redundant virtual routers for VPCs
At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present routers to support this. However we would very much like input from the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after ascension so tuesday is our intention. on behalf of some very impatient operators;) -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I would be glad to join. --Sheng On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > > So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > ascension so tuesday is our intention. > > on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > -- > Daan >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
ok, I think your on pacific time, are you? On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > I would be glad to join. > > --Sheng > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >> >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >> >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >> -- >> Daan > > -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Yes, I am in Pacific Time. --Sheng On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, I think your on pacific time, are you? > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > > I would be glad to join. > > > > --Sheng > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > >> > >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >> > >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >> > >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > >> -- > >> Daan > > > > > > > > -- > Daan >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I will be happy to join! On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > > So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > ascension so tuesday is our intention. > > on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > -- > Daan > >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
nice, so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine as well. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > I will be happy to join! > > > > On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >> >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >> >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >> -- >> Daan >> > -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Hi all I can make 15:00. Cannon join at 20:00. Cheers Sander Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" het > volgende geschreven: > > nice, > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > as well. > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> wrote: >> I will be happy to join! >> >> >> >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>> >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>> >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>> >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>> -- >>> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. --Sheng On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman wrote: > Hi all > > I can make 15:00. > > Cannon join at 20:00. > > Cheers Sander > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > > > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" > het volgende geschreven: > > > > nice, > > > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > > as well. > > > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris > wrote: > >> I will be happy to join! > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > >>> > >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >>> > >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >>> > >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > >>> -- > >>> Daan > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan >
RE: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Quite right: - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis - Reusable work by Karl - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router (and how to avoid them) - Work division - (next meeting needed?) Any additions? \DaanH From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 To: Sander Botman Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. --Sheng On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi all I can make 15:00. Cannon join at 20:00. Cheers Sander Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" > mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende > geschreven: > > nice, > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > as well. > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >> I will be happy to join! >> >> >> >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>> >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>> >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>> -- >>> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. Cheers, Hugo On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Quite right: > > > - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis > > - Reusable work by Karl > > - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router (and > how to avoid them) > > - Work division > > - (next meeting needed?) > > Any additions? > > \DaanH > > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 > To: Sander Botman > Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; > Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > > BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? > I just want to make sure it's efficient. > > --Sheng > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman > mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > Hi all > > I can make 15:00. > > Cannon join at 20:00. > > Cheers Sander > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >> geschreven: >> >> nice, >> >> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >> as well. >> >>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>> I will be happy to join! >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>> >>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>> >>>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>>> -- >>>> Daan >> >> >> >> -- >> Daan >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> Quite right: >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router >> (and how to avoid them) >> >> - Work division >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> Any additions? >> >> \DaanH >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> To: Sander Botman >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; >> Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? >> I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> --Sheng >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >>> geschreven: >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> as well. >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>>> I will be happy to join! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>>> >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>>> >>>>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>>>> -- >>>>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >> > -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 UTC! Karl On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC > > I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: > > > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hugo > > > > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > >> Quite right: > >> > >> > >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis > >> > >> - Reusable work by Karl > >> > >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant > router (and how to avoid them) > >> > >> - Work division > >> > >> - (next meeting needed?) > >> > >> Any additions? > >> > >> \DaanH > >> > >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 > >> To: Sander Botman > >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; > kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > >> > >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the > meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman < > sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> I can make 15:00. > >> > >> Cannon join at 20:00. > >> > >> Cheers Sander > >> > >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >> > >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" <mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven: > >>> > >>> nice, > >>> > >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > >>> as well. > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris < > karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: > >>>> I will be happy to join! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland <mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away > from > >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >>>>> > >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >>>>> > -- > Daan >
RE: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( \DaanH From: Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com] Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 To: Daan Hoogland Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 UTC! Karl On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>> wrote: > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland > mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > >> Quite right: >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router >> (and how to avoid them) >> >> - Work division >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> Any additions? >> >> \DaanH >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> To: Sander Botman >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; >> kis...@cloud.com<mailto:kis...@cloud.com>; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo >> Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? >> I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> --Sheng >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com%3cmailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>>> >> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com%3cmailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>> >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> as well. >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com%3cmailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> I will be happy to join! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com%3cmailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>>> >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>>> -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time! Karl On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( > > > > *\*DaanH > > > > *From:* Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com > ] > *Sent:* dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 > *To:* Daan Hoogland > *Cc:* Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; > kis...@cloud.com ; > Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > *Subject:* Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > > > > Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 > UTC! > > > > Karl > > > > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC > > I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: > > > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hugo > > > > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > >> Quite right: > >> > >> > >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis > >> > >> - Reusable work by Karl > >> > >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant > router (and how to avoid them) > >> > >> - Work division > >> > >> - (next meeting needed?) > >> > >> Any additions? > >> > >> \DaanH > >> > >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 > >> To: Sander Botman > >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; > kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > >> > >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the > meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman < > sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> I can make 15:00. > >> > >> Cannon join at 20:00. > >> > >> Cheers Sander > >> > >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >> > >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende > geschreven: > >>> > >>> nice, > >>> > >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > >>> as well. > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris < > karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: > >>>> I will be happy to join! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away > from > >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
ok, write you then. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > 20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time! > > > Karl > > > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( >> >> >> >> \DaanH >> >> >> >> From: Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 >> To: Daan Hoogland >> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; >> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> >> >> Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 >> UTC! >> >> >> >> Karl >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC >> >> I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting >> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers >> wrote: >> > >> > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Hugo >> > >> > >> > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Quite right: >> >> >> >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant >> >> router (and how to avoid them) >> >> >> >> - Work division >> >> >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> >> >> Any additions? >> >> >> >> \DaanH >> >> >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> >> To: Sander Botman >> >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; >> >> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the >> >> meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> >> >> --Sheng >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >> >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >> >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >> >>> geschreven: >> >>> >> >>> nice, >> >>> >> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >> >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >> >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >> >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >> >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >> >>> as well. >> >>> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >> >>>> I will be happy to join! >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >> >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >> >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away >> >>>>> from >> >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >> >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >> >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >> >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >> >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
We are on #cloudstack-meeting to start discussing the redundant vpc vr. Please all feel welcome to join in. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, write you then. > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Karl Harris > wrote: >> 20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time! >> >> >> Karl >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland >> wrote: >>> >>> Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( >>> >>> >>> >>> \DaanH >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com] >>> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 >>> To: Daan Hoogland >>> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; >>> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >>> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >>> >>> >>> >>> Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 >>> UTC! >>> >>> >>> >>> Karl >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>> >>> I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC >>> >>> I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Hugo >>> > >>> > >>> > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Quite right: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >>> >> >>> >> - Reusable work by Karl >>> >> >>> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant >>> >> router (and how to avoid them) >>> >> >>> >> - Work division >>> >> >>> >> - (next meeting needed?) >>> >> >>> >> Any additions? >>> >> >>> >> \DaanH >>> >> >>> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >>> >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >>> >> To: Sander Botman >>> >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; >>> >> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >>> >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >>> >> >>> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the >>> >> meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. >>> >> >>> >> --Sheng >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >>> >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >>> >> Hi all >>> >> >>> >> I can make 15:00. >>> >> >>> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >>> >> >>> >> Cheers Sander >>> >> >>> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >>> >> >>> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >>> >>> geschreven: >>> >>> >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> >>> as well. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>> >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> I will be happy to join! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>> >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away >>> >>>>> from >>> >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also > > > > -- > Daan -- Daan
