[VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 (HBase-1.1. 3RC0) is available for download at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, available in the Apache keys directory https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc There's also a signed tag for this release at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been published for your review, at http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 release. Notable correctness fixes include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and HBASE-13250. The full list of fixes included in this release is available at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as HBase 1.1.3. Thanks, Nick
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
+1 (non-binding) * Built from source * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was problematic, might have just been me. * Checked sigs/xsums * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new deps for licensing concerns (found none) Nick Dimiduk wrote: I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 (HBase-1.1. 3RC0) is available for download at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, available in the Apache keys directory https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc There's also a signed tag for this release at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been published for your review, at http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 release. Notable correctness fixes include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and HBASE-13250. The full list of fixes included in this release is available at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as HBase 1.1.3. Thanks, Nick
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
Thank you Josh for taking time to evaluate this release candidate. A reminder to others that the voting period is scheduled to expire in roughly 24 hours. I myself have not had time this week to evaluate this candidate properly, so I would like to extend the voting period through the weekend. If there are no objections I will tally the vote at 23:59 on Sunday, November 15, Pacific time. Thanks, Nick On Tuesday, November 10, 2015, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > * Built from source > * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was > problematic, might have just been me. > * Checked sigs/xsums > * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) > * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new deps > for licensing concerns (found none) > > Nick Dimiduk wrote: > >> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >> (HBase-1.1. >> 3RC0) is available for download at >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >> >> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >> >> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >> available in the Apache keys directory >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >> >> There's also a signed tag for this release at >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >> >> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >> published for your review, at >> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >> >> HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing >> on >> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL >> communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >> release. Notable correctness fixes >> include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >> HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and >> HBASE-13250. >> >> The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 >> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. >> >> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on >> Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >> HBase >> 1.1.3. >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
For my part, my vote is +0, pending review of compatibility report. My vote is +1 assuming we can get a clean report. - download tarballs, verified signatures vs below ndimiduk.asc and KEYS file in dist repo - verified none of rej, orig, java, or scala files in the bin tgz - verified none of rej, orig, class, jar files in the src tgz - inspected site and docs in bin tgz, looks good - build from source vs all combinations of openjdk-1.7.0_79, openjdk-1.8.0_45, and hadoop versions 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.7.0, 2.7.1 - ran in local mode with LoadTestTool, FAST_DIFF, 1mm rows; passed. I noticed client connection log entries in the master .out file. I've never noticed this; it was unexpected but not harmful. - inspected linked compatibility report. I'm not convinced it is working properly as even the acknowledged changes we observed in 1.1.2 [0] are not reported. Thoughts Sean? - ran stack's hbase-downstreamer [0] project `mvn clean package` vs staging maven repo. Tests pass. - ran Dmitry's shaded-client downstreamer project [1] vs staging maven repo and bin tarball, versions adjusted for the release candidate. Test app runs successfully. Thanks, Nick [0]: https://github.com/saintstack/hbase-downstreamer [1]: https://github.com/dminkovsky/HBASE-13889 On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Thank you Josh for taking time to evaluate this release candidate. A > reminder to others that the voting period is scheduled to expire in roughly > 24 hours. I myself have not had time this week to evaluate this candidate > properly, so I would like to extend the voting period through the weekend. > If there are no objections I will tally the vote at 23:59 on Sunday, > November 15, Pacific time. > > Thanks, > Nick > > > On Tuesday, November 10, 2015, Josh Elser wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> * Built from source >> * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was >> problematic, might have just been me. >> * Checked sigs/xsums >> * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) >> * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new >> deps for licensing concerns (found none) >> >> Nick Dimiduk wrote: >> >>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >>> (HBase-1.1. >>> 3RC0) is available for download at >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >>> >>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >>> >>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >>> available in the Apache keys directory >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >>> >>> There's also a signed tag for this release at >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >>> >>> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >>> published for your review, at >>> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >>> >>> HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing >>> on >>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL >>> communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >>> release. Notable correctness fixes >>> include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >>> HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and >>> HBASE-13250. >>> >>> The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 >>> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. >>> >>> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on >>> Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >>> HBase >>> 1.1.3. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >>> >>>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
What is the specific compatibility issue? By default the tool will only look at classes we annotate as Public or LimitedPrivate. Maybe that's why some changes you are expecting to be called out are not present in the report? > On Nov 15, 2015, at 3:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > For my part, my vote is +0, pending review of compatibility report. My vote > is +1 assuming we can get a clean report. > > - download tarballs, verified signatures vs below ndimiduk.asc and KEYS > file in dist repo > - verified none of rej, orig, java, or scala files in the bin tgz > - verified none of rej, orig, class, jar files in the src tgz > - inspected site and docs in bin tgz, looks good > - build from source vs all combinations of openjdk-1.7.0_79, > openjdk-1.8.0_45, and hadoop versions 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, > 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.7.0, 2.7.1 > - ran in local mode with LoadTestTool, FAST_DIFF, 1mm rows; passed. I > noticed client connection log entries in the master .out file. I've never > noticed this; it was unexpected but not harmful. > - inspected linked compatibility report. I'm not convinced it is working > properly as even the acknowledged changes we observed in 1.1.2 [0] are not > reported. Thoughts Sean? > - ran stack's hbase-downstreamer [0] project `mvn clean package` vs staging > maven repo. Tests pass. > - ran Dmitry's shaded-client downstreamer project [1] vs staging maven repo > and bin tarball, versions adjusted for the release candidate. Test app runs > successfully. > > Thanks, > Nick > > [0]: https://github.com/saintstack/hbase-downstreamer > [1]: https://github.com/dminkovsky/HBASE-13889 > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: >> >> Thank you Josh for taking time to evaluate this release candidate. A >> reminder to others that the voting period is scheduled to expire in roughly >> 24 hours. I myself have not had time this week to evaluate this candidate >> properly, so I would like to extend the voting period through the weekend. >> If there are no objections I will tally the vote at 23:59 on Sunday, >> November 15, Pacific time. >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >> >>> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> * Built from source >>> * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was >>> problematic, might have just been me. >>> * Checked sigs/xsums >>> * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) >>> * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new >>> deps for licensing concerns (found none) >>> >>> Nick Dimiduk wrote: >>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 (HBase-1.1. 3RC0) is available for download at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, available in the Apache keys directory https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc There's also a signed tag for this release at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been published for your review, at http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 release. Notable correctness fixes include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and HBASE-13250. The full list of fixes included in this release is available at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as HBase 1.1.3. Thanks, Nick
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
The issue is not in the product but in the report generation. It seems the reporting tool does not work correctly on my new hardware. I ran it on another machine and this one looks correct. I've updated the file, at the same address [0]. This report shows a number of added methods, but still reports compatible. Thus I'm upgrading my vote to +1. [0]: http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > What is the specific compatibility issue? > > By default the tool will only look at classes we annotate as Public or > LimitedPrivate. Maybe that's why some changes you are expecting to be > called out are not present in the report? > > > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 3:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > > For my part, my vote is +0, pending review of compatibility report. My > vote > > is +1 assuming we can get a clean report. > > > > - download tarballs, verified signatures vs below ndimiduk.asc and KEYS > > file in dist repo > > - verified none of rej, orig, java, or scala files in the bin tgz > > - verified none of rej, orig, class, jar files in the src tgz > > - inspected site and docs in bin tgz, looks good > > - build from source vs all combinations of openjdk-1.7.0_79, > > openjdk-1.8.0_45, and hadoop versions 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, > > 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.7.0, 2.7.1 > > - ran in local mode with LoadTestTool, FAST_DIFF, 1mm rows; passed. I > > noticed client connection log entries in the master .out file. I've never > > noticed this; it was unexpected but not harmful. > > - inspected linked compatibility report. I'm not convinced it is working > > properly as even the acknowledged changes we observed in 1.1.2 [0] are > not > > reported. Thoughts Sean? > > - ran stack's hbase-downstreamer [0] project `mvn clean package` vs > staging > > maven repo. Tests pass. > > - ran Dmitry's shaded-client downstreamer project [1] vs staging maven > repo > > and bin tarball, versions adjusted for the release candidate. Test app > runs > > successfully. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > [0]: https://github.com/saintstack/hbase-downstreamer > > [1]: https://github.com/dminkovsky/HBASE-13889 > > > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk > wrote: > >> > >> Thank you Josh for taking time to evaluate this release candidate. A > >> reminder to others that the voting period is scheduled to expire in > roughly > >> 24 hours. I myself have not had time this week to evaluate this > candidate > >> properly, so I would like to extend the voting period through the > weekend. > >> If there are no objections I will tally the vote at 23:59 on Sunday, > >> November 15, Pacific time. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Nick > >> > >> > >>> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015, Josh Elser > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> * Built from source > >>> * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was > >>> problematic, might have just been me. > >>> * Checked sigs/xsums > >>> * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) > >>> * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new > >>> deps for licensing concerns (found none) > >>> > >>> Nick Dimiduk wrote: > >>> > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > (HBase-1.1. > 3RC0) is available for download at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > available in the Apache keys directory > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > published for your review, at > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, > continuing > on > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > NoSQL > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 > release. Notable correctness fixes > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and > HBASE-13250. > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on > Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
+1 Everything looks to be in the correct location. Spun up a regionserver inserted some things. On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > The issue is not in the product but in the report generation. It seems the > reporting tool does not work correctly on my new hardware. I ran it on > another machine and this one looks correct. I've updated the file, at the > same address [0]. > > This report shows a number of added methods, but still reports compatible. > Thus I'm upgrading my vote to +1. > > [0]: http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > What is the specific compatibility issue? > > > > By default the tool will only look at classes we annotate as Public or > > LimitedPrivate. Maybe that's why some changes you are expecting to be > > called out are not present in the report? > > > > > > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 3:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > > > > For my part, my vote is +0, pending review of compatibility report. My > > vote > > > is +1 assuming we can get a clean report. > > > > > > - download tarballs, verified signatures vs below ndimiduk.asc and KEYS > > > file in dist repo > > > - verified none of rej, orig, java, or scala files in the bin tgz > > > - verified none of rej, orig, class, jar files in the src tgz > > > - inspected site and docs in bin tgz, looks good > > > - build from source vs all combinations of openjdk-1.7.0_79, > > > openjdk-1.8.0_45, and hadoop versions 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, > 2.5.0, > > > 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.7.0, 2.7.1 > > > - ran in local mode with LoadTestTool, FAST_DIFF, 1mm rows; passed. I > > > noticed client connection log entries in the master .out file. I've > never > > > noticed this; it was unexpected but not harmful. > > > - inspected linked compatibility report. I'm not convinced it is > working > > > properly as even the acknowledged changes we observed in 1.1.2 [0] are > > not > > > reported. Thoughts Sean? > > > - ran stack's hbase-downstreamer [0] project `mvn clean package` vs > > staging > > > maven repo. Tests pass. > > > - ran Dmitry's shaded-client downstreamer project [1] vs staging maven > > repo > > > and bin tarball, versions adjusted for the release candidate. Test app > > runs > > > successfully. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nick > > > > > > [0]: https://github.com/saintstack/hbase-downstreamer > > > [1]: https://github.com/dminkovsky/HBASE-13889 > > > > > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Thank you Josh for taking time to evaluate this release candidate. A > > >> reminder to others that the voting period is scheduled to expire in > > roughly > > >> 24 hours. I myself have not had time this week to evaluate this > > candidate > > >> properly, so I would like to extend the voting period through the > > weekend. > > >> If there are no objections I will tally the vote at 23:59 on Sunday, > > >> November 15, Pacific time. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Nick > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015, Josh Elser > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>> > > >>> * Built from source > > >>> * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was > > >>> problematic, might have just been me. > > >>> * Checked sigs/xsums > > >>> * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) > > >>> * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new > > >>> deps for licensing concerns (found none) > > >>> > > >>> Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > >>> > > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > > (HBase-1.1. > > 3RC0) is available for download at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > available in the Apache keys directory > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > > > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has > been > > published for your review, at > > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > > > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, > > continuing > > on > > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > > NoSQL > > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the > 1.1.2 > > release. Notable correctness fixes > > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, > > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and > > H
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
+1 Checked signature and sums Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good Built from source RAT check passes Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported latencies in line with expectations Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > (HBase-1.1. > 3RC0) is available for download at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > available in the Apache keys directory > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > published for your review, at > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing on > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 > release. Notable correctness fixes > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and > HBASE-13250. > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on > Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as HBase > 1.1.3. > > Thanks, > Nick > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
-1. I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: A run of bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 randomWrite 10 results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: 075868 at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 > > Checked signature and sums > Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good > Built from source > RAT check passes > Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported > latencies in line with expectations > Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > > (HBase-1.1. > > 3RC0) is available for download at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > available in the Apache keys directory > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > > > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > > published for your review, at > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > > > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing > on > > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL > > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 > > release. Notable correctness fixes > > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, > > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and > > HBASE-13250. > > > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 > > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on > > Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as > HBase > > 1.1.3. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > >- Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 RC as well. Enis On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > -1. > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > A run of > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > randomWrite 10 > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > 075868 > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Checked signature and sums >> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good >> Built from source >> RAT check passes >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported >> latencies in line with expectations >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: >> >> > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >> > (HBase-1.1. >> > 3RC0) is available for download at >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >> > >> > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >> > >> > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >> > available in the Apache keys directory >> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >> > >> > There's also a signed tag for this release at >> > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >> > >> > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >> > published for your review, at >> > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >> > >> > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, >> continuing on >> > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and >> NoSQL >> > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >> > release. Notable correctness fixes >> > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >> > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and >> > HBASE-13250. >> > >> > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 >> > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. >> > >> > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on >> > Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >> HBase >> > 1.1.3. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Nick >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >>- Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > >
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
Okay, good find Enis. On Tuesday, November 17, 2015, Enis Söztutar wrote: > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 RC > as well. > > > Enis > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar > wrote: > > > -1. > > > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > > > > A run of > > > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > > randomWrite 10 > > > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > 075868 > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell > > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Checked signature and sums > >> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good > >> Built from source > >> RAT check passes > >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported > >> latencies in line with expectations > >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk > wrote: > >> > >> > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > >> > (HBase-1.1. > >> > 3RC0) is available for download at > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > >> > > >> > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > >> > > >> > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > >> > available in the Apache keys directory > >> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > >> > > >> > There's also a signed tag for this release at > >> > > >> > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > >> > > >> > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > >> > published for your review, at > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > >> > > >> > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, > >> continuing on > >> > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > >> NoSQL > >> > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 > >> > release. Notable correctness fixes > >> > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, > >> > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and > >> > HBASE-13250. > >> > > >> > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > >> > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 > >> > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > >> > > >> > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on > >> > Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as > >> HBase > >> > 1.1.3. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Nick > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> > >>- Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > >> (via Tom White) > >> > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
Indeed interesting that LTT doesn't catch it. > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > > -1. > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > A run of > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 randomWrite > 10 > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > 075868 >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) >at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) >at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) >at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) >at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) >at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Checked signature and sums >> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good >> Built from source >> RAT check passes >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported >> latencies in line with expectations >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors >> >> >>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: >>> >>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >>> (HBase-1.1. >>> 3RC0) is available for download at >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >>> >>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >>> >>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >>> available in the Apache keys directory >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >>> >>> There's also a signed tag for this release at >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >>> >>> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >>> published for your review, at >>> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >>> >>> HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing >> on >>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL >>> communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >>> release. Notable correctness fixes >>> include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >>> HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and >>> HBASE-13250. >>> >>> The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 >>> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. >>> >>> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on >>> Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >> HBase >>> 1.1.3. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting there (or perhaps just not in the same way) > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 RC > as well. > > > Enis > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: >> >> -1. >> >> I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: >> >> >> A run of >> >> bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 >> randomWrite 10 >> >> results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. >> >> Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. >> >> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: >> 075868 >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) >>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Checked signature and sums >>> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good >>> Built from source >>> RAT check passes >>> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported >>> latencies in line with expectations >>> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 (HBase-1.1. 3RC0) is available for download at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, available in the Apache keys directory https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc There's also a signed tag for this release at >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been published for your review, at http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, >>> continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and >>> NoSQL communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 release. Notable correctness fixes include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and HBASE-13250. The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >>> HBase 1.1.3. Thanks, Nick >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White) >> >>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
With HBASE-14689 resolved, I plan to spin the next RC this weekend. Let me know if you have any concerns. -n On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting there > (or perhaps just not in the same way) > > > > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > > > > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 RC > > as well. > > > > > > Enis > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar > wrote: > >> > >> -1. > >> > >> I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > >> > >> > >> A run of > >> > >> bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > >> randomWrite 10 > >> > >> results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > >> > >> Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > >> > >> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > 075868 > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > >>at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > >>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Checked signature and sums > >>> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good > >>> Built from source > >>> RAT check passes > >>> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported > >>> latencies in line with expectations > >>> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk > wrote: > > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > (HBase-1.1. > 3RC0) is available for download at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > available in the Apache keys directory > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > published for your review, at > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, > >>> continuing on > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > >>> NoSQL > communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 > release. Notable correctness fixes > include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, > HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and > HBASE-13250. > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on > Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as > >>> HBase > 1.1.3. > > Thanks, > Nick > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> - Andy > >>> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>> (via Tom White) > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
I found some source-incompatible changes in the compatibility report [0]. Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for 1.1.x and 1.0.x. Since I'm asking, would be good to see the last mile on HBASE-14822 and HBASE-14844. [0]: http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html#Type_Source_Problems_High On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > With HBASE-14689 resolved, I plan to spin the next RC this weekend. Let me > know if you have any concerns. > > -n > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > >> Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting there >> (or perhaps just not in the same way) >> >> >> > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: >> > >> > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 >> RC >> > as well. >> > >> > >> > Enis >> > >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar >> wrote: >> >> >> >> -1. >> >> >> >> I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: >> >> >> >> >> >> A run of >> >> >> >> bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 >> >> randomWrite 10 >> >> >> >> results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. >> >> >> >> Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. >> >> >> >> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: >> 075868 >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) >> >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) >> >>at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) >> >>at >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) >> >>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> Checked signature and sums >> >>> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good >> >>> Built from source >> >>> RAT check passes >> >>> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported >> >>> latencies in line with expectations >> >>> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk >> wrote: >> >> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >> (HBase-1.1. >> 3RC0) is available for download at >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >> >> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >> >> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >> available in the Apache keys directory >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >> >> There's also a signed tag for this release at >> >>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >> >> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >> published for your review, at >> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >> >> HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, >> >>> continuing on >> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and >> >>> NoSQL >> communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >> release. Notable correctness fixes >> include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >> HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and >> HBASE-13250. >> >> The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 >> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. >> >> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on >> Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >> >>> HBase >> 1.1.3. >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Best
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
> Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for 1.1.x and 1.0.x. I don't think we could leave the underlying problems with incorrect user context for security alone on branches 1.0 and 1.1 unfixed. We can revert this stuff - these changes are at the end of a cascade of changes stemming from bug fixing - but then for sake of correct functioning of security features we'd want to move people to 1.2. > On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > I found some source-incompatible changes in the compatibility report [0]. > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for 1.1.x > and 1.0.x. Since I'm asking, would be good to see the last mile > on HBASE-14822 and HBASE-14844. > > [0]: > http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html#Type_Source_Problems_High > >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: >> >> With HBASE-14689 resolved, I plan to spin the next RC this weekend. Let me >> know if you have any concerns. >> >> -n >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Andrew Purtell >> wrote: >> >>> Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting there >>> (or perhaps just not in the same way) >>> >>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 >>> RC as well. Enis > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar >>> wrote: > > -1. > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > A run of > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > randomWrite 10 > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: >>> 075868 > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Checked signature and sums >> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good >> Built from source >> RAT check passes >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported >> latencies in line with expectations >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors >> >> >>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >>> (HBase-1.1. >>> 3RC0) is available for download at >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >>> >>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >>> >>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >>> available in the Apache keys directory >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >>> >>> There's also a signed tag for this release at >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >>> >>> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >>> published for your review, at >>> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >>> >>> HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, >> continuing on >>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and >> NoSQL >>> communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >>> release. Notable correctness fixes >>> include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >>> HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
So it's either EOL 1.0 (already intended) and 1.1 due to these security bugs, or ship a source-incompatible patch release? The classes are all marked LimitedPrivate("coprocessors"), so the scope it's as wide as it could be. Is it not possible to provide default implementations of the new methods? On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for 1.1.x > and 1.0.x. > > I don't think we could leave the underlying problems with incorrect user > context for security alone on branches 1.0 and 1.1 unfixed. We can revert > this stuff - these changes are at the end of a cascade of changes stemming > from bug fixing - but then for sake of correct functioning of security > features we'd want to move people to 1.2. > > > > > On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > > I found some source-incompatible changes in the compatibility report [0]. > > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for 1.1.x > > and 1.0.x. Since I'm asking, would be good to see the last mile > > on HBASE-14822 and HBASE-14844. > > > > [0]: > > > http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html#Type_Source_Problems_High > > > >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Nick Dimiduk > wrote: > >> > >> With HBASE-14689 resolved, I plan to spin the next RC this weekend. Let > me > >> know if you have any concerns. > >> > >> -n > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Andrew Purtell < > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting there > >>> (or perhaps just not in the same way) > >>> > >>> > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar > wrote: > > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the 0.98 > >>> RC > as well. > > > Enis > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar > >>> wrote: > > > > -1. > > > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > > > > A run of > > > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > > randomWrite 10 > > > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > >>> 075868 > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > > at > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > > at > >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell > > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Checked signature and sums > >> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good > >> Built from source > >> RAT check passes > >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, > reported > >> latencies in line with expectations > >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors > >> > >> > >>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 > >>> (HBase-1.1. > >>> 3RC0) is available for download at > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ > >>> > >>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 > >>> > >>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey > 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > >>> available in the Apache keys directory > >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > >>> > >>> There's also a signed tag for this release at > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f > >>> > >>> The detailed
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
> So it's either EOL 1.0 (already intended) and 1.1 due to these security bugs, or ship a source-incompatible patch release? I opened HBASE-14944 for this > Is it not possible to provide default implementations of the new methods? We did. The addition of the new methods to the interfaces is what is triggering the source compatibility warning. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > So it's either EOL 1.0 (already intended) and 1.1 due to these security > bugs, or ship a source-incompatible patch release? The classes are all > marked LimitedPrivate("coprocessors"), so the scope it's as wide as it > could be. Is it not possible to provide default implementations of the new > methods? > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for > 1.1.x > > and 1.0.x. > > > > I don't think we could leave the underlying problems with incorrect user > > context for security alone on branches 1.0 and 1.1 unfixed. We can revert > > this stuff - these changes are at the end of a cascade of changes > stemming > > from bug fixing - but then for sake of correct functioning of security > > features we'd want to move people to 1.2. > > > > > > > > > On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > > > > I found some source-incompatible changes in the compatibility report > [0]. > > > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for > 1.1.x > > > and 1.0.x. Since I'm asking, would be good to see the last mile > > > on HBASE-14822 and HBASE-14844. > > > > > > [0]: > > > > > > http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html#Type_Source_Problems_High > > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Nick Dimiduk > > wrote: > > >> > > >> With HBASE-14689 resolved, I plan to spin the next RC this weekend. > Let > > me > > >> know if you have any concerns. > > >> > > >> -n > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting > there > > >>> (or perhaps just not in the same way) > > >>> > > >>> > > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar > > wrote: > > > > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the > 0.98 > > >>> RC > > as well. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > -1. > > > > > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > > > > > > > A run of > > > > > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > > > randomWrite 10 > > > > > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > > > > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > > > > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > > >>> 075868 > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > > > at > > >>> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > > > at > > >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Checked signature and sums > > >> Unpacked binary and source tarballs, contents look good > > >> Built from source > > >> RAT check passes > > >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, > > reported > > >> latencies in line with expectations > > >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk < > ndimi...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'm happy to
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.3 (RC0) is available
For anyone who's not following along on HBASE-14944, I added a comment based on the fine explanation provided by Andrew and the wording in our book. Unless there are objections, I will cary on with the release, including these changes. If you do have an objection, please speak up. Thanks, Nick On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > > So it's either EOL 1.0 (already intended) and 1.1 due to these security > bugs, > or ship a source-incompatible patch release? > > I opened HBASE-14944 for this > > > Is it not possible to provide default implementations of the new methods? > > We did. The addition of the new methods to the interfaces is what is > triggering the source compatibility warning. > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > > > So it's either EOL 1.0 (already intended) and 1.1 due to these security > > bugs, or ship a source-incompatible patch release? The classes are all > > marked LimitedPrivate("coprocessors"), so the scope it's as wide as it > > could be. Is it not possible to provide default implementations of the > new > > methods? > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell > > > wrote: > > > > > > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for > > 1.1.x > > > and 1.0.x. > > > > > > I don't think we could leave the underlying problems with incorrect > user > > > context for security alone on branches 1.0 and 1.1 unfixed. We can > revert > > > this stuff - these changes are at the end of a cascade of changes > > stemming > > > from bug fixing - but then for sake of correct functioning of security > > > features we'd want to move people to 1.2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk > wrote: > > > > > > > > I found some source-incompatible changes in the compatibility report > > [0]. > > > > Reopened HBASE-14605, HBASE-14655, and HBASE-14631 as blockers for > > 1.1.x > > > > and 1.0.x. Since I'm asking, would be good to see the last mile > > > > on HBASE-14822 and HBASE-14844. > > > > > > > > [0]: > > > > > > > > > > http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html#Type_Source_Problems_High > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Nick Dimiduk > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> With HBASE-14689 resolved, I plan to spin the next RC this weekend. > > Let > > > me > > > >> know if you have any concerns. > > > >> > > > >> -n > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Let's revert this from 0.98 even if the problem isn't manifesting > > there > > > >>> (or perhaps just not in the same way) > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Enis Söztutar > > > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for the trouble, let me revert the commit. I'll look at the > > 0.98 > > > >>> RC > > > as well. > > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Enis Söztutar < > enis@gmail.com > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > -1. > > > > > > > > I think this RC is also affected by HBASE-14689: > > > > > > > > > > > > A run of > > > > > > > > bin/hbase pe --latency --nomapred --presplit=10 --valueSize=10 > > > > randomWrite 10 > > > > > > > > results in client hang and a lot of following exceptions. > > > > > > > > Interesting that, I cannot reproduce this with LTT. > > > > > > > > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: > > > >>> 075868 > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:5088) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2980) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2838) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2780) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:692) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:654) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2036) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:32303) > > > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2117) > > > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:104) > > > > at > > > >>> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133) > > > > at > > > >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108) > > > > at java.lang.