Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
+1 to the sandbox. Thanks Bryant. We should probably go ahead and create a separate part of the tree and stub out some of the 1.1 interfaces/changes as well. -Nick Bryant Luk To dev@cxf.apache.org 02/11/2010 09:08 cc AMwink-...@incubator.apache.org, Rick McGuire Subject Please respond to Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API wink-...@incubato JAR r.apache.org I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox. On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote: >> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF >> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a >> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache >> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 >> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are >> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact >> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think >> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS >> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. >> >> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just >> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating >> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 >> >> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to >> attach a patch to that Jira issue. > > Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/ > and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its > "ready". > > The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar > was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was > more or less ready. > > THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in- > jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs > obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and > we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To > switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed > as well. > > Dan > > > >> >> Rick >> >> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas > wrote: >> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks >> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see >> >> if they would be interested. >> >> >> >> +1 from me. >> >> >> >> -- dims >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me Bryant. >> >>> >> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I >> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming >> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. >> >>> >> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. >> >>> >> >>>
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox. On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote: >> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF >> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a >> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache >> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 >> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are >> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact >> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think >> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS >> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. >> >> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just >> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating >> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 >> >> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to >> attach a patch to that Jira issue. > > Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/ > and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its > "ready". > > The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar > was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was > more or less ready. > > THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in- > jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs > obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and > we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To > switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed > as well. > > Dan > > > >> >> Rick >> >> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas > wrote: >> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks >> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see >> >> if they would be interested. >> >> >> >> +1 from me. >> >> >> >> -- dims >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me Bryant. >> >>> >> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I >> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming >> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. >> >>> >> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. >> >>> >> >>> -Nick >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR >> >>> spec from geronimo? :) >> >>> >> >>> Davanum Srinivas >> >>> >> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM >> >>> >> >>> Please respond to >> >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> To >> >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >> >>> cc >> >>> >> >>> Subject >> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR >> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) >> >>> >> >>> -- dims >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk > wrote: >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo >> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider >> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven >> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote: > On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF > > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a > > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache > > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 > > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are > > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact > > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think > > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS > > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. > > Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just > hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating > this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 > > If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to > attach a patch to that Jira issue. Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/ and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its "ready". The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers.The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was more or less ready. THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in- jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed as well. Dan > > Rick > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks > >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see > >> if they would be interested. > >> > >> +1 from me. > >> > >> -- dims > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > >> > >> wrote: > >>> +1 from me Bryant. > >>> > >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I > >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming > >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. > >>> > >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. > >>> > >>> -Nick > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR > >>> spec from geronimo? :) > >>> > >>> Davanum Srinivas > >>> > >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM > >>> > >>> Please respond to > >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > >>> To > >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>> cc > >>> > >>> Subject > >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR > >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) > >>> > >>> -- dims > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo > >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider > >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven > >>>> repository that's Apache licensed. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > >> > >> -- > >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Eoghan, That's still not Apache licensed.It's just the Sun jar/code repackaged with OSGi stuff.The only thing Apache licensed in there is the new FactoryFinder. If SMX is calling the resulting jars Apache licensed, that's a REAL concern. They aren't. Dan On Thu February 11 2010 8:47:59 am Eoghan Glynn wrote: > Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec? > > Code here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/ > > Artefacts here: > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servic > emix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/ > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servi > cemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/ > > These are Apache licensed. > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire wrote: > > On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF > >> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a > >> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache > >> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 > >> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are > >> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact > >> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think > >> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS > >> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. > > > > Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't > > happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this > > support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 > > > > If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to > > attach a patch to that Jira issue. > > > > Rick > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas > > > >> wrote: > >>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks > >>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see > >>> if they would be interested. > >>> > >>> +1 from me. > >>> > >>> -- dims > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> +1 from me Bryant. > >>>> > >>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I > >>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming > >>>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. > >>>> > >>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. > >>>> > >>>> -Nick > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR > >>>> spec from geronimo? :) > >>>> > >>>> Davanum Srinivas > >>>> > >>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM > >>>> > >>>> Please respond to > >>>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> To > >>>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>>> cc > >>>> > >>>> Subject > >>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR > >>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) > >>>> > >>>> -- dims > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo > >>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider > >>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the > >>>>> Maven repository that's Apache licensed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Hi Eoghan, the resulting artifact has an OSGI Locator embedded. This may not be that bad in itself, but it includes some extra bits which non-OSGI consumers won't need and as briefly discussed on the Jersey list, it will 'force' all OSGI users which will depend on it to rely on a specific solution (which is good but it is a specific one nonetheless) to do with the use of the OsgiLocator... cheers, Sergey Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec? Code here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/ Artefacts here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/ http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/ These are Apache licensed. Cheers, Eoghan On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire wrote: On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: Hi, We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to attach a patch to that Jira issue. Rick On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see if they would be interested. +1 from me. -- dims On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: +1 from me Bryant. There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. -Nick Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) Davanum Srinivas 02/10/2010 02:40 PM Please respond to wink-...@incubator.apache.org To wink-...@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) -- dims On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: Hi, I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven repository that's Apache licensed. Thanks. -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec? Code here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/ Artefacts here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/ http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/ These are Apache licensed. Cheers, Eoghan On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF >> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a >> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache >> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 >> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are >> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact >> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think >> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS >> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. >> >> > > Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't > happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this support > yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 > > If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to > attach a patch to that Jira issue. > > Rick > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas >> wrote: >> >> >>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks >>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see >>> if they would be interested. >>> >>> +1 from me. >>> >>> -- dims >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> +1 from me Bryant. >>>> >>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I >>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've >>>> been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. >>>> >>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. >>>> >>>> -Nick >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR >>>> spec from geronimo? :) >>>> >>>> Davanum Srinivas >>>> >>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM >>>> >>>> Please respond to >>>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> To >>>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >>>> cc >>>> >>>> Subject >>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR >>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) >>>> >>>> -- dims >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo >>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider >>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven >>>>> repository that's Apache licensed. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: Hi, We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to attach a patch to that Jira issue. Rick On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see if they would be interested. +1 from me. -- dims On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: +1 from me Bryant. There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. -Nick Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) Davanum Srinivas 02/10/2010 02:40 PM Please respond to wink-...@incubator.apache.org To wink-...@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) -- dims On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: Hi, I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven repository that's Apache licensed. Thanks. -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Hi, We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks > like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see > if they would be interested. > > +1 from me. > > -- dims > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > wrote: >> >> +1 from me Bryant. >> >> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I don't >> know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've been >> contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. >> >> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. >> >> -Nick >> >> >> >> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR spec >> from geronimo? :) >> >> Davanum Srinivas >> >> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM >> >> Please respond to >> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >> >> To >> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >> cc >> >> Subject >> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR >> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) >> >> -- dims >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo >> > (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider >> > contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven >> > repository that's Apache licensed. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >> > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >
