Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. For the 0.7 release it has been decided because it is too much work to change it before the 0.7. The wider update is scheduled for 0.8. Images stay put for now. xdocs remains as is for now. raw content (other than images) goes alongside xdocs All that needs doing is the docs get updated for the 0.7 release. Ross
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ross Gardler wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. For the 0.7 release it has been decided because it is too much work to change it before the 0.7. The wider update is scheduled for 0.8. Images stay put for now. xdocs remains as is for now. If this needs to be done. The sooner, the better. raw content (other than images) goes alongside xdocs All that needs doing is the docs get updated for the 0.7 release. Ross
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. For the 0.7 release it has been decided because it is too much work to change it before the 0.7. The wider update is scheduled for 0.8. Images stay put for now. xdocs remains as is for now. If this needs to be done. The sooner, the better. This is only one part of a more wide ranging change. It requires a big clean up of docs, which will take some time. These cahnges are scheduled for 0.8 and have been (http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-187 ). 0.7 is already well overdue and it is important we get it out. I am -1 on delaying it any further. Ross
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 00:55 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: RG Perhaps you could start with RG http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-470 RG as this is a blocker for the 0.7 release will try and look at that tomorrow: right now I understand only half of what I'm reading there. Me neither. ;-) I guess Ross meant mainly http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-362 -- Ferdinand Soethe salu2 -- thorsten Together we stand, divided we fall! Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Thorsten Scherler wrote: Me neither. ;-) I guess Ross meant mainly http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-362 No I don't think so, but this a good issue for the thread about renaming things. Sorry for not having read the issues first. I'll reply to this in the renaming thread. -- Ferdinand Soethe
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 00:55 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: RG Perhaps you could start with RG http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-470 RG as this is a blocker for the 0.7 release will try and look at that tomorrow: right now I understand only half of what I'm reading there. The way we handle raw content has changed (it no longer has its own directory it is kept alongside the to be processed content). As a consequence the documentation is incorrect. Someone needs to go through the docs and correct it. We also need some samples adding to fresh-site (or the proposed demo site). Me neither. ;-) I guess Ross meant mainly http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-362 I did *not* mean that one. That should *not* happen before 0.7 is released. Too much work, it'll delay 0.7 for another month. Ross
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ross Gardler wrote: The way we handle raw content has changed (it no longer has its own directory it is kept alongside the to be processed content). As a consequence the documentation is incorrect. Someone needs to go through the docs and correct it. We also need some samples adding to fresh-site (or the proposed demo site). Thanks for making that clearer. Will try to take care of that soon. But while we are at it and since I just suggested to go back to having raw content in the same dir, can you tell what the reason behind the separation was? Thanks, -- Ferdinand Soethe
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: The way we handle raw content has changed (it no longer has its own directory it is kept alongside the to be processed content). As a consequence the documentation is incorrect. Someone needs to go through the docs and correct it. We also need some samples adding to fresh-site (or the proposed demo site). Thanks for making that clearer. Will try to take care of that soon. But while we are at it and since I just suggested to go back to having raw content in the same dir, can you tell what the reason behind the separation was? Thanks, -- Ferdinand Soethe it was to allow raw content be processed without transformation (java files and such) Cheers, cheche
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ross Gardler wrote: Prior to this change raw content was kept in a separate directory. This meant users had to manage two directory structures, which, more of ten than not, were the same. Now we just place the *raw* files in the xdocs directory. (which means the xdocs name is now misleading hence the proposal to remove it after 0.7). That is why I think that we should remove xdocs content. WDYT?
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Sorry. Now I'm totally confused as to where raw content (= content that will be passed on without processing) should be from 0.7 on. If it is to be kept alongside the to be processed content as Ross wrote, we already have what I asked for and we only need to move xdocs in content. But then I don't understand the ongoing discussion about putting images in resources. Are they not also unprocessed content? Ferdinand
Re: Clean up freshsite to be just that
Ross Gardler wrote: RG Perhaps you could start with RG http://issues.cocoondev.org/browse/FOR-470 RG as this is a blocker for the 0.7 release will try and look at that tomorrow: right now I understand only half of what I'm reading there. -- Ferdinand Soethe
