Re: [RESULT][math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-05 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Just FTR, I voted for Apache Math Components.

BR,
Benedikt

Send from my mobile device

> Am 04.02.2016 um 20:39 schrieb Phil Steitz :
> 
> It looks like just plain "math" is the quantitative winner.  Here is
> the full tally:
> 
> Among PMC volunteers:
> 
> math 4 (Phil, Gary, Thomas, Otmar)
> Epsilon 1 (Luc)
> aJama 1 (Gilles)
> 
> Other votes:
> math 9 (James, Emanual, Norm, Bruno, Christopher, Damjan, Patrick,
> Martin, Henri)
> Epsilon 3 (Evan, Ole, Bruce)
> 
> Please let me know if I missed anyone.  Based on this, I would like
> to move forward with the resolution including "Apache math" as the
> name.  Can we agree on this?
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
>> On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>> choice for the name.
>> 
>> AjaMa
>> Epsilon
>> Erdos
>> Euclid
>> Euler
>> Gauss
>> JAML
>> Math
>> MathBlocks
>> MathComponents (or Math Components)
>> Mathelactica
>> MathModules
>> Megginson
>> modMath
>> Nash
>> Newton
>> Pythagoras
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread Gilles

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:39:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:

It looks like just plain "math" is the quantitative winner.  Here is
the full tally:

Among PMC volunteers:

math 4 (Phil, Gary, Thomas, Otmar)
Epsilon 1 (Luc)
aJama 1 (Gilles)

Other votes:
math 9 (James, Emanual, Norm, Bruno, Christopher, Damjan, Patrick,
Martin, Henri)
Epsilon 3 (Evan, Ole, Bruce)

Please let me know if I missed anyone.  Based on this, I would like
to move forward with the resolution including "Apache math" as the
name.  Can we agree on this?


No problem (with a big "M").

Gilles



Phil


On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:

Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML
Math
MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:39 PM, sebb  wrote:

> Being pedantic:
>
> It was "Apache Math" that got the most votes, not "Apache math".


> I hope the former is what gets put forward.
>

+1

Gary


>
> On 4 February 2016 at 19:39, Phil Steitz  wrote:
> > It looks like just plain "math" is the quantitative winner.  Here is
> > the full tally:
> >
> > Among PMC volunteers:
> >
> > math 4 (Phil, Gary, Thomas, Otmar)
> > Epsilon 1 (Luc)
> > aJama 1 (Gilles)
> >
> > Other votes:
> > math 9 (James, Emanual, Norm, Bruno, Christopher, Damjan, Patrick,
> > Martin, Henri)
> > Epsilon 3 (Evan, Ole, Bruce)
> >
> > Please let me know if I missed anyone.  Based on this, I would like
> > to move forward with the resolution including "Apache math" as the
> > name.  Can we agree on this?
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> >> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> >> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> >> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> >> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> >> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> >> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> >> choice for the name.
> >>
> >> AjaMa
> >> Epsilon
> >> Erdos
> >> Euclid
> >> Euler
> >> Gauss
> >> JAML
> >> Math
> >> MathBlocks
> >> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> >> Mathelactica
> >> MathModules
> >> Megginson
> >> modMath
> >> Nash
> >> Newton
> >> Pythagoras
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

JUnit in Action, Second Edition 
Spring Batch in Action 
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory


Re: [RESULT][math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread sebb
Being pedantic:

It was "Apache Math" that got the most votes, not "Apache math".

I hope the former is what gets put forward.

On 4 February 2016 at 19:39, Phil Steitz  wrote:
> It looks like just plain "math" is the quantitative winner.  Here is
> the full tally:
>
> Among PMC volunteers:
>
> math 4 (Phil, Gary, Thomas, Otmar)
> Epsilon 1 (Luc)
> aJama 1 (Gilles)
>
> Other votes:
> math 9 (James, Emanual, Norm, Bruno, Christopher, Damjan, Patrick,
> Martin, Henri)
> Epsilon 3 (Evan, Ole, Bruce)
>
> Please let me know if I missed anyone.  Based on this, I would like
> to move forward with the resolution including "Apache math" as the
> name.  Can we agree on this?
>
> Phil
>
>
> On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>> choice for the name.
>>
>> AjaMa
>> Epsilon
>> Erdos
>> Euclid
>> Euler
>> Gauss
>> JAML
>> Math
>> MathBlocks
>> MathComponents (or Math Components)
>> Mathelactica
>> MathModules
>> Megginson
>> modMath
>> Nash
>> Newton
>> Pythagoras
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread Hasan Diwan
I'm indifferent.  -- H

On 4 February 2016 at 11:39, Phil Steitz  wrote:

> It looks like just plain "math" is the quantitative winner.  Here is
> the full tally:
>
> Among PMC volunteers:
>
> math 4 (Phil, Gary, Thomas, Otmar)
> Epsilon 1 (Luc)
> aJama 1 (Gilles)
>
> Other votes:
> math 9 (James, Emanual, Norm, Bruno, Christopher, Damjan, Patrick,
> Martin, Henri)
> Epsilon 3 (Evan, Ole, Bruce)
>
> Please let me know if I missed anyone.  Based on this, I would like
> to move forward with the resolution including "Apache math" as the
> name.  Can we agree on this?
>
> Phil
>
>
> On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> > for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> > respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> > tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> > the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> > will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> > runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> > choice for the name.
> >
> > AjaMa
> > Epsilon
> > Erdos
> > Euclid
> > Euler
> > Gauss
> > JAML
> > Math
> > MathBlocks
> > MathComponents (or Math Components)
> > Mathelactica
> > MathModules
> > Megginson
> > modMath
> > Nash
> > Newton
> > Pythagoras
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
OpenPGP: http://hasan.d8u.us/gpg.asc
Sent from my mobile device
Envoyé de mon portable


[RESULT][math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread Phil Steitz
It looks like just plain "math" is the quantitative winner.  Here is
the full tally:

Among PMC volunteers:

math 4 (Phil, Gary, Thomas, Otmar)
Epsilon 1 (Luc)
aJama 1 (Gilles)

Other votes:
math 9 (James, Emanual, Norm, Bruno, Christopher, Damjan, Patrick,
Martin, Henri)
Epsilon 3 (Evan, Ole, Bruce)

Please let me know if I missed anyone.  Based on this, I would like
to move forward with the resolution including "Apache math" as the
name.  Can we agree on this?

Phil


On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Phil Steitz  wrote:

> On 2/2/16 11:44 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 02/01/2016 06:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> >> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> >> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> >> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> >> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> >> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> >> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> >> choice for the name.
> >>
> >> AjaMa
> >> Epsilon
> >> Erdos
> >> Euclid
> >> Euler
> >> Gauss
> >> JAML
> >> Math
> >> MathBlocks
> >> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> >> Mathelactica
> >> MathModules
> >> Megginson
> >> modMath
> >> Nash
> >> Newton
> >> Pythagoras
> > I am split between Epsilon and Math, both seem quite appealing to me.
> > Both choices are fine for me.
>
> I need a first choice for the tally.  Can I assume that is "Epsilon?"
>

I would vote for Math as first choice.

Thomas


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-04 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/2/16 11:44 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 02/01/2016 06:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>> choice for the name.
>>
>> AjaMa
>> Epsilon
>> Erdos
>> Euclid
>> Euler
>> Gauss
>> JAML
>> Math
>> MathBlocks
>> MathComponents (or Math Components)
>> Mathelactica
>> MathModules
>> Megginson
>> modMath
>> Nash
>> Newton
>> Pythagoras
> I am split between Epsilon and Math, both seem quite appealing to me.
> Both choices are fine for me.

I need a first choice for the tally.  Can I assume that is "Epsilon?"

Phil
>
> Thomas
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-03 Thread Henri Yandell
Apache Math.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Martin Grotle Soukup <
martin.grotle.sou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think Apache Math sounds most promising.
>
> Best regards
> Martin Grotle Soukup
>
> 2016-02-01 18:06 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz :
>
> > Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> > for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> > respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> > tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> > the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> > will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> > runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> > choice for the name.
> >
> > AjaMa
> > Epsilon
> > Erdos
> > Euclid
> > Euler
> > Gauss
> > JAML
> > Math
> > MathBlocks
> > MathComponents (or Math Components)
> > Mathelactica
> > MathModules
> > Megginson
> > modMath
> > Nash
> > Newton
> > Pythagoras
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-02 Thread Martin Grotle Soukup
I think Apache Math sounds most promising.

Best regards
Martin Grotle Soukup

2016-02-01 18:06 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz :

> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-02 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/01/2016 06:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
> 
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras

I am split between Epsilon and Math, both seem quite appealing to me.
Both choices are fine for me.

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

2016-02-02 Thread sebb
On 2 February 2016 at 13:39, Gilles  wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:53:53 +, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 2 February 2016 at 12:11, Ate Douma  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote:


 On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML



 This choice:

> Math



 can potentially lead to legal and/or technical problems:
   * name of the JAR will basically be "math.jar", easily clashing
 with local toolboxes (also named without much imagination)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> apache-math-x.y.z.jar
>
>
> Just, this is not the current naming:
> "bare" name -> bare.jar

Depends on the project.

Abdera, ACE, Ambari all use apache- prefixes, as do many others.

Others don't.

>>>
>>> will fix the name clashing trivially.
>>>
>>>
   * name of the project will obviously be impossible to protect
>>
>>
>> The name of the project will be
>>
>> Apache Math
>>
>> which *is* protectable.
>
>
> Then if unique names or acronyms that are easy to identify are no
> valuable arguments, we could have had
>
>ASL

Possibly; that would depend on the outcome of a name search.

>
> It's shorter than "Math", if that is really what people like in it
> (since no other good points were made AFAICT).
>
>> This is no different from many other ASF projects which use common
>> names that already have meanings.
>>
>> There are very few ASF projects whose bare names are protectable/protected
>
>
> Is it a good reason to add another one?
>
> Having a not already used and not likely to be used name can prevent time
> wasted later in trying to enforce the protection.

That's not the only work that would need to be done.

I agree it would be easier to enforce the name if it is sufficiently unique.
But enforcement is only a part of the workload - the project must
spend time checking whether there are misuses of the name.

That work is not necessary if the name is only used in conjunction
with the Apache prefix.

>
> Gilles
>
>

> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras



 The second objection of course holds for many names in the list.
 We'd better follow Bertrand's suggestion.


 Gilles
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



RE: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-02 Thread Patrick Meyer
Apache Math

-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

Please select your top choice among the following suggested names for the new 
[math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to respond.  This POLL will 
be open for 72 hours, at which time two tallies will be presented:  one among 
those who have volunteered for the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  
Hopefully, one name will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off 
another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML
Math
MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I vote for Apache Math Components.

2016-02-01 18:06 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz :

> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://home.apache.org/~britter/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-02 Thread Phil Steitz
My own vote is for Apache Math

Phil

On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

2016-02-02 Thread Gilles

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:53:53 +, sebb wrote:

On 2 February 2016 at 12:11, Ate Douma  wrote:

On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote:


On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:


Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered 
for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one 
name

will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML



This choice:


Math



can potentially lead to legal and/or technical problems:
  * name of the JAR will basically be "math.jar", easily clashing
with local toolboxes (also named without much imagination)



apache-math-x.y.z.jar


Just, this is not the current naming:
"bare" name -> bare.jar



will fix the name clashing trivially.



  * name of the project will obviously be impossible to protect


The name of the project will be

Apache Math

which *is* protectable.


Then if unique names or acronyms that are easy to identify are no
valuable arguments, we could have had

   ASL

It's shorter than "Math", if that is really what people like in it
(since no other good points were made AFAICT).


This is no different from many other ASF projects which use common
names that already have meanings.

There are very few ASF projects whose bare names are 
protectable/protected


Is it a good reason to add another one?

Having a not already used and not likely to be used name can prevent 
time

wasted later in trying to enforce the protection.


Gilles




MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras



The second objection of course holds for many names in the list.
We'd better follow Bertrand's suggestion.


Gilles



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-02 Thread James Carman
For the record, I really do like epsilon also.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:14 PM James Carman 
wrote:

> Apache Math
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM Phil Steitz  wrote:
>
>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>> choice for the name.
>>
>> AjaMa
>> Epsilon
>> Erdos
>> Euclid
>> Euler
>> Gauss
>> JAML
>> Math
>> MathBlocks
>> MathComponents (or Math Components)
>> Mathelactica
>> MathModules
>> Megginson
>> modMath
>> Nash
>> Newton
>> Pythagoras
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>


Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

2016-02-02 Thread sebb
On 2 February 2016 at 12:11, Ate Douma  wrote:
> On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>>> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>>> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>>> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>>> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>>> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>>> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>>> choice for the name.
>>>
>>> AjaMa
>>> Epsilon
>>> Erdos
>>> Euclid
>>> Euler
>>> Gauss
>>> JAML
>>
>>
>> This choice:
>>
>>> Math
>>
>>
>> can potentially lead to legal and/or technical problems:
>>   * name of the JAR will basically be "math.jar", easily clashing
>> with local toolboxes (also named without much imagination)
>
>
> apache-math-x.y.z.jar
>
> will fix the name clashing trivially.
>
>
>>   * name of the project will obviously be impossible to protect

The name of the project will be

Apache Math

which *is* protectable.

This is no different from many other ASF projects which use common
names that already have meanings.

There are very few ASF projects whose bare names are protectable/protected

>>
>>> MathBlocks
>>> MathComponents (or Math Components)
>>> Mathelactica
>>> MathModules
>>> Megginson
>>> modMath
>>> Nash
>>> Newton
>>> Pythagoras
>>
>>
>> The second objection of course holds for many names in the list.
>> We'd better follow Bertrand's suggestion.
>>
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

2016-02-02 Thread Ate Douma

On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote:

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:

Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML


This choice:


Math


can potentially lead to legal and/or technical problems:
  * name of the JAR will basically be "math.jar", easily clashing
with local toolboxes (also named without much imagination)


apache-math-x.y.z.jar

will fix the name clashing trivially.


  * name of the project will obviously be impossible to protect


MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras


The second objection of course holds for many names in the list.
We'd better follow Bertrand's suggestion.


Gilles


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



[Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

2016-02-02 Thread Gilles

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:

Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML


This choice:


Math


can potentially lead to legal and/or technical problems:
 * name of the JAR will basically be "math.jar", easily clashing
   with local toolboxes (also named without much imagination)
 * name of the project will obviously be impossible to protect


MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras


The second objection of course holds for many names in the list.
We'd better follow Bertrand's suggestion.


Gilles


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Apache Math

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Phil Steitz  wrote:

> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Christopher
Apache Math.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Otmar Ertl  wrote:
> Apache Math
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Ole Ersoy  wrote:
>> Apache Epsilon
>>
>>
>> On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> Apache Epsilon
>>>
>>>
 On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz  wrote:

 Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
 for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
 respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
 tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
 the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
 will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
 runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
 choice for the name.

 AjaMa
 Epsilon
 Erdos
 Euclid
 Euler
 Gauss
 JAML
 Math
 MathBlocks
 MathComponents (or Math Components)
 Mathelactica
 MathModules
 Megginson
 modMath
 Nash
 Newton
 Pythagoras





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>



-- 

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Otmar Ertl
Apache Math

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Ole Ersoy  wrote:
> Apache Epsilon
>
>
> On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Apache Epsilon
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz  wrote:
>>>
>>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>>> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>>> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>>> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>>> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>>> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>>> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>>> choice for the name.
>>>
>>> AjaMa
>>> Epsilon
>>> Erdos
>>> Euclid
>>> Euler
>>> Gauss
>>> JAML
>>> Math
>>> MathBlocks
>>> MathComponents (or Math Components)
>>> Mathelactica
>>> MathModules
>>> Megginson
>>> modMath
>>> Nash
>>> Newton
>>> Pythagoras
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Ole Ersoy

Apache Epsilon

On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:

Apache Epsilon



On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz  wrote:

Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML
Math
MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Bruce Johnson
Apache Epsilon


> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz  wrote:
> 
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
> 
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Gilles

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:

Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.



AjaMa


Gilles

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Evan Ward
I would prefer Apache Epsilon or Apache Math.

-Evan

On 02/01/2016 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Math

Bruno
 
  From: Phil Steitz 
 To: Commons Developers List  
 Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 6:06 AM
 Subject: [math] [POLL] new TLP name
   
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.  Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML
Math
MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


   


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 01/02/2016 18:06, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
> 
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras

First choice:  Apache Epsilon
Second choice: Apache Math

Luc

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Gary Gregory
Apache Math

Gary

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Phil Steitz  wrote:

> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

JUnit in Action, Second Edition 
Spring Batch in Action 
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory


Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread norm
Phil Steitz  writes:
>Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
>respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
>the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
>will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
>runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
>choice for the name.
>
>AjaMa
>Epsilon
>Erdos
>Euclid
>Euler
>Gauss
>JAML
>Math
>MathBlocks
>MathComponents (or Math Components)
>Mathelactica
>MathModules
>Megginson
>modMath
>Nash
>Newton
>Pythagoras

Math

Norman Shapiro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Apache Math

Le 1/02/2016 18:06, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
> 
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread James Carman
Apache Math

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM Phil Steitz  wrote:

> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
> the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
> will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
> runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
> choice for the name.
>
> AjaMa
> Epsilon
> Erdos
> Euclid
> Euler
> Gauss
> JAML
> Math
> MathBlocks
> MathComponents (or Math Components)
> Mathelactica
> MathModules
> Megginson
> modMath
> Nash
> Newton
> Pythagoras
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


[math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Phil Steitz
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP.  All are welcome and encouraged to
respond.  This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented:  one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all respondents.  Hopefully, one name
will emerge as consensus winner.  If not, I will kick off another
runoff poll among the top choices.   Please respond with your top
choice for the name.

AjaMa
Epsilon
Erdos
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
JAML
Math
MathBlocks
MathComponents (or Math Components)
Mathelactica
MathModules
Megginson
modMath
Nash
Newton
Pythagoras





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org