Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. +1 -J. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] x22801 netbeans.org ant.apache.org if I had known it was harmless I would have killed it myself - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Martijn Kruithof wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me begin with my +1 I'm +1 too, hopefully this release will match the schedules of the IDEs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JSPC needs to be deprecated; it wont work against 5.x, people should > use tomcat's own. Which we already tell them in the manual - nevertheless, there will be people who still use Tomcat 4.x (me, for example, but I don't use jspc). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Should we wait a few more days? Maybe yes. Of the 260+ reports that are real bug reports (not enhancement requests), there are > 20 reports against optional SCM tasks nobody of us can test, > 20 reports against J2EE tasks for containers nobody of us uses and around 10 against jspc and ejbjar each, which I don't use and don't have the environment or knowledge to test either. I could set up VSS and starteam support in a vmware image; perforce is also a freebie, leaving clearcase. If anyone else has VMWare *and* an MSDN license I could share with them the resulting image. JSPC needs to be deprecated; it wont work against 5.x, people should use tomcat's own. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to check spelling of all the html docs over the next > couple of days, I think there already is an open bug report with ispell results ... > I know that there are a couple of doc patches in bugzilla, could we > roll them out for 1.6.3, as they are unlikely to break any builds > ;-) +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, > let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) +1 I'm going to check spelling of all the html docs over the next couple of days, I know that there are a couple of doc patches in bugzilla, could we roll them out for 1.6.3, as they are unlikely to break any builds ;-) Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) [X] Yes [ ] No Let me begin with my +1 +1 Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me begin with my +1 +1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
so +1 for 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d from me then. Peter Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? I somehow managed to miss that you are *not* talking about tomorrow. Next week would work for me, I don't think I'll be allowed to code on Easter weekend. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? I somehow managed to miss that you are *not* talking about tomorrow. Next week would work for me, I don't think I'll be allowed to code on Easter weekend. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
Should we wait a few more days? Maybe yes. I do have a few bug assigned to me that I want to fix, basically javadoc and cvstagdiff. The later will involve adding a new class and has the potential to cause trouble, so I'd feel more comfortable if we waited two more days (either I get things done until tomorrow evening my time, or I won't this week). And then I'm holding back two patches that I want to see confirmed before I merge them. If we don't get confirmation, they'll stay in CVS HEAD - if we get confirmation that the nightly builds work, I don't have a problem with merging them between RC and final release. After that there will still be about ten or twenty reports that I could look into, but I should get real and say I won't manage to do so before 1.6.3. If we want to get this ready by April, that is. My query ant_open_bug yields 736 bugs. Which of the bugs are worth looking into? btw I'd also be in favour of having RC1 out this month, 23 seems a bit too short given the other reactions. +1 on any date this month Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
As a user of Ant My Vote is +1 to release new version On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:23:37 +0100, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Should we wait a few more days? > > Maybe yes. > > I do have a few bug assigned to me that I want to fix, basically > javadoc and cvstagdiff. The later will involve adding a new class and > has the potential to cause trouble, so I'd feel more comfortable if we > waited two more days (either I get things done until tomorrow evening > my time, or I won't this week). > > And then I'm holding back two patches that I want to see confirmed > before I merge them. If we don't get confirmation, they'll stay in > CVS HEAD - if we get confirmation that the nightly builds work, I > don't have a problem with merging them between RC and final release. > > After that there will still be about ten or twenty reports that I > could look into, but I should get real and say I won't manage to do so > before 1.6.3. If we want to get this ready by April, that is. > > Of the 260+ reports that are real bug reports (not enhancement > requests), there are > 20 reports against optional SCM tasks nobody of > us can test, > 20 reports against J2EE tasks for containers nobody of > us uses and around 10 against jspc and ejbjar each, which I don't use > and don't have the environment or knowledge to test either. > > And many reports are of the "really an enhancement request", "not > really a bug" or "we should mark it as WONTFIX" category. > > Stefan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we wait a few more days? Maybe yes. I do have a few bug assigned to me that I want to fix, basically javadoc and cvstagdiff. The later will involve adding a new class and has the potential to cause trouble, so I'd feel more comfortable if we waited two more days (either I get things done until tomorrow evening my time, or I won't this week). And then I'm holding back two patches that I want to see confirmed before I merge them. If we don't get confirmation, they'll stay in CVS HEAD - if we get confirmation that the nightly builds work, I don't have a problem with merging them between RC and final release. After that there will still be about ten or twenty reports that I could look into, but I should get real and say I won't manage to do so before 1.6.3. If we want to get this ready by April, that is. Of the 260+ reports that are real bug reports (not enhancement requests), there are > 20 reports against optional SCM tasks nobody of us can test, > 20 reports against J2EE tasks for containers nobody of us uses and around 10 against jspc and ejbjar each, which I don't use and don't have the environment or knowledge to test either. And many reports are of the "really an enhancement request", "not really a bug" or "we should mark it as WONTFIX" category. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
> Should we wait a few more days? Fine with me. Do we want to do it beginning of April ? Antoine > > Peter > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? > >> > >> > > > >I won't be ready with the bugs I intend to fix by then, but I can do > >so even after the RC, right? > > > >Just announce when you need a stable repo so that I don't > >accidentially commit anything to the branch while you prepare the RC. > > > >Stefan > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
Should we wait a few more days? Peter Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? I won't be ready with the bugs I intend to fix by then, but I can do so even after the RC, right? Just announce when you need a stable repo so that I don't accidentially commit anything to the branch while you prepare the RC. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? +1 I think I'd like to backport the RMI fix for Java1.5 in; I cant think of any other Java1.5-breaks-us patch that needs to go over. steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? I won't be ready with the bugs I intend to fix by then, but I can do so even after the RC, right? Just announce when you need a stable repo so that I don't accidentially commit anything to the branch while you prepare the RC. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
Do we want to make a ant 1.6.3 RC1 on Wednesday, March 23d ? [x ] Yes (if we've addressed all the bugs/issues that we can) [ ] No - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
