Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill
Congrats Dave! On 07-Sep-2013, at 7:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Dave Cahill to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Dave has been an active member of the community for quite awhile, and has provided us with things such as the midonet plugin, multiple patches, bugfixes, feedback, and suggestions. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Please join us in congratulating Dave!
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
+1 (binding) followed the testing procedure On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks Animesh On Sep 6, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:18:35PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round) Animesh, I'd ask that this vote stay open until EOD Monday. I've tested the basic sig / artifact, but I want an opportunity to run it in an actual environment before formally voting. [Animesh] Sure I can keep the VOTE open until Monday. Also, there is an issue being raised by Marcus (that Edison was going to look into) in another thread around the CPVM. Is this a blocker issue? [Animesh]Edison is working on a fix and will put in 4.2-forward branch. I am not sure who else uses CLVM to access the broader impact, if it is Marcus and he is fine with using Edison's fix in his environment than not an issue. Ha... I thought it was around the cPvm, not cLvm. Anyway, I guess it's up to Marcus (and others) to vote accordingly WRT there concern about this issue. Thanks for holding off until EOD Monday for me (and perhaps others) to vote! -chip Of course more testing and feedback of RC is better
Re: [GSoC] Can not access SSVM + CPVM with KVM + Openvswitch
2013/9/6 Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com Next Step: Attempt to assign IP address manually and try pinging and CS MGMT host If fails - review your network setup and confirm VM is connect to proper virtual switch/bridge/portgroup that can access CS MGMT host. I think the issue is with your network setup , unless you can ping CS host. I'll check it. Hope it works Hi Musayev, I manually assigned IP address for system vms, it worked. Don't know why they were not assigned IP automatically. -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill
Congratulations Dave! 2013/9/7 Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com Congrats Dave! On 07-Sep-2013, at 7:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Dave Cahill to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Dave has been an active member of the community for quite awhile, and has provided us with things such as the midonet plugin, multiple patches, bugfixes, feedback, and suggestions. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Please join us in congratulating Dave! -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill
Congrats Dave. -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 7:51 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Dave Cahill to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Dave has been an active member of the community for quite awhile, and has provided us with things such as the midonet plugin, multiple patches, bugfixes, feedback, and suggestions. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Please join us in congratulating Dave!
RE: SystemVM downloading
Rohit, HyperV systemvm template is built with Linux Integration services from MS linux.iso? Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 11:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SystemVM downloading I did not follow any changes to the systemvm building code using veewee, but you can hack the code and see if we're not building hyperv as part of the build job now. Months ago, when I wrote that I had saved few built systemvmtemplates for all hypervisors here, you may find one for hyperv (note: hyperv's VHD format is different from xen's, had busted many hours to get it right); http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/systemvmtemplates/ Hope this helps. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.comwrote: I thought I'd be able to download systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd from http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ However, I don't see a link to do so. Is systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd or other recent copy online anywhere? DL
Re: SystemVM downloading
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.comwrote: Rohit, HyperV systemvm template is built with Linux Integration services from MS linux.iso? Not sure if you're asking me or telling me. I don't know how it is built now, would love to learn if there are any changes and to understand them. Previously I had write some scripts which worked with veewee and produced the systemvmtemplates using VirtualBox as host, the idea was one should be able to create them on their computers using free or opensource software without needing any specific platform. This is a previously build hyperv template using those scripts, veewee and VBox: http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/systemvmtemplates/systemvmtemplate-2013-04-11-master-hyperv.vhd.bz2 Cheers. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 11:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SystemVM downloading I did not follow any changes to the systemvm building code using veewee, but you can hack the code and see if we're not building hyperv as part of the build job now. Months ago, when I wrote that I had saved few built systemvmtemplates for all hypervisors here, you may find one for hyperv (note: hyperv's VHD format is different from xen's, had busted many hours to get it right); http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/systemvmtemplates/ Hope this helps. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote: I thought I'd be able to download systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd from http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ However, I don't see a link to do so. Is systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd or other recent copy online anywhere? DL
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill
Congrats Dave. -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 7:51 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Dave Cahill to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Dave has been an active member of the community for quite awhile, and has provided us with things such as the midonet plugin, multiple patches, bugfixes, feedback, and suggestions. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Please join us in congratulating Dave!
RE: SystemVM downloading
I had used the template from the Jenkins job, It was giving me error that file is corrupted. Am not sure how Jenkins job is building those templates, will go through the job/script to figure out. Thank for the info. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 9:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SystemVM downloading On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.comwrote: Rohit, HyperV systemvm template is built with Linux Integration services from MS linux.iso? Not sure if you're asking me or telling me. I don't know how it is built now, would love to learn if there are any changes and to understand them. Previously I had write some scripts which worked with veewee and produced the systemvmtemplates using VirtualBox as host, the idea was one should be able to create them on their computers using free or opensource software without needing any specific platform. This is a previously build hyperv template using those scripts, veewee and VBox: http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/systemvmtemplates/systemvmtemplate-2013-04-11-master-hyperv.vhd.bz2 Cheers. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 11:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SystemVM downloading I did not follow any changes to the systemvm building code using veewee, but you can hack the code and see if we're not building hyperv as part of the build job now. Months ago, when I wrote that I had saved few built systemvmtemplates for all hypervisors here, you may find one for hyperv (note: hyperv's VHD format is different from xen's, had busted many hours to get it right); http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/systemvmtemplates/ Hope this helps. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote: I thought I'd be able to download systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd from http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ However, I don't see a link to do so. Is systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd or other recent copy online anywhere? DL
Re: HA redundant virtual router
H Sheng, thanks. Will raad it soon and comment or propose additions/alterations mobile biligual spell checker used Op 6 sep. 2013 00:27 schreef Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org het volgende: Here is the doc. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Redundant+Virtual+Router+Functional+Spec It's not extremely detail, but describe today's design generally. --Sheng On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote: ok, let's postpone the discussion till you are at least halve done. We will of course continue to deliberate on what we need internally. Daan On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: Hi Daan, As I said, I am writing a design doc to describe the current redundant router policy, to help understanding redundant router. Current it doesn't support VPC, so how to implement it in VPC is still open to discuss. --Sheng On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Sheng, just to make sure; You are going to write this document? I see Roeland understood your mail like this. When you do, I'd like you to keep in mind that we also want redundant routers within a VPC to ensure ACS upgrades are more seamless for customer application groups and - dtap streets. If you need any help on writing such a doc, let me know. kind regards, Daan On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Roeland Kuipers rkuip...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Sheng, Thanks for the info. Looking forward to the design doc, I trust this will make things clearer. In the meantime will be doing some research and thinking too, to see how we can improve things to also have HA on the RvR in a safe way. We will share this once ready. Thanks, Roeland From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: donderdag 29 augustus 2013 0:19 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: int-cloud; Daan Hoogland Subject: Re: HA redundant virtual router Hi Roeland, I would write a design doc to explain how redundant router works currently. For example, for the point 2, we have to force BACKUP become MASTER because: 1. CS cannot communicate with MASTER at the time 2. CS can communicate with BACKUP. 3. Rule has to be programmed immediately. 4. In case old MASTER come back, it should yield to the VR with updated rule, rather than preempt the updated VR. In this case, CS need to communicate with RvR to program the new rule, thus it need to intervene the RvR to ensure that if there is only one VR got the rule, it should become MASTER. Still, I would write a doc later to try to cover every concern of RvR design. --Sheng On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Roeland Kuipers rkuip...@schubergphilis.commailto:rkuip...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Sheng, Thanks for your reply. I'll see if we can replay this scenario. With respect to point 1: a good principal IMHO. Point 2: Why do we force a keepalived node to become master and not wait for keepalived to become master? This way there is less reason to intervene and less risk of multiple masters? As we have seen this behavior with RvR without HA in the past. The downside that updates to rules do not function until backup becomes master. But maybe this is wise anyways since there is something wrong. This conflicts a bit with point 2 as we do intervene here. Point 3: In my opinion keepalived is solid enough to leave this responsibility with keepalived and that CS just should check the state and not fiddle with priorities to force masters. Because there is obviously a reason why BACKUP refuses to become master. I think we should let keepalived prevent multiple master as is designed to prevent this. Or do I miss something here? Actually in the scenario you described, with a functioning guest network, keepalived should be able to handle this situation if we make sure all routers have different prios. I still have the opinion HA and RvR are different mechanisms. So what do you think is necessary to have the possibility of HA icw RvR? We have a clear business requirement to have this implement on CS. And we have Developers willing to create these changes to make this possible. We also like to see RvR on VPC's and are also willing to contribute this functionality. Thanks for your feedback! Cheers, Roeland -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.orgmailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: vrijdag 23 augustus 2013 23:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: HA redundant virtual router Hi Roeland, Thank you for your testing! Power off is not an concern right now, because at that time the VM would disappear anyway. Our concern is more about if VM is still
Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4323) cloudstack 4.1.1 missing add guest network button
It is my fault, already fixed by https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=697246d7e1edacba3c341f691d525b9123a57811 you can change system.js manually in 4.1 2013/9/7, brucelee (JIRA) j...@apache.org: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] brucelee updated CLOUDSTACK-4323: - Attachment: bug.png Installed RPMS: cloudstack-cli-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-common-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-management-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-usage-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-awsapi-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack 4.1.1 missing add guest network button -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-4323 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4323 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.1.1 Environment: centos 6.4 [root@slo-cnvirtadmin001 management]# rpm -qa|grep cloud cloudstack-usage-4.1.0-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-common-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-awsapi-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-management-4.1.1-0.el6.x86_64 Reporter: danny webb Priority: Critical Attachments: bug.png, cloudstack_ui.png Hi, It seems that the Add guest network button in the infrastructure - zones - zonename - physical network - guest is missing in 4.1.1. I can no longer add VLAN tagged networks / shared networks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[ACS 42] Closing Resolved defects
Team, Almost 1600 defects are closed but still there are around 250 that are in resolved state. It would be great if you can validate the fix and close it ASAP. Reporter Total Abhinandan Prateek 2 Ahmad Emneina 2 Alena Prokharchyk 12 angeline shen5 Anthony Xu4 Ashutosk Kelkar 1 Bharat Kumar12 Brian Angus1 Brian Federle 2 Brian Spindler2 Chandan Purushothama 15 Chiradeep Vittal 1 Dave Brosius 1 David Noland 1 david vz1 Devdeep Singh 3 Diogo Monteiro1 edison su 1 Fang Wang 4 Francois Gaudreault 1 Gaurav Aradhye 1 Harikrishna Patnala 7 Hiroaki Kawai 2 Hongtu Zang 2 Hugo Trippaers 1 ilya musayev 3 Isaac Chiang 3 Jayapal Reddy 3 Jessica Tomechak2 Jessica Wang 2 John Burwell 3 Kelven Yang 2 Kishan Kavala 9 Koushik Das1 Likitha Shetty 5 Marcus Sorensen 1 Max Clark1 Mice Xia 1 Milamber2 Minying Bao 2 Murali Reddy 8 Nick Wales 1 Nitin Mehta19 Parth Jagirdar1 Paul Angus 1 Prachi Damle 8 Pranav Saxena 1 Prasanna Santhanam 4 Radhika Nair 7 Rajesh Battala 3 Ram Ganesh 2 Rayees Namathponnan5 roxanne chang 1 sadhu suresh 4 Sailaja Mada 5 Saksham Srivastava 8 Sangeetha Hariharan 4 Sanjay Tripathi 1 Sanjeev N 5 Sateesh Chodapuneedi 11 sebastien goasguen2 Shane Witbeck 1 Shanker Balan 1 Sheng Yang 2 shweta agarwal2 Simon Waterhouse 1 Simon Weller 1 Sowmya Krishnan3 Sreekanth Challa 1 Srikanteswararao Talluri2 Sudha Ponnaganti 1 Toshiaki Hatano2 Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati 4 venkata swamybabu budumuru 2 XxYton 1 Grand Total250 Thanks /sudha
Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model
There has been much discussion recently on the board about refactoring/rearchitecting. There are some great ideas being thrown around, but I would like to see a focus on testing prior to any of this work, so we can see what breaks after the major changes. It would be nice if we could dedicate a whole release to testing and bugfixing, I feel like the testing coverage is never going to catch up at the current rate. As a bonus, such a release might actually hit it's release goal date. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote: John, I mentioned before I'd been thinking up some ideas that go along with some of the things you've proposed here. I'm working through a lot of different ideas right now, but I've thrown up some notes in a totally random part of the CloudStack wiki. Take a look, this is a complete work in progress, but you can maybe get an idea of where my head is going (complete with really bad grammar and typos). Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Nothing+to+see+here...#Nothingtoseehere...-ModuleSystem Some code too: https://github.com/ibuildthecloud/cloudstack-modules This is based off of stuff I've done in the past. So nothing is too hand wavy. Darren
