[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 745761
Geronimo Revision: 745761 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090219/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090219/unit-test-reports
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.geronimo.axis2.Axis2WebServiceContainerTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.239 sec
Results :
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/modules/geronimo-axis2/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, AXIS2 :: AXIS2
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache.snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
codehaus-snapshots
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.pom
3K downloaded
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.mar
24K downloaded
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: process}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[INFO] Generated:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/target/resources/META-INF/plan.xml
[INFO] [car:verify-no-dependency-change]
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.alwaysonprofileactiva...@576a576a
[WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager. Ignored.
component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.fileprofileactiva...@576a576a
[INFO] ---
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4543) EAR classloader not garbage collected
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Janko Heilgeist updated GERONIMO-4543: -- Attachment: privileged_currenttime.patch This patch starts the CurrentTime thread in a privileged block to prevent it from inheriting the AccessControlContext of the current thread. > EAR classloader not garbage collected > - > > Key: GERONIMO-4543 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4543 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: transaction manager >Affects Versions: 2.2 >Reporter: Janko Heilgeist > Attachments: ear-with-tx.tar.gz, privileged_currenttime.patch > > > The TransactionTimer$CurrentTime thread inherits the AccessControlContext of > the first EAR/WAR/EJB-jar that carries out a transaction. Thus, the > particular EAR/WAR/EJB-jar's classloader is prevented from being GCed. > See http://www.nabble.com/PermGen-space-issues-td22079768s134.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4543) EAR classloader not garbage collected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Janko Heilgeist updated GERONIMO-4543:
--
Attachment: ear-with-tx.tar.gz
This EAR packages an EJB-jar and a WAR. The EJB exports an empty transactional
method which the WAR's servlet accesses during deployment. After
deploying/undeploying the EAR there are still live connections to the rootset:
{code}
Java Local Reference (from
org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.transactiontimer$currentt...@0x2aaab30aaed8)
exclude :
-->
org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.transactiontimer$currentt...@0x2aaab30aaed8
(164 bytes) (field inheritedAccessControlContext:) exclude
--> java.security.accesscontrolcont...@0x2aaab30aafb0 (41 bytes) (field
context:) exclude
--> [Ljava.security.ProtectionDomain;@0x2aaab30aba00 (136 bytes) (Element 14 of
[Ljava.security.ProtectionDomain;@0x2aaab30aba00:) exclude
--> java.security.protectiondom...@0x2aaab30aba90 (50 bytes) (field
classloader:) exclude
--> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.multiparentclassloa...@0x2aaab2a376b8
(156 bytes) (field parents:) exclude
--> [Ljava.lang.ClassLoader;@0x2aaab3086ff0 (88 bytes) (Element 1 of
[Ljava.lang.ClassLoader;@0x2aaab3086ff0:) exclude
-->
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.childrenconfigurationclassloa...@0x2aaab03bb338
(115 bytes) (field parent:) exclude
--> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.multiparentclassloa...@0x2aaab2a37608
(156 bytes) exclude
{code}
> EAR classloader not garbage collected
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4543
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4543
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: transaction manager
>Affects Versions: 2.2
>Reporter: Janko Heilgeist
> Attachments: ear-with-tx.tar.gz
>
>
> The TransactionTimer$CurrentTime thread inherits the AccessControlContext of
> the first EAR/WAR/EJB-jar that carries out a transaction. Thus, the
> particular EAR/WAR/EJB-jar's classloader is prevented from being GCed.
> See http://www.nabble.com/PermGen-space-issues-td22079768s134.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4543) EAR classloader not garbage collected
EAR classloader not garbage collected - Key: GERONIMO-4543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4543 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: transaction manager Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: Janko Heilgeist The TransactionTimer$CurrentTime thread inherits the AccessControlContext of the first EAR/WAR/EJB-jar that carries out a transaction. Thus, the particular EAR/WAR/EJB-jar's classloader is prevented from being GCed. See http://www.nabble.com/PermGen-space-issues-td22079768s134.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4542) Significant lock contention exists in HttpServletResponse.addCookie()
Significant lock contention exists in HttpServletResponse.addCookie() -- Key: GERONIMO-4542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4542 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: Tomcat Affects Versions: 2.1.3, 2.1.2, 2.1.1, 2.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.1, 2.0, 2.0.3, 2.1.4, 2.2 Environment: All Reporter: Manu T George org.apache.catalina.connector.Response calls ServerCookie.appendCookieValue which in turn calls DateTool.formatOldCookie in tomcat6 which contains synchronisation which results in significant contention. The fix will be to use a ThreadLocal variable instead. The code change can be found in tomcat trunk http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?view=markup&pathrev=744564 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=744238 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Download statistics
Some thoughts: Users add http://apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/updates/ to their Eclipse update manager. Every time the user start Eclipse update manager to search updates, the update manager needs to download the features to compare the remote feature version with installed version to see if there's updates. I guess that's why features path have more downloads of jar files than other path. On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote: > Poking through the apache.org logs, I see a large number of downloads of jar > files from this directory: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/updates/features/ > > Given the large number of downloads, I suspect these are being driven by > automation. Are these downloads being driven by G builds? > > Bill > -- Shawn
[BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 745696
Geronimo Revision: 745696 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 34 minutes 3 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Feb 18 20:39:13 EST 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 258M/558M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218/logs-2000-tomcat/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.284 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running jpa-testsuite.jpa [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.294 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.615 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running web-testsuite.references [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.281 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.205 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.203 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.206 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.439 sec <<< FAILURE! Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218/logs-2000-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.331 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running jpa-testsuite.jpa [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.319 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.657 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running web-testsuite.references [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.346 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.203 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.217 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.206 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.457 sec <<< FAILURE!
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 745701
Geronimo Revision: 745701 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090218/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090218/unit-test-reports
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 20 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 6 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 7 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/test-classes
[INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.geronimo.axis2.Axis2WebServiceContainerTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.453 sec
Results :
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/modules/geronimo-axis2/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, AXIS2 :: AXIS2
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache.snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
codehaus-snapshots
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.pom
3K downloaded
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.mar
24K downloaded
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: process}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/target/resources/META-INF/plan.xml
[INFO] [car:verify-no-dependency-change]
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Dependencies have changed:
Added dependencies are saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.added.xml
Tree listing is saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/treeListing.xml
Delete
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.xml
if you are happy with the dependency changes.
[INFO]
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: Dependencies have changed:
Added dependencies are saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.added.xml
Tree listing is saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/treeListing.xml
Delete
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.xml
if you are happy with the dependency changes.
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:579)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:499)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:478)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(Def
Download statistics
Poking through the apache.org logs, I see a large number of downloads of jar files from this directory: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/updates/features/ Given the large number of downloads, I suspect these are being driven by automation. Are these downloads being driven by G builds? Bill
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4541) Upgrade to ASM 3.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4541: --- Attachment: G4541.patch Patch to upgrade all XBean usage to 3.5 and to upgrade ASM from 2.2.3 to 3.1, as required by the latest OpenEJB 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT source code. > Upgrade to ASM 3.1 > -- > > Key: GERONIMO-4541 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4541 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: dependencies, OpenEJB >Affects Versions: 2.1.4 >Reporter: Donald Woods >Assignee: Donald Woods > Fix For: 2.1.4 > > Attachments: G4541.patch > > > Latest OpenEJB 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT as of r745463 on 2/18 requires ASM 3.1 instead > of 2.2.3, due to an API change in the ClassReader.accept() method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4541) Upgrade to ASM 3.1
Upgrade to ASM 3.1 -- Key: GERONIMO-4541 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4541 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: dependencies, OpenEJB Affects Versions: 2.1.4 Reporter: Donald Woods Assignee: Donald Woods Fix For: 2.1.4 Latest OpenEJB 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT as of r745463 on 2/18 requires ASM 3.1 instead of 2.2.3, due to an API change in the ClassReader.accept() method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 745587
Geronimo Revision: 745587 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 36 minutes 39 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Feb 18 14:41:51 EST 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 315M/940M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/logs-1400-tomcat/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.408 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.209 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.222 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.431 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 9.847 sec <<< FAILURE! Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/logs-1400-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.454 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.212 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.212 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.212 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.437 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 10.068 sec <<< FAILURE! Samples: branches/2.1 = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/samples-1400.log Build status: OK
Re: [VOTE] Use apache's nexus for release and snapshot staging and deployment
Agree. -1 to delaying the 2.1.4 server release for these changes. Also seems that we would need to update Genesis first (maybe the 2.0 code in trunk), which would setup the new nexus config for the other projects... -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: - How would this affect our upcoming releases of javamail spec, javamail provider, txmanager, and the Geronimo 2.1.4 server? Some of these utilize the maven release process and other do not. - What are the potential gotchas when making this conversion? - How would this affect our plugin installation given that they reference people.apache and such? I suspect there might be some work necessary here. - How about custom server assemblies - any potential impacts related to plugins again? I've also seen comments that indicate that there might be issues with artifacts from private repositories (such as we have for our private builds of pluto, tomcat, etc...) and external repositories (like our java.net dependencies) that require special handling. Are there potential problems lurking there? It could be there is really nothing here to worry about but I really don't know enough about the changes necessary for Nexus to say one way or the other and I tend to get risk adverse as we get closer to a release. Perhaps we should wait until after we release Geronimo 2.1.4 to make this change. I have to vote -1 until these questions can be answered and there is some degree of certainty that this won't hinder the 2.1.4 release or the plugin install & custom assembly user experience. Joe David Jencks wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Would this be just for trunk or would it also include the upcoming 2.1.4 release? What about devtools, specs, components, daytrader and gshell? I think it would be for everything we release to a maven repo including xbean, gshell, components, specs, daytrader, plugins, server, and everything else I forgot about. I guess devtools might be different I'm not sure if that is released to a maven repo or to somewhere else??... but if to a maven repo then it should use nexus. david jencks -Donald David Jencks wrote: Last week I noted that there's an apache nexus installation that we can use for staging and deployment... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896 They suggest a vote on this, so here goes. Lets ask sonatype/infra to move geronimo to using nexus for deployment. +1 about time already +0 needs more thought -1... I prefer doing things the hard way :-D Vote open for 72 hours. thanks david jencks
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 745612
Geronimo Revision: 745612 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090218/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090218/unit-test-reports
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 20 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 6 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 7 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/test-classes
[INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.geronimo.axis2.Axis2WebServiceContainerTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.669 sec
Results :
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/modules/geronimo-axis2/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, AXIS2 :: AXIS2
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache.snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
codehaus-snapshots
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.pom
3K downloaded
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.mar
24K downloaded
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: process}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/target/resources/META-INF/plan.xml
[INFO] [car:verify-no-dependency-change]
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Dependencies have changed:
Added dependencies are saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.added.xml
Tree listing is saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/treeListing.xml
Delete
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.xml
if you are happy with the dependency changes.
[INFO]
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: Dependencies have changed:
Added dependencies are saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.added.xml
Tree listing is saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/treeListing.xml
Delete
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.xml
if you are happy with the dependency changes.
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:579)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:499)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:478)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(Def
Re: [VOTE] Use apache's nexus for release and snapshot staging and deployment
- How would this affect our upcoming releases of javamail spec, javamail provider, txmanager, and the Geronimo 2.1.4 server? Some of these utilize the maven release process and other do not. - What are the potential gotchas when making this conversion? - How would this affect our plugin installation given that they reference people.apache and such? I suspect there might be some work necessary here. - How about custom server assemblies - any potential impacts related to plugins again? I've also seen comments that indicate that there might be issues with artifacts from private repositories (such as we have for our private builds of pluto, tomcat, etc...) and external repositories (like our java.net dependencies) that require special handling. Are there potential problems lurking there? It could be there is really nothing here to worry about but I really don't know enough about the changes necessary for Nexus to say one way or the other and I tend to get risk adverse as we get closer to a release. Perhaps we should wait until after we release Geronimo 2.1.4 to make this change. I have to vote -1 until these questions can be answered and there is some degree of certainty that this won't hinder the 2.1.4 release or the plugin install & custom assembly user experience. Joe David Jencks wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Would this be just for trunk or would it also include the upcoming 2.1.4 release? What about devtools, specs, components, daytrader and gshell? I think it would be for everything we release to a maven repo including xbean, gshell, components, specs, daytrader, plugins, server, and everything else I forgot about. I guess devtools might be different I'm not sure if that is released to a maven repo or to somewhere else??... but if to a maven repo then it should use nexus. david jencks -Donald David Jencks wrote: Last week I noted that there's an apache nexus installation that we can use for staging and deployment... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896 They suggest a vote on this, so here goes. Lets ask sonatype/infra to move geronimo to using nexus for deployment. +1 about time already +0 needs more thought -1... I prefer doing things the hard way :-D Vote open for 72 hours. thanks david jencks
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0.3 release
On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Feb 16, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: Hello all, I did some work on trying to get a 2.0.3 release that would: a) build - sucess! b) pass the TCK - Massive failure (over 5000 tests) So, considering that we have a 2.1.x and 2.2.x codestream in progress with JEE6 breathing down our necks - I have been officially pushed into the 'we should probably just document what it takes to upgrade' group. Are there any folks who truly need to stay on 2.0? Or would it be reasonable to make a pronouncement that the 2.0.x codestream is no longer going to be maintained - even for bug fixes and security issues? Thoughts/comments? (I'll start documenting the libraries/jars that have changed or been removed - we will need that regardless) There should be discussion of this on our user list. Could you start a discussion there? I'm ok with this. Confess that I'm a bit curious about why we'd have tck failures. I don't have a big issue with it, but in general we don't discuss tck specifics (including numbers of tests, etc) on a public list. Jay, FYI, I checked back on our automated test results. February 4th is when we started seeing test failures on branches/2.0. So the following commits are the likely causes of the problems: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=740608 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=740985 --kevan
Re: [BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 745486 - Changes in OpenEJB
I'm seeing EJB deployment failures due to OpenEJB 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT upgrading to ASM 3.1. r745463 | dblevins | 2009-02-18 05:10:40 -0500 (Wed, 18 Feb 2009) | 2 lines ASM 2.2.3 to ASM 3.1 upgrade 2009-02-18 13:10:49,970 ERROR [Deployer] Deployment failed due to java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept(Lorg/objectweb/asm/ClassVisitor;I)V at org.apache.openejb.core.TempClassLoader.isAnnotationClass(TempClassLoader.java:132) at org.apache.openejb.core.TempClassLoader.loadClass(TempClassLoader.java:92) at org.apache.openejb.core.TempClassLoader.loadClass(TempClassLoader.java:50) at org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.CmpJarBuilder.generateClass(CmpJarBuilder.java:117) at org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.CmpJarBuilder.generate(CmpJarBuilder.java:71) at org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.CmpJarBuilder.getJarFile(CmpJarBuilder.java:53) at org.apache.geronimo.openejb.deployment.EjbModuleBuilder.getEjbJarInfo(EjbModuleBuilder.java:604) at org.apache.geronimo.openejb.deployment.EjbModuleBuilder.initContext(EjbModuleBuilder.java:500) at org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder.buildConfiguration(EARConfigBuilder.java:595) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:255) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:134) ... -Donald ga...@apache.org wrote: Geronimo Revision: 745486 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 33 minutes 59 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Feb 18 08:40:50 EST 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 314M/932M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/logs-0800-tomcat/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.398 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.211 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.434 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.525 sec <<< FAILURE! Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/logs-0800-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.426 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.211 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.215 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.441 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 9.339 sec <<< FAILURE! Samples: branches/2.1 = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/samples-0800.log Build status: OK
Re: [VOTE] Release gshell 1.0-alpha2
The vote passes with 6 +1s and no other votes. I will publish the binaries to central repo asap. On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:44, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've uploaded a release of gshell 1.0-alpha2. > > The staging repo is available at: > http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/gshell-1.0-alpha2 > The svn tag is: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/gshell/tags/gshell-1.0-alpha-2/ > > Please review and vote ! > > [ ] +1 Release gshell-1.0-alpha2 > [ ] -1 Do not > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4540) Improve windows startup batch scripts to redirect stdout and stderr messages to GERONIMO_HOME/var/log/geronimo.out
Improve windows startup batch scripts to redirect stdout and stderr messages to GERONIMO_HOME/var/log/geronimo.out -- Key: GERONIMO-4540 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4540 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: commands Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2 Environment: Any windows platform Reporter: Forrest Xia Now the windows startup batch scripts print the stdout and stderr in a Command Prompt window, sometimes it is not user-friendly to check error or stdout message for analysis purpose. Do we need to improve it, so that the stdout and stderr are redirected to a file, as did on linux platform? Please comment. thanks! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release gshell 1.0-alpha2
On Feb 18, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: None of those files are included in a release. They're part of the source release, whether or not they're in the binary distribution is irrelevant... The binary files (build, extract, etc) are pretty trivial. So, I wouldn't require a re-release for those... They look like somebody's private build tools. I doubt they should really be in svn. Some of them don't look like they'd work (i.e. rebuild is calling 'nukeTargets'). Sure, they could be removed, they are the scripts I run, I got tired of having to recreate them when my laptop drive kept crashing. NOTES.txt looks like a todo list. Prolly should be removed, but I wouldn't hold up a release for that either. Um, why would I want to remove a todo list? What about README.txt should that also be removed? The above files should be cleaned up on trunk... Why? Assume GShell.mdxml is generated by a tool, and therefore wouldn't require a license header. Are you using this as a development aid? This is the MagicDraw UML models for the project. * * * IMO, the source distribution already contains a top-level LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt and that should be good enough to cover any of the files which are in question. --jason
build failure on IBM JDK1.5
[INFO] Started deployer: org.apache.geronimo.framework/geronimo-gbean-deployer/2 .2-SNAPSHOT/car [ERROR] The protocol for the JAR file's URL is not supported java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Only local file jars are supported jar: file:/C:/m2/org/apache/geronimo/configs/system-database/2.2-SNAPSHOT/system-data base-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car!/rar/tranql-connector-1.4.jar org.apache.geronimo.kernel.classloader.UrlResourceFinder.cacheUrl(UrlResourc eFinder.java:231) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/build-failure-on-IBM-JDK1.5-tp22080514s134p22080514.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release gshell 1.0-alpha2
On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: None of those files are included in a release. They're part of the source release, whether or not they're in the binary distribution is irrelevant... The binary files (build, extract, etc) are pretty trivial. So, I wouldn't require a re-release for those... They look like somebody's private build tools. I doubt they should really be in svn. Some of them don't look like they'd work (i.e. rebuild is calling 'nukeTargets'). NOTES.txt looks like a todo list. Prolly should be removed, but I wouldn't hold up a release for that either. The above files should be cleaned up on trunk... Assume GShell.mdxml is generated by a tool, and therefore wouldn't require a license header. Are you using this as a development aid? --kevan
[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 745486
Geronimo Revision: 745486 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 33 minutes 59 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Feb 18 08:40:50 EST 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 314M/932M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/logs-0800-tomcat/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.398 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.211 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.434 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.525 sec <<< FAILURE! Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/logs-0800-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.426 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXRTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.211 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBStaxTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.213 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.EJBJAXBTest [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.215 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.testset.JaxRPCTest [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.441 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 9.339 sec <<< FAILURE! Samples: branches/2.1 = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090218/samples-0800.log Build status: OK
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 745505
Geronimo Revision: 745505 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090218/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090218/unit-test-reports
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 20 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 6 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 7 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/test-classes
[INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.geronimo.axis2.Axis2WebServiceContainerTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.705 sec
Results :
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/geronimo-axis2/target/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/modules/geronimo-axis2/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-axis2-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, AXIS2 :: AXIS2
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache.snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.axis2:addressing:SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from
codehaus-snapshots
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.pom
3K downloaded
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/axis2/addressing/SNAPSHOT/addressing-SNAPSHOT.mar
24K downloaded
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: process}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/target/resources/META-INF/plan.xml
[INFO] [car:verify-no-dependency-change]
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Dependencies have changed:
Added dependencies are saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.added.xml
Tree listing is saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/treeListing.xml
Delete
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.xml
if you are happy with the dependency changes.
[INFO]
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: Dependencies have changed:
Added dependencies are saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.added.xml
Tree listing is saved here:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/treeListing.xml
Delete
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis2/axis2/src/main/history/dependencies.xml
if you are happy with the dependency changes.
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:579)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:499)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:478)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(Def
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3759) Geronimo Tomcat Clustering - No GBeans for adding Static Members
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674612#action_12674612
]
Jason Warner commented on GERONIMO-3759:
Your config.xml is missing the module entry for mconsole-ds. I'm not sure why
this is. There could be a number of reasons. I suggest you start with a fresh
server and copy only the changes necessary from any external config.xml. For
example, start with the default config.xml and copy over only the necessary
clustering config from the attached config_ag21.xml. I'm not sure how you lost
the mconsole-ds module since it seems to be present both in the config_ag21.xml
as well as the default config.xml that my server build starts with. For
clarification, I ran this on Geronimo Tomcat Java EE 5 2.1.3. If you have any
further trouble with this, please post questions to the user list with a
reference to this jira. I don't believe the comment section of a long closed
jira is the best place for discussing bugs that aren't really related to the
changes made in relation to that jira.
> Geronimo Tomcat Clustering - No GBeans for adding Static Members
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3759
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3759
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: Clustering
>Affects Versions: 2.1, 2.1.1
>Reporter: Shiva Kumar H R
>Assignee: Jason Warner
> Fix For: 2.1.3, 2.2
>
> Attachments: ClusteringStaticMembers_GERONIMO-3759.patch, config.xml,
> config_ag21.xml, tomcat_server.xml
>
>
> Tomcat uses multicasting for discovering cluster members. It also supports
> static memberships using the StaticMembershipInterceptor if you want to
> extend your membership to points beyond multicasting, using configuration as
> below:
> className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.StaticMembershipInterceptor">
> port="5678"
> securePort="-1"
> host="tomcat01.mydomain.com"
> domain="staging-cluster"
> uniqueId="{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}"/>
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/cluster-interceptor.html
> However, to add this configuration in Geronimo's config.xml, we don't have
> the required GBeans for element.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4539) Deployment failed if JPA PU jar in web module
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674604#action_12674604 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4539: For this issue, I have a question. While adding a GBean to the Configuration, shall the artifact part of the GBean's abstractName be the same with the artifact id of the Configuration object ? Thanks for any comment ! > Deployment failed if JPA PU jar in web module > - > > Key: GERONIMO-4539 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4539 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: deployment >Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2 >Reporter: Forrest Xia > Attachments: my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT_PUjarinwebclasses_ejbjarinweblib.ear > > > If putting JPA persistence unit jar and JPA entity bean jar in web module > WEB-INF/lib, then to deploy it as part of ear, a deployment exception as > follows: > At least one deployment > problem:org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not resolve > reference at deploy time for query > com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear?J2EEApplication=com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear,PersistenceUnitModule=WEB-INF/lib/my-pu-1.0-SNAPSHOT_inclasses.jar,WebModule=my-war-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war,j2eeType=PersistenceUnit,name=myPU#. > No GBean references found. > org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: At least one deployment > problem:org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not resolve > reference at deploy time for query > com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear?J2EEApplication=com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear,PersistenceUnitModule=WEB-INF/lib/my-pu-1.0-SNAPSHOT_inclasses.jar,WebModule=my-war-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war,j2eeType=PersistenceUnit,name=myPU#. > No GBean references found. > at > org.apache.geronimo.persistence.builder.PersistenceUnitRefBuilder.buildNaming(PersistenceUnitRefBuilder.java:154) > at > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.NamingBuilderCollection.buildNaming(NamingBuilderCollection.java:53) > at > org.apache.geronimo.web25.deployment.AbstractWebModuleBuilder.configureBasicWebModuleAttributes(AbstractWebModuleBuilder.java:842) > at > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.deployment.TomcatModuleBuilder.addGBeans(TomcatModuleBuilder.java:347) > at > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.SwitchingModuleBuilder.addGBeans(SwitchingModuleBuilder.java:165) > at > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder.buildConfiguration(EARConfigBuilder.java:647) > at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:254) > at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:133) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:45) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:599) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.ReflectionMethodInvoker.invoke(ReflectionMethodInvoker.java:34) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:124) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:867) > at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.invoke(BasicKernel.java:239) > at > org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.AbstractDeployCommand.doDeploy(AbstractDeployCommand.java:116) > at > org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.DistributeCommand.run(DistributeCommand.java:61) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:735) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [VOTE] Use apache's nexus for release and snapshot staging and deployment
+1 --jason On Feb 18, 2009, at 2:17 AM, David Jencks wrote: Last week I noted that there's an apache nexus installation that we can use for staging and deployment... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896 They suggest a vote on this, so here goes. Lets ask sonatype/infra to move geronimo to using nexus for deployment. +1 about time already +0 needs more thought -1... I prefer doing things the hard way :-D Vote open for 72 hours. thanks david jencks
Re: Make "framework" build the entire framework server
On Feb 18, 2009, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Sounds worth the time to try it out. Two requests: 1) If this works, we publish the framework assembly instead of the two minimal assemblies to the Download page for 2.2, as this would allow users to build their own custom minimal server assembly (and of course some docs telling users how to create the old minimal assembly from this new framework assembly.) I'm neutral or slightly +0.1 on this idea. I don't actually see how it relates to my proposal but if everyone agrees I'm fine with this idea. Less = more IMO, so I'm +1 2) If time permits, can we move or duplicate relevant testsuite modules into a new testsuite dir under either the framework dir or a new framework-testsuite dir, so that we can verify the basic framework cmdline scripts and installing plugins (like Jetty/Tomcat to make an equivalent minimal assembly)? I like this idea. For a few months now when I work on a plugin set (mconsole, activemq) I've included a custom server aseembly in the plugin group and added at least one integration test. This has really helped speed up feature development. IIUC you are proposing doing the same for framework. Sure, +1 --jason
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3759) Geronimo Tomcat Clustering - No GBeans for adding Static Members
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
viola.lu updated GERONIMO-3759:
---
Attachment: config.xml
pls check the attached config.xml,thanks.
> Geronimo Tomcat Clustering - No GBeans for adding Static Members
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3759
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3759
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: Clustering
>Affects Versions: 2.1, 2.1.1
>Reporter: Shiva Kumar H R
>Assignee: Jason Warner
> Fix For: 2.1.3, 2.2
>
> Attachments: ClusteringStaticMembers_GERONIMO-3759.patch, config.xml,
> config_ag21.xml, tomcat_server.xml
>
>
> Tomcat uses multicasting for discovering cluster members. It also supports
> static memberships using the StaticMembershipInterceptor if you want to
> extend your membership to points beyond multicasting, using configuration as
> below:
> className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.StaticMembershipInterceptor">
> port="5678"
> securePort="-1"
> host="tomcat01.mydomain.com"
> domain="staging-cluster"
> uniqueId="{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}"/>
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/cluster-interceptor.html
> However, to add this configuration in Geronimo's config.xml, we don't have
> the required GBeans for element.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4539) Deployment failed if JPA PU jar in web module
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia updated GERONIMO-4539: -- Attachment: my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT_PUjarinwebclasses_ejbjarinweblib.ear The test ear used to reproduce the problem. > Deployment failed if JPA PU jar in web module > - > > Key: GERONIMO-4539 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4539 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: deployment >Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2 >Reporter: Forrest Xia > Attachments: my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT_PUjarinwebclasses_ejbjarinweblib.ear > > > If putting JPA persistence unit jar and JPA entity bean jar in web module > WEB-INF/lib, then to deploy it as part of ear, a deployment exception as > follows: > At least one deployment > problem:org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not resolve > reference at deploy time for query > com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear?J2EEApplication=com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear,PersistenceUnitModule=WEB-INF/lib/my-pu-1.0-SNAPSHOT_inclasses.jar,WebModule=my-war-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war,j2eeType=PersistenceUnit,name=myPU#. > No GBean references found. > org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: At least one deployment > problem:org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not resolve > reference at deploy time for query > com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear?J2EEApplication=com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear,PersistenceUnitModule=WEB-INF/lib/my-pu-1.0-SNAPSHOT_inclasses.jar,WebModule=my-war-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war,j2eeType=PersistenceUnit,name=myPU#. > No GBean references found. > at > org.apache.geronimo.persistence.builder.PersistenceUnitRefBuilder.buildNaming(PersistenceUnitRefBuilder.java:154) > at > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.NamingBuilderCollection.buildNaming(NamingBuilderCollection.java:53) > at > org.apache.geronimo.web25.deployment.AbstractWebModuleBuilder.configureBasicWebModuleAttributes(AbstractWebModuleBuilder.java:842) > at > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.deployment.TomcatModuleBuilder.addGBeans(TomcatModuleBuilder.java:347) > at > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.SwitchingModuleBuilder.addGBeans(SwitchingModuleBuilder.java:165) > at > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder.buildConfiguration(EARConfigBuilder.java:647) > at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:254) > at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:133) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:45) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:599) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.ReflectionMethodInvoker.invoke(ReflectionMethodInvoker.java:34) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:124) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:867) > at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.invoke(BasicKernel.java:239) > at > org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.AbstractDeployCommand.doDeploy(AbstractDeployCommand.java:116) > at > org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.DistributeCommand.run(DistributeCommand.java:61) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:735) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4539) Deployment failed if JPA PU jar in web module
Deployment failed if JPA PU jar in web module - Key: GERONIMO-4539 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4539 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: deployment Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2 Reporter: Forrest Xia Attachments: my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT_PUjarinwebclasses_ejbjarinweblib.ear If putting JPA persistence unit jar and JPA entity bean jar in web module WEB-INF/lib, then to deploy it as part of ear, a deployment exception as follows: At least one deployment problem:org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not resolve reference at deploy time for query com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear?J2EEApplication=com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear,PersistenceUnitModule=WEB-INF/lib/my-pu-1.0-SNAPSHOT_inclasses.jar,WebModule=my-war-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war,j2eeType=PersistenceUnit,name=myPU#. No GBean references found. org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: At least one deployment problem:org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not resolve reference at deploy time for query com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear?J2EEApplication=com.heilgeist.testcase.geronimo.jarfile/my-ear/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ear,PersistenceUnitModule=WEB-INF/lib/my-pu-1.0-SNAPSHOT_inclasses.jar,WebModule=my-war-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war,j2eeType=PersistenceUnit,name=myPU#. No GBean references found. at org.apache.geronimo.persistence.builder.PersistenceUnitRefBuilder.buildNaming(PersistenceUnitRefBuilder.java:154) at org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.NamingBuilderCollection.buildNaming(NamingBuilderCollection.java:53) at org.apache.geronimo.web25.deployment.AbstractWebModuleBuilder.configureBasicWebModuleAttributes(AbstractWebModuleBuilder.java:842) at org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.deployment.TomcatModuleBuilder.addGBeans(TomcatModuleBuilder.java:347) at org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.SwitchingModuleBuilder.addGBeans(SwitchingModuleBuilder.java:165) at org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder.buildConfiguration(EARConfigBuilder.java:647) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:254) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:133) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:45) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:599) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.ReflectionMethodInvoker.invoke(ReflectionMethodInvoker.java:34) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:124) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:867) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.invoke(BasicKernel.java:239) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.AbstractDeployCommand.doDeploy(AbstractDeployCommand.java:116) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.DistributeCommand.run(DistributeCommand.java:61) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:735) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4538) Make framework self contained to build the framework server
Make framework self contained to build the framework server --- Key: GERONIMO-4538 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4538 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: buildsystem Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: David Jencks Assignee: David Jencks Fix For: 2.2 Make everything needed to build the framework server be in framework. This should make it a lot easier to experiment with the framework server because you have a lot less to build. It should have its own testsuite, although that may be added later. I don't plan to change any groupIds or artifactIds immediately although some should probably be modified slightly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 745391
Geronimo Revision: 745391 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 33 minutes 45 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Feb 18 02:41:15 EST 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 216M/900M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218/logs-0200-tomcat/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.326 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running jpa-testsuite.jpa [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.28 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.628 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running web-testsuite.references [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.312 sec <<< FAILURE! Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090218/logs-0200-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running deployment-testsuite.deployment [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.323 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running jpa-testsuite.jpa [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.317 sec <<< FAILURE! [INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.675 sec <<< FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running web-testsuite.references [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.314 sec <<< FAILURE!
