aws in pom

2015-07-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
H,

aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics.

Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not
be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that
still needs it?

-- 
Daan


Re: aws in pom

2015-07-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
yes :( found it in my latest experiment :)

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:


 On 27-07-15 15:36, Daan Hoogland wrote:
 H,

 aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics.

 Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not
 be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that
 still needs it?


 Yes, the S3 Secondary Storage uses the AWS SDK.

 Wido




-- 
Daan


Re: aws in pom

2015-07-27 Thread Wido den Hollander


On 27-07-15 15:36, Daan Hoogland wrote:
 H,
 
 aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics.
 
 Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not
 be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that
 still needs it?
 

Yes, the S3 Secondary Storage uses the AWS SDK.

Wido