Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi I've tried again with my own RPMS this time and with the Jenkins systemvm template, but still no go. It seems like I will get randomly the local primary storage shown twice ... Rohit, have you had any luck with those logs? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 18:32:22 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, Here's the table you requested: http://fpaste.org/209313/53496142/raw/ And the old management logs - be advised they're ~3MB and may contain several upgrade procedures as I have not deleted the logs in between some of my tests: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-old-management-server.log Thanks! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 17:45:50 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, I’m still very much interested in your cloud.storage_pool table which should have two entries. Can you dig them up and share them (perhaps privately if it’s an issue for you) with me along with pre-upgrade logs? I’ll try again tomorrow, along with few other issues that I’ve identified. A recent change I’ve done is to use latest open-vm-tools from wheezy-backports (for vmware) and install xstools-6.5 on 4.5+ systemvms which should improve systemvm performance on xen and vmware hosts. On 10-Apr-2015, at 9:58 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Rohit, Thanks for your effort to test. This problem does not seem to affect VM lifecycle. I will repeat my tests on fresh installations, but I will have to postpone this until next week, with the Easter coming and all. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 08:59:39 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, I’ve tried to setup a similar environment and tried upgrading 4.4.1 (KVM+local storage) to 4.5.1 and I could not reproduce it even after two clean attempts. I read through the logs and the only local storage path I found was: 5da7e725-d33a-43f8-afc7-d0ee0741bdb3 (1707.cloud.priv). The logs you shared are only include things after the upgrade. Can you grep the logs before you did the upgrade searching for “/var/lib/libvirt/images” or any local storage related to hostname 1707.cloud.priv. Also, can you share the db results of: select * from cloud.storage_pool; Lastly, even if you see two local storage pools - does it cause failure of any normal vm lifecycle operations? On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Thanks a lot, Rohit, let's hope it'll be an easy one. What I've noticed happening is as you create instances, they will be spread among the 2 duplicate pools. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 16:51:34 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow and see if I can reproduce (and possibly fix) the issue. The repository I created and shared has exactly these two extra patches on top of 4.5.1 RC2: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6c5cf04d6242cd23cc1e7ea982529df9f27fcb1c (blocker) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1ef585f9e65e0854984211f11d5c2c7c2977a957 (ui fix) Regards. On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Marcus, I can't check if the guid has changed, but the upgrade was a normal one done using yum update from Rohit's el6 repo. To make things more confusing, 2 upgrades ended up with duplicated local storage, but my last test has not. I'll do a couple more tests today to see if the issue is consistent. I'll keep an eye on the guids. +1 what you said re bugfix releases. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 05:56:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or removed/installed? Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions. In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release, that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process. On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi Lucian, Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow and see if I can reproduce (and possibly fix) the issue. The repository I created and shared has exactly these two extra patches on top of 4.5.1 RC2: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6c5cf04d6242cd23cc1e7ea982529df9f27fcb1c (blocker) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1ef585f9e65e0854984211f11d5c2c7c2977a957 (ui fix) Regards. On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Awesome, will test shortly. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 10:26:37 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi all, I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing SystemVM templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5 I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8372 You'll only hit this issue if you: 1. try to upload/setup a SSL certificate for use with CPVM 2. enable and use the experimental SAML2 auth plugin (since it creates and stores x509 certificates in keystore table) So, please test either using the above fix if testing the above features. Applying this fix, I tested ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and following works: - basic zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, local storage, snapshots and SG rules with KVM - advanced zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, snapshots, local storage, vpc, firewall/port forwarding rules with KVM In addition, ran a load test of deploying 200 VMs across 10 accounts/domains with small local storage offering (1GB RAM, 1core, 10GB local disk) on 30 xen hosts across two pods and it went fine with no errors. Note: the repo I shared does not have the above mentioned bugfix. On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi all, I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing SystemVM templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5 I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8372 You'll only hit this issue if you: 1. try to upload/setup a SSL certificate for use with CPVM 2. enable and use the experimental SAML2 auth plugin (since it creates and stores x509 certificates in keystore table) So, please test either using the above fix if testing the above features. Applying this fix, I tested ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and following works: - basic zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, local storage, snapshots and SG rules with KVM - advanced zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, snapshots, local storage, vpc, firewall/port forwarding rules with KVM In addition, ran a load test of deploying 200 VMs across 10 accounts/domains with small local storage offering (1GB RAM, 1core, 10GB local disk) on 30 xen hosts across two pods and it went fine with no errors. Note: the repo I shared does not have the above mentioned bugfix. On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
-1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or removed/installed? Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions. In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release, that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process. On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Thanks, Pierre-Luc On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364 *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure - on April 17th *Register now https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442* On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n...@li.nux.ro'); wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com'); To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@cloudstack.apache.org'); Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','da...@gnsa.us'); wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com'); o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364 *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure - on April 17th *Register now https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442* On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
