Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
I am aware of the SHA1 and tag confusion from earlier. After checking out 1.7.0-rc3, I was able to successfully package and run `mvn verify -Psunny`. +1
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
+0 Because the possibility that changes in 1.7.0 may be causing the lease recovery. I have no evidence of this. However I have done lots of testing with Accumulo 1.6.X on Hadoop 2.6.0 and have never seen this issue. I was able to successfully build Fluo against 1.7.0 and run all of its test. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 > > Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 > SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 > Staging Repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 > > Source tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an > artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI > w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 > nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. > > API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's > my +1. >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Great! Please include me in your recoverLease() investigations. I'll try to help out however possible. Eric Newton wrote: +1 My RW testing went well enough, and I didn't see failures until the cluster hung up.ACCUMULO-3818 is a test issue, and not a problem with accumulo. I was able to build 1.7.0 from the source tarball. I'll continue to investigate the recoverLease issue. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser wrote: In some of my testing on HDFS 2.6.0 and agitation, I believe leases weren't being recovered until the datanode was restarted (which agitation killed). Every time I jstack'ed the master, I saw it hung on the HDFS recoverLease() method. I saw nothing that suggested a bug in Accumulo (a nod towards Christopher's assessment). Eric Newton wrote: Can you quantify "Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS."? I think Keith and I are ok with the release. We're looking into our (shared) testing environment to figure out why Accumulo and HDFS are not getting along during recoveries. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Josh Elser wrote: 72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded. org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=19706560041 UNREFERENCED=29844289 Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS. Nothing super impactful. I believe that wraps up all required testing. Josh Elser wrote: 24hr CI just verified org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=5754999773 UNREFERENCED=6000227 Josh Elser wrote: 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. Josh Elser wrote: Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
+1 My RW testing went well enough, and I didn't see failures until the cluster hung up.ACCUMULO-3818 is a test issue, and not a problem with accumulo. I was able to build 1.7.0 from the source tarball. I'll continue to investigate the recoverLease issue. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > In some of my testing on HDFS 2.6.0 and agitation, I believe leases > weren't being recovered until the datanode was restarted (which agitation > killed). Every time I jstack'ed the master, I saw it hung on the HDFS > recoverLease() method. I saw nothing that suggested a bug in Accumulo (a > nod towards Christopher's assessment). > > > Eric Newton wrote: > >> Can you quantify "Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS."? >> >> I think Keith and I are ok with the release. We're looking into our >> (shared) testing environment to figure out why Accumulo and HDFS are not >> getting along during recoveries. >> >> -Eric >> >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >> 72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded. >>> >>> org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts >>> REFERENCED=19706560041 >>> UNREFERENCED=29844289 >>> >>> Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just >>> restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS. >>> Nothing super impactful. >>> >>> I believe that wraps up all required testing. >>> >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> 24hr CI just verified org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=5754999773 UNREFERENCED=6000227 Josh Elser wrote: 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. > > Josh Elser wrote: > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day >> CI >> w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation >> on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >> >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
In some of my testing on HDFS 2.6.0 and agitation, I believe leases weren't being recovered until the datanode was restarted (which agitation killed). Every time I jstack'ed the master, I saw it hung on the HDFS recoverLease() method. I saw nothing that suggested a bug in Accumulo (a nod towards Christopher's assessment). Eric Newton wrote: Can you quantify "Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS."? I think Keith and I are ok with the release. We're looking into our (shared) testing environment to figure out why Accumulo and HDFS are not getting along during recoveries. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Josh Elser wrote: 72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded. org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=19706560041 UNREFERENCED=29844289 Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS. Nothing super impactful. I believe that wraps up all required testing. Josh Elser wrote: 24hr CI just verified org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=5754999773 UNREFERENCED=6000227 Josh Elser wrote: 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. Josh Elser wrote: Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Can you quantify "Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS."? I think Keith and I are ok with the release. We're looking into our (shared) testing environment to figure out why Accumulo and HDFS are not getting along during recoveries. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > 72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded. > > org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts > REFERENCED=19706560041 > UNREFERENCED=29844289 > > Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just > restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS. > Nothing super impactful. > > I believe that wraps up all required testing. > > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> 24hr CI just verified >> >> org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts >> REFERENCED=5754999773 >> UNREFERENCED=6000227 >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded. org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=19706560041 UNREFERENCED=29844289 Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS. Nothing super impactful. I believe that wraps up all required testing. Josh Elser wrote: 24hr CI just verified org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=5754999773 UNREFERENCED=6000227 Josh Elser wrote: 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. Josh Elser wrote: Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
+1 * Verified sigs, hashes of jars and tarballs. * Jars are sealed and manifest points to correct SHA1 (8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d). * Source tarball matches git commit. * lib directory of -bin tarball contains same accumulo jars/artifacts built in this release ~ Full build looks okay, but I occassionally get test failures (either ZK propagation delays, or timeouts for other reasons). - ACCUMULO-3798 has been annoying me whenever I check the jars' contents on release votes, so I finally created an issue. It's low priority. - I'm concerned about the lease recovery issue Eric and Keith found, but since there doesn't seem to be a solution for that (or even a concrete identification of how it can happen), I'm inclined to think that it can wait until 1.7.1. Hopefully, that can happen relatively rapidly once fixed. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > Even though I had EC2 agitating my tablet servers for me, the reason the > test failed was a failed recovery due to lease recovery failure. This is > the same thing Keith saw with his CI test. We did make small changes to the > lease recovery code (dropped Hadoop 1 support), but I don't know why that > would make a difference. > > The fact that we're seeing this problem in multiple tests is troubling. > > I'm continuing to investigate the issue. > > -Eric > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > >> I've been running a RW test w/out agitation on a 21 node EC2 cluster. >> >> It died in the replication test. >> >> So I restarted it with one walker, just doing replication. >> >> Half the cluster died with zookeeper timeouts. I am investigating. >> >> I'll pull the source, build and review the results by EOB today. >> >> -Eric >> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. >>> >>> I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source >>> tarball, run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all >>> feedback is warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the >>> better. Thanks in advance. >>> >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: > The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on > 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC > branch. > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser > wrote: > >> Devs, >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 >> >> Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 >> SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 >> Staging Repository: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 >> >> >> Source tarball: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz >> >> Binary tarball: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz >> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an >> artifact.) >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 >> >> >> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day >> CI w/o >> agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 >> nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >> >> API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html >> >> >> API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html >> >> >> The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. >> Here's my >> +1. >> > >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Even though I had EC2 agitating my tablet servers for me, the reason the test failed was a failed recovery due to lease recovery failure. This is the same thing Keith saw with his CI test. We did make small changes to the lease recovery code (dropped Hadoop 1 support), but I don't know why that would make a difference. The fact that we're seeing this problem in multiple tests is troubling. I'm continuing to investigate the issue. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > I've been running a RW test w/out agitation on a 21 node EC2 cluster. > > It died in the replication test. > > So I restarted it with one walker, just doing replication. > > Half the cluster died with zookeeper timeouts. I am investigating. > > I'll pull the source, build and review the results by EOB today. > > -Eric > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. >> >> I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source >> tarball, run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all >> feedback is warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the >> better. Thanks in advance. >> >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >>> >>> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >>> >>> Christopher wrote: >>> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 > > Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 > SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 > Staging Repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 > > > Source tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz > > Binary tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an > artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 > > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day > CI w/o > agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 > nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. > > API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html > > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > > The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. > Here's my > +1. > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
+1 Looked over the repo and tarballs, verified the source tarball matches the git tag, verified I could generate the bin tarball from source, ran unit tests. Assuming everyone is satisfied with their CI and RW runs, I think this candidate is good. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 > > Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 > SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 > Staging Repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 > > Source tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an > artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI > w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 > nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. > > API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's > my +1. >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Verification on the 24hr CI w/o agitation test completed successfully last night. The CI w/ agitation test that I restarted hung again last night. Ran into the same HDFS issue w/ lease recovery. Maybe I should run w/o hdfs agitation. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > I am running two test on two 20 node EC2 clusters, CI w/ and w/o > agitation. For the agitation test I ran into HDFS-8406 which caused > Accumulo to flatline. I was able to get the test running again with a > special method devised by Eric N. We found the walog block in a datanode > dir and copied it into HDFS over the walog. After this the master was able > to recover the lease and continue running (w/ no data loss, ran an > intermediate verify). Unfortunately, this pushed back the completion time > for this CI w/ agitation test. Not sure if the test will complete before > the deadline. I really want to see the results of this test before voting. > > My cluster that was running CI w/ agitation has completed 24hr of ingest > and is currently verifying. > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. >> >> I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source >> tarball, run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all >> feedback is warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the >> better. Thanks in advance. >> >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >>> >>> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >>> >>> Christopher wrote: >>> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 > > Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 > SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 > Staging Repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 > > > Source tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz > > Binary tarball: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an > artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 > > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day > CI w/o > agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 > nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. > > API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html > > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > > The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. > Here's my > +1. > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
I've been running a RW test w/out agitation on a 21 node EC2 cluster. It died in the replication test. So I restarted it with one walker, just doing replication. Half the cluster died with zookeeper timeouts. I am investigating. I'll pull the source, build and review the results by EOB today. -Eric On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. > > I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source tarball, > run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all feedback is > warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the better. Thanks > in advance. > > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >> >> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >> >> Christopher wrote: >> >>> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on >>> 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC >>> branch. >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 Source tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my +1. >>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
I am running two test on two 20 node EC2 clusters, CI w/ and w/o agitation. For the agitation test I ran into HDFS-8406 which caused Accumulo to flatline. I was able to get the test running again with a special method devised by Eric N. We found the walog block in a datanode dir and copied it into HDFS over the walog. After this the master was able to recover the lease and continue running (w/ no data loss, ran an intermediate verify). Unfortunately, this pushed back the completion time for this CI w/ agitation test. Not sure if the test will complete before the deadline. I really want to see the results of this test before voting. My cluster that was running CI w/ agitation has completed 24hr of ingest and is currently verifying. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. > > I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source tarball, > run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all feedback is > warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the better. Thanks > in advance. > > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >> >> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >> >> Christopher wrote: >> >>> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on >>> 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC >>> branch. >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 Source tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my +1. >>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source tarball, run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all feedback is warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the better. Thanks in advance. Josh Elser wrote: You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 Source tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
24hr CI just verified org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=5754999773 UNREFERENCED=6000227 Josh Elser wrote: 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. Josh Elser wrote: Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. Josh Elser wrote: Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Yeah, that worked. I was using `git remote update` which seemed to download all the other tags... but not these new ones. SMH: I dunno. Thanks. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > git fetch --tags? > > > Christopher wrote: >> >> Weird. I see the email, but my git client can't pull it for some reason. >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> I thought I did push a tag.. >>> >>> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commit;h=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >>> >>> >>> Christopher wrote: Cool. Can you push an rc branch (or tag) containing this commit, so I can verify it matches the src.tar.gz? Thanks! -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. > > The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d > > > Christopher wrote: >> >> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on >> 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC >> branch. >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser >> wrote: >>> >>> Devs, >>> >>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 >>> >>> Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 >>> SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 >>> Staging Repository: >>> >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 >>> >>> Source tarball: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz >>> Binary tarball: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz >>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for >>> an >>> artifact.) >>> >>> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>> >>> 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 >>> >>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day >>> CI >>> w/o >>> agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on >>> 3 >>> nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >>> >>> API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html >>> >>> API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html >>> >>> The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. >>> Here's >>> my >>> +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
git fetch --tags? Christopher wrote: Weird. I see the email, but my git client can't pull it for some reason. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Elser wrote: I thought I did push a tag.. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commit;h=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: Cool. Can you push an rc branch (or tag) containing this commit, so I can verify it matches the src.tar.gz? Thanks! -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote: You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 Source tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Weird. I see the email, but my git client can't pull it for some reason. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > I thought I did push a tag.. > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commit;h=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d > > > Christopher wrote: >> >> Cool. Can you push an rc branch (or tag) containing this commit, so I >> can verify it matches the src.tar.gz? Thanks! >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >>> >>> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >>> >>> >>> Christopher wrote: The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 > > Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 > SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 > Staging Repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 > > Source tarball: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an > artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI > w/o > agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 > nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. > > API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: > > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: > > > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. > Here's > my > +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
I thought I did push a tag.. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commit;h=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: Cool. Can you push an rc branch (or tag) containing this commit, so I can verify it matches the src.tar.gz? Thanks! -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote: You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 Source tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
Cool. Can you push an rc branch (or tag) containing this commit, so I can verify it matches the src.tar.gz? Thanks! -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. > > The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d > > > Christopher wrote: >> >> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on >> 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC >> branch. >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> Devs, >>> >>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 >>> >>> Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 >>> SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 >>> Staging Repository: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 >>> >>> Source tarball: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz >>> Binary tarball: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz >>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an >>> artifact.) >>> >>> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>> >>> 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 >>> >>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI >>> w/o >>> agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 >>> nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >>> >>> API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html >>> >>> API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html >>> >>> The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's >>> my >>> +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d Christopher wrote: The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 Source tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC branch. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 > > Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 > SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 > Staging Repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 > > Source tarball: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an > artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 > > Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI w/o > agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 > nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. > > API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: > http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. Here's my > +1.
