Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 2.2.10

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:55 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:13 PM Thomas Watson  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Notice, I jumped up to version 2.2.10.  I updated the parent to the latest
> > 8 version.  That caused me some issues in producing the javadoc which I did
> > not run into until I was performing the release.  I had to fix that with
> > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/commit/d40368c853e486e63c2200a613613831ba8659a2
> > and re-spin a new release.
> >
> > Also, I had trouble with the  tags using https authentication during
> > the release.  I had to update the github URLs to scm:git:ssh://
> > g...@github.com/apache/felix-dev.git because github removed https
> > authentication so the release process could not do things like push up tags
> > etc.  I assume all other sub-projects should do the same with their 
> > tags.
> >
> > We solved 4 issues in this release:
> >   [FELIX-6616] - Dynamic greedy 1..1 references may activate with no
> > reference service bound
> >   [FELIX-6633] - Dynamic references may miss events while causing
> > deactivation
> >   [FELIX-6682] - Felix SCR - 3 TestCases fail in OSGi TCK
> >   [FELIX-6463] - Changing log levels for DS component getState and
> > registration
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1487/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1487 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Webconsole 4.9.6

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:47 AM Raymond Augé
 wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:32 AM Sagar Miglani  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Sagar
> >
> > > On 04-Oct-2023, at 11:47 AM, Carsten Ziegeler 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We solved 1 issue in this release
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6658
> > >
> > > Staging repository:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1476
> > >
> > > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > > signatures:
> > > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> > >
> > > Usage:
> > > sh check_staged_release.sh 1476 /tmp/felix-staging
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Carsten
> > > --
> > > Carsten Ziegeler
> > > Adobe
> > > cziege...@apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)
> OSGi Fellow, Java Champion

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Webconsole 4.9.4

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 5:11 AM Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Carsten
>
> On 08.09.2023 07:28, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 2 issues in this release
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6650?jql=project%20%3D%20FELIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20webconsole-4.9.4
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1473
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1473 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Webconsole 4.9.2 and webconsole plugins

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 6:08 AM Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Carsten
>
> On 02.09.2023 13:36, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 2 issues for the webconsole 4.9.2
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12353601
> >
> > 2 issues for ds webconsole plugin 2.3.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12353559
> >
> > 3 issues for ds webconsole plugin 1.2.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12341690
> >
> > 3 issues for memoryusage webconsole plugin 1.1.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12352183
> >
> > 2 issues for obr webconsole plugin 1.1.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12353574
> >
> > 2 issues for packageadmin webconsole plugin 1.1.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12339617
> >
> > 2 issues for http webconsole plugin 1.1.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12353554
> >
> > 2 issues for healthcheck webconsole plugin 2.2.0
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FELIX/versions/12353580
> >
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1471
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1471 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Webconsole 4.8.10

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le jeu. 20 juil. 2023 à 07:13, Carsten Ziegeler  a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved two issues in this release:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6614?jql=project%20%3D%20FELIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20webconsole-4.8.10
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1464/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1464 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Carsten
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > Adobe
> > cziege...@apache.org
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 4.2.8, Http Bridge 4.2.10 and Http Jetty 4.2.14

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:42 PM Karl Pauls  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Wednesday, July 19, 2023, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved two issues in these releases:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6608
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6618
> >
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1463/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1463 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Carsten
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > Adobe
> > cziege...@apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpa...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Healthcheck Webconsole Plugin 2.1.0

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:41 PM Karl Pauls  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2023, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > On 18.07.2023 13:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We solved one issue in this release:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6617
> >>
> >> Staging repository:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1462/
> >>
> >> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> >> signatures:
> >> https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >>
> >> Usage:
> >> sh check_staged_release.sh 1462 /tmp/felix-staging
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Carsten
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > Adobe
> > cziege...@apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpa...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix HC Generalchecks 3.0.6

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 6:50 AM Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved one issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6613
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1461/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:
> https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 1461 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Felix maven-bundle-plugin 5.1.9 release

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I submit maven-bundle-plugin 5.1.9 release to your vote.
> >
> > This release includes:
> > - fix a bug producing non-reproducible build
> > - minor warning fixes with maven 3.9.2 (still work to do to fix all)
> > - add skip parameter on the bundle goal (and inherited like manifest goal)
> >
> > You can take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12353241
> >
> > Maven Staging Repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1460/
> >
> > Dist Staging Repository:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/felix/maven-bundle-plugin-5.1.9/
> >
> > Git tag:
> > maven-bundle-plugin-5.1.9
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache Felix Log 1.3.0 release

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 9:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As discussed on the mailing list, I submit Apache Felix Log 1.3.0
> > release to your vote.
> >
> > This release upgrades to OSGi Log 1.5.0 spec.
> >
> > You can take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12353242
> >
> > Maven Staging Repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1459/
> >
> > Dist Staging Repository:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/felix/
> >
> > Git tag:
> > org.apache.felix.log-1.3.0
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix org.apache.felix.scr version 2.2.6

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:10 PM Raymond Augé
 wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:16 PM  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Wednesday, 18 January 2023, Thomas Watson  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We solved 1 issue in this release:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6581
> > >
> > > Staging repository:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1452/
> > >
> > > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > > signatures:
> > > https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> > >
> > > Usage:
> > > sh check_staged_release.sh 1452 /tmp/felix-staging
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Tom
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)
> OSGi Fellow, Java Champion

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR 2.2.4 release

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 4:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list, I'm submitting the Apache Felix SCR
> 2.2.4 release to your vote.
>
> We solved one issue on this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12352370
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1443/
>
> You can use this Unix script to download the release and verify the 
> signatures:
> https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 1443 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Maven Bundle Plugin 3.2.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Christian Schneider
 wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> m2e integration and bndlib 3.2.0 support are really great.
> I just tested on the cxf-dosgi build and found no regressions till now.
>
> Christian
>
> On 15.07.2016 07:56, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a vote for the maven bundle plugin
>>
>> We solved six issues in this release:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12335566
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1130/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1130 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix WebConsole 4.2.16

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Valentin Valchev 
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> On 31.5.2016 г. 10:44 ч., Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> We solved three issues in this 
> release:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.webconsole-4.2.16/changelog.txt
>
>
> Staging 
> repositories:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1122/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 1122 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Carsten
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>
> *Valentin Valchev*
>
> ProSyst Software GmbH
> Senior Project Manager
> Aachener Str. 222
> 50931 Cologne
> Germany
>
> *www.prosyst.com* 
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> Tel. +359 (0)2 952 35 81
> Fax +359 (0)2 953 26 17
> *v.valc...@prosyst.bg* 
>
> Registered office: Köln, Register court: Amtsgericht Köln HRB 54586
> Executives: Dr. Rainer Kallenbach, Thomas Hott, Daniel Schellhoss, Dr.
> Dimitar Valtchev
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix File Install 3.5.4

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 3:22 PM,   wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 1 April 2016 at 16:03,  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on the Felix File Install 3.5.4
>>
>> The following issues were solved since 3.5.2:
>> FELIX-4934 Only log failures for consistently failing bundles
>> FELIX-5218 Fileinstall MemoryLeak / Performance degradation in
>> WatcherScanner
>> FELIX-5217 Fileinstall is handling removal of many files inefficiently
>> FELIX-5209 [FileInstall] use framework bundle location to get framework
>> bundle
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1119
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1119 /tmp/felix-fileinstall-check
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David Bosschaert
>>
>>

Re: [Discuss] Develop OSGi Converter Service in Apache Felix?

[Jamie G.]

Have you had a look at Apache Camel's type converter
http://camel.apache.org/type-converter.html might be some useful code
in there towards your efforts.

Conversion as a Service could be useful.

-J

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:31 PM,   wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In OSGi work is being done to define a Converter service. The current
> working draft can be found here:
> https://github.com/osgi/design/tree/master/rfcs/rfc0215
>
> I have started prototyping an implementation of this in my personal github
> project: https://github.com/coderthoughts/converter
>
> However, it would obviously be nicer to do the implementation an a proper
> opensource project, so I'm looking for a home work this work.
> Apache Felix would be a good place IMHO as this will be another generally
> useful OSGi component. Another place could be Apache Aries, but I was
> initially thinking of Felix because this is not really an 'Enterprise'
> component.
>
> How would people feel if I would contribute my current very small codebase
> with no dependencies to the Felix project and continue development here?
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Utils 1.8.2, FileInstall 3.5.2, EventAdmin 1.4.6

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/19/2016 08:55 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> 2016-01-15 11:27 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet :
>>
>>> I'd like to call a vote for those 3 artifacts :
>>>- Felix Utils 1.8.2
>>>- FileInstall 3.5.2
>>>- EventAdmin 1.4.6
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12329700/
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12329699/
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333240/
>>>
>>> Staging repositories:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-/
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1112/
>>>
>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>>> signatures:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh  /tmp/felix-staging
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1112 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Script Console Plugin 1.0.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> +1
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix http.base 3.0.4, http.bridge 3.0.4, and http.jetty 3.1.4

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Benson Margulies
 wrote:
> Yes, I was surprised to get three links to the same list.
> On Nov 26, 2015 9:00 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"  wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/26/2015 02:46 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 26 November 2015 at 13:09, Carsten Ziegeler 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 We solved some issues for this release:

 http.base 3.0.4 (4 issues)
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333777

 http.bridge 3.0.4 (4 issues)
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333779

 http.jetty 3.1.4 (6 issues)
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333778

 Staging repository:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1105/

 You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
 signatures:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh

 Usage:
 sh check_staged_release.sh 1105 /tmp/felix-staging

 Please vote to approve this release:

 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)

 This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
 Regards
 Carsten
 --
 Carsten Ziegeler
 Adobe Research Switzerland
 cziege...@apache.org

>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Felix Dependency Manager Release Candidate R6

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:22 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 22 November 2015 at 16:28, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would like to call for a vote on the Dependency Manager toplevel release
>> R6.
>>
>> It is a maintenance release before the new DependencyManager-lambda
>> scheduled for the next version.
>> The following issues were solved:
>>
>> Release Notes - Felix - Version org.apache.felix.dependencymanager-r6
>>
>> ** Bug
>> * [FELIX-4974] - DM filter indices not enabled if the dependencymanager
>> bundle is started first
>> * [FELIX-5045] - DM Optional callbacks may sometimes be invoked before
>> start callback
>> * [FELIX-5046] - Gradle wrapper is not included in DM source release
>>
>> ** Improvement
>> * [FELIX-4921] - Ensure binary equality of the same bundle between
>> successive DM releases
>> * [FELIX-4922] - Simplify DM changelog management
>> * [FELIX-5054] - Clean-up instance bound dependencies when component is
>> destroyed
>> * [FELIX-5055] - Upgrade DM to BndTools 3.0.0
>> * [FELIX-5104] - Call a conf dependency callback Instance with an
>> instantiated component
>> * [FELIX-5113] - Remove useless wrong test in
>> ConfigurationDependencyImpl
>> * [FELIX-5114] - Schedule configuration update in Component executor
>> synchronously
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/dependencymanager/release/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh r6 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> This script, unlike the original Felix check_stage_release.sh, is specific
>> to the new Dependency Manager release process (see FELIX-4818) and will
>> download staging from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/felix instead
>> of http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories.
>>
>> To rebuild the DM binaries from the source, you can then refer to
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/dependencymanager/release/resources/src/README.src
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours (no less :-))
>>
>> Thank you;
>>
>> yours
>> /Pierre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Coordinator 1.0.2

[Jamie G.]

+ 1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> +1
>
> Verified signatures, rebuilt the binary from the source which I tested with
> subsystem.
>
> /Pierre
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:30 PM,  wrote:
>
>> Anyone else interesting in casting a vote? We need two more binding
>> votes here...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 9 November 2015 at 09:28,   wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm calling a vote on the Felix OSGi Coordinator version 1.0.2. The
>> > coordinator implements chapter 130 of the OSGi Enterprise specs.
>> >
>> > The following issues were fixed since 1.0.0:
>> > FELIX-5086 Coordinator.begin can return null
>> > FELIX-5065 Coordinator should provide osgi.service capability
>> >
>> > Staging repository:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1102
>> >
>> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> > signatures:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >
>> > Usage:
>> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1102 /tmp/felix-coordinator-check
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > David Bosschaert
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Bundle Plugin version 3.0.1

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Benson Margulies
 wrote:
> Thank You. Perhaps I will change that doc page to mention that a PMC
> member might be required.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Stuart McCulloch  wrote:
>> No worries, I’ve just added your key and confirmed it matches the one used 
>> to sign the artifacts
>>
>> On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 12:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> No can do with the signature. As a mere committer, I can't commit to
>>> the dist area. Only PMC members can do that.
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>> mQINBEzDDl0BEADHvJW2uff8vfxbfy0IvNOK4aytU+HVEvKEmuSqYEzC8i3BF6RT
>>> LOxTeRFlu92rYz5ypD0mdNCzQaH0xbkcjialP6FpPCByrM9fFv6hmxZFSY71rvqz
>>> Aw606I0t9rt94wc6p5Rl8NIso4rbFp2VQeu9hiydtyc5b6xh5mcCb2tYuihfByuL
>>> ozt0ZWHDk1tZJk/XhSDVZ84jHrWRY2zSa2laIxH+KnJFto8BkTxQgrwEL1ipzoJr
>>> n3DMIWOtWQR7hdSGWA/V+FgA4I7HXMXVrxolt5FesiWUXkZ7mVjglExv6Mwmf48V
>>> TFfx46fz8vO6q93XQV705p2Csam78tvAMNYkJs2xZ9iaFIE8ET2cMgPie9yXlqTL
>>> JGFRoFnTDM4HVW2hU6DsS7OAv0TjxZ94VPElrIrp7sK8MMe9+3qkTQkvUvLmbDOH
>>> +i0LBw3ULKrod1oNe9VU8wyBBOaB5WqCfdjMWQoNb0IbgTXOyRRfO7YgA+KTtta1
>>> H91I8x15aW1ofnEjYDvrXmaScCVMJcaas/62XjlKlmwGJMcS69pVRlxdKGLjBDA4
>>> dg5gnZ+O/L792UwHOjuuqU3ix65xQ1t9Xrw5QsvTEhHLmbaJIrK9cT0UYvtUR/em
>>> LJ7uVQOjL0PLnFGwntc0B0JldWT11oAtOV1rHgTrRn+HQzC6bTxx6eQlYQARAQAB
>>> tClCZW5zb24gTWFyZ3VsaWVzIDxiaW1hcmd1bGllc0BhcGFjaGUub3JnPokCNwQT
>>> AQoAIQUCTMMOXQIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRCcT36dmLHM
>>> U2/KEACGKZVYVaSarUBdnZGpkgBEcdVxQulcPuAO6cK8omLesMJ365XFsFsWkDQY
>>> TaOMsmoeuuhZw4IHf5M99BT0hPctdRAlrR5x2amWyOWrYUvutPVUrVFtC9W1tPn4
>>> VVf50r3hxrwIkNY5Ib7ynyCZL4N/4ExazvsRmKnu6KALvqcmyBZPal1MLaICo1k3
>>> wVJ8KCE84oja4BPgF4hDMrOh1JKEYtjaowCIJRZEZ29sBbkX1fEDl9c6Z78U37KT
>>> 3asaPqS13CGsapQ99b9LrBVqXpbmZ+y3SwU+G8TU5RnitRUF9T9+JYD6jHgUM344
>>> qeAE8TMsd4C2n5cfEaAiwVuQ0u2ulxlw1VjUC3NaycSHcoPOehYdlD3IFE1QmwwA
>>> XLbLVeCd27RxJ9+kLHsijdHUtwIaqmyC+qBXGof+NikpA+UHA1kgbW8MFgb1QRYN
>>> DJWFQdIgB6H43pW7KxKT2fULYCUeOvt8nST+4X/YZwclAw5Cets2vtVcLvS5BdGz
>>> +ANOyppjKH7DzWzYtnamMdS24i50zQu97vtaoijT3f4wW+dMP+mlusQ651+9rCcz
>>> TXHYkHg9lKw9hy+jdphJPVTMH+QDkcJSsDFpi7k53iLHFcf2YwqK1BiYKoJXd6GH
>>> FbjybE6c8nNfPywzhSKpM34UNY8EV/14sDonjBLQLnr4Z3NrWLkCDQRMww5dARAA
>>> 9qZSA8fGWEppVjhJcJ7oFPzSeAEFeU0z/lASN6E6AaV75n63eQgx00s//2s+ty99
>>> tqp7a5giIhbSaH1EHQ71xBGalXBirWJnCf5/OkYIgoZUWovveNQHGANXjh6qKfwy
>>> qe9SmWnMn28146LNXKxU/YO+UyYy1AC+0R/Woe5funUmv7db6q/y/+KC9Wbmue+M
>>> HtAbFqDf07Gvp4rSNeSY97jki6dl9bfS5d/ofcvziBM4KCgalGaxTvYT6UI11i03
>>> YnW57WjtOstIZuJ1q1f8CC3OzTHRMwzoxLKmkfKXzEBxz9eM3fk3zYA6OTdSTOWl
>>> 0akvAiPr2CW4pr3MvwHYw9wEAqWJwadQmBDCCLhRlOzqD4WIJA1C3y7vYtxI2OWf
>>> wiUqtIantAr296vsamuhoiNXAG+GlpYaKasKLr/s7kHcdpH5oD2DkdVUiZHB2xs1
>>> ZjlgpafG71wHDiNKlJokJ4nZpQOoyDCXEdzr5uOz4fJ5Du4PUgG5y74Cu1JHZ0uJ
>>> Le65D+MT2TmmiFeQHhT9Txdk2AVgf5uQjHDcIAvMI0niehT+l3zZ4YtRBviRksG4
>>> 349OecTu+33JoJGqtYnOcuPUR8HBB2dQrPK/l47SUg6esF5duznU4XkNskvbBWu3
>>> 2aiakTz7XiDm0TEzWtBS/hMRIeH4IyjNux8CwEJfV/MAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQoACQUC
>>> TMMOXQIbDAAKCRCcT36dmLHMU2u/D/4umQeJcH06a2aM2ETXNVqDK29yti1tCSqs
>>> 0jsZivZrK+O+oxqvTzcocYtQ2Fb8WjexGpQ41wN5zocH85cCPD+UisziV4r0NQYK
>>> p1FhAJfkacIR4EtuEQrH2J7m4IDUXSqTW1jv36lXrAO/5ON07Wy3AROoJdFwrtO8
>>> ja0jX7Z+pe6OaLmptGSFeANSXN6r4CdGYtLh3s5Srf9++WTl+llMLEMfwbAHPSXt
>>> NV7zoq8j1UwI444W9C4DnVNBiku1e42pQUFt3BtEg22mW/1RdhOHUsisxE3hyUtN
>>> E2zCpu7Un5aedt5W72WozbAb0LPlUx/0fXyPLFNQmBMHeMVnxZb7CvraBo6BGHL4
>>> karbJBX2p+5s05/g8t5ljPbfakGNcUZRqbCk1neOQZYOiW8vI1FBbwGWiFWTISHQ
>>> d+uj/eQTWiQsz4+e3PAVZ4ekDYAMS1HLLXaBwxr7MHRIHRVVKJI8mFbI9HfGKpPt
>>> HDx+C47QkbQgPu1YL85g5mHkoP621r79zyGjW35HS2l4TCnUZ3q+WLvLMLpIsYcW
>>> YNBshwOavdSYmk9lCSSCtilTjl1e0E4WOGtusJKpmkAphOkjFKttCE6Z0mSHenLP
>>> numenORuE0/O7DgoihMrYzTTaRBkHLssIzfaPu96jcWjU9dhuxFW5AktUshr2RLw
>>> EaWfWeQZ4Q==
>>> =b8+3
>>> -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Stuart McCulloch >> (mailto:mccu...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>>> > +1 verified with a couple of local projects, source release looks good
>>> >
>>> > Remember to add your public key to http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS:
>>> >
>>> > http://felix.apache.org/documentation/development/release-management-nexus.html#appendix-a-create-and-add-your-key-to-httpwwwapacheorgdistfelixkeys
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers, Stuart
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 11:44, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > We solved 3 issues:
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12333631&styleName=Text&projectId=12310100&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C0a2bd62f03263e903089dc8019574717effb605c%7Clin
>>> > >
>>> > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2322?jql=project%20%3D%20FELIX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22Maven%20Bundle%20Plugin%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>> > >
>>> > > Staging repo:
>>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Coordinator 1.0.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM,   wrote:
> Here's my +1
>
> David
>
> On 9 November 2015 at 09:28,   wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on the Felix OSGi Coordinator version 1.0.2. The
>> coordinator implements chapter 130 of the OSGi Enterprise specs.
>>
>> The following issues were fixed since 1.0.0:
>> FELIX-5086 Coordinator.begin can return null
>> FELIX-5065 Coordinator should provide osgi.service capability
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1102
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1102 /tmp/felix-coordinator-check
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David Bosschaert

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Webconsole Subsystems plugin 0.1.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:09 AM,   wrote:
> Here's my +1
>
> David
>
> On 9 November 2015 at 09:47,   wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote on a 0.1.0 (beta) release of the subsystems
>> plugin for the Felix Webconsole.
>> This plugin adds support for managing OSGi subsystems to the Felix
>> Webconsole. While this plugin is not completely mature yet, this 0.1.0
>> release will make it easier for other communities to start playing
>> with the plugin and provide feedback.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1103
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1103 /tmp/felix-subsystemwebconsole-check
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David Bosschaert

Re: [VOTE] framework 5.4.0 and related subproject releases (take 2)

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
> Hi;
>
> thanks for releasing;
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> BR
> /Pierre
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Jan Willem Janssen <
> janwillem.jans...@luminis.eu> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On 13 Oct 2015, at 17:37, Karl Pauls  wrote:
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Tested the signatures, and played around with the main distribution. All
>> seems fine.
>> So, a +1 (binding) from me.
>>
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>>
>> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
>> +31 631 765 814
>>
>> My world is revolving around INAETICS and Amdatu
>>
>> Luminis Technologies B.V.
>> Churchillplein 1
>> 7314 BZ   Apeldoorn
>> +31 88 586 46 00
>>
>> http://www.luminis-technologies.com
>> http://www.luminis.eu
>>
>> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
>> BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Base 3.0.2, Http Bridge 3.0.2, and Http Jetty 3.1.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik  wrote:
> +1
> fre. 9. okt. 2015 kl. 17.43 skrev David Bosschaert <
> david.bosscha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 9 October 2015 at 16:15, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>> >
>> > Http Base 3.0.2 - 4 issues solved
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333076
>> >
>> > Http Bridge 3.0.2 - 4 issues solved
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333282
>> >
>> > Http Jetty 3.1.2 - 5 issues solved
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333135
>> >
>> > Staging repositories:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1098/
>> >
>> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> > signatures:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >
>> > Usage:
>> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1098 /tmp/felix-staging
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Carsten
>> > --
>> > Carsten Ziegeler
>> > Adobe Research Switzerland
>> > cziege...@apache.org
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix WebConsole 4.2.14

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

I think that's a reasonable assumption regarding src vs binary users.

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> Am 03.10.15 um 07:57 schrieb Pierre De Rop:
>> Indeed ! wow ! we only have the problem when building with java8; and not
>> with java7; that is odd.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> However, according to the apache release process, I think that binary
>> artifacts are only produced as convenience for users , and source artifacts
>> are more important than binaries; So, I think that when sending the
>> announce your should then mention the fact that the source release must be
>> only built using java7 and not java8.
>>
> Makes sense, yes, I'll do that - though I guess 99% of our users use the
> binary :)
>
> Regards
> Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Gogo Shell 0.12.0 and Command 0.16.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> I assume this is due to a very old parent pom - or a misconfiguration in
> that parent pom. Should really be easy to fix.
>
> Carsten
>
> Am 02.10.15 um 19:14 schrieb David Jencks:
>> I’d vote for just moving to a gradle/bndtools build….
>>
>> A little experimentation suggests that the maven-bundle-plugin 2.4.3 used in 
>> command can’t produce source jars whereas the 1.4.3 version used in shell 
>> can.  the 2.4.3 version produces this output:
>>
>> [INFO] --- maven-source-plugin:2.0.4:jar (default-cli) @ 
>> org.apache.felix.gogo.command ---
>> [WARNING] NOT adding sources to artifacts with classifier as Maven only 
>> supports one classifier per artifact. Current artifact 
>> [org.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.gogo.command:bundle:0.16.0] has a [] 
>> classifier.
>>
>> instead of making the requested jar.
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Benson Margulies  wrote:
>>>
>>> I could take a look at this for the next iteration.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:41 PM, David Jencks
>>>  wrote:
 Hi David,

 Well, I was sort of hoping you’d figure out a way to release the sources 
 bundle too :-).  However I can create my own for my needs.  I’ve now 
 tested the fixes I added and they seem to work, so, at long last,

 +1

 thanks
 david jencks


> On Oct 1, 2015, at 6:25 PM, dav...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I didn't change the build process for these artifacts, so I guess they
> were released like this before. In any case, the important artifacts
> are there. We can change the produced artifacts for a future release,
> but I don't think this is important enough to cancel this one.
>
> BTW I can't count your email as a +1 or -1, so please indicate how you
> actually vote here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On 1 October 2015 at 18:19, David Jencks  
> wrote:
>> sigs look good, I can build the project tar.gzs.
>>
>> The selection of artifacts looks a bit bizarre to me.  I don’t see a 
>> sources bundle for org.apache.felix.gogo.command-0.16.0 and I can’t 
>> imagine what the bin artifacts are for.  Is this all intentional?
>> I’d really prefer there be a 
>> org.apache.felix.gogo.command-0.16.0-sources.jar
>>
>> thanks for undertaking this release :-)
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:42 AM, dav...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm calling a vote on the following bundles:
>>>
>>> Felix Gogo Shell 0.12.0
>>> ** Improvement
>>>  * FELIX-5021 [GOGO] Use system bundle to find bundles
>>>  * FELIX-4529 [Gogo] Let gosh be configured by files contributed by
>>> a bundle fragment
>>>  * FELIX-3341 Simple csh-like Command History
>>>  * FELIX-3340 Allow the prompt to be a Function
>>>
>>> ** Bug
>>>  * FELIX-4425 Short command in Gogo Shell not working with Java 8
>>>  * FELIX-3706 gogo shell startup failure in busy system
>>>  * FELIX-3703 Race condition in gogo runtime activator
>>>
>>> Felix Gogo Command 0.16.0
>>> ** Improvement
>>>  * FELIX-5021 [GOGO] Use system bundle to find bundles
>>>  * FELIX-5009 Relative URIs would be nice for install and update
>>>  * FELIX-5008 gogo usage messages could be less confusing
>>>  * FELIX-3499 felix:cd command works only with relative paths
>>>
>>> ** Bug
>>>  * FELIX-4969 cd refuses to leave initial directory
>>>
>>> Note that not changes have been made to the Felix Gogo Runtime bundle
>>> since the last release.
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1096
>>>
>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>>> signatures:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1096 /tmp/felix-gogo-check
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> David Bosschaert
>>

>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Bundle Repository (OBR) 2.0.6

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix maven-bundle-plugin 3.0.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Simon Chemouil  wrote:
> +1!!! (non-binding) :-)
>
> Le 22/09/2015 13:14, dav...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on the Felix maven-bundle-plugin release 3.0.0.
>>
>> The following issues were resolved:
>> FELIX-5047 Disable bnd ScrPlugin by default
>> FELIX-5030 Do not require a pom.xml when Polyglot Maven is used
>> FELIX-5029 Update to bnd 3.0.0
>>
>> Especially the update to bnd 3.0.0 brings many fixes and improvements,
>> including support for OSGi Enterprise R6 DS annotations and Metatype
>> annotations.
>>
>> Given the nature of the new features this release has its version
>> increased to the next major version.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1095
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1095 /tmp/felix-mbp-check
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David Bosschaert
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Web Console version 4.2.12

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/18/2015 09:36 AM, Valentin Valchev wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to release the next version of Apache Felix Web Console.
>> We solved 9 issues in this release:
>>
>> ** Bug
>>  * [FELIX-2880] - The Webconsole does not handle
>> Vector
>>  * [FELIX-3366] - The Configuration Webconsole Plugin seems to
>> ignore the ocd ref element
>>  * [FELIX-4849] - Do not call setContentLength after calling
>> sendRedirect
>>  * [FELIX-4995] - NPE when updating Apache Felix OSGi Management
>> Console configuration without a password
>>  * [FELIX-5004] - Null is passed to BundleInfoProvider if plugin
>> root is null
>>  * [FELIX-5031] - NPE in Web Console configuration plugin when
>> metatype service is missing
>>  * [FELIX-5041] - Cannot build web console with JDK 1.8 due to
>> javadoc problems
>>
>> ** Improvement
>>  * [FELIX-5018] - [webconsole] "create factory configuration" link
>> for config screen
>>  * [FELIX-5019] - [webconsole] "referer" parameter for configuration
>> open/create link
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1093/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1093 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> --
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>>
>> *Valentin Valchev*
>>
>> ProSyst Software GmbH
>> Senior Project Manager
>> Aachener Str. 222
>> 50931 Cologne
>> Germany
>>
>> _www.prosyst.com_ 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> Tel. +359 (0)2 952 35 81
>> Fax +359 (0)2 953 26 17
>> _v.valchev@prosyst.bg_ 
>>
>> Registered office: Köln, Register court: Amtsgericht Köln HRB 54586
>> Executives: Dr. Rainer Kallenbach, Thomas Hott, Daniel Schellhoss, Dr.
>> Dimitar Valtchev
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix DS WebConsole Plugin

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Valentin Valchev 
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> On 16/09/2015 11:55, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject release:
>
> ds webconsole plugin 2.0.2
>
> We solved three 
> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333162
>
> Staging 
> repositories:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1089/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 1089 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Carsten
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>
> *Valentin Valchev*
>
> ProSyst Software GmbH
> Senior Project Manager
> Aachener Str. 222
> 50931 Cologne
> Germany
>
> *www.prosyst.com* 
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> Tel. +359 (0)2 952 35 81
> Fax +359 (0)2 953 26 17
> *v.valc...@prosyst.bg* 
>
> Registered office: Köln, Register court: Amtsgericht Köln HRB 54586
> Executives: Dr. Rainer Kallenbach, Thomas Hott, Daniel Schellhoss, Dr.
> Dimitar Valtchev
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http Sslfilter 1.0.4

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:30 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 14 September 2015 at 08:58, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject release:
>>
>> http sslfilter 1.0.4
>>
>> We solve one issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5027
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1085/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1085 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:28 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 16 September 2015 at 10:51, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject release:
>>
>> scr 2.0.2
>>
>> We solved three issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333075
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1088/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1088 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix SCR Compat 1.0.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:28 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 16 September 2015 at 10:55, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject release:
>>
>> scr compat 1.0.2
>>
>> We solved one issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333139
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1087/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1087 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Metatype 1.1.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/10/2015 10:53 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately I didn't catch a regression in the 1.1.0. This one fixes
>> it, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5000
>>
>>
>> Staging repository
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1081/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1081 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Metatype 1.1.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:39 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 6 August 2015 at 19:18, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> This metatype release implements the R6 version of the metatype spec.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12332142
>>
>>
>>
>> Staging repository
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1078/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1078 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Eventadmin 1.4.4

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:39 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 6 August 2015 at 20:01, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> We solved four issues in this release
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12328642
>>
>>
>>
>> Staging repository
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1080/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1080 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Configadmin 1.8.8

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:40 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 6 August 2015 at 19:50, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> We solved three issues in this release
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12332748
>>
>>
>>
>> Staging repository
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1079/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1079 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Webconsole 4.2.10

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:03 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 13 July 2015 at 15:00, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>> We have solved two issues for this release:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12329691/
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1075/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1075 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org

Re: A new webconsole plugin for OSGi subsystems

[Jamie G.]

Nice :)

Where can we view the screenshot?

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently working on a Webconsole plugin for subsystems. The idea
> is quite similar to the bundles page: you can list, start, stop,
> inspect etc the OSGi subsystems in your system.
>
> I was thinking that it might make sense to add this plugin to the
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/webconsole-plugins/subsystems
> location. What do people think? Does is make sense to add the plugin
> here?
>
> It's currently work-in-progress, but some very basic functionality
> already works (see screenshot). Rather than doing a big bang
> contribution, I'd prefer to contribute an early version and improve on
> it in the Felix codebase.
>
> Thoughts anyone?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> PS I also though about potentially contributing it to Apache Aries,
> since it provides a Subsystems implementation. However the plugin can
> work with any subsystems impl so it might be better located with the
> 'generic' webconsole plugins at Felix...

Re: How to download everything for felix-dist?

[Jamie G.]

At Karaf we basically just copy over the artifacts from nexus staging
to apache, where we then svn add & checkin the resources.

We're only working with a few dozen files however per release. Not
sure if there is anything automated out there...

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:12 PM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> Hmmm, I guess nobody has a smarter way to do this ;) So I went ahead
> and did my manual thing again... I guess I could write a little shell
> script to do it...
>
> I uploaded the artifacts (configadmin 1.8.6) to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/felix and updated the
> content/downloads.list in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/site/trunk but the downloads
> page is still listing the old version of configadmin. What other
> action do I need to take to update that page?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 3 June 2015 at 13:06, David Bosschaert  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just wondering how other people do this. To put a release on
>> felix-dist I used to download the artifacts by hand from Maven
>> Central. This is kind of labour intensive since there are a lot of
>> artifacts per release. Does anyone know of an easier way to do this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Connect 0.1.0 (2nd cut)

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Karl Pauls  wrote:
> +1
>
> Sigs and hashes check out for me, connect starts up, and I was able to run
> gogo.
>
> Otherwise, it looks like we are missing the copyright year in the Notice
> and might have to double check the copyright years in the Dependencies but
> at least the headers etc. look ok.
>
> Thanks for getting this done!
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>
>> I've cut another release of Felix Connect 0.1.0
>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.connect
>> -0.1.0/
>>
>> This new attempt fixes FELIX-4901 and FELIX-4903.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1069
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1069 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpa...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Http-sslfilter 1.0.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 non binding.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:34 AM, clement escoffier
 wrote:
> +1,
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
>
> 2015-05-02 14:51 GMT+02:00 Carsten Ziegeler :
>
>> Anyone else?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Carsten
>>
>> Am 29.04.15 um 16:50 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We solved 2 issues in this release:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12332243
>> >
>> >
>> > Staging repository:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1067/
>> >
>> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> > signatures:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >
>> > Usage:
>> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1067 /tmp/felix-staging
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Carsten
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring work on resolver / framework to trunk

[Jamie G.]

+1 Cool :)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks a lot for this great work !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/13/2015 11:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> Those past days, I've worked again on FELIX-4656 (resolver memory and
>> speed
>> improvements) and also picked up FELIX-4525 (use the resolver in the
>> framework).
>> The results of this work can be seen at
>> https://github.com/gnodet/felix/commits/resolver-and-framework
>>
>> The resolver improvements is mostly optimizations given by more specific
>> data structures for the resolver (both in terms of cpu usage and memory),
>> and with a few additional tweaks to the resolver algorithm to avoid the
>> resolution of the same state from multiple branches of the solution tree.
>>
>> The work on integrating the resolver was mostly done by David Bosschaert,
>> I
>> just picked it up and fixed the dynamic wiring which was broken and the
>> few
>> remaining failures in the CT.
>>
>> The resulting framework passes all the OSGi Core CT tests (those that do
>> not include security), so unless anyone objects, I'm planning to bring
>> those changes into trunk.
>>
>>
>> Thoughts welcomed !
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release webconsole-4.2.8, webconsole-useradmin-plugin-1.0.2 and webconsole-upnp-plugin-1.0.6

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
> +1
>
> regards;
> /Pierre
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Valentin Valchev 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> There are 3 new releases waiting for your approval:
>>
>> * webconsole-4.2.8
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12329340&styleName=Text&projectId=12310100
>>
>> * webconsole-useradmin-plugin-1.0.2
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12329243&styleName=Text&projectId=12310100
>>
>> * webconsole-upnp-plugin-1.0.6
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12329242&styleName=Text&projectId=12310100
>>
>>
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1057/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1057 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Valentin
>>
>> --
>>
>> -
>> Valentin Valchev · Lead Software Engineer
>> ProSyst Labs EOOD
>> 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria · 48 Vladajska Str.
>> Tel. +359 (0)2 952 35 81; Fax +359 (0)2 953 26 17
>> http://www.prosyst.com · v.valc...@prosyst.bg
>> -
>> stay in touch with your product.
>> -
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] framework 4.6.1 and related subproject releases

[Jamie G.]

+1 non-binding

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:00 AM, clement escoffier
 wrote:
> +1,
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
>
> 2015-03-03 13:21 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet :
>
>> +1
>>
>> 2015-03-03 11:26 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls :
>>
>> > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>> >
>> > framework  4.6.1
>> > main 4.6.1
>> > main.distribution 4.6.1
>> >
>> > The main changelog is in jira and at:
>> >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.framework-4.6.1/doc/changelog.txt
>> >
>> > Staging repositories:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1053
>> >
>> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> > signatures:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >
>> > Usage:
>> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1053 /tmp/felix-staging
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release gogo runtime 0.14.0

[Jamie G.]

+1

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:40 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1 I like it!
>
> David
>
> On 15 October 2014 18:19, Achim Nierbeck  wrote:
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards, Achim
>>
>> sent from mobile device
>> Am 15.10.2014 18:57 schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" :
>>
>>> +1 for me (non binding)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>>  Original message 
>>> From: Guillaume Nodet 
>>> Date:15/10/2014  18:44  (GMT+01:00)
>>> To: dev@felix.apache.org
>>> Cc:
>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release gogo runtime 0.14.0
>>>
>>> I'd like to release gogo runtime 0.14.0
>>>
>>> ** Bug
>>> * [FELIX-4637] - Gogo can't cope without several commands with defined
>>> service.ranking
>>>
>>> ** New Feature
>>> * [FELIX-4671] - Provide an expression parser
>>>
>>> The first issue is when you end up with several functions with the same
>>> scope/name registered at the same time.  Gogo now tracks them properly and
>>> use service ranking to choose the one to execute.
>>>
>>> The second one provides an expression parser activate by (( xxx )) in which
>>> arithmetic operators, assignments, comparisons (numeric or string) can be
>>> done easily.
>>> A few raw examples are provided in the test below:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/felix/blob/051a3ee00b2df87ba787056e5423bdea9f95b17d/gogo/runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/gogo/runtime/expr/ExpressionTest.java
>>>
>>> Coupled with a while loop command taking 2 closures as arguments, one could
>>> now execute the following:
>>>
>>> karaf@root()> a = 0 ; while { ((a < 10)) } { echo $a ; ((a += 1)) }
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that I haven't provided support for ++ and -- operators, but that
>>> could be added later.  The += and -= operators can be used as a workaround.
>>>
>>> Please have a look and try it, I'd like to release it asap.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>

Re: [equinox-dev] fileinstall & equinox solution

[Jamie G.]

FileInstall and Equinox should be able to play nicely together - that
combination has been used in Apache Karaf deployments for a while...

Could you try out your scenario with a Karaf container with Equinox
set as its OSGi core?

--J

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Raymond Auge  wrote:
> Ok, so I did have:
>
> a) some fileinstall artifact handlers in a bundle being refreshed
> b) config admin bundle being refresh
>
> Both of those would probably have pulled FI into the fresh.
>
> However, I removed those (and delete the equinox state) but still get the
> same exact issue.
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Raymond Auge 
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, sooo I think I understand the issue.
>>
>> We have a protocol handler deployed for fileinstall's custom artifact
>> handling.
>>
>> I guess that must be pulling FI into the fresh.
>>
>> I'll take that bundle out and see if I get the same problem or not.
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Raymond Auge 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry I forgot to mention I'm cross posting to felix list also.
>>>
>>> Anyhow, here is a stacktrace which shows the locking (search for
>>> fileinstall).
>>>
>>> - Ray
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:57 PM, BJ Hargrave 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Is there a bug/issue with the details? I don't know any details here.
 What is the "concurrency issue with package refresh"?
 --

  *BJ Hargrave*
 Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
 OSGi Fellow and CTO of the *OSGi Alliance* 
 *hargr...@us.ibm.com* 

 office: +1 386 848 1781
 mobile: +1 386 848 3788





 From:Raymond Auge 
 To:Equinox development mailing list ,
 Apache Felix Developers 
 Date:2014/09/29 12:52
 Subject:[equinox-dev] fileinstall & equinox solution
 Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
 --



 Will there ever be a solution to the fileinstall on equinox issue?

 It seems that fileinstall has not worked on equinox for some time due to
 the concurrency issue with package refresh.

 I believe 3.1.10 is the last version that works on equinox.

 --
 *Raymond Augé* 
  (@rotty3000)
 Senior Software Architect
 *Liferay, Inc.*  (@Liferay)
 ___
 equinox-dev mailing list
 equinox-...@eclipse.org
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
 from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


 ___
 equinox-dev mailing list
 equinox-...@eclipse.org
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
 from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Raymond Augé* 
>>>  (@rotty3000)
>>> Senior Software Architect
>>> *Liferay, Inc.*  (@Liferay)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Raymond Augé* 
>>  (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect
>> *Liferay, Inc.*  (@Liferay)
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* 
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect
> *Liferay, Inc.*  (@Liferay)

Re: [VOTE] Release FileInstall 3.4.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non binding)
Signatures all checked out good as well.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Achim Nierbeck
 wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> 2014-09-11 14:25 GMT+02:00 Carsten Ziegeler :
>
>> +1
>>
>> 2014-09-11 14:10 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>>
>> > +1 (non binding)
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> >
>> > On 09/11/2014 09:23 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >
>> >> We solved 2 issues in this release:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> >> projectId=12310100&version=12328349
>> >>
>> >> Staging repository:
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1037
>> >>
>> >> The tag is available at:
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.
>> >> felix.fileinstall-3.4.2/
>> >>
>> >> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> >> signatures:
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >>
>> >> Usage:
>> >> sh check_staged_release.sh 1037 /tmp/felix-staging
>> >>
>> >> Please vote to approve this release:
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >>
>> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > --
>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > jbono...@apache.org
>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziege...@apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web  Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog 
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master

Re: Introducing myself :)

[Jamie G.]

Welcome to Apache Felix :)

If you find any issues please report it on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX and supply patches, also
if you have not already, please fill out your ICLA
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Freddy Guime  wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
>
>
> I'm Freddy Guime and wanted to help developing the Apache Felix project. Bob
> Paulin has been encouraging me to help with the project, and he was telling
> me this is a great group to join and help.
>
>
>
> My background is in financial applications (algorithmic trading / high
> frequency trading software). I also work with Swing, front-end UIs as well.
> With Bob we run the javapubhouse.com podcast, and have helped write the Java
> 7/8 Recipes book with Josh Juneau (and co.), and (with Bob) we are the local
> user group leaders . In all pretty excited to get involved in this apache
> project.
>
>
>
> Bob was pointing me to the event admin just to see what could be done in
> terms of performance/cleaning up so I'm taking a quick peek.
>
>
>
> Let me know if you have any questions for me.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Freddy Guime
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [ANN] Welcome David Bosschaert to the Apache Felix PMC

[Jamie G.]

Congrats David!

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> The Apache Felix PMC is pleased to announce that David Bosschaert is now
> part of our PMC.
>
> Regards
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Felix OBR WebConsole Plugin 1.0.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards;
> /Pierre
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 07/22/2014 10:02 AM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I ran the check_staged_release.sh script and all the signatures are good.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 22 July 2014 07:37, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>>>
 +1

 Carsten


 2014-07-22 8:13 GMT+02:00 Carsten Ziegeler :

  Hi,
>
> we solved two issues for this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12321848
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1029
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 1029 /tmp/felix-staging
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>   [ ] +1 Approve the release
>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org
>
>


 --
 Carsten Ziegeler
 Adobe Research Switzerland
 cziege...@apache.org

>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>

Re: [VOTE] DependencyManager 3.2.0 and related subprojects release

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> +1
>
>
> 2014-07-14 17:02 GMT-07:00 Stuart McCulloch :
>
>> +1  signatures and RAT report all check out - verified you can build the
>> release from the project zip
>>
>> On 13 Jul 2014, at 19:22, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
>>
>> > Hello everybody,
>> >
>> > It's time for me to try to do my first release (many thanks to Chetan,
>> > Stuart, and Marcel for their help).
>> > So I'm calling a vote on the following artifacts, which is a maintenance
>> > release for dependencymanager:
>> >
>> > org.apache.felix.dependencymanager-3.2.0
>> > org.apache.felix.dependencymanager.shell-3.2.0
>> > org.apache.felix.dependencymanager.runtime-3.2.0
>> > org.apache.felix.dependencymanager.annotation-3.2.0
>> >
>> > We solved the following issues in this release:
>> >
>> > FELIX-3910: Race conditions in DependencyManager
>> > FELIX-4334: ServiceDependency properties change callback issue
>> > FELIX-4285: Remove abstract modifier from
>> DependencyActivatorBase.destroy()
>> > FELIX-4294: Dependency Manager Shell improvements
>> > FELIX-4305: DependencyMananer Adapters - service properties propagation
>> > FELIX-4002: ComponentStateListener.started is invoked twice when the
>> > listener is added in the start method.
>> > FELIX-4395: DependencyManager Configuration Dependency does not clone
>> some
>> > class fields.
>> > FELIX-4014: handleAspectAwareRemoved in ServiceDependencyImpl can cause a
>> > possible deadlock
>> > FELIX-4097: Allow debug logging for specific instances of service
>> > dependencies to debug wiring issues.
>> > FELIX-4098: Aspect swap sometimes invokes the callbacks in the wrong
>> order
>> > in a multithreaded application.
>> > FELIX-4099: Add support for negations in the multi property filter index.
>> > FELIX-4186: NPE in DependencyManager Logger
>> > FELIX-4226: Add option to have the dependency manager log against a
>> single
>> > BundleContext's LogService.
>> > FELIX-4361: Possible ConcurrentModificationException in
>> > DependencyManager.getComponents()
>> > FELIX-4050: Named dependencies are not injected if new dependencies are
>> > added at init phase.
>> > FELIX-4233: Race condition in dependency manager runtime SerialExecutor.
>> > FELIX-3869: Fragment support for DependencyManager-Component
>> > FELIX-4357: Support types beside String/String[] in @Property annotation.
>> > FELIX-3873: Make the reference to json.org consistent in DM artifacts
>> > FELIX-3996: Upgrade to latest bnd version
>> > FELIX-4352: Extend shell command to give better insight in where the
>> > problem is
>> >
>> > Other outstanding issues will be addressed later, possibly in the
>> upcoming
>> > Dependency Manager 4.0.
>> >
>> > Staging repository:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1028
>> >
>> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> > signatures:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >
>> > Usage: sh check_staged_release.sh 1028
>> > 
>> > /tmp/felix-staging
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for 72 hours (at least).
>> >
>> > best regards;
>> > /Pierre
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix maven-bundle-plugin version 2.5.0 (second attempt)

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch  wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2014, at 09:54, Grzegorz Grzybek  wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> I did a test with latest fabric8 and all went well after little
>> modification:
>> We had this default:
>>
>>!*
>>
>> But it seems that it resulted in empty JARs - the above setting overrode
>> io.fabric8.xxx*
>> Shouldn't we use Export-Package with higher priority?
>
> AFAICT nothing has changed in the bundleplugin wrt. Private-Package (compared 
> to bundleplugin 2.4.0), but it could be a consequence of the upgrade to bnd 
> 2.3.0
>
>> After changing this to:
>>
>>
>>
>> all went fine.
>>
>> regards
>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-23 20:52 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 I’ve fixed the issue reported in http://www.mail-archive.com/
 us...@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have restaged the 2.5.0
 release...

 We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the bndlib 2.3.0
 upgrade to support Java 8 bytecode and a new baselining feature:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
 version=12324606&styleName=Html&projectId=12310100

 There are still several outstanding issues which people can contribute
 towards fixing :)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component+%
 3D+%22Maven+Bundle+Plugin%22+AND+project+%3D+FELIX+AND+
 resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC

 Release source tag:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/maven-
 bundle-plugin-2.5.0/

 Staging repository:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
 orgapachefelix-1024/

 You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
 signatures:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_
 release.sh

 Usage:

sh check_staged_release.sh 1024 /tmp/felix-staging

 Please vote to approve this release:

 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)

 This vote will be open for 72 hours.

 —
 Cheers, Stuart


>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Also checked signatures.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:52 AM,   wrote:
> Here's my +1 on this.
>
> Anyone else wants a Repository 2.0.2 release?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 23 June 2014 16:09,   wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.2.
>>
>> It's been a long time since the OBR has been released, and since it
>> now also provides the OSGi Repository API 1.0 I think this warrants a
>> version of 2.0.x. Note that the exported packages are semantically
>> versioned.
>> This release replaces failed release attempt for version 2.0.0 which
>> failed the vote because of omissions in the DEPENDENCIES and NOTICES
>> files. I have also added the sources using the maven-source-plugin to
>> this release.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1025/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1025 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Changes:
>> New Feature:
>> * [FELIX-4368] - Support OSGi Repository 1.0 Specification
>> ** [FELIX-4369] - Support repository.xml as defined by OSGi Repository spec
>> ** [FELIX-4370] - Support Repository service as defined by OSGi spec
>> ** [FELIX-4371] - Pass the Repository 1.0 OSGi CT
>>   -> The results of the OSGi Repository CT can be found here:
>>   
>> http://people.apache.org/~davidb/felix_obr_2.0.0/TEST-org.osgi.test.cases.repository-5.0.0.xml
>>
>> Bug fixed:
>> * [FELIX-3257] - OBR resolver unable to pick up the highest bundle
>> version when selecting the best candidate
>> * [FELIX-2465] - system.bundle should be automatically wired to the
>> relevant bundle
>> * [FELIX-3842] - NPE in LocalRepositoryImpl
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David Bosschaert

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Gogo Command bundle version 0.14.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:47 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1 from me too.
>
> David
>
> On 20 June 2014 15:40, Jan Willem Janssen  
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 17/06/14 13:45, dav...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide
>>> specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> +1, looks good.
>>
>> - --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>>
>> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
>> +31 631 765 814
>>
>> /My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/
>>
>> Luminis Technologies B.V.
>> J.C. Wilslaan 29
>> 7313 HK   Apeldoorn
>> +31 88 586 46 30
>>
>> http://www.luminis-technologies.com
>> http://www.luminis.eu
>>
>> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
>> BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTpEfWAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc4YcoP/Reg1p5stYyl6Wi4/NkIsC/W
>> zMzQmnI/biPuUTDaGkud9ZuDF6XnDs2Mv3n8MmAMVLWPDCtWp36M71tt2dst2zi6
>> Z0x6wgFRRLhM/oSK1qQplWRzesn+CVRflq0qfl+l2GK+mFgaFARP7c9u+ef8pqqF
>> 8ziW4YOHW6N47gRsAboa8e1KMzAzMgcePOBRK2uvdR3IVT6e/s1awfv0rzEmmoOV
>> mt7KDIGSf8eybWNpG+sWHHeT1mEkP4Myp9lQdXNKZnBdADa6FBl8JaBeaGT4jCC1
>> OdGPaGCJq81Tn1nv9rvmOMbL+a65QipcG2RAfFIFHnEoZOpLD4dUdjOD8IKXcNWt
>> YCUnYB7fqako9NmBxzVFujpbscwqm3kim5//CTSsMJCb98fj1QFWAyfczNSnK5tm
>> RiMD3H9ds98f7N4TZWVaY0ivYak48PPrVxV5LhPtxpA5WkKHmHVeeNluW8LKdrn9
>> gcoAdZ532XZr3mu0L+U5TVgqWMGeK4y56Yw0vLjx6yUH0vbZaNwUmPb3xxgHnVrd
>> HGZoYXJ2a4Lor+tQH0xQkWAaTK/2+4OjjPQcyg8DPIP7iAWGr2dIfYjgs7+zOsN6
>> LyULPtnaAat5grusxKaBPhI/jWsXvvybCdwUdopPeXFqiiNCQKwafM40DmDptZnL
>> 8DEleyh7M4koxKmG5FRm
>> =DxBH
>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Gogo Runtime 0.12.1

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Pierre De Rop  wrote:
> Hi Guillaume;
>
> +1
>
> regards
> /Pierre
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>
>> I'm calling a vote on Felix Gogo Runtime 0.12.1.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1020/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1020 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Changes:
>> ** Bug
>> * [FELIX-4533] - Gogo runtime does not advertise published services
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix HTTP version 2.3.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Jan Willem Janssen
 wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 13 issues in this release, see [1] for a complete list.
>
> There are still some outstanding issues, see [2].
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1019/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 1019 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours (at least).
>
>
> 1.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FELIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20http-2.3.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22HTTP%20Service%22
>
> 2.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FELIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22HTTP%20Service%22
>
> - --
> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>
> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
> +31 631 765 814
>
> /My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/
>
> Luminis Technologies B.V.
> J.C. Wilslaan 29
> 7313 HK   Apeldoorn
> +31 88 586 46 30
>
> http://www.luminis-technologies.com
> http://www.luminis.eu
>
> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
> BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTkeTrAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc4iGkQANaTdHwv3Kx81Aiuw94H3hLT
> RtVpSCA0q8jlGzq93t6SndSBMbcuqV6dVRpbJDzcMfae/naxnN+HHivxsIeZ1WlC
> 4mDats1vDinJIyaMZDTTVWp+fayNsZDZs/AtjgpZkJVSic7s3nyXbZi2esge9DUJ
> 3xdZkq1rslVysBK9qtpzlxJQTm8gdXhW9vwH9L++CWyNOlf17dytdpKP+QTCIQ/D
> cp98cwv6kXRX8pRu0d8H3Y4Yy02oOKk42tblRYaJQtNTIedJOAKg/fOBJIwq5kj5
> h3tLnBY780SNejX7ZCNtuWXE6Zy7VV48ukhfV7x7HjHPaAprBBn7WMCDHO42w5dl
> oc2rSQ5oVUX550gvtapKXgZLChKHjo1ZgxfbHLkJKTG+DBVvI1PqVXd5FbA8njas
> TYX3DY2URpCS0+pZQTxE/FLp79P13+zCrXW4onnDfuDNmQ+lsFc1kGHWLLyiWc8k
> 7qvfbMueUf6GY/aX0/0Vn1gJIVVV6O6w8XMAHa+LYyRyceFJR/H/9j44WH3SQzbp
> 0YEtNiLJ2B+mbAGf3ARydfZiZkgSc9P4AiKSNNxbVmZ49Pc+FiJPYt5WNukM76M0
> m4KD+ejxe0RUHlx9eDhNxLzLnlBrCwYle0C5d/63hJITioVuJYZQ7BldBBL96mRb
> 6s8zNVElG8+fxy4+d/cK
> =Yl2h
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [VOTE] SCR Tooling Release

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Clement Escoffier
 wrote:
> +1,
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
> On 19 mai 2014, at 14:15, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This vote is about adding java 8 support to our SCR tool chain.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4461
>>
>> It consists of the following releases:
>>
>> SCR Generator 1.10.0
>> Maven SCR Plugin 1.17.0
>> SCR Ant Task 1.11.0
>> Bnd SCR Plugin 1.1.0
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1018/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1018 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ]  0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> cziege...@apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 0.11.0

[Jamie G.]

Strange, the original email was on mina dev list. Didn't notice it had
changed :S

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Clement Escoffier
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I may be wrong, but wouldn’t it be better to send this mail to the Mina 
> mailing list instead of the Felix one ? Not sure you get the 3 binding votes 
> here…
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
> On 14 avr. 2014, at 14:41, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>
>> 2014-04-14 13:53 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet :
>>
>>> Vote to release the 0.11.0 version of SSHD
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849&version=12326277
>>> Staging repository:
>>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1002
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, wrong url.  Correct one is:
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1003/
>>
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>>
>>
>>> Distributions:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1003/org/apache/sshd/apache-sshd/0.11.0/
>>> Tag:
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina-sshd.git;a=tree;hb=76f67974cb30921c7162cac1cb2874656070aff0
>>>
>>> This release contains no major new features but a buch of bug fixes and a
>>> few improvements.
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> Please review and vote.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>
>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release FileInstall 3.4.0

[Jamie G.]

+1. Also ran the check signatures and digests scripts, everything passed.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
> I'd like to propose a release of FileInstall 3.4.0.
>
> The artifacts are located in
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1015/
>
> Release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12325677
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage: sh check_staged_release.sh 1015 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve these releases:
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours (at least).
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 0.11.0

[Jamie G.]

+1. All of the gpg, md5, and sha1 signature and digests checks passed.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
> 2014-04-14 13:53 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet :
>
>> Vote to release the 0.11.0 version of SSHD
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849&version=12326277
>> Staging repository:
>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1002
>>
>
> Sorry, wrong url.  Correct one is:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1003/
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
>
>>  Distributions:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1003/org/apache/sshd/apache-sshd/0.11.0/
>> Tag:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina-sshd.git;a=tree;hb=76f67974cb30921c7162cac1cb2874656070aff0
>>
>> This release contains no major new features but a buch of bug fixes and a
>> few improvements.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> Please review and vote.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Gogo Runtime 0.12.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Jan Willem Janssen
 wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26/02/14 12:14, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> Changes: ** Bug * [FELIX-4336] - The use of inheritable thread
>> locals in ThreadIO can cause problems ** Improvement * [FELIX-3590]
>> - Add system property resolution to CommandSessionImpl *
>> [FELIX-4363] - The CommandSession get/set methods are not thread
>> safe
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide
>> specific comments)
>
> +1
>
> One remark: the o.a.f.gogo.commands project currently fails to compile
> using Maven. However, this is, as far as I can see, not because of the
> changes in the runtime project.
>
> - --
> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>
> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
> +31 631 765 814
>
> /My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/
>
> Luminis Technologies B.V.
> J.C. Wilslaan 29
> 7313 HK   Apeldoorn
> +31 88 586 46 30
>
> http://www.luminis-technologies.com
> http://www.luminis.eu
>
> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
> BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTDztSAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc4cX0P/1x207QQAGDLPKFrboiTaLbl
> tu/h8Ovy8HrX0rdz7JGfDI+lZV4YhkZZDhQVWdBh+RrURYwPna2Sic+AnMineJM2
> q+3NOrodIz3v9f/zyVlxzJBOOra78eFjEK6ZvtMp28qhMOIfhItz0H6Di5xhPQsC
> Omb4YcFePUQB2WcKhsJfNSffwxf4rLDn7sl7ETFcLz8C3ukeOqZhvGMnF3ukEo2q
> YRX+ELHnzdGvCBpMvvQTnCpcmr8cajotxAdEYnouPQx9kl87a9zvVo2SWmVs0gjb
> g+YR/Q7E3I2zE8DuAwvkH+T2J2CXmZlz3hGuwlD0KSodbt1Gj8ijBF9W96CWzGkn
> FxfBbebp9hDqKXBKYQezd5tuH9NqE8g86UR2YG0ww/6MVCxRgGMN7vXndAyXTROd
> vXDsFBhEr9AMDTB7SKI7QaZjr5z0PLJXsvh/3cGSB9rvzTDrgwIG2Zt5Kb21+ar8
> xhmorijK0zyv9cMZxoc+R5JZfSSuLrDJSfiM3xK4LSADx5iPqc/svtE0KFAJ6g2z
> pctOB6b4OCz4UJfyKiYiLTZ2T2jEVPVh4cFtIm2td8BhsXmJvWAf0VPfTqxkNFtC
> px6NOY0jUL7cJ3klQ/njzWRebjogDBvxhiRwA8uMnScq74xOFUTPNuwX99LcLzC1
> ovbWQnDPjR4IGlkN1wcr
> =Vk2t
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Utils 1.6.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Jan Willem Janssen
 wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26/02/14 12:12, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide
>> specific comments)
>
> +1
>
> - --
> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>
> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
> +31 631 765 814
>
> /My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/
>
> Luminis Technologies B.V.
> J.C. Wilslaan 29
> 7313 HK   Apeldoorn
> +31 88 586 46 30
>
> http://www.luminis-technologies.com
> http://www.luminis.eu
>
> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
> BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTDzolAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc46ikP/0+guyJVL1bMWoe+9ar/ySYw
> 0NsnZ+AbwmUeJ5HkdU0saP1R36rDiJkfP8XdowWA7XZ9LDvPAR0XJ825kpCP+o3C
> OvvVI40QQcq69A7atp/F+lbFOjpSMvSI+bmxAKz9jxUoi85KrpSurfDxQ3ePAF/N
> tpiz5W8O5mKjLrG4NpnWtCOMEoKKtcE3xrZjG12jQFeNichWAUQrsSGlkmStFtwR
> 6dbCVAxwR45kcHGV7bHcnus0UQY75RWsckMC6Kx5n2e0IzY5WmDmLUcnaqQW2wDW
> 2hvnSTlVkEEFQDB8NSWqPPjnyHpTAG3txS0jZJwaV0IqUGiPWhOm4cZhWNrLTAIy
> 6Kg4SXSrfpYaQmAsP6V52w8ttvu/n6U7Mj/iznBZ3u78EekToLFrN6EOUsLSdEeC
> CWb2eD/xPM2itunL5ho4E378NAj1H5UiAolXNDmkXWBoUWyP3lC2Ke4EDmk7KXQ5
> yDK2WAmSUoFMwy70dbQFJfXYTvGKrhccrLc+C5C8MijiJgKu1UozdBG+t9hJJ+9t
> hwTIRSiL2X6LBQknVL6x/iNTkmgkfdlbKnKEKl2dGnOcFPrdHWjW4/088EMVTkT/
> TmvMIe3tl3xIAGb2rTMoTC2hCLVe8voT7hnFzdbzN/t6Fu+JLriF4WY3u9aAJaUU
> MWpBW4Syh2+d1cLtZcex
> =yOtb
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [VOTE] Apache Felix Inventory 1.0.4

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 02/27/2014 02:05 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on Felix Inventory 1.0.4 which fixes one regression:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4437
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1009
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1009 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Changes:
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release of Script Console Plugin 1.0.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

--Jamie


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 22.07.2013 um 16:58 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra:
>
> > I would like to call a vote on the initial release of the Apache Felix
> > Script Console Plugin. For details on how to use it refer to
> >
> http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-script-console-plugin.html
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-001/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 001 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > Initial Release 1.0.0
> > -
> >
> > ** Improvement
> >* [FELIX-4122] - Felix Script Console Plugin. Initial import
> >
> > Chetan Mehrotra
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Script Console Plugin 1.0.0

[Jamie G.]

Ran the check staged repo scripts, things looked ok.

Do you have a link to the tag so i can source build test?


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Chetan Mehrotra  wrote:

> I would like to call a vote on the initial release of the Apache Felix
> Script Console Plugin. For details on how to use it refer to
>
> http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-script-console-plugin.html
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-001/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 001 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Initial Release 1.0.0
> -
>
> ** Improvement
> * [FELIX-4122] - Felix Script Console Plugin. Initial import
>
> Chetan Mehrotra
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix maven-bundle-plugin version 2.4.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

-Jamie


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2013/6/9 Stuart McCulloch 
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 18 issues in this release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12316680
> >
> > There are still some outstanding issues:
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FELIX%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22Maven%20Bundle%20Plugin%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open
> >
> > Release source tag:
> >
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/maven-bundle-plugin-2.4.0/
> >
> > Staging repository:
> >
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-005/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> >
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> >
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 005 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Stuart
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web  Committer &
> Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
> Commiter & Project Lead
> blog 
>

Re: [VOTE] framework 4.2.1 and related subproject releases

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie Goodyear

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Sahoo  wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> On Saturday 09 March 2013 03:28 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>>
>> framework  4.2.1
>> framework.security 2.2.0
>> main 4.2.1
>> main.distribution 4.2.1
>>
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-007/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 007 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Configuration Admin 1.6.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Ken Gilmer  wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks,
> ken
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Carsten
>>
>> 2012/10/22 David Bosschaert :
>> > +1 (non binding)
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > On 20 October 2012 11:36, Felix Meschberger  wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Here is the Apache Felix Configuration Admin 1.6.0 release implementing
>> the most recent Configuration Admin Specification Version 1.5.
>> >>
>> >> The issues completed in this release are listed in the release notes at
>> (also attached at the end of this message):
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12320945
>> >>
>> >> Staging repository:
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-144/
>> >>
>> >> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >>
>> >> Usage:
>> >> sh check_staged_release.sh 144 /tmp/felix-staging
>> >>
>> >> Please vote to approve this release:
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1 Release
>> >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>> >>
>> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >> ** Bug
>> >> * [FELIX-3532] - Source artifact is not being generated
>> >> * [FELIX-3596] - Config Admin should track
>> >>  SynchronousConfigurationListeners
>> >> * [FELIX-3721] - Configuration not always provided upon
>> >>  initial service registration
>> >> ** Improvement
>> >> * [FELIX-3577] - Refactor helpers and service trackers
>> >> * [FELIX-3622] - ConfigurationManager.listConfigurations
>> >>  may not always properly log the
>> >>  configuration PID
>> >> ** Task
>> >> * [FELIX-3479] - [Config Admin 1.5] Implement
>> >>  Configuration.getChangeCount()
>> >> * [FELIX-3480] - [Config Admin 1.5] Implement support for
>> >>  SynchronousConfigurationListener
>> >> * [FELIX-3481] - [Config Admin 1.5] Implement support for
>> >>  Targeted PIDs
>> >> * [FELIX-3483] - [Config Admin 1.5] Export cm API at version 1.5
>> >> * [FELIX-3554] - Prevent same configuration to be delivered
>> >>  multiple times
>> >> * [FELIX-3562] - Use OSGi Configuration Admin 1.5 API classes
>> >> * [FELIX-3578] - ConfigAdmin Maven build does not have Maven
>> >>  convention *-sources.jar artifacts
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> cziege...@apache.org
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release fileinstall 3.2.6

[Jamie G.]

+1 (Non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:48 AM, David Bosschaert
 wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> David
>
> On 27 September 2012 13:16, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>>
>>> We solved 2 issues in this release:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12321748
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-038/
>>>
>>> The tag is available at:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.fileinstall-3.2.6/
>>>
>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>>> signatures:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 038 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> 
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> 
>>> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> 
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
>> http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] framework 4.0.3 and related subproject releases

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Karl Pauls  wrote:
> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>
> framework  4.0.3
> main 4.0.3
> main.distribution 4.0.3
>
>
> Staging repositories:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-001/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 001 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)

Re: Change of PMC Chair

[Jamie G.]

Congrats!
On Jun 23, 2012 8:47 AM, "Felix Meschberger"  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Upon recommendation of the Felix PMC the Apache Board of Directors on its
> last meeting appointed me to be the chair of the Apache Felix PMC.
>
> It is a pleasure for me take over from Richard.
>
> I would like to thank Richard for the long hard work he put into this.
> This is going to be a really hard ride for me to get up to his level.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> PS. In case someone's wondering, more details about the PMC chair role can
> be found at [1].
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Utils 1.2.0 and Felix FileInstall 3.2.4

[Jamie G.]

+1 (Non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Rob Walker  wrote:
> +1
> - Rob
>
>
> On 12/06/2012 9:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> I've uploaded those two releases to the following staging area:
>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-225/
>>
>> In Utils, there has been one improvement and one new feature
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12319940&styleName=Html&projectId=12310100&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7Cd88ae502b88bad1700dff41293afe539ea654a26%7Clin
>>
>>
>> In FileInstall, we've fixed 3 bugs and one improvement:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12320776&styleName=Html&projectId=12310100&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7Cd88ae502b88bad1700dff41293afe539ea654a26%7Clin
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 225 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Ascert - Taking systems to the edge
> r...@ascert.com
> +27 87 550 1701
> www.ascert.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Configuration Admin version 1.4.0

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Felix Meschberger  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 01.06.2012 um 20:20 schrieb Richard S. Hall:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Not that it matters too much to me, but don't we normally include a
>> Maven source JAR in our releases? I don't see one here.
>
> Yes, we do.. Hmm, will look into why this happened.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>> On 5/30/12 09:20 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a vote on version 1.4.0 of the Felix Configuration Admin Service 
>>> implementation. The corner stones of this release a re compliance with the 
>>> latest Configuration Admin Service specification (version 1.4 as published 
>>> in Compendium 4.3 specification).
>>>
>>> At the same time, this is basically the same code, which is also used as 
>>> the reference implementation for the Configuration Admin 1.4 specification. 
>>> As such this release, of course also passes the CT for the Configuration 
>>> Admin 1.4.
>>>
>>> The main big difference to earlier releases of this bundle is, that this 
>>> build requires a Java 5 or newer platform to run because the embedded OSGi 
>>> classes are compiled for Java 5 and are using generics. Great care has 
>>> nevertheless been taken to not actually require Java 5 platform or API 
>>> features. So, after recompiling the OSGi classes and this bundle using the 
>>> target "jsr14" this bundle is expected to run on Java 1.4 compliant 
>>> platforms.
>>>
>>> The next release coming soon will implement version 1.5 of the 
>>> Configuration Admin specification to be published in the upcoming 
>>> Compendium 5 specification.
>>>
>>> We solved 22 issues in this release:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&version=12316414
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-157/
>>>
>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>>> signatures:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 157 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 4.0.0 and plugins

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Felix Meschberger  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 01.06.2012 um 20:33 schrieb Richard S. Hall:
>
>> +1
>>
>> No changelog in OBR plugin.
>
> Right. I added it after cutting the release.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>> On 6/1/12 11:45 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a large vote on the Web Console and a number of plugins extracted 
>>> from the web console or updated since the last release.
>>>
>>> I bumped the Web Console to version 4 because it now only comes in the 
>>> "bare" variant. That is the JSON and Commons FileUpload dependencies are 
>>> not part of the Web Console bundle any longer and must be installed 
>>> separately. For JSON, the Geronimo JSON bundle may be used while the 
>>> Commons FileUpload library already comes as a bundle.
>>>
>>> In addition a number of plugins have been ripped out of the Web Console 
>>> into separate bundles: DS and OBR. The Memory Usage plugin has been 
>>> updated. The Package Admin and UPnP plugins are new plugins.
>>>
>>> Here are the links to the JIRA fixed versions:
>>>
>>> Web Console 4.0.0
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12316160
>>>
>>> DS Plugin 1.0
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12317872
>>>
>>> Memory Usage Plugin 1.0.4
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12314875
>>>
>>> OBR Plugin 1.0
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12317956
>>>
>>> PackageAdmin Plugin 1.0.0
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12316672
>>>
>>> UPnP Plugin 1.0.2
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12314879
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-174/
>>>
>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>>> signatures:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 174 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (due to weekend and large 
>>> number of artifacts).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>

Re: [VOTE] Release FileInstall 3.2.2

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

2012/4/18 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 3.2.0

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> +1
>
> Carsten
>
> 2012/3/26 Felix Meschberger :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is the Apache Felix Web Console 3.2.0 release. Besides a number of bug 
>> fixes and improvements this release drops the full build and makes the bare 
>> build the only one available. To install the Web Console, three additional 
>> dependencies must now also be installed: Commons IO, FileUpload, and JSON 
>> (e.g. the Geronimo JSON bundle).
>>
>> We have fixed 43 issues in this release:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12316160
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-117/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 117 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release FileInstall 3.2.0

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Felix Meschberger  wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 19.03.2012 um 15:07 schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Given the number of improvements, I've chosen to upgrade to a new
>> minor release instead of a micro one.
>>
>> Please take some time to test as there has been important improvements
>> that could (hopefully not) lead to regressions.
>>
>> We solved 18 issues in this
>> release:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12316135&styleName=Html&projectId=12310100
>> There are still 6 outstanding
>> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22File+Install%22+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-091/
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 091 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>>
>> --
>> 
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> 
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
>> http://fusesource.com
>

Re: File Install Imrovements

[Jamie G.]

Thank you for raising the issues and providing patches.

Could you attach the patches to the related Jiras and set the ASL
license grant? Generally most projects like to keep there patches with
their related Jiras for book keeping (makes it easier to find said
patches than searching email threads if we had to go back looking for
them).

Thanks again :)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Albert Devs  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using Karaf in a development setup for it's hot deployment.
> During my coding, I noticed a few annoyances in the File Install
> component and set out to fix those.
>
>
> I've attached a patch ("fileinstall-lognstartlvl.patch") which changes
> the following things:
>
> - By default, the component produces no log output. I would expect
> that errors are important enough that they should be offered to the
> logging system, hence I changed DirectoryWatcher to default to
> LOG_ERROR.
> - If a Configuration from the config-admin contains no log settings, I
> altered the code to use the global log level as a default. Vice versa,
> a Configuration can still override the global log level.
> - Stuff like corrupt bundles may simply go unnoticed because those are
> logged as warnings. I've altered the logging level for non-recoverable
> situations to see everything of interest as an error.
> - When I configured the "felix.fileinstall.start.level" setting, the
> component wouldn't run update or refresh when the framework's start
> level is too low. I've introduced a new setting
> "felix.fileinstall.active.level" to configure the scan behaviour, e.g.
> so you can set it higher than the system bundle start-level so that
> the framework bundles resolve first. By default, the file install
> component now always updates, irregardless of the
> "felix.fileinstall.start.level" setting.
> - The bundle start level is now only set when a bundle is installed
> and not every time a bundle gets restarted. I'd expect that a user
> should be able to override the bundle start level instead of it being
> reset each time the file install component triggers a bundle start.
>
> The logging stuff is filed in issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3373 , whereas the start
> level stuff is filed as
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3346 .
>
>
> Due to my changes, the tests started to fail. I added some code to the
> setup method so that the bundle context expects certain getProperty
> calls.
> While I was at it, I've also updated them to use the EasyMock 2 API -
> now they no longer show those annoying deprecated warnings in Eclipse.
> The second patch ("fileinstall-easymock2.patch") includes these changes.
>
>
> Both patches are made against the trunk version. For the record, my
> ICLA recently got filed with the Apache foundation, and I agree to
> release these changes under the ASL v2.
>
> If there are any comments after reviewing both patch files, just let me know.
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> Bert Jacobs

Re: [VOTE] shell 1.4.3 release

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Felix Meschberger  wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 06.03.2012 um 07:15 schrieb Karl Pauls:
>
>> I would like to call a vote on the shell 1.4.3 release.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-056/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 056 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix maven-bundle-plugin version 2.3.7

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
 wrote:
>    Stuart:
>
>    you mentioned before that maven-bundle-plugin
>    how has some default bindings for m2e
>    for incremental manifest build in eclipse;
>
>    can you please elaborate a little on
>    how to setup pom to use this feature properly?
>
>    in 2.3.7?
>
>    (my current concert is incremental build speed)
>
>    Thank you,
>
>    Andrei
>
>
>  Original Message  
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Felix maven-bundle-plugin version 2.3.7
> From: Stuart McCulloch 
> To: dev@felix.apache.org
> Date: Sat 11 Feb 2012 01:42:52 PM CST
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We solved 5 issues in this release:
>>
>>   
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.7%22
>>
>> There are still some outstanding issues:
>>
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/component/12311143
>>
>> Staging repository:
>>
>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-221/
>>
>> Maven site docs:
>>
>>   
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.7/doc/site/index.html
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>> signatures:
>>
>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>>
>>   sh check_staged_release.sh 221 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve this release
>> [ ] -1 Veto this release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers, Stuart
>

Re: [VOTE] framework 4.0.2 and related subproject releases

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Angelo van der Sijpt
 wrote:
> +1
>
> Looks good to me, actually fixes a bug we ran into hours after this vote
> going up. Kudos for the negative response time!
>
> Angelo
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> Am 20.11.2011 um 22:08 schrieb Karl Pauls:
>>
>> > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>> >
>> > framework  4.0.2
>> > framework.security 2.0.1
>> > main 4.0.2
>> > main.distribution 4.0.2
>> >
>> >
>> > Staging repositories:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-225/
>> >
>> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>> >
>> > Usage:
>> > sh check_staged_release.sh 225 /tmp/felix-staging
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] framework 4.0.1 and related subprojects

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)

Tested with Apache Maven 2.2.1, java version "1.6.0_26 Java
HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM", on Mac OSX
Tested with Apache Maven 2.2.1, java version "1.7.0 IBM J9 VM", on Ubuntu 10.04

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Richard S. Hall  wrote:
> +1
>
> -> richard
>
> On 10/10/11 4:33 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>>
>> framework  4.0.1
>> main 4.0.1
>> main.distribution 4.0.1
>>
>>
>> Staging repositories:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-052/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 052 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>

Re: svn commit: r964793 - /karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java

[Jamie G.]

Sorry, wrong email list (auto email address complete :S).

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Jamie G.  wrote:
> The unit tests under org.apache.karaf.features.FeaturesServiceTest
> need to be updated after the changes introduced in this commit. I
> think the mock signatures need tweaking.
>
>> Author: cmoulliard
>> Date: Fri Jul 16 13:16:51 2010
>> New Revision: 964793
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964793&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Adapt the code to allow to stop or start a bundle when this one is deployed 
>> through feature
>> mechanism --> 
>>
>> Modified:
>>     
>> karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java
>>
>> Modified: 
>> karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java?rev=964793&r1=964792&r2=964793&view=diff
>

Re: svn commit: r964793 - /karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java

[Jamie G.]

The unit tests under org.apache.karaf.features.FeaturesServiceTest
need to be updated after the changes introduced in this commit. I
think the mock signatures need tweaking.

> Author: cmoulliard
> Date: Fri Jul 16 13:16:51 2010
> New Revision: 964793
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964793&view=rev
> Log:
> Adapt the code to allow to stop or start a bundle when this one is deployed 
> through feature
> mechanism --> 
>
> Modified:
> 
> karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java
>
> Modified: 
> karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/internal/FeaturesServiceImpl.java?rev=964793&r1=964792&r2=964793&view=diff

Re: Karaf infrastructure (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Karaf is moving to top level)

[Jamie G.]

Subscription done as well :)

Jamie

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Charles Moulliard
 wrote:
> +1 for me.
>
>
> Charles Moulliard
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
> wrote:
>> Subscription done. Ready to work.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 06/25/2010 02:31 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>> I think mostly everything has been set up thx to infra (see
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2800).
>>> Mailing lists are available at:
>>>   https://cwiki.apache.org/KARAF/mailing-lists.html
>>> Plus the private one which isn't listed there.
>>>
>>> So I welcome everyone to subscribe to those lists so that we can start
>>> working there ...
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 19:48, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:

 The Apache Software Foundation has approved yesterday the move of
 Karaf as a top level project.
 The whole community is thrilled and will strive to make the project
 even better and more successful.

 It will take some time to move all the infrastructure, so we'll keep
 everyone posted.

 --
 Cheers,
 Guillaume Nodet
 
 Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
 
 Open Source SOA
 http://fusesource.com

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.6.2 (5th try)

[Jamie G.]

+1

Jamie

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Freeman Fang  wrote:
> +1
>
> Freeman
> On 2010-6-20, at 上午5:41, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>> I would like to call a new vote on karaf 1.6.2.
>> The only change since the 3th attempt is the fix for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2419 that showed up during
>> the release vote at that time.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-005/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 005 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 There's a problem (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> 
>> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> --
> Freeman Fang
> 
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.6.2 (4th try)

[Jamie G.]

+1

Jamie

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
> I would like to call a new vote on karaf 1.6.2.
> The only change since the 3thd attempt is the fix for the bug Gert
> found in the features service.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-004/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 004 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 There's a problem (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> 
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release webconsole 3.1.0 bundlerepository 1.6.4, karaf 1.6.2 (3rd try)

[Jamie G.]

+1

Jamie

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Carsten Ziegeler  wrote:
> +1
>
> Carsten
>
> Guillaume Nodet  wrote
>> I would like to call a new vote on the following subproject releases:
>>
>> webconsole 3.1.0
>> bundlerepository 1.6.4
>> karaf 1.6.2
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-054/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 054 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 There's a problem (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziege...@apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Propose Karaf as a TLP

[Jamie G.]

+1

Jamie

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Gert Vanthienen
 wrote:
> +1
>
> On 3 June 2010 14:28, David Jencks  wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> I think it's time start a vote about moving Karaf as a TLP as we
>>> recently discussed.
>>> The vote is about submitting the following proposal to the next board 
>>> meeting:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 send this proposal to the board
>>> [ ] -1 do not
>>>
>>> The vote will be opened for 72 hours
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>>> open-source software related to an OSGI based runtime for
>>> creating enterprise servers for distribution at no charge
>>> to the public.
>>>
>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Karaf Project",
>>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>>> Foundation; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby is
>>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>>> related to an OSGI based runtime for creating enterprise
>>> servers; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Karaf" be
>>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>>> of the Apache Karaf Project, and to have primary responsibility
>>> for management of the projects within the scope of
>>> responsibility of the Apache Karaf Project; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>>> Apache Karaf Project:
>>>
>>> * Chris Custine 
>>> * Freeman Fang 
>>> * Jarek Gawor 
>>> * Jamie Goodyear 
>>> * David Jencks 
>>> * Alex Karasulu 
>>> * Charles Moulliard 
>>> * Guillaume Nodet 
>>> * Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>>> * Gert Vanthienen 
>>>
>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Guillaume Nodet
>>>
>>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Karaf, to
>>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Karaf PMC be and hereby is
>>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>>> encourage open development and increased participation in the
>>> Apache Karaf Project; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby
>>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>>> Felix Karaf sub-project; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>>> Felix Karaf sub-project encumbered upon the
>>> Apache Felix Project are hereafter discharged.
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> 
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> 
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

[Jamie G.]

+1

Jamie

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Chris Custine  wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Chris Custine
> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 03:02, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>
>> Here is nearly full proposal.  The chair name is missing.  I volunteer
>> to take it at the begining if no one else want to step up.
>>
>> =
>>
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>> open-source software related to an OSGI based runtime for
>> creating enterprise servers for distribution at no charge
>> to the public.
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Karaf Project",
>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>> Foundation; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby is
>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>> related to an OSGI based runtime for creating enterprise
>> servers; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Karaf" be
>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>> of the Apache Karaf Project, and to have primary responsibility
>> for management of the projects within the scope of
>> responsibility of the Apache Karaf Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> Apache Karaf Project:
>>
>>   * Chris Custine 
>>  * Freeman Fang 
>>  * Jarek Gawor 
>>  * Jamie Goodyear 
>>  * David Jencks 
>>   * Alex Karasulu 
>>   * Charles Moulliard 
>>   * Guillaume Nodet 
>>  * Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>>  * Gert Vanthienen 
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that X
>>
>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Karaf, to
>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Karaf PMC be and hereby is
>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>> encourage open development and increased participation in the
>> Apache Karaf Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby
>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>> Felix Karaf sub-project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>> Felix Karaf sub-project encumbered upon the
>> Apache Felix Project are hereafter discharged.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:20, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>> > Karaf has been brought into the Felix TLP nearly one year ago.
>> > Things have not been too bad, but I still see the karaf community as
>> > being very disjoint from the other felix community, as it looks that none
>> > of the existing felix committers did really get involved in Karaf.  I
>> > really
>> > don't blame anyone, i think it's just that the interest are not the same
>> > (not sure
>> > where they actually diverge though).
>> > I don't really see what benefit Karaf would have in continuing being part
>> of
>> > Felix, so
>> > I'd like to open the discussion about moving it to a TLP.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > 
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> > 
>> > Open Source SOA
>> > http://fusesource.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> 
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

[Jamie G.]

A more concise description of the project's scope is fine by me.
Depending on the particular project the term 'build' or 'assemble'
sounds apt for how one uses Karaf, so I'm comfortable with either
wording.

Jamie

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Chris Custine  wrote:
> I like both David and Guillaume's shorter versions.  I could accept either
> one.
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris Custine
> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 31, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> > This should be a one sentence description of the project.  The only
>> > purpose is to roughly define the scope.  We don't want to be too broad
>> > or people won't understand what the project goal is, nor we would want
>> > to be too narrow and restrict the scope too much or be too specific.
>> >  For example, Camel is described as "an open-source integration
>> > framework based on known Enterprise Integration Pattern".
>> >
>> > Other examples are:
>> >  CouchDB: "... implementing a distributed, fault-tolerant and
>> > schema-free document-oriented database"
>> >  Qpid: "... distributed messaging"
>> >  Abdera: "... a framework for building clients and servers for the
>> > Atom Publishing Protocol and other related technology"
>> >
>> > I even think we could trim the description a bit.  The fact that we
>> > want to provide tooling is simply for easing the use of karaf, so
>> > maybe something a bit shorter like:
>> >  "an OSGI-based runtime for building enterprise server applications"
>> >
>> > That could be enough.  We might want to add a bit more details, but
>> > not too much imo.
>>
>> I think shorter is better.  I wonder if this would be better:
>>
>> "an OSGI based runtime for assembling enterprise servers"
>>
>> "building" usually implies compilation to me and I don't expect most users
>> of karaf to have to do compilation to use it (rather than some other osgi
>> framework)
>> ServiceMix and Geronimo which I think of as servers are built on karaf.
>> "Server applications" sort of implies to me that you need an additional
>> server to run them on.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 17:26, Charles Moulliard 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Based on Gert text, here is what I propose :
>> >>
>> >>  "... for the creation and maintenance of a small, extensible and
>> >> enterprise-ready OSGi-based server runtime, capable of being a base
>> >> framework for building other enterprise server applications, as well
>> >> as the necessary tools, add-ons and components to facilitate building
>> >> these applications"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -->
>> >>
>> >> "... for the creation and maintenance of an extensible and OSGI-based
>> >> server runtime, capable of being a base framework for building
>> >> enterprise server applications, as well as the necessary tools
>> >> (command line, (secure) shell, provisioning and logging)  and
>> >> components to facilitate building, (perhaps we can also add deployment
>> >> and management) of these applications.
>> >>
>> >> Remark :
>> >>  - if we use "small" as qualifier for the runtime, we should define
>> >> what are the boundaries of the server.
>> >> Question :
>> >> - applications word should be clarified with examples as well as
>> >> enterprise server applications to give a better idea of the scope
>> >> (Will the server be a Web/EJB container, ...) ?
>> >> - Do we have to mention that Karaf project will be developed in close
>> >> cooperation with Apache Aries as a lot of features (Transaction, JPA,
>> >> ...) of Aries will be part of the "enterprise server application" ?
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >>
>> >> Charles Moulliard
>> >>
>> >> Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA)
>> >> Apache Camel/ServiceMix Committer
>> >>
>> >> ***
>> >> - Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>> >> - Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
>> >> - Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet 
>> wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:14, Gert Vanthienen <
>> gert.vanthie...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>>  L.S.,
>> 
>>  Adding my (late) +1 for moving Karaf to a TLP
>> 
>>  Not sure if you're still looking for someone to take an initial stab
>>  at the project goal or if that's being discussed on the Felix PMC at
>>  the moment, but here's my proposal anyway:
>>   "... for the creation and maintenance of
>>   a small, extensible and enterprise-ready OSGi-based server runtime,
>>   capable of being a base framework for building other enterprise
>>  server applications,
>>   as well as the necessary tools, add-ons and c

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

[Jamie G.]

This sounds good to me too. It encompasses all the functions that the
Karaf project will be continuing and/or expanding to do as a TLP.

Jamie

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:14, Gert Vanthienen 
> wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>> Adding my (late) +1 for moving Karaf to a TLP
>>
>> Not sure if you're still looking for someone to take an initial stab
>> at the project goal or if that's being discussed on the Felix PMC at
>> the moment, but here's my proposal anyway:
>>  "... for the creation and maintenance of
>>  a small, extensible and enterprise-ready OSGi-based server runtime,
>>  capable of being a base framework for building other enterprise
>> server applications,
>>  as well as the necessary tools, add-ons and components to facilitate
>> building these applications"
>>
>
> Well, it actually looks perfect to me :-)
> Let's see what other people think about it.
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 May 2010 22:53, Lukasz Dywicki  wrote:
>> >
>> > I would like to say 'yes' for TLP (even if my vote doesn't count).
>> >
>> > I try contribute Karaf from time to time and I wish continue doing that,
>> > when it will move to top level too.
>> >
>> > For me it does not make sense to try close all OSGi releated things in
>> Felix
>> > project. At this moment we have Aries which is also very closer to OSGi
>> but
>> > it's not a part of Felix.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Lukasz Dywicki
>> >
>> >
>> > Jarek Gawor-2 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I would like to be involved with this TLP as well.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Jarek
>> >>
>> >> On Friday, May 28, 2010, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>> >>> It seems there is a consensus to move Karaf as a TLP, at least amongst
>> >>> people involved in Karaf (the other felix committers haven't really
>> >>> expressed any opinion).
>> >>>
>> >>> I think the next steps would be to draft a proposed resolution to the
>> >>> board,
>> >>> which would include:
>> >>>   * the project goal
>> >>>   * the project PMC (including the chair)
>> >>>
>> >>> In order to create an open community from the start, I'd like to invite
>> >>> anyone with an Apache account willing to contribute to Karaf to raise
>> >>> hands
>> >>> so that we can build this list.  I don't think opening it wider for now
>> >>> would be wise, but I do thing we should have a very low entry bar for
>> >>> committership (but that can be discussed later).
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll try to come up with a proposal for Karaf's project goal asap, but
>> >>> anyone is welcome to give it a try and propose some wording.
>> >>>
>> >>> FWIW, it would like the following, we just need to fill the :
>> >>>
>> >>>        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> >>>        interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> >>>        Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> >>>        Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>> >>>        open-source software related to a machine learning platform
>> >>>        for distribution at no charge to the public.
>> >>>
>> >>>        NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>> >>>        Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Karaf Project",
>> >>>        be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>> >>>        Foundation; and be it further
>> >>>
>> >>>        RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby is
>> >>>        responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>> >>>        related to XXX; and be it further
>> >>>
>> >>>        RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Karaf" be
>> >>>        and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>> >>>        serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>> >>>        of the Apache Karaf Project, and to have primary responsibility
>> >>>        for management of the projects within the scope of
>> >>>        responsibility of the Apache Karaf Project; and be it further
>> >>>
>> >>>        RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> >>>        hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> >>>        Apache Karaf Project:
>> >>>
>> >>>          * xxx >
>> >>>          * ...
>> >>>
>> >>>        NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that X
>> >>>        be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Karaf, to
>> >>>        serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>> >>>        Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>> >>>        death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>> >>>        or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>> >>>
>> >>>        RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Karaf PMC be and hereby is
>> >>>        tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>> >>>        encourage open development and increased participation in the
>> >>>        Apache Mahout Project; and be it further
>> >>>
>> >>>        RESOLV

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

[Jamie G.]

+1 I'm on board :)

Cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Alex Karasulu  wrote:
> Likewise I'd also like to participate and agree that this is the right
> direction for Karaf. Count me in.
>
> Regards,
> Alex Karasulu
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I'd like to be a part of this TLP.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On May 27, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> > It seems there is a consensus to move Karaf as a TLP, at least amongst
>> > people involved in Karaf (the other felix committers haven't really
>> > expressed any opinion).
>> >
>> > I think the next steps would be to draft a proposed resolution to the
>> board,
>> > which would include:
>> >  * the project goal
>> >  * the project PMC (including the chair)
>> >
>> > In order to create an open community from the start, I'd like to invite
>> > anyone with an Apache account willing to contribute to Karaf to raise
>> hands
>> > so that we can build this list.  I don't think opening it wider for now
>> > would be wise, but I do thing we should have a very low entry bar for
>> > committership (but that can be discussed later).
>> >
>> > I'll try to come up with a proposal for Karaf's project goal asap, but
>> > anyone is welcome to give it a try and propose some wording.
>> >
>> > FWIW, it would like the following, we just need to fill the :
>> >
>> >       WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> >       interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> >       Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> >       Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>> >       open-source software related to a machine learning platform
>> >       for distribution at no charge to the public.
>> >
>> >       NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>> >       Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Karaf Project",
>> >       be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>> >       Foundation; and be it further
>> >
>> >       RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby is
>> >       responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>> >       related to XXX; and be it further
>> >
>> >       RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Karaf" be
>> >       and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>> >       serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>> >       of the Apache Karaf Project, and to have primary responsibility
>> >       for management of the projects within the scope of
>> >       responsibility of the Apache Karaf Project; and be it further
>> >
>> >       RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> >       hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> >       Apache Karaf Project:
>> >
>> >         * xxx >
>> >         * ...
>> >
>> >       NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that X
>> >       be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Karaf, to
>> >       serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>> >       Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>> >       death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>> >       or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>> >
>> >       RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Karaf PMC be and hereby is
>> >       tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>> >       encourage open development and increased participation in the
>> >       Apache Mahout Project; and be it further
>> >
>> >       RESOLVED, that the Apache Karaf Project be and hereby
>> >       is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>> >       Felix Karaf sub-project; and be it further
>> >
>> >       RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>> >       Felix Karaf sub-project encumbered upon the
>> >       Apache Felix Project are hereafter discharged.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:20, Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Karaf has been brought into the Felix TLP nearly one year ago.
>> >> Things have not been too bad, but I still see the karaf community as
>> >> being very disjoint from the other felix community, as it looks that
>> none
>> >> of the existing felix committers did really get involved in Karaf.  I
>> >> really
>> >> don't blame anyone, i think it's just that the interest are not the same
>> >> (not sure
>> >> where they actually diverge though).
>> >> I don't really see what benefit Karaf would have in continuing being
>> part
>> >> of Felix, so
>> >> I'd like to open the discussion about moving it to a TLP.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> 
>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> 
>> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > 
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> > ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.6.0 (2nd try)

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
> -Original Message-
> From: Guillaume Nodet 
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 23:21:54
> To: dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.6.0 (2nd try)
>
> Second try.  The karaf manual should be ok now and this release also
> includes FELIX-2280 (Too much code duplication in DefaultJDBCLock,
> OracleJDBCLock and MySQLJDBCLock).  No other changes.
>
> We solved a bunch of issues for 1.6.0
>   
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12314791
>
> Staging repository:
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-003/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
> signatures:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 003 /tmp/felix-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> 
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Karaf 1.6.0

[Jamie G.]

As discussed in the Karaf IRC channel, the Karaf manual appears to be
blank in both html & pdf formats:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-003/org/apache/felix/karaf/manual/1.6.0/manual-1.6.0.html

Should we see content in here or is the manual a place holder artifact
right now?

Cheers,
Jamie

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> +1
>
> All tests performed were working fine for me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> We solved a bunch of issues for 1.6.0
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12314791
>>
>> Staging repository:
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-003/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 003 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> 
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

[Jamie G.]

So far I think the move to the Felix project from Karaf's Servicemix
Kernel roots has been very positive. It has introduced new
contributors and exposed Karaf to new ideas/concerns. That being said
I think that moving Karaf again, this time to a TLP, will help promote
another growth expansion, attracting a wider audience of users &
contributors. I'm sure that karaf will retain a close connection to
the Felix community as it has kept close to Servicemix.

Cheers,
Jamie


On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Chris Custine  wrote:
> I think that Karaf being part of Felix has been constructive for both
> projects, and has certainly exposed Karaf to a wider community (moving out
> of ServiceMix).  I do hope that some Felix committers will want to come
> along as well if Karaf goes TLP, and that the community at large will follow
> the project wherever it may be.
>
> I have always hoped that Karaf could go TLP at some point, and I actually
> think that it will be easier to expand the community and encourage community
> participation with a more focused project.  I think that developers
> interested in Karaf aren't always interested in the building blocks, and the
> scope of all the Felix subprojects can be daunting for those wanting to get
> involved only with Karaf.  I think there are quite a few out there in this
> category based on the feedback I have received.  Expanding and opening up
> the Karaf community would be a big boost to the project, and I think being a
> TLP will help make that possible.
>
> Just my 2 cents  :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> On 5/14/10 6:20, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> Karaf has been brought into the Felix TLP nearly one year ago.
>>> Things have not been too bad, but I still see the karaf community as
>>> being very disjoint from the other felix community, as it looks that none
>>> of the existing felix committers did really get involved in Karaf.  I
>>> really
>>> don't blame anyone, i think it's just that the interest are not the same
>>> (not sure
>>> where they actually diverge though).
>>> I don't really see what benefit Karaf would have in continuing being part
>>> of
>>> Felix, so
>>> I'd like to open the discussion about moving it to a TLP.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'd say the biggest benefits are the additional oversight and a bigger
>> community getting to listen and respond to any OSGi-related issues that were
>> encountered.
>>
>
> I hope that
>
>
>>
>> Ultimately, perhaps, the Felix community is more geared toward creating
>> general building blocks rather than trying to create an overarching effort
>> to integrate those building blocks for a specific purpose. Creating such
>> OSGi-related building blocks was the goal of the original project proposal
>> and is a reason why I try to push for getting general OSGi-related building
>> blocks into Felix.
>>
>> Overall, I think things have gone well, but if the people directly involved
>> with Karaf want to take it TLP, then I support that decision. We'll still
>> continue to collaborate through the building blocks.
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release fileinstall 3.0.0 (2nd try)

[Jamie G.]

+1 (non-binding)
Jamie

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Freeman Fang  wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Freeman
> On 2010-5-1, at 下午3:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
>>
>> fileinstall 3.0.0
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-039/
>>
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> signatures:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>
>> Usage:
>> sh check_staged_release.sh 039 /tmp/felix-staging
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> 
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
> --
> Freeman Fang
> 
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>
>