date:20150710

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/576#issuecomment-120314141
  
LGTM, thanks for wading, @snuf 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

openssl/cloudstack

2015-07-10 Thread John Kinsella

Folks - just put up a brief blog post about the latest OpenSSL issue and how 
that affects CloudStack. Long story short - we think it does, but are verifying 
that. Hopefully will have an update by the end of the day.

https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/cloudstack_and_openssl_cve_2015

Will update here and on the blog/twitters as we know more.

John

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8622: Reinstate working sessio...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/574#issuecomment-120276323
  
LGTM be sure to add 2 'this closes #'  lines. one for this and one for 308


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8622: Reinstate working sessio...

2015-07-10 Thread wilderrodrigues

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/574#issuecomment-120256667
  
page refreshes, opening
multiple tabs,

Nice!

I also liked the String.format() calls. I should use it more as well. For 
some stuff still using MessageFormat from the text package. But String.format() 
makes life easier and code more readable.

LGTM :+1: 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: Introducing Boris Schrijver

2015-07-10 Thread Giles Sirett

Welcome Boris


Kind Regards
Giles

D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com




 -Original Message-
 From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
 Sent: 08 July 2015 16:08
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: bo...@pcextreme.nl
 Subject: Introducing Boris Schrijver

 Hi all,

 As you might know, we at PCextreme are using CloudStack for our public cloud
 offering and have been looking for a CloudStack dev for a long time.

 We found one; so let me introduce Boris Schrijver.

 Boris will be our fulltime CloudStack developer with no other purpose then
 making CloudStack better :)

 CloudStack is a Apache project, so it will be Boris contributing to 
 CloudStack and
 NOT PCextreme as a company. He might become a committer one day, who
 knows.

 Today is his first day, so it will take a bit before you'll see the first PR 
 coming in.

 Wido

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8605: KVM: Config Drive and ge...

2015-07-10 Thread kishankavala

GitHub user kishankavala opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/577

CLOUDSTACK-8605: KVM: Config Drive and getVmIp support

- CLOUDSTACK-8324 added support for External DHCP/DNS support along with 
ConfigDrive for XenServer
- FS link: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53740797
- This PR adds KVM support for config drive and getVmIpAddress assigned by 
external DHCP
- genisoimage package dependency is added for creating config drive ISO
- libguestfs is used to get IPAddress from guest VM. Linux: From dhcp 
leases file. Windows: From registry


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/kishankavala/cloudstack master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/577.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #577


commit faab39fdd52026ba7c03f8143331d1004338f5ff
Author: Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com
Date:   2015-06-26T09:48:01Z

kvm config drive

commit 220e714b5194a33471fc5728c1a6dc69ca0c98e9
Author: Kishan Kavala kis...@apache.org
Date:   2015-07-01T12:40:02Z

Unit test for GetVmIpAddressCommand

commit b2e8bfdff5cc8013a9d50132a941f7849a2949b2
Author: Kishan Kavala kis...@apache.org
Date:   2015-07-01T14:51:01Z

Test IP not in CIDR

commit 3fc60e31d9bcf68a4901dbc059e02c2868943035
Author: Kishan Kavala kis...@apache.org
Date:   2015-07-10T08:24:30Z

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'

Conflicts:

plugins/hypervisors/kvm/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java

commit e1d1974a06b334bc1be603823f5f44b51bdb3ab2
Author: Kishan Kavala kis...@apache.org
Date:   2015-07-10T08:26:26Z

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'

Conflicts:

plugins/hypervisors/kvm/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java

commit a3fe3ae233a23f8ac7dcc7485adac9089a7810a8
Author: Kishan Kavala kis...@apache.org
Date:   2015-07-10T08:58:52Z

Fix Libvirt getVmIP unit test




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: Add option to authorize ...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-120389991
  
@wilderrodrigues thanks. You can select the authorise sso checkbox and 
submit if you've a SAML IDP server. 

For test setup, you can follow this: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SAML+2.0+Plugin#SAML2.0Plugin-Testing


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Cloudstack 8612

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/562#discussion_r34351937
  
--- Diff: 
framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/dao/SyncQueueItemDaoImpl.java
 ---
@@ -141,23 +141,46 @@ public int getActiveQueueItemCount(long queueId) {
 }
 
 @Override
-public ListSyncQueueItemVO getBlockedQueueItems(long thresholdMs, 
boolean exclusive) {
+public ListSyncQueueItemVO getBlockedQueueItems(long thresholdMs, 
long snapshotThresholdMs, String jobCmd, boolean exclusive) {
 Date cutTime = DateUtil.currentGMTTime();
+ListSyncQueueItemVO l = new ArrayListSyncQueueItemVO();
 
-SearchBuilderSyncQueueItemVO sbItem = createSearchBuilder();
-sbItem.and(lastProcessMsid, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessMsid(), SearchCriteria.Op.NNULL);
-sbItem.and(lastProcessNumber, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessNumber(), SearchCriteria.Op.NNULL);
-sbItem.and(lastProcessTime, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessTime(), SearchCriteria.Op.NNULL);
-sbItem.and(lastProcessTime2, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessTime(), SearchCriteria.Op.LT);
-
-sbItem.done();
+Date date1 = new Date(cutTime.getTime() - thresholdMs);
+String  dateString1 = 
DateUtil.getDateDisplayString(TimeZone.getTimeZone(GMT), date1);
 
-SearchCriteriaSyncQueueItemVO sc = sbItem.create();
-sc.setParameters(lastProcessTime2, new Date(cutTime.getTime() - 
thresholdMs));
+Date date2 = new Date(cutTime.getTime() - snapshotThresholdMs);
+String  dateString2 = 
DateUtil.getDateDisplayString(TimeZone.getTimeZone(GMT), date2);
 
-if(exclusive)
-return lockRows(sc, null, true);
-return listBy(sc, null);
+String sql = SELECT s.id, s.queue_id, s.content_type, 
s.content_id, s.queue_proc_msid, s.queue_proc_number, s.queue_proc_time, 
s.created FROM sync_queue_item AS s  +
+JOIN async_job as a ON s.content_id = a.id WHERE 
s.queue_proc_msid IS NOT NULL AND s.queue_proc_number IS NOT NULL AND 
s.queue_proc_time IS NOT NULL +
+ AND ((a.job_cmd NOT LIKE ? AND s.queue_proc_time  ? ) 
OR (a.job_cmd LIKE ? AND s.queue_proc_time  ?));
+TransactionLegacy txn = TransactionLegacy.currentTxn();
+PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
+try {
+pstmt = txn.prepareAutoCloseStatement(sql);
--- End diff --

please use try-with-resource


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Cloudstack 8612

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/562#discussion_r34351953
  
--- Diff: 
framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/dao/SyncQueueItemDaoImpl.java
 ---
@@ -141,23 +141,46 @@ public int getActiveQueueItemCount(long queueId) {
 }
 
 @Override
-public ListSyncQueueItemVO getBlockedQueueItems(long thresholdMs, 
boolean exclusive) {
+public ListSyncQueueItemVO getBlockedQueueItems(long thresholdMs, 
long snapshotThresholdMs, String jobCmd, boolean exclusive) {
 Date cutTime = DateUtil.currentGMTTime();
+ListSyncQueueItemVO l = new ArrayListSyncQueueItemVO();
 
-SearchBuilderSyncQueueItemVO sbItem = createSearchBuilder();
-sbItem.and(lastProcessMsid, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessMsid(), SearchCriteria.Op.NNULL);
-sbItem.and(lastProcessNumber, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessNumber(), SearchCriteria.Op.NNULL);
-sbItem.and(lastProcessTime, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessTime(), SearchCriteria.Op.NNULL);
-sbItem.and(lastProcessTime2, 
sbItem.entity().getLastProcessTime(), SearchCriteria.Op.LT);
-
-sbItem.done();
+Date date1 = new Date(cutTime.getTime() - thresholdMs);
+String  dateString1 = 
DateUtil.getDateDisplayString(TimeZone.getTimeZone(GMT), date1);
 
-SearchCriteriaSyncQueueItemVO sc = sbItem.create();
-sc.setParameters(lastProcessTime2, new Date(cutTime.getTime() - 
thresholdMs));
+Date date2 = new Date(cutTime.getTime() - snapshotThresholdMs);
+String  dateString2 = 
DateUtil.getDateDisplayString(TimeZone.getTimeZone(GMT), date2);
 
-if(exclusive)
-return lockRows(sc, null, true);
-return listBy(sc, null);
+String sql = SELECT s.id, s.queue_id, s.content_type, 
s.content_id, s.queue_proc_msid, s.queue_proc_number, s.queue_proc_time, 
s.created FROM sync_queue_item AS s  +
+JOIN async_job as a ON s.content_id = a.id WHERE 
s.queue_proc_msid IS NOT NULL AND s.queue_proc_number IS NOT NULL AND 
s.queue_proc_time IS NOT NULL +
+ AND ((a.job_cmd NOT LIKE ? AND s.queue_proc_time  ? ) 
OR (a.job_cmd LIKE ? AND s.queue_proc_time  ?));
+TransactionLegacy txn = TransactionLegacy.currentTxn();
+PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
+try {
+pstmt = txn.prepareAutoCloseStatement(sql);
+pstmt.setString(1, % + jobCmd + %);
+pstmt.setString(2, dateString1);
+pstmt.setString(3, % + jobCmd + %);
+pstmt.setString(4, dateString2);
+ResultSet rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
--- End diff --

please use try-with-resource


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8620 :skip test cases if rbd s...

2015-07-10 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/570


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1356

See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1356/

--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2173
originally caused by:
 Started by an SCM change
 Started by upstream project build-master build number 2460
 originally caused by:
  Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on simulator in workspace 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/
  /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
  /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git # timeout=400
Fetching upstream changes from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
  /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400
  /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
  +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:735)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:983)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:1016)
at hudson.scm.SCM.checkout(SCM.java:484)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command /usr/bin/git fetch --tags 
--progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128:
stdout: 
stderr: error:  while accessing 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/info/refs

fatal: HTTP request failed

at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1591)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1379)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:86)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:324)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
at ..remote call to simulator(Native Method)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356)
at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor375.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:131)
at sun.proxy.$Proxy46.execute(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:733)
... 11 more
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
[xUnit] [INFO] - Starting to record.
[xUnit] [INFO] - Processing JUnit
[xUnit] [INFO] - [JUnit] - No test report file(s) were found with the pattern 
'xunit.xml' relative to 
'http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/' for the testing 
framework 'JUnit'.  Did you enter a pattern relative to the correct directory?  
Did you generate the result report(s) for 'JUnit'?
[xUnit] [ERROR] - No test reports found for the metric 'JUnit' with the 
resolved pattern 'xunit.xml'. Configuration error?.
[xUnit] [INFO] - Failing BUILD.
[xUnit]

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #497

See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/497/changes

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8620 :skip test cases if rbd s...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/570#issuecomment-120408068
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8622: Reinstate working sessio...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/574#issuecomment-120396037
  
Thanks for the reviews, merged on 4.5/master now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-4.5-singlerun #252

See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/252/

--
Started by upstream project build-4.5-simulator build number 307
originally caused by:
 Started by upstream project build-4.5 build number 497
 originally caused by:
  Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on simulator in workspace 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/ws/
  /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
  /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git # timeout=400
Fetching upstream changes from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
  /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400
  /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
  +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:735)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:983)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:1016)
at hudson.scm.SCM.checkout(SCM.java:484)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command /usr/bin/git fetch --tags 
--progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128:
stdout: 
stderr: error:  while accessing 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/info/refs

fatal: HTTP request failed

at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1591)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1379)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:86)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:324)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
at ..remote call to simulator(Native Method)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356)
at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor375.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:131)
at sun.proxy.$Proxy46.execute(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:733)
... 11 more
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
[xUnit] [INFO] - Starting to record.
[xUnit] [INFO] - Processing JUnit
[xUnit] [INFO] - [JUnit] - No test report file(s) were found with the pattern 
'xunit.xml' relative to 
'http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/ws/' for the 
testing framework 'JUnit'.  Did you enter a pattern relative to the correct 
directory?  Did you generate the result report(s) for 'JUnit'?
[xUnit] [ERROR] - No test reports found for the metric 'JUnit' with the 
resolved pattern 'xunit.xml'. Configuration error?.
[xUnit] [INFO] - Failing BUILD.
[xUnit] [INFO] - There are errors

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Improved message for peeples to actually ...

2015-07-10 Thread kishankavala

Github user kishankavala commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/576#issuecomment-120400649
  
Can we rephrase it as Expected 1 VDI template but found... 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8622: Reinstate working sessio...

2015-07-10 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/574


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reinstate working sessions in browser

2015-07-10 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/308


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Cloudstack 8612

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/562#discussion_r34352466
  
--- Diff: 
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
 ---
@@ -5035,9 +5039,16 @@ public VmwareHypervisorHost 
getHyperHost(VmwareContext context) {
 @Override
 public VmwareContext getServiceContext(Command cmd) {
 VmwareContext context = null;
+int vCenterSessionTimeout;
+if (cmd != null  cmd.getContextParam(vCenterSessionTimeout) != 
null) {
+vCenterSessionTimeout = 
NumbersUtil.parseInt(cmd.getContextParam(vCenterSessionTimeout), 120);
--- End diff --

why not use _vCenterSessionTimeout here?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Cloudstack 8612

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/562#issuecomment-120406704
  
Can you add unit- and/or integration tests?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Is ACS will Support Docker

2015-07-10 Thread Keerthiraja SJ

Hi All,

Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS / CoreOS so
that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign same as now public
IP to the container.

Thanks,
Keerthi

[CLOUDSTACK SV MEETUP] Call for Speakers - August 4th

2015-07-10 Thread Karen Vuong

Hi all,

Is anyone going to be traveling to the Silicon Valley on August 4th? The
CloudStack Silicon Valley User Group is planning to hold a meetup that
evening. Currently, we have David Nalley on the agenda and if anyone else
is interested in speaking at the meetup - please let me, John Kinsella or
Ilya know.

http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Silicon-Valley-User-Group/

Thanks!

Regards,

Karen

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8379:add support to marvin to ...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/158#discussion_r34343974
  
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py ---
@@ -790,8 +790,13 @@ def createZones(self, zones):
 self.createPrimaryStorages(zone.primaryStorages,
zoneId,
)
-enabled = getattr(zone, 'enabled', 'True')
-if enabled == 'True' or enabled is None:
+
+#get the variable from config file whether to enable zone 
or not
+#If enabled tag is not found in config file, enable the 
zone otherwise
+#act as mentioned in the config file
+enabled = str(getattr(zone, 'enabled', None))
+enabled = enabled if enabled else 'true'
+if enabled.lower() == 'true':
--- End diff --

should work but why not make a str('boolean') a real bool? 
  if enabled.lower == true:
enable = True
  else:
enable = False
  if enable:


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8379:add support to marvin to ...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/158#issuecomment-120371884
  
I don't see that the travis failures are related to this code but the 
change is not so significant that push through makes sense. Would be nice to 
have quick iterations on these kinds of refactorings.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8457: Add option to authorize ...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-120391833
  
on Chrome, dev tools if you set g_idpList to null, you should see the saml 
stuff in the form.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: package-rhel63-4.5 #292

See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-4.5/292/

--
Started by upstream project build-4.5 build number 497
originally caused by:
 Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-4.5/ws/
  /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
  /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git # timeout=400
Fetching upstream changes from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
  /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400
  /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
  +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:735)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:983)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:1016)
at hudson.scm.SCM.checkout(SCM.java:484)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command /usr/bin/git fetch --tags 
--progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128:
stdout: 
stderr: error:  while accessing 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/info/refs

fatal: HTTP request failed

at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1591)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1379)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:86)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:324)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
at ..remote call to rpmbuilder-2(Native Method)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356)
at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor375.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:131)
at sun.proxy.$Proxy46.execute(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:733)
... 11 more
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
Archiving artifacts

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: dhcp/dns offload feature config dirve cha...

my bad, I would like to see $LGTM (as in on the start of a line),
though. This looks like a comment at first.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, sateesh-chodapuneedi
g...@git.apache.org wrote:
 Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the pull request:

 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/568#issuecomment-120414615

 @DaanHoogland

 I think there are 2 LGTM on this one - from @sanju1010  @kishankavala

  sanju1010 added a note a day ago
  Need to comment this if DHCP Server is available in the shared network 
 broadcast domain while running tests. Looks good to me.

 kishankavala commented a day ago
 Looks good to me.
 Commented on older PR earlier.
 PR #552 can be removed




 ---
 If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
 reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
 enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
 contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
 with INFRA.
 ---



-- 
Daan

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: dhcp/dns offload feature config dirve cha...

2015-07-10 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/568#issuecomment-120414615
  
@DaanHoogland 

I think there are 2 LGTM on this one - from @sanju1010  @kishankavala 

 sanju1010 added a note a day ago
 Need to comment this if DHCP Server is available in the shared network 
broadcast domain while running tests. Looks good to me.

kishankavala commented a day ago
Looks good to me.
Commented on older PR earlier.
PR #552 can be removed




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1357

See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1357/

--
Started by upstream project build-master-simulator build number 2174
originally caused by:
 Started by an SCM change
 Started by upstream project build-master build number 2461
 originally caused by:
  Started by an SCM change
 Started by an SCM change
 Started by an SCM change
 Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on simulator in workspace 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/
  /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
  /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git # timeout=400
Fetching upstream changes from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
  /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400
  /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
  +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:735)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:983)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:1016)
at hudson.scm.SCM.checkout(SCM.java:484)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command /usr/bin/git fetch --tags 
--progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128:
stdout: 
stderr: error:  while accessing 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/info/refs

fatal: HTTP request failed

at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1591)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1379)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:86)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:324)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
at ..remote call to simulator(Native Method)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356)
at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor375.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:131)
at sun.proxy.$Proxy46.execute(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:733)
... 11 more
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
[xUnit] [INFO] - Starting to record.
[xUnit] [INFO] - Processing JUnit
[xUnit] [INFO] - [JUnit] - No test report file(s) were found with the pattern 
'xunit.xml' relative to 
'http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/' for the testing 
framework 'JUnit'.  Did you enter a pattern relative to the correct directory?  
Did you generate the result report(s) for 'JUnit'?
[xUnit] [ERROR] - No test reports found for the metric 'JUnit' with the 
resolved pattern

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: dhcp/dns offload feature config dirve cha...

I don't see two LGTM on this one. What happened?

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:20 AM, asfgit g...@git.apache.org wrote:
 Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/568


 ---
 If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
 reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
 enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
 contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
 with INFRA.
 ---



-- 
Daan

Re: Custom dictionary implementation


On 01-Jul-2015, at 1:52 pm, Ramzi Youssefi 
ryouss...@gmail.commailto:ryouss...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm implementing a UI Plugin and I would like to have a custom dictionary
for the labels.
Could you guys please provide an example on how to do this?
I need three different languages and I would like to have the labels in the
dictionary within the plugin.

Put in a dictionary js file with key values you want to use.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.orghttp://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Jenkin automated job to create release package

2015-07-10 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion

Hi,
I've create a collection of jenkins jobs [1] allowing to create packages of
a release and publish them on cloudstack.apt-get.eu so current community
yum and apt repos get updated.

I've also add pgp signature[2] for RPM's and generate MD5sum.

The idea is to make the packaging generation super easy for Release Manager
once RC voted. So now, to create  packages we just need to fire
Create-Release-Packages
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/build-release/job/Create-Release-Packages/specifying
the git
tag (ex: 4.4.4) the release branch name (ex:4.4) and if new systemvm
template is required.  Then it triggered 4 jenkins jobs automatically.


Make sense?

Do we have a release to build now? :-DJust did 4.4.4


[1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/build-release/
[2] http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/RPM-GPG-KEY

Re: Jenkin automated job to create release package

great work Pierre-Luc, no we are working on 4.5.2, nothing yet

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi,
 I've create a collection of jenkins jobs [1] allowing to create packages of
 a release and publish them on cloudstack.apt-get.eu so current community
 yum and apt repos get updated.

 I've also add pgp signature[2] for RPM's and generate MD5sum.

 The idea is to make the packaging generation super easy for Release Manager
 once RC voted. So now, to create  packages we just need to fire
 Create-Release-Packages
 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/build-release/job/Create-Release-Packages/specifying
 the git
 tag (ex: 4.4.4) the release branch name (ex:4.4) and if new systemvm
 template is required.  Then it triggered 4 jenkins jobs automatically.


 Make sense?

 Do we have a release to build now? :-DJust did 4.4.4


 [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/build-release/
 [2] http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/RPM-GPG-KEY



-- 
Daan

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8623: CPVM fails to start afte...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571#issuecomment-120476327
  
I would like to see tests with such a change as well


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Release principles for Apache CloudStack

While I like the ideas generally [1], some concerns and observations that I 
wish could be considered;

- active contributor crunch:

we don’t have large number of active people working towards testing, fixing 
bugs and release, and reviewing/merging PRs on *master*; this affects the 
agility of any process or workflow we want to put in, or expect resolution in a 
certain window (3-5 days etc.);

- diverse interests:

our user-base may not necessarily want to upgrade to newer version of 
CloudStack even if they can proved to be quite stable; in-fact commercially 
some of us are paid to maintain stable branches and support users who are still 
on 4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 etc; based on my experience, a typical enterprise users 
usually stick with a version (that works for them) for at least 6 months, while 
smb user or in-house consumers are quite agile who may upgrade as quickly as 
when new releases are made;

- diverse branching/merging workflow usage and understanding:

the bugfix workflow may not be acceptable (to go on master first), a lot of 
people have their own way of branching/merging in their organisations that 
affect how they do it in the the project

- waiting time on new changes:

since we don’t have large number of active testers and developers who can fix 
bugs rapidly, freezing master and doing the release may take a lot of time 
(unless if we can put a hard deadline or have some schedule to support that?), 
in which case new features and refactoring work will have to lay hanging (and 
some rebase/code-rework may be needed later when they are merged, when master 
is open)

- release risk:

after a release x.y.0 is made and since master can receive new features, 
refactoring work; the next x.y.1 can potentially add more regressions due to 
those new features and refactoring/re-architectural work

- release maintenance and support demands:

historically there has been an assumed or known stable release that is fairly 
tested in the wild and has built trust due to usage by users (through meetups, 
users ML, customer interactions etc), in the past those versions were 4.2.1 
then 4.3.1/4.3.2, now based on my experience the last stable release is 4.5.1

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack

On 02-Jul-2015, at 5:16 pm, Remi Bergsma r...@remi.nlmailto:r...@remi.nl 
wrote:

Hi all,

We already agreed contributions should always go via a PR and require two 
LGTM’s before we merge. Let me propose the next step on how I think we should 
do release management for 4.6 and on.

I talked to several people over the past weeks and wrote this wiki article:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack
 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack

If you like this way of working, I volunteer to be your RM :-)

Like folks suggested earlier, it would be nice to work on this with multiple 
people. So, feel free to join. Maybe @dahn @bhaisaab and/or others are willing 
to teach me some of their tricks.

Regards,
Remi


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.orghttp://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: CS 4.3.2 RPM builds have dependencies on i686 glibc?! while 4.3.1 do not.

France,

Sorry I missed this email. Was your issue solved? The ACS repo you’re using is 
same as upstream 4.3.2 release, including the required. dependencies.

On 28-Jun-2015, at 7:13 pm, France 
mailingli...@isg.simailto:mailingli...@isg.si wrote:

Hi guys,

we are upgrading CS 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 currently.

Official repo listed on: https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html which is: 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/http://get.eu/rhel/ is currently down.
I was able to find packages on some other mirror: 
http://mirrors.coreix.net/cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/http://get.eu/rhel/4.3/
 just to test it out.
The below description is also true if, using repos from Shapeblue 
(http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3, 
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/), which are currently 
working. We will be installing from Shapeblues main repo.

After updating whole system, only CS was left. However I see that it wants to 
pull i686 libraries!
It seems to me that there is an error in packaging process or. does CS 
upgrading from 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 suddenly require i686 glibc to work?

[root@mc1 yum.repos.d]# yum clean
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Error: clean requires an option: headers, packages, metadata, dbcache, plugins, 
expire-cache, rpmdb, all
[root@mc1 yum.repos.d]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Setting up Update Process
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirror.lihnidos.orghttp://mirror.lihnidos.org
* epel: mirror.vutbr.cz
* extras: mirror.lihnidos.orghttp://mirror.lihnidos.org
* updates: mirror.lihnidos.orghttp://mirror.lihnidos.org
118 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package cloudstack-awsapi.x86_64 0:4.3.1-1.el6 will be updated
--- Package cloudstack-awsapi.x86_64 0:4.3.2-1.el6 will be an update
--- Package cloudstack-common.x86_64 0:4.3.1-1.el6 will be updated
--- Package cloudstack-common.x86_64 0:4.3.2-1.el6 will be an update
-- Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) for package: 
cloudstack-common-4.3.2-1.el6.x86_64
-- Processing Dependency: libuuid.so.1 for package: 
cloudstack-common-4.3.2-1.el6.x86_64
--- Package cloudstack-management.x86_64 0:4.3.1-1.el6 will be updated
--- Package cloudstack-management.x86_64 0:4.3.2-1.el6 will be an update
--- Package cloudstack-usage.x86_64 0:4.3.1-1.el6 will be updated
--- Package cloudstack-usage.x86_64 0:4.3.2-1.el6 will be an update
-- Running transaction check
--- Package glibc.i686 0:2.12-1.149.el6_6.9 will be installed
-- Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so(NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3) for package: 
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.9.i686
-- Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so for package: 
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.9.i686
--- Package libuuid.i686 0:2.17.2-12.18.el6 will be installed
-- Running transaction check
--- Package nss-softokn-freebl.i686 0:3.14.3-22.el6_6 will be installed
-- Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved


PackageArch 
   VersionRepository
  Size

Updating:
cloudstack-awsapi  x86_64   
   4.3.2-1.el6apache-cloudstack 
  84 M
cloudstack-common  x86_64   
   4.3.2-1.el6apache-cloudstack 
  94 M
cloudstack-management  x86_64   
   4.3.2-1.el6apache-cloudstack 
  75 M
cloudstack-usage   x86_64   
   4.3.2-1.el6apache-cloudstack 
  39 M
Installing for dependencies:
glibc  i686 
   2.12-1.149.el6_6.9 updates   
 4.3 M
libuuidi686 
   2.17.2-12.18.el6   base  
  69 k
nss-softokn-freebl i686 
   3.14.3-22.el6_6updates   
 157 k

Transaction Summary

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Findbugs issues with instance acces to st...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/573#issuecomment-120456014
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Improved message for peeples to actually ...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/576#issuecomment-120455357
  
LGTM. @snuf see if you can improve the statement as Kishan suggests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Coverity resource leaks

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/578#issuecomment-120455619
  
LGTM (squash maybe)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8623: CPVM fails to start afte...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/571#issuecomment-120456206
  
LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: findbugs: deal with all the encoding issu...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/467#issuecomment-120495209
  
@DaanHoogland was this committed to master?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [4.5] Issue logging in under User account

Try with latest 4.5? The API you listed is called when you open the UI, it 
checks for certain capabilities to initialize some global javascript variable 
(those with g_ prefix in cloudStack.js etc) and checks if the user is logged in.

On 09-Jul-2015, at 10:35 am, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

Hi,

I recently updated my local 4.5 branch to what's in the CloudStack repo and
I noticed a problem trying to log in as a user of a User account (I get
back a 432 and the CloudStack GUI doesn't display an error message or
anything). (If I type in an incorrect password, I get back a proper error
message, though.)

http://192.168.129.50:8080/client/api?command=listCapabilitiesresponse=jsonsessionkey=PvVFTR5yXM4tITDZUZ6WFHbfhE0_=1436418146466
432 (432)

Has anyone else had this trouble?

Thanks,

--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.orghttp://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Build failed in Jenkins: package-rhel63-4.5 #293

See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-4.5/293/

--
Started by user Pierre-Luc Dion
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-4.5/ws/
  /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
  /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git # timeout=400
Fetching upstream changes from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
  /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400
  /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress 
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
  +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:735)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:983)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:1016)
at hudson.scm.SCM.checkout(SCM.java:484)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command /usr/bin/git fetch --tags 
--progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git 
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128:
stdout: 
stderr: error:  while accessing 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/info/refs

fatal: HTTP request failed

at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1591)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1379)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:86)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:324)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
at ..remote call to rpmbuilder-2(Native Method)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356)
at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor375.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:131)
at sun.proxy.$Proxy46.execute(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:733)
... 11 more
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
Archiving artifacts

Re: noredist on build.apache.o


On 16-Jun-2015, at 2:12 pm, Daan Hoogland 
daan.hoogl...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

Is there any objections from the foundation to put noredist files on
builds.apache.orghttp://builds.apache.org for a noredist build? I would like 
the pullrequest
builder to report on all modules before crying victory on a PR.

+1

You may grab the dependency jars from here: 
https://github.com/bhaisaab/cloudstack-nonoss

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.orghttp://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: Can we use components based on MIT License?


On 16-Jun-2015, at 5:23 am, ilya 
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.commailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:

General question, can we add/use components based on MIT License?

cc Sebastien/David - just to be sure

I think so, we’re already using jquery. See NOTICE file for details.


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.orghttp://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates: CLOUDSTACK-4757

Likitha, any update on merging this branch?

On 16-Jun-2015, at 3:37 am, ilya 
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.commailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Likitha,

Hope your day is well,

Just a friendly follow up to see if you might have a chance in merging this 
branch in.

Thanks
ilya

On 5/6/15 10:38 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Likitha,

  Thanks for updating, I think it is a very useful feature and will ease the 
work of migrating from VMWare setup to a cloudstack setup.

-abhi

On 07-May-2015, at 9:11 am, Likitha Shetty 
likitha.she...@citrix.commailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com wrote:

The feature is code complete and is present in feature branch 
(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multiple-disk-ovahttp://us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova
 ).

But since it has been a while I don’t think it will be an easy merge into 
master. In any case, I will soon start working on the merge.

Thanks,
Likitha

-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 12:28 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Likitha Shetty; Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Subject: Re: Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates: 
CLOUDSTACK-4757

Can anyone comment what state this feature is in ?

On 05-May-2015, at 11:58 am, Abhinandan Prateek 
agneya2...@yahoo.com.INVALIDmailto:agneya2...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote:

The work on support for ova with multiple disk was started last year.
Can someone update in what state it is in as the ticket shows that this is 
still in progress ?

FS: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+OVA+files+containing+multiple+disks
 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+OVA+files+containing+multiple+disks

-abhi
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  
Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/18IPXeCxMuL0ZGsCjfo3x7938ovd8trrcZQ3f0WxzmuNeY5ssDccHvBBo_Z2Vu3BvLhttp://web.cisco.com/18IPXeCxMuL0ZGsCjfo3x7938ovd8trrcZQ3f0WxzmuNeY5ssDccHvBBo_Z2Vu3BvLe8HGArqlk7dQ5Owav1FAi03yijmr9kgDlWeLCe-JPQTOUEA9VH0Q0knXZtDHrOMSIPNocelxhrplz180xrN_Aw_u0QPQDtH9VgrlmlHxM0bvn8NF407Uf1xkQ88GKqd/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment 
frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1z27zdQXT0sqtwzAJRMsmbAvF4jnvvyiDarQcGzEW0L_b80Xh2SRRG0pSPS-gB5DLpmjza3rEULSdHr50euau0C836H0PRZMXhuoueRBM1btsZylOGr3QwPtRV5pSrzfBkiw0NGNJt5aLvxtww8_hr129cE5XVWnbozKsfLim1yVgKYgqGBWaP33PJ7oO7aOR/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F
CloudStack 
Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Pqr-yJu7fnoRJVFY5xhjRF8rnDNcT3cpHwUsdl1sU_bAZ8Et_4oaHPdN5KySeak5l9ej2HJjcFKiGBp9-qT89eCPloGedaXLdL4dTDGkpJg5kcymHfWIhwut2P0e-DAhZgJxu35u8Q3K5tYoOaeaveoi4LgpYtGZt2iVtbOEiEPdoP579T39kCA0DAMh8X8d/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1cOTTac79V0xUuX8MYnPy2tG5A45XPf06HDXeyZuAWIvG3uAigfNQjz_ZeHkBcWxiHXbUWExKVjwAO8BMs1f2ug1kF4nG0kMXpxzW__Im1D1ZCBFLtM2JmLctCcXKUalUbWhwaOvae8dZxoKjFeVUVKOoGZFBgqfNkG_0paIwnK0MguhWoX6mJu9Sx7D9lN1F/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-software-engineering%2F
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/18DkP5kIP2TW2gdWkWCJ4u9ktfsBAyMjnYvSKzsIomqX84q2pE2DpDT6kgEcJjakCgJR7qWg-9VKWhZDxdWbElIQcou2X1BYXJOzm7qy_-ZpMSZ2Z23CFXdaTGVV9uzpM-t19kCM4FO0oj5tGqFufuCI0sWu3p7zEnkxHL0-XhxlJ0aTDdRgVYcw0yvN2agCn/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infrastructure-support%2F
CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1myEW2ul7tEiy7AbKqaFo819HOXbHuU1vyqNuEpaJd-1K269PZHuoG4HobTzoCwjuqdKu89SB6fGoPoWb9VLYP5aEJbdixKIedc6DpoeK8S6efTtgiHw5nBN4WQvO2DSDRN1x2FO4sTI1n4tlag0DaAcUIHHEdtupa1zqmE0fewfLyh3BYbD6wUcFJsSAkxAO/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-training%2F

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge

Re: libvirt exception

Wei - is this issue fixed on 4.5/master?

On 11-May-2015, at 12:32 pm, Wei ZHOU 
ustcweiz...@gmail.commailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Mike,

Please apply the following patch to cloudstack, and copy the file
agent/bindir/libvirtqemuhook.in to repace /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu on your
hosts

--start

diff --git a/agent/bindir/libvirtqemuhook.in b/agent/bindir/
libvirtqemuhook.in
index 7bf9634..a895280 100755
--- a/agent/bindir/libvirtqemuhook.in
+++ b/agent/bindir/libvirtqemuhook.in
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
import sys
+import re
from xml.dom.minidom import parse
from cloudutils.configFileOps import configFileOps
from cloudutils.networkConfig import networkConfig
@@ -24,21 +25,29 @@ def isOldStyleBridge(brName):
   return True
else:
   return False
+def isNewStyleBridge(brName):
+if re.match(rbr(\w+)-(\d+), brName) == None:
+   return False
+else:
+   return True
def getGuestNetworkDevice():
netlib = networkConfig()
cfo = configFileOps(/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties)
guestDev = cfo.getEntry(guest.network.device)
enslavedDev = netlib.getEnslavedDev(guestDev, 1)
-return enslavedDev
+return enslavedDev.split(.)[0]
def handleMigrateBegin():
try:
domain = parse(sys.stdin)
for interface in domain.getElementsByTagName(interface):
source = interface.getElementsByTagName(source)[0]
bridge = source.getAttribute(bridge)
-if not isOldStyleBridge(bridge):
+if isOldStyleBridge(bridge):
+vlanId = bridge.replace(cloudVirBr,)
+elif isNewStyleBridge(bridge):
+vlanId = re.sub(rbr(\w+)-,,bridge)
+else:
continue
-vlanId = bridge.replace(cloudVirBr,)
phyDev = getGuestNetworkDevice()
newBrName=br + phyDev + - + vlanId
source.setAttribute(bridge, newBrName)

-end-

Kind regards,
Wei


2015-05-10 7:35 GMT+02:00 Mike C 
mcrosson_cloudst...@nusku.netmailto:mcrosson_cloudst...@nusku.net:

On 2015-05-08 20:07, Marcus wrote:

Can you confirm that those bridges and bond devices exist prior to
attempting migration, and that the VMs are attached to them and work?
Perhaps a 'brctl show' and 'virsh dumpxml'. Those look like they should be
cloudstack-generated guest network bridges and libvirt is complaining they
don't exist

Everything as far as I can tell is working minus this migration. I have a
few virtual routers running on this machine and VMs, each environment
running on the box seems to be doing working just fine. The base mgmtbr0,
cloudbr0, cloudbr1 all come up at boot prior to CloudStack and are working.

Command output is below.

Also: the router seems to have been restarted and was allocated on the
machine I was trying to migrate it to. Trying to migrate it back resulted
in the same error message.

-- Mike


# brctl show
bridge name bridge id   STP enabled interfaces
breth0-1209 8000.6805ca095d7f   no  eth0.1209
breth0-1221 8000.6805ca095d7f   no  eth0.1221
   vnet0
   vnet3
cloud0  8000.fe00a9fe0380   no  vnet1
cloudbr08000.6805ca095d7f   no  eth0.1100
   vnet2
cloudbr18000.6805ca095d7f   no  eth0.1200
mgmtbr0 8000.002564b522ef   no  eth1
virbr0  8000.   yes

# virsh dumpxml r-93-XML
domain type='kvm' id='18'
 namer-93-VM/name
 uuid5269e919-564a-4986-92c1-07464e99e3ce/uuid
 descriptionDebian GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)/description
 memory unit='KiB'262144/memory
 currentMemory unit='KiB'262144/currentMemory
 vcpu placement='static'1/vcpu
 cputune
   shares500/shares
 /cputune
 resource
   partition/machine/partition
 /resource
 os
   type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-i440fx-trusty'hvm/type
   boot dev='cdrom'/
   boot dev='hd'/
 /os
 features
   acpi/
   apic/
   pae/
 /features
 cpu
 /cpu
 clock offset='utc'/
 on_poweroffdestroy/on_poweroff
 on_rebootrestart/on_reboot
 on_crashdestroy/on_crash
 devices
   emulator/usr/bin/kvm-spice/emulator
   disk type='file' device='disk'
 driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/
 source
file='/mnt/d5174632-721e-39ed-b93b-462539f63c77/c1b45654-5e74-420e-bf91-5beb745546f8'/
 target dev='hda' bus='ide'/
 alias name='ide0-0-0'/
 address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/
   /disk
   disk type='file' device='cdrom'
 driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none'/
 source file='/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso'/
 target dev='hdc' bus='ide'/
 readonly/
 alias name='ide0-1-0'/
 address type='drive' controller='0' bus='1'

Re: 4.5.2 open issues remaining

Thanks for the effort Daan. Though, by removing the fix version it will be
harder to search issues that need to be fixed on 4.5.2 etc.

On 09-Jul-2015, at 3:50 pm, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.commailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

Can everybody look at [1] and look if further tickets can be closed. I
reduced the list by 60 tickets moving inactive tickets to 'Future' and
closing what I knew could be closed. The main objective of course is
to get 4.5.2 out and voted in;)

[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.5.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20ASC
--
Daan

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue

[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]

M. +91 88 262 30892 |
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.orghttp://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company
incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [4.5] Issue logging in under User account

2015-07-10 Thread Mike Tutkowski

I can try to update again. I noticed this about two days ago when I had
completed a rebase off of the newest at that time.

Thanks

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

  Try with latest 4.5? The API you listed is called when you open the UI,
 it checks for certain capabilities to initialize some global javascript
 variable (those with g_ prefix in cloudStack.js etc) and checks if the user
 is logged in.

 On 09-Jul-2015, at 10:35 am, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 Hi,

 I recently updated my local 4.5 branch to what's in the CloudStack repo and
 I noticed a problem trying to log in as a user of a User account (I get
 back a 432 and the CloudStack GUI doesn't display an error message or
 anything). (If I type in an incorrect password, I get back a proper error
 message, though.)

 http://192.168.129.50:8080/client/api?
 command=listCapabilitiesresponse=jsonsessionkey=PvVFTR5yXM4tITDZUZ6WFHbfhE0_=1436418146466
 432 (432)

 Has anyone else had this trouble?

 Thanks,

 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
 http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*


 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue




 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




  Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
 services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.




-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Java 8

Ping Wilder - any progress/plan on moving forward (perhaps after 4.6?).

On 01-May-2015, at 4:07 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

Hi Marcus,

Sorry for the push, I think after doing the whole CitrixResourceBase refactor I 
also got a bit attached to the whole thing/solution. ;)

Thanks for the input you gave. I will finish the refactor and apply it to both 
implementations.

Cheers,
Wilder


On 01 May 2015, at 09:06, Marcus 
shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Oh, and of course the annotation added to the wrapper looks like:


...

@ResourceWrapper(handles =  CheckHealthCommand.class)

public final class LibvirtCheckHealthCommandWrapper

...


maybe 'wraps' or 'wrapperfor' would be better than 'handles' in your naming 
scheme. You get the idea.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Marcus 
shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, this wrapper is a good step forward. It's totally fine to continue on 
that path because it is obviously better and makes it easy to switch to 
autodetection anytime later by simply adding the annotation. Sorry if I got a 
bit passionate about that, but as you mention I also get tired of adding things 
in multiple places, and the annotations have worked well in the API and provide 
a good model to emulate for consistency.

I can't share code, because these extensions to LibvirtComputingResource that 
I've provided for other companies have not been open sourced. I can speak more 
generically though about methods.

To answer question a, reflection allows you to do something like:

Reflections reflections = new 
Reflections(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper);
SetClass? extends CommandWrapper wrappers = 
reflections.getSubTypesOf(CommandWrapper.class);

So here in new Reflections we are automatically filtering for just the 
wrappers that would apply to the KVM plugin.
Then to finish it off, you iterate through the wrappers and do:

ResourceWrapper annotation = wrapper.getAnnotation(ResourceWrapper.class);
citrixCommands.put(annotation.handles(), wrapper.newInstance());

Sorry, I guess that's four lines, plus the relevant for loop. And probably a 
null check or something for the annotation. You also have to add the annotation 
class itself, and add a line for the annotation in each wrapper, but in the end 
when we add new Commands, we won't have to touch anything but the new class 
that handles the command.


public @interface ResourceWrapper {

   Class? extends Command handles();

}

There's an example of something similar to this in KVMStoragePoolManager.java 
(annotation is StoragePoolInfo.java). This example has actually been adapted 
from that. Also to a lesser extent in the API server, but it is spread across a 
bunch of classes.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Wilder Rodrigues 
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hi Marcus,

Thanks for the email… I’m always in for improvements. But why can’t you share 
the code?

Few points below:

1. I added an subclassing example of LibvirtComputingResource because you 
mentioned it in a previous email:

On 23 Apr 2015, at 17:26, Marcus 
shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

I mentioned the reflection model because that's how I tend to handle
the commands when subclassing LibvirtComputingResource.

2. Current situation with LibvirtComputingResource on Master is:

a. 67 IFs
b. 67 private/protected methods that are used only there
c. If a new Command is added it means we will have a new IF and a new private 
method
e. Maintenance is hell, test is close to zero and code quality is below 
expectations

That being said, the main idea with the refactor is to change structure only, 
not behaviour. So what I’m doing is to simply move the code out the 
LibvirtCompRes and write tests for it, keeping the behaviour the same - to be 
done in a next phase.
If you look at the changes you will see that some wrappers are already 100% 
covered. However, some others have 4% or 8% (not that much though). I would 
like to refactor that as well, but that could change behaviour (mentioned 
above) which I don’t want to touch now.

3. With the new situation:

a. No IFs
b. All methods wrapped by other classes (command wrappers) - loosely coupled, 
easier to test and maintain
c. If a new Command is added we would have to add a command wrapper and 1 line 
in the request wrapper implementation ( I know, it hurts you a bit) - but 
please bear with me for the good news.

4. the warnings are due to that:
   HashtableClass? extends Command, CommandWrapper()

   No big deal.

As I understood from  your first paragraph we would have to annotated the 
commands classes, right? I mean, all of them.

That’s something I wouldn’t do in this phase, to be honest. It might seem 
harmless to do, but I like to break things down a bit and have more isolation 
in my changes.

What’s next: I will finish

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Coverity resource leaks

GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/578

Coverity resource leaks



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack 
coverity-resource-leaks

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/578.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #578


commit b082443518bb2225dec3973b76b365a8ccbcf5e9
Author: Daan Hoogland d...@onecht.net
Date:   2015-07-10T14:31:22Z

coverity in upgrade code
 1164030: memory upgrade for ssvm
 1164031: image store details encryption

commit 706ce7f5ed33e421db1a750afb42d9ffe805206f
Author: Daan Hoogland d...@onecht.net
Date:   2015-07-10T14:45:16Z

coverity 1148416: auto close server socket




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Jenkin automated job to create release package

2015-07-10 Thread Wido den Hollander

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 07/10/2015 08:17 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
 Hi, I've create a collection of jenkins jobs [1] allowing to create
 packages of a release and publish them on cloudstack.apt-get.eu so
 current community yum and apt repos get updated.
 
 I've also add pgp signature[2] for RPM's and generate MD5sum.
 
 The idea is to make the packaging generation super easy for Release
 Manager once RC voted. So now, to create  packages we just need to
 fire Create-Release-Packages 
 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/build-release/job/Create-Release-
Packages/specifying

 
the git
 tag (ex: 4.4.4) the release branch name (ex:4.4) and if new
 systemvm template is required.  Then it triggered 4 jenkins jobs
 automatically.
 
 
 Make sense?
 
Awesome! I think we should review the directory structure though.

Eg:

http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/6/4.5
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/7/4.5

Instead of having http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/ and
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos7/

Wido

 Do we have a release to build now? :-DJust did 4.4.4
 
 
 [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/build-release/ [2]
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/RPM-GPG-KEY
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Soxt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Java 8

2015-07-10 Thread Wido den Hollander

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 07/10/2015 09:22 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
 Ping Wilder - any progress/plan on moving forward (perhaps after
 4.6?).
 

I don't think there is? Since Ubuntu 14.04 doesn't support Java 8 in
any package form we can't really continue.

Ubuntu 16.04 will ship with Java 8 and that will be the next LTS.

Wido

 On 01-May-2015, at 4:07 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi Marcus,
 
 Sorry for the push, I think after doing the whole
 CitrixResourceBase refactor I also got a bit attached to the whole
 thing/solution. ;)
 
 Thanks for the input you gave. I will finish the refactor and apply
 it to both implementations.
 
 Cheers, Wilder
 
 
 On 01 May 2015, at 09:06, Marcus
 shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadowsor@gmai
l.com
 wrote:
 
 Oh, and of course the annotation added to the wrapper looks like:
 
 
 ...
 
 @ResourceWrapper(handles =  CheckHealthCommand.class)
 
 public final class LibvirtCheckHealthCommandWrapper
 
 ...
 
 
 maybe 'wraps' or 'wrapperfor' would be better than 'handles' in
 your naming scheme. You get the idea.
 
 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Marcus
 shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I agree,
 this wrapper is a good step forward. It's totally fine to continue
 on that path because it is obviously better and makes it easy to
 switch to autodetection anytime later by simply adding the
 annotation. Sorry if I got a bit passionate about that, but as you
 mention I also get tired of adding things in multiple places, and
 the annotations have worked well in the API and provide a good
 model to emulate for consistency.
 
 I can't share code, because these extensions to
 LibvirtComputingResource that I've provided for other companies
 have not been open sourced. I can speak more generically though
 about methods.
 
 To answer question a, reflection allows you to do something
 like:
 
 Reflections reflections = new
 Reflections(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper); 
 SetClass? extends CommandWrapper wrappers =
 reflections.getSubTypesOf(CommandWrapper.class);
 
 So here in new Reflections we are automatically filtering for
 just the wrappers that would apply to the KVM plugin. Then to
 finish it off, you iterate through the wrappers and do:
 
 ResourceWrapper annotation =
 wrapper.getAnnotation(ResourceWrapper.class); 
 citrixCommands.put(annotation.handles(), wrapper.newInstance());
 
 Sorry, I guess that's four lines, plus the relevant for loop. And
 probably a null check or something for the annotation. You also
 have to add the annotation class itself, and add a line for the
 annotation in each wrapper, but in the end when we add new
 Commands, we won't have to touch anything but the new class that
 handles the command.
 
 
 public @interface ResourceWrapper {
 
 Class? extends Command handles();
 
 }
 
 There's an example of something similar to this in
 KVMStoragePoolManager.java (annotation is StoragePoolInfo.java).
 This example has actually been adapted from that. Also to a lesser
 extent in the API server, but it is spread across a bunch of
 classes.
 
 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
 wrote: Hi Marcus,
 
 Thanks for the email… I’m always in for improvements. But why can’t
 you share the code?
 
 Few points below:
 
 1. I added an subclassing example of LibvirtComputingResource
 because you mentioned it in a previous email:
 
 On 23 Apr 2015, at 17:26, Marcus
 shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I mentioned the reflection model because that's how I tend to
 handle the commands when subclassing LibvirtComputingResource.
 
 2. Current situation with LibvirtComputingResource on Master is:
 
 a. 67 IFs b. 67 private/protected methods that are used only there 
 c. If a new Command is added it means we will have a new IF and a
 new private method e. Maintenance is hell, test is close to zero
 and code quality is below expectations
 
 That being said, the main idea with the refactor is to change
 structure only, not behaviour. So what I’m doing is to simply move
 the code out the LibvirtCompRes and write tests for it, keeping the
 behaviour the same - to be done in a next phase. If you look at the
 changes you will see that some wrappers are already 100% covered.
 However, some others have 4% or 8% (not that much though). I would
 like to refactor that as well, but that could change behaviour
 (mentioned above) which I don’t want to touch now.
 
 3. With the new situation:
 
 a. No IFs b. All methods wrapped by other classes (command
 wrappers) - loosely coupled, easier to test and maintain c. If a
 new Command is added we would have to add a command wrapper and 1
 line in the request wrapper implementation ( I know, it hurts you a
 bit) - but please bear with me for the good news.
 
 4. the warnings are due to that: HashtableClass?

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: findbugs: deal with all the encoding issu...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/467#issuecomment-120524298
  
yes this is on master. is there doubt?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.5.2 open issues remaining

I have only moved those that had been moved several times and had no
activity in between.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

Thanks for the effort Daan. Though, by removing the fix version it will
be harder to search issues that need to be fixed on 4.5.2 etc.

On 09-Jul-2015, at 3:50 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?
jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.5.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20ASC
--
Daan

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue

M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services

IaaS Cloud Design Build
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software Engineering
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

--
Daan

Re: Can we use components based on MIT License?

The link in Rafael's answer contains a list of allowed licenses. MIT is in
the list.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:


 On 16-Jun-2015, at 5:23 am, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 General question, can we add/use components based on MIT License?


  cc Sebastien/David - just to be sure

  I think so, we’re already using jquery. See NOTICE file for details.


 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue




 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




  Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
 services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.




-- 
Daan

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: findbugs: deal with all the encoding issu...