RE: Java objects in JX templates
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com/bizzdesign/risks/assessment/UploadedEvidence org.apache.cocoon.ProcessingException: Failed to execute pipeline.: file:/app/was/installedApps/riskmanager/riskmanager.ear/riskmanager-1.1. 0.132.war/content/secure/reports/templates/ineffective-controls.xml:104: 93:org.mozilla.javascript.JavaScriptException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com/bizzdesign/risks/assessment/UploadedEvidence at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.AbstractProcessingPipeline.process XMLPipeline(AbstractProcessingPipeline.java:582) at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.AbstractCachingProcessingPipe line.processXMLPipeline(AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.java:183) ... Similair exceptions were thrown everywhere, saying that lots of classes couldn't be found anymore (UploadedEvidence class was only one of them). The application needed a reboot to get rid of this exception. Seems like the expression, after being evaluated for several times, messes up the class loader somehow... Bart. > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: dinsdag 31 januari 2006 14:48 > Aan: dev@cocoon.apache.org > Onderwerp: Re: Java objects in JX templates > > Not without a stack trace. > > Bart Molenkamp wrote: > > >>I've had problems with the following expression: > >> > >> > >> > >>(the expression is one line). > >> > >>This expression works, but somehow after calling the page a few times, > >>the application hangs. Took me a long time to figure it out. (I've > >>already solved it, simply by having a method > >>evidence.isUploadableEvidence() with the expression written in Java). > >> > >>Does anybody know what might be going wrong? (I'm just curious) > >> > >>Bart. > >> > >> > >>
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Not without a stack trace. Bart Molenkamp wrote: I've had problems with the following expression: (the expression is one line). This expression works, but somehow after calling the page a few times, the application hangs. Took me a long time to figure it out. (I've already solved it, simply by having a method evidence.isUploadableEvidence() with the expression written in Java). Does anybody know what might be going wrong? (I'm just curious) Bart.
RE: Java objects in JX templates
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Leszek Gawron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This is not true. You can call static methods and even constructors.
> Both from JXPath and JEXL.
>
>
>
> ${buffer.toString()}
>
> Works like a charm in trunk.
>
I've had problems with the following expression:
(the expression is one line).
This expression works, but somehow after calling the page a few times,
the application hangs. Took me a long time to figure it out. (I've
already solved it, simply by having a method
evidence.isUploadableEvidence() with the expression written in Java).
Does anybody know what might be going wrong? (I'm just curious)
Bart.
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Our docs [1] state that something like:
should work. However, that doesn't seem to be the case, at least in
2.1.8 while it apparently worked before. I did a few more tests and
discovered that even simple cases like ${java.util.Date()} produce no
output and no error message. This even if I put "Packages." in front
of the package name. Is this a bug or what?
You can only call methods on existing objects. I had to use a static
method (only callable using JXPath!) as a workaround in the CForms macros:
This is not true. You can call static methods and even constructors.
Both from JXPath and JEXL.
${buffer.toString()}
Works like a charm in trunk.
value="#{org.apache.cocoon.forms.generation.JXMacrosHelper.createHelper($cocoon/consumer,$cocoon/request,$cocoon/parameters/locale)}"/>
Sylvain
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Ugo Cei wrote:
Our docs [1] state that something like:
should work. However, that doesn't seem to be the case, at least in
2.1.8 while it apparently worked before. I did a few more tests and
discovered that even simple cases like ${java.util.Date()} produce no
output and no error message. This even if I put "Packages." in front
of the package name. Is this a bug or what?
You can only call methods on existing objects. I had to use a static
method (only callable using JXPath!) as a workaround in the CForms macros:
value="#{org.apache.cocoon.forms.generation.JXMacrosHelper.createHelper($cocoon/consumer,$cocoon/request,$cocoon/parameters/locale)}"/>
Sylvain
--
Sylvain WallezAnyware Technologies
http://bluxte.net http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Hello,
I upgraded two webapps from Coccon 2.1.7 to 2.1.8 lately...
And I found this thread intriguing, so I have added the following to one
of my existing JX templates (which is run through a JX generator pipeline,
invoked by flowscript):
${mytokenizer.nextToken()}
The html result:
alpha
beta
gamma
So, it appears to work fine for flowscript! (Mi spiace, Ugo ;-)
(Don't know about Javaflow, though!)
Fabrizio
BTW. the reason I was intrigued is that I'm using similar constructs in
production webapps - which made me wonder why users haven't been
complaining if indeed this feature had stopped working after migrating to
Cocoon 2.1.8 :->
>> ${java.util.StringTokenizer(items, delims)}
>>
> According to my tests, it doesn't work in 2.1.8, regardless of
> whether I use flow or not and whether I prepend "Packages." or not.
> Can anyone else confirm this?
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Il giorno 27/gen/06, alle ore 21:10, Leszek Gawron ha scritto:
One more thing: this construct
${java.util.StringTokenizer(items, delims)}
will work only when .jx is invoked from flow. This is due to the
fact that neither JEXL nor JXPath is able to reference packages/
create java objects. The functionality in fact is provided by Rhino
library.
According to my tests, it doesn't work in 2.1.8, regardless of
whether I use flow or not and whether I prepend "Packages." or not.
Can anyone else confirm this?
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei
Tech Blog: http://agylen.com/
Open Source Zone: http://oszone.org/
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 27/gen/06, alle ore 15:54, Leszek Gawron ha scritto:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Our docs [1] state that something like:
should work. However, that doesn't seem to be the case, at least in
2.1.8 while it apparently worked before. I did a few more tests and
discovered that even simple cases like ${java.util.Date ()} produce
no output and no error message. This even if I put "Packages." in
front of the package name. Is this a bug or what?
Ugo
[1] http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/jxtemplate.html
Didn't you want to do:
The code I copied above is straight from our docs, but it doesn't make
an inch of a difference whether I change to what you suggest or not.
The problem is that invoking Java class constructors or calling static
methods does not work.
As I replied in another message: referencing any java constructs like:
- packages
- classes
- constructors
- static methods
- constants
is available in jxtg via rhino (org.mozilla.javascript.NativeJavaClass,
NativeJavaPackage, NativeJavaTopPackage). ${Packages} is simply a
NativeJavaTopPackage and ${java} is a NativeJavaPackage. They are
treated as ordinary view data. I have never tried but this should work also:
value=${Packages.com.mycompany.some.very.long.package.name.MyConstantsClass}"/>
Unfortunatelly in 2.1.x those variables are only properly initialized
when flowscript is the controller. 2.2 artificialy creates those
variables no matter if you already have rhino context available or not.
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Jens Maukisch wrote:
Hi,
[1] http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/jxtemplate.html
Didn't you want to do:
Have you tried the sample mentioned in the Docs? It does not work
for me either and your corrected code above too (C2.1.8).
So I think it's a bug?
One more thing: this construct
${java.util.StringTokenizer(items, delims)}
will work only when .jx is invoked from flow. This is due to the fact
that neither JEXL nor JXPath is able to reference packages/create java
objects. The functionality in fact is provided by Rhino library.
This is already fixed for 2.2-dev (still the dependency on Rhino remains).
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Il giorno 27/gen/06, alle ore 15:54, Leszek Gawron ha scritto:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Our docs [1] state that something like:
should work. However, that doesn't seem to be the case, at least
in 2.1.8 while it apparently worked before. I did a few more
tests and discovered that even simple cases like ${java.util.Date
()} produce no output and no error message. This even if I put
"Packages." in front of the package name. Is this a bug or what?
Ugo
[1] http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/jxtemplate.html
Didn't you want to do:
The code I copied above is straight from our docs, but it doesn't
make an inch of a difference whether I change to what you suggest or
not. The problem is that invoking Java class constructors or calling
static methods does not work.
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei
Tech Blog: http://agylen.com/
Open Source Zone: http://oszone.org/
Re: Java objects in JX templates
Ugo Cei wrote:
Our docs [1] state that something like:
should work. However, that doesn't seem to be the case, at least in
2.1.8 while it apparently worked before. I did a few more tests and
discovered that even simple cases like ${java.util.Date()} produce no
output and no error message. This even if I put "Packages." in front of
the package name. Is this a bug or what?
Ugo
[1] http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/jxtemplate.html
Didn't you want to do:
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
