks for your report, this particular bug has already been report, but please file any others that you find. Thanks, James ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 287715 Trying to shut down or restart falsely suggests others are logged in -- System policy prevents stopping the system when other users are logged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 336295] Re: Changes needed for python2.6 transition
** Attachment added: "vtk.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23261460/vtk.diff ** Changed in: vtk (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: vte => vtk -- Changes needed for python2.6 transition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 336295] Re: Changes needed for python2.6 transition
** Attachment added: "vtk.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23261459/vtk.diff -- Changes needed for python2.6 transition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 336295] [NEW] Changes needed for python2.6 transition
Public bug reported: Hi, Here's the start of a patch for the python 2.6 transition, but it fails to build for me with: - Compiling VTK CMake commands - done -- Loading VTK CMake commands -- Loading VTK CMake commands - done -- Looking for doxygen... -- Looking for doxygen... - found /usr/bin/doxygen -- Looking for dot tool... -- Looking for dot tool... - found /usr/bin/dot -- Could NOT find Gnuplot (missing: GNUPLOT_EXECUTABLE) -- Qt3 and Qt4 cannot be used together in one project. CMake was unable to find desired QT version: 4. Set advanced values QT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE and QT4_QGLOBAL_FILE. CMake Error at GUISupport/Qt/CMakeLists.txt:20 (INCLUDE): include called with wrong number of arguments. Include only takes one file. CMake Error at GUISupport/Qt/CMakeLists.txt:34 (QT4_WRAP_CPP): Unknown CMake command "QT4_WRAP_CPP". -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! make: *** [install-qt4] Error 1 If someone knows how to fix that I would appreciate it. Thanks, James ** Affects: vtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Changes needed for python2.6 transition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 329245] Re: gnome-settings-daemon could use the new notification service
** Attachment added: "gsd.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22673486/gsd.diff -- gnome-settings-daemon could use the new notification service https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 329245] Re: gnome-settings-daemon could use the new notification service
Hi,
Here's a debdiff that applies against the current jaunty package. After
applying it you
need to regenerate the 90_autoreconf patch.
+if (!strcmp(cap, "canonical-private-1")) {
this is obviously not great, is there any effort to get this capability added
to the spec with
a well-known name?
Thanks,
James
--
gnome-settings-daemon could use the new notification service
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329245
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328596] Re: evolution shouldn't use notifications with actions
Hi, "This should be replaced by the message status menu." It's a bit difficult to know what to do here without a specification for this. Is there something we can do with evolution in Jaunty in the meantime? Is this something which will land for jaunty? Is there something we can do that will work whether we have the message status menu or not? Thanks, James ** Summary changed: - evolution shouldn't use notifications with actionsdx + evolution shouldn't use notifications with actions ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- evolution shouldn't use notifications with actions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328596 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 322740] Please sync gtkspell 2.0.13-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
[Updating] gtkspell (2.0.13-1 [Ubuntu] < 2.0.13-2 [Debian]) * Trying to add gtkspell... - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> - - http://ftp.debian.org/debian/> I: gtkspell [main] -> libgtkspell0_2.0.13-1 [main]. I: gtkspell [main] -> libgtkspell-dev_2.0.13-1 [main]. ** Changed in: gtkspell (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Please sync gtkspell 2.0.13-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkspell in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 312875] Re: E: totem-common: sub-processo post-installation script retornou estado de saída de erro 134 E: totem-gstreamer: problemas de depend ência - deixando desconfigurado E: totem-plugins:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 218049 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218049 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 218049 scrollkeeper-update failed with "corrupted double-linked list" during update-manager update -- E: totem-common: sub-processo post-installation script retornou estado de saída de erro 134 E: totem-gstreamer: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado E: totem-plugins: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado E: totem: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado E: totem-mozilla: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312875 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 5890] Re: Video Out GUI
Hi Martin, I did not forward this bug, I just noted in launchpad that it should be forwarded. If you are familiar with what features would be desired in a Video Out GUI then please report a bug on bugzilla.gnome.org and report the bug number back here. Thanks, James -- Video Out GUI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 279569] Re: Screennresolution applet no longer asks for confirmation of new resolution settings
** Summary changed: - Screennresolution applet no longer ask if you wan't to keep new resolution settings + Screennresolution applet no longer asks for confirmation of new resolution settings -- Screennresolution applet no longer asks for confirmation of new resolution settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 302378] Re: lack of "confirm change of resolution" button in gnome
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 279569 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279569 Hi, The file you are looking for is ~/.config/monitors.xml Thanks, James ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 279569 Screennresolution applet no longer asks for confirmation of new resolution settings -- lack of "confirm change of resolution" button in gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 173212] Re: muted output becomes volume == 0 on session restart
** Summary changed: - mixer applet cannot be unmuted in new session + muted output becomes volume == 0 on session restart ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: gnome-applets - Hi, If I leave the mixer muted (with the mute control, rather than zeroing the volume) - when I logout, when I next log in I cannot unmute the volume. - - The icon shows muted, but the checkbox in the popup menu for "mute" is - not selected. However selecting and un-selecting the checkbox to has - no effect: the sound is still muted, and the icon still indicates that. + when I logout, when I next log in the volume is set to 0. I am able to unmute the sound by raising the volume using the slider or the mouse wheel. + Steps to reproduce: + 1. Have audio output at e.g. 50% + 2. Mute the output, check that the volume slider is still shown at the same level. + 3. Restart the session. + 4. Note that the output no longer has the mute checkbox on, but the volume is + at 0%. + + I believe this inconsistency is a bug. + Thanks, James ** Description changed: Hi, If I leave the mixer muted (with the mute control, rather than zeroing the volume) when I logout, when I next log in the volume is set to 0. I am able to unmute the sound by raising the volume using the slider or the mouse wheel. Steps to reproduce: 1. Have audio output at e.g. 50% 2. Mute the output, check that the volume slider is still shown at the same level. 3. Restart the session. 4. Note that the output no longer has the mute checkbox on, but the volume is at 0%. I believe this inconsistency is a bug. + I only see it on my snd_emu10k1 system, not on my snd_hda_intel system. + + I have seen this problem since gutsy, but the symptoms changed slightly, + presumably with the move to pulseaudio. + Thanks, James -- muted output becomes volume == 0 on session restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225941] Re: undo does not work on deleted items
** Changed in: alacarte (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- undo does not work on deleted items https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to alacarte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora
I meant that the regression in xournal isn't present, the original redraw problem probably are. Thanks, James -- [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 272316] Re: [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora
Hi, Please close the Debian bug, this problem is not present in Debian. Thanks, James -- [regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 293209] Re: External display - 1440x900 resolution not detected
Hi, You have a Virtual option set in your xorg.conf, and that is preventing it from using the larger resolutions. Has the tool ever offered to change this so that you could use dual screens (it asks you to confirm, then does it and asks you to restart your session)? Thanks, James -- External display - 1440x900 resolution not detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 293209] [NEW] External display - 1440x900 resolution not detected
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:57 +, kuckus wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Binary package hint: gnome-control-center > > I'm on Ubuntu 8.10 and running into problems getting my second LCD > configured for its native resolution of 1440x900. > > Primary display is my IBM ThinkPad X41's 1024x768 LCD, the external > display is a 19" wide-screen Acer AL1916W. The Acer is connected to the > ThinkPad's VGA port (Intel 915GM, I think). > > Now using the new screen resolution applet on 8.10, the only 16:9 > resolution that is offered is 1360x768, it is not possible to select > 1440x900. > > Attached please find the output of `lspci --vvnn` and `dmesg`. Hi, Does the "xrandr" command show the correct resolution for your external monitor? Please attach the output of running "xrandr" from the command line here. Please also attach your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and your /var/log/Xorg.0.log. Thanks, James -- External display - 1440x900 resolution not detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 288617] Re: suspend to ram
Not a problem in fast-user-switch-applet. ** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- suspend to ram https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 271715] Re: intrepid - gedit-plugins - character map plugin greyed out when enabled
I will upload shortly. Thanks, James ** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- intrepid - gedit-plugins - character map plugin greyed out when enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit-plugins in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 272093] Re: Intrepid: Unable to start the settings manager gnome-settings-daemon
Hi, Anyone that is still seeing this bug is probably hitting bug 287448. Thanks, James -- Intrepid: Unable to start the settings manager gnome-settings-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260918] Re: needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or "gspca stopped working in 2.6.27")
bug 281600 also looks like it could be relevant. Thanks, James -- needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or "gspca stopped working in 2.6.27") https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for ekiga. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 256329] Re: screenlets-daemon.py crashed with IndexError in __init__()
Julien, it sounds like this gtk change will affect more than Ubuntu users later on, are you sure the Screenlets task should be Invalid? Thanks, James -- screenlets-daemon.py crashed with IndexError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygtk in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 256329] Re: screenlets-daemon.py crashed with IndexError in __init__()
Hi, I'm closing the pygtk task as the bug is already open separately. Thanks, James ** Changed in: pygtk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- screenlets-daemon.py crashed with IndexError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygtk in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 256329] Re: screenlets-daemon.py crashed with IndexError in __init__()
Uploaded, thank you. James ** Changed in: screenlets (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- screenlets-daemon.py crashed with IndexError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygtk in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 286578] Re: Please sponsor gedit-plugins 2.22.4 into intrepid
Uploaded, thank you. James ** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- Please sponsor gedit-plugins 2.22.4 into intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit-plugins in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260918] Re: needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or "gspca stopped working in 2.6.27")
Hi, A fixed package has already been uploaded. Thanks, James -- needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or "gspca stopped working in 2.6.27") https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for ekiga. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260918] Re: needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or "gspca stopped working in 2.6.27")
Hi, It appears that the v4l patch was accidentally dropped in the last upload of gst-plugins-good0.10. I'll ask Seb to check and correct this. Thanks, James -- needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or "gspca stopped working in 2.6.27") https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for ekiga. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285367] Re: Appearence settings don't seem to be applied on session startup
Hi, If you don't run gnome-settings-daemon then there is nothing to set the theme, and so this is expected behaviour. I therefore close the bug. Thanks, James ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Appearence settings don't seem to be applied on session startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285608] Re: rotate the screen problem
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 280798 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280798 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 280798 gnome-display-properties dont allow me rotate screen rigth and left but xrandr works fine -- rotate the screen problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 280798). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 29787] Re: Backspace key in GNU Screen not detected correctly
Hi, I'm closing the xfce4-terminal task, as that uses vte, so if vte is fixed xfce4-terminal will be fixed. Thanks, James ** Changed in: xfce4-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Backspace key in GNU Screen not detected correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 284906] Re: Calendar event from outlook 2007 doesnt trap as calendar email on imap
** Attachment removed: "This is the meeting event which i have revceived from microsoft outlook 2007 client." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18634730/meeting_event_outlook2007.png -- Calendar event from outlook 2007 doesnt trap as calendar email on imap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285367] Re: Appearence settings don't seem to be applied on session startup
Hi, When you start your session and don't have your custom theme, can you tell us if "gnome-settings-daemon" is running? Could you also attach your ~/.xsession-errors file to the report please? Thanks, James ** Summary changed: - [Intrepid] Appearence settings don't seem to be applied on session startup + Appearence settings don't seem to be applied on session startup -- Appearence settings don't seem to be applied on session startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225941] Re: undo does not work on deleted items
Hi, Here's a tested patch against the Intrepid version. Please sponsor in to Intrepid. Thanks, James ** Attachment added: "alacarte_0.11.6-0ubuntu2.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18577784/alacarte_0.11.6-0ubuntu2.diff -- undo does not work on deleted items https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to alacarte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashes on low battery
** Tags added: regression-potential ** Tags removed: regression -- gnome-power-manager crashes on low battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 280798] Re: gnome-display-properties dont allow me rotate screen rigth and left but xrandr works fine
** Tags added: gnome-display-properties -- gnome-display-properties dont allow me rotate screen rigth and left but xrandr works fine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 282739] Re: Changing Resolution in Monitor Resolution Settings has no effect
Hi, Thanks for testing. It sounds like the problem is indeed with the gnome-display-properties tool. I'm not sure what it would be though. Thanks, James ** Tags added: gnome-display-properties -- Changing Resolution in Monitor Resolution Settings has no effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashes on low battery
** Attachment added: "gnome-power-manager_2.24.0-0ubuntu5.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18528241/gnome-power-manager_2.24.0-0ubuntu5.diff ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: James Westby (james-w) => (unassigned) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- gnome-power-manager crashes on low battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashes on low battery
Hi, Please sponsor this change in to Intrepid. Thanks, James ** Attachment added: "gnome-power-manager_2.24.0-0ubuntu5.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18528185/gnome-power-manager_2.24.0-0ubuntu5.diff ** Attachment removed: "gnome-power-manager_2.24.0-0ubuntu5.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18528185/gnome-power- manager_2.24.0-0ubuntu5.diff -- gnome-power-manager crashes on low battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 282739] Re: Changing Resolution in Monitor Resolution Settings has no effect
Hi Richard, Are you able to change resolutions using the "xrandr" command line tool? Thanks, James -- Changing Resolution in Monitor Resolution Settings has no effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 283079] [NEW] volume step is too large, and cannot be reduced
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 07:33 +, Andrew Bennetts wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon > > I recently upgraded to Intrepid. > > When I press the volume up/down keys on my laptop, the volume OSD > appears and shows that the volume changes. Unfortunately it gives me > very little granularity: I can have either 25%, 51%, 77% or 100% going > up from muted, or 74%, 48% or 22% going down from 100%. I almost always > want a volume somewhere in between these values (48% is typically much > too soft, and 74% is typically too loud). > Hi Andrew, Please open a terminal and run "xev" then while it is running press to change the volume by one step using the volume keys. Do you get a single keypress, or multiple? Thanks, James -- volume step is too large, and cannot be reduced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
Hi, I believe that I have a fix for the bug. I have someone testing the patch, and if they show that it is good then I will organise an upload. Thanks, James ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => James Westby (james-w) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260894] Re: Gnome Power Manager Crashes everytime after login
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 269083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 269083 gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- Gnome Power Manager Crashes everytime after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260894] Re: Gnome Power Manager Crashes everytime after login
Hi, I agree with the duplicate possibility, and so I think your bug is a duplicate of bug 269083, so I marked it as such. If you receive any crashes with the fixed version of the package (which I am preparing now), please again use apport to submit them, and we can examine them. Thanks, James -- Gnome Power Manager Crashes everytime after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269049] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_closure_invoke()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 269083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 Hi, I believe your bug is a duplicate of bug 269083, so I have marked it as such. If you get any more crashes after uploading to the fixed version of the package (which I am preparing now), then please submit them using apport and we will be able to consider your report. Thanks, James ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 269083 gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269049 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
