[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2023215] Re: [SRU] appstream-glib can't handle em or code tags, breaking Flathub

2024-01-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Oh no, I thought this was live!
As far as I know, Flathub might be switching to modern AppStream again soon (if 
it didn't do that already even).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream-glib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023215

Title:
  [SRU] appstream-glib can't handle em or code tags, breaking Flathub

Status in appstream-glib package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream-glib source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in appstream-glib source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * Currently, any application that is using modern AppStream metadata 
containing / tags in their description, and that is still using the 
deprecated appstream-glib will fail to parse this data.
   * Unfortunately, this affects some high-visibility applications now, like 
Flatpak, which are unable to perform proper searches. See 
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/5434 for reference.
   * This kind of issue may potentially affect more tools as well.

  [ Test Plan ]

  1. Open a terminal and run
  sudo apt install flatpak

  2. Then run
  flatpak remote-add --if-not-exists flathub 
https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo

  3. Run
  flatpak search meld

  The broken output may look something like:
  F: Failed to parse 
/var/lib/flatpak/appstream/flathub/x86_64/active/appstream.xml.gz file: Error 
on line 1960 char 29:  already set '
    Organic Maps is a free Android & iOS offline maps app for travelers,
    tourists, hikers, and cyclists.
    It uses crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data and is developed with love by
    ' and tried to replace with ' ('
  No matches found

  4. Install the updated appstream-glib packages.

  5. Restart your computer then log back in.

  6. Open a terminal and run
  flatpak search meld

  The working output looks something like
  Name   DescriptionApplication ID   Version  Branch  
Remotes
  Meld   Compare and merge your files   org.gnome.meld   3.22.0   stable  
flathub

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * The reverse-dependencies for appstream-glib in Ubuntu Jammy are:
    flatpak-tests
    unity
    libmalcontent-ui-0-0
    libappstream-glib-dev
    gir1.2-appstreamglib-1.0
    appstream-util
    flatpak

   * Flatpak should continue to work, and there should be no new errors
  in GNOME/Unity.

  [ Other Info ]

   * None. Updating this should mainly help Flatpak users and should
  have no ill effects on any other component of the OS.

  * This issue was fixed upstream in appstream-glib 0.8.1 which is
  available in Ubuntu 22.10 and newer releases.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/2023215/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2006110] Re: [SRU] Update to 0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

2023-06-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Since it's a race condition, it's hard to reproduce. The most reliable way to 
do so is with Flatpak 1.14.x, which isn't part of Jammy.
So, if you're fine with having this potential issue for other tools in the OS, 
that apparently isn't triggered by anything currently in Jammy, then this 
doesn't need to be addressed.

The more important immediate issue is the one in appstream-glib, and
that's being fixed :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006110

Title:
  [SRU] Update to 0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

Status in Flatpak:
  New
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  The attached debdiff contains two targeted fixes to address noisy
  warning messages when AppStream is used with newer Flatpak versions.

  [ Impact ]

   * Appstream is used by GNOME Software, KDE Discover, Flatpak, Snaps
  and probably lot of other components. However, this fix has already
  been well-tested for over a year.

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Open GNOME Software and KDE Discover and see that it is still
  populated with data.

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * If GNOME Software / KDE Discover still show all applications, everything 
should be fine, as this is the codepath this change touches.
   * `apt update` should not emit any warning messages from AppStream.

  [ Other Info ]

   *

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/flatpak/+bug/2006110/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2023215] [NEW] [SRU] Update to 0.7.18-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

2023-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

[ Impact ]

 * Currently, any application that is using modern AppStream metadata 
containing / tags in their description, and that is still using the 
deprecated appstream-glib will fail to parse this data.
 * Unfortunately, this affects some high-visibility applications now, like 
Flatpak, which are unable to perform proper searches. See 
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/5434 for reference.
 * This kind of issue may potentially affect more tools as well.

[ Test Plan ]

 * Run "flatpak search firefox"
   - Observe the failure.
 * Update to the patched version
 * Run "flatpak search firefox" again, it should work now.

[ Where problems could occur ]

 * The reverse-dependencies for appstream-glib in Ubuntu Jammy are:
  flatpak-tests
  unity
  libmalcontent-ui-0-0
  libappstream-glib-dev
  gir1.2-appstreamglib-1.0
  appstream-util
  flatpak

 * Flatpak should continue to work, and there should be no new errors in
GNOME/Unity.

[ Other Info ]
 
 * None. Updating this should mainly help Flatpak users and should have no ill 
effects on any other component of the OS.

** Affects: appstream-glib (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: appstream-glib (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Patch added: "appstream-glib_0.7.18-2_to_0.7.18-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023215/+attachment/5678475/+files/appstream-glib_0.7.18-2_to_0.7.18-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff

** Also affects: appstream-glib (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream-glib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023215

Title:
  [SRU] Update to 0.7.18-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

Status in appstream-glib package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in appstream-glib source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * Currently, any application that is using modern AppStream metadata 
containing / tags in their description, and that is still using the 
deprecated appstream-glib will fail to parse this data.
   * Unfortunately, this affects some high-visibility applications now, like 
Flatpak, which are unable to perform proper searches. See 
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/5434 for reference.
   * This kind of issue may potentially affect more tools as well.

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Run "flatpak search firefox"
 - Observe the failure.
   * Update to the patched version
   * Run "flatpak search firefox" again, it should work now.

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * The reverse-dependencies for appstream-glib in Ubuntu Jammy are:
flatpak-tests
unity
libmalcontent-ui-0-0
libappstream-glib-dev
gir1.2-appstreamglib-1.0
appstream-util
flatpak

   * Flatpak should continue to work, and there should be no new errors
  in GNOME/Unity.

  [ Other Info ]
   
   * None. Updating this should mainly help Flatpak users and should have no 
ill effects on any other component of the OS.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/2023215/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2006110] Re: [SRU] Update to 0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

2023-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This debdiff contains a minimal fix to resolve the noisy assertions (and
potential crash) when searching for AppStream data.

It should be suitable for upload to Jammy.
@tintou, sorry for hijacking the SRU report a bit, in hindsight I should 
probably have filed a new one. This should address the most visible issue 
though without any risk of introducing new problems.

(It would still be nice to have a more recent AppStream in Jammy, but we
can request that later)

** Summary changed:

- [SRU] Update to latest bugfix release for jammy
+ [SRU] Update to 0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

** Description changed:

- Appstream 0.15.6 is available since December, 2022 and comes with lots
- of crash fixes
+ The attached debdiff contains two targeted fixes to address noisy
+ warning messages when AppStream is used with newer Flatpak versions.
  
  [ Impact ]
  
-  * Appstream is used by GNOME Software, KDE Discover, Flatpak, Snaps and
- probably lot of other components, since the release of Jammy, a few
- point releases have been made to appstream that fixes crashes and
- optimizations.
+  * Appstream is used by GNOME Software, KDE Discover, Flatpak, Snaps and
+ probably lot of other components. However, this fix has already been
+ well-tested for over a year.
  
  [ Test Plan ]
  
-  * Open GNOME Software and KDE Discover and see that it is still
- populatedwith data
+  * Open GNOME Software and KDE Discover and see that it is still
+ populated with data.
  
  [ Where problems could occur ]
  
-  * GNOME Software and KDE Discover could be affected by a sudden crashes
- but that is unlikely.
+  * If GNOME Software / KDE Discover still show all applications, everything 
should be fine, as this is the codepath this change touches.
+  * `apt update` should not emit any warning messages from AppStream.
  
  [ Other Info ]
-  
-  *
+ 
+  *

** Patch added: "appstream_0.15.2-2_to_0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/2006110/+attachment/5678473/+files/appstream_0.15.2-2_to_0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff

** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006110

Title:
  [SRU] Update to 0.15.2-2ubuntu0.1 for jammy

Status in Flatpak:
  New
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in appstream source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  The attached debdiff contains two targeted fixes to address noisy
  warning messages when AppStream is used with newer Flatpak versions.

  [ Impact ]

   * Appstream is used by GNOME Software, KDE Discover, Flatpak, Snaps
  and probably lot of other components. However, this fix has already
  been well-tested for over a year.

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Open GNOME Software and KDE Discover and see that it is still
  populated with data.

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * If GNOME Software / KDE Discover still show all applications, everything 
should be fine, as this is the codepath this change touches.
   * `apt update` should not emit any warning messages from AppStream.

  [ Other Info ]

   *

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/flatpak/+bug/2006110/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2019505] Re: Installed software is not showed, local deb files or compiled one in gnome software store

2023-05-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
If the package installs a metainfo file into `/usr/share/metainfo` it
should be displayed. Otherwise it will not be displayed, and that is a
design decision by GNOME Software as not enough metadata is available.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019505

Title:
  Installed software is not showed, local deb files or compiled one in
  gnome software store

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Installing software via gnome software store  that has been downloaded
  from websites does not show in gnome software as installed. Same
  applies to source installs.

  The issue is present regardless of flavor and in 22.04, 22.10 and
  23.04 release.

  Looking on the internet about people having similar problem, I found
  that it could be related to the appstream; to quote Zorin OS devs that
  answered to someone with similar problem with their distro:

  "The Gnome Software Store will not recognize packages installed as .deb 
self-installers. Nor will it see source installs using Make or Ninja."
  "Since this is an appstream metadata issue, no one on the forum can "fix" 
this issue. Only the Gnome Developers can and they were more interested only in 
fixing anything in Gnome-Software that was going into Gnome 4+. There are some 
short term workarounds, like removing the Software Cache files and restarting 
the software store."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2019505/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2019137] Re: gnome-software should (?) be separated from the packagekit

2023-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Not sure what you mean, but a GNOME Software with no PackageKit would mean that 
users are completely unable to install or remove any application from the 
Ubuntu archive, in addition to flavors not being able to use offline upgrades 
anymore.
So this sounds like a suggestion with tons of huge drawbacks and annoyances to 
users, and no (?) advantage at all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019137

Title:
  gnome-software should (?) be separated from the packagekit

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Given that the Snap Store is currently the default in Ubuntu instead
  of GNOME Software, the only reason GNOME Software (along with the Snap
  Store) can be installed is to support Flatpak applications.

  In the current instance, if you want to add flatpak support, GNOME
  Software is installed with both the apt packagekit add-on and the
  flatpak plugin, which is duplication of work (Software Updater already
  works on updates, and Snap Store works on showing deb apps).

  And since the future app store explicitly refuses [1], [2] to support
  flatpak applications, users who need this package format will be
  forced to put GNOME Software with everything I pointed out above.

  Therefore, it would be very nice if the developers removed the
  packagekit add-on from the "gnome-software part" and made it a "plug-
  in for gnome-software".

  I, unfortunately, have no such experience with packaging deb packages
  at the moment, and it turns out that it will obviously be necessary to
  work out both the code part (which, as far as I can see, won't be very
  difficult [3]), as well as the part where we will have to figure out
  where and how to insert the plugin as mandatory (for example, when the
  user completely gives up on snap packages) and as optional (because
  the Snap Store already stands).

  Also, let me know if this needs to be sent to upstream (Debian) instead of 
here.
  
---
  1. https://github.com/ubuntu-flutter-community/software/issues/126
  2. https://github.com/ubuntu-flutter-community/software/issues/30
  3. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1031279

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2019137/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2006110] Re: [SRU] Update to latest bugfix release for jammy

2023-02-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
In any case, don't take 0.16.0 without this patch:
https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/631303a8d16c2f608428a89bb94511bc28ae5417
- otherwise anything that's using GIR bindings will crash. I will be
making an emergency 0.16.1 release soon, and all previous releases are
perfectly fine and well tested too :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006110

Title:
  [SRU] Update to latest bugfix release for jammy

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Appstream 0.15.6 is available since December, 2022 and comes with lots
  of crash fixes

  [ Impact ]

   * Appstream is used by GNOME Software, KDE Discover, Flatpak, Snaps
  and probably lot of other components, since the release of Jammy, a
  few point releases have been made to appstream that fixes crashes and
  optimizations.

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Open GNOME Software and KDE Discover and see that it is still
  populatedwith data

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * GNOME Software and KDE Discover could be affected by a sudden
  crashes but that is unlikely.

  [ Other Info ]
   
   *

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/2006110/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1991809] Re: App search based on mime type returns nothing

2022-10-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You can verify whether this is an issue with GNOME Software or your metadata by 
opening a terminal and running this command:
appstreamcli what-provides mediatype application/epub+zip

If that yields results, it means that you have the metadata but GNOME
Software doesn't read ir properly for some reason.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991809

Title:
  App search based on mime type returns nothing

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When trying to open a file which has no apps associated in nautilus
  like a .epub

  You have the button " look for compatible apps" which is great

  however , gnome-software returns no apps for "application/epub+zip"
  mime type althou calibre and others can handle them

  is this a problem with appsstream ?

  I think THIS IS a very important feature ..

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-software 41.5-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54-generic 5.15.53
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct  5 16:34:08 2022
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak 41.5-2ubuntu2
   gnome-software-plugin-snap41.5-2ubuntu2
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1991809/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1601971] Re: update fails, "AppStream cache update failed."

2022-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this still an issue in Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy)? (Pretty much none of the
code used in Xenial exists anymore in its previous form)

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601971

Title:
  update fails, "AppStream cache update failed."

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Booted 16.04 amd64 from DVD, opened a gnome-terminal and ran,

  ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update
  Ign:1 cdrom://Ubuntu 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.1) 
xenial InRelease
  Hit:2 cdrom://Ubuntu 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.1) 
xenial Release
  Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease [247 kB]  
 
  Get:5 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease [94.5 kB]   
 
  Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease [94.5 kB]
  Get:7 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 Packages 
[119 kB]
  Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages [1,201 kB]
  Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main Translation-en [568 kB]
   
  Get:10 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/main Translation-en 
[45.3 kB]
  Get:11 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 DEP-11 
Metadata [44.0 kB]
  Get:12 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/main DEP-11 64x64 
Icons [50.8 kB]
  Get:13 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/restricted amd64 
DEP-11 Metadata [158 B]
  Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 DEP-11 Metadata 
[733 kB]
  Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main DEP-11 64x64 Icons [409 
kB]
  Get:16 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages 
[252 kB]
  Get:17 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main Translation-en 
[99.8 kB]
  Get:18 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 DEP-11 
Metadata [186 kB]
  Get:19 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main DEP-11 64x64 
Icons [150 kB]
  Get:20 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/restricted amd64 
DEP-11 Metadata [157 B]
  Fetched 4,293 kB in 1s (2,360 kB/s) 

  ** (appstreamcli:2593): CRITICAL **: Error while moving old database out of 
the way.
  AppStream cache update failed.
  Reading package lists... Done

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: appstream 0.9.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperVersion: 1.376
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Jul 11 19:24:40 2016
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1601971/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1710209] Re: package libappstream3 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 [modified: usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/

2022-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this still an issue?

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710209

Title:
  package libappstream3 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 [modified:
  usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
  install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared
  '/usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different
  from other instances of package libappstream3:i386

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  .

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: libappstream3 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 [modified: 
usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-58.63~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-58-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Fri Aug 11 07:58:41 2017
  DpkgHistoryLog:
   Start-Date: 2017-08-11  07:58:37
   Commandline: apt-get -f install
   Requested-By: mike (1000)
   Upgrade: libappstream3:i386 (0.9.4-1ubuntu1, 0.9.4-1ubuntu3)
  DpkgTerminalLog:
   Preparing to unpack .../libappstream3_0.9.4-1ubuntu3_i386.deb ...
   Unpacking libappstream3:i386 (0.9.4-1ubuntu3) over (0.9.4-1ubuntu1) ...
   dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libappstream3_0.9.4-1ubuntu3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libappstream3:i386
  DuplicateSignature:
   package:libappstream3:0.9.4-1ubuntu3 [modified: 
usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz]
   Unpacking libappstream3:i386 (0.9.4-1ubuntu3) over (0.9.4-1ubuntu1) ...
   dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libappstream3_0.9.4-1ubuntu3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libappstream3:i386
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libappstream3:i386
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-20 (171 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215.2)
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2
   apt  1.2.20
  SourcePackage: appstream
  Title: package libappstream3 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 [modified: 
usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libappstream3/changelog.Debian.gz', 
which is different from other instances of package libappstream3:i386
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1710209/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982198] Re: apt update: Can not add an empty (zero-length) key to the cache

2022-08-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This issue does not longer exist in appstream since jammy - so the
quickest fix is to simply upgrade to that release.

** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982198

Title:
  apt update: Can not add an empty (zero-length) key to the cache

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  When running sudo apt update, I get the following warning after the
  "Fetched" message:

  Can not add an empty (zero-length) key to the cache

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: apt 2.0.9
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44~20.04.1-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jul 19 16:44:36 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-26 (84 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1982198/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1983112] Re: Appstream does not install config file

2022-08-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Very odd... There is nothing special about this config file (it's installed 
like every other) and this works absolutely fine on Debian and even my Ubuntu 
VM.
So, something very odd and possibly uBUNTU-SPECIFIC is going on here...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983112

Title:
  Appstream does not install config file

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After performing an Ubuntu automated server install, and installing
  the ubuntu-desktop-minimal package (which includes appstream as a
  dependency) then the snap-store, the snap-store will fail to display
  search results for .deb packages in the Ubuntu apt repositories.

  This is due to a missing config file (/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50appstream)
  which is supposed to be installed as part of the appstream package.

  The issue can be fixed by re-installing appstream with the following 
command-line:
  apt-get -y install --reinstall -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confmiss" appstream

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: appstream 0.15.2-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Jul 29 15:25:44 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-07-27 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220421)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1983112/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1983112] Re: Appstream does not install config file

2022-07-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Did you manually remove the config file before attempting to restore it? 
Because AFAIK `--force-confmiss` will only make the file show up again if it 
was modified compared to the previously deleted version, but otherwise leave it 
deleted in case the user has removed it.
I think you need the whole triplet of `--force-confask,confnew,confmiss` to 
actually get the file back.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983112

Title:
  Appstream does not install config file

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After performing an Ubuntu automated server install, and installing
  the ubuntu-desktop-minimal package (which includes appstream as a
  dependency) then the snap-store, the snap-store will fail to display
  search results for .deb packages in the Ubuntu apt repositories.

  This is due to a missing config file (/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50appstream)
  which is supposed to be installed as part of the appstream package.

  The issue can be fixed by re-installing appstream with the following 
command-line:
  apt-get -y install --reinstall -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confmiss" appstream

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: appstream 0.15.2-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Jul 29 15:25:44 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-07-27 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220421)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1983112/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1968405] Re: yaru-theme-gnome-shell fails to install ["/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-new": No such file or directory]

2022-04-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I can confirm this bug, and it is not a space issue.
The problem is that is a symbolic link that messes with dpkg unpacking:
ls -lha /usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Feb  6  2020 /usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell -> 
../../gnome-shell/theme/Yaru

This currently prevents updates to Jammy (unless you delete the symlink
first).

** Also affects: yaru-theme (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to yaru-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968405

Title:
  yaru-theme-gnome-shell fails to install
  ["/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-
  new": No such file or directory]

Status in yaru-theme package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in yaru-theme source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The upgrade from Ubuntu 21.10 to 22.04 - Ubuntu Jammy Jellyfish (development 
branch) - stopped.
  An "apt install -f" shows that a file is missing in the Yaru package:

  -
  root@besa:/home/daniele/Downloads# apt install -f
  Lettura elenco dei pacchetti... Fatto
  Generazione albero delle dipendenze... Fatto
  Lettura informazioni sullo stato... Fatto   
  Correzione delle dipendenze... Fatto
  I seguenti pacchetti aggiuntivi saranno inoltre installati:
yaru-theme-gnome-shell
  I seguenti pacchetti saranno aggiornati:
yaru-theme-gnome-shell
  1 aggiornati, 0 installati, 0 da rimuovere e 0 non aggiornati.
  4 non completamente installati o rimossi.
  È necessario scaricare 0 B/85,4 kB di archivi.
  Dopo quest'operazione, verranno occupati 14,9 MB di spazio su disco.
  Continuare? [Y/n] 
  (Lettura del database... 392424 file e directory attualmente installati.)
  Preparativi per estrarre .../yaru-theme-gnome-shell_22.04.3.1_all.deb...
  Estrazione di yaru-theme-gnome-shell (22.04.3.1) su (21.10.2)...
  dpkg: errore nell'elaborare l'archivio 
/var/cache/apt/archives/yaru-theme-gnome-shell_22.04.3.1_all.deb (--unpack):
   impossibile aprire 
"/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-new": No such 
file or directory
  Segnalazione apport non scritta poiché il messaggio di errore indica un 
errore nel sistema locale.

Si sono verificati degli errori nell'elaborazione:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/yaru-theme-gnome-shell_22.04.3.1_all.deb
  

  
  The error line is:
  "/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-new": No 
such file or directory

  I unpacked the deb file and indeed there's no calendar-today-
  light.svg.dpkg-new file, the right name is calendar-today-light.svg

  
  It looks like a bug.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yaru-theme/+bug/1968405/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1958721] Re: appstreamcli refresh-cache reports MDB_MAP_FULL

2022-01-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You have a cache bigger than 256MB?? This issue is already fixed with
appstream 0.15.0, but I still would like to know why your cache is so
huge. What's you system locale?

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04

** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Medium
   Status: Fix Released

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu Jammy)
Milestone: ubuntu-22.04 => None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958721

Title:
  appstreamcli refresh-cache reports MDB_MAP_FULL

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream source package in Impish:
  New
Status in appstream source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  On Ubuntu 21.10 aarch64 AppStream version: 0.14.5

  I get the following error:
  % sudo appstreamcli refresh-cache --force
  Unable to add data: MDB_MAP_FULL: Environment mapsize limit reached

  Using: 
  sudo ltrace -f -l liblmdb.so.0 appstreamcli refresh-cache

  I see that the DB is initialized with a 256MB size
  [pid 244512] libappstream.so.4->mdb_env_set_mapsize(0xd38f46e0, 
0x1000, 0xd38f46e0, 0) = 0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1958721/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1927149] Re: Irrelevant translatable strings

2021-09-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I still think this is a dumb fix, especially since you loose the feature to 
actually mark strings from being untranslatable by dropping the appstream 
dependency.
A proper workaround would be to leave that in, possibly backport the ITS patch 
for appstream to update the file, and then mark the release entries you don't 
want to have translated with `translate="no"` in the XML.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927149

Title:
  Irrelevant translatable strings

Status in AppStream:
  Unknown
Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store-desktop:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  When building gnome-software on Ubuntu, dh_translations generates a
  translation template (.pot file) to be imported to Rosetta. That
  template includes 700+ log messages from
  data/appdata/org.gnome.Software.appdata.xml.in. The messages are not
  shown to users, and it makes no sense to have those strings
  translated. It's worth mentioning that the strings are excluded in
  upstream's translation template.

  The issue was first reported at the ubuntu-translators mailing list:
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-translators/2021-May/007757.html

  I stripped the redundant strings from the template and uploaded it to
  hirsute manually as a temporary measure.

  The reason why this happens seems to be that the appstream package is
  included in Build-Depends. appstream installs the file
  /usr/share/gettext/its/metainfo.its with rules which make all the log
  entries be extracted. But the gettext package installs
  /usr/share/gettext-0.21/its/metainfo.its with more sensible rules
  which do not make the log entries be extracted. If the former is not
  present, xgettext falls back to the latter.

  So a solution to this issue is to drop appstream from Build-Depends.
  gnome-software seems to build fine without that package (tested in
  PPA).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1927149/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
How does the `project_license` tag in Wesnoths AppStream MetaInfo file
look like? Because that's the thing that is looked at to determine
whether the license is free.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926104

Title:
  Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in wesnoth-1.14 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Wesnoth is not under a proprietary license and should not be listed as
  such in the Ubuntu software center.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1926104/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1782304] Re: package libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting confi

2021-01-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not a problem in "appstream", it's usually a package manager issue, 
e.g. if there was a power outage during upgrades or install/remove steps. In 
this case, it just randomly hit the appstream package.
If the APT installation is fixed, this problem should go away. Please file an 
issue against APT in case this is a persistent problem!

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782304

Title:
  package libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it
  before attempting configuration

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  i had been receiving error message on start up

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-45.50~16.04.1-generic 4.13.16
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-45-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
  AptOrdering:
   apache2-doc: Install
   libappstream3: Configure
   appstream: Configure
   apache2-doc: Configure
   NULL: ConfigurePending
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jul 17 16:20:56 2018
  DuplicateSignature:
   package:libappstream3:amd64:0.9.4-1ubuntu3
   Processing triggers for doc-base (0.10.7) ...
   Processing 1 added doc-base file...
   dpkg: error processing package libappstream3:amd64 (--configure):
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
  ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  
reinstall it before attempting configuration
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-03-11 (129 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215.2)
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.4
   apt  1.2.27
  SourcePackage: appstream
  Title: package libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: 
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before 
attempting configuration
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1782304/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1903574] Re: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2020-12-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Not really fixed, AppStream has an incomplete workaround for the
gobject-introspection bug (which may break at any time for new functions
in either Python or Vala, if we aren't super careful).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903574

Title:
  isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

Status in GObject Introspection:
  Unknown
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in isenkram package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in appstream package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  An attempt to run the isenkram-lookup command from the isenkram-cli
  package results in a segfault/crash. The proposed appstream upload in
   fixes the
  issue.

  [Test case]

  1. Install the isenkram package

  2. Run the isenkram-lookup command

  -> Find that it segfaults

  3. Install the packages built by the appstream source
     package from groovy-proposed

  -> Find that the command succeeds and possibly lists a few
     suggested packages.

  [Where problems could occur]

  TBH this fix is far above my head. Only code comments are changed,
  i.e. some occurrences of "full" are replaced with "container", but it
  still has proved to be it.

  The reasoning in the commit message sounds plausible:

  https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/b52858bf

  [Original description]

  I just run the isenkram-lookup command.

  The crash may be related to this autopkgtest failure (which current
  blocks migration of gtk+3.0):

  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac
  /autopkgtest-
  hirsute/hirsute/amd64/i/isenkram/20201108_141822_ee8c4@/log.gz

  This is the script which fails:

  https://salsa.debian.org/debian/isenkram/-/blob/master/debian/tests
  /test-command-line

  and it includes the isenkram-lookup command.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: isenkram-cli 0.44
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-25.26-generic 5.8.14
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu51
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Nov  9 18:07:47 2020
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/isenkram-lookup
  ExecutableTimestamp: 1595665183
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-10 (365 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.8
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/isenkram-lookup
  ProcCwd: /home/gunnar
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.6, python3-minimal, 
3.8.6-0ubuntu1
  PythonDetails: N/A
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0x7f27ae221cca :
mov(%rdi),%rax
   PC (0x7f27ae221cca) ok
   source "(%rdi)" (0x64657375) not located in a known VMA region 
(needed readable region)!
   destination "%rax" ok
  SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: isenkram
  StacktraceTop:
   g_type_check_instance_cast () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
   as_component_get_provided_for_kind () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.8
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.8
   () at /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gi/_gi.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
  Title: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lp lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gobject-introspection/+bug/1903574/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1903574] Re: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2020-11-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The bug is actually this one, in gobject-introspection:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305


** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues #305
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903574

Title:
  isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in isenkram package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in appstream source package in Groovy:
  Confirmed
Status in appstream package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  An attempt to run the isenkram-lookup command from the isenkram-cli
  package results in a segfault/crash. The proposed appstream upload in
   fixes the
  issue.

  [Test case]

  1. Install the isenkram package

  2. Run the isenkram-lookup command

  -> Find that it segfaults

  3. Install the packages built by the appstream source
     package from groovy-proposed

  -> Find that the command succeeds and possibly lists a few
     suggested packages.

  [Where problems could occur]

  TBH this fix is far above my head. Only code comments are changed,
  i.e. some occurrences of "full" are replaced with "container", but it
  still has proved to be it.

  The reasoning in the commit message sounds plausible:

  https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/b52858bf

  [Original description]

  I just run the isenkram-lookup command.

  The crash may be related to this autopkgtest failure (which current
  blocks migration of gtk+3.0):

  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac
  /autopkgtest-
  hirsute/hirsute/amd64/i/isenkram/20201108_141822_ee8c4@/log.gz

  This is the script which fails:

  https://salsa.debian.org/debian/isenkram/-/blob/master/debian/tests
  /test-command-line

  and it includes the isenkram-lookup command.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: isenkram-cli 0.44
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-25.26-generic 5.8.14
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu51
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Nov  9 18:07:47 2020
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/isenkram-lookup
  ExecutableTimestamp: 1595665183
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-10 (365 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.8
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/isenkram-lookup
  ProcCwd: /home/gunnar
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.6, python3-minimal, 
3.8.6-0ubuntu1
  PythonDetails: N/A
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0x7f27ae221cca :
mov(%rdi),%rax
   PC (0x7f27ae221cca) ok
   source "(%rdi)" (0x64657375) not located in a known VMA region 
(needed readable region)!
   destination "%rax" ok
  SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: isenkram
  StacktraceTop:
   g_type_check_instance_cast () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
   as_component_get_provided_for_kind () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.8
   () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.8
   () at /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gi/_gi.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
  Title: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lp lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1903574/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1881894] Re: Apps from PPAs with AppStream metadata are not displayed

2020-06-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is kind of to be expected, PPAs - unlike the main Ubuntu
repositories - do not support AppStream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881894

Title:
  Apps from PPAs with AppStream metadata are not displayed

Status in snap-store:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This happens on the latest Snap Store on fully updated Ubuntu 20.04.
  When adding a PPA that has packages with AppStream metadata, it should
  be possible to find and install these packages from Snap Store.
  However, when searching for them in Snap Store, no results are found.

  To reproduce this issue, try, for example, add Lutris PPA:
  $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:lutris-team/lutris
  $ sudo apt-get update

  Then restart the computer or run "killall snap-store", then launch
  Ubuntu Software again and search for "Lutris".

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/+bug/1881894/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Nice :-) Now only the gnome-software patch is missing to fix this issue
completely (at least for the package, according to Launchpad)

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software source package in Focal:
  Triaged
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

  
  [Impact] 

   * Some apt packages do not include an icon in snap-store

  [Test Case]

   * Open snap-store, search for GCompris and confirm there is an
  appropriate icon

  [Regression Potential]

   * Very low.  Previous Ubuntu releases including apt-config-icons
  based on the depends in gnome-software.  This just adds an apt config
  that can be used to fetch icons for apt packages via apt.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  Fix Committed
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Focal:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

  
  [Impact] 

   * Some apt packages do not include an icon in snap-store

  [Test Case]

   * Open snap-store, search for GCompris and confirm there is an
  appropriate icon

  [Regression Potential]

   * Very low.  Previous Ubuntu releases including apt-config-icons
  based on the depends in gnome-software.  This just adds an apt config
  that can be used to fetch icons for apt packages via apt.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Neat :-) That should do the job for all combinations of snap-store and 
gnome-software, once the GS patch is in there as well.
Thanks Ken for doing the integration work :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  Fix Committed
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software source package in Focal:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Focal:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

  
  [Impact] 

   * Some apt packages do not include an icon in snap-store

  [Test Case]

   * Open snap-store, search for GCompris and confirm there is an
  appropriate icon

  [Regression Potential]

   * Very low.  Previous Ubuntu releases including apt-config-icons
  based on the depends in gnome-software.  This just adds an apt config
  that can be used to fetch icons for apt packages via apt.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On a fresh Ubuntu installation, apt-config-icons isn't installed by
default (at least it wasn't when I installed a fresh Ubuntu yesterday,
until I replaced the snap-store with the packaged gnome-software). So
new users who aren't upgrading from a previous Ubuntu version will still
have much less icons than people who get Focal by upgrading from an
older Ubuntu release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  Fix Committed
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@nicocarbone: You'll also want to do something that `apt-config-icons`
is installed alongside `appstream` in Ubuntu desktops that use the
gnome-software Snap.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  Fix Committed
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On 1): The metainfo/appdata file is only enough if it is complete, so,
contains an icon reference and name/summary/etc. tags. If it doesn't,
then you'll need the .desktop file as well and a launchable entry.

On 2): All of these locations are wrong ^^ Metainfo files *must* be installed 
into /usr/share/metainfo in order to be valid. Refer to the AppStream 
specification (specifically 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#spec-component-location)
 for details.
There's also an online tool to help people making metainfo files at 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/metainfocreator/#/ now

As for that existing "appdata" file, make sure it's actually an
AppStream metainfo file before installing it somewhere else - maybe it
just coincidentally has the same name as a metainfo file, but actually
is something different.

Also, google.chrome and network-manager need their metainfo locations
fixed ;-) It's likely that support for the legacy location will go away
soonish (almost nothing installs files there nowadays).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825766

Title:
  search results don't match apt search

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  searching for "guake" does not show the "guake" package, but if I
  search it via apt, I do see it available.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Apr 21 17:39:19 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-21 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1825766/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
>From looking at this again, I'm pretty sure that my patch from #1864307
will actually fix this issue too :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

Status in GNOME Software:
  New
Status in snap-store:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  When an icon theme different from Adwaita is selected, the icons from
  that theme are not shown in Gnome-Software.

  This is confusing for user because they now see two different icons
  for the same application (see the screenshot upstream).

  It would be great if Gnome-Software would look for the icon in the
  selected icon theme.

  
  

  Reported upstream here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
  software/issues/929

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Actually, I just realized that Ubuntu has its very own, new flavor of this bug 
due to shipping gnome-software as a Snap. The `appstream` package is seeded 
with the minimal desktop seed, which is good, but in order for the Snap version 
of GS to install any icons, the `apt-config-icons` package also has to be 
installed - GS isn't smart enough to fall back to downloading icons in many 
cases and expects those to be present. The `gnome-software` package depends on 
the icon config, but the Snap store doesn't have this on new installations.
So, to fix this issue both the patch I linked in this report and a default 
dependency on `apt-config-icons` is needed.

The reason the `appstream` package doesn't depend on the icons on its
own is that the data may also be used on servers and more minimal
systems (e.g. for firmware and driver information) where downloading the
icons isn't required. Therefore, all software centers in Debian/Ubuntu
depend on the `apt-config-icons*` package(s) they need.

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2020-05-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@stuardo:
The reason for Guake being missing is that the `guake.desktop` file in 
`/usr/share/applications` is a symbolic link *and* the application doesn't ship 
a metainfo file.
This is forbidden: https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines
The .desktop file being a symlink results in Guake basically not being seen by 
the metadata generator at all. To fix this, either the .desktop file needs to 
be an actual file, and not a symlink, or a metainfo file[1] has to be shipped 
with this package. Ideally both.

The reason this package is missing is simply a result of nobody caring
enough to submit a patch or do a bit of work to make this app show up
for a few years now (it never was in the catalog, as far as I can tell).
Maybe a good case for a patch submission? ;-)

[1]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/metainfocreator/#/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825766

Title:
  search results don't match apt search

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  searching for "guake" does not show the "guake" package, but if I
  search it via apt, I do see it available.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Apr 21 17:39:19 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-21 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1825766/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1873493] Re: icons missing from main and internal pages

2020-04-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307
   Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873493

Title:
  icons missing from main and internal pages

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The recent releases category on the homepage of software on Xubuntu
  20.04 has no icons.

  https://bluesabre.org/content/images/2020/04/desktop-06-software.png

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.35.91-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Fri Apr 17 20:36:46 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200416)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.35.91-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1873493/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1875307] Re: Missing application icons Gnome-Software Xubuntu 20.04

2020-04-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1873493
   icons missing from main and internal pages
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307
   Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875307

Title:
  Missing application icons Gnome-Software Xubuntu 20.04

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The majority of application icons in gnome software are missing. Even
  if I re-install snapd gnome-software-plugin-snap, see attached
  screenshot.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.36.0-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Mon Apr 27 10:15:30 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snapN/A
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1875307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872258
   GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but 
some metadata was ignored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631

Title:
  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  `apt-get update` and the nightly `apticron --cron` job are reporting:

  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

  This is pretty much meaningless to most people who have no idea what
  AppStream is and what "verbose log" is being referred to. I dug around
  and managed to discover `appstreamcli refresh-cache --force
  --verbose`, whose output is attached.

  I don't know what the "bad" output is or how to fix it. All I know is
  that I hope Focal isn't going to be generating this message when it
  ships, because it isn't going to make sense to most people and most
  people won't know how to fix it and it causes annoying emails from
  apticron every night.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: appstream 0.12.10-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-12.15-generic 5.4.8
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-12-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu16
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Feb  2 16:01:24 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-08-16 (170 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-01-31 (2 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Ooooh, sorry... I was coming from duplicate #1864307, which the patch above 
solves, but I am not sure if this particular issue is solved as well...
So, I don't think #1864307 is a duplicate bug of this, I think those two are 
separate issues (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918 and 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues/929 respectively)
Sorry for the noise, I'll unlink those issue reports.

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues #918
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918

** Patch removed: 
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+attachment/5358966/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

Status in GNOME Software:
  New
Status in snap-store:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  When an icon theme different from Adwaita is selected, the icons from
  that theme are not shown in Gnome-Software.

  This is confusing for user because they now see two different icons
  for the same application (see the screenshot upstream).

  It would be great if Gnome-Software would look for the icon in the
  selected icon theme.

  
  

  Reported upstream here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
  software/issues/929

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1866134
   Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues #918
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918

** Also affects: gnome-software via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Patch added: 
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+attachment/5358973/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in GNOME Software:
  Unknown
Status in snap-store:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Or rather, use the even better (attached) patch :-P

** Patch added: 
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+attachment/5358966/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

Status in GNOME Software:
  New
Status in snap-store:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  When an icon theme different from Adwaita is selected, the icons from
  that theme are not shown in Gnome-Software.

  This is confusing for user because they now see two different icons
  for the same application (see the screenshot upstream).

  It would be great if Gnome-Software would look for the icon in the
  selected icon theme.

  
  

  Reported upstream here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
  software/issues/929

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You will want this patch, unless there are further modifications to it
in the next few days: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
software/-/commit/d743f920867d8f57beac56191c8912147ef23c8f

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

Status in GNOME Software:
  New
Status in snap-store:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  When an icon theme different from Adwaita is selected, the icons from
  that theme are not shown in Gnome-Software.

  This is confusing for user because they now see two different icons
  for the same application (see the screenshot upstream).

  It would be great if Gnome-Software would look for the icon in the
  selected icon theme.

  
  

  Reported upstream here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
  software/issues/929

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1872258] [NEW] GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored"

2020-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Hi!
GNOME Software currently injects invalid AppStream metadata in Focal, causing a 
complaint message like "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was 
ignored due to errors." on every APT update.
This can be fixed by applying this patch from upstream and Debian, which was 
present in GNOME's release candidate but was accidentally reverted: 
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/blob/05553c1bfa2124a12e3afe5c63de510310377036/debian/patches/02_fix-appstream-featured-data.patch

Debian already ships this patch.
Thanks for considering!

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Triaged


** Tags: patch

** Tags added: patch

** Summary changed:

- Injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but some 
metadata was ignored due to errors."
+ GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but 
some metadata was ignored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258

Title:
  GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update
  completed, but some metadata was ignored"

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Hi!
  GNOME Software currently injects invalid AppStream metadata in Focal, causing 
a complaint message like "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata 
was ignored due to errors." on every APT update.
  This can be fixed by applying this patch from upstream and Debian, which was 
present in GNOME's release candidate but was accidentally reverted: 
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/blob/05553c1bfa2124a12e3afe5c63de510310377036/debian/patches/02_fix-appstream-featured-data.patch

  Debian already ships this patch.
  Thanks for considering!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1872258/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1867471] Re: FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+attachment/5337013/+files/appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867471

Title:
  FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Please sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

  Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
  This revision pulls in a few changes from upstream to fix issues or
  prevent future annoyances:

  fix-free-license-check.patch
  A plain bugfix to the "is this a free license?" check of AppStream, which was
  introduced in this release. In the current version, licenses which are 
non-free
  may incorrectly be considered free. There isn't much stuff using this feature
  yet, but when it does we may as well give a correct result.

  ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch
  A simple non-functional manual page addition, since people apparently had
  a hard time to find the "--explain" switch for the AppStream validator.
  There is no potential for regression in this patch.

  ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch
  Control relations are defined in the upcoming version of the AppStream
  specification and define how an application is controlled (keyboard, touch, 
...).
  This feature is potentially used *a lot* and the current validator in Ubuntu
  will consider the usage of this tag invalid.
  With this patch, this tag isn't considered an error anymore, which should
  annoy users and developers much less when they are working with
  AppStream data on the LTS release.

  update-static-data.patch
  This just updates the license ID list to what is current in the SPDX
  registry.

  The regression potential of all of these changes is very low. Having them
  will greatly improve the experience of users with AppStream metadata in
  Ubuntu, and hopefully may lead to less bug reports upstream ;-)

  A full debdiff of the changes is attached. The biggest change is the
  non-free-licenses fix, all the other changes are simple few-line changes
  or just update static data or help text.

  Thanks for considering!

  Changelog entries since current focal version 0.12.10-1:

  appstream (0.12.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium

* Add fix-free-license-check.patch: Non-free licenses were previously
  considered free software, this patch fixes that
* Add ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch: Explain the `--explain` flag for
  `appstreamcli validate` in the manual page as well
* Add ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch: Don't fail validation
  if control relations exists. This is an upcoming AppStream feature that
  will potentially be used quite a lot.
* Add update-static-data.patch: Update the license and TLD lists to
  validate newer licenses correctly.
* Bump standards version: No changes needed

   -- Matthias Klumpp   Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:40:14 +0100

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1867471] [NEW] FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Please sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
This revision pulls in a few changes from upstream to fix issues or
prevent future annoyances:

fix-free-license-check.patch
A plain bugfix to the "is this a free license?" check of AppStream, which was
introduced in this release. In the current version, licenses which are non-free
may incorrectly be considered free. There isn't much stuff using this feature
yet, but when it does we may as well give a correct result.

ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch
A simple non-functional manual page addition, since people apparently had
a hard time to find the "--explain" switch for the AppStream validator.
There is no potential for regression in this patch.

ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch
Control relations are defined in the upcoming version of the AppStream
specification and define how an application is controlled (keyboard, touch, 
...).
This feature is potentially used *a lot* and the current validator in Ubuntu
will consider the usage of this tag invalid.
With this patch, this tag isn't considered an error anymore, which should
annoy users and developers much less when they are working with
AppStream data on the LTS release.

update-static-data.patch
This just updates the license ID list to what is current in the SPDX
registry.

The regression potential of all of these changes is very low. Having them
will greatly improve the experience of users with AppStream metadata in
Ubuntu, and hopefully may lead to less bug reports upstream ;-)

A full debdiff of the changes is attached. The biggest change is the
non-free-licenses fix, all the other changes are simple few-line changes
or just update static data or help text.

Thanks for considering!

Changelog entries since current focal version 0.12.10-1:

appstream (0.12.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add fix-free-license-check.patch: Non-free licenses were previously
considered free software, this patch fixes that
  * Add ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch: Explain the `--explain` flag for
`appstreamcli validate` in the manual page as well
  * Add ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch: Don't fail validation
if control relations exists. This is an upcoming AppStream feature that
will potentially be used quite a lot.
  * Add update-static-data.patch: Update the license and TLD lists to
validate newer licenses correctly.
  * Bump standards version: No changes needed

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:40:14 +0100

** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867471

Title:
  FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Please sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

  Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
  This revision pulls in a few changes from upstream to fix issues or
  prevent future annoyances:

  fix-free-license-check.patch
  A plain bugfix to the "is this a free license?" check of AppStream, which was
  introduced in this release. In the current version, licenses which are 
non-free
  may incorrectly be considered free. There isn't much stuff using this feature
  yet, but when it does we may as well give a correct result.

  ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch
  A simple non-functional manual page addition, since people apparently had
  a hard time to find the "--explain" switch for the AppStream validator.
  There is no potential for regression in this patch.

  ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch
  Control relations are defined in the upcoming version of the AppStream
  specification and define how an application is controlled (keyboard, touch, 
...).
  This feature is potentially used *a lot* and the current validator in Ubuntu
  will consider the usage of this tag invalid.
  With this patch, this tag isn't considered an error anymore, which should
  annoy users and developers much less when they are working with
  AppStream data on the LTS release.

  update-static-data.patch
  This just updates the license ID list to what is current in the SPDX
  registry.

  The regression potential of all of these changes is very low. Having them
  will greatly improve the experience of users with AppStream metadata in
  Ubuntu, and hopefully may lead to less bug reports upstream ;-)

  A full debdiff of the changes is attached. The biggest change is the
  non-free-licenses fix, all the other changes are simple few-line changes
  or just update static data or help text.

  Thanks for considering!

  Changelog entries since current focal version 0.12.10-1:

  appstream (0.12.10-2) unstable;

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1867469] Re: Update failed on allmost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@lammert-nijhof: Your locale/keyboard layout is likely messed up - type
your password without sudo, to see which password you are actually
typing for your account (and then adjust to the keyboard layout you
currently have for repair)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867469

Title:
  Update failed on allmost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Today the update of almost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems failed. Afterwards
  the system can't be rebooted and even the recovery mode does not work.

  This is one of the symptons and I even did not touch the keyboard.

  bertadmin@VM-Budgie:~$ sudo -s
  Sorry, try again.
  Sorry, try again.
  sudo: 3 incorrect password attempts
  bertadmin@VM-Budgie:~$

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.35.91-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-14.17-generic 5.4.18
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-14-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu20
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Sat Mar 14 17:16:04 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-01-13 (61 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 
(20200113)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.35.91-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1867469/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-02-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
There are two things which could be the cause for this:
 1) The appstream-generator used for Focal is old, and there were quite a few 
fixes to find more icons and ignore apps without sufficient icon data in more 
recent releases. @laney will hopefully update the tool ;-)

 2) GNOME Software has a bug which makes it always load stock icons for
applications, even if they are actually not available on the system and
GS should fall back to the cached icons. We've seen this in Debian but I
haven't had the time yet to investigate this further.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Many applications have no icon displayed in GNOME Software 3.35.91 on
  latest Ubuntu Focal. See the attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-02-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Technically, PPAs with AppStream data or other repositories with broken data 
can trigger this as well.
AppStream could make a guess who is to blame for the breakage and give a more 
specific error, but that will require some more extensive code changes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631

Title:
  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  `apt-get update` and the nightly `apticron --cron` job are reporting:

  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

  This is pretty much meaningless to most people who have no idea what
  AppStream is and what "verbose log" is being referred to. I dug around
  and managed to discover `appstreamcli refresh-cache --force
  --verbose`, whose output is attached.

  I don't know what the "bad" output is or how to fix it. All I know is
  that I hope Focal isn't going to be generating this message when it
  ships, because it isn't going to make sense to most people and most
  people won't know how to fix it and it causes annoying emails from
  apticron every night.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: appstream 0.12.10-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-12.15-generic 5.4.8
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-12-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu16
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Feb  2 16:01:24 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-08-16 (170 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-01-31 (2 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-02-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This error message is shown not to alert users, but rather make users report 
these issues to the distributor, as this particular issue means the distributor 
has a mistake in their metadata somewhere.
In this case it's not Ubuntu's fault directly, but rather GNOME Software 
injecting invalid metadata.
This is fixed upstream with commit 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/commit/7c1620990b6361fac370b76c9828f8f77ff77a72
 which should land in the next Ubuntu release naturally (but may be 
cherry-picked to make this issue go away even sooner).

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631

Title:
  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  `apt-get update` and the nightly `apticron --cron` job are reporting:

  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

  This is pretty much meaningless to most people who have no idea what
  AppStream is and what "verbose log" is being referred to. I dug around
  and managed to discover `appstreamcli refresh-cache --force
  --verbose`, whose output is attached.

  I don't know what the "bad" output is or how to fix it. All I know is
  that I hope Focal isn't going to be generating this message when it
  ships, because it isn't going to make sense to most people and most
  people won't know how to fix it and it causes annoying emails from
  apticron every night.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: appstream 0.12.10-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-12.15-generic 5.4.8
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-12-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu16
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Feb  2 16:01:24 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-08-16 (170 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-01-31 (2 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1794213] Re: Crash on Upgrade preparation from 18.04 to 18.10 in APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success

2020-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is resolved in `appstream >= 0.12.7` (since the code doesn't exist
there anymore). The original issue was likely caused by AppStream not
handling broken metadata correctly, which is an area that has also been
improved greatly.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794213

Title:
  Crash on Upgrade preparation from 18.04 to 18.10 in APT::Update::Post-
  Invoke-Success

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  E:Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'if 
/usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e /usr/bin/appstreamcli; then 
appstreamcli refresh-cache > /dev/null; fi', E:Sub-process returned an error 
code
  The above error is in the small box.  The information below is in the 
terminal window that I thought might give clues on what happened on disto 
upgrade to 18.10 from command line.

   
  QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-root'
  kdeinit5: Got EXEC_NEW 
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/http.so' from launcher.
  kdeinit5: preparing to launch 
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/kf5/kio/http.so'
  QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-root'
  kdeinit5: Got EXT_EXEC '/usr/bin/firefox' from launcher.
  kdeinit5: preparing to launch '/usr/bin/firefox'
  kdeinit5: PID 5799 terminated.

  (appstreamcli:6926): GLib-CRITICAL **: 21:59:50.626:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:6926): GLib-CRITICAL **: 21:59:50.626:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:6926): GLib-ERROR **: 21:59:50.626: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
  QXcbConnection: XCB error: 3 (BadWindow), sequence: 792, resource id: 
39845978, major code: 40 (TranslateCoords), minor code: 0

  (appstreamcli:8091): GLib-CRITICAL **: 22:00:11.961:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:8091): GLib-CRITICAL **: 22:00:11.961:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:8091): GLib-ERROR **: 22:00:11.961: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)

  (appstreamcli:8899): GLib-CRITICAL **: 22:00:17.376:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:8899): GLib-CRITICAL **: 22:00:17.376:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:8899): GLib-ERROR **: 22:00:17.376: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)

  (appstreamcli:9701): GLib-CRITICAL **: 22:00:21.530:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:9701): GLib-CRITICAL **: 22:00:21.530:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:9701): GLib-ERROR **: 22:00:21.530: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
  kdeinit5: PID 6868 terminated.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1794213/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1848387] Re: dpkg error when triggers are activated

2020-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is resolved in appstream >= 0.12.10-1

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848387

Title:
  dpkg error when triggers are activated

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The following message, or something like it, is output when an update
  to appstream is done on 19.10:

  dpkg: error: version '/usr/share/app-info/yaml /usr/share/app-info/icons' has 
ba
  d syntax: version string has embedded spaces

  This appears to be caused by this line in the appstream.postinst:

  if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" ge-nl "0.12.8"; then

  This gets called when the registered triggers are activated:

  interest-noawait /usr/share/app-info/icons
  interest-noawait /usr/share/app-info/yaml
  interest-noawait /usr/share/app-info/xml

  I recommend checking in the postinst if we are handling a trigger and
  avoiding the dpkg version comparison

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1848387/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1718453] Re: apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch 
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen, at least not anytime soon. 
It's simply easier for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64 
instead of relying on i386 compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would download lots of additional big 
metadata and run into all kinds of troubles of which app gets selected when 
there are ID conflicts.
Resolving all of these issues is possible, but the huge effort IMHO doesn't 
justify the gains. If someone else works on this, I'd assist the work, but I 
will unlikely work on this myself. I originally intended to, but TBH, this 
issue has really low priority nowadays.

There is a workaround for high-profile packages that are only available
on one architecture: *If* i386 support is enabled by default, the
appstream-generator can be instructed to inject metadata for a specific
package directly into the final metadata collection. See
https://github.com/ximion/appstream-generator/blob/master/docs/asgen-
config.md#injecting-extra-metainfo--removing-components for details.
This is intended to be used for adding web applications, but may work
for the multiarch case as well, at least for a select few of high-
profile application packages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718453

Title:
  apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and
  appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I noticed the following community member had a problem installing
  steam. I reproduced it on 16.04.3 clean install i386 and amd64.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24NH3Ry22Dg

  Install 16.04 amd64 or i386
  Install all updates via software updater
  Open Ubuntu Software
  Search for steam.

  No results for Steam found.
  Yet steam is in the repository as an i386 deb - but it doesn't show up in 
Ubuntu Software on either amd64 or i386 installs.

  
  Also discussed at 
https://ubuntu.labix.org/t/ubuntu-software-deb-install-issues/81

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-35.39~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-35-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Wed Sep 20 15:46:02 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-20 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20170801)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1718453/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1564570] Re: Gnome Software catalog entry missing for Steam except on i386

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch 
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app 
authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 
compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would download lots of additional big 
metadata and run into all kinds of troubles of which app gets selected when 
there are conflicts.
Resolving all of these issues is possible, but the huge effort IMHO doesn't 
justify the gains.

There is a workaround for high-profile packages that are only available
on one architecture: *If* i386 support is enabled by default, the
appstream-generator tool can be instructed to inject metadata for a
specific package directly into the final metadata collection. See
https://github.com/ximion/appstream-generator/blob/master/docs/asgen-
config.md#injecting-extra-metainfo--removing-components for details.
This is intended to be used for web applications, but may work for this
case as well. Steam may be important enough for that exception. The
final decision is up to Ubuntu and the metadata generator admins though.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564570

Title:
  Gnome Software catalog entry missing for Steam except on i386

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Confirmed
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion
Status in appstream-dep11 package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in steam package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in steam source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  A very beautiful app, but is missing in the Gnome-Software catalog!!!
  You can install it from terminal and then it appears in Gnome-software but if 
you search for it in gnome-software first you can´t install it.

  It shows up in Ubuntu 'i386' but not Ubuntu 'amd64'.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1564570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The specific code that resulted in this issue doesn't exist in newer
AppStream releases, so this sort of is "fixed" that way, as this issue
can't be triggered anymore.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Crashed, reset my screen but kept all documents open I had

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: appstream 0.11.3-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-12.13-generic 4.13.3
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-12-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sat Sep 30 16:27:55 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/appstreamcli
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-07-25 (67 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release i386 (20170412)
  ProcCmdline: appstreamcli refresh-cache
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0xb7e0e0ba : 
pushl  (%eax)
   PC (0xb7e0e0ba) ok
   source "(%eax)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "(%esp)" (0xbfaca794) ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: appstream
  StacktraceTop:
   g_variant_serialiser_needed_size () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_variant_serialiser_needed_size () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  Title: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_serialiser_needed_size()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1720552/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1567630] Re: Skype not shown as installation candidate

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch 
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app 
authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 
compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would download lots of additional big 
metadata and run into all kinds of troubles of which app gets selected when 
there are conflicts.
Resolving all of these issues is possible, but the huge effort IMHO doesn't 
justify the gains.

There is a workaround for high-profile packages that are only available
on one architecture: *If* i386 support is enabled by default, the
appstream-generator can be instructed to inject metadata for a specific
package directly into the final metadata collection. See
https://github.com/ximion/appstream-generator/blob/master/docs/asgen-
config.md#injecting-extra-metainfo--removing-components for details.
This is intended to be used for web applications, but may work for this
case as well.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567630

Title:
  Skype not shown as installation candidate

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in skype package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I activated Canonical Partners, but Skype did not show up when I used
  gnome-software to search for it.

  I have a theory (unconfirmed):

  I used a 64 bits Xenial, with only amd64 architecture enabled. While
  the .deb package skype is amd64, it's a meta package. The skype-bin
  package, with the important files including the .desktop file, is
  i386.

  So possibly skype would have showed up in gnome-software if I had
  first enabled i386 with

  dpkg --add-architecture i386

  OTOH, even if that's the case, I don't think it ought to be necessary.
  When using Synaptic, skype was shown.

  A possible fix (workaround?) would be to move the .desktop file from
  skype-bin to skype.

  Anyway, I could successfully install Skype from command line, and then
  it showed up in gnome-software. However, bug #1563322 applies to Skype
  too.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1567630/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1841130] Re: idle, idle-python is missing from Apps Store

2019-08-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
IDLE has no icon, and apparently never had one:
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/bionic/universe/issues/idle-python3.6.html

The very best way to fix this permanently in the future would be to ask
Python upstream to add a metainfo file for IDLE as described in
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Quickstart.html
#sect-Quickstart-DesktopApps

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841130

Title:
  idle, idle-python is missing from Apps Store

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The following packages cannot be found in the Apps Store in Ubuntu
  18.04 and 19.04:

  idle/bionic-updates,bionic-updates 3.6.7-1~18.04 all
  idle-python2.7/bionic-updates,bionic-updates,bionic-security,bionic-security 
2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04 all
  idle-python3.6/bionic-updates,bionic-updates,bionic-security,bionic-security 
3.6.8-1~18.04.1 all
  idle-python3.7/bionic-updates,bionic-updates,bionic-security,bionic-security 
3.7.3-2~18.04.1 all
  idle3/bionic-updates,bionic-updates 3.6.7-1~18.04 all

  They used to be available. These are default tools for python
  scripting and should be made available.

  
  $ uname -a
  Linux Machine 5.0.0-25-generic #26~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 1 13:51:02 UTC 
2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  $ dpkg -l | grep linux-generic-hwe-
  ii  linux-generic-hwe-18.04 5.0.0.25.82amd64   Complete Generic Linux 
kernel and headers

  $ lsb_release -a
  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
  Release:18.04
  Codename:   bionic

  $ dpkg -l | grep ubuntu-software
  ii  ubuntu-software3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.10   all   Utility for browsing, 
installing, and removing software

  $ dpkg -l | grep gnome-software
  ii  gnome-software  3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.10   amd64  Software 
Center for GNOME
  ii  gnome-software-common   3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.10all   Software 
Center for GNOME (common files)
  ii  gnome-software-plugin-snap  3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.10   amd64  Snap 
support for GNOME Software

  $ grep -r --include '*.list' '^deb ' /etc/apt/sources.list 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic main 
restricted
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates 
main restricted
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic universe
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates 
universe
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic multiverse
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates 
multiverse
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports 
main restricted universe multiverse
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic partner
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security 
main restricted
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security 
universe
  /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security 
multiverse

  
  https://askubuntu.com/questions/1167734/where-is-idle-python3-6   Asked today 
  
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1057574/software-centre-how-does-it-choose-what-to-show
 Asked 1 year, 1 month ago
  https://askubuntu.com/questions/1029872/where-is-idle-18-04  Asked 1 year, 3 
months ago

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1841130/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2019-04-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You can expect to find an app in GNOME Software if it is a GUI
application (== has a .desktop file in /usr/share/applications/ that
isn't NoDisplay and of Type=Application). For anything else (that likely
includes phpMyAdmin) GNOME Software isn't the right tool and wasn't
designed for.

Apps will also definitely show up if they have AppStream metainfo files of type 
desktop-application (so service-types are also excluded here, currently).
Also it appears that on Ubuntu Snaps aren't filtered by type.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825766

Title:
  search results don't match apt search

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  searching for "guake" does not show the "guake" package, but if I
  search it via apt, I do see it available.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Apr 21 17:39:19 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-21 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.30.6-2ubuntu3
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1825766/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2019-04-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It's worth mentioning that while PackageKit will likely not receive much
feature development unless someone steps up to do that, it is in solid
maintenance mode and likely will remain like that for quite some time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673258

Title:
  Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

Status in aptdaemon package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apturl package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in dell-recovery package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in language-selector package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in lubuntu-software-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mythbuntu-control-centre package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sessioninstaller package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-mate-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-mate-welcome package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion
Status in update-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in update-notifier package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in zeroinstall-injector package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  aptdaemon is abandoned and unmaintained.  It has already been dropped
  from Debian, but there are several reverse dependencies keeping it in
  Ubuntu.  I will add bug tasks for each of those dependencies, which
  should be ported or dropped themselves.  Then we can get rid of
  aptdaemon too.

  See this mailing list thread for more details:
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2017-March/039722.html

  https://github.com/ubuntu-mate/ubuntu-mate-welcome/issues/48

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1673258/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1799851] Re: Software Boutique window suddenly shows Welcome window and looses all the apps I queued to install

2018-10-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
GNOME Software might be the wrong package, the MATE Software Boutique is
a different app. A quick search suggests that it might be part of the
MATE welcome center, but a look into the package couldn't confirm that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799851

Title:
  Software Boutique window suddenly shows Welcome window and looses all
  the apps I queued to install

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-mate-welcome package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I was selecting apps to install in the Software Boutique, then
  suddenly the Boutique Window displayed the welcome window and lost all
  the apps I queued for installation.

  Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (just reinstalled when Ubuntu MATE 18.10 went into total 
meltdown).
  AMD 64-bit prosessor

  Menu->Administration->Software Boutique

  I had actually hoped to install the same software I had installed when
  I first installed 18.04.

  All work lost.

  The code quality is definitely going down hill fast. (even ubuntu-bug -w gets 
an error message
  robert@A88XM-A:~/Desktop$ ubuntu-bug -w
  Gtk-Message: 20:41:01.726: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This 
is discouraged.).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: python3.6-minimal 3.6.6-1~18.04
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-38.41-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Oct 24 20:41:06 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/python3.6
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-25 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180426)
  ProcEnviron:
   
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.6, python3-minimal, 
3.6.5-3ubuntu1
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
  SourcePackage: python3.6
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1799851/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1798822] Re: GLib-ERROR on refresh-cache

2018-10-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1792537 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792537

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1792537
   
/usr/bin/appstreamcli:5:g_variant_new_parsed_va:g_variant_builder_add_parsed:as_content_rating_to_variant:as_component_to_variant:as_cache_file_save

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798822

Title:
  GLib-ERROR  on refresh-cache

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  when ever I try to run `appstreamcli refresh-cache` I get this error:

  (appstreamcli:3192): GLib-CRITICAL **: 16:45:24.012:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:3192): GLib-CRITICAL **: 16:45:24.012:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:3192): GLib-ERROR **: 16:45:24.013: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: appstream 0.12.2-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-34.37-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-34-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Oct 19 16:40:46 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-02-15 (246 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Alpha amd64 (20180214)
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1798822/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1790693] Re: appstreamcli crash when attempting release upgrade to cosmic

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

While the actual bug is fixed in cosmic already, it might make sense to
backport it to ensure upgrades run smoothly.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790693

Title:
  appstreamcli crash when attempting release upgrade to cosmic

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  (appstreamcli:7417): GLib-^[[1;35mCRITICAL^[[0m **: ^[[34m10:34:15.801^[[0m: 
g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types || 
GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite 
(GVSB(builder)->type)' failed^M
  ^M
  (appstreamcli:7417): GLib-^[[1;35mCRITICAL^[[0m **: ^[[34m10:34:15.802^[[0m: 
g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed^M
  ^M
  (appstreamcli:7417): GLib-^[[1;31mERROR^[[0m **: ^[[34m10:34:15.802^[[0m: 
g_variant_new_parsed: 11-13:invalid GVariant format string^M
  Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)^M

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.22
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 4.15.0-30.32-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-30-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Sep  4 10:39:20 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-08-13 (21 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-09-04 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeAptlog:
   Log time: 2018-09-04 10:29:56.386079
   Log time: 2018-09-04 10:29:59.174856
   Log time: 2018-09-04 10:34:17.437696
  modified.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: 
2018-09-04T09:43:22.733910

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1790693/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

Status in AppStream:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in appstream package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  When running

    sudo apt update

  in a terminal I sometimes see the following message printed within the
  output.

    (appstreamcli:18640): GLib-CRITICAL **: 17:47:38.047:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

  This started happening today (5th August). Otherwise apt update and
  apt upgrade seem to correctly update the system.

  --

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1480

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: libglib2.0-0 2.57.2-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-6.7-generic 4.17.9
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug  5 17:52:41 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-12 (24 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Alpha amd64 (20180711)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: glib2.0
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1789023] Re: Widelands package from Universe is not in the Software Center

2018-08-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The widelands package/metadata needs fixing for it to appear. See
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/cosmic/universe/issues/widelands.html

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Also affects: widelands (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789023

Title:
  Widelands package from Universe is not in the Software Center

Status in widelands:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in widelands package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi, I'm one of the developers of the Widelands game. It has landed in
  Universe:

  https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=widelands

  The packages are also available in Debian stable:

  
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=widelands=names=stretch=all

  However, nobody can see it in the software center. Is there anything
  else I can do myself to get this in and then to maintain it in the
  future?

  The game consists of 2 packages, widelands and widelands-data.

  Thanks!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/widelands/+bug/1789023/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1788923] Re: MyPaint website button goes to wrong website

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => mypaint (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788923

Title:
  MyPaint website button goes to wrong website

Status in mypaint package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When browsing MyPaint in Ubuntu Software if you click on the website
  button it takes you to http://ww1.mypaint.intilinux.com/ where it
  should take you to http://mypaint.org/

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-33.36-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-33-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Aug 24 21:06:36 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-software
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-08-16 (8 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-limba   N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snapN/A
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mypaint/+bug/1788923/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1788894] Re: Hash Sum mismatch: DEP-11 Icons

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not an issue in appstream, but likely the Ubuntu archive.
But it could also be snapcraft doing something weird (that cache path is odd!).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788894

Title:
   Hash Sum mismatch: DEP-11 Icons

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  During update with apt, checking dependencies for a snap:

  Get:1 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease [10.2 kB]  


   
  Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease [242 kB]  


   
  Get:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/mc3man/mpv-tests/ubuntu bionic InRelease [15.4 
kB] 

   
  Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [88.7 kB] 


   
  Get:5 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic/partner amd64 Packages [2344 
B]  

   
  Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports InRelease [74.6 kB]   


   
  Get:7 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic/partner i386 Packages [2340 
B]  


  Get:8 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic/partner Translation-en [1272 
B]  

   
  Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [83.2 kB]


   
  Get:10 http://ppa.launchpad.net/mc3man/mpv-tests/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 
Packages [1068 B]   

   
  Get:11 http://ppa.launchpad.net/mc3man/mpv-tests/ubuntu bionic/main i386 
Packages [1072 B]   


  Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages [1019 kB]  


   
  Get:13 http://ppa.launchpad.net/mc3man/mpv-tests/ubuntu bionic/main 
Translation-en [356 B]  

 
  Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages [1007 kB]   


   
  Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main Translation-en [516 kB]   


   
  Get:16 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 DEP-11 Metadata 
[477 kB]

   
  Get:17 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main DEP-11 48x48 Icons [118 
kB] 

 
  Get:18 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main DEP-11 64x64 Icons [245 
kB] 

 
  Get:19 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1788112] Re: font-manager does not appear in gnome-software

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@jbicha: Those changes will *never* affect a released Debian or Ubuntu version, 
only in-development stuff.
The earliest point I actually would consider making such a change is after the 
Debian Buster release and at least one release before the next Ubuntu LTS. 
Also, the amount of packages with issues should be really low at that point, 
ideally be zero.

And all the things that I might adjust yield at least an AppStream warning-type 
hint for 2-3 years already, and the old-location one is a Lintian warning too.
So people know about it and there's still plenty of time to adapt :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788112

Title:
  font-manager does not appear in gnome-software

Status in font-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in font-manager source package in Xenial:
  New

Bug description:
  The package "Ubuntu Software" does not have "Font Manager" available for 
install while "Synaptic" does.
  This is bad.

  I don't mind having to learn how to deal with either, but PLEASE if
  both are on offer then keep them synchronized.  Alternatively, do away
  with one of them.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.10
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-32.35~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-32-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Tue Aug 21 16:46:11 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-software
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-13 (250 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1788112/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1788112] Re: ubuntu software not synced with synaptic

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It would be neat though if font-manager fixed at least the issues listed
at https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/font-manager.html with
its metadata.

I do actually plan to not have ancient metadata processed anymore at
some point in the future (ancient data is really rare in the archive
nowadays, even).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788112

Title:
  ubuntu software not synced with synaptic

Status in font-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in font-manager source package in Xenial:
  New

Bug description:
  The package "Ubuntu Software" does not have "Font Manager" available for 
install while "Synaptic" does.
  This is bad.

  I don't mind having to learn how to deal with either, but PLEASE if
  both are on offer then keep them synchronized.  Alternatively, do away
  with one of them.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.10
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-32.35~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-32-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Tue Aug 21 16:46:11 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-software
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-13 (250 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1788112/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1788175] Re: AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Reading package lists... Done E: Proble

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is a bug in fwupd/the LVFS data that AFAIK was already fixed there.

** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => fwupd (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788175

Title:
  AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata
  files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Reading package
  lists... Done E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-
  Success 'if /usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e
  /usr/bin/appstreamcli; then appstreamcli refresh-cache > /dev/null;
  fi' E: Sub-process returned an error code

Status in fwupd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata files 
have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml
  Reading package lists... Done
  E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'if 
/usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e /usr/bin/appstreamcli; then 
appstreamcli refresh-cache > /dev/null; fi'
  E: Sub-process returned an error code

  ##
  after doing "sudo appstreamcli refresh --force"

  AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata
  files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml

  message was shown and I havent found a solution to this.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: appstream 0.10.6-1~ubuntu16.04.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-32.35~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-32-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Tue Aug 21 19:03:49 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-07 (74 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1788175/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

Status in AppStream:
  New
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in appstream package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  When running

    sudo apt update

  in a terminal I sometimes see the following message printed within the
  output.

    (appstreamcli:18640): GLib-CRITICAL **: 17:47:38.047:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

  This started happening today (5th August). Otherwise apt update and
  apt upgrade seem to correctly update the system.

  --

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1480

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: libglib2.0-0 2.57.2-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-6.7-generic 4.17.9
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug  5 17:52:41 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-12 (24 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Alpha amd64 (20180711)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: glib2.0
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1787821] Re: appstreamcli refresh crashes with glib error

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787821

Title:
  appstreamcli refresh crashes with glib error

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After aptitude started reporting errors during a run of appstreamcli,
  I checked the mentioned command manually, and indeed it fails with a
  glib error:

  marc@ellen:~$ sudo appstreamcli refresh-cache

  (appstreamcli:16742): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:30:00.982:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:16742): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:30:00.982:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:16742): GLib-ERROR **: 18:30:00.982: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap

  I also tried:

  marc@ellen:~$ sudo appstreamcli refresh

  (appstreamcli:16676): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:29:54.246:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:16676): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:29:54.246:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:16676): GLib-ERROR **: 18:29:54.246: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap

  marc@ellen:~$ sudo appstreamcli refresh --force

  (appstreamcli:17374): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:30:36.810:
  g_variant_builder_end: assertion '!GVSB(builder)->uniform_item_types
  || GVSB(builder)->prev_item_type != NULL || g_variant_type_is_definite
  (GVSB(builder)->type)' failed

  (appstreamcli:17374): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:30:36.811:
  g_variant_new_variant: assertion 'value != NULL' failed

  (appstreamcli:17374): GLib-ERROR **: 18:30:36.811: g_variant_new_parsed: 
11-13:invalid GVariant format string
  Trace/breakpoint trap

  I am not sure whether this recent upgrade is related:
  [UPGRADE] libappstream-glib8:amd64 0.7.7-2 -> 0.7.10-1

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: appstream 0.12.0-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-6.7-generic 4.17.9
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXQt
  Date: Sun Aug 19 18:26:51 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-01-20 (941 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
  SourcePackage: appstream
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1787821/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is fixed in Debian now, in package appstream/0.12.2-2.


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #906538
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538

** Also affects: appstream (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

Status in AppStream:
  New
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in appstream package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  When running

    sudo apt update

  in a terminal I sometimes see the following message printed within the
  output.

    (appstreamcli:18640): GLib-CRITICAL **: 17:47:38.047:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

  This started happening today (5th August). Otherwise apt update and
  apt upgrade seem to correctly update the system.

  --

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1480

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: libglib2.0-0 2.57.2-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-6.7-generic 4.17.9
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug  5 17:52:41 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-12 (24 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Alpha amd64 (20180711)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: glib2.0
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1787774] Re: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787774

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  sudo apt update

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: appstream 0.12.2-1
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-041800-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sun Aug 19 02:36:20 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/appstreamcli
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-09 (70 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  ProcCmdline: appstreamcli refresh-cache
  Signal: 5
  SourcePackage: appstream
  StacktraceTop:
   g_variant_new_parsed_va () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_variant_builder_add_parsed () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
   as_cache_file_save () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
  Title: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1787774/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
See the linked upstream issue for details - this will be fixed soon.

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Bug watch added: github.com/ximion/appstream/issues #198
   https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198

** Also affects: appstream via
   https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

Status in AppStream:
  Unknown
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  When running

    sudo apt update

  in a terminal I sometimes see the following message printed within the
  output.

    (appstreamcli:18640): GLib-CRITICAL **: 17:47:38.047:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

  This started happening today (5th August). Otherwise apt update and
  apt upgrade seem to correctly update the system.

  --

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1480

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: libglib2.0-0 2.57.2-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-6.7-generic 4.17.9
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug  5 17:52:41 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-12 (24 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Alpha amd64 (20180711)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: glib2.0
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1709144] Re: /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or corruption (!prev): ADDR ***

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This issue was actually fixed in AppStream ages ago - definitely
resolved in Bionic+.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709144

Title:
  /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or
  corruption (!prev): ADDR ***

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
appstream.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 0.10.6-2, 
the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/6724539592ad387e87c9af549e40d283f89878bb 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1709144/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1787802] Re: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1787774
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787802

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Crashed when triggerred from initramfs, had to uninstall it to make progress.
  Reinstalled and running it manually shows no crashes but an assertion:
  (appstreamcli:5869): GLib-CRITICAL **: 11:01:51.409: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: 
assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed
  AppStream cache update completed successfully

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: appstream 0.12.0-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-7.8-generic 4.17.12
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Sat Aug 18 21:19:53 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/appstreamcli
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-02 (259 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 
(20171018)
  ProcCmdline: appstreamcli refresh-cache
  Signal: 5
  SourcePackage: appstream
  StacktraceTop:
   g_variant_new_parsed_va () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_variant_builder_add_parsed () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
   as_cache_file_save () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libappstream.so.4
  Title: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-08-07 (11 days ago)
  UserGroups:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1787802/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1773825] Re: Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impress recent docs, but Writer recent docs

2018-05-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => libreoffice (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773825

Title:
  Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impress recent docs,
  but Writer recent docs

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Impress 'Recently Used' list does not even give one Impress document,
  even if it was just saved one minute before.  It does give a huge list
  of Writer recently used documents.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1773825/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1773535] Re: Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email

2018-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => firefox (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773535

Title:
  Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I received an email from my healthcare provider, Aetna, requesting
  that I click on a link to take me to my login screen for a list of
  claims - they wanted some information.  Using Ubuntu, the link does
  create a new Firefox window, but that stays white and never progresses
  to anything at all.  Using Windows and Firefox, this new window
  immediately fills up with my login information and claims information,
  exactly as Aetna intended it to do.  I have tried the link with Ubuntu
  multiple times with identical results.  I have rebooted and there was
  no change.  I am up-to-date on updates.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1773535/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1716900] Re: apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716900

Title:
  apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  While trying to use the php installation delivered by
  https://launchpad.net/%7Eondrej/+archive/ubuntu/php, we found out,
  that the order within apt-get install change the solved packages.

  Which means if we do:
  apt-get install php-apcu php7.1-cli => installs newest php and 7.1
  apt-get install php7.1-cli php-apcu) => > installs only 7.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1716900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Crashed, reset my screen but kept all documents open I had

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: appstream 0.11.3-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-12.13-generic 4.13.3
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-12-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sat Sep 30 16:27:55 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/appstreamcli
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-07-25 (67 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release i386 (20170412)
  ProcCmdline: appstreamcli refresh-cache
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0xb7e0e0ba <g_variant_serialiser_needed_size+618>: 
pushl  (%eax)
   PC (0xb7e0e0ba) ok
   source "(%eax)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "(%esp)" (0xbfaca794) ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: appstream
  StacktraceTop:
   g_variant_serialiser_needed_size () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_variant_serialiser_needed_size () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  Title: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_serialiser_needed_size()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1720552/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1762292] Re: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
is fixes a bug which basically rendered HiDPI icons completely
  useless in AppStream under Debian/Ubuntu. Having this fix will make
  the use of HiDPI icons in software centers possible.

   * Check plain language string in as_component_localized_get as well

  Apparently, in some circumstances text was not properly localized due to that 
because the function did not check the language code alone after failing to 
find a localized string for the locale.
  Improved localization is a good thing.

   * qt: Define location and soname for all configurations, not just
  Debug

  This patch has been in Ubuntu before. Without it, Qt applications
  using AppStream wouldn't build at all in release mode.

   * Never override high-quality data with incomplete .desktop data

  Fixes an issue that would override more complete metadata with less
  complete versions and also change the metadata after the user
  installed an application.

   * Make data update script work with recent SPDX

  Just a maintenance improvement on the source code itself with no
  impact on the installed binaries and data.

   * Add a timeout to URL validity checks

  Before, appstreamcli would just hang forever when validating on
  systems with no network access, causing some annoyances especially on
  CI systems.

  The package is not causing issues in Debian and other distributions, so far 
there have been no new bug reports. In general, I think the risk of new issues 
is low, especially because the new features don't impact the existing common 
code paths much and are additions (although obviously there is no such thing as 
no regressions risk).
  I think the bugfixes especially on HiDPI icons and metadata replacement, as 
well as features like the updated SPDX license library and SPDX 3.0 support and 
that updating this package allows for a more recent appstream-generator package 
to be included make it reasonable to update the package.

  Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.11.8-3:

  appstream (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

* load-desktop-data.patch: Load desktop file data properly again

   -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:30:08 +0200

  appstream (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

* Make autopkgtest work again
* Update d/copyright (Closes: #894856)
* icon config: Pull in non-HiDPI config for large icons
  if large-icon HiDPI config is installed

   -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:12:26 +0200

  appstream (0.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

* New upstream version: 0.12.0
* Drop all patches: Applied upstream
* Update .symbols file
* d/rules: Drop obsolete --parallel flag
* Add APT config snippet packages for an easy way of enabling
  icon downloads for different sizes and HiDPI.

   -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:36:26 +0200

  Build logs and other QA data can be found at Debian:
  https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/appstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1762292/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1762292] Re: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
s just
  documentation changes.

  Bugfixes:
   * qt: Implement missing constructors

  This fixes some nasty crashes in Qt applications using AppStream, like
  Plasma Discover.

   * apt: escape the icon scale factor as it is using the arobase
  character

  This fixes a bug which basically rendered HiDPI icons completely
  useless in AppStream under Debian/Ubuntu. Having this fix will make
  the use of HiDPI icons in software centers possible.

   * Check plain language string in as_component_localized_get as well

  Apparently, in some circumstances text was not properly localized due to that 
because the function did not check the language code alone after failing to 
find a localized string for the locale.
  Improved localization is a good thing.

   * qt: Define location and soname for all configurations, not just
  Debug

  This patch has been in Ubuntu before. Without it, Qt applications
  using AppStream wouldn't build at all in release mode.

   * Never override high-quality data with incomplete .desktop data

  Fixes an issue that would override more complete metadata with less
  complete versions and also change the metadata after the user
  installed an application.

   * Make data update script work with recent SPDX

  Just a maintenance improvement on the source code itself with no
  impact on the installed binaries and data.

   * Add a timeout to URL validity checks

  Before, appstreamcli would just hang forever when validating on
  systems with no network access, causing some annoyances especially on
  CI systems.

  The package is not causing issues in Debian and other distributions, so far 
there have been no new bug reports. In general, I think the risk of new issues 
is low, especially because the new features don't impact the existing common 
code paths much and are additions (although obviously there is no such thing as 
no regressions risk).
  I think the bugfixes especially on HiDPI icons and metadata replacement, as 
well as features like the updated SPDX license library and SPDX 3.0 support and 
that updating this package allows for a more recent appstream-generator package 
to be included make it reasonable to update the package.

  Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.11.8-3:

  appstream (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

* load-desktop-data.patch: Load desktop file data properly again

   -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:30:08 +0200

  appstream (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

* Make autopkgtest work again
* Update d/copyright (Closes: #894856)
* icon config: Pull in non-HiDPI config for large icons
  if large-icon HiDPI config is installed

   -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:12:26 +0200

  appstream (0.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

* New upstream version: 0.12.0
* Drop all patches: Applied upstream
* Update .symbols file
* d/rules: Drop obsolete --parallel flag
* Add APT config snippet packages for an easy way of enabling
  icon downloads for different sizes and HiDPI.

   -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:36:26 +0200

  Build logs and other QA data can be found at Debian:
  https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/appstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1762292/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1762292] [NEW] FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
zation is a good thing.

 * qt: Define location and soname for all configurations, not just Debug

This patch has been in Ubuntu before. Without it, Qt applications using
AppStream wouldn't build at all in release mode.

 * Never override high-quality data with incomplete .desktop data

Fixes an issue that would override more complete metadata with less
complete versions and also change the metadata after the user installed
an application.

 * Make data update script work with recent SPDX

Just a maintenance improvement on the source code itself with no impact
on the installed binaries and data.

 * Add a timeout to URL validity checks

Before, appstreamcli would just hang forever when validating on systems
with no network access, causing some annoyances especially on CI
systems.

The package is not causing issues in Debian and other distributions, so far 
there have been no new bug reports. In general, I think the risk of new issues 
is low, especially because the new features don't impact the existing common 
code paths much and are additions (although obviously there is no such thing as 
no regressions risk).
I think the bugfixes especially on HiDPI icons and metadata replacement, as 
well as features like the updated SPDX license library and SPDX 3.0 support and 
that updating this package allows for a more recent appstream-generator package 
to be included make it reasonable to update the package.

Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.11.8-3:

appstream (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * load-desktop-data.patch: Load desktop file data properly again

 -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:30:08 +0200

appstream (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Make autopkgtest work again
  * Update d/copyright (Closes: #894856)
  * icon config: Pull in non-HiDPI config for large icons
if large-icon HiDPI config is installed

 -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:12:26 +0200

appstream (0.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 0.12.0
  * Drop all patches: Applied upstream
  * Update .symbols file
  * d/rules: Drop obsolete --parallel flag
  * Add APT config snippet packages for an easy way of enabling
icon downloads for different sizes and HiDPI.

 -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org>  Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:36:26 +0200

Build logs and other QA data can be found at Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/appstream

** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762292

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Please sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

  This introduces a new feature release pretty late in the cycle, so it
  is something to more carefully consider. Even if it's very late, I do
  think upgrading this package in Bionic is a good idea though.

  First of all, it makes upgrading the appstream-generator package to version 
0.7.1-3 possible, allowing people to generate much better and smaller metadata 
for Debian and Ubuntu repositories (and this is what sparked the creation of 
this sync request).
  But there are also many other good reasons.

  This is the NEWS file for the new release, with explanations on why we
  want the respective changes (I shuffled some entries around to form
  logical groups) :

  Version 0.12.0
  ~~
  Released: 2018-04-04

  Features:
   * Implement release types
   * qt: Support release types

  This adds a new feature to the AppStream specification and
  libappstream that allows release metadata to be tagged as
  "development" or "stable" releases. Nothing in Ubuntu uses this, so
  adding will not break anything, but having this in the LTS release
  means upstream projects can use this feature more easily, and Ubuntu
  will understand metadata containing it.

   * Update static data lists
   * spdx: Add some compatibility workarounds for SPDX 3.0
   * validator: Validate SPDX license expressions for metadata_license

  This updates the SPDX[1] license lists to version 3.0 and adds some 
compatibility glue to libappstream to parse the new license strings introduced 
in SPDX 3.0. This is very useful to have, because many projects will start 
using the new identifier, and it makes sense for AppStream in Ubuntu to be 
ready for that.
  Furthermore, it prevents errors from people using the new IDs with older 
AppStream versions (unfortunately, SPDX 3.0 broke the format, AppStream speaks 
all flavors of SPDX now, though)

  [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/

   * apt: Add config snippets to enable icon downloads

  This results in an easy way for users as well as software centers to
  enable the download of application icon 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1718453] Re: apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

2018-01-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@donkult: The downloads for all architectures are not allowed at time,
because doing so would lead to AppStream-ID collisions, and AppStream
itself has no notion of architectures (yet - I played around with that a
bit, but there is no definitive good solution yet).

For downloading Components-all, if we would generate such a file, could
APT be configured to download that one unconditionally, no matter what
the Releases file says? Because in that case, we could do quite a few
optimizations to save disk space.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718453

Title:
  apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and
  appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I noticed the following community member had a problem installing
  steam. I reproduced it on 16.04.3 clean install i386 and amd64.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24NH3Ry22Dg

  Install 16.04 amd64 or i386
  Install all updates via software updater
  Open Ubuntu Software
  Search for steam.

  No results for Steam found.
  Yet steam is in the repository as an i386 deb - but it doesn't show up in 
Ubuntu Software on either amd64 or i386 installs.

  
  Also discussed at 
https://ubuntu.labix.org/t/ubuntu-software-deb-install-issues/81

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-35.39~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-35-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Wed Sep 20 15:46:02 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-20 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20170801)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1718453/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1745029] Re: plasma-workspace FTBFS with appstream 0.11.8-1

2018-01-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745029

Title:
  plasma-workspace FTBFS with appstream 0.11.8-1

Status in AppStream:
  Fix Released
Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  plasma-workspace fails to build from source with with appstream
  0.11.8-1 synced from debian

  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-
  workspace/4:5.11.5-0ubuntu2

  [ 49%] Linking CXX shared module appstreamrunner.so
  cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/runners/appstream && /usr/bin/cmake 
-E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/appstreamrunner.dir/link.txt --verbose=1
  /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -std=c++0x 
-fno-operator-names -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wformat-security -Wno-long-long -Wpointer-arith -Wundef 
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Woverloaded-virtual -Werror=return-type -Wvla -Wdate-time 
-Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,--fatal-warnings -Wl,--enable-new-dtags 
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined 
-shared  -o appstreamrunner.so 
CMakeFiles/appstreamrunner.dir/appstreamrunner.cpp.o 
CMakeFiles/appstreamrunner.dir/appstreamrunner_autogen/mocs_compilation.cpp.o 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Runner.so.5.41.0 AppStreamQt-NOTFOUND 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Plasma.so.5.41.0 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Package.so.5.41.0 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Service.so.5.41.0 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5I18n.so.5.41.0 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5ConfigCore.so.5.41.0 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5CoreAddons.so.5.41.0 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Gui.so.5.9.3 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5.9.3 
  c++: error: AppStreamQt-NOTFOUND: No such file or directory

  
  (initially failed on just s390x, as that build did not get unblocked for 
meltdown fixes until after 0.11.8-1 was synced. Above rebuild confirmed failure 
then on all architectures)

  Seems other packages are also likely to fail if/when there are new
  builds

  e.g. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888144 for
  frameworkintegration

  I would note that doing test builds on Kubuntu CI, both upstream 5.12
  beta and master branches of plasma-workspace also fail to build in the
  same manner.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1745029/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1744941] Re: gnome-software crashes in as_app_parse_desktop_file

2018-01-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Wrong project, this is not in AppStream, but appstream-glib (thanks for
the patch though! :-) )

** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => appstream-glib (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744941

Title:
  gnome-software crashes in as_app_parse_desktop_file

Status in appstream-glib package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  See more at upstream bug: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-
  glib/pull/221

  This affects all the releases since xenial.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1744941/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1723802] Re: gnome-software: Something went wrong appears when launched

2017-12-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, then this is a new issue... Meh.
Verbose output would definitely help:
`killall gnome-software ; gnome-software --verbose`

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723802

Title:
  gnome-software: Something went wrong appears when launched

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  testing the release candidate.

  After installation, launched gnome software and editors picks and
  other software appear to be displayed correctly.  However at the top
  of the screen is "something went wrong" - screenshot is attached

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: gnome-software 3.26.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Sun Oct 15 22:05:14 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-15 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Beta i386 
(20171015)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-limba   N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.26.1-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1723802/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1723802] Re: gnome-software: Something went wrong appears when launched

2017-12-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I bet this is because GNOME Software is built with fwupd support, but the fwupd 
daemon is not installed.
Can you please check if the fwupd package is installed on your system?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723802

Title:
  gnome-software: Something went wrong appears when launched

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  testing the release candidate.

  After installation, launched gnome software and editors picks and
  other software appear to be displayed correctly.  However at the top
  of the screen is "something went wrong" - screenshot is attached

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: gnome-software 3.26.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Sun Oct 15 22:05:14 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-15 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Beta i386 
(20171015)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-limba   N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.26.1-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1723802/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2017-10-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This doesn't look like it is a bug in appstreamcli... I am not sure what
exactly went wrong there, because the GLib side looks fine as well.

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Crashed, reset my screen but kept all documents open I had

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: appstream 0.11.3-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-12.13-generic 4.13.3
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-12-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sat Sep 30 16:27:55 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/appstreamcli
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-07-25 (67 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release i386 (20170412)
  ProcCmdline: appstreamcli refresh-cache
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0xb7e0e0ba : 
pushl  (%eax)
   PC (0xb7e0e0ba) ok
   source "(%eax)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "(%esp)" (0xbfaca794) ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: appstream
  StacktraceTop:
   g_variant_serialiser_needed_size () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_variant_serialiser_needed_size () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  Title: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_serialiser_needed_size()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1720552/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1719077] Re: Unable to find codecs to play videos

2017-09-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Indeed, I can reproduce this. This issue affects Debian as well, and I wonder 
why nobody noticed it so far.
I have an idea on how to fix it.

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion)

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => packagekit (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719077

Title:
  Unable to find codecs to play videos

Status in packagekit package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  To reproduce:

  1. Open Totem
  2. Go to Channels and select The Guardian Videos
  3. Select any video
  4. Totem complains about missing codecs
  5. GNOME Software then complains that app-install-data is missing

  See screenshots.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: ubuntu-software 3.26.0-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-11.12-generic 4.13.1
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Sep 23 11:54:53 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-21 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170919)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-limba   N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap3.26.0-0ubuntu2
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1719077/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1718453] Re: Cannot install steam on a clean 16.04.3 machine

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Are you on a real i386 system, or on an amd64 system with i386 as
foreign architecture? The latter case is not supported, which is a known
issue (affects Steam and Skype).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718453

Title:
  Cannot install steam on a clean 16.04.3 machine

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I noticed the following community member had a problem installing
  steam. I reproduced it on 16.04.3 clean install i386 and amd64.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24NH3Ry22Dg

  Install 16.04 amd64 or i386
  Install all updates via software updater
  Open Ubuntu Software
  Search for steam.

  No results for Steam found.
  Yet steam is in the repository as an i386 deb - but it doesn't show up in 
Ubuntu Software on either amd64 or i386 installs.

  
  Also discussed at 
https://ubuntu.labix.org/t/ubuntu-software-deb-install-issues/81

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-35.39~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-35-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Wed Sep 20 15:46:02 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-20 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20170801)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1718453/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1718453] Re: Cannot install steam on a clean 16.04.3 machine

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It is there though, on i386: 
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/artful/multiverse/metainfo/steam.html
Maybe the multiverse sources aren't active here?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718453

Title:
  Cannot install steam on a clean 16.04.3 machine

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I noticed the following community member had a problem installing
  steam. I reproduced it on 16.04.3 clean install i386 and amd64.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24NH3Ry22Dg

  Install 16.04 amd64 or i386
  Install all updates via software updater
  Open Ubuntu Software
  Search for steam.

  No results for Steam found.
  Yet steam is in the repository as an i386 deb - but it doesn't show up in 
Ubuntu Software on either amd64 or i386 installs.

  
  Also discussed at 
https://ubuntu.labix.org/t/ubuntu-software-deb-install-issues/81

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-software 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-35.39~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-35-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Wed Sep 20 15:46:02 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-20 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20170801)
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1718453/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful

2017-09-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Did you restart GNOME Software after installing the plugin? And with
that I mean kill it completely, even its background process.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409

Title:
  Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I saw a news article with a link to install a flatpak.

  http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/09/download-pithos-pandora-app-1-4

  I clicked the link expecting to be able to install the flatpak, but
  the experience appears broken. I'm on an up to date Artful install

  What I did was:-

  Click on http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/09/download-pithos-pandora-app-1-4
  Click the flathub link:- 
https://flathub.org/repo/appstream/io.github.Pithos.flatpakref
  This downloaded the flatpakref file.
  I clicked the file in my browser, nothing happened

  I then tried finding the file in nautilus and double clicked it.
  GNOME Software launched and presented an error "Don't know how to handle 
'file:///home/alan/Downloads/io.github.Pithos.flatpakref' (see screenshot).

  If I search for pithos in GNOME Software I am able to find the older
  version from the deb repo, but not the newer version from flathub.

  Do we not support flatpak/flathub out of the box? Or is my system
  uniquely hosed?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1716409] Re: Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful

2017-09-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The GNOME Software Flatpak plugin is not installed by default.
Does installing the `gnome-software-plugin-flatpak` package fix this for you?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409

Title:
  Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I saw a news article with a link to install a flatpak.

  http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/09/download-pithos-pandora-app-1-4

  I clicked the link expecting to be able to install the flatpak, but
  the experience appears broken. I'm on an up to date Artful install

  What I did was:-

  Click on http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/09/download-pithos-pandora-app-1-4
  Click the flathub link:- 
https://flathub.org/repo/appstream/io.github.Pithos.flatpakref
  This downloaded the flatpakref file.
  I clicked the file in my browser, nothing happened

  I then tried finding the file in nautilus and double clicked it.
  GNOME Software launched and presented an error "Don't know how to handle 
'file:///home/alan/Downloads/io.github.Pithos.flatpakref' (see screenshot).

  If I search for pithos in GNOME Software I am able to find the older
  version from the deb repo, but not the newer version from flathub.

  Do we not support flatpak/flathub out of the box? Or is my system
  uniquely hosed?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1716409/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1699216] Re: Encrypted home support

2017-08-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
In that case, just propose the patches upstream ;-) That will help everyone.
I can maybe help with that and do a proper review later.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699216

Title:
  Encrypted home support

Status in accountsservice package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-initial-setup package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  In the CreateUser D-bus call, allow the home directory of the new user
  to be encrypted.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1699216/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1708569] Re: 1st. login fails to create a complete $HOME directory in a ubuntu-wayland (defacto default) session

2017-08-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
FTR, this is also resolved upstream now :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-user-dirs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708569

Title:
  1st. login fails to create a complete $HOME directory in a ubuntu-
  wayland (defacto default) session

Status in Xdg User Dirs:
  Confirmed
Status in xdg-user-dirs package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Test case:
  Use latest image (august 2 here
  Install, reboot
  Check contents of home folder

  Seen here:
  $ ls
  Desktop  examples.desktop

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: ubiquity (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-generic 4.11.8
  Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug  3 22:07:38 2017
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz.efi 
file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper quiet splash ---
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-08-04 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170802)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xdg-user-dirs/+bug/1708569/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1711986] Re: /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or corruption (fasttop): ADDR ***

2017-08-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Relevant patch: 
https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/28f90c3fd1926fa684370e550861a6704eb5498c
I forgot that Ubuntu was using a version that is affected by this - 
interestingly, it only started to manifest now.

I think applying the whole refactoring patch is the recommended thing to
do, instead of "just" fixing the corruption, because doing so will also
fix stock icon handling in this version of AppStream. This should get
some testing though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1711986

Title:
  /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or
  corruption (fasttop): ADDR ***

Status in appstream package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
appstream.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
0.9.4-1ubuntu3, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/1e136f3d63e3c33d2d2fd3d3812f9d0ff24cd054 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1711986/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1563155] Re: No Application Data Found

2017-07-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> 0x1142540~AsStore:store-from-file (gnome-software:26325): Gs-WARNING
**: failed to call gs_plugin_refine on appstream: Error opening file:
Permission denied

This doesn't look right.
What does `stat 
/var/lib/app-info/yaml/in.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_xenial_universe_dep11_Components-amd64.yml.gz`
 (or ls -l) tell you about the permissions/state of the file?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563155

Title:
  No Application Data Found

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I installed ubuntu 16.04 and when I go to the gnome software, it says
  "No Application Data Found". It is all greyed out and no apps are
  available for download.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1563155/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1563155] Re: No Application Data Found

2017-07-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
ni (nistra) wrote 6 hours ago: 
> ...
> I tried to report it opening an ticket by Foxit now.

Yes, thank you! Please link it here when you have a public ticket (I don't know 
if Foxit handles these bugs in public).
This bug will break other software wanting to place .desktop files in 
~/.local/share/applications/, so it would be good to get this resolved...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563155

Title:
  No Application Data Found

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I installed ubuntu 16.04 and when I go to the gnome software, it says
  "No Application Data Found". It is all greyed out and no apps are
  available for download.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1563155/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1563155] Re: No Application Data Found

2017-07-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> FoxitReader creates the file /home/nis/.local/share/applications

Are you sure it creates a *file* with that name? If so, that's a pretty
huge bug in FoxitReader's install process, and we should report it to
them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563155

Title:
  No Application Data Found

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I installed ubuntu 16.04 and when I go to the gnome software, it says
  "No Application Data Found". It is all greyed out and no apps are
  available for download.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1563155/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1698961] Re: System applications can be uninstalled using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 17.10

2017-07-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is a bug in appstream-glib, I reported it upstream at
https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues/175


** Bug watch added: github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues #175
   https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues/175

** Also affects: gnome-software via
   https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/issues/175
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => appstream-glib (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: gnome-software

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698961

Title:
  System applications can be uninstalled using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
  17.10

Status in appstream-glib package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Any application that has AppStream metadata can be uninstalled using GNOME 
Software on Ubuntu 17.10, including the core applications. I was able to remove 
many core GNOME/Ubuntu applications using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 17.10, even 
GNOME Software itself!
  This bug is similar to #1546636, but it's not exactly the same issue.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1698961/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1699216] Re: Encrypted home support

2017-06-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thank you for your work on this!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699216

Title:
  Encrypted home support

Status in accountsservice package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-initial-setup package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  In the CreateUser D-bus call, allow the home directory of the new user
  to be encrypted.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1699216/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1699216] Re: Encrypted home support

2017-06-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Amazing, just last week I added this to my todo list, since I'd need it in 
gnome-initial-setup.
I can test the patches, but ideally these should go upstream in the end.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699216

Title:
  Encrypted home support

Status in accountsservice package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-initial-setup package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  In the CreateUser D-bus call, allow the home directory of the new user
  to be encrypted.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1699216/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1698961] Re: System applications can be uninstalled using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 17.10

2017-06-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like a compulsory_for_desktop tag is missing then: 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-CollectionData.html#tag-ct-compulsory_for_desktop
Or it's set incorrectly.
In any case, this tag should be in effect now that Ubuntu is running the full 
GNOME, so I don't know why GS still allows you to remove key components like GS 
itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698961

Title:
  System applications can be uninstalled using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
  17.10

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Any application that has AppStream metadata can be uninstalled using GNOME 
Software on Ubuntu 17.10, including the core applications. I was able to remove 
many core GNOME/Ubuntu applications using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 17.10, even 
GNOME Software itself!
  This bug is similar to #1546636, but it's not exactly the same issue.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1698961/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1643134] Re: Switch gnome-software to use PackageKit backend

2017-05-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Regarding GStreamer:
Iain has made a patch for that: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/pull/193 
- looks good to me, and will definitely be in the next PK release / the Debian 
packaging.

To the second point: Couldn't the PK plugin be extended to support live
updates by default if set as a compile-time switch?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643134

Title:
  Switch gnome-software to use PackageKit backend

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  This is a tracking bug to switch gnome-software from the Ubuntu-
  specific apt backend to the PackageKit backend used by other distros.
  In particular this is the backend used by Debian.

  To build, just uncomment the commented-out packagekit line in gnome-
  software's debian/rules and remove libapt-pkg-dev from Build-Depends.
  (You can also drop aptdaemon from Depends.)

  Changes
  ===
  - It fixes some annoying bugs lingering in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: LP: #1551599.

  - It may also allow us to drop sessioninstaller (LP: #1661371)

  - On an individual app page, Source is listed as something like
  'ubuntu-zesty-universe' or ubuntu-yakkety-updates-main' or 'lp-ppa-
  gnome3-team-gnome3-staging-yakkety-main' instead of just 'Ubuntu'

  - On an individual app page, apps from multiverse or restricted will
  show License as 'Proprietary' (example: VirtualBox or Devede ). This
  also happens for locally installed apps (i.e. not matching what's in
  your apt sources). I don't think it happens for PPAs since everything
  in a PPA is in 'main'.

  - If you install an app using GNOME Software (or I assume another
  PackageKit app), it lists the date it was last installed or updated on
  the individual app page with a link to see its update history. (But
  the problem here is that update-manager doesn't use PK nor does apt on
  the command line.)

  - Any update, no matter how small, is only permitted as an offline
  update. The button says "Restart & Install". It does seem to work fine
  though.

  - Another bug is that installing or Removing an app inside GNOME
  Software is enough for it to "forget" about available Updates and
  think that everything is "up to date".

  (It looks like gnome-software 3.24 will let us completely disable
  gnome-software's update mechanism and the Updates tab by default so
  these previous two differences may be irrelevant then.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1643134/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1643134] Re: Switch gnome-software to use PackageKit backend

2017-05-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@jbicha: That was for Ubuntu's aptd GNOME Software backend, using Debconf with 
PackageKit is a little different (shouldn't be too hard to add, and I am rather 
confident that hughsie would even allow this feature upstream).
So, in Debian we'd need the PK version, as aptd is dead and removed from 
Debian. I did run a couple of tests with Debconf-using stuff and GNOME Software 
about a year ago, and the behavior then was that the questions didn't get asked 
but the transaction also wasn't blocked (as expected).
So, adding proper Debconf support to GS is "nice to have" at this point, but 
not essential at Debian.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643134

Title:
  Switch gnome-software to use PackageKit backend

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  This is a tracking bug to switch gnome-software from the Ubuntu-
  specific apt backend to the PackageKit backend used by other distros.
  In particular this is the backend used by Debian.

  To build, just uncomment the commented-out packagekit line in gnome-
  software's debian/rules and remove libapt-pkg-dev from Build-Depends.
  (You can also drop aptdaemon from Depends.)

  Changes
  ===
  - It fixes some annoying bugs lingering in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: LP: #1551599.

  - It may also allow us to drop sessioninstaller (LP: #1661371)

  - On an individual app page, Source is listed as something like
  'ubuntu-zesty-universe' or ubuntu-yakkety-updates-main' or 'lp-ppa-
  gnome3-team-gnome3-staging-yakkety-main' instead of just 'Ubuntu'

  - On an individual app page, apps from multiverse or restricted will
  show License as 'Proprietary' (example: VirtualBox or Devede ). This
  also happens for locally installed apps (i.e. not matching what's in
  your apt sources). I don't think it happens for PPAs since everything
  in a PPA is in 'main'.

  - If you install an app using GNOME Software (or I assume another
  PackageKit app), it lists the date it was last installed or updated on
  the individual app page with a link to see its update history. (But
  the problem here is that update-manager doesn't use PK nor does apt on
  the command line.)

  - Any update, no matter how small, is only permitted as an offline
  update. The button says "Restart & Install". It does seem to work fine
  though.

  - Another bug is that installing or Removing an app inside GNOME
  Software is enough for it to "forget" about available Updates and
  think that everything is "up to date".

  (It looks like gnome-software 3.24 will let us completely disable
  gnome-software's update mechanism and the Updates tab by default so
  these previous two differences may be irrelevant then.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1643134/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


  1   2   3   >