Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
Recent reply from Vadim: http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote: Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar. -- Andrija Panić
RE: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
From the xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS settings) for that particular vm . -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling. Recent reply from Vadim: http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote: Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar. -- Andrija Panić
Re: Review Request 22511: Allow use of simulator hypervisor from client gui
On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:19 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: Looks like a handy feature, Leo can you send a new patch or have a discussion if we should have it? As Prasanna notes, this is not needed in production. Leo Simons wrote: Hey Rohit thanks for checking in. It looks like I commented way back when, but the reply was left as a draft due to my inability to understand reviewboard. Ugh: As I understand it, simulator is only shown if * the simulator hypervisor .jar plugin is included in the .war, and * the runtime config then specifies it as an available hypervisor so it's already hidden unless you're very specific about wanting to show it...? I completely forgot about it, and since then I've had about 0 time to look at selenium testing and whatnot. Looking at it with a bit of experience I guess we could have the simulator build go and patch up the javascript sources or something like that, but, I don't think its useful to put that in if we're not going to have tests to go with it. So I guess we can close this for now. Alright, I would still love to have the sql related change so developers can use something like cloudmonkey or psCloudStack to deploy VMs on simulator and play around. - Rohit --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/#review64033 --- On June 12, 2014, 12:31 p.m., Leo Simons wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/ --- (Updated June 12, 2014, 12:31 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6903 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6903 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6903 for details. Diffs - setup/db/hypervisor_capabilities.simulator.sql 32f9aaa ui/scripts/system.js 7e3b457 ui/scripts/zoneWizard.js 0a84bdb Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/diff/ Testing --- Ran mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator CTRL+C mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator Then hand-clicked in the web browser, and followed the wizard to create a new zone using the simulator hpv. (hosts must be named starting with sim for discovery to work). Then, re-set database, skipped the wizard and created zone/cluster/host/etc manually. Thanks, Leo Simons
Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue
Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest template version? Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as the sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user. The advantage I see with this is we need not do a patch release even if we miss to update. ~Rajani
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #759
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest template version? Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as the sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user. The advantage I see with this is we need not do a patch release even if we miss to update. I am ot sure I follow so let me phrase what I think should be one: systemvm replace code should be written that also edits the MinVRVersion. On upgrade this code should be run if an upgrade is needed. Missing in this is the problem that might occur when someone upgrades a systemvm and then has to upgrade to a version that also upgrades the system vm. For this we must introduce a patch level version that we promise never to touch as devs, so that users can use this for their own versions. Just making it configurable leaves a responsibility that is ours with the user. They shouldn't be able to make the mistake of entering to high a number for instance. -- Daan
Re: [CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds
ShapeBlue has created a patch that fixes this issue for Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 users, it available from their “main” deb/rpm repository. ShapeBlue has also published Apache CloudStack 4.4.2 debs/rpms on their main and upstream repositories. Repository: http://shapeblue.com/packages Release notes: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/wiki/Apache-CloudStack-4.3.1-ShapeBlue-Patch02 Source tag 4.3.1-shapeblue-02: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/releases/tag/shapeblue-4.3.1-02 Regards. On 09-Dec-2014, at 1:41 am, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds CVSS: 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Vendors: The Apache Software Foundation Citrix, Inc. Versions Afffected: Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4 Description: Apache CloudStack may be configured to authenticate LDAP users. When so configured, it performs a simple LDAP bind with the name and password provided by a user. Simple LDAP binds are defined with three mechanisms (RFC 4513): 1) username and password; 2) unauthenticated if only a username is specified; and 3) anonymous if neither username or password is specified. Currently, Apache CloudStack does not check if the password was provided which could allow an attacker to bind as an unauthenticated user. Mitigation: Users of Apache CloudStack 4.4 and derivatives should update to the latest version (4.4.2) An updated release for Apache CloudStack 4.3.2 is in testing. Until that is released, we recommend following the mitigation below: By default, many LDAP servers are not configured to allow unauthenticated binds. If the LDAP server in use allow this behaviour, a potential interim solution would be to consider disabling unauthenticated binds. Credit: This issue was identified by the Citrix Security Team. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUhgUCAAoJEOom9N0pCN7SOQMQAKyBuhg25u3FcVOU5XMdGGpT 2kSVFoLFR74ObI8bdr3HP+2LdLf/Go9QBBrWlZ034FUj6OV0Ct5o8TNB6AHbv0qF Ar4N05JoGtPaDCe9sWV/+ykOJH8snQjnYwVFrLZlLw8Y/JUQ+I1yJBksw8a2/hT2 vmYgYiAQyrEMMk4bhBBlEyaJFMhuMtKtgUqLDW8wmlhkt2acZMt/0BKxDwAO8o7m 6ypepPCmkPHUpD50tfcCI+K4ib/C5EOn40n4orM97/JHZLsCyhz5nk36eQMOQQz2 fJlaA04fQSV4Cv7c+S0LPh5e4e6TPSrOW3O4/V2dkjK/GgP8kUoo7ivyjIw6d2oJ Z5vqqgxrmgwDjH58YfVu3tyVuDlOFTZfCLkhdoXMxHfMLYYKeXkffRli9XabxrE+ AkVoXaQAumf8IzTLVSQztV18jC79kvEeCV0pFYOjb/X/gShemruqmCWVDulj1ax6 tzoP+Bm2mQRyrRClY37R+q3cQ2z6eNAC/vAoYzhYBN1o63MYneLYDADhyE6YIGz0 LTbDDGFn0WVdFDrqworHdYDIMW7HQFMNtsQuueeP7LBldsgyTmjmBMp+S3Tq27UT RaVgp3n9ZUPdzj/i1vvJBrATKUNmv1GDoy+C1GPNx423nEOe7dFkMJARlcbf5Pml 03DX+ot4Xan0P5HXPT+r =QqOf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: make the VPN feature work more reliable a...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/54 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue
I understand the problem now and agree that configurable isnt an option here. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. ~Rajani On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest template version? Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as the sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user. The advantage I see with this is we need not do a patch release even if we miss to update. I am ot sure I follow so let me phrase what I think should be one: systemvm replace code should be written that also edits the MinVRVersion. On upgrade this code should be run if an upgrade is needed. Missing in this is the problem that might occur when someone upgrades a systemvm and then has to upgrade to a version that also upgrades the system vm. For this we must introduce a patch level version that we promise never to touch as devs, so that users can use this for their own versions. Just making it configurable leaves a responsibility that is ours with the user. They shouldn't be able to make the mistake of entering to high a number for instance. -- Daan
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #760
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
about to MERGE
H, I had a contribution from colleague on master that I cherry-picked on 4.4 and 4.5. I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute. please alert me if this is inconvenient. -- Daan
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Ovmsupport
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9#issuecomment-66262896 Hi Funs, Thanks for replying. Alright let us know when you've good set of integration tests, I'm halfway with a new integration testing system semi-automated by ansible that uses CloudStack to test CloudStack. In that I run KVM, Xen etc. as VMs on KVM hosts all managed by CloudStack. Regards. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...
GitHub user axel-delahaye-wl opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55 Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM creation step https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/ You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/worldline/cloudstack master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #55 commit 068e508e3baa92295788920f521b96eefd442796 Author: Jean-Francois Vincent jean-francois.vinc...@atos.net Date: 2014-12-08T15:50:29Z Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM creation step --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation
On déc. 5, 2014, 5:55 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote: Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch. Axel Delahaye wrote: I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent Rohit Yadav wrote: Send it separetely, Github PR on github.com/apache/cloudstack (Github is more fun that ReviewBoard), I see you both have atos.net in email (assuming you're both colleagues). Once we've that PR we can close this review request. done, PR #55 - Axel --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/#review64022 --- On déc. 5, 2014, 5:56 après-midi, Jean-Francois Vincent wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/ --- (Updated déc. 5, 2014, 5:56 après-midi) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- VM creation user interface : added the Userdata field Diffs - client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties 8abe874 ui/index.jsp 4910b9f ui/scripts/instanceWizard.js c2d3030 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/diff/ Testing --- tested done on 4.2.1. This patch was adapted for last master branch. Thanks, Jean-Francois Vincent
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #761
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Review Request 28843: CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8053 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8053 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The break condition for the loop is absent, hence eventually the list may be containing less than two hosts, where was we need a cluster with more than two hosts (hence the list). Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_host_maintenance.py 7027469 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #762
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55#issuecomment-66272762 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014
All, The board report is due again. Below the draft report, please send me your suggestions, additions, basically any kind of feedback. Cheers, Hugo DESCRIPTION Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform. ISSUES None CURRENT ACTIVITY * The community is working on the next major release (4.5.0) of Apache CloudStack. The first release candidate is available already. * Ongoing efforts in fixing bugs and findings from static code analysis resulted in a number of bug fixes to existing branches. * Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11 2014. Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey is a CLI tool for interacting with Apache CloudStack and is distributed separate from Apache CloudStack * Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released Oct 23 2014. This maintenance release will be followed by a second maintenance release 4.4.2 in December. * The community enjoyed a very successful European CloudStack Collaboration Conference (CCCEU). CCCEU in Budapest. The new format including a full day single room track and poster sessions seemed to work out well. * The community is still struggling with way to improve quality and prevent master from breaking. Multiple efforts including improved automated testing and work flow enhancements are being executed and/or proposed. There is no clear consensus other than the generic agreement that the current situation leaves ample room for improvement. RELEASES Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released on Oct 23, 2014. Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11, 2014 COMMUNITY Including the following additions, CloudStack has 96 committers and 32 (+3) PMC members. New Committers: - New PMC Members: Ian Duffy (duffy)- Sep 29 Pierre-Luc Dion (pdion891) - Sep 29 Rajani Kuruturi (rajani) - Oct 16 The Apache CloudStack project remains a high volume community: dev@ msgs = Nov: 1322, Oct: 1054, Sep: 1421 users@ msgs = Nov: 670, Oct: 557, Sep: 481 issues@ msgs = Nov: 1933, Oct: 1011, Sep: 1671 commits@ msgs = Nov: 1039, Oct: 696, Sep: 826 marketing@ msgs = Nov: 70, Oct: 60, Sep:69 users-cn@ msgs = Nov: 120, Oct: 46, Sep: 61
Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?
Hi France, I'll try too go through them and see if I can fix them, everyone in the community is encouraged to help fix test. If they are already fixed, I can help with backporting them and testing them. I don't want to delay 4.3.2 release further because there is a security issue that will be shipped with 4.3.2 and we have not done any official ACS release to answer that, I think we should fix blockers or critical bugs for 4.3.2 and effort on testing it now. We'll keep working on these and other pending bugs, and if they don't make it to 4.3.2 we can always work on 4.3.3 etc. On Monday 08 December 2014 03:06 PM, France wrote: Hi Rohit, Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in time for 4.3.2 release: Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013 Failed to create a volume from snapshot: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014 Virtual Router only with DHCP should not have DNS service https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4675 Excessive use of LVM snapshots on XenServer, that leads to snapshot failure and unnecessary disk usage. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6060 Possibly this one too: Failed to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume 372 - Failure from sparse_dd: Fatal error: exception Invalid_argument(index out of bounds”): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8044?filter=-2 Some others, you have already back-ported. For that we thank you. Thank you, Regards, F. On 20 Nov 2014, at 10:15, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months. I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to the 4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any blocker/critical/major issue that you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to be fixed. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #89
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
setting db.properties files
Hi, I am dockering with cloudstack. I need to update the db.properties file to set the db password and host to something other than localhost. the host is actually in a env variable. I can do it with a dirty hack like this: sed -i s/db.root.password=/db.root.password=$MYSQL_ENV_MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD/ utils/conf/db.properties what's the best practice to change those db properties at runtime ? thx, -sebastien
Re: setting db.properties files
Hi Sebastien, Create and use a db.properties.override file in the same location (utils/conf), this file is by default not included in git (it's in .gitignore). Hope this helps. On Tuesday 09 December 2014 06:26 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: Hi, I am dockering with cloudstack. I need to update the db.properties file to set the db password and host to something other than localhost. the host is actually in a env variable. I can do it with a dirty hack like this: sed -i s/db.root.password=/db.root.password=$MYSQL_ENV_MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD/ utils/conf/db.properties what's the best practice to change those db properties at runtime ? thx, -sebastien -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
Hi everyone, In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014), but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance zones and it has worked for me so far. For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this thread. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #763
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
ACS 4.3 - Fail to restart VPC - Exception with Null pointer
Hello Folks, I have stopped and destroyed my vpc (in order to reprovision it after tweaking inside vm), but now i'm trying to restart my vpc (so trying to recreate my vpc instance vm), but here is the error i have : http://pastebin.com/fQixjbcF Thanks for your responses. Regards, Benoit Lair.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #764
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: ACS 4.3 - Fail to restart VPC - Exception with Null pointer
Hi Benoit, Does this happen with 4.3.1 or 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT (latest from 4.3)? When you say you stopped and destroyed VPC, do you mean the whole VPC or a VM in your VPC? How may I reproduce it on a clean ACS installation (I only have KVM/Xen)? On Tuesday 09 December 2014 07:37 PM, benoit lair wrote: Hello Folks, I have stopped and destroyed my vpc (in order to reprovision it after tweaking inside vm), but now i'm trying to restart my vpc (so trying to recreate my vpc instance vm), but here is the error i have : http://pastebin.com/fQixjbcF Thanks for your responses. Regards, Benoit Lair. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #90
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP
Yeah, that seems strange. I don't recall it working that way in the past. It uses the standard iptables DNAT, and I believe the same methods as static NAT to rewrite the destination ip. Do you see the same behavior with static NAT on routing incoming traffic to a particular VM? Just to make sure we're not confusing terms here, static NAT is a port forward for all ports, basically mapping IP2 in whole to an instance. I think you're referring to SNAT (source NAT) when you say outbound static NAT looks fine, but I'm not sure. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Marcus, static NAT (outound connections) works fine - when internal VM access internet, it's source address is replaced with the MAIN public IP of the VPC VR (call it IP1 in my example - x.x.x.x) - so all fine. Then I have additional public IPs to be able to do port forwarding... - when I do port forwarding on IP2 x.x.x.y (additional public IP on VR) to the internal IP on VM - the VR actually does some kind of proxying so to speak - so the source IP in the TCP/UDP packet that reach internal VM IP, appears to be the IP1 x.x.x.x (main public IP of the VR) instead the real remote IP of the client... Will check the scripts - but this is serious issue in my opinion. I understand proxying (haproxy) works like every proxy - so the behaviour for the proxy is expected. But this behaviour for the port forwarding is NOT normal at all... THanks
Re: [DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/09/2014 01:32 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: All, The board report is due again. Below the draft report, please send me your suggestions, additions, basically any kind of feedback. Cheers, Hugo DESCRIPTION Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform. ISSUES None CURRENT ACTIVITY * The community is working on the next major release (4.5.0) of Apache CloudStack. The first release candidate is available already. Shouldn't we add 4.3.2 and 4.4.2 here as well? * Ongoing efforts in fixing bugs and findings from static code analysis resulted in a number of bug fixes to existing branches. * Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11 2014. Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey is a CLI tool for interacting with Apache CloudStack and is distributed separate from Apache CloudStack * Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released Oct 23 2014. This maintenance release will be followed by a second maintenance release 4.4.2 in December. * The community enjoyed a very successful European CloudStack Collaboration Conference (CCCEU). CCCEU in Budapest. The new format including a full day single room track and poster sessions seemed to work out well. * The community is still struggling with way to improve quality and prevent master from breaking. Multiple efforts including improved automated testing and work flow enhancements are being executed and/or proposed. There is no clear consensus other than the generic agreement that the current situation leaves ample room for improvement. RELEASES Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released on Oct 23, 2014. Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11, 2014 COMMUNITY Including the following additions, CloudStack has 96 committers and 32 (+3) PMC members. New Committers: - New PMC Members: Ian Duffy (duffy)- Sep 29 Pierre-Luc Dion (pdion891) - Sep 29 Rajani Kuruturi (rajani) - Oct 16 The Apache CloudStack project remains a high volume community: dev@ msgs = Nov: 1322, Oct: 1054, Sep: 1421 users@ msgs = Nov: 670, Oct: 557, Sep: 481 issues@ msgs = Nov: 1933, Oct: 1011, Sep: 1671 commits@ msgs = Nov: 1039, Oct: 696, Sep: 826 marketing@ msgs = Nov: 70, Oct: 60, Sep:69 users-cn@ msgs = Nov: 120, Oct: 46, Sep: 61 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUhzgQAAoJEAGbWC3bPspC6M0P/1SYPwaS77FbqUpJSBE9peho /nifBP3RBQ8KarfTRuKej2qLNzZd4EKDfJ0BFpKmU2Tu8p2VXFT+jGhUbcB9f1TM tpT/iu2WLRk1Y2T88MZ25cKlaeSNCGDBptjnh+iKNEX1+wseiFdKNGZBe3S4hcCF kaGPBWqlvtv7Z9qatVBeyac7EE/rLDr0umU7rC+7kAVlComNxliyK54c60YcI7Ax O7ycKnA3fGfPjTZrg3amhhFBn+ZtRV7CbGJ7bdISjxqOfJRoFB2Bk2bmdDyKFkDg fG5lIWjDsVqp47vwZReH2ZsjxNx5DAuYv4tkTkfKzaOdB61uh7mbMqFSyZiYZwaS h5vbvvrgWlFlj0A7ZZp3Y1yunYkpFaUHv96nJ8RaQ26KACBIbnjjvL6NHbG7fEqI zNzDj/wCWHZMjIjYPG1ShvOtot7P80S4ysIQxMvytFwNIA/nI8vJdiKMgX/Kvf9H S1c/awlEGnf4RnM8QGOD4uJ45Zuq92MRU7xRR3xmmDA5ANltiiBfCExOH4xppdnI 4LvTrlJb6Z5u6opnQRY9YCGingotBtGJH1YolMYi1kIPEBdH8IMjICZEkzC4Flc6 xIuxj2lA8Ajj1VoLu4NiwQENjR8aY1iDuE89Bfz1D9+7aQyBnXv9nmnmM0Nep3G2 8b3QLlvN2TVoIKI8Nu0V =8jTt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/09/2014 02:25 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 I think CloudMonkey is not complex enough (that's a good thing!) to justify the need for multiple branches. Just tags on master should be sufficient I think. Wido +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUhzfwAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCIGkQAJB5BEdY8ggEUNknOt0k0aMH u+bq008ox5T3HOm9sdeeGS3oOJkPTH3Recwa7SKNnd1m0sS0D039YaQT0GUuOBxc QOPVJelR+blRzQO9x4nyI9wT2rftnKyR5GuQhwHg5Z73v9mqj1U8RIKu44rnRDOj kSlvR25sCxqgec1YKvQwi43bs9H/VBt+i9OnSVMjBFGRaGquM2jTE5SAQr5pG3NA tAodLFYTEtbDeAOtOJ/Cn9hnME62exacyuhatZsbC2zpaQcc2Z7mLwyzjaVrDibl BMZNVBONiA7HKRvQ7oqXPru4x0vQD+4nmlLxTd4wGzAgfqIVEBd1OxWGa2QnDWir b+iS2uq9XrWwo7ijwcxZwOG1GBSUlGUWETKM3GHcv5LHmtExIyR0ojcT9sc0UiYr zig8kgsSjj7q2K/5TtepNqdtmbOH2ni+3tQAADAvFhDEOxIa1cx3Lb4aXQRUCpbQ PiIlVi9Ry2hfYsJEBce+XdtAiD8IERYbnMSLfKDVlvny8Ce+5AozKaccF2rAa5iv B9qgYEJtPXoLC15KEkPd+t9WV7UPLxvCQxDic3UHSC1Fx6I6E/xCscgCPp5e2Vk0 A3iMKgQLXbFcV/iYlzF2GpYgKowEH1P3K7F+YfyG785sdCHqzCPvq2T/0biCt+Ye EZGhYpyV0fetC0QTD3ZW =gzBp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: about to MERGE
I have a quick question. Is H a Daan-ism for Hi? :) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, I had a contribution from colleague on master that I cherry-picked on 4.4 and 4.5. I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute. please alert me if this is inconvenient. -- Daan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
RE: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1 as long as CloudMonkey remains backwards compatible with older CloudStack releases, so that we don't have to preserve old monkeys to talk to old stacks. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 09 December 2014 13:26 To: dev Subject: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Review Request 28843: CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/#review64402 --- Ship it! - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8053 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8053 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The break condition for the loop is absent, hence eventually the list may be containing less than two hosts, where was we need a cluster with more than two hosts (hence the list). Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_host_maintenance.py 7027469 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 28843: CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/#review64403 --- pushed to master and 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 11:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8053 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8053 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The break condition for the loop is absent, hence eventually the list may be containing less than two hosts, where was we need a cluster with more than two hosts (hence the list). Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_host_maintenance.py 7027469 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28843/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 28840: CLOUDSTACK-8049: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/#review64404 --- Ship it! pushed to master and 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 9, 2014, 7:08 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2014, 7:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8049 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8049 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Resize volume test cases can't be run on Simulator, hence tagging them as required_hardware=True Diffs - test/integration/component/test_ps_resize_volume.py 5df4a62 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/diff/ Testing --- N/A Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 that's what we do in libcloud. You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have to build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master. But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the previous minor. so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
Fantastic work Rohit! :) I tested with the dev branch of devcloud4 binary installation basic [1]. Everything worked without issue, brought up a new ubuntu vm based of the openvm.eu templates [2]. Template came up without issue, console worked, password and hostname were successfully set. Created SG group rules for HTTP and SSH. Both worked as expected. [1] https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/dev/binary-installation-basic [2] http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/ubuntu/vanilla/jenkins/ On 9 December 2014 at 13:47, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi everyone, In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014), but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance zones and it has worked for me so far. For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this thread. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CloudStack Quality Process
Based on Doodle. Meeting is schedule for Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC. freenode: #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM. Regards, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those of you that are doing to come up with some better practices for the community to adopt! On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Agreed -Original Message- From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process I am speaking as a committer who has limited insight into the 'correct' way to do this via Apache (so be gentle). :) I like the idea of a wiki page to help get everyone on the same page and to track the consensus as we move forward... I also agree that it is hard to come to a consensus on the list because it is really hard to have a constructive conversation on here in a timely manner where the different voices can be heard. I think it would be interesting to schedule sessions/meetings on the list so any interested party can join. These sessions/meetings would happen in a format like IRC where the transcript of the session can be later posted to the list as well as a summary of the transcript so it can be reviewed by any member who could not make the meeting. This way we keep all of the actual conversation in the list, but we also make it easier to actually have a 'conversation' at the same time. It is hard to beat real time when working through this sort of stuff. Does this make sense to others? Thoughts? Will *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Wearing my PMC hat and with past experience on these discussions we have not made much progress on mailing list despite agreeing on the goals and have locked horns. One possibility after reading Chip's email and concerns I see is that, we create a wiki outlining the problem space, possible solution(s) and their specific pros and cons and have people collaborate. Once a general consensus is there and wiki is stable we can bring it back to the mailing list for final approval. This is open as well as requires participant a higher degree of commitment to collaborate and will be more structured. Thanks Animesh On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Steve, (Speaking with my PMC hat on, but not as someone that has the time to help with this process) I love the idea of moving forward with resolving some of the quality process / tooling / etc... challenges that we face as a project and community. I also love the idea that companies getting commercial value from this project are talking (as companies) about how to best support the project through either directing their employees to work on this problem, allowing those interested the time to do so, and / or offering (as Citrix did) required hardware/software resources to make improvements for the common good. Importantly, I like that the companies involved are mutually agreeing that this is for the common good. That said, I have a concern about the outline below, specifically in how the definition of approach and eventual execution are handled. The proposal of taking this off-list until there is a proposal to ratify is what I'd like to see changed. I would fully expect that a fleshed out proposal hitting the list would be met with more discussion than you would like (and perhaps even met with frustration). What has worked well for us in the past, where there is a need to have those interested in doing work to be able to focus on that work, has been to start with a call for interested parties (as you did). Then, using a combination of threads on this list and live meetings, make progress on defining the requirements and approach incrementally. Execution of any work should similarly be open and shared on this list. Throughout that process, allowing comments and openings for participants are critical. One of the things we learned about using live meetings to speed up the
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and 4.3.2) at the same time. I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi everyone, In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014), but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance zones and it has worked for me so far. For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this thread. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
Actually, it looks like we're considering the release of 4.4.2 in December along with 4.5.0 and 4.3.2. We definitely should make sure we give people sufficient time to test RCs and not run VOTE threads simultaneously. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and 4.3.2) at the same time. I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi everyone, In last couple of weeks 103 issues were fixed on 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 release: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.3/CHANGES.md I want to kick start release process for 4.3.2 next week (15 Dec 2014), but before that let's test 4.3 branch and fix any blockers and critical issues. I'll meanwhile try to fix other pending issues till the end of this week. I've tested 4.3 branch with KVM in both basic and advance zones and it has worked for me so far. For the purpose of involving users in the testing process I've build a noredist rpm/deb repository using SHA 32adae4 from 4.3 branch. Please use the following repository for testing 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing If you find any blocker or critical issues please report them on this thread. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014
Hi, On 09-Dec-2014, at 11:27 pm, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: Shouldn't we add 4.3.2 and 4.4.2 here as well? 4.4.2 is already released so we can add that but 4.3.2 is not yet released. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
Hi Mike, 4.4.2 is already released. On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and 4.3.2) at the same time. I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time. I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an upcoming cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives, automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season - but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s good to see so many initiatives. I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing community; - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing release(s) - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging) - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix release and requires less bandwidth - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of changes and a new systemvmtemplate I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for users and people in general to participate without building from source (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way). Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #765
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
I see it listed on the website now. Thanks :) On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, 4.4.2 is already released. On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:; wrote: I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and 4.3.2) at the same time. I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time. I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an upcoming cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives, automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season - but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s good to see so many initiatives. I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing community; - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing release(s) - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging) - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix release and requires less bandwidth - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of changes and a new systemvmtemplate I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for users and people in general to participate without building from source (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way). Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:; Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
Yeah, I agree 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing. What's not clear to me is how much coverage we currently have for that release and how much of it is automated. A lot of fixes went into it and that's awesome, but that does increase the probability that something here or there was broken. On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I see it listed on the website now. Thanks :) On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com'); wrote: Hi Mike, 4.4.2 is already released. On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and 4.3.2) at the same time. I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time. I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an upcoming cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives, automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season - but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s good to see so many initiatives. I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing community; - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing release(s) - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging) - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix release and requires less bandwidth - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of changes and a new systemvmtemplate I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for users and people in general to participate without building from source (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way). Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com'); o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
CloudStack 4.4.1 Upgrade - View Console Not Working (Any Ideas)?
Hello, We upgraded Cloud Stack from 4.2 to 4.4.1 to address the Depreciation of realhostip.com. The installation was successful, and everything went smoothly. Unfortunately, the view console link is still not working. We disabled SSL completely by setting secstorage.encrypt.copy to false, and changing consoleproxy.url.domain to empty. It's a non production system, and SSL isn't required. This is the URL that is being called from CloudStack now: (Before I got the Apache page, telling me realhostip was deprecated and what to do) http://9.72.78.1:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149d This is what is returned in the management console log. Does anyone have any ideas what else needs to be configured, or changed? I've been reading everything I can on Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in, to try and resolve it. Any ideas, hints, or comments is greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for reviewing. Casey Cantwell 2014-12-09 11:20:42,001 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80) ===START=== 9.72.44.101 -- GET command=listVirtualMachinesid=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149dresponse=jsonsessionkey=Sph11NRl%2B9FD9ToP4nk5h8E%2FXGk%3D_=1418152841990 2014-12-09 11:20:42,005 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80 ctx-9ea2576d) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-09 11:20:42,009 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80 ctx-9ea2576d) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-09 11:20:42,030 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-8:ctx-bc45be80 ctx-9ea2576d) ===END=== 9.72.44.101 -- GET command=listVirtualMachinesid=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149dresponse=jsonsessionkey=Sph11NRl%2B9FD9ToP4nk5h8E%2FXGk%3D_=1418152841990 2014-12-09 11:20:42, 2014-12-05 11:31:16,489 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79) ===START=== 9.72.44.101 -- GET command=listVirtualMachinesid=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149dresponse=jsonsessionkey=J%2BzoAkWX%2B1TLv%2BjfbMYg0QAOLoA%3D_=1417807876551 2014-12-05 11:31:16,493 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79 ctx-594e7854) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-05 11:31:16,496 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79 ctx-594e7854) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-05 11:31:16,518 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:ctx-f6deaa79 ctx-594e7854) ===END=== 9.72.44.101 -- GET command=listVirtualMachinesid=ade1e441-5460-4a33-bc73-595baf19149dresponse=jsonsessionkey=J%2BzoAkWX%2B1TLv%2BjfbMYg0QAOLoA%3D_=1417807876551
Re: about to MERGE
Hi would be transcribed in Dutch as haai, which means shark. leaving out the I (j-sound) would be transcribed as H (h-aa). aso it is less typing, way less. And as I hate typing a lot I really owe you the short answer; yes On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I have a quick question. Is H a Daan-ism for Hi? :) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, I had a contribution from colleague on master that I cherry-picked on 4.4 and 4.5. I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute. please alert me if this is inconvenient. -- Daan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- Daan
Re: [DRAFT] Board report Q4 2014
CVE isn't mentioned and probably should be. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@apache.org wrote: All, The board report is due again. Below the draft report, please send me your suggestions, additions, basically any kind of feedback. Cheers, Hugo DESCRIPTION Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform. ISSUES None CURRENT ACTIVITY * The community is working on the next major release (4.5.0) of Apache CloudStack. The first release candidate is available already. * Ongoing efforts in fixing bugs and findings from static code analysis resulted in a number of bug fixes to existing branches. * Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11 2014. Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey is a CLI tool for interacting with Apache CloudStack and is distributed separate from Apache CloudStack * Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released Oct 23 2014. This maintenance release will be followed by a second maintenance release 4.4.2 in December. * The community enjoyed a very successful European CloudStack Collaboration Conference (CCCEU). CCCEU in Budapest. The new format including a full day single room track and poster sessions seemed to work out well. * The community is still struggling with way to improve quality and prevent master from breaking. Multiple efforts including improved automated testing and work flow enhancements are being executed and/or proposed. There is no clear consensus other than the generic agreement that the current situation leaves ample room for improvement. RELEASES Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 was released on Oct 23, 2014. Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 was released on Nov 11, 2014 COMMUNITY Including the following additions, CloudStack has 96 committers and 32 (+3) PMC members. New Committers: - New PMC Members: Ian Duffy (duffy)- Sep 29 Pierre-Luc Dion (pdion891) - Sep 29 Rajani Kuruturi (rajani) - Oct 16 The Apache CloudStack project remains a high volume community: dev@ msgs = Nov: 1322, Oct: 1054, Sep: 1421 users@ msgs = Nov: 670, Oct: 557, Sep: 481 issues@ msgs = Nov: 1933, Oct: 1011, Sep: 1671 commits@ msgs = Nov: 1039, Oct: 696, Sep: 826 marketing@ msgs = Nov: 70, Oct: 60, Sep:69 users-cn@ msgs = Nov: 120, Oct: 46, Sep: 61
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #766
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: about to MERGE
Sounds good! :) On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi would be transcribed in Dutch as haai, which means shark. leaving out the I (j-sound) would be transcribed as H (h-aa). aso it is less typing, way less. And as I hate typing a lot I really owe you the short answer; yes On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:; wrote: I have a quick question. Is H a Daan-ism for Hi? :) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: H, I had a contribution from colleague on master that I cherry-picked on 4.4 and 4.5. I will merge 4.5 -s recursive -X ours in a few minute. please alert me if this is inconvenient. -- Daan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:; o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- Daan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1, it makes sense for cloudmonkey :) On 9 December 2014 at 22:51, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 that's what we do in libcloud. You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have to build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master. But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the previous minor. so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Sent from Windows Phone
Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1 On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: +1 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:; wrote: Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:; Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Sent from Windows Phone -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add the Userdata setting to the UI on VM ...
just wandering whether checking selected network supported userdata or not On Dec 9, 2014 8:07 PM, asfgit g...@git.apache.org wrote: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/55 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #767
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-6424) Citrix Xenserver 6.2 Support
Hi, neo currently we are using acs 4.2.1 ship with xenserver 6.2.0 without service pack. Till now works pretty well. --- Thanks, Yitao(依涛 姜) jiangyt.github.io On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:44 PM, neo (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: neo created CLOUDSTACK-6424: --- Summary: Citrix Xenserver 6.2 Support Key: CLOUDSTACK-6424 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6424 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Hypervisor Controller Affects Versions: 4.2.0 Environment: Citrix Xenserver 6.2, Cloudstack 4.2.1 Reporter: neo Hi, I'm having issue configuring Cloudstack, later on reading release note found Citrix XenServer 6.2 is not supported with cloudstack 4.2.1 Cloudstack 4.2.1 Release Note - https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.1/html/Release_Notes/supported-os.html#supported-hv but somewhere on bug, i have found its supported with cloudstack 4.2 even citrix updated this for Cloudplatform where they are saying XenServer 6.2 is suported with Cloudplatform 4.2.1 and later http://support.citrix.com/cms/kc/cloud-troubleshooting/cloudplatform-compatibility-matrix/ Its pretty confusing now, i'm experiencing some issue in cloudstack deployment which i think because of XenServer 6.2 support. Please confirm whether its supported or not and also update release note, release note really helps. Thanks -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1, keep it simple On 10-Dec-2014, at 4:21 am, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. This way we will have: - one main working branch (master) - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers - master is aimed to remain stable - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; +1 approve +0 no opinion -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 that's what we do in libcloud. You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have to build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master. But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the previous minor. so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #768
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix. Here are the details. 1. Please join my meeting. https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone. United States: +1 (213) 493-0008 Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358 Australia: +61 2 9091 7603 Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061 Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716 Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305 Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388 Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372 Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281 Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380 Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146 China (toll-free): 4008 866154 Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919 Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58 Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473 Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773 France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052 France: +33 (0) 170 950 590 Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230 Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300 Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 263 Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006 Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020 Italy (toll-free): 800 792289 Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65 Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200 Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178 Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759 New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055 Norway: +47 21 04 30 59 Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253 Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593 Spain: +34 931 76 1534 Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545 Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691 Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452 Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89 Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846 Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209 United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 32 148 Access Code: 285-394-368 Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting Meeting ID: 285-394-368 GoToMeeting® Online Meetings Made Easy® Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Based on Doodle. Meeting is schedule for Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC. freenode: #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM. Regards, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those of you that are doing to come up with some better practices for the community to adopt! On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Agreed -Original Message- From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process I am speaking as a committer who has limited insight into the 'correct' way to do this via Apache (so be gentle). :) I like the idea of a wiki page to help get everyone on the same page and to track the consensus as we move forward... I also agree that it is hard to come to a consensus on the list because it is really hard to have a constructive conversation on here in a timely manner where the different voices can be heard. I think it would be interesting to schedule sessions/meetings on the list so any interested party can join. These sessions/meetings would happen in a format like IRC where the transcript of the session can be later posted to the list as well
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others can view it if they are not able to attend (or only become interested after the first couple meetings and wants to catch up)? Will On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix. Here are the details. 1. Please join my meeting. https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone. United States: +1 (213) 493-0008 Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358 Australia: +61 2 9091 7603 Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061 Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716 Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305 Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388 Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372 Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281 Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380 Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146 China (toll-free): 4008 866154 Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919 Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58 Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473 Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773 France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052 France: +33 (0) 170 950 590 Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230 Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300 Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 263 Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006 Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020 Italy (toll-free): 800 792289 Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65 Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200 Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178 Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759 New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055 Norway: +47 21 04 30 59 Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253 Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593 Spain: +34 931 76 1534 Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545 Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691 Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452 Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89 Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846 Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209 United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 32 148 Access Code: 285-394-368 Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting Meeting ID: 285-394-368 GoToMeeting® Online Meetings Made Easy® Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Based on Doodle. Meeting is schedule for Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC. freenode: #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM. Regards, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those of you that are doing to come up with some better practices for the community to adopt! On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Agreed -Original Message- From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process I am speaking as a committer who has limited insight into the 'correct' way to do this via Apache (so be gentle). :) I like the idea of a wiki page to help get everyone on the same page and to track the consensus as we move forward... I also agree that it is hard to come to a consensus on the list because it is
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
In would love to be a part of the meeting as a user just to be a fly on the wall. My datacenter that I am contracted to build a public cloud is relying on me to keep up to date with the project but tomorrow I am scheduled to do a wireless relay shot of 18miles and will miss the meeting. Not a big deal if the notes are taken or recorded and I will be able to review them. Just my 2 cents -Original Message- From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:59 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson (steve.wil...@citrix.com) Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others can view it if they are not able to attend (or only become interested after the first couple meetings and wants to catch up)? Will On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix. Here are the details. 1. Please join my meeting. https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone. United States: +1 (213) 493-0008 Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358 Australia: +61 2 9091 7603 Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061 Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716 Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305 Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388 Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372 Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281 Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380 Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146 China (toll-free): 4008 866154 Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919 Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58 Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473 Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773 France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052 France: +33 (0) 170 950 590 Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230 Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300 Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 263 Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006 Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020 Italy (toll-free): 800 792289 Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65 Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200 Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178 Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759 New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055 Norway: +47 21 04 30 59 Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253 Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593 Spain: +34 931 76 1534 Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545 Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691 Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452 Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89 Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846 Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209 United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 32 148 Access Code: 285-394-368 Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting Meeting ID: 285-394-368 GoToMeeting® Online Meetings Made Easy® Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Based on Doodle. Meeting is schedule for Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC. freenode: #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM. Regards, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those of you that are doing to come up with some better practices for the community to adopt! On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Agreed -Original
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
Yes I am planning to record the GTM -Original Message- From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:59 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others can view it if they are not able to attend (or only become interested after the first couple meetings and wants to catch up)? Will On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix. Here are the details. 1. Please join my meeting. https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone. United States: +1 (213) 493-0008 Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800 191 358 Australia: +61 2 9091 7603 Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061 Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716 Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305 Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800 81388 Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372 Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777 3281 Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380 Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146 China (toll-free): 4008 866154 Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free): 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919 Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58 Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473 Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773 France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052 France: +33 (0) 170 950 590 Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230 Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300 Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818 263 Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006 Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020 Italy (toll-free): 800 792289 Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65 Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200 Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free): 800 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178 Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759 New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055 Norway: +47 21 04 30 59 Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253 Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593 Spain: +34 931 76 1534 Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545 Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691 Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452 Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89 Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846 Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800 4488 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168 0209 United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120 32 148 Access Code: 285-394-368 Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting Meeting ID: 285-394-368 GoToMeeting® Online Meetings Made Easy® Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Based on Doodle. Meeting is schedule for Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC. freenode: #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM. Regards, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those of you that are doing to come up with some better practices for the community to adopt! On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Agreed -Original Message- From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Steve Wilson Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5-simulator #111
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/111/changes Changes: [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-8030: Updated router to come up egress default ALLOW -- [...truncated 1143 lines...] Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 2 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Compiling 662 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Compiling 2 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DatabaseAccessObjectTest Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.292 sec Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DbUpgradeUtilsTest Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.269 sec Results : Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/jobs/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/jobs (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Compiling 33 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/jobs/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 4 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/jobs/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Surefire report directory:
Re: [TESTING] CloudStack 4.3.2 testing
Following test worked fine on 4.3 adv zone setup with Xen 6.2: Register template VM creation Multiple primary storages Storage tagging VM, Volume snapshots Volume from snapshot VPC In dev setup the storage is configured as local storage by default, since I was using shared storage and was not aware of this, it took some time to figure it out. Other than that 4.3 worked pretty well. Though if we have any type of automation configured on it, it will be nice to run regression tests and know publish the result. My thought will be to get this release (4.3.2) out of the door instead of delaying it past 4.5, 4.5 testing is going to take time as it may require more bug fixing-testing iterations than 4.3.2. As of now 4.3.2 looks promising. Abhinandan Prateek M +919701199011 abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 10-Dec-2014, at 3:09 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, I agree 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing. What's not clear to me is how much coverage we currently have for that release and how much of it is automated. A lot of fixes went into it and that's awesome, but that does increase the probability that something here or there was broken. On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I see it listed on the website now. Thanks :) On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com'); wrote: Hi Mike, 4.4.2 is already released. On 10-Dec-2014, at 1:36 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I wonder perhaps if it will be difficult for us to test two RCs (4.5.0 and 4.3.2) at the same time. I expect the two VOTE threads will overlap and people might not have enough bandwidth to devote to testing both at approximately the same time. I understand your concern, in fact both these things including an upcoming cloudmonkey voting process, quality discussion initiatives, automation/testing efforts are all happening around the holiday season - but this simply shows that we’ve a great and diverse community, and it’s good to see so many initiatives. I think it’s certainly do-able and here’s how we grow our testing community; - include users@, users-cn@ getting more people to help testing release(s) - built and share a deb/rpm repository so testing upgrades and installs along with ACS is easier for everyone (everyone is welcome to build from source but I think Jenkins is still a better tool for building/packaging) - 4.3.2 mainly requires regression testing efforts since it’s a bugfix release and requires less bandwidth - 4.5.0 will require a lot of functional testing, (new) component testing and regression testing as it is a major release with new features, a lot of changes and a new systemvmtemplate I’ll also build and share deb/rpm repository for 4.5.0 as soon as the RC is out and as part of our release process we can do that so it’s easier for users and people in general to participate without building from source (I’m not suggesting to discourage building from source in any way). Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com'); o:
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #769
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Review Request 28891: CLOUDSTACK-8055: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28891/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8055 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8055 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test cases try to download template/iso. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_ss_domain_limits.py 998bb8b test/integration/component/test_ss_limits.py 4d6efc4 test/integration/component/test_ss_max_limits.py 49a1e4f test/integration/component/test_ss_project_limits.py 0668f07 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28891/diff/ Testing --- N/A Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #770
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
hi prasanth, In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter qos properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM. Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth) through xencenter or commandline process in http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html , if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it will changed to 25Mb/s. waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: From the xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS settings) for that particular vm . -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling. Recent reply from Vadim: http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote: Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar. -- Andrija Panić
