[DISCUSS] Removing documentation on Azure Pipelines for Flink forks
Hi everyone, I'm wondering whether anyone has objections against removing the Azure Pipelines Tutorial to "set up CI for a fork of the Flink repository" in the Flink wiki. Flink's GitHub Actions workflow seems to work fine for forks (at least for 1.18+ changes). No need to guide contributors to the flink-mirror repository to create draft PRs. And it's not used that often, anyway [2]. Best, Matthias [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Azure+Pipelines#AzurePipelines-Tutorial:SettingupAzurePipelinesforaforkoftheFlinkrepository [2] https://github.com/flink-ci/flink-mirror/pulls?q=is%3Apr
Re: [DISCUSS] Removing documentation on Azure Pipelines for Flink forks
Hi Matthias, thanks for driving this agree GHA seems working ok however to be on the safe side what if we mark it for removal or deprecated first and then remove together with dropping support of 1.17 where GHA is not supported IIUC? On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:42 AM Matthias Pohl wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm wondering whether anyone has objections against removing the Azure > Pipelines Tutorial to "set up CI for a fork of the Flink repository" in the > Flink wiki. Flink's GitHub Actions workflow seems to work fine for forks > (at least for 1.18+ changes). No need to guide contributors to the > flink-mirror repository to create draft PRs. And it's not used that often, > anyway [2]. > > Best, > Matthias > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Azure+Pipelines#AzurePipelines-Tutorial:SettingupAzurePipelinesforaforkoftheFlinkrepository > [2] https://github.com/flink-ci/flink-mirror/pulls?q=is%3Apr > -- Best regards, Sergey
Re: [DISCUSS] Removing documentation on Azure Pipelines for Flink forks
Good pointing. I guess, marking it as deprecated and pointing to GitHub Actions as the new workaround would be a better way than removing it entirely for now. On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:47 AM Sergey Nuyanzin wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > thanks for driving this > agree GHA seems working ok > > however to be on the safe side what if we mark it for removal or deprecated > first > and then remove together with dropping support of 1.17 where GHA is not > supported IIUC? > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:42 AM Matthias Pohl > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm wondering whether anyone has objections against removing the Azure > > Pipelines Tutorial to "set up CI for a fork of the Flink repository" in > the > > Flink wiki. Flink's GitHub Actions workflow seems to work fine for forks > > (at least for 1.18+ changes). No need to guide contributors to the > > flink-mirror repository to create draft PRs. And it's not used that > often, > > anyway [2]. > > > > Best, > > Matthias > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Azure+Pipelines#AzurePipelines-Tutorial:SettingupAzurePipelinesforaforkoftheFlinkrepository > > [2] https://github.com/flink-ci/flink-mirror/pulls?q=is%3Apr > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey >
