Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[cmaj135]

+1




cmaj135
2010-07-30



发件人： Luc Maisonobe
发送时间： 2010-07-30 03:23:19
收件人： Commons Developers List
抄送： 
主题： Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

+1
Luc
Le 26/07/2010 21:55, Oliver Heger a écrit :
> +1
> 
> Oliver
> 
> Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>> Context:
>>
>>   Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
>> There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
>> raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
>> repository.
>>
>> Update from Beta-1:
>> --
>> findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
>> NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
>> Website updated to cover Beta release.
>> EventSupport code rewritten
>> artifactId changed to commons-lang3
>> svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
>> code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
>> --
>>
>> Update from Beta-2:
>> --
>> documentation improvement for EventSupport code
>> Updated release notes
>> --
>>
>>
>> SVN tag:
>>
>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/
>>
>> Signed downloads:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/
>>
>> Site:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/
>>
>> The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
>> hand with OpenSSL.
>>
>> [ ] +1, let's see what people think
>> [ ] -1, it's not ready yet
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Lang -

[contin...@vmbuild.apache.org]

Online report : 
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=377489&projectId=2634

Build statistics:
  State: Ok
  Previous State: Building
  Started at: Thu 29 Jul 2010 08:33:08 -0700
  Finished at: Thu 29 Jul 2010 08:34:06 -0700
  Total time: 57s
  Build Trigger: Schedule
  Build Number: 2231
  Exit code: 0
  Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org
  Operating system : Linux(unknown)
  Java Home version : 
  java version "1.4.2_15"
  Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_15-b02)
  Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_15-b02, mixed mode)

  Builder version :
  Maven version: 2.0.9
  Java version: 1.4.2_15
  OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.24-28-server" arch: "i386" Family: 
"unix"


SCM Changes:

Changed: niallp @ Wed 21 Apr 2010 02:20:18 -0700
Comment: Upgrade to commons-parent version 15
Files changed:
  /commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/pom.xml ( 936221 )

Changed: no author @ Wed 21 Apr 2010 02:20:18 -0700
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  src/site/xdoc/article2_5.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_5.xml ( no revision )

Changed: niallp @ Wed 7 Apr 2010 08:59:19 -0700
Comment: Apply r931440 to the correct branch
See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=931440
http://markmail.org/message/ghuxod3t3q5qyqye
Files changed:
  
/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils.java
 ( 931599 )

Changed: niallp @ Mon 15 Mar 2010 16:11:42 -0700
Comment: Upgrade to commons-parent-14
Files changed:
  /commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/pom.xml ( 923498 )

Changed: niallp @ Mon 15 Mar 2010 10:31:00 -0700
Comment: Update to point to the new download pages
Files changed:
  /commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/src/site/xdoc/article2_4.xml ( 923351 )

Changed: sebb @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: Revert to Parent 12, as 13 does not work with Java 1.4
Files changed:
  /commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/pom.xml ( 920186 )

Changed: no author @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  pom.xml ( no revision )

Changed: no author @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  src/site/xdoc/building.xml ( no revision )
  build.xml ( no revision )

Changed: no author @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  src/site/changes/changes.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_5.xml ( no revision )

Changed: no author @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  default.properties ( no revision )
  pom.xml ( no revision )

Changed: no author @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  RELEASE-NOTES.txt ( no revision )
  src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang/enums/EnumUtilsLang76Test.java ( no 
revision )
  src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang/enums/EnumUtilsTest.java ( no revision )
  src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang/math/RandomUtilsFreqTest.java ( no 
revision )
  src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang/math/RandomUtilsTest.java ( no revision 
)
  src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang/time/DateUtilsTest.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/enums/Enum.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/enum/Enum.java ( no revision )
  src/site/changes/changes.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_5.xml ( no revision )
  pom.xml ( no revision )
  build.xml ( no revision )

Changed: no author @ Sun 7 Mar 2010 19:39:58 -0800
Comment: no comment
Files changed:
  default.properties ( no revision )
  src/assembly/src.xml ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/StrBuilder.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/math/JVMRandom.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/time/DateUtils.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/reflect/MethodUtils.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/IDKey.java ( no revision )
  src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang/Entities.java ( no revision )
  src/site/site.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/changes/changes.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/cvs-usage.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/navigation.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_5.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/index.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/download_lang.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/building.xml ( no revision )
  src/site/xdoc/release-history.xml ( no revision )
  pom.xml ( no revision )

Changed: niallp @ Fri 19 Feb 2010 11:54:13 -0800
Comment: LANG-76 Add a test case to try and reproduce
Files changed:
  
/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang/enums/EnumUtilsTest.java
 (

RE: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback

[Christopher Dragert]

I've gone through some of the basic functionality of the plug-in and generally 
found it to be good.  I have several points of feedback:

1) A small feature request:  Can you display the event name on the diagam like 
you do for a condition?  

2) Transition properties list a "Target" field, which is blank, and a "Target 
Status" field that is populated with State [statename].  Target and Target 
Status do not make sense, and usage of the Target field causes an error.

3) There seems to be no way to have executable content on a transition.  Is 
this under development? 

4)  Seems to crash frequently and give out of memory errors, even while using 
-Xmx1024m.  I have to save and restart every minute or two.  

Overall, it seems quite useful and I am grateful for all the hard work put into 
this.

Regards,
Chris Dragert



From: Xun Long Gui [ustbco...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:14 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [scxml-eclipse] Current State

Hi Chris,

You can find basic guide document here [1]. I think you should export SCXML
document from modeling document which contains tag 'targetConnection'.


[1]
http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/guide/using-visual-scxml.html

2010/7/23 Christopher Dragert 

> Hello,
>
> I've begun experimenting and had some difficulties with basic
> functionality.  For instance, it does not seem to have basic functionality
> of creating an scxml file from an scxml drawing.  It only outputs scxml to
> the console, without the linebreaks necessary for readabilty.
>
> Transitions seem to be bugged, as it does not properly create transitions
> in the output, giving the following malformed tag:
> 
>
> This gives an error:
> "SystemId Unknown; Line #1; Column #347; Attribute "target" was already
> specified for element "targetConnection"."
>
> Shouldn't this be more like:
>  
>
> What is the solution?  Why does the tag 'targetConnection' even exist?
>
> Regards,
> Chris Dragert
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


--
Best Regards

Gui Xun Long (桂训龙)

[RESULT] Release Commons Fileupload 1.2.2

[Jochen Wiedmann]

The vote has passed with six positive votes (Oliver Heger, Phil
Steitz, Henri Yandell, Jörg Schaible, sebb, Jochen Wiedmann) and no
others.

I'll proceed with publishing the relases.

Thanks,

Jochen


-- 
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[Luc Maisonobe]

+1

Luc
Le 26/07/2010 21:55, Oliver Heger a écrit :
> +1
> 
> Oliver
> 
> Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>> Context:
>>
>>   Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
>> There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
>> raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
>> repository.
>>
>> Update from Beta-1:
>> --
>> findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
>> NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
>> Website updated to cover Beta release.
>> EventSupport code rewritten
>> artifactId changed to commons-lang3
>> svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
>> code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
>> --
>>
>> Update from Beta-2:
>> --
>> documentation improvement for EventSupport code
>> Updated release notes
>> --
>>
>>
>> SVN tag:
>>
>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/
>>
>> Signed downloads:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/
>>
>> Site:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/
>>
>> The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
>> hand with OpenSSL.
>>
>> [ ] +1, let's see what people think
>> [ ] -1, it's not ready yet
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [scxml-js] Question on Basic HTTP Event I/O Processor Specification

[Rahul Akolkar]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jacob Beard  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've discovered a few other potential issues with the external
> communications module of the SCXML specification, but I'm wondering if the
> Apache Commons mailing list is actually the best forum to discuss them. A
> more appropriate forum might be one that deals specifically with the
> specification, as opposed to the Apache Commons SCXML implementation, and is
> open to anyone. As a model, I have in mind the W3C SVG Interest Group
> .
>
> Please let me know if something like this exists. If not, I'll post my
> questions here. Thanks,
>


Yup, better forum is the W3C public www-voice list here:

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/

Note that this is shared for all specs from the VBWG (SCXML being one of them).

-Rahul

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [scxml-js] Question on Basic HTTP Event I/O Processor Specification

[Jacob Beard]

Hi,

I've discovered a few other potential issues with the external 
communications module of the SCXML specification, but I'm wondering if 
the Apache Commons mailing list is actually the best forum to discuss 
them. A more appropriate forum might be one that deals specifically with 
the specification, as opposed to the Apache Commons SCXML 
implementation, and is open to anyone. As a model, I have in mind the 
W3C SVG Interest Group .


Please let me know if something like this exists. If not, I'll post my 
questions here. Thanks,


Jake

On 10-07-23 05:51 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jacob Beard  wrote:
   

Hi,

I'm currently working on developing support for the External Communications
module of the SCXML specification for scxml-js, and I'm a bit confused about
Appendix H Basic HTTP Event I/O Processor
. It seems like there
may be a contradiction between H.2 Receiving Events, and H.3 Sending Events.

My interpretation of H.2 is as follows:

  1. The entire SCXML message would go in _content parameter of the
 HTTP POST data.
  2. Other parameters in the HTTP POST are platform specific.


Whereas H.3 seems to say that:

  1. Each individual variable name in the namelist attribute on the
 send element, or each individual param child, would be assigned
 its own HTTP POST parameter.
  2. The HTTP POST parameter "_content" would only be used if the
   element is present in the send.


So, to use G.1, Example 1 as an example, my understanding of H.2 would seem
to imply that the following would be body of the POST from the sender
(although it would need to be url-encoded):

_content=http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml";
version="1.0"
   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
   xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml scxml-message.xsd"
   source="http://scxml-processors.example.com/session1";
sourcetype="scxml"
   target="http://scxml-processors.example.com/session2"; type="scxml"
   sendid="send-123" name="email.send">

mailto:recipi...@example.com
http://www.example.com/mycontent.txt

Email headers
http://www.example.com/headers";>
arch...@example.com
Example email





Whereas H.3 would seem to imply that the following would be in the body of
the POST:

email=mailto:recipi...@example.com&;
content=http://www.example.com/mycontent.txt&;
xmlcontent=http://www.example.com/headers";>
arch...@example.com
Example email


It's not clear to me where the rest of the SCXML message would go in H.3

I'd appreciate it if you could please let me know which of these is the
correct interpretation. Thanks,
 



That Appendix needs to be improved, I will bring this up with the Working Group.

IMO, the H.2 variant above is complete and aligns with the SCXML I/O
message schema so if you have the associated bits already implemented
to generate and parse those messages you could reuse for the Basic
HTTP I/O processor (as in H.2) until we get a clarification response.

-Rahul


   

Jake

 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

   

Re: [Digester] Sandbox "annotations" package ready to be revisioned and merged to /trunk

[Simone Tripodi]

Hi all guys,
any news on this?
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
 wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> thanks a lot, very appreciated :)
> Have a nice WE, greetings,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Rahul Akolkar  
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>  wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> as discussed and agreed with Rahul[1] last week, I added the missing -
>>> hopefully, detailed - package documentation on the "annotations"
>>> package on the sandbox digester[2] and merged latest trunk
>>> modifications, re-executed tests that still pass.
>>> Now I'd ask your help/feedbacks/suggestions on promoting that code on
>>> /trunk since I'm not (yet, hopefully) a commons committer.
>> 
>>
>> Thanks, I hope to be able to take a look in a week or two.
>>
>> There is no need to CC me on these posts, I read the dev list email
>> (most of it anyway :-)
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>> Have a nice day, greetings
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/qwfe4emjf23noilb
>>> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[Paul Benedict]

We should look into this issue before the GA:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6969236

Do we look for "Sun Microsystems" anywhere in the project to help out system
utilities? It's changing to "Oracle" in JDK 7.

Paul

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Michael Wooten wrote:

> +1
>
> As a user I'm looking forward to this!
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:36 AM, James Carman
>  wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Henri Yandell 
> wrote:
> >> I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger
> >>  wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Oliver
> >>>
> >>> Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell:
> 
>  Context:
> 
>   Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
>  There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
>  raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
>  repository.
> 
>  Update from Beta-1:
>  --
>  findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
>  NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
>  Website updated to cover Beta release.
>  EventSupport code rewritten
>  artifactId changed to commons-lang3
>  svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
>  code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
>  --
> 
>  Update from Beta-2:
>  --
>  documentation improvement for EventSupport code
>  Updated release notes
>  --
> 
> 
>  SVN tag:
> 
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/
> 
>  Signed downloads:
> 
>    
>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/
> 
>  Site:
> 
>    
>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/
> 
>  The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
>  hand with OpenSSL.
> 
>  [ ] +1, let's see what people think
>  [ ] -1, it's not ready yet
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[Michael Wooten]

+1

As a user I'm looking forward to this!

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:36 AM, James Carman
 wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
>> I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger
>>  wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>> Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell:

 Context:

  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
 There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
 raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
 repository.

 Update from Beta-1:
 --
 findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
 NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
 Website updated to cover Beta release.
 EventSupport code rewritten
 artifactId changed to commons-lang3
 svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
 code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
 --

 Update from Beta-2:
 --
 documentation improvement for EventSupport code
 Updated release notes
 --


 SVN tag:

   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/

 Signed downloads:

   http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/

 Site:

   http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/

 The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
 hand with OpenSSL.

 [ ] +1, let's see what people think
 [ ] -1, it's not ready yet

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

[Jörg Schaible]

Hi Mark,

Mark Struberg wrote:

> folks, please keep on voting.
> There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
> named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)

Well, this is exactly the point what we want to avoid. The beta release is 
there for giving users an impression about the current state and to look for 
feedback. I still expect the API to change. However, I'd rather discourage 
everyone in using this for production already or publishing final releases 
that use this version already. And remember, the artifact will not be 
available at central and we might remove it after a certain time again once 
3.0 is finally released.

- Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

[James Carman]

>From the [vote] thread, the release we're voting on is not intended to
be released into the "wild" (the central maven repo).  So, I don't
know if this will help you guys or not.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
> folks, please keep on voting.
> There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as
> long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> - Original Message 
>> From: Mark Struberg 
>> To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: Commons Developers List 
>> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
>>
>> maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1  release?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message  
>> > From: David Jencks 
>> > To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
>> >  Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Upgrading  commons-lang
>> >
>> > I have no problems with using snapshots during  development but IMO we 
>> > can't
>>
>> >release with snapshot  dependencies.  Do you have any concrete info on when
>>the
>>
>> >commons-lang release might be?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > david  jencks
>> >
>> > On Jul  28, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Matt Benson  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Commons-Lang 3.0-SNAPSHOT  was published  yesterday.  Its APIs have been
>> >updated for generics and   varargs, and because its Maven artifactId and 
>> >java
>
>> >package names have  been  changed, the upgrade path is a painless one.
>> >Additionally, and most  importantly to me at present, lang3 has a  TypeUtils
>> >class that can replace and  augment bval-jsr303's  existing TypeUtils class.
>>I
>>
>> >would say that in all  likelihood  lang 3.0 will be released before bval 
>> >1.0.
>>I
>>
>> >would think the   upgrade would be more a question of 'when' rather than
>>'if'...
>>
>> >how would  you all  feel about allowing snapshot dependencies for
>>0.x-incubating
>>
>> >releases after  0.2-incubating?
>> > >
>> > >  Matt
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

[Mark Struberg]

folks, please keep on voting. 
There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as 
long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)

txs and LieGrue,
strub



- Original Message 
> From: Mark Struberg 
> To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Commons Developers List 
> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
> 
> maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1  release?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message  
> > From: David Jencks 
> > To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> >  Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: Upgrading  commons-lang
> > 
> > I have no problems with using snapshots during  development but IMO we 
> > can't  
>
> >release with snapshot  dependencies.  Do you have any concrete info on when  
>the 
>
> >commons-lang release might be?
> > 
> > thanks
> > david  jencks
> > 
> > On Jul  28, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Matt Benson  wrote:
> > 
> > > Commons-Lang 3.0-SNAPSHOT  was published  yesterday.  Its APIs have been 
> >updated for generics and   varargs, and because its Maven artifactId and 
> >java 

> >package names have  been  changed, the upgrade path is a painless one.  
> >Additionally, and most  importantly to me at present, lang3 has a  TypeUtils 
> >class that can replace and  augment bval-jsr303's  existing TypeUtils class. 
> > 
>I 
>
> >would say that in all  likelihood  lang 3.0 will be released before bval 
> >1.0.  
>I 
>
> >would think the   upgrade would be more a question of 'when' rather than 
>'if'... 
>
> >how would  you all  feel about allowing snapshot dependencies for 
>0.x-incubating 
>
> >releases after  0.2-incubating?
> > > 
> > >  Matt
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>   
> 


  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: Upgrading commons-lang

[Mark Struberg]

maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?

LieGrue,
strub



- Original Message 
> From: David Jencks 
> To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
> 
> I have no problems with using snapshots during development but IMO we can't  
>release with snapshot dependencies.  Do you have any concrete info on when  
>the 
>commons-lang release might be?
> 
> thanks
> david jencks
> 
> On Jul  28, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> 
> > Commons-Lang 3.0-SNAPSHOT  was published yesterday.  Its APIs have been 
>updated for generics and  varargs, and because its Maven artifactId and java 
>package names have been  changed, the upgrade path is a painless one.  
>Additionally, and most  importantly to me at present, lang3 has a TypeUtils 
>class that can replace and  augment bval-jsr303's existing TypeUtils class.  I 
>would say that in all  likelihood lang 3.0 will be released before bval 1.0.  
>I 
>would think the  upgrade would be more a question of 'when' rather than 
>'if'... 
>how would you all  feel about allowing snapshot dependencies for 
>0.x-incubating 
>releases after  0.2-incubating?
> > 
> > Matt
> 
> 


  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[James Carman]

+1

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes.
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger
>  wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>>>
>>> Context:
>>>
>>>  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
>>> There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
>>> raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
>>> repository.
>>>
>>> Update from Beta-1:
>>> --
>>> findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
>>> NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
>>> Website updated to cover Beta release.
>>> EventSupport code rewritten
>>> artifactId changed to commons-lang3
>>> svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
>>> code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
>>> --
>>>
>>> Update from Beta-2:
>>> --
>>> documentation improvement for EventSupport code
>>> Updated release notes
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> SVN tag:
>>>
>>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/
>>>
>>> Signed downloads:
>>>
>>>   http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/
>>>
>>> Site:
>>>
>>>   http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/
>>>
>>> The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
>>> hand with OpenSSL.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1, let's see what people think
>>> [ ] -1, it's not ready yet
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[Henri Yandell]

The site can get changed separately from the release, so not a blocker
but definitely something to address.

Hen

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Michael Wooten  wrote:
> A couple of things I noticed.
>
> 1) In the JavaDocs section of the developer guide
> (http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/developerguide.html)
> it states that IllegalArgumentException should always be thrown
> instead of NullPointerException. However, changes for version 3.0 to
> the Validate class cause the "notNull" methods to throw NPEs instead
> of IAEs. The only class using Validate.notNull() at the moment appears
> to be the new EventListenerSupport class, but in the future if more
> classes make use of Validate for null checks, the NPEs will be throw
> instead. Should the developer guide be updated so that lang can eat
> its own dog food so to speak and use the Validate class?
>
> 2) The "What's new..." page
> (http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/article3_0.html)
> does not include the new events package or the new event utility
> classes.
>
> Not sure there are big holdups to anything. Maybe just something to
> address at some point.
>
> -Michael
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
>> Build 3 of the beta. The 3 only shows in our emails and in the urls to
>> my people space.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Paul Benedict  wrote:
>>> Just a question. Is it really beta3? Or build 3 of beta1? After all, nothing
>>> has been released yet. I don't want the community to think this is our third
>>> beta release. It's not. Just our third build.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
>>>
 Context:

  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
 There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
 raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
 repository.

 Update from Beta-1:
 --
 findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
 NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
 Website updated to cover Beta release.
 EventSupport code rewritten
 artifactId changed to commons-lang3
 svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
 code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
 --

 Update from Beta-2:
 --
 documentation improvement for EventSupport code
 Updated release notes
 --


 SVN tag:

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/

 Signed downloads:

  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/

 Site:

  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/

 The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
 hand with OpenSSL.

 [ ] +1, let's see what people think
 [ ] -1, it's not ready yet

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

[Henri Yandell]

I'm obviously +1. Looking for more votes.

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Oliver Heger
 wrote:
> +1
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>>
>> Context:
>>
>>  Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback.
>> There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community
>> raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven
>> repository.
>>
>> Update from Beta-1:
>> --
>> findbugs-filter file now in src zip.
>> NOTICE updated to identify Spring license.
>> Website updated to cover Beta release.
>> EventSupport code rewritten
>> artifactId changed to commons-lang3
>> svn:eol-style fixed on CharSequenceUtils code
>> code cleanup (autoboxing, unnecessary cast, javadoc tweaking)
>> --
>>
>> Update from Beta-2:
>> --
>> documentation improvement for EventSupport code
>> Updated release notes
>> --
>>
>>
>> SVN tag:
>>
>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_B3/
>>
>> Signed downloads:
>>
>>   http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/
>>
>> Site:
>>
>>   http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta-3/site/
>>
>> The build still isn't making checksums for me, so I had to create by
>> hand with OpenSSL.
>>
>> [ ] +1, let's see what people think
>> [ ] -1, it's not ready yet
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org