Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Struberg
I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss 
those separate without having any pressure.
Wdyt?

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon :
> 
> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 
> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>> +1 to have one repo per spec
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org 
>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
>>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do one 
>>> repo per atomic release.
>>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or work 
>>> with infra to bulk migrate it).
>>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>>> 
>>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>>>  | Old Blog 
>>>  | Github 
>>>  | LinkedIn 
>>>  | Book 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre >> > a écrit :
>>> Hi Mark,
>>> 
>>> I guess you mean for the release ? 
>>> 
>>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s 
>>> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>> 
>>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less 
>>> convenient anyway).
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg >> > > a écrit :
>>> > 
>>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, 
>>> > isn't?
>>> > 
>>> > LieGrue,
>>> > strub
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org 
>>> >> :
>>> >> 
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >> 
>>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
>>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> I think we can start with this projects:
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>>> >> 
>>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
>>> >> 
>>> >> regards,
>>> >> 
>>> >> -- 
>>> >> François
>>> >> fpa...@apache.org 
>>> >> 
>>> > 
>>> 



Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon
Ok, understand

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 09:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated
> to specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon
> mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a
> écrit :
>
> You mean having a vote per spec repository?
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 
>
> Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And
>> then discuss those separate without having any pressure.
>> Wdyt?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon
>>> >> >:
>>>
>>> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> François
>>> fpa...@apache.org 
>>> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :

 +1 to have one repo per spec

 regards,

 François
 fpa...@apache.org 
 Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to
> say we do one repo per atomic release.
> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can
> automate it or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved
> to that ;))
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
> 
>
>
> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I guess you mean for the release ?
>
> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a
> single repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>
> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo
> per spec (less convenient anyway).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  > a écrit :
> >
> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec
> as own git repo, isn't?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
> :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of
> our project
> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think we can start with this projects:
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> >>
> >> -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >>
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you
> want to move.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org 
> >>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated to
specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon 
a écrit :

> You mean having a vote per spec repository?
>
> regards,
>
> Françoisfpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>
> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss
> those separate without having any pressure.
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon <
> francois.pa...@openobject.fr>:
>
> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>
> regards,
>
> Françoisfpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>
> +1 to have one repo per spec
>
> regards,
>
> Françoisfpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do
> one repo per atomic release.
> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or
> work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I guess you mean for the release ?
>>
>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s
>> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>
>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less
>> convenient anyway).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
>> >
>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git
>> repo, isn't?
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think we can start with this projects:
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>> >>
>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> François
>> >> fpa...@apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon
You mean having a vote per spec repository?

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then
> discuss those separate without having any pressure.
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon
>> mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>>:
>>
>> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>>>
>>> +1 to have one repo per spec
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> François
>>> fpa...@apache.org
>>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
 Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
 The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say
 we do one repo per atomic release.
 For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it
 or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
 Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:

 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to
 that ;))

 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau  |  Blog
  | Old Blog
  | Github
  | LinkedIn
  | Book
 


 Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre >>> > a écrit :

 Hi Mark,

 I guess you mean for the release ?

 If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single
 repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).

 But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per
 spec (less convenient anyway).

 Regards
 JB

 > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg >>> > a écrit :
 >
 > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as
 own git repo, isn't?
 >
 > LieGrue,
 > strub
 >
 >
 >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
 :
 >>
 >> Hi,
 >>
 >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our
 project
 >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
 >>
 >>
 >> I think we can start with this projects:
 >>
 >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
 
 >>
 >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
 
 >>
 >> -
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
 
 >>
 >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
 
 >>
 >>
 >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
 >>
 >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
 
 >>
 >>
 >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want
 to move.
 >>
 >> regards,
 >>
 >> --
 >> François
 >> fpa...@apache.org 
 >>
 >

>


Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread JB Onofré
It makes sense to me. 

Regards 
JB

> Le 12 mai 2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss 
> those separate without having any pressure.
> Wdyt?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
>> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon :
>> 
>> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>>> +1 to have one repo per spec
>>> 
>>> regards,
>>> 
>>> François
>>> fpa...@apache.org
>>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
 Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
 The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do 
 one repo per atomic release.
 For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or 
 work with infra to bulk migrate it).
 Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
 
 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
 
 
 Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
 écrit :
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I guess you mean for the release ? 
> 
> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s 
> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
> 
> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less 
> convenient anyway).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> > 
> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git 
> > repo, isn't?
> > 
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> > 
> > 
> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I think we can start with this projects:
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >> 
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> >> 
> >> regards,
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org
> >> 
> > 
> 
>