Re: simple-conf branch
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:58:26PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: Please take a look at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/ This is my long-threatened project to massively simplify the basic httpd.conf by splitting a bunch of stuff out into smaller files in the extra/ directory that are not included by default. As long as the default is a single file, then I'm cool with this. The key here is that the gazillion little .conf files are *not* included in the default .conf file. That would be a pain because changes could involve one or more of N separate files. So: given that... I'm very supportive of a smaller default file. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Re: svn commit: r159797 - in httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf: extra/httpd-mpm.conf httpd-std.conf.in
Euh... don't we need one of those for proper operation? Or do they all have defaults, so a .conf isn't really needed? On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:16:08PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: slive Date: Sat Apr 2 11:16:07 2005 New Revision: 159797 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=159797 Log: Move mpm config to extra/ Added: httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/httpd-std.conf.in Added: httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf?view=autorev=159797 == --- httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf (added) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf Sat Apr 2 11:16:07 2005 @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +# +# Server-Pool Size Regulation (MPM specific) +# +# Only one of the below sections will be relevant on your +# installed httpd. Use apachectl -l to find out the +# active mpm. + + +# prefork MPM +# StartServers: number of server processes to start +# MinSpareServers: minimum number of server processes which are kept spare +# MaxSpareServers: maximum number of server processes which are kept spare +# MaxClients: maximum number of server processes allowed to start +# MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves +IfModule mpm_prefork_module +StartServers 5 +MinSpareServers 5 +MaxSpareServers 10 +MaxClients 150 +MaxRequestsPerChild 0 +/IfModule + +# worker MPM +# StartServers: initial number of server processes to start +# MaxClients: maximum number of simultaneous client connections +# MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare +# MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare +# ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in each server process +# MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves +IfModule mpm_worker_module +StartServers 2 +MaxClients 150 +MinSpareThreads 25 +MaxSpareThreads 75 +ThreadsPerChild 25 +MaxRequestsPerChild 0 +/IfModule + +# perchild MPM +# NumServers: constant number of server processes +# StartThreads: initial number of worker threads in each server process +# MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare +# MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare +# MaxThreadsPerChild: maximum number of worker threads in each server process +# MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of connections per server process +IfModule mpm_perchild_module +NumServers5 +StartThreads 5 +MinSpareThreads 5 +MaxSpareThreads 10 +MaxThreadsPerChild 20 +MaxRequestsPerChild 0 +/IfModule + +# WinNT MPM +# ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in the server process +# MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves +IfModule mpm_winnt_module +ThreadsPerChild 250 +MaxRequestsPerChild 0 +/IfModule + +# BeOS MPM +# StartThreads: how many threads do we initially spawn? +# MaxClients: max number of threads we can have (1 thread == 1 client) +# MaxRequestsPerThread: maximum number of requests each thread will process +IfModule mpm_beos_module +StartThreads10 +MaxClients 50 +MaxRequestsPerThread 1 +/IfModule + +# NetWare MPM +# ThreadStackSize: Stack size allocated for each worker thread +# StartThreads: Number of worker threads launched at server startup +# MinSpareThreads: Minimum number of idle threads, to handle request spikes +# MaxSpareThreads: Maximum number of idle threads +# MaxThreads: Maximum number of worker threads alive at the same time +# MaxRequestsPerChild: Maximum number of requests a thread serves. It is +# recommended that the default value of 0 be set for this +# directive on NetWare. This will allow the thread to +# continue to service requests indefinitely. +IfModule mpm_netware_module +ThreadStackSize 65536 +StartThreads 250 +MinSpareThreads 25 +MaxSpareThreads250 +MaxThreads1000 +MaxRequestsPerChild 0 +MaxMemFree 100 +/IfModule + +# OS/2 MPM +# StartServers: Number of server processes to maintain +# MinSpareThreads: Minimum number of idle threads per process, +# to handle request spikes +# MaxSpareThreads: Maximum number of idle threads per process +# MaxRequestsPerChild: Maximum number of connections per server process
Re: svn commit: r159797 - in httpd/httpd/branches/simple-conf/docs/conf: extra/httpd-mpm.conf httpd-std.conf.in
* Greg Stein wrote: Euh... don't we need one of those for proper operation? Or do they all have defaults, so a .conf isn't really needed? Yes, they have (of course ;-). nd -- Das Verhalten von Gates hatte mir bewiesen, dass ich auf ihn und seine beiden Gefährten nicht zu zählen brauchte -- Karl May, Winnetou III Im Westen was neues: http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2
[2.0 PATCH PR#31302] SSI #exec cmd and suexec
[Seems that my first attempt didn't get through - maybe because I was not yet subscribed? I didn't get a bounce message, however. Anyway, here it's again.] It's been almost 2 months since 2.0.53. Think it is time for 2.0.54 yet? Any chances that the fix I proposed for PR#31302 (suexec doesn't execute commands if they're not in the current dir) finds its way into 2.0.54? I have followed Ryan Bloom's advice of how to fix the issue properly, trying to be as portable as possible (e.g. by using ap_os_is_path_absolute() and apr_filepath_merge()). Comments welcome. The bug was initially submitted on 2004-09-19; there is also a duplicate (29534) from 2004-06-12. Thanks, Kaspar
Do these broken clients still exist?
Does someone with a high-traffic, general-interest web site want to take a look through their logs for these user-agent strings. I don't mind keeping them if they make up even 1/100 of a percent of the trafic, but it seems silly to keep these extra regexes on every single request if these clients don't exist anymore in the wild. # # The following directives modify normal HTTP response behavior to # handle known problems with browser implementations. # BrowserMatch Mozilla/2 nokeepalive BrowserMatch MSIE 4\.0b2; nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 BrowserMatch RealPlayer 4\.0 force-response-1.0 BrowserMatch Java/1\.0 force-response-1.0 BrowserMatch JDK/1\.0 force-response-1.0 Joshua.
Re: Do these broken clients still exist?
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:56PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: BrowserMatch Mozilla/2 nokeepalive I don't know about the rest, but Ask Jeeves spoofs this user-agent in its webcrawls; Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma; +http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/tech_crawling.html) Not sure if the crawler supports keepalives, but either way it's a (somewhat artificial) source of requests matching the useragent. -- Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Do these broken clients still exist?
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:56PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: Does someone with a high-traffic, general-interest web site want to take a look through their logs for these user-agent strings. I don't mind keeping them if they make up even 1/100 of a percent of the trafic, but it seems silly to keep these extra regexes on every single request if these clients don't exist anymore in the wild. [snip] BrowserMatch Mozilla/2 nokeepalive I still see this; .001% of ~2M requests from the following full UA strings: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma; +http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/tech_crawling.html) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MS FrontPage 4.0) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MS FrontPage 5.0) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Update a; AK; Windows 95) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows 95) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320) BlackBerry7100/4.0.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.0; Windows 95) Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.0b; AOL 4.0; Windows 3.1) --n -- huey dd of=/dev/fd0 if=/dev/flippy bs=1024 huey ^^^ Making Flippy Floppy
[2.0 PATCH PR#31302] SSI #exec cmd and suexec
It's been almost 2 months since 2.0.53. Think it is time for 2.0.54 yet? Any chances that the fix I proposed for PR#31302 (suexec doesn't execute commands if they're not in the current dir) finds its way into 2.0.54? I have followed Ryan Bloom's advice of how to fix the issue properly, trying to be as portable as possible (e.g. by using ap_os_is_path_absolute() and apr_filepath_merge()). Comments welcome. The bug was initially submitted on 2004-09-19; there is also a duplicate (29534) from 2004-06-12. Thanks, Kaspar
Re: Do these broken clients still exist?
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:56PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: Does someone with a high-traffic, general-interest web site want to take a look through their logs for these user-agent strings. I, uh, have just a few logs that I can scan. ;-) I'll use Blogger/BlogSpot logs, as those will have a wider variety of user agents than the main Google site. (which is fortunate, as I don't have access to the main logs anyways) A week or two of logs should provide good coverage. You never know what times of day, or days of the week, that a given UA might be active. I don't mind keeping them if they make up even 1/100 of a percent of the trafic, but it seems silly to keep these extra regexes on every single request if these clients don't exist anymore in the wild. I'll take a look at some logs tomorrow, and mail back with some results. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Re: Do these broken clients still exist?
On Apr 3, 2005, at 7:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:56PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: Does someone with a high-traffic, general-interest web site want to take a look through their logs for these user-agent strings. I, uh, have just a few logs that I can scan. ;-) Showoff. :-)
