RE: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Oh, it's clear now. Thank you very much for your answer! Waiting for the next release impatiently. :) Nellya. -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:10 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL I was planning on some changes to TranQL for CMP support but didn't get them completed on time. I thought it would be unfair to hold up the release because of my delinquency so I regressed to 1.3. The changes should be in 1.1.2 or 1.2. Udovichenko, Nellya wrote: > Hello, Matt! > > > > I have downloaded Geronimo-1.1.1-rc2 and see TranQL version is 1.3 there instead of 1.3.1 > > I expected. > > > > Kevan Miller wrote that's due to there haven't been any changes to TranQL since 1.3 > > (see topic "TranQL version in Geronimo-1.1.1-rc1" yesterday). > > > > Does it mean the support for transaction isolation level setting would only be > > available in TranQL 1.4? > > > > Nellya. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:41 PM > > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL > > > > Vasily, > > > > It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of > > Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can > > get this in 1.1.1. > > > > Matt > > > > Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: > >> Hi, Matt, > > >> What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the > >> transaction isolation level in TranQL? > > >> I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a > >> successful SPECjAppServer2004 run... > > >> Recently you said > >> (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html <http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html> ) > >> that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a > >> part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right? > > >> Thank you! > > >> Vasily Zakharov > >> Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > > > >
Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
I was planning on some changes to TranQL for CMP support but didn't get them completed on time. I thought it would be unfair to hold up the release because of my delinquency so I regressed to 1.3. The changes should be in 1.1.2 or 1.2. Udovichenko, Nellya wrote: Hello, Matt! I have downloaded Geronimo-1.1.1-rc2 and see TranQL version is 1.3 there instead of 1.3.1 I expected. Kevan Miller wrote that's due to there haven't been any changes to TranQL since 1.3 (see topic "TranQL version in Geronimo-1.1.1-rc1" yesterday). Does it mean the support for transaction isolation level setting would only be available in TranQL 1.4? Nellya. -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:41 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL Vasily, It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can get this in 1.1.1. Matt Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the transaction isolation level in TranQL? I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a successful SPECjAppServer2004 run... Recently you said (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html <http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html> ) that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right? Thank you! Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division
RE: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Hello, Matt! I have downloaded Geronimo-1.1.1-rc2 and see TranQL version is 1.3 there instead of 1.3.1 I expected. Kevan Miller wrote that's due to there haven't been any changes to TranQL since 1.3 (see topic "TranQL version in Geronimo-1.1.1-rc1" yesterday). Does it mean the support for transaction isolation level setting would only be available in TranQL 1.4? Nellya. -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:41 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL Vasily, It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can get this in 1.1.1. Matt Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: > Hi, Matt, > > What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the > transaction isolation level in TranQL? > > I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a > successful SPECjAppServer2004 run... > > Recently you said > (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html) > that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a > part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right? > > Thank you! > > Vasily Zakharov > Intel Middleware Products Division > > >
Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Vasily, It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can get this in 1.1.1. Matt Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the transaction isolation level in TranQL? I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a successful SPECjAppServer2004 run... Recently you said (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html) that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right? Thank you! Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division
