from:"Vadim Kimlaychuk"

Re: Feedback of my Phd work in Cloudstack Project

2015-12-10 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Do I understand correctly that purpose of this work is to find tightly 
coupled classes automatically in order to inverse dependency later on?


Vadim.

On 2015-12-10 01:31, Igor Wiese wrote:


Hi, Cloudstack Community.

My name is Igor Wiese, phd Student from Brazil. In my research, I am
investigating two important questions: What makes two files change
together? Can we predict when they are going to co-change again?

I've tried to investigate this question on the Cloudstack project. I've
collected data from issue reports, discussions and commits and using 
some

machine learning techniques to build a prediction model.

I collected a total of 141 commits in which a pair of files changed
together and could correctly predict 60% commits. These were the most
useful information for predicting co-changes of files:

- sum of number of lines of code added, modified and removed,

- number of words used to describe and discuss the issues,

- number of comments in each issue,

- median value of closeness, a social network measure obtained from 
issue

comments, and

- median value of constraint, a social network measure obtained from 
issue

comments.

To illustrate, consider the following example from our analysis. For
release 4.4, the files "cloud/hypervisor/XenServerGuru.java" and
"cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java " changed together in 3 commits. 
In

another 2 commits, only the first file changed, but not the second.
Collecting contextual information for each commit made to first file in 
the
previous release (4.3), we were able to predict all 3 commits in which 
both

files changed together in release 4.4, and we only issued 0 false
positives. For this pair of files, the most important contextual
information was the number of lines of code added, removed and modified 
in

each commit,the number of comments in each issue, and social network
measures (closeness, density, constraint, hierarchy) obtained from 
issue

comments.

- Do these results surprise you? Can you think in any explanation for 
the

results?

- Do you think that our rate of prediction is good enough to be used 
for

building tool support for the software community?

- Do you have any suggestion on what can be done to improve the change
recommendation?

You can visit our webpage to inspect the results in details:
http://flosscoach.com/index.php/17-cochanges/67-cloudstack [1]

All the best,
Igor Wiese
Phd Candidate




Links:
--
[1] http://flosscoach.com/index.php/17-cochanges/67-cloudstack

Re: Lists admin, please unsubscribe/remove andrewlore...@gmx.com

2015-12-09 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk


I see them as well. When posting.

Sebastian, may be you have good spam-filter and they went into junk 
automatically? :)


Vadim.

On 2015-12-09 11:43, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:


That's weird, I am not seeing any bounced messages.

@David, might be able to do it

Otherwise @Nux can you file a JIRA with Infra ?

thanks


On Dec 8, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Nux!  wrote:

Hi,

Whoever is list admin, please remove andrewlore...@gmx.com from the 
user/dev MLs, his inbox has reached quota and it's generating 
bouncebacks.

This has been going on for a while, at least a few weeks.

Thanks!

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro [1]




Links:
--
[1] http://www.nux.ro

Re: What SDN are you using?

2015-11-30 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

I don't know if applicable, but I had very good impression from VyOS 
(http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page).


Vadim.

On 2015-11-29 20:56, Nux! wrote:


Hello,

So besides the folks using Nicira, can anyone recommend any other SDN 
thing or should I stay with v(x)lans?
I'm kind of removed from this side of things since my deployments tend 
to be with Security Grups in a single or few VLANs, any suggestions 
welcome, preferably free/foss.


Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro [1]




Links:
--
[1] http://www.nux.ro

Re: What SDN are you using?

2015-11-30 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

We mostly use it as external (to Cloudstack) intelligent switch/router, 
but also installed it as guest VM within cloud to provide customized SDN 
functionality.


Vadim.

On 2015-11-30 13:10, Nux! wrote:


Hello Vadim,

How exactly are you integrating VyOS in Cloudstack? We're also using it 
internally, but not sure how it would help us, especially with regards 
to SDN.


Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro [1]

- Original Message -


From: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <va...@kickcloud.net>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
Sent: Monday, 30 November, 2015 11:09:18
Subject: Re: What SDN are you using?


We have been using it at our DEV cloud around year ago. Now we are out
or resources so dev- environment is destroyed.

Vadim.

On 2015-11-30 12:24, Frank Louwers wrote:

Hi Vadim,

Are you using VyOS in a Cloudstack environment?

On 30 Nov 2015, at 11:20, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:

I don't know if applicable, but I had very good impression from VyOS
(http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page [2] [1 [2]]).

Vadim.

On 2015-11-29 20:56, Nux! wrote:

Hello,
So besides the folks using Nicira, can anyone recommend any other SDN
thing or should I stay with v(x)lans?
I'm kind of removed from this side of things since my deployments tend
to be with Security Grups in a single or few VLANs, any suggestions
welcome, preferably free/foss.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro [1] [2 [1]] [1 [2]]

Links:
--
[1] http://www.nux.ro [1] [2 [1]]

Links:
--
[1] http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page [2]
[2] http://www.nux.ro [1]




Links:
--
[1] http://www.nux.ro
[2] http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page

Re: What SDN are you using?

2015-11-30 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

We have been using it at our DEV cloud around year ago. Now we are out 
or resources so dev- environment is destroyed.


Vadim.

On 2015-11-30 12:24, Frank Louwers wrote:


Hi Vadim,

Are you using VyOS in a Cloudstack environment?

On 30 Nov 2015, at 11:20, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:

I don't know if applicable, but I had very good impression from VyOS 
(http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page [1]).


Vadim.

On 2015-11-29 20:56, Nux! wrote:

Hello,
So besides the folks using Nicira, can anyone recommend any other SDN 
thing or should I stay with v(x)lans?
I'm kind of removed from this side of things since my deployments tend 
to be with Security Grups in a single or few VLANs, any suggestions 
welcome, preferably free/foss.

Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro [2] [1 [2]]

Links:
--
[1] http://www.nux.ro [2]




Links:
--
[1] http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page
[2] http://www.nux.ro

Re: UI customization

2015-11-09 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

From my opinion better way is to write a plugin: 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/plugins.html#how-to-write-a-plugin-overview 
and follow UI customization guide: 
http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/38315-102-714564/CloudPlatform_4.5_User_Interface_Customization.pdf


Doing direct changes to cloudStack.js that are not contributed back to 
community is guaranteed way to have problems after updates. You will 
have to merge your code with mainstream all the time.


Another way is to implement your own interface based on CS REST API. 
Doing that for just 1 button is overkill for sure, but such changes will 
never end as soon as you start to customize. Think about it. The easiest 
way is not always the best one.


Vadim.

On 2015-11-09 13:58, Kshitij Kansal wrote:


Hi,

You can find the scripts at the location
"client/target/generated-webapp/scripts/". Make changes to 
cloudstack.js

here.

*Note: *First remove the corresponding gz file(in your case
cloudstack.js.gz) otherwise the changes won't reflect.

*The changes in generated-webapps are not saved and tracked in git. So 
make
sure to copy your changes to actual scripts (in ui/scripts) before 
finally
rebuilding the project. *The changes made this way are directly 
reflected

by refreshing the page.

PS: Not sure if its the correct way to develop but it works :). Once 
again,
make sure to copy your changes back to correct scripts before building 
the

project.

Regards,
Kshitij

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Wei ZHOU  
wrote:


I guess you worked on old version before.
in 4.6, something changed. you might compress cloudStack.js to get
cloudStack.js.gz as well.

2015-11-08 15:05 GMT+01:00 Илья Толстихин :

Hi all,

Could please help with the process of UI customization:

I have CloudStack 4.6.0 built from the source.
I want to add a custom button to the WebUI menu.
In file ui/scripts/cloudStack.js I added my button into sections array

*sections: {*
* /***
* * Dashboard*
* */*
* dashboard: {},*
* instances: {},*
* affinityGroups: {},*
* storage: {},*
* network: {},*
* templates: {},*
* events: {},*
* projects: {},*
* accounts: {},*

* domains: {}, //domain-admin and root-admin only*

* regions: {}, //root-admin only*
* system: {}, //root-admin only*
* 'global-settings': {}, //root-admin only*
* configuration: {}, //root-admin only*
* plugins: {},*
* test: {*
* title: 'TestSection',*
* id: 'TestSection',*
* show: function(args){*
* var div = document.createElement('div');*
* div.innerHTML = "Test section";*
* return div;*
* }*
* }*
* }*

and in sectionPreFilter array

*sectionPreFilter: function(args) {*
* var sections = [];*

* if (isAdmin()) {*
* sections = ["dashboard", "instances", "storage",
"network", "templates", "accounts", "domains", "events", "system",
"global-settings", "configuration", "projects", "regions",
"affinityGroups", "test"];*

After building the project, the button was added to the menu, but when 
I

edit cloudStack.js and restart jetty UI doesn't change, any changes are
applied only after the full project rebuild with command mvn
-Pdeveloper,systemvm -DskipTests clean install.
Jetty version 6.1.26

How to apply changes without rebuilding project?
And is it possible to apply it without restart Jetty?

Re: Service Offering documentation

2015-10-27 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Dear Ron,

I suggest you to read this document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs
[1]. I have tested pass-through mode with XenServer 6.2 and can give
probably a bit more information if you need. The reference document is
good indeed, so you probably do not need my comments :)

Regards,

Vadim.

On 2015-⁠10-⁠26 22:47, Ron Wheeler wrote:

The GPU section on page
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[2] [1 [2]] seems to be lacking some information (at least as far as I
can tell).
1) What does the GPU do? It says to select a card that I want to use.
No hint about the basis on which I should make the selection or if
there are any restrictions on the choice (based on hardware?)
2) It mentions support for 2 NVIDIA cards and says that if you want to
use another card "make the createServiceOffering API call". How is this
done on a UI screen?
3) The Type selection is worded in an odd way with 3 selections
explicitly named and a "so on" thrown in. Then it goes on to talk about
a passthrough vGPU type in a separate paragraph.

Perhaps there should be links to external web sites to clarify the
definitions of these cards and types.

If someone can explain what this section actually means, I will try to
write it in a clearer fashion.

Ron

Links:
-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠
[1]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[2]

Links:
--
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs
[2]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html

Re: Service Offering documentation

2015-10-27 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Dear Ron,

I suggest you to read this document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs.
I have tested pass-through mode with XenServer 6.2 and can give probably
a bit more information if you need. The reference document is good
indeed, so you probably do not need my comments :)

Regards,

Vadim.

On 2015-10-26 22:47, Ron Wheeler wrote:

The GPU section on page
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[1] seems to be lacking some information (at least as far as I can
tell).
1) What does the GPU do? It says to select a card that I want to use.
No hint about the basis on which I should make the selection or if
there are any restrictions on the choice (based on hardware?)
2) It mentions support for 2 NVIDIA cards and says that if you want to
use another card "make the createServiceOffering API call". How is this
done on a UI screen?
3) The Type selection is worded in an odd way with 3 selections
explicitly named and a "so on" thrown in. Then it goes on to talk about
a passthrough vGPU type in a separate paragraph.

Perhaps there should be links to external web sites to clarify the
definitions of these cards and types.

If someone can explain what this section actually means, I will try to
write it in a clearer fashion.

Ron

Links:
--
[1]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html

Re: Service Offering documentation - GPU

2015-10-27 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

New vGPU types K160Q, K180Q, K280Q were added to UI at 4.5 version, but
this is already reflected in the cwiki article.

Vadim.

On 2015-10-27 14:50, Ron Wheeler wrote:

Looks very complete and seems to answer many of my questions (and
probably some that I have not thought of yet).

This is in the 4.4 Design docs but did not make it into the 4.5 Design
docs section.

Should it be in 4.5 as well?

Ron

On 27/⁠10/⁠2015 3:53 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: Dear Ron,

Regards,

Vadim.

On 2015-⁠10-⁠26 22:47, Ron Wheeler wrote:

Perhaps there should be links to external web sites to clarify the
definitions of these cards and types.

If someone can explain what this section actually means, I will try to
write it in a clearer fashion.

Ron

Links:
-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠
[1]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[2]

Re: Service Offering documentation - GPU

2015-10-27 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

I don't know what is a best way to present such kind of information.
From one side each version should contain its own copy of the chapter,
but this is probably hard to maintain. From the other side - having just
one wiki document with history of versions is probably simpler.

Vadim.

On 2015-10-27 15:29, Ron Wheeler wrote:

My question was whether this page needs to be in the 4.5 Design docs.

Currently the new GPU types are in the 4.4 Design Docs which you seem
to be saying is wrong (K160Q, K180Q, K280Q were added to 4.5 not 4.4)

It looks like someone updated the 4.4 docs rather than adding the page
to the 4.5 doc set.

If I am not mistaken, the current 4.4 page should be copied to 4.5 and
then the changes made to the 4.4 page should be reverted to an earlier
version where the new GPUs are not included.

Ron

On 27/⁠10/⁠2015 9:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: New vGPU types K160Q,
K180Q, K280Q were added to UI at 4.5 version, but this is already
reflected in the cwiki article.

Vadim.

On 2015-⁠10-⁠27 14:50, Ron Wheeler wrote:

Looks very complete and seems to answer many of my questions (and
probably some that I have not thought of yet).

This is in the 4.4 Design docs but did not make it into the 4.5 Design
docs section.

Should it be in 4.5 as well?

Ron

On 27/⁠⁠10/⁠⁠2015 3:53 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: Dear Ron,

I suggest you to read this document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs
[1] [1 [1]]. I have tested pass-through mode with XenServer 6.2 and can
give probably a bit more information if you need. The reference
document is good indeed, so you probably do not need my comments :)

Regards,

Vadim.

On 2015-⁠⁠10-⁠⁠26 22:47, Ron Wheeler wrote:

The GPU section on page
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[2] [2 [2]] [1 [2]] seems to be lacking some information (at least as
far as I can tell).
1) What does the GPU do? It says to select a card that I want to use.
No hint about the basis on which I should make the selection or if
there are any restrictions on the choice (based on hardware?)
2) It mentions support for 2 NVIDIA cards and says that if you want to
use another card "make the createServiceOffering API call". How is this
done on a UI screen?
3) The Type selection is worded in an odd way with 3 selections
explicitly named and a "so on" thrown in. Then it goes on to talk about
a passthrough vGPU type in a separate paragraph.

Perhaps there should be links to external web sites to clarify the
definitions of these cards and types.

If someone can explain what this section actually means, I will try to
write it in a clearer fashion.

Ron

Links:
-⁠⁠-⁠⁠-⁠⁠-⁠⁠-⁠⁠-⁠⁠
[1]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[2] [2 [2]]

Links:
-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠-⁠
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs
[1]
[2]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.5/service_offerings.html
[2]

Re: Doubt about xen-pv-drv-iso

2015-10-08 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk


On 2015-10-08 10:52, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:

 Hello Rafael,

  I have done it : ACS 4.5.2, XenServer 6.5 SP1 -- no problems with 
that. I can see .msi and .exe programs in root and Linux folder.


 Vadim.


On 2015-10-08 05:17, Rafael Weingärtner wrote:


Hi folks,
I was debugging a problem today, and I hit something kind of weird.
Can somebody test something to me?

Can someone out there that has an ACS environment with Xenserver hosts 
try
to plug the xen-pv-drv-iso into an instance and try to use it? I mean, 
try

to mount and list the contents of that ISO. Did that work for you?

Re: Dynamic Scalable Template issue

2015-09-09 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk


Todd,

   Have you tried to do the following manual tests on the cluster 
where you have problem:

1. Dynamically scalable with CentOS ?
2. Dynamically scalable with Windows ?

   What do they show as available RAM?

Regards,

On 2015-09-08 19:44, Todd Pigram wrote:


Vadium,

After installing XS62ESP1028 via CLI (no reboot on hosts yet) and 
building an Centos65 instance w/o 'Dynamic Scalable' option checked, it 
showed right in XenCenter. I installed the new tools from (XS62ESP1028) 
and still good. I created a template from this instance. Deployed said 
template, and the memory is still good in XenCenter.


I tested on a Windows VM and it is the same with the new tools, 
however, as this particular tenant bypasses the virtual router, I have 
to reboot twice and reset networking as the new XenTools reset the 
networking stack.


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram [1]
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ [2] @pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 [3] Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key [4]

On Sep 6, 2015, at 4:57 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> 
wrote:

Todd,

Can you try Linux template with same dynamic scale option on the same 
pool? I wonder if there is a problem with Windows or any guest OS.


Regards,

Vadim.

On 2015-09-05 21:04, Todd Pigram wrote:

Vadium
That makes sense. I will see if I can replicate the issue in a lab. But 
given the holiday weekend, might not be until next week
On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> 
wrote:

Todd,
I have seeing similar problem with Xen 4.1 (not XenServer). Linux 
guests were able to see (and use) entire host resources on any guest 
VM. That was a bug of configuration. If you think about what could be 
different after CS update - it could be VM registration procedure. 
Still guest VM should not be able to see static max. Your XenCenter 
shows that effective dynamic VM memory size is 8Gb while maximium is 
32Gb. So CS configured VM guest correctly. This is problem of 
hypervisor <-> guest VM communitcation. That is why I asked you to try 
to register VM manually. I believe you will have the same result. Than 
means your server pool of XS62ESP1027 is broken. 3 other pools are not. 
I see no reason to update to 4.5.1, because I think this is not the 
problem of CS, but particularly this XenServer pool + this type of 
Windows guest (if other templates with dynamic offer are good).

Vadim.
On 2015-09-05 14:45, Todd Pigram wrote:
Vadim
I have 3 other pools (1 XS6.2sp1 and 2x xs65sp1) I have no issue with 
these.
Based on the Design doc, what i was experiencing is by design. Ok I 
will turn it off.
But now my question is, why on 4.3 I didn't have this issue but after 
installing 4.3.0.2 it changed.
Was 4.3 broken or is 4.3.0.2? Will upgrading to CCP 4.5.1 will be 
better?
If this is truely by design, I will not be able to use dynamic scalable 
for my windows instances
On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> 
wrote:

Todd,
You may try to create VM at XenServer without CloudStack just using XE 
tool (or XenCenter). If your manually created VM with static max <> 
dynamic max will be OK, then there is a problem with Cloudstack.

Vadim.
On 2015-09-04 21:51, Todd Pigram wrote:
Latest as of XS62ESP1027. I know XS62ESP1028 comes with new XenTools.
On Friday, September 4, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> 
wrote:

I am afraid this issue has nothing to do with Cloudstack. If VM "sees"
maximum memory size available instead of effective -- this is problem 
of
hypervisor and/or guest utilities. Do you have guest utilities that 
come

with XenServer version or older in your template?
Vadim.
On 2015-09-04 19:34, Todd Pigram wrote:
Ok. After rebooting the instance still no change after disabling 
globally. I modified all my templates to remove 'Dynamic Scalable', 
then I have to
shutdown every instance and unselect 'Dynamic Scalable', then restart 
for

it to be correct.
This may need to be looked at closer for a Windows/XenDesktop(XenApp)
environment as MS SQL will consume all the RAM windows sees.
My other question is why CCP 4.3 (which is certified for Citrix Ready 
for
IaaS for XD) didn't have this issue until I upgraded to 4.3.0.2 in 
July.

This feature was released in 4.2.
Thanks for all the help.
Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram [1] [1] [1] [1] [1 [1]] 
<http://about.me/ToddPigram [1] [1] [1] [1 [1]] [5]>

www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ [2] [2] [2] [2] [2 [2]] <
http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ [2] [2] [2] [2] [2 [2]]>
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 [3] [3] [3] [3] [3 [3]] <
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 [3] [3] [3] [3] [3 [3]]>
Mobile - 216-224-5769
PGP Public Key <
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB [4] [4] 
[4] [4] [4 [5]]> On

Sep 4, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Todd Pigram <t...@toddpigram.com> wrote:
Th

CS 4.5.2: all hosts reboot after 3 days at production

2015-09-07 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk


Hello all,

I have experienced accidental cluster reboot 3 days after update 
to CS 4.5.2. Cluster is XenServer 6.5 with SP1. Reboot has been started 
from slave node and then - master.

Syslog on slave shows only this:

Sep  6 00:47:05 xcp2 last message repeated 3 times
Sep  6 00:47:15 xcp2 xenstored:  D12  write 
data/meminfo_free 713732
Sep  6 00:47:15 xcp2 xenstored:  A1564203 w event   
/local/domain/12/data/meminfo_free /local/domain/12/data/meminfo_free
Sep  6 00:47:15 xcp2 xenstored:  D12  write data/updated Sun 
Sep  6 00:48:55 EEST 2015
Sep  6 00:47:15 xcp2 xenstored:  A6   w event   
/local/domain/12/data/updated /local/domain/12/data/updated
Sep  6 00:47:15 xcp2 xenstored:  A10  w event   
/local/domain/12/data/updated /local/domain/12/data/updated
Sep  6 00:47:26 xcp2 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on xenbr0 to 172.17.0.1 port 
67 (xid=0x304ae9dc)
Sep  6 00:47:27 xcp2 xapi: [ info|xcp2|462044 INET 
0.0.0.0:80|dispatch:host.call_plugin D:7593b578fada|taskhelper] task 
host.call_plugin R:ddd3cc399f86 forwarded 
(trackid=407f6adaa118a34f19eb1e29cd68a0e8)
Sep  6 00:47:36 xcp2 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on xenbr0 to 172.17.0.1 port 
67 (xid=0x304ae9dc)

Sep  6 00:48:18 xcp2 last message repeated 4 times
Sep  6 00:48:25 xcp2 xenstored:  D1   write 
data/meminfo_free 1740496
Sep  6 00:48:25 xcp2 xenstored:  A1564203 w event   
/local/domain/1/data/meminfo_free /local/domain/1/data/meminfo_free
Sep  6 00:48:25 xcp2 xenstored:  D1   write data/updated Sat 
Sep  5 21:50:07 EEST 2015
Sep  6 00:48:25 xcp2 xenstored:  A6   w event   
/local/domain/1/data/updated /local/domain/1/data/updated
Sep  6 00:48:25 xcp2 xenstored:  A10  w event   
/local/domain/1/data/updated /local/domain/1/data/updated
Sep  6 00:48:26 xcp2 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on xenbr0 to 172.17.0.1 port 
67 (xid=0x304ae9dc)
Sep  6 00:48:27 xcp2 xapi: [ info|xcp2|462044 INET 
0.0.0.0:80|dispatch:host.call_plugin D:f2c8987bc0ff|taskhelper] task 
host.call_plugin R:b62d2d4f58eb forwarded 
(trackid=e3d4ea00c96194830a7dbbfc35563a3c)
Sep  6 00:48:38 xcp2 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on xenbr0 to 172.17.0.1 port 
67 (xid=0x304ae9dc)

Sep 06 00:48:48 xcp2 syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
Sep  6 00:48:48 xcp2 kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg 
started.
Sep  6 00:48:48 xcp2 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys 
cpuset
Sep  6 00:48:48 xcp2 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys 
cpu
Sep  6 00:48:48 xcp2 kernel: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys 
cpuacct

Sep  6 00:48:48 xcp2 kernel: [0.00] Linux version 3.10.0+2

   Can anyone help with diagnostics ?

Thank you,

Vadim.

VHD root disks and VM start-up process at XenServer

2015-06-11 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Hello friends,

I would like to understand how CloudStack creates/runs VM on 
XenServer host?  What source files contain process of VM start-up?
I want to repeat this process manually on dedicated host, but it 
seems XAPI does not work with VHD disk images.  I can’t start VM from existing 
VHD file manually. Converting it to XVA is not the case I suppose.

I have tried to create empty VM from XenServer template and replace 
root disk by my VHD file, but VM fails to start-up. Who can shed the light on 
this process?

Thanks,

Vadim Kimlaychuk

RE: refresh browser - logged out from ACS ?

2015-05-27 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Is it possible to fix? It seems such a behaviour was always be like this.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: refresh browser - logged out from ACS ?

openign a new windows/tab with same address/URL also break things...

On 27 May 2015 at 11:11, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote:

 Agreed, I thought it was on opening a new window (maybe a new tab 
 too?) rather than refresh. But maybe refresh broke too as a side effect.

 --
 Stephen Turner

 -Original Message-
 From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 27 May 2015 04:28
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: refresh browser - logged out from ACS ?

 But it was not refresh - to best of my recollection..

 On 5/26/15 8:27 PM, ilya wrote:
  I vaguely recall Rohit mentioned it was some sort of security fix 
  that was causing this side effect due to the way sessionids were handled..

  On 5/26/15 8:15 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
  Thx Rafael, as usuall :)

  I remember there was some thread on this topic, but cant really 
  find it...

  On 26 May 2015 at 17:14, Rafael Fonseca rsafons...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi Andrija,

  I noticed the same is also happening on the 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT .. it's 
  a bit annoying.

  I'll have a closer look later today if i can find the time for it 
  :)

  On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Andrija Panic 
  andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  Hi guys,

  just wondering - when I refresh browser/UI I get logged out of 
  ACS
  -
  4.4.3
  (testing with 4.5.1 in few minutes...).

  I remember there was some thread on this, but can't really find 
  it
  anywhere
  This behaviour is not present in 4.3 and prior AFAIK.

  Any tips ?
  --

  Andrija Panić

-- 

Andrija Panić

RE: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8231: fixed merge conflicts wi...

2015-05-26 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Rohit,

I have merged my local branch with master and resolved conflicts.  Pull 
request showed modifications that I have made precisely. But when I created the 
request it contains multiple files (not just those I have changed). Please 
review this. I think I have done something wrong again.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: vadimkim [mailto:g...@git.apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8231: fixed merge 
conflicts wi...

GitHub user vadimkim opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/302

CLOUDSTACK-8231: fixed merge conflicts with previous patch

We need to port this update to 4.5 branch as well.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/vadimkim/cloudstack master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/302.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at 
least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #302


commit 7ee9b1042f35a2998217d973b5ee447ca68497fb
Author: Vadim Kimlaychuk va...@ant.ee
Date:   2015-05-20T19:08:29Z

CLOUDSTACK-8231: Fixed UI empty drop-down list for LB rules

commit a064911d440170185b69001deb28b8b2173b4d05
Author: Vadim Kimlaychuk va...@ant.ee
Date:   2015-05-21T07:18:41Z

CLOUDSTACK-8231: fixed call to getLbAlgorithms() function in order to merge 
results from static and dynamic data

commit 7abf21f9c8a80dd9bf42c564f9eb56f0a6f9d7cf
Author: Vadim Kimlaychuk va...@ant.ee
Date:   2015-05-21T07:44:20Z

CLOUDSTACK-8231: reverted 7ee9b1042 commit logic

commit ff31d1f20bc2ef05c82ab10556ee8cf274a39a84
Author: Vadim Kimlaychuk va...@ant.ee
Date:   2015-05-26T09:06:27Z

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'

Conflicts:
ui/scripts/network.js




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your 
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature 
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please 
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with 
INFRA.
---

[WWW] Cloudstack 4.5 repo for Ubuntu trusty Packages file = 0

2015-05-19 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Hello,

There is a mistake in official 4.5.1 distribution. According to 
documentation update should be done from:

deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu precise 
4http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu%20precise%204.5

If you go there you’ll find that primary file has 0 length

Packages   2015-04-30 12:23   0

Ubuntu users can’t update, because there is no packages specified.

Shapeblue repo works good.

Regards,

Vadim

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Geoff,

Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have 
(for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers have to 
communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world.  The 
easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need 
to send all the requests to VPC router. Don't know if it does any benefit in a 
term of VR load.   I do agree that isolation model of VPC is more strict and 
clean.  Prevents from such backdors to happen.  I just got wrong feeling, 
that such scenario is also supported, because it works unless I reboot.  I also 
agree with your comments and will not consider this as an issue anymore.  Thank 
you for detailed explaination - this is what I have been looking for.   I have 
no issues for 4.5.1 to happen.

Regards,

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. 
Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com:

 Hi Vadim,

 My first question is why would you want to?

 The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and 
 use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.

 However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by 
 taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC 
 to each VM on the other tier.

 It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and 
 both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.

 However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for 
 each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.

 Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my 
 opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the 
 VMs on each Tier.

 If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs 
 then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or 
 shared network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested 
 again on
 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs 
 to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.

 Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see 
 this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported 
 configuration in the first place.

 Regards

 Geoff Higginbottom

 D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
 Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

 I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
 that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
 troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but 
 don't know where to start.

 Vadim.

 -Original Message-
 From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1


 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
 vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,


 Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
 The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and 
 help test This is very important .

  but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 
  4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
 production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs 
 from different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem 
 desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario
 

 Did you report bugs ?

  Regards,
 
  Vadim.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
 
  I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
 
  I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv 
  XenServer
 build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and 
 VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
 
  We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a 
  -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc 
  hence the -0 for now
 
  Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security
 Groups build, in for a busy week!
 
  Regards
 
  Geoff Higginbottom
  CTO / Cloud Architect
 
  D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
  tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that 
it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to 
troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know 
where to start.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1


On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote:

 Hi,
 
   I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,


Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. 
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test 
This is very important .

 but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at 
 production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from 
 different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at 
 user list under subject VPC usage scenario
 

Did you report bugs ? 

 Regards,
 
 Vadim.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
 
 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
 
 I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. 
  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded 
 OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
 
 We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, 
 but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence 
 the -0 for now
 
 Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
 build, in for a busy week!
 
 Regards
 
 Geoff Higginbottom
 CTO / Cloud Architect
 
 D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581
 
 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com 
 htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru 
 https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru
 
 ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS 
 x-apple-data-detectors://5
 
 
 
 
 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 +1 (binding)
 On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
 
 Thanks for running with this Rohit.
 
 +1 (binding)
 
 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
 vote:
 
 Git Branch and Commit SH:
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
 h=
 ref
 s/heads/4.5
 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
 
 List of changes:
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai
 n;
 f=C
 HANGES.md;hb=4.5
 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
 
 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
 location):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
 
 PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
 
 Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 
 For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
 indicate (binding) with their vote?
 
 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
 
 For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories 
 and location to download systemvm templates:
 
 http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
 http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
 
 Regards.
 
 
 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
 services
 
 IaaS Cloud Design  
 Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment 
 frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software 
 Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure 
 Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
 Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
 
 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
 its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
 believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
 incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
 incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
 Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

2015-05-06 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Hi,

I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it seems 
VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and 
using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers  at 
the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject 
VPC usage scenario

Regards,

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)

I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build.  
In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, 
however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.

We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it 
could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now

Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
build, in for a busy week!

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ 
| Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS 
x-apple-data-detectors://5




On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

+1 (binding)
On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:

 Thanks for running with this Rohit.

 +1 (binding)

 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
 
  Git Branch and Commit SH:
 

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
ref
s/heads/4.5
  Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
 
  List of changes:
 

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
f=C
HANGES.md;hb=4.5
  https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
 
  Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
  location):
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
 
  PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
 
  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 
  For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
  indicate (binding) with their vote?
 
  [ ] +1  approve
  [ ] +0  no opinion
  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
 
  For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories 
  and location to download systemvm templates:
 
  http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
  http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
 
  Regards.


Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Lucian (Nux)

2015-03-26 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Nux,  my best wishes to you ! 

Yours respectfully,

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 8:51 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Lucian (Nux)

Congratulations Lucian!

Regards

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 26 March 2015 04:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Lucian (Nux)

Congratulations!

On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked 
 Lucian to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

 Join me in congratulating Lucian!

 On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

 ~Rajani

--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working. 
Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the 
reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory 
snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user interface 
exists, but I didn't see it worked.

Vadim.


-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

Hi guys,

still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM 
?

We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me 
obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will).

Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents 
here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but 
any more input would be very much appriciated.

I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might have 
bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM missing 
features...

Any input greatly appreciated...

-- 

Andrija Panić

RE: root resize support in the UI

2014-12-01 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

I have done root partition resize under XenServer exactly as you described - 
resized drive and then using system tools on guest VM like fdisk, lvextend and 
ext2resize changed the size of the root.  It seems that drive resize on 
hypervisor level is all that is needed, because it is far too complicated for 
hypervisor to be aware of all different types of partition layouts and file 
systems that might exist. Then upper layer (like CS) may take role of 
implementing different actions according to guest type and file system that 
have being used for particular guest.  While OS type can be taken from 
template, FS type and partition type is information that is not stored in the 
database. Without it implementation is not feasible.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:02 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

I think it would be usefull to have that resize feature for all guests (Linux, 
Windows, etc) - but perhaps customizes the Resize function to perform partition 
resize inside Linux (if we are deploying new VM from Linux template) - or 
simply do not do anything inside guest OS, just resize the drive - and let the 
client handle partition and file system resize...it might be more clean 
implementation I guess...?

On 1 December 2014 at 08:48, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:

 It is interesting how, in genereal, this works for XenServer (for 
 exmaple)?  I do understand, that entire logic of CS is built around 
 hypervisor capabilities. It does not do more than each specific 
 hypervisor can offer. KVM do have virt-resize tool that can resize 
 Linux partitions, but it will probably not work for Windows hosts 
 anyway.  So, to be honest, this UI feature should only be visible for Linux 
 guests.

 I don't know whether different approach to build and resize root 
 partitions for all hypervisors exist?  If it is not possible to do on 
 hypervisor level, how does CS do this?

 Vadim.

 -Original Message-
 From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
 Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:03 PM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

 It's very possible Citrix customised that installation, what they do 
 for their own customers is their own business. It was certainly 
 possible to do it with 4.3, Marcus wrote some patches at some point to 
 enable this functionality (KVM only, again).

 The UI has always been considered more of a proof of concept, though 
 it's a very much needed part of ACS, as such everyone is encouraged to 
 use the API and build their own interfaces. I missed some important 
 options and customers because I thought

 GreenQloud, Exoscale etc will give you some credit as a new customer 
 so you can check out their UI. They don't have as many options as the 
 ACS one, but I found this to be a feature, customers shouldn't be 
 exposed to too many options, they'll just get their noses caught in 
 them. :)

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Sunday, 30 November, 2014 10:53:56
  Subject: RE: root resize support in the UI

  Lucian,
 
I have seen CS 4.3 installation made by Citrix at our parnter 
  and
 they have the
same feature enabled for XenServer and VmWare.  I wonder how 
  does
 it work ?
They have their own team of developers to make some extra 
  features
 they need
(like plugin for statistics and billing), but did they 
  implement
 particularly
this feature or Citrix did it  -  I don't know. It seems this 
  part
 of code is
not contributed back to community anyway. It would be nice to 
  have
 it,
especially together with slieders which are quite popular 
  right
 now as I
understood.
 
  Vadim.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
  Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:48 PM
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
  Vadim,
 
  1. Only KVM for now, due to lack of interest I guess 2. The root 
  disk value needs to be equal or larger than that of the template, 
  otherwise you end up with a broken disk, obviously. So go for 
  minimal (say under
  10G) templates that can resize themselves, such as the ones at 
  http://dl.openvm.eu ;) 3. The backend API has been supporting this 
  since 4.4.0, it's the UI that is lagging behind More details here
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181
 
  Lucian
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 15:17:16
  Subject: RE: root resize support in the UI
 
  Nux

RE: root resize support in the UI

2014-12-01 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

But that means user can not create desired volume during instance set-up.  If 
we would like to have, for example, VM with disk offers from 5-100Gb I need to 
create dozen of same templates that differ only at root size. 

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:06 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

Exactly, there may be more than 1 partion on that 1 drive.. So just increase 
disk size, and let administaror handle the inside VM job

On 1 December 2014 at 09:34, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  
 vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
 wrote:

  I have done root partition resize under XenServer exactly as you
 described
  - resized drive and then using system tools on guest VM like fdisk, 
  lvextend and ext2resize changed the size of the root.  It seems that
 drive
  resize on hypervisor level is all that is needed, because it is far 
  too complicated for hypervisor to be aware of all different types of
 partition
  layouts and file systems that might exist. Then upper layer (like 
  CS) may take role of implementing different actions according to 
  guest type and file system that have being used for particular 
  guest.  While OS type can be taken from template, FS type and 
  partition type is information that is not stored in the database. Without 
  it implementation is not feasible.

 It's not given that you want to resize a partition or which one, just 
 because you resize the disk.

 Thus it's not feasible to assume that the orchestration layer should 
 be capable of doing it.

 --
 Erik

-- 

Andrija Panić

Cloudstack repos

2014-12-01 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Hello Dev-s

I am looking closer to the CS development process and if possible 
wish to contribute. I have found there are at least 2 repos for CS. One, I 
suppose, is official : git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git  another one is 
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack.git
Where does development take place? Are these 2 repos in sync with 
each other? Are there more repos where developers do their work? What is the 
purpose to have more of them ?

Thanks for expaination,

Vadim Kimlaychuk

RE: root resize support in the UI

2014-12-01 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Andrija,

You did understand me correctly. I wish that for the customer disk 
offer could be customizable. And not just for KVM hypervisor.  Particularly now 
I am interested in Xen and VmWare. 
CS admin should not have set of templates that differs only on root partition 
size.  Swap partition can be (theoretically) located as another DATA disk and 
be re-sizable with existing functionality.  
How hard is to achieve such a requirement? Are these requirements 
something unusual and I should do it other way? For example we say to the 
customer, that you have unallocated space if you select different size and 
extend partition by yourself?

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

Vadim, not sure if I understand corrrectly - but you have i.e. 10GB template. 
you provision new VM with different size i.e. 50GB, and then after the instance 
is UP and running - there is just 40GB of additional unalocated space inside 
VM/disk, so admin need to resize partition and resize FS... ?

I have been manually using qemu-img to resize some volumes (update the size 
inside DB) and then boot VM and do inside VM work of resizing stuff...

If we only increase disk by qemu-img and update the DB - than no more 
admin-manual hacks needed - and we have consistent solution, that works across 
all platforms.

And to support resize inside differente OS-es  by ACS (partitions and FS) - 
seems pretty impossible for me, except for basic templates that have 1 
partition, and i.e. no swap partition, etc...we loose consistency here 
completely...


On 1 December 2014 at 10:33, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:

 But that means user can not create desired volume during instance set-up.
 If we would like to have, for example, VM with disk offers from 
 5-100Gb I need to create dozen of same templates that differ only at root 
 size.

 Vadim.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:06 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

 Exactly, there may be more than 1 partion on that 1 drive.. So just 
 increase disk size, and let administaror handle the inside VM job

 On 1 December 2014 at 09:34, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:

  On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  
  vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
  wrote:
 
   I have done root partition resize under XenServer exactly as you
  described
   - resized drive and then using system tools on guest VM like 
   fdisk, lvextend and ext2resize changed the size of the root.  It 
   seems that
  drive
   resize on hypervisor level is all that is needed, because it is 
   far too complicated for hypervisor to be aware of all different 
   types of
  partition
   layouts and file systems that might exist. Then upper layer (like
   CS) may take role of implementing different actions according to 
   guest type and file system that have being used for particular 
   guest.  While OS type can be taken from template, FS type and 
   partition type is information that is not stored in the database.
 Without it implementation is not feasible.
  
 
  It's not given that you want to resize a partition or which one, 
  just because you resize the disk.
 
  Thus it's not feasible to assume that the orchestration layer should 
  be capable of doing it.
 
  --
  Erik
 



 --

 Andrija Panić




-- 

Andrija Panić

RE: Cloudstack repos

2014-12-01 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Thank you all ! Not it is clear 

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack repos

Hi ChunFeng,

I've updated the repository description here:
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack

I've update on the README file the links to official Repo and something about 
the Github mirror to avoid confusion, since there are so many Github forks 
anyone could host CloudStack repo with their github account.

I think people who are coming to Apache CloudStack would/should go to 
github.com/apache/cloudstack.

On Monday 01 December 2014 04:29 PM, ChunFeng wrote:
 Hi Rohit,

 For end user , even for developers , two repos may raise some mix-up.

 Could you please modify the README.md file in ShapeBlue's repo by add some 
 statements for explaination ?

 --
 Regards,

 ChunFeng

 -- Original --
 From:  Rohit Yadavrohit.ya...@shapeblue.com;
 Date:  Mon, Dec 1, 2014 07:05 PM
 To:  devdev@cloudstack.apache.org;

 Subject:  Re: Cloudstack repos

 Hi Vadim,

 The official repository is at
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git

 A mirror is available on Github which is more easy to work with, to 
 get started I would recommend you fork the Github repository, work on 
 it and pull/rebase using the above official repository, and send us 
 Github Pull Requests for any code contributions: 
 github.com/apache/cloudstack

 Our (ShapeBlue's) CloudStack repo on github is public for transparency 
 purposes and to host release notes and tags of our patches. We think 
 of our repo as a backup of CloudStack repository (that syncs faster 
 than the github mirror using a cronjob) and we also note in its 
 description that they should be considered as our backup only.

 On Monday 01 December 2014 03:42 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
 Hello Dev-s

   I am looking closer to the CS development process and if 
 possible wish to contribute. I have found there are at least 2 repos for CS. 
 One, I suppose, is official : git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git  another 
 one is https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack.git
   Where does development take place? Are these 2 repos in sync 
 with each other? Are there more repos where developers do their work? What 
 is the purpose to have more of them ?

   Thanks for expaination,

 Vadim Kimlaychuk

 --
 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue 
 and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  
 Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment 
 frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software 
 Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure 
 Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
 Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
 its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
 believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
 incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
 incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
 Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
 operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
 registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
 Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our 
range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software 
Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom

RE: root resize support in the UI

2014-11-30 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Lucian,

I have seen CS 4.3 installation made by Citrix at our parnter and they 
have the same feature enabled for XenServer and VmWare.  I wonder how does it 
work ?  
They have their own team of developers to make some extra features they 
need (like plugin for statistics and billing), but did they implement 
particularly this feature or Citrix did it  -  I don't know. It seems this part 
of code is not contributed back to community anyway. It would be nice to have 
it, especially together with slieders which are quite popular right now as I 
understood. 

Vadim. 

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

Vadim,

1. Only KVM for now, due to lack of interest I guess 2. The root disk value 
needs to be equal or larger than that of the template, otherwise you end up 
with a broken disk, obviously. So go for minimal (say under 10G) templates that 
can resize themselves, such as the ones at http://dl.openvm.eu ;) 3. The 
backend API has been supporting this since 4.4.0, it's the UI that is lagging 
behind More details here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 15:17:16
 Subject: RE: root resize support in the UI

 Nux,
 
 Can you give more information about this functionality? I am 
 particularly
 interesting to show to the user this field, but don't know how it 
 will work.
 Particularly is interesting:
 1. Does it work for all hypervisors or just KVM?
 2. Does it depend on the template root partition (i.e. I have 10G root 
 at template and put 5G to desired. Will it work?) 3. This is just UI 
 patch, shouldn't it be activated at the backend as well ?
 
 Thanks,
 Vadim
 
 From: Nux! [n...@li.nux.ro]
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 12:37
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
 BTW, the code needed to enable custom root size during instance 
 creation is very small, functionality is already there.
 This patch is needed
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=8f
 ec09ba481fbd3b8c2a9e4d31ef06f113b037cb
 , I tested it and it works fine.
 
 And this is the result: https://i.imgur.com/xrs0mu4.png
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:57:37
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
 Yes, you have a point.

 Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7992

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:48:03
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

 Well...I don't know...we kind of have features all over the place 
 that work for one hypervisor and not for another.

 If we're cool with that approach, this would be just one more area 
 where we have this kind of hypervisor-specific behavior (perhaps all 
 hypervisors support such an action in the future).

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Was thinking to just patch my local installation. Devs might not go 
 too crazy over this idea since root resize is not supported across 
 all hypervisors (KVM only atm).

 But if you think this has a chance to go official, I will open an issue.

 Thanks,
 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Brian Federle 
  brian.fede...@citrix.com
 
  Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:27:14
  Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

  Have you logged a JIRA ticket for this?
 
  Maybe Brian or one of the GUI people could pick up on it.
 
  On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
  Yeah, I was thinking of that, if it works for DATA, it should 
  work for ROOT. But I am not a dev.
 
  Thoughts?
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
   From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Friday, 28 November, 2014 19:57:27
   Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
   For root disks, is it possible to just follow the existing 
   resize
 pattern
   we have established in the UI for data disks?
  
   On Friday, November 28

RE: root resize support in the UI

2014-11-30 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

It is interesting how, in genereal, this works for XenServer (for exmaple)?  I 
do understand, that entire logic of CS is built around hypervisor capabilities. 
It does not do more than each specific hypervisor can offer. KVM do have 
virt-resize tool that can resize Linux partitions, but it will probably not 
work for Windows hosts anyway.  So, to be honest, this UI feature should only 
be visible for Linux guests. 

I don't know whether different approach to build and resize root partitions for 
all hypervisors exist?  If it is not possible to do on hypervisor level, how 
does CS do this?

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

It's very possible Citrix customised that installation, what they do for their 
own customers is their own business. It was certainly possible to do it with 
4.3, Marcus wrote some patches at some point to enable this functionality (KVM 
only, again).

The UI has always been considered more of a proof of concept, though it's a 
very much needed part of ACS, as such everyone is encouraged to use the API and 
build their own interfaces. I missed some important options and customers 
because I thought 

GreenQloud, Exoscale etc will give you some credit as a new customer so you can 
check out their UI. They don't have as many options as the ACS one, but I found 
this to be a feature, customers shouldn't be exposed to too many options, 
they'll just get their noses caught in them. :)

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Sunday, 30 November, 2014 10:53:56
 Subject: RE: root resize support in the UI

 Lucian,
 
   I have seen CS 4.3 installation made by Citrix at our parnter and they 
 have the
   same feature enabled for XenServer and VmWare.  I wonder how does it 
 work ?
   They have their own team of developers to make some extra features they 
 need
   (like plugin for statistics and billing), but did they implement 
 particularly
   this feature or Citrix did it  -  I don't know. It seems this part of 
 code is
   not contributed back to community anyway. It would be nice to have it,
   especially together with slieders which are quite popular right now 
 as I
   understood.
 
 Vadim.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:48 PM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
 Vadim,
 
 1. Only KVM for now, due to lack of interest I guess 2. The root disk 
 value needs to be equal or larger than that of the template, otherwise 
 you end up with a broken disk, obviously. So go for minimal (say under 
 10G) templates that can resize themselves, such as the ones at 
 http://dl.openvm.eu ;) 3. The backend API has been supporting this 
 since 4.4.0, it's the UI that is lagging behind More details here 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181
 
 Lucian
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 15:17:16
 Subject: RE: root resize support in the UI
 
 Nux,
 
 Can you give more information about this functionality? I am 
 particularly
 interesting to show to the user this field, but don't know how it 
 will work.
 Particularly is interesting:
 1. Does it work for all hypervisors or just KVM?
 2. Does it depend on the template root partition (i.e. I have 10G 
 root at template and put 5G to desired. Will it work?) 3. This is 
 just UI patch, shouldn't it be activated at the backend as well ?
 
 Thanks,
 Vadim
 
 From: Nux! [n...@li.nux.ro]
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 12:37
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
 BTW, the code needed to enable custom root size during instance 
 creation is very small, functionality is already there.
 This patch is needed
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=8
 f ec09ba481fbd3b8c2a9e4d31ef06f113b037cb
 , I tested it and it works fine.
 
 And this is the result: https://i.imgur.com/xrs0mu4.png
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:57:37
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
 Yes, you have a point.

 Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7992

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message

RE: root resize support in the UI

2014-11-29 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

Nux,

 Can you give more information about this functionality? I am 
particularly interesting to show to the user this field, but don't know how it 
will work. Particularly is interesting:
1. Does it work for all hypervisors or just KVM?
2. Does it depend on the template root partition (i.e. I have 10G root at 
template and put 5G to desired. Will it work?)
3. This is just UI patch, shouldn't it be activated at the backend as well ?

Thanks,
Vadim

From: Nux! [n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 12:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Brian Federle
Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

BTW, the code needed to enable custom root size during instance creation is 
very small, functionality is already there.
This patch is needed 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=8fec09ba481fbd3b8c2a9e4d31ef06f113b037cb
 , I tested it and it works fine.

And this is the result: https://i.imgur.com/xrs0mu4.png

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:57:37
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

 Yes, you have a point.

 Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7992

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
 Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:48:03
 Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

 Well...I don't know...we kind of have features all over the place that work
 for one hypervisor and not for another.

 If we're cool with that approach, this would be just one more area where we
 have this kind of hypervisor-specific behavior (perhaps all hypervisors
 support such an action in the future).

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Was thinking to just patch my local installation. Devs might not go too
 crazy over this idea since root resize is not supported across all
 hypervisors (KVM only atm).

 But if you think this has a chance to go official, I will open an issue.

 Thanks,
 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
 
  Sent: Saturday, 29 November, 2014 00:27:14
  Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI

  Have you logged a JIRA ticket for this?
 
  Maybe Brian or one of the GUI people could pick up on it.
 
  On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
  Yeah, I was thinking of that, if it works for DATA, it should work for
  ROOT. But I am not a dev.
 
  Thoughts?
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
   From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Friday, 28 November, 2014 19:57:27
   Subject: Re: root resize support in the UI
 
   For root disks, is it possible to just follow the existing resize
 pattern
   we have established in the UI for data disks?
  
   On Friday, November 28, 2014, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
  
   Hello,
  
   Wonder if someone can help me with the $subject.
  
   I remember at some point (4.2?) a new feature showed up accidentally
 in
   the UI instance creation dialogues, it was concerning root size,
 had a
   small box where the number in GB would be introduced.
   I'd like to take advantage of that now that this feature actually
 works,
   even if only in KVM. I'd love it if someone could point me to that
  piece of
   code (prolly just javascript).
  
   In addition to that, now that root resize works, can any one suggest
  how I
   might put a resize button in the Volumes section for the ROOT
 disks?
  
   Lucian
  
   --
   Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
  
   Nux!
   www.nux.ro
  
  
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
   http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
 
 
 
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
  http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*




 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
  http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*

RE: [DISCUSS] LTS Releases

2014-11-25 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk

I do prefer 4.4 as well because it has GPU sharing and we actively test it.  
Other bugs are not so important for us right now.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] LTS Releases

Daan,

I like 4.4 better than 4.3 for my use case and despite the bugs I hit it does 
its job.
If I were to deploy today it would still be with 4.4. Hope this makes you feel 
better. :-)

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 13:56:12
 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] LTS Releases

 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
 wrote:
 The 4.4 branch does not contain many bugfixes which are in 4.3 and on 
 master/4.5.

 That is worrying, Rohit. As the rest of your mail is already a vote of 
 distrust, this part says we should not release 4.4.2 as it contains 
 regressions. This is a very bad signal to users and the rest of the 
 community. What you are saying is (you in transitive form), 'we won't 
 port fixes to 4.4 but only to 4.3 so upgrade to newer 4.3 versions and 
 not to a 4.4 version. You have the right to do so but I don't like it.
 Fortunately, I met people at CCCEU stating that 4.4 was working 
 perfectly for them. Unfortunately an incompatibility seldom is just
 for- or backward. Most of the time it is two way. Will you support 
 transitioning from 4.4 to 4.5 as rigorously as you now discourage the 
 transition to 4.4? I think you will need to.

 --
 Daan

Re: Feedback of my Phd work in Cloudstack Project

Re: Lists admin, please unsubscribe/remove andrewlore...@gmx.com

Re: What SDN are you using?

Re: What SDN are you using?

Re: What SDN are you using?

Re: UI customization

Re: Service Offering documentation

Re: Service Offering documentation

Re: Service Offering documentation - GPU

Re: Service Offering documentation - GPU

Re: Doubt about xen-pv-drv-iso

Re: Dynamic Scalable Template issue

CS 4.5.2: all hosts reboot after 3 days at production

VHD root disks and VM start-up process at XenServer

RE: refresh browser - logged out from ACS ?

RE: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8231: fixed merge conflicts wi...

[WWW] Cloudstack 4.5 repo for Ubuntu trusty Packages file = 0

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Lucian (Nux)

RE: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

RE: root resize support in the UI

RE: root resize support in the UI

Cloudstack repos

RE: root resize support in the UI

RE: Cloudstack repos

RE: root resize support in the UI

RE: root resize support in the UI

RE: root resize support in the UI

RE: [DISCUSS] LTS Releases

31 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information