Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
can any one please update the number for version2.2-SNAPSHOT/version in http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/openjpa2/geronimo-plugins.xml? good lock --frank David Jencks wrote: I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits. I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ and set up http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/ with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps from people who have done releases before? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--geronimo-2.2-release-%282nd-try%29-tp26691840s134p26774135.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
The plugins have to be rebuilt for 2.2, as the CAR files include references to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, which the released 2.2 server doesn't include aliases for Once the 2.2 server artifacts have been replicated to the mirror repos, I'll update the openjpa2 plugin and publish new snapshots and update the XML file. David, can you update the XML file for geronimo-2.2? Maybe Ivan or someone else will have time to look at the Samples. -Donald frapien wrote: can any one please update the number for version2.2-SNAPSHOT/version in http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-2.2/geronimo-plugins.xml http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/openjpa2/geronimo-plugins.xml? good lock --frank David Jencks wrote: I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits. I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ and set up http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/ with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps from people who have done releases before?
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: The plugins have to be rebuilt for 2.2, as the CAR files include references to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, which the released 2.2 server doesn't include aliases for Once the 2.2 server artifacts have been replicated to the mirror repos, I'll update the openjpa2 plugin and publish new snapshots and update the XML file. David, can you update the XML file for geronimo-2.2? Maybe Ivan or someone else will have time to look at the Samples. I will look at the Samples. -Donald Forrest
[PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
I've waited long enough. We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet profile tcks. +1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn, linsun (all pmc) no other votes. I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the release download page. thanks david jencks On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits. I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ and set up http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/ with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps from people who have done releases before? Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff? I did this: 123 19:32 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2 127 19:33 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release* ../2.2/ 128 19:35 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/ 129 19:36 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/ *bin.* ../2.2/ 130 19:37 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/ 131 19:38 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/ *bin.* ../2.2/ 132 19:38 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/ 133 19:39 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/ *bin.* ../2.2/ 134 19:40 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/ 135 19:40 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/ *bin.* ../2.2/ 136 19:41 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/ 137 19:42 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/ *bin.* ../2.2/ thanks david jencks On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've waited long enough. We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet profile tcks. +1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn, linsun (all pmc) no other votes. I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the release download page. thanks david jencks On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
You can compare it to the 2.1.4 files located here for reference: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.1.4/ I took a quick look. Things looked fairly similar to what we included in previous releases. Missing from your setup were the LICENSE, NOTICE, and RELEASE_NOTES. I'm not sure how critical the LICENSE NOTICE are ... but it doesn't hurt to include them. I think the RELEASE_NOTES are important because they are typically included in a reference from the download page. I know I sound like a broken record here but I think this is really important with 2.2 because the RELEASE_NOTES are not included in the assembly images. I would personally recommend to include the README in this location as well with a link from the download page for similar reasons with 2.2. I thought I had a script I used for previous release but I can't find it at the moment. One more thing - At one time there were storage issues on the dist server and so we were asked to keep just the most important releases at that location and update all other references on the download pages to the archive. Now that 2.2 is being added we should consider removing 2.1.3 leaving only 2.2 and 2.1.4. Joe David Jencks wrote: I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits. I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ and set up http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/ with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps from people who have done releases before? Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff? I did this: 123 19:32 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2 127 19:33 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release* ../2.2/ 128 19:35 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/ 129 19:36 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/*bin.* ../2.2/ 130 19:37 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/ 131 19:38 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/*bin.* ../2.2/ 132 19:38 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/ 133 19:39 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/*bin.* ../2.2/ 134 19:40 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/ 135 19:40 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/*bin.* ../2.2/ 136 19:41 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/ 137 19:42 cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/*bin.* ../2.2/ thanks david jencks On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've waited long enough. We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet profile tcks. +1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn, linsun (all pmc) no other votes. I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the release download page. thanks david jencks On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
I'm still not happy about the README RELEASE_NOTES missing from the assemblies ... so I was kinda hoping some other more critical problem was found so that we could include these on a re-spin :-) . However, I don't think it makes sense to stop the vote for just that so here is my +1. Everything else I checked looked good. Joe David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
+1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified a few link function okay. Thanks for pulling together this release David. I visited the jira list, it contains hundreds of items! Lin On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:56 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Lin Sun wrote: +1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified a few link function okay. Thanks for pulling together this release David. I visited the jira list, it contains hundreds of items! Indeed, that's an impressive list! Lots of good stuff in this release. Congrats! Bill
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so here's my +1 too. Rick Kevan Miller wrote: Here's my +1. I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/ --kevan On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
+1 from me. I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully. ~Jason Warner On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote: I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so here's my +1 too. Rick Kevan Miller wrote: Here's my +1. I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/ --kevan On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
+1 I built the server from the source tar and was able to deploy and run my app (includes EJBs, JPA, messaging, JSPs). Jay David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
+1 Jason and I also ran the jaspic tck (which is separate from the javaee tck). After a little reconfiguration the servlet profile tests all pass. I'd like to call the vote soon, if you would like to vote please do so soon. thanks david jencks On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jason Warner wrote: +1 from me. I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully. ~Jason Warner On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote: I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so here's my +1 too. Rick Kevan Miller wrote: Here's my +1. I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/ --kevan On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
+1 Ran Tomcat assembly on my Mac with JDK 1.6 and a couple small samples. -Donald David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Here's my +1. I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/ --kevan On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
[VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Hi David, Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are you able to access the links? Thanks Ashish On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gzhttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.ziphttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Ashish Jain wrote: Hi David, Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are you able to access the links? Try this one: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ For some reason, this link is going to the -024 version, not the -043 version in David's email. Rick Thanks Ashish On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin. This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220styleName=Htmlversion=12312965 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks
