[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix the bug when build apidoc under windo...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/114#issuecomment-85469871 this is the commit https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/52ffccff5f1436dd5762fcc90050aadaf82eedad --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Fwd: [GSOC] Setting up multiple devcloud host in cloudstack dev environment
Tilak, when you run the following command: python -m marvin.deployDataCenter -i /path/to/GSoC-2014/repo/advanced/advanced.json you replace /path/to/GSoC-2014/repo by a valid one right? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: I couldnt deploy the zone pod cluster successfully hence there were no hosts and I couldnt launch a VM. Later what I did was manually create zone pod cluster and added the host and storage through the UI and it was successfull. The system vms came up nicely. But it gave me connection timed out when I tried to view the console of the CPVM or SSVM. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Will Stevens williamstev...@gmail.com wrote: Can you launch a VM through the CS ui? On Mar 23, 2015 9:14 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Will, yeah cloudstack management is running fine...I can open 127.0.0.1:8080/client on my browser...And there are two vms running..xenserver : I can ssh into it on port and management : i can ssh into it on port 2200. I configured the networking in virtual box under preferences/network/vboxnet0 192.168.56.1 and dhcp disabled...but there is nothing under preferences/network/NAT in the virtualbox...do I have to configure something there?? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Will Stevens williamstev...@gmail.com wrote: Is the cloudstack up and working? Did you check in virtual box if the box(s?) are up? If so can you check the logs? It seems like you are not getting your networking configured because the VM seems to come up but there is no connection. Is the network reported correct? Nat and host only is right? I think that is what I read. Ws On Mar 23, 2015 8:54 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:12 AM Subject: Re: [GSOC] Setting up multiple devcloud host in cloudstack dev environment To: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com I just tried deploying on 4.3 branch using binary directory on 4.3 branch https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/master/basic and followed the instructions given here https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/blob/master/basic/README.md still I am getting the same error... :/ Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 162, in _run_module_as_main __main__, fname, loader, pkg_name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 72, in _run_code exec code in run_globals File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 572, in module deploy.deploy() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 554, in deploy self.loadCfg() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 516, in loadCfg mgtDetails.apiKey, mgtDetails.securityKey = self.registerApiKey() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 485, in registerApiKey listuserRes = self.testClient.getApiClient().listUsers(listuser) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudstackAPIClient.py, line 527, in listUsers response = self.connection.marvinRequest(command, response_type=response, method=method) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py, line 272, in marvinRequest response = jsonHelper.getResultObj(response.json(), response_type) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/requests/models.py, line 802, in json return json.loads(self.text, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/__init__.py, line 413, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/decoder.py, line 402, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/decoder.py, line 420, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError(No JSON object could be decoded, s, idx) simplejson.decoder.JSONDecodeError: No JSON object could be decoded: line 1 column 0 (char 0) I cant figure out if the issue is in python or simplejson so I reinstalled both but I am still stuck at the same stage On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I tried the binary-installation-basic one but ended up getting the errors I posted above. I followed up trying the not binary advanced as you are provisioning. Doing vagrant up setup xenserver and management
vm's taskmgr.exe only show cpu core num 2
Hello， I'm working on 4.4.2 cloudstack + vmware， vcenter 5.5 and Esxi 5.5. I'm facing a problem when i create a VM with win7 by iso. My vm configure is CPU Cores num 8 and 16G Memory and ISO file version is en_windows_7_ultimate_x64_dvd_x15-66043.iso. But my vm's taskmgr.exe only show cpu core num 2. How shoud I sovle the problem? Thanks. w...@landhightech.com
[VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate 4.4-RC20150324T1321
Hi All, (please note that the last release candidate did not get enough attention to make quorum) I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150324T1321 Commit: 483490534a8a091c7af7c61d1eaf5c0192f646d9 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.4.3 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3 PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: remove stale project cloud-systemvm
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/126#issuecomment-85479293 good point, will have to check that, thanks On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Rohit Yadav notificati...@github.com wrote: @DaanHoogland https://github.com/DaanHoogland just want to confirm if we are in anyway using those files in systemvm.iso generation or other places? â Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/126#issuecomment-85455210. -- Daan --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [DOCKER] cloudstack organisation
some addition inline: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I've played a little with Docker over the weekend, here are some thought and I'd like to have some input from community around this, 1. simulator: I'v create a Jenkins[1] job that build a simulator container an push it to the docker org: apachecloudstack [2]. It is only done for master branch at the moment and the image is fairly big, ~2GB, using Sebastien's Dockerfile. Cool. And yes the image is big, we can modify the Dockerfile to remove some maven stuff and make it smaller. Maybe even just run the jar like Ian has done for devcloud. This will be perform for other branches but based on commit instead of daily, probably. 2. cloudstack-management + database As the current simulator image contain MySQL, Maven, CloudStack git repo,.. it's quite big and not the Docker way, IMO. Correct. I just did it for devs…this is not meant for any type of prod This should be clear that it is not for prod since the DB would have been pre-installed So I'd like to see how it would make sense provide two containers instead of one: 1. cloudstack-database: mysql database with the initialized DB's (cloud, cloud_usage)... 2. cloudstack-management: pre installed cloudstack-management server including tomcat dependencies,... 3. cloudstack-usage: pre installed cloudstack-usage You can create a mgt server image and then link it to two or one mysql containers. the mgt server image can be setup with the packages. I ran into problems with IP tables etc. since our setup scripts are not meant for containers. I've experience this too, the container would be prepared without cloudstack-setup-management as it expect to modify firewall which is not available into container. This imply that build of those containers would be done thru Jenkins for the most part and use of Dockerfile might be difficult, which wouldn't allow to use dockers automatic builds. you could have dockerfiles and an auto build in docker hub. Just use the build trigger in docker hub to setup a hook in the jenkins job that builds the latest packages. The way I'm seeing things, because the DB would pre-initiated and into a separate container, I would not use dockerfile to build it, unless there is a way to create link at build, this is to provide the smallest container as possible. Also, I would use package (RPM,deb) to install cloudstack-management so it will enforce the test/validation of packaging, and would make containers more close to prod like deployement. You could put the dockerfile in /tools or something Good Idea I'll place Dockerfiles into /tools/docker [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator-docker/ [2] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/apachecloudstack/ On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Look like some work as been done to have a Dockerfile in our repo which build a CloudStack container easily. I'm curious to know if one of us own the cloudstack organisation and if so, if it would make sense to start to have our own automated build of container for CloudStack. I would easily see 2 build job for two containers: cloudstack-management and cloudstack-simulator. we could easily build a nightly build of master and offer latest GA releases. Look like it would be easy to automate builds and the simulator container could be use for the CI as it is for the fast-simulator jenkins tasks. any thought? +1, I committed the Dockerfile. But yes we should have a cloudstack organization in docker hub and setup automated builds. Ideally we can also setup a drone.io instance to do some continuous deployment…but this ties with the overalll jenkins/testing infra that we really need to get cleaned up and organized. -sebastuen
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hello, Does anyone have an idea when the 4.5.1 is going to be out including the packaged versions? It has been a while since the unfortunate, but well spotted, release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes shortly. Cheers Andrei - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 (+ users) Hi all, I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ 4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ (If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM templates). Happy testing! On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote: I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank spots. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are
Re: [DOCKER] cloudstack organisation
On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I've played a little with Docker over the weekend, here are some thought and I'd like to have some input from community around this, 1. simulator: I'v create a Jenkins[1] job that build a simulator container an push it to the docker org: apachecloudstack [2]. It is only done for master branch at the moment and the image is fairly big, ~2GB, using Sebastien's Dockerfile. Cool. And yes the image is big, we can modify the Dockerfile to remove some maven stuff and make it smaller. Maybe even just run the jar like Ian has done for devcloud. This will be perform for other branches but based on commit instead of daily, probably. 2. cloudstack-management + database As the current simulator image contain MySQL, Maven, CloudStack git repo,.. it's quite big and not the Docker way, IMO. Correct. I just did it for devs…this is not meant for any type of prod So I'd like to see how it would make sense provide two containers instead of one: 1. cloudstack-database: mysql database with the initialized DB's (cloud, cloud_usage)... 2. cloudstack-management: pre installed cloudstack-management server including tomcat dependencies,... 3. cloudstack-usage: pre installed cloudstack-usage You can create a mgt server image and then link it to two or one mysql containers. the mgt server image can be setup with the packages. I ran into problems with IP tables etc. since our setup scripts are not meant for containers. This imply that build of those containers would be done thru Jenkins for the most part and use of Dockerfile might be difficult, which wouldn't allow to use dockers automatic builds. you could have dockerfiles and an auto build in docker hub. Just use the build trigger in docker hub to setup a hook in the jenkins job that builds the latest packages. You could put the dockerfile in /tools or something [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator-docker/ [2] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/apachecloudstack/ On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Look like some work as been done to have a Dockerfile in our repo which build a CloudStack container easily. I'm curious to know if one of us own the cloudstack organisation and if so, if it would make sense to start to have our own automated build of container for CloudStack. I would easily see 2 build job for two containers: cloudstack-management and cloudstack-simulator. we could easily build a nightly build of master and offer latest GA releases. Look like it would be easy to automate builds and the simulator container could be use for the CI as it is for the fast-simulator jenkins tasks. any thought? +1, I committed the Dockerfile. But yes we should have a cloudstack organization in docker hub and setup automated builds. Ideally we can also setup a drone.io instance to do some continuous deployment…but this ties with the overalll jenkins/testing infra that we really need to get cleaned up and organized. -sebastuen
Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py
On March 24, 2015, 11:59 a.m., Sowmya Krishnan wrote: Ship It! Sowmya Krishnan wrote: Pushed to master: 5f3f20a79ce658077dd527f390cabd5fa29814f2 Please use GitHub pull request in future. Thanks. Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: ead41f9215546d38d29023e44fde7ec6b946dc9d Parents: 52ffccf Author: Abhinav Roy abhinav@citrix.com Authored: Tue Mar 24 14:07:57 2015 +0530 Committer: Sowmya Krishnan sowmya.krish...@apache.org Committed: Tue Mar 24 17:46:22 2015 +0530 Please mark review as Submitted - Sowmya --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#review77549 --- On March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m., abhinav roy wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/ --- (Updated March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This Patch has following changes : 1. A new script to test host status after enabling/disabling of Pods, Clusters, Zones or by managing/unmanaging of clusters etc. 2. update Modules added for Pod, Zone, cluster classes in base.py Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 5ca1bc2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/diff/ Testing --- Disable the host and it's cluster, ... === TestName: test_01_op_host_capacity_disable_cluster | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's pod, ... === TestName: test_02_op_host_capacity_disable_pod | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's zone, ... === TestName: test_03_op_host_capacity_disable_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy
Re: [DOCKER] cloudstack organisation
I've played a little with Docker over the weekend, here are some thought and I'd like to have some input from community around this, 1. simulator: I'v create a Jenkins[1] job that build a simulator container an push it to the docker org: apachecloudstack [2]. It is only done for master branch at the moment and the image is fairly big, ~2GB, using Sebastien's Dockerfile. This will be perform for other branches but based on commit instead of daily, probably. 2. cloudstack-management + database As the current simulator image contain MySQL, Maven, CloudStack git repo,.. it's quite big and not the Docker way, IMO. So I'd like to see how it would make sense provide two containers instead of one: 1. cloudstack-database: mysql database with the initialized DB's (cloud, cloud_usage)... 2. cloudstack-management: pre installed cloudstack-management server including tomcat dependencies,... 3. cloudstack-usage: pre installed cloudstack-usage This imply that build of those containers would be done thru Jenkins for the most part and use of Dockerfile might be difficult, which wouldn't allow to use dockers automatic builds. [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator-docker/ [2] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/apachecloudstack/ On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Look like some work as been done to have a Dockerfile in our repo which build a CloudStack container easily. I'm curious to know if one of us own the cloudstack organisation and if so, if it would make sense to start to have our own automated build of container for CloudStack. I would easily see 2 build job for two containers: cloudstack-management and cloudstack-simulator. we could easily build a nightly build of master and offer latest GA releases. Look like it would be easy to automate builds and the simulator container could be use for the CI as it is for the fast-simulator jenkins tasks. any thought? +1, I committed the Dockerfile. But yes we should have a cloudstack organization in docker hub and setup automated builds. Ideally we can also setup a drone.io instance to do some continuous deployment…but this ties with the overalll jenkins/testing infra that we really need to get cleaned up and organized. -sebastuen
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4 for centos7
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/125 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8251: Adding automation test c...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/128#issuecomment-85455853 LGTM! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: 4.4 HEAD broken
fyi: I pulled 4.4 on my private computer and the snmp tests don't fail there. It seems to have to do with my hostname and it resolving: no issue, sorry On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Failed tests: appendTest(org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpTrapAppenderTest): error snmpHelper list size not as expected expected:0 but was:2 the test class wasn't touched this or last year. Anybody touched snmp functionality? -- Daan -- Daan
Re: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP
Great proposals Sebastien! Let's AWSAPI, improve code, remove dead code, cleanup JIRA/RB cleanup and move to Github PR. I hope we’ll have a better UIs for ACS users soon! Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8278: Usage test path - Correc...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/127 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix the bug when build apidoc under windo...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/114#issuecomment-85466253 @jiangyt I'm pushing a fix that I believe should work on Cygwin, please test that using master and let me know here or on dev ML. The fix at least won't break on Linux/Mac environments. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8278: Usage test path - Correc...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/127#issuecomment-85456697 @gauravaradhye looks good, merging.. if this break travis you need to fix it :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8251: Adding automation test c...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/128 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py
On March 24, 2015, 11:59 a.m., Sowmya Krishnan wrote: Ship It! Pushed to master: 5f3f20a79ce658077dd527f390cabd5fa29814f2 Please use GitHub pull request in future. Thanks. - Sowmya --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#review77549 --- On March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m., abhinav roy wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/ --- (Updated March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This Patch has following changes : 1. A new script to test host status after enabling/disabling of Pods, Clusters, Zones or by managing/unmanaging of clusters etc. 2. update Modules added for Pod, Zone, cluster classes in base.py Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 5ca1bc2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/diff/ Testing --- Disable the host and it's cluster, ... === TestName: test_01_op_host_capacity_disable_cluster | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's pod, ... === TestName: test_02_op_host_capacity_disable_pod | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's zone, ... === TestName: test_03_op_host_capacity_disable_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request:
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/b527aabfc352474541a2f6c7831b819356ec453a#commitcomment-10363120 I donot think this is good idea to backport centos7 packaging. There is no strict testing on it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix the bug when build apidoc under windo...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/114#issuecomment-85465336 Hi, this commit breaks for unix environments. So I've created a fix using yours which seems to work for me; can you test it on your cygwin environment? - python $thisdir/gen_toc.py $(find . -type f) + PLATFORM=`uname -s` + if [[ $PLATFORM =~ .*WIN.* ]] + then + gen_toc_file=`cygpath -w $thisdir`\\gen_toc.py + argfiles=`find . -type f` + for file in $argfiles; do + echo Parse file $file; + python $gen_toc_file $file; + done + else + python $thisdir/gen_toc.py $(find . -type f) + fi --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[Event] - Cloudstack European User Group
Spring meeting of CSEUG, kindly hosted by BT https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-tickets-16282793273 please register early - limited seats Agenda is TBA - ping me if you have a speaking proposal/idea Kind Regards Giles Giles Sirett CEO [Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align] D: +44 20 3603 0541 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 796 111 2055 giles.sir...@shapeblue.commailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@shapeBluehttps://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: remove stale project cloud-systemvm
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/126#issuecomment-85455210 @DaanHoogland just want to confirm if we are in anyway using those files in systemvm.iso generation or other places? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#review77549 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sowmya Krishnan On March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m., abhinav roy wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/ --- (Updated March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This Patch has following changes : 1. A new script to test host status after enabling/disabling of Pods, Clusters, Zones or by managing/unmanaging of clusters etc. 2. update Modules added for Pod, Zone, cluster classes in base.py Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 5ca1bc2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/diff/ Testing --- Disable the host and it's cluster, ... === TestName: test_01_op_host_capacity_disable_cluster | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's pod, ... === TestName: test_02_op_host_capacity_disable_pod | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's zone, ... === TestName: test_03_op_host_capacity_disable_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy
RE: 2-level authentication implementation issues
Hello, Rohit! Thank you for a reply and all the effort in refactoring the code in 4.5.0. Will give it a try! Kind Regards, A. -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 9:47 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 2-level authentication implementation issues Artjoms, With CloudStack 4.5.0+, you can implement you own authentication plugin, see: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Authentication+Refactoring You may read the default login implementation and saml2 plugin implementation as examples. On Thursday 05 March 2015 02:45 PM, Artjoms Petrovs wrote: Hello, CS Developers! I am developing multi-level authentication for CloudStack v4.4.2 and I got in a little confusion. As I can see all the commands can be called only by authenticated users, the only exception goes for login and logout commands, as it is stated in ApiServlet. Is there a possibility to hack or extend ApiServlet, so custom login command can be called without authentication, meaning the module will be independent (no changes in cloud-server). Kind Regards, Artjoms V. Petrovs http://www.telia.lv/ *Artjoms Petrovs *System Analyst / Programmer Telia Latvija, Ltd. | Lielvardes street 8a, Riga, Latvia, LV-1006 Ph.: +371 67082144 Mob. +371 27498048 artjoms.petr...@telia.lv | telia.lv This email (and any attachements or hyperlinks within it) may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are not entitled to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, disseminate or rely on this email in any way. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by or email and destroy it, and all copies of it. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Re: CloudStack manger HyperV
thanks,i update the hyperv agent is ok.my cloudstack is 4.4.2 ,so i download
the new agent 4.4.2。
wangyuyang1...@163.com
From: Anshul Gangwar
Date: 2015-03-24 15:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack manger HyperV
Which Cloudstack version you are using and from where you have downloaded the
Hyper-V Agent?
Regards,
Anshul
On 24-Mar-2015, at 12:30 pm,
wangyuyang1...@163.commailto:wangyuyang1...@163.com wrote:
HI, ALL
I create vm in hyper-v(win2012 r2)，but throw exception: *.vhdx miss.
I found, while create vm,create *.vhd disk. but start vm founding *.vhdx
disk.
I hope to get some Suggestions for this error.
Thank your very much!!!
ERROR LOG:
2015-03-24 14:12:00,890 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-337:ctx-4b7ac6bf) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:false,details:com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand
fail on exceptioni-2-150-VM: non-existent volume, missing
\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdxsmb://192.168.212.175/primary/b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdx
for drive {
data: {
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO: {
uuid: b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c,
volumeType: ROOT,
dataStore: {
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO: {
uuid: 02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da,
id: 14,
poolType: SMB,
host: 192.168.212.175,
path: /primary?user=administratordomain=wh.comhttp://wh.com,
port: 445,
url:
SMB://192.168.212.175/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da
}
},
name: ROOT-150,
size: 5368709120,
path:
192.168.212.175\\primary\\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,
volumeId: 151,
vmName: i-2-150-VM,
accountId: 2,
format: VHDX,
id: 151,
deviceId: 0,
hypervisorType: Hyperv
}
},
diskSeq: 0,
path:
192.168.212.175\\primary\\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,
type: ROOT,
_details: {
managed: false,
storagePort: 445,
storageHost: 192.168.212.175,
volumeSize: 5368709120
}
},vm:{id:150,name:i-2-150-VM,type:User,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:1073741824,maxRam:1073741824,arch:x86_64,os:Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
(64-bit),bootArgs:,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:62a3a3c5e38d0c7a,params:{},uuid:da6990fe-f5b6-4f70-bae6-d80497468ee1,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da,id:14,poolType:SMB,host:192.168.212.175,path:/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.comhttp://wh.com,port:445,url:SMB://192.168.212.175/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da}},name:ROOT-150,size:5368709120,path:\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdsmb://192.168.212.175/primary/b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,volumeId:151,vmName:i-2-150-VM,accountId:2,format:VHDX,id:151,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdsmb://192.168.212.175/primary/b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHost:192.168.212.175,volumeSize:5368709120}},{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/2/202/202-2-186eb69f-4535-3ed0-8dd7-96805249aff0.iso,origUrl:http://secure-web.cisco.com/1lvHyTMd1BD7fU8mhQcJxYVZfV577-WUFNR3YuwYEjwv1YEq_3q6OzbpEdpTkYUzTcSCIa_E2dxu2l36ib4c4BrrJcpmmcahQ6MsAsy8R2couk0rekrJM7xD7cp-Ca22wTzq669xi7Vfn8ZtW-9LENqR4LsBaiQvPdi7cmv15-oE/http%3A%2F%2F192.168.217.248%2Frhel-server-6.4-x86_64-dvd.iso,uuid:a642a1d2-3ae6-4d9d-8321-45bc6a017903,id:202,format:ISO,accountId:2,checksum:467b53791903f9a0c477cbb1b24ffd1f,hvm:true,displayText:rhel6.4,imageDataStore:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:cifs://192.168.212.175/secondary?user=administratordomain=wh.com,_role:Image}},name:202-2-186eb69f-4535-3ed0-8dd7-96805249aff0,guestOsType:Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
(64-bit),hypervisorType:None}},diskSeq:3,type:ISO}],nics:[{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:1595c094-2d59-4167-93cd-86fcb79d90ae,ip:192.168.216.10,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.216.254,mac:06:6c:60:00:00:74,dns1:8.8.8.8,dns2:,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://216,isolationUri:vlan://216,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false}]},contextMap:{}}}]
wangyuyang1...@163.commailto:wangyuyang1...@163.com
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8251: Adding automation test c...
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/128 CLOUDSTACK-8251: Adding automation test cases for dedicated public IP ranges Test cases for dedicated public IP ranges feature. Tested on KVM setup. Although this test cases won't break any other test cases, it's possible that these test might fail when run in parallel with other test cases due to shared resources in the setup. Hence adding the test suite to maint folder so that it is run separately and serially. Log: Dedicate public IP range to an account in root domain ... === TestName: test_01_dedicate_public_ip_range_root_domain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate public IP range to an account in user domain ... === TestName: test_02_dedicate_public_ip_range_user_domain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate public IP range to an account during its creation only ... === TestName: test_03_dedicate_during_creation_root_domain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate public IP range to an account in user domain during its creation only ... === TestName: test_04_dedicate_during_creation_user_domain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Create guest network in account with dedicated public ip range and acquire IPs in network ... === TestName: test_05_acquire_ip_single_guest_network | Status : SUCCESS === ok Create multiple guest networks and acquire IPs from dedicated range ... === TestName: test_06_acquire_ip_multiple_guest_network | Status : SUCCESS === ok Acquire public IP from dedicated range in network tier of VPC ... === TestName: test_08_acquire_ip_in_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate invalid public IP range to an account ... === TestName: test_10_dedicate_invalid_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate public IP range to invalid account ... === TestName: test_11_dedicate_to_wrong_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate already dedicated public IP range ... === TestName: test_12_dedicate_already_dedicated_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate public IP range to an account having lesser public ip limit than range ... === TestName: test_13_public_ips_limit | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disassociate a public IP from dedicated public IP range ... === TestName: test_14_release_ip_from_dedicated_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Release dedicated public ip range with no IPs acquired ... === TestName: test_15_release_dedicated_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Delete dedicated public IP range with no network rules on IP addresses ... === TestName: test_16_delete_ip_range_no_network_rules | Status : SUCCESS === ok Delete Dedicated public IP range with network rules on IP addresses ... === TestName: test_17_delete_ip_range_network_rules | Status : SUCCESS === ok Delete network with public IP from dedicated range acquired in it ... === TestName: test_18_delete_network | Status : SUCCESS === ok Create guest network in account with dedicated public ip range ... === TestName: test_19_delete_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Create guest network in account with dedicated public ip range ... === TestName: test_20_release_range_not_dedicated | Status : SUCCESS === ok Dedicate a public IP range, acquire some IPs and relese the range ... === TestName: test_21_release_dedicated_range_ip_address_in_use | Status : SUCCESS === ok You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gauravaradhye/cloudstack 8251 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/128.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #128 commit 42da7c2a6170d620222dba958ebb971f7f0811f5 Author: Gaurav Aradhye gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com Date: 2015-03-24T10:46:50Z CLOUDSTACK-8251: Adding automation test cases for dedicated public IP ranges --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: remove stale project cloud-systemvm
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/126#issuecomment-85455368 Since this removes cloud-systemvm project completely, I'll wait for at least one more person to confirm/review before we can merge this into master. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: systemvm: use Debian http redirector for ...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/123 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix the bug when build apidoc under windo...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/114 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: systemvm: use Debian http redirector for ...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/123#issuecomment-85454797 LGTM! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP
Has the idea of a 'light' UI been discussed? More aimed at end users who we could tailor dialog to and keep it fast and simple. I could see this as a good starting point to redevelop the whole UI. On 24 Mar 2015, at 10:53, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Great proposals Sebastien! Let's AWSAPI, improve code, remove dead code, cleanup JIRA/RB cleanup and move to Github PR. I hope we’ll have a better UIs for ACS users soon! Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Fwd: [GSOC] Setting up multiple devcloud host in cloudstack dev environment
yeah ... I replace it with the repo directory /root/gsoc/devcloud/advanced/advanced.json ... devcloud is the cloned git repository from github. There seems to be a issue with marvin I guess... because configuring the deployement manually from the CS UI as listed in advanced.json works.. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Tilak, when you run the following command: python -m marvin.deployDataCenter -i /path/to/GSoC-2014/repo/advanced/advanced.json you replace /path/to/GSoC-2014/repo by a valid one right? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: I couldnt deploy the zone pod cluster successfully hence there were no hosts and I couldnt launch a VM. Later what I did was manually create zone pod cluster and added the host and storage through the UI and it was successfull. The system vms came up nicely. But it gave me connection timed out when I tried to view the console of the CPVM or SSVM. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Will Stevens williamstev...@gmail.com wrote: Can you launch a VM through the CS ui? On Mar 23, 2015 9:14 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Will, yeah cloudstack management is running fine...I can open 127.0.0.1:8080/client on my browser...And there are two vms running..xenserver : I can ssh into it on port and management : i can ssh into it on port 2200. I configured the networking in virtual box under preferences/network/vboxnet0 192.168.56.1 and dhcp disabled...but there is nothing under preferences/network/NAT in the virtualbox...do I have to configure something there?? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Will Stevens williamstev...@gmail.com wrote: Is the cloudstack up and working? Did you check in virtual box if the box(s?) are up? If so can you check the logs? It seems like you are not getting your networking configured because the VM seems to come up but there is no connection. Is the network reported correct? Nat and host only is right? I think that is what I read. Ws On Mar 23, 2015 8:54 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:12 AM Subject: Re: [GSOC] Setting up multiple devcloud host in cloudstack dev environment To: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com I just tried deploying on 4.3 branch using binary directory on 4.3 branch https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/master/basic and followed the instructions given here https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/blob/master/basic/README.md still I am getting the same error... :/ Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 162, in _run_module_as_main __main__, fname, loader, pkg_name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 72, in _run_code exec code in run_globals File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 572, in module deploy.deploy() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 554, in deploy self.loadCfg() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 516, in loadCfg mgtDetails.apiKey, mgtDetails.securityKey = self.registerApiKey() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 485, in registerApiKey listuserRes = self.testClient.getApiClient().listUsers(listuser) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudstackAPIClient.py, line 527, in listUsers response = self.connection.marvinRequest(command, response_type=response, method=method) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py, line 272, in marvinRequest response = jsonHelper.getResultObj(response.json(), response_type) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/requests/models.py, line 802, in json return json.loads(self.text, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/__init__.py, line 413, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/decoder.py, line 402, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/decoder.py, line 420, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError(No JSON object could be decoded, s, idx) simplejson.decoder.JSONDecodeError: No JSON object could be decoded: line
Re: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate 4.4-RC20150324T1321
This contains a good bunch of fixes and would be great if it went through. I'll test this ASAP and vote, need to get rid of 4.5 on my test rig. :-) Thanks Daan Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 12:31:11 Subject: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate 4.4-RC20150324T1321 Hi All, (please note that the last release candidate did not get enough attention to make quorum) I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150324T1321 Commit: 483490534a8a091c7af7c61d1eaf5c0192f646d9 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.4.3 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3 PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request:
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/f68b407283356dd57241af3679171e3e5b0fea82#commitcomment-10370653 The change of packaging/centos63/cloud.spec is repeate the new line. This brings error when packaging. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request:
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/f68b407283356dd57241af3679171e3e5b0fea82#commitcomment-10370666 In packaging/centos63/cloud.spec: In packaging/centos63/cloud.spec on line 283: The change of packaging/centos63/cloud.spec is repeate the new line. This brings error when packaging. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Andrei, I'm certain you are aware of this, but if you really have to move forward with 4.5.1, why not build from source? You can then upgrade once we are ready with 4.5.1 As of now, we are waiting to see if more issues will surface before calling RC2 vote. I've been running ACS 4.5 in lab envs for some time and also tested upgrade path from 4.3 to 4.5. Regards ilya On 3/24/15 5:28 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Hello, Does anyone have an idea when the 4.5.1 is going to be out including the packaged versions? It has been a while since the unfortunate, but well spotted, release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes shortly. Cheers Andrei - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 (+ users) Hi all, I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ 4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ (If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM templates). Happy testing! On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote: I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank spots. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix centos63 rpm packaging
GitHub user ghxandsky opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/129 Fix centos63 rpm packaging Fix centos63 rpm packaging. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ghxandsky/cloudstack 4.4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/129.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #129 commit dcb499ac93580028cf1f1a616fcd4afbf4b6d779 Author: root root@i-gc0rns2i.(none) Date: 2015-03-25T01:19:58Z Fix centos63 rpm packaging --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP
I was having the same idea the other week. There are some serious shortcomings in the current UI (one example is the lack of being able to enable/disable SSH key management on templates when registering them). I think it might be a good idea to radically simplifly the UI that ships with ACS and then start a new ACS subproject (like the AWS or GCE API proxies) for a new, full-featured UI which could run in a different language and have the possibility of running at a different cadence than the ACS management system. This would allow UI bugs and features to be handled faster (or slower) than the core management server functionality and APIs. It might also be worthwhile to explore building the UI in a different language than Java to potentially attract other developers to the ACS project who might be more comfortable in Python, Ruby, or NodeJS. On 03/24/2015 07:47 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote: Has the idea of a 'light' UI been discussed? More aimed at end users who we could tailor dialog to and keep it fast and simple. I could see this as a good starting point to redevelop the whole UI. On 24 Mar 2015, at 10:53, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Great proposals Sebastien! Let's AWSAPI, improve code, remove dead code, cleanup JIRA/RB cleanup and move to Github PR. I hope we’ll have a better UIs for ACS users soon! Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Review Request 32469: Added vMotion related tests for VMFS type storage
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32469/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added Tests for vMotion with VMFS 1. Create VMs on VMFS and live migrate to another hosts. 2. Create VMs and live migrate their volumes to another storage. 3. Restore VMs and live migrate them. 4. Resize volumes and live migrate them etc. Diffs - test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py 2a92914 tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 7f609e7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32469/diff/ Testing --- Testing dont on my local setup with VMFS and primary storage. Thanks, abhinav roy
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any Vmware specific changes. On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and
Re: CI improvment part 1
I'm waking up this old thread. I was reviewing some jenkins jobs and took a closer look at simulatorfast, We currently have a jenkins job running every 20mins for the simulatorfast, That seams great and seams to provide a good coverage and is perform quite fast, although it's currently running on the pytest branch which is now fairly outdated. I've tried a merge into master and endup with a bunch of conflict. Considering the plus value of using pytest, Would it be possible to update and merge pytest branch so we could use it as CI tests? Regards, On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: haven't have time to work on it since last update. -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:53 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su Subject: Re: CI improvment part 1 Hi Edison, Just curious, any update on the pytest effort? Thanks. On Friday 26 September 2014 10:13 AM, Edison Su wrote: Highlights the improvements on marvin I made in these days on pytest branch: 1. Switch test framework from nose to pytest, while also maintain the back- compatibility for existing test cases. pytest is more flexible than nose, more enjoyable to work with. 2. Speed up test speed a LOT: It only takes 250-300 seconds for a single run for all the test cases under test/integration/smoke folder, while it usually takes 40 minutes to run before. The speed up is coming from running test cases in parallel. pytest-xdist is modified to fix the issue: https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/pytest/issue/175/way-to-control-how-pytest- xdist-runs-tests. we have a lot of existing test cases have to run in sequence per test class. 3. Add a new Jenkins job at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/fastsimulatorbuild/, which only takes 22 minutes for a full cycle buildtest. A new VM is created on digitalocean: 4G memory, 40G SSD, and added into Jenkins.buildacloud.org. SSD is life saver, it really makes big difference during build/test. A new docker image is created, which has all the tools installed in order to build and test: e.g. java/mysql/python/git/ installed. A new Jenkins job is created to build and test periodically in every 20 minutes. So far, the Jenkins job works very well, if everybody ok with what I am doing, I want to merge pytest branch into master later. With a quick CI in hand, we then can start to think about how to add gerrit into our system. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and- build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request:
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/b527aabfc352474541a2f6c7831b819356ec453a#commitcomment-10372774 @ghxandsky we use this in production, I think we use only the agent for KVM but still. If people run into problems we'll just have to support. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [DOCKER] cloudstack organisation
LOL, look like Docker support is efficient :-P I'll update jenkins jobs and destroy apachecloudstack org. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: PL, So my bad, I actually own the cloudstack org on Docker hub. I just added you as a member. You can publish your images there and delete the apachecloudstack org. I think it’s better to just use ‘cloudstack' On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: some addition inline: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I've played a little with Docker over the weekend, here are some thought and I'd like to have some input from community around this, 1. simulator: I'v create a Jenkins[1] job that build a simulator container an push it to the docker org: apachecloudstack [2]. It is only done for master branch at the moment and the image is fairly big, ~2GB, using Sebastien's Dockerfile. Cool. And yes the image is big, we can modify the Dockerfile to remove some maven stuff and make it smaller. Maybe even just run the jar like Ian has done for devcloud. This will be perform for other branches but based on commit instead of daily, probably. 2. cloudstack-management + database As the current simulator image contain MySQL, Maven, CloudStack git repo,.. it's quite big and not the Docker way, IMO. Correct. I just did it for devs…this is not meant for any type of prod This should be clear that it is not for prod since the DB would have been pre-installed So I'd like to see how it would make sense provide two containers instead of one: 1. cloudstack-database: mysql database with the initialized DB's (cloud, cloud_usage)... 2. cloudstack-management: pre installed cloudstack-management server including tomcat dependencies,... 3. cloudstack-usage: pre installed cloudstack-usage You can create a mgt server image and then link it to two or one mysql containers. the mgt server image can be setup with the packages. I ran into problems with IP tables etc. since our setup scripts are not meant for containers. I've experience this too, the container would be prepared without cloudstack-setup-management as it expect to modify firewall which is not available into container. This imply that build of those containers would be done thru Jenkins for the most part and use of Dockerfile might be difficult, which wouldn't allow to use dockers automatic builds. you could have dockerfiles and an auto build in docker hub. Just use the build trigger in docker hub to setup a hook in the jenkins job that builds the latest packages. The way I'm seeing things, because the DB would pre-initiated and into a separate container, I would not use dockerfile to build it, unless there is a way to create link at build, this is to provide the smallest container as possible. Also, I would use package (RPM,deb) to install cloudstack-management so it will enforce the test/validation of packaging, and would make containers more close to prod like deployement. You could put the dockerfile in /tools or something Good Idea I'll place Dockerfiles into /tools/docker [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator-docker/ [2] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/apachecloudstack/ On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Look like some work as been done to have a Dockerfile in our repo which build a CloudStack container easily. I'm curious to know if one of us own the cloudstack organisation and if so, if it would make sense to start to have our own automated build of container for CloudStack. I would easily see 2 build job for two containers: cloudstack-management and cloudstack-simulator. we could easily build a nightly build of master and offer latest GA releases. Look like it would be easy to automate builds and the simulator container could be use for the CI as it is for the fast-simulator jenkins tasks. any thought? +1, I committed the Dockerfile. But yes we should have a cloudstack organization in docker hub and setup automated builds. Ideally we can also setup a drone.io instance to do some continuous deployment…but this ties with the overalll jenkins/testing infra that we really need to get cleaned up and organized. -sebastuen
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request:
Hi Daan, Let's have a look tomorrow, ghxandsky refers to changes in CentOS6 package and what we deployed is CentOS7. I do agree CentOS6 should still work (we still need it as well). Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone On 24 Mar 2015, at 18:24, DaanHoogland g...@git.apache.org wrote: Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/b527aabfc352474541a2f6c7831b819356ec453a#commitcomment-10372774 @ghxandsky we use this in production, I think we use only the agent for KVM but still. If people run into problems we'll just have to support. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [DOCKER] cloudstack organisation
PL, So my bad, I actually own the cloudstack org on Docker hub. I just added you as a member. You can publish your images there and delete the apachecloudstack org. I think it’s better to just use ‘cloudstack' On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: some addition inline: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: I've played a little with Docker over the weekend, here are some thought and I'd like to have some input from community around this, 1. simulator: I'v create a Jenkins[1] job that build a simulator container an push it to the docker org: apachecloudstack [2]. It is only done for master branch at the moment and the image is fairly big, ~2GB, using Sebastien's Dockerfile. Cool. And yes the image is big, we can modify the Dockerfile to remove some maven stuff and make it smaller. Maybe even just run the jar like Ian has done for devcloud. This will be perform for other branches but based on commit instead of daily, probably. 2. cloudstack-management + database As the current simulator image contain MySQL, Maven, CloudStack git repo,.. it's quite big and not the Docker way, IMO. Correct. I just did it for devs…this is not meant for any type of prod This should be clear that it is not for prod since the DB would have been pre-installed So I'd like to see how it would make sense provide two containers instead of one: 1. cloudstack-database: mysql database with the initialized DB's (cloud, cloud_usage)... 2. cloudstack-management: pre installed cloudstack-management server including tomcat dependencies,... 3. cloudstack-usage: pre installed cloudstack-usage You can create a mgt server image and then link it to two or one mysql containers. the mgt server image can be setup with the packages. I ran into problems with IP tables etc. since our setup scripts are not meant for containers. I've experience this too, the container would be prepared without cloudstack-setup-management as it expect to modify firewall which is not available into container. This imply that build of those containers would be done thru Jenkins for the most part and use of Dockerfile might be difficult, which wouldn't allow to use dockers automatic builds. you could have dockerfiles and an auto build in docker hub. Just use the build trigger in docker hub to setup a hook in the jenkins job that builds the latest packages. The way I'm seeing things, because the DB would pre-initiated and into a separate container, I would not use dockerfile to build it, unless there is a way to create link at build, this is to provide the smallest container as possible. Also, I would use package (RPM,deb) to install cloudstack-management so it will enforce the test/validation of packaging, and would make containers more close to prod like deployement. You could put the dockerfile in /tools or something Good Idea I'll place Dockerfiles into /tools/docker [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator-docker/ [2] https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/apachecloudstack/ On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Look like some work as been done to have a Dockerfile in our repo which build a CloudStack container easily. I'm curious to know if one of us own the cloudstack organisation and if so, if it would make sense to start to have our own automated build of container for CloudStack. I would easily see 2 build job for two containers: cloudstack-management and cloudstack-simulator. we could easily build a nightly build of master and offer latest GA releases. Look like it would be easy to automate builds and the simulator container could be use for the CI as it is for the fast-simulator jenkins tasks. any thought? +1, I committed the Dockerfile. But yes we should have a cloudstack organization in docker hub and setup automated builds. Ideally we can also setup a drone.io instance to do some continuous deployment…but this ties with the overalll jenkins/testing infra that we really need to get cleaned up and organized. -sebastuen
Re: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP
On Mar 24, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote: Very nice, Congratulations Sebastien! Looking forward to collaborate on list of things you have identified! Thanks Raja, it definitely would be great to get your team’s help with JIRA. I think we need a strong dedicated effort to clear it up and close all old issues. We also need to find a way to develop master better to avoid regressions. There was a lot of talk last summer about gitflow or the like, and we should resurrect this with some pragmatic action that we can build on. For instance thoughts that I have are to make sure that we develop in ‘development’ branch and leave master alone. Then build releases on master through merges. Getting you and your team (and everyone else of course) behind such a scheme (TBD still) would be a huge help. -sebastien Raja -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; market...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP Dear members of the CloudStack community, Last week the Apache Software Foundation board unanimously voted a resolution to make me the new VP of Apache CloudStack. This came after a unanimous vote of the CloudStack PMC and is regular process of our community as described in our bylaws. I am excited to take on this new role after two amazing VP (Chip and Hugo) since CloudStack came to the ASF. Many thanks to them and especially Hugo for the work he has done in the past year. The ASF is setup so that the governance of a project really belongs to the community itself. CloudStack is what we all make it to be, we all have equal footing when time comes to develop the code, create events, take decisions and so on. As VP I do not have a special say in our direction. This governance model is in stark contrast with other open source project that follow more of a benevolent dictator model. I mention this as a bit of disclaimer and to re-enforce the fact that while I have views about what we should do, they are my personal views and that they do not represent any sorts of official roadmaps, and that anyone is welcome to disagree :) In Budapest, we had a great conference. Chip and I showed several CloudStack use cases. Our user base is strong with over 300 production deployments. Our community is large and diverse with 2000 people on the mailing lists, but we need to keep advocating for CloudStack, make it an even greater software and grow our community. At the very least this helps us learn from each other, better our own skills and our employers IT infrastructure. At the very best AWS switches to CloudStack :) So here are some food for thoughts that will hopefully excite you, want to get engage, talk about CloudStack and bring on board your friends: On the code: - - Keep improving quality, remove dead code, cleanup JIRA, cleanup Review Board We have successfully moved to GitHub pull requests, we should stop using RB - Simplify the dev process and adopt a new committing system to avoid regressions at all costs. We have talked about this for a long time but have failed had doing something concrete. It is time. - Remove the AWSAPI (there is a branch without it right now), we should merge it in master I am going to push for IP clearance of ec2stack and gstack to get them under ASF governance. - Several Cloud Providers have unveiled new CloudStack UI, maybe it’s time we do the same. - Solidify the testing infrastructure, keep Jenkins builds running - Brainstorm on the future of CloudStack and IaaS in general. What should CloudStack be in 10 years ? While CloudStack is what it is now, nothing prevents us to re-architect, re-think, re-code it within the current framework. - Finally, package the mgt server and the KVM agent as Docker containers Docker is a great portability mechanism. We should embrace Docker as a packaging tool (first) and provide container images for our mgt server (at a minimum). This could become a type of release artifact that could be easily continuously built. On the ecosystem: - We have a really strong ecosystem. From configuration management tools, API wrappers, PaaS plugins etc. We need to feature our ecosystem clearly on our website, support it and keep on growing it as new technologies emerge. Things that come to mind: - Push to get our Ansible module into the Ansible core - Publish “official” chef recipes to deploy CloudStack - Identify and publish “official” Puppet recipes - Build Docker native templates (coreOS, rancherOS, Snappy, Atomic) - Finally cleanup cloud-init support for CloudStack, this is preventing us from having upstream centOS templates. - Publish playbooks/recipes to deploy workloads on CloudStack (think
Re: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP
Congratulations Sebastien! Totally agree :-) It would really help in speeding up the release cycle and achieve high quality at the same time. We should aim for a release every month if you ask me. I know that sounds impossible now, but let's discuss with such a goal in mind and see what we can do together. Because I believe we can do a lot. At Schuberg Philis we have two serious production environments (running 4.4.2) that we would like to deploy new versions to often (one after another). That should also be convincing for others to install the release or do the upgrade. If only we find ways to make high quality releases often without regression. Further automating (functional) testing, plus making it easier is only one of the things one can think of. Definitely willing to help making this successful :-) We could set up a meeting / hackathon about this in Austin to give it a boost? Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone On 24 Mar 2015, at 20:27, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 24, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote: Very nice, Congratulations Sebastien! Looking forward to collaborate on list of things you have identified! Thanks Raja, it definitely would be great to get your team’s help with JIRA. I think we need a strong dedicated effort to clear it up and close all old issues. We also need to find a way to develop master better to avoid regressions. There was a lot of talk last summer about gitflow or the like, and we should resurrect this with some pragmatic action that we can build on. For instance thoughts that I have are to make sure that we develop in ‘development’ branch and leave master alone. Then build releases on master through merges. Getting you and your team (and everyone else of course) behind such a scheme (TBD still) would be a huge help. -sebastien Raja -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; market...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP Dear members of the CloudStack community, Last week the Apache Software Foundation board unanimously voted a resolution to make me the new VP of Apache CloudStack. This came after a unanimous vote of the CloudStack PMC and is regular process of our community as described in our bylaws. I am excited to take on this new role after two amazing VP (Chip and Hugo) since CloudStack came to the ASF. Many thanks to them and especially Hugo for the work he has done in the past year. The ASF is setup so that the governance of a project really belongs to the community itself. CloudStack is what we all make it to be, we all have equal footing when time comes to develop the code, create events, take decisions and so on. As VP I do not have a special say in our direction. This governance model is in stark contrast with other open source project that follow more of a benevolent dictator model. I mention this as a bit of disclaimer and to re-enforce the fact that while I have views about what we should do, they are my personal views and that they do not represent any sorts of official roadmaps, and that anyone is welcome to disagree :) In Budapest, we had a great conference. Chip and I showed several CloudStack use cases. Our user base is strong with over 300 production deployments. Our community is large and diverse with 2000 people on the mailing lists, but we need to keep advocating for CloudStack, make it an even greater software and grow our community. At the very least this helps us learn from each other, better our own skills and our employers IT infrastructure. At the very best AWS switches to CloudStack :) So here are some food for thoughts that will hopefully excite you, want to get engage, talk about CloudStack and bring on board your friends: On the code: - - Keep improving quality, remove dead code, cleanup JIRA, cleanup Review Board We have successfully moved to GitHub pull requests, we should stop using RB - Simplify the dev process and adopt a new committing system to avoid regressions at all costs. We have talked about this for a long time but have failed had doing something concrete. It is time. - Remove the AWSAPI (there is a branch without it right now), we should merge it in master I am going to push for IP clearance of ec2stack and gstack to get them under ASF governance. - Several Cloud Providers have unveiled new CloudStack UI, maybe it’s time we do the same. - Solidify the testing infrastructure, keep Jenkins builds running - Brainstorm on the future of CloudStack and IaaS in general. What should CloudStack be in 10 years ? While CloudStack is what it is now, nothing prevents us to re-architect, re-think, re-code it within the current framework. - Finally,
Re: [ACS 4.5.1 RC1] Caught SQLException on startup
Thanks for sharing Alena! On 24-Mar-2015, at 6:02 am, Alena Prokharchyk alena1...@gmail.com wrote: network_group table is long gone. I guess the only one reason for the keeping table related mysql statements in ConfigurationServerImpl.java - is to handle the upgrade scenarios. We should probably just disable the logging for this case. The situation with creating duplicated system/admin user is different. I believe the records for them get created as a part of the setup scripts when install from rpm. And as on dev environment those scripts don't get run, the records get inserted by ConfigurationServerImpl on a server startup. For the rpm deployment case, the latter insertion will result in duplicates, hence the silent exception catch. Ideally, the fix should be - create the users on a first server startup in the Java code only, so its common for dev and users environments. Not a high priority fix. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Erik, Yes, I've seen them before. The network_group table does not exist in ACS, I've seen this issue as well but this is probably harmless and perhaps has to do with maintaining migrations from old/other CCP releases though I'm not sure. I'll try to see if we can address them, though they look harmless to me. On Monday 23 March 2015 04:31 PM, Erik Weber wrote: Anyone else see these during startup? 2015-03-23 11:59:32,712 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught exception when inserting system account: Duplicate entry '1' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,713 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught SQLException when inserting system user: Duplicate entry '1' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,714 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught SQLException when creating admin account: Duplicate entry '2' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,715 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught SQLException when inserting admin user: Duplicate entry '2' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,716 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught (SQL?)Exception: no network_group Table 'cloud.network_group' doesn't exist 2015-03-23 11:59:32,791 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) resource_count table has records missing for some accounts...going to insert them 2015-03-23 11:59:32,806 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Inserting resource count of type user_vm for account id=3 The duplicate keys doesn't really worry me much, as that should mean it's already there, but the Table 'cloud.network_group' doesn't exist is a different story.. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Alena Prokharchyk https://twitter.com/Lemonjet http://www.linkedin.com/pub/alena-prokharchyk/13/282/a7b Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 |
CloudStack manger HyperV
HI, ALL
I create vm in hyper-v(win2012 r2)，but throw exception: *.vhdx miss.
I found, while create vm,create *.vhd disk. but start vm founding
*.vhdx disk.
I hope to get some Suggestions for this error.
Thank your very much!!!
ERROR LOG:
2015-03-24 14:12:00,890 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-337:ctx-4b7ac6bf) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:false,details:com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand
fail on exceptioni-2-150-VM: non-existent volume, missing
\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdx for drive {
data: {
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO: {
uuid: b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c,
volumeType: ROOT,
dataStore: {
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO: {
uuid: 02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da,
id: 14,
poolType: SMB,
host: 192.168.212.175,
path: /primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com,
port: 445,
url:
SMB://192.168.212.175/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da
}
},
name: ROOT-150,
size: 5368709120,
path:
192.168.212.175\\primary\\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,
volumeId: 151,
vmName: i-2-150-VM,
accountId: 2,
format: VHDX,
id: 151,
deviceId: 0,
hypervisorType: Hyperv
}
},
diskSeq: 0,
path:
192.168.212.175\\primary\\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,
type: ROOT,
_details: {
managed: false,
storagePort: 445,
storageHost: 192.168.212.175,
volumeSize: 5368709120
}
},vm:{id:150,name:i-2-150-VM,type:User,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:1073741824,maxRam:1073741824,arch:x86_64,os:Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
(64-bit),bootArgs:,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:62a3a3c5e38d0c7a,params:{},uuid:da6990fe-f5b6-4f70-bae6-d80497468ee1,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da,id:14,poolType:SMB,host:192.168.212.175,path:/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com,port:445,url:SMB://192.168.212.175/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da}},name:ROOT-150,size:5368709120,path:\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,volumeId:151,vmName:i-2-150-VM,accountId:2,format:VHDX,id:151,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHost:192.168.212.175,volumeSize:5368709120}},{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/2/202/202-2-186eb69f-4535-3ed0-8dd7-96805249aff0.iso,origUrl:http://192.168.217.248/rhel-server-6.4-x86_64-dvd.iso,uuid:a642a1d2-3ae6-4d9d-8321-45bc6a017903,id:202,format:ISO,accountId:2,checksum:467b53791903f9a0c477cbb1b24ffd1f,hvm:true,displayText:rhel6.4,imageDataStore:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:cifs://192.168.212.175/secondary?user=administratordomain=wh.com,_role:Image}},name:202-2-186eb69f-4535-3ed0-8dd7-96805249aff0,guestOsType:Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
(64-bit),hypervisorType:None}},diskSeq:3,type:ISO}],nics:[{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:1595c094-2d59-4167-93cd-86fcb79d90ae,ip:192.168.216.10,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.216.254,mac:06:6c:60:00:00:74,dns1:8.8.8.8,dns2:,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://216,isolationUri:vlan://216,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false}]},contextMap:{}}}]
wangyuyang1...@163.com
Re: [ACS 4.5.1 RC1] Caught SQLException on startup
Thanks for the insight Alena :-) -- Erik Den tirsdag 24. mars 2015 skrev Alena Prokharchyk alena1...@gmail.com følgende: network_group table is long gone. I guess the only one reason for the keeping table related mysql statements in ConfigurationServerImpl.java - is to handle the upgrade scenarios. We should probably just disable the logging for this case. The situation with creating duplicated system/admin user is different. I believe the records for them get created as a part of the setup scripts when install from rpm. And as on dev environment those scripts don't get run, the records get inserted by ConfigurationServerImpl on a server startup. For the rpm deployment case, the latter insertion will result in duplicates, hence the silent exception catch. Ideally, the fix should be - create the users on a first server startup in the Java code only, so its common for dev and users environments. Not a high priority fix. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:; wrote: Hi Erik, Yes, I've seen them before. The network_group table does not exist in ACS, I've seen this issue as well but this is probably harmless and perhaps has to do with maintaining migrations from old/other CCP releases though I'm not sure. I'll try to see if we can address them, though they look harmless to me. On Monday 23 March 2015 04:31 PM, Erik Weber wrote: Anyone else see these during startup? 2015-03-23 11:59:32,712 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught exception when inserting system account: Duplicate entry '1' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,713 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught SQLException when inserting system user: Duplicate entry '1' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,714 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught SQLException when creating admin account: Duplicate entry '2' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,715 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught SQLException when inserting admin user: Duplicate entry '2' for key 'PRIMARY' 2015-03-23 11:59:32,716 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Caught (SQL?)Exception: no network_group Table 'cloud.network_group' doesn't exist 2015-03-23 11:59:32,791 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) resource_count table has records missing for some accounts...going to insert them 2015-03-23 11:59:32,806 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Inserting resource count of type user_vm for account id=3 The duplicate keys doesn't really worry me much, as that should mean it's already there, but the Table 'cloud.network_group' doesn't exist is a different story.. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com javascript:; Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Alena Prokharchyk https://twitter.com/Lemonjet http://www.linkedin.com/pub/alena-prokharchyk/13/282/a7b
Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#review77529 --- test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#comment125630 It's better to have the method definitions outside of the class so it may be used later for the entire suite. test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#comment125631 host_state is not used. Can be removed from both definition and invocation test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#comment125633 host_state not used here as well. Can be removed test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#comment125635 host_state can be removed here too test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/#comment125637 These tests can be run without hardware as well I presume. If you think so, can you change this? - Sowmya Krishnan On Feb. 3, 2015, 12:25 p.m., abhinav roy wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/ --- (Updated Feb. 3, 2015, 12:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This Patch has following changes : 1. A new script to test host status after enabling/disabling of Pods, Clusters, Zones or by managing/unmanaging of clusters etc. 2. update Modules added for Pod, Zone, cluster classes in base.py Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/diff/ Testing --- Disable the host and it's cluster, ... === TestName: test_01_op_host_capacity_disable_cluster | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's pod, ... === TestName: test_02_op_host_capacity_disable_pod | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's zone, ... === TestName: test_03_op_host_capacity_disable_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4 for centos7
Github user K0zka commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/125#issuecomment-85372139 Looks good, I can only test it in the evening, anyone if you get there first pls go ahead and merge! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Review Request 30553: A new script to test_hosts and added update modules for few classes in base.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/ --- (Updated March 24, 2015, 8:48 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Changes --- Changes made after second review from Sowmya Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This Patch has following changes : 1. A new script to test host status after enabling/disabling of Pods, Clusters, Zones or by managing/unmanaging of clusters etc. 2. update Modules added for Pod, Zone, cluster classes in base.py Diffs (updated) - test/integration/component/test_escalations_hosts.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 5ca1bc2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30553/diff/ Testing --- Disable the host and it's cluster, ... === TestName: test_01_op_host_capacity_disable_cluster | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's pod, ... === TestName: test_02_op_host_capacity_disable_pod | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host and it's zone, ... === TestName: test_03_op_host_capacity_disable_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok Disable the host then unmanage the cluster, ... === TestName: test_04_disable_host_unmanage_cluster_check_hosts_status | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 4 tests in 126.360s Thanks, abhinav roy
RE: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP
Very nice, Congratulations Sebastien! Looking forward to collaborate on list of things you have identified! Raja -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; market...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP Dear members of the CloudStack community, Last week the Apache Software Foundation board unanimously voted a resolution to make me the new VP of Apache CloudStack. This came after a unanimous vote of the CloudStack PMC and is regular process of our community as described in our bylaws. I am excited to take on this new role after two amazing VP (Chip and Hugo) since CloudStack came to the ASF. Many thanks to them and especially Hugo for the work he has done in the past year. The ASF is setup so that the governance of a project really belongs to the community itself. CloudStack is what we all make it to be, we all have equal footing when time comes to develop the code, create events, take decisions and so on. As VP I do not have a special say in our direction. This governance model is in stark contrast with other open source project that follow more of a benevolent dictator model. I mention this as a bit of disclaimer and to re-enforce the fact that while I have views about what we should do, they are my personal views and that they do not represent any sorts of official roadmaps, and that anyone is welcome to disagree :) In Budapest, we had a great conference. Chip and I showed several CloudStack use cases. Our user base is strong with over 300 production deployments. Our community is large and diverse with 2000 people on the mailing lists, but we need to keep advocating for CloudStack, make it an even greater software and grow our community. At the very least this helps us learn from each other, better our own skills and our employers IT infrastructure. At the very best AWS switches to CloudStack :) So here are some food for thoughts that will hopefully excite you, want to get engage, talk about CloudStack and bring on board your friends: On the code: - - Keep improving quality, remove dead code, cleanup JIRA, cleanup Review Board We have successfully moved to GitHub pull requests, we should stop using RB - Simplify the dev process and adopt a new committing system to avoid regressions at all costs. We have talked about this for a long time but have failed had doing something concrete. It is time. - Remove the AWSAPI (there is a branch without it right now), we should merge it in master I am going to push for IP clearance of ec2stack and gstack to get them under ASF governance. - Several Cloud Providers have unveiled new CloudStack UI, maybe it’s time we do the same. - Solidify the testing infrastructure, keep Jenkins builds running - Brainstorm on the future of CloudStack and IaaS in general. What should CloudStack be in 10 years ? While CloudStack is what it is now, nothing prevents us to re-architect, re-think, re-code it within the current framework. - Finally, package the mgt server and the KVM agent as Docker containers Docker is a great portability mechanism. We should embrace Docker as a packaging tool (first) and provide container images for our mgt server (at a minimum). This could become a type of release artifact that could be easily continuously built. On the ecosystem: - We have a really strong ecosystem. From configuration management tools, API wrappers, PaaS plugins etc. We need to feature our ecosystem clearly on our website, support it and keep on growing it as new technologies emerge. Things that come to mind: - Push to get our Ansible module into the Ansible core - Publish “official” chef recipes to deploy CloudStack - Identify and publish “official” Puppet recipes - Build Docker native templates (coreOS, rancherOS, Snappy, Atomic) - Finally cleanup cloud-init support for CloudStack, this is preventing us from having upstream centOS templates. - Publish playbooks/recipes to deploy workloads on CloudStack (think Hadoop, Spark, Kubernetes) - Work actively on up to date integration with CloudFoundry On documentation: - I and couple others successfully moved our docs to the Read The Docs service. This was a first great move but we need to finish the job. We need to rethink our documentation tree, maybe merge all guides in one, correct the docs, create a new theme for it. This is an easy area to contribute to if you are using cloudstack. Just send a pull request (click on the top right ribbon). If you don’t know how, then it will teach you how to use github, great exercise. We also need to routinely build the multi languages support. On Events: - We have at least four great events coming in 2015. Austin, Seattle, Tokyo and Dublin. Let’s meet at one of those events. Let’s submit
Re: CloudStack manger HyperV
Which Cloudstack version you are using and from where you have downloaded the
Hyper-V Agent?
Regards,
Anshul
On 24-Mar-2015, at 12:30 pm,
wangyuyang1...@163.commailto:wangyuyang1...@163.com wrote:
HI, ALL
I create vm in hyper-v(win2012 r2)，but throw exception: *.vhdx miss.
I found, while create vm,create *.vhd disk. but start vm founding *.vhdx
disk.
I hope to get some Suggestions for this error.
Thank your very much!!!
ERROR LOG:
2015-03-24 14:12:00,890 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-337:ctx-4b7ac6bf) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:false,details:com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand
fail on exceptioni-2-150-VM: non-existent volume, missing
\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdxsmb://192.168.212.175/primary/b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdx
for drive {
data: {
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO: {
uuid: b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c,
volumeType: ROOT,
dataStore: {
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO: {
uuid: 02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da,
id: 14,
poolType: SMB,
host: 192.168.212.175,
path: /primary?user=administratordomain=wh.comhttp://wh.com,
port: 445,
url:
SMB://192.168.212.175/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da
}
},
name: ROOT-150,
size: 5368709120,
path:
192.168.212.175\\primary\\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,
volumeId: 151,
vmName: i-2-150-VM,
accountId: 2,
format: VHDX,
id: 151,
deviceId: 0,
hypervisorType: Hyperv
}
},
diskSeq: 0,
path:
192.168.212.175\\primary\\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,
type: ROOT,
_details: {
managed: false,
storagePort: 445,
storageHost: 192.168.212.175,
volumeSize: 5368709120
}
},vm:{id:150,name:i-2-150-VM,type:User,cpus:1,minSpeed:1000,maxSpeed:1000,minRam:1073741824,maxRam:1073741824,arch:x86_64,os:Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
(64-bit),bootArgs:,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:false,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:62a3a3c5e38d0c7a,params:{},uuid:da6990fe-f5b6-4f70-bae6-d80497468ee1,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da,id:14,poolType:SMB,host:192.168.212.175,path:/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.comhttp://wh.com,port:445,url:SMB://192.168.212.175/primary?user=administratordomain=wh.com/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=02e4-3af1-3a31-8535-e557eff849da}},name:ROOT-150,size:5368709120,path:\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdsmb://192.168.212.175/primary/b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,volumeId:151,vmName:i-2-150-VM,accountId:2,format:VHDX,id:151,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:\\192.168.212.175\primary\b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhdsmb://192.168.212.175/primary/b0b6d56d-41ef-43a6-8ab2-2091854f6b1c.vhd,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHost:192.168.212.175,volumeSize:5368709120}},{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/2/202/202-2-186eb69f-4535-3ed0-8dd7-96805249aff0.iso,origUrl:http://secure-web.cisco.com/1lvHyTMd1BD7fU8mhQcJxYVZfV577-WUFNR3YuwYEjwv1YEq_3q6OzbpEdpTkYUzTcSCIa_E2dxu2l36ib4c4BrrJcpmmcahQ6MsAsy8R2couk0rekrJM7xD7cp-Ca22wTzq669xi7Vfn8ZtW-9LENqR4LsBaiQvPdi7cmv15-oE/http%3A%2F%2F192.168.217.248%2Frhel-server-6.4-x86_64-dvd.iso,uuid:a642a1d2-3ae6-4d9d-8321-45bc6a017903,id:202,format:ISO,accountId:2,checksum:467b53791903f9a0c477cbb1b24ffd1f,hvm:true,displayText:rhel6.4,imageDataStore:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:cifs://192.168.212.175/secondary?user=administratordomain=wh.com,_role:Image}},name:202-2-186eb69f-4535-3ed0-8dd7-96805249aff0,guestOsType:Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
(64-bit),hypervisorType:None}},diskSeq:3,type:ISO}],nics:[{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:1595c094-2d59-4167-93cd-86fcb79d90ae,ip:192.168.216.10,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.216.254,mac:06:6c:60:00:00:74,dns1:8.8.8.8,dns2:,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://216,isolationUri:vlan://216,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false}]},contextMap:{}}}]
wangyuyang1...@163.commailto:wangyuyang1...@163.com
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4 for centos7
Hi, The rpm installed just fine and I was able to add the centos7 box to CloudStack 4.4.2 We do have some extra patches in our 4.4.2 version (all committed back to ACS and should become 4.4.3) but I don't think that makes any difference for this rpm. Thanks Daan! Sent from my iPhone On 24 Mar 2015, at 08:12, K0zka g...@git.apache.org wrote: Github user K0zka commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/125#issuecomment-85372139 Looks good, I can only test it in the evening, anyone if you get there first pls go ahead and merge! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Fwd: [GSOC] Setting up multiple devcloud host in cloudstack dev environment
I couldnt deploy the zone pod cluster successfully hence there were no hosts and I couldnt launch a VM. Later what I did was manually create zone pod cluster and added the host and storage through the UI and it was successfull. The system vms came up nicely. But it gave me connection timed out when I tried to view the console of the CPVM or SSVM. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Will Stevens williamstev...@gmail.com wrote: Can you launch a VM through the CS ui? On Mar 23, 2015 9:14 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Will, yeah cloudstack management is running fine...I can open 127.0.0.1:8080/client on my browser...And there are two vms running..xenserver : I can ssh into it on port and management : i can ssh into it on port 2200. I configured the networking in virtual box under preferences/network/vboxnet0 192.168.56.1 and dhcp disabled...but there is nothing under preferences/network/NAT in the virtualbox...do I have to configure something there?? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Will Stevens williamstev...@gmail.com wrote: Is the cloudstack up and working? Did you check in virtual box if the box(s?) are up? If so can you check the logs? It seems like you are not getting your networking configured because the VM seems to come up but there is no connection. Is the network reported correct? Nat and host only is right? I think that is what I read. Ws On Mar 23, 2015 8:54 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:12 AM Subject: Re: [GSOC] Setting up multiple devcloud host in cloudstack dev environment To: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com I just tried deploying on 4.3 branch using binary directory on 4.3 branch https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/master/basic and followed the instructions given here https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/blob/master/basic/README.md still I am getting the same error... :/ Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 162, in _run_module_as_main __main__, fname, loader, pkg_name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 72, in _run_code exec code in run_globals File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 572, in module deploy.deploy() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 554, in deploy self.loadCfg() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 516, in loadCfg mgtDetails.apiKey, mgtDetails.securityKey = self.registerApiKey() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 485, in registerApiKey listuserRes = self.testClient.getApiClient().listUsers(listuser) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudstackAPIClient.py, line 527, in listUsers response = self.connection.marvinRequest(command, response_type=response, method=method) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py, line 272, in marvinRequest response = jsonHelper.getResultObj(response.json(), response_type) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/requests/models.py, line 802, in json return json.loads(self.text, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/__init__.py, line 413, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/decoder.py, line 402, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/decoder.py, line 420, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError(No JSON object could be decoded, s, idx) simplejson.decoder.JSONDecodeError: No JSON object could be decoded: line 1 column 0 (char 0) I cant figure out if the issue is in python or simplejson so I reinstalled both but I am still stuck at the same stage On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I tried the binary-installation-basic one but ended up getting the errors I posted above. I followed up trying the not binary advanced as you are provisioning. Doing vagrant up setup xenserver and management server successfully. I installed Marvin successfully doing 2015-03-24 04:41:49,970 - DEBUG - Parsing Test data successfully using pip install tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-0.1.0.tar.gz. But when I try to deploy the configuration using python -m marvin.deployDataCenter -i /path/to/GSoC-2014/repo/advanced/advanced.json I get the following error in the log files
