Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Know I see what you mean. Those two tabs ("Configuration without
persistence" and "Configuration with persistence") don't just switch code
snippet, they show different content + code snippets depending on if you
set up Ignite persistence or not. That technique was used for the K8
instructions intentionally.

-
Denis


On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:02 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:

> I know that if the content of codeblock(tabs) is a code snippet, it has
> a background color. If it's a markdown text, it's not.
> In other words, the background color is the background color of the code
> snippet, not the background color of codeblock.
>
> 在 2020/10/6 上午7:31, Denis Magda 写道:
> > Hey, thanks for keep checking the content and behavior of the new docs.
> > This helps a lot!
> >
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> >> This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only
> >> descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the
> >> original one.
> >
> > Hmm, good remark. @Peter Ivanov , for some reason,
> > Artem didn't port the RPM instructions.
> >
> > Compare the readme.io original doc:
> > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/rpm-and-deb-setup
> > with the new version:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> >
> > Is this an oversight or do we have any RPM related issue?
> >
> >
> > 1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the
> >> document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
> >> right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;
> >> 3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
> >> document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
> >> the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
> >> confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external
> links.
> >
> > Yeap, the left-side menu issue was known and we keep fixing it. As for
> the
> > right-side menu issues, that's new. Both issues will be fixed:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13522
> >
> > 2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border
> >> line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
> >> with the document body.
> >
> > Could you point out to any example? We do use a special background and
> > syntax highlighter for code snippets. For instance, check a configuration
> > snippet from this K8 installation section:
> >
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/kubernetes/azure-deployment#creating-service
> >
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/setup-dotnet
> >> this page is 404
> >
> > Good catch. I removed that page and, instead, added a special callout to
> > the top of this page. The callout brings attention to .NET, Python, etc.
> > installation instructions:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/understanding-configuration
> >
> > In addition, with regard to Kubernetes, in fact, the services provided
> >> by various cloud service providers are generally similar. From the
> >> perspective of documents, most of the contents are repetitive. In
> >> addition, many users may still deploy Kubernetes in a private
> environment.
> >> So recombine these long documents into one general document, and then
> >> according to the differences of different service providers, there is
> >> another document to make it look clearer and save a lot of space.
> >
> > Makes sense to me. Create a ticket for that. Hope those other
> contributors
> > will pick it up. Don't have time to work on it personally:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13528
> >
> > Btw, should we create any instructions for Alibaba, Huawei or other
> clouds?
> > Do you have anything like that on the Chinese version of the doc?
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 11:03 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Denis,
> >>
> >> There are several suggestions for improvement:
> >>
> >> 1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the
> >> document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
> >> right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;
> >>
> >> 2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border
> >> line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
> >> with the document body.
> >>
> >> 3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
> >> document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
> >> the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
> >> confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external
> links.
> >>
> >> 在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation
> pages.
> >> We
> >>> didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural
> >> changes
> >>> as well as complete 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[18624049226]

I know that if the content of codeblock(tabs) is a code snippet, it has 
a background color. If it's a markdown text, it's not.
In other words, the background color is the background color of the code 
snippet, not the background color of codeblock.


在 2020/10/6 上午7:31, Denis Magda 写道:

Hey, thanks for keep checking the content and behavior of the new docs.
This helps a lot!

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only
descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the
original one.


Hmm, good remark. @Peter Ivanov , for some reason,
Artem didn't port the RPM instructions.

Compare the readme.io original doc:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/rpm-and-deb-setup
with the new version:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

Is this an oversight or do we have any RPM related issue?


1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the

document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;
3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external links.


Yeap, the left-side menu issue was known and we keep fixing it. As for the
right-side menu issues, that's new. Both issues will be fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13522

2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border

line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
with the document body.


Could you point out to any example? We do use a special background and
syntax highlighter for code snippets. For instance, check a configuration
snippet from this K8 installation section:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/kubernetes/azure-deployment#creating-service

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/setup-dotnet

this page is 404


Good catch. I removed that page and, instead, added a special callout to
the top of this page. The callout brings attention to .NET, Python, etc.
installation instructions:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/understanding-configuration

In addition, with regard to Kubernetes, in fact, the services provided

by various cloud service providers are generally similar. From the
perspective of documents, most of the contents are repetitive. In
addition, many users may still deploy Kubernetes in a private environment.
So recombine these long documents into one general document, and then
according to the differences of different service providers, there is
another document to make it look clearer and save a lot of space.


Makes sense to me. Create a ticket for that. Hope those other contributors
will pick it up. Don't have time to work on it personally:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13528

Btw, should we create any instructions for Alibaba, Huawei or other clouds?
Do you have anything like that on the Chinese version of the doc?



-
Denis


On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 11:03 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:


Hi Denis,

There are several suggestions for improvement:

1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the
document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;

2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border
line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
with the document body.

3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external links.

在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:

Hi,

Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages.

We

didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural

changes

as well as complete rewrites of pages.
Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
legacy or rarely used APIs.

Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox

that

can point out to a new location of certain docs.

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:


Hi Denis,

I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a

hint.

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Hey, thanks for keep checking the content and behavior of the new docs.
This helps a lot!

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only
> descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the
> original one.


Hmm, good remark. @Peter Ivanov , for some reason,
Artem didn't port the RPM instructions.

Compare the readme.io original doc:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/rpm-and-deb-setup
with the new version:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

Is this an oversight or do we have any RPM related issue?


1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the
> document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
> right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;
> 3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
> document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
> the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
> confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external links.


Yeap, the left-side menu issue was known and we keep fixing it. As for the
right-side menu issues, that's new. Both issues will be fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13522

2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border
> line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
> with the document body.


Could you point out to any example? We do use a special background and
syntax highlighter for code snippets. For instance, check a configuration
snippet from this K8 installation section:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/kubernetes/azure-deployment#creating-service

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/setup-dotnet
> this page is 404


Good catch. I removed that page and, instead, added a special callout to
the top of this page. The callout brings attention to .NET, Python, etc.
installation instructions:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/understanding-configuration

In addition, with regard to Kubernetes, in fact, the services provided
> by various cloud service providers are generally similar. From the
> perspective of documents, most of the contents are repetitive. In
> addition, many users may still deploy Kubernetes in a private environment.
> So recombine these long documents into one general document, and then
> according to the differences of different service providers, there is
> another document to make it look clearer and save a lot of space.


Makes sense to me. Create a ticket for that. Hope those other contributors
will pick it up. Don't have time to work on it personally:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13528

Btw, should we create any instructions for Alibaba, Huawei or other clouds?
Do you have anything like that on the Chinese version of the doc?



-
Denis


On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 11:03 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:

> Hi Denis,
>
> There are several suggestions for improvement:
>
> 1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the
> document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
> right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;
>
> 2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border
> line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
> with the document body.
>
> 3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
> document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
> the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
> confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external links.
>
> 在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages.
> We
> > didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural
> changes
> > as well as complete rewrites of pages.
> > Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
> > legacy or rarely used APIs.
> >
> > Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox
> that
> > can point out to a new location of certain docs.
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Denis,
> >>
> >> I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
> >> corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
> >> document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
> >> I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a
> hint.
> >>
> >> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> >
> >
> >>
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment
> >
> > Those are legacy installation options. We agreed 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Igniters, the new docs are released and merged to the ignite master
repository. Below are some further tasks. Use the "new-docs" label to
report any issues related to the new docs. Compare with the list below to
double-check if an issue is already reported:

   - Issues with the left-navigation menu behavior (Mauricio):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13522
   - Issues with the stale content on the website (INFRA):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13483
   - Issues with the automatic creation of a table of content (Mauricio):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13523
   - Jekyll reports warnings during a transformation to HTML (unassigned):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13524
   - Detection of broken links (Mauricio):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13525
   - Document docs contribution and release processes (Denis):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13526
   - Redirect traffic from readme.io (Denis):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13527
   - Creating generic K8 docs (unassigned):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13528
   - OpenShift installation docs (unassigned):
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13529


-
Denis


On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 11:03 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:

> Hi Denis,
>
> There are several suggestions for improvement:
>
> 1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the
> document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the
> right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;
>
> 2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border
> line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused
> with the document body.
>
> 3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the
> document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on
> the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems
> confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external links.
>
> 在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages.
> We
> > didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural
> changes
> > as well as complete rewrites of pages.
> > Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
> > legacy or rarely used APIs.
> >
> > Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox
> that
> > can point out to a new location of certain docs.
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Denis,
> >>
> >> I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
> >> corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
> >> document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
> >> I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a
> hint.
> >>
> >> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
> >
> >
> >>
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment
> >
> > Those are legacy installation options. We agreed not to bring them to the
> > new docs.
> >
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/generic-configuration
> >
> > That generic K8 configuration was referenced from cloud-specific pages.
> > Now, the whole installation process is adopted for every cloud
> environment
> > so that the reader doesn't
> > need to jump back and forth between the generic and cloud-specific K8
> pages.
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-defragmentation
> >
> >
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/memory-architecture#memory-defragmentation
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-locks
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/messaging
> >
> > These two were missed, I'll add them to the new docs.
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/perfomance-benchmarking
> >
> > Same, I'll add it.
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/amazon-aws
> >
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/clustering/discovery-in-the-cloud
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/web-session-clustering
> >
> > The page is outdated. There are many blog posts and articles on the topic
> > on the Internet. We deliberately skipped it.
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/installation-in-apache-karaf
> >
> > The module is not maintained and there are no signs that anybody uses it.
> > No plans to port.
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/ignite-life-cycle
> >
> >
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/starting-nodes#node-lifecycle-events
> >
> >
> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/thread-pools
> >
> >
> 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[18624049226]

Hi Denis,

There are several suggestions for improvement:

1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the 
document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the 
right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good;


2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should have a background color or border 
line (see the original readme.io),Otherwise, it is easy to be confused 
with the document body.


3.Most of the time, the menu on the left side cannot be linked with the 
document body normally. When a document is displayed, the menu item on 
the left side should be expanded and selected. But now the logic seems 
confused, especially when the current page is jumping from external links.


在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:

Hi,

Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We
didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes
as well as complete rewrites of pages.
Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
legacy or rarely used APIs.

Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox that
can point out to a new location of certain docs.

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:


Hi Denis,

I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint.

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm




https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment


Those are legacy installation options. We agreed not to bring them to the
new docs.


https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/generic-configuration


That generic K8 configuration was referenced from cloud-specific pages.
Now, the whole installation process is adopted for every cloud environment
so that the reader doesn't
need to jump back and forth between the generic and cloud-specific K8 pages.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-defragmentation


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/memory-architecture#memory-defragmentation



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-locks
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/messaging


These two were missed, I'll add them to the new docs.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/perfomance-benchmarking


Same, I'll add it.



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/amazon-aws


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/clustering/discovery-in-the-cloud



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/web-session-clustering


The page is outdated. There are many blog posts and articles on the topic
on the Internet. We deliberately skipped it.



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/installation-in-apache-karaf


The module is not maintained and there are no signs that anybody uses it.
No plans to port.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/ignite-life-cycle


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/starting-nodes#node-lifecycle-events



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/thread-pools


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/perf-and-troubleshooting/thread-pools-tuning



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/async-support


This page seems redundant. It should be enough to open JavaDocs and see
sync and async versions of the APIs.

--
Denis



在 2020/10/3 上午4:44, Denis Magda 写道:

Thanks Pavel! Merged.

Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
enhancements.

On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doing any documentation
changes or sending pull-requests until further notice.*

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:50 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 

wrote:

Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
wrote:


Denis,

Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:


You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes

such

as
the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is

some

CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed

soon.

-
Denis


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda 

wrote:

Pavel,

I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor

changes.

The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the

navigation

tree:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest

The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections.

It

all

makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under

the

".NET specific" section while some under 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[18624049226]

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/setup-dotnet

this page is 404

在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:

Hi,

Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We
didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes
as well as complete rewrites of pages.
Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
legacy or rarely used APIs.

Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox that
can point out to a new location of certain docs.

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:


Hi Denis,

I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint.

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm




https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment


Those are legacy installation options. We agreed not to bring them to the
new docs.


https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/generic-configuration


That generic K8 configuration was referenced from cloud-specific pages.
Now, the whole installation process is adopted for every cloud environment
so that the reader doesn't
need to jump back and forth between the generic and cloud-specific K8 pages.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-defragmentation


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/memory-architecture#memory-defragmentation



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-locks
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/messaging


These two were missed, I'll add them to the new docs.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/perfomance-benchmarking


Same, I'll add it.



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/amazon-aws


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/clustering/discovery-in-the-cloud



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/web-session-clustering


The page is outdated. There are many blog posts and articles on the topic
on the Internet. We deliberately skipped it.



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/installation-in-apache-karaf


The module is not maintained and there are no signs that anybody uses it.
No plans to port.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/ignite-life-cycle


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/starting-nodes#node-lifecycle-events



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/thread-pools


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/perf-and-troubleshooting/thread-pools-tuning



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/async-support


This page seems redundant. It should be enough to open JavaDocs and see
sync and async versions of the APIs.

--
Denis



在 2020/10/3 上午4:44, Denis Magda 写道:

Thanks Pavel! Merged.

Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
enhancements.

On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doing any documentation
changes or sending pull-requests until further notice.*

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:50 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 

wrote:

Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
wrote:


Denis,

Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:


You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes

such

as
the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is

some

CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed

soon.

-
Denis


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda 

wrote:

Pavel,

I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor

changes.

The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the

navigation

tree:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest

The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections.

It

all

makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under

the

".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything

later.

As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".


-
Denis


On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda 

wrote:

Pavel,

Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
IGNITE-13331 .

Let's

split the job.

Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.

Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.

-
Denis


On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <

ptupit...@apache.org>

wrote:


Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[18624049226]

Hi Denis,

Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only 
descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the 
original one.


In addition, with regard to Kubernetes, in fact, the services provided 
by various cloud service providers are generally similar. From the 
perspective of documents, most of the contents are repetitive. In 
addition, many users may still deploy Kubernetes in a private environment.
So recombine these long documents into one general document, and then 
according to the differences of different service providers, there is 
another document to make it look clearer and save a lot of space.


在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道:

Hi,

Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We
didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes
as well as complete rewrites of pages.
Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
legacy or rarely used APIs.

Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox that
can point out to a new location of certain docs.

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:


Hi Denis,

I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint.

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm




https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment


Those are legacy installation options. We agreed not to bring them to the
new docs.


https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/generic-configuration


That generic K8 configuration was referenced from cloud-specific pages.
Now, the whole installation process is adopted for every cloud environment
so that the reader doesn't
need to jump back and forth between the generic and cloud-specific K8 pages.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-defragmentation


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/memory-architecture#memory-defragmentation



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-locks
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/messaging


These two were missed, I'll add them to the new docs.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/perfomance-benchmarking


Same, I'll add it.



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/amazon-aws


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/clustering/discovery-in-the-cloud



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/web-session-clustering


The page is outdated. There are many blog posts and articles on the topic
on the Internet. We deliberately skipped it.



https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/installation-in-apache-karaf


The module is not maintained and there are no signs that anybody uses it.
No plans to port.



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/ignite-life-cycle


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/starting-nodes#node-lifecycle-events



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/thread-pools


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/perf-and-troubleshooting/thread-pools-tuning



https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/async-support


This page seems redundant. It should be enough to open JavaDocs and see
sync and async versions of the APIs.

--
Denis



在 2020/10/3 上午4:44, Denis Magda 写道:

Thanks Pavel! Merged.

Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
enhancements.

On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doing any documentation
changes or sending pull-requests until further notice.*

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:50 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 

wrote:

Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
wrote:


Denis,

Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:


You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes

such

as
the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is

some

CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed

soon.

-
Denis


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda 

wrote:

Pavel,

I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor

changes.

The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the

navigation

tree:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest

The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections.

It

all

makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under

the

".NET 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Hi,

Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We
didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes
as well as complete rewrites of pages.
Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
legacy or rarely used APIs.

Please see inline for extra thoughts. Btw, try out the search toolbox that
can point out to a new location of certain docs.

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:05 PM 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com> wrote:

> Hi Denis,
>
> I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
> corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
> document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
> I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint.
>
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm


>
>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment


Those are legacy installation options. We agreed not to bring them to the
new docs.

>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/generic-configuration


That generic K8 configuration was referenced from cloud-specific pages.
Now, the whole installation process is adopted for every cloud environment
so that the reader doesn't
need to jump back and forth between the generic and cloud-specific K8 pages.


>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-defragmentation


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/memory-architecture#memory-defragmentation


>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-locks
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/messaging


These two were missed, I'll add them to the new docs.


> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/perfomance-benchmarking


Same, I'll add it.


> https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/amazon-aws


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/clustering/discovery-in-the-cloud


>
> https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/web-session-clustering


The page is outdated. There are many blog posts and articles on the topic
on the Internet. We deliberately skipped it.


>
> https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/installation-in-apache-karaf


The module is not maintained and there are no signs that anybody uses it.
No plans to port.


>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/ignite-life-cycle


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/starting-nodes#node-lifecycle-events


>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/thread-pools


https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/perf-and-troubleshooting/thread-pools-tuning


>
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/async-support


This page seems redundant. It should be enough to open JavaDocs and see
sync and async versions of the APIs.

--
Denis


>
> 在 2020/10/3 上午4:44, Denis Magda 写道:
> > Thanks Pavel! Merged.
> >
> > Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
> > new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
> > enhancements.
> >
> > On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
> > feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doing any documentation
> > changes or sending pull-requests until further notice.*
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:50 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Denis,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
> >>> I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
> >>>
>  You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes
> such
>  as
>  the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is
> >> some
>  CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed
> >> soon.
>  -
>  Denis
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda 
> wrote:
> 
> > Pavel,
> >
> > I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor
> >> changes.
> > The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the
>  navigation
> > tree:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest
> >
> > The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections.
> It
>  all
> > makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under
>  the
> > ".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
> > technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything
> >> later.
> > As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".
> >
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda 
> >> wrote:
> >> Pavel,
> >>
> >> Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
> >> 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[18624049226]

Hi Denis,

I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The 
corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the 
document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.

I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint.

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm

https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/mesos-deployment
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/yarn-deployment
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/generic-configuration
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-defragmentation
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-locks
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/messaging
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/perfomance-benchmarking
https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/amazon-aws
https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/web-session-clustering
https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/installation-in-apache-karaf
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/ignite-life-cycle
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/thread-pools
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/async-support

在 2020/10/3 上午4:44, Denis Magda 写道:

Thanks Pavel! Merged.

Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
enhancements.

On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doing any documentation
changes or sending pull-requests until further notice.*

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:50 AM Pavel Tupitsyn  wrote:


Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
wrote:


Denis,

Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:


You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such
as
the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is

some

CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed

soon.

-
Denis


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda  wrote:


Pavel,

I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor

changes.

The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the

navigation

tree:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest

The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It

all

makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under

the

".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything

later.

As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".


-
Denis


On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda 

wrote:

Pavel,

Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
IGNITE-13331 .

Let's

split the job.

Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.

Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.

-
Denis


On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <

ptupit...@apache.org>

wrote:


Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it

yourself?

I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)


Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?

Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them

with

modern equivalents later.

[1]



https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda 

wrote:

Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you

want

me

to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?

Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying

the

.NET

community no longer uses those?

-
Denis


On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <

ptupit...@apache.org>

wrote:


Denis,


@Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to

document

the

features added in 2.9  <

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331

Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I

postponed

the task as well.



is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?

A list of missing things:
- Standalone nodes [1]
- Java detection, known issues [2]
- XML configuration [3]
- Serialization details [4]
- Platform interop [5]
- Deployment [6]
- Troubleshooting [7]
- Assembly loading [8]
- LINQ [9]
- Calling Java services [10]
- Plugins [11]
- Logging [12]

Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so

we

can

skip that.

[1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
[2]

https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support

[3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
[4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
[5]

https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability

[6] 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Thanks Pavel! Merged.

Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
enhancements.

On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doing any documentation
changes or sending pull-requests until further notice.*

-
Denis


On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:50 AM Pavel Tupitsyn  wrote:

> Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> wrote:
>
> > Denis,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
> > I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
> >
> >> You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such
> >> as
> >> the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is
> some
> >> CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed
> soon.
> >>
> >> -
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Pavel,
> >> >
> >> > I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor
> changes.
> >> > The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the
> >> navigation
> >> > tree:
> >> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest
> >> >
> >> > The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It
> >> all
> >> > makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under
> >> the
> >> > ".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
> >> > technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything
> later.
> >> > As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > Denis
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Pavel,
> >> >>
> >> >> Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
> >> >> IGNITE-13331 .
> >> Let's
> >> >> split the job.
> >> >>
> >> >> Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.
> >> >>
> >> >> -
> >> >> Denis
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <
> ptupit...@apache.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> > Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it
> >> yourself?
> >> >>> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
> >> >>> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
> >> >>> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them
> >> with
> >> >>> modern equivalents later.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1]
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda 
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you
> >> want
> >> >>> me
> >> >>> > to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying
> >> the
> >> >>> .NET
> >> >>> > community no longer uses those?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > -
> >> >>> > Denis
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >> ptupit...@apache.org>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > > Denis,
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to
> >> >>> document
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > > features added in 2.9  <
> >> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
> >> >>> > postponed
> >> >>> > > the task as well.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > A list of missing things:
> >> >>> > > - Standalone nodes [1]
> >> >>> > > - Java detection, known issues [2]
> >> >>> > > - XML configuration [3]
> >> >>> > > - Serialization details [4]
> >> >>> > > - Platform interop [5]
> >> >>> > > - Deployment [6]
> >> >>> > > - Troubleshooting [7]
> >> >>> > > - Assembly loading [8]
> >> >>> > > - LINQ [9]
> >> >>> > > - Calling Java services [10]
> >> >>> > > - Plugins [11]
> >> >>> > > - Logging [12]
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so
> we
> >> >>> can
> >> >>> > > skip that.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
> >> >>> > > [2]
> >> https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
> >> >>> > > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
> >> >>> > > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
> >> >>> > > [5]
> >> >>> 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Pavel Tupitsyn]

Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn  wrote:

> Denis,
>
> Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
> I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
>
>> You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such
>> as
>> the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is some
>> CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed soon.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
>>
>> > Pavel,
>> >
>> > I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor changes.
>> > The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the
>> navigation
>> > tree:
>> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest
>> >
>> > The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It
>> all
>> > makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under
>> the
>> > ".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
>> > technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything later.
>> > As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".
>> >
>> >
>> > -
>> > Denis
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Pavel,
>> >>
>> >> Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
>> >> IGNITE-13331 .
>> Let's
>> >> split the job.
>> >>
>> >> Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> Denis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> > Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it
>> yourself?
>> >>> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
>> >>>
>> >>> > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
>> >>> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
>> >>> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them
>> with
>> >>> modern equivalents later.
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you
>> want
>> >>> me
>> >>> > to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying
>> the
>> >>> .NET
>> >>> > community no longer uses those?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -
>> >>> > Denis
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> ptupit...@apache.org>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > Denis,
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to
>> >>> document
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > > features added in 2.9  <
>> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
>> >>> > postponed
>> >>> > > the task as well.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > A list of missing things:
>> >>> > > - Standalone nodes [1]
>> >>> > > - Java detection, known issues [2]
>> >>> > > - XML configuration [3]
>> >>> > > - Serialization details [4]
>> >>> > > - Platform interop [5]
>> >>> > > - Deployment [6]
>> >>> > > - Troubleshooting [7]
>> >>> > > - Assembly loading [8]
>> >>> > > - LINQ [9]
>> >>> > > - Calling Java services [10]
>> >>> > > - Plugins [11]
>> >>> > > - Logging [12]
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we
>> >>> can
>> >>> > > skip that.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
>> >>> > > [2]
>> https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
>> >>> > > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
>> >>> > > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
>> >>> > > [5]
>> >>> https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
>> >>> > > [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
>> >>> > > [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
>> >>> > > [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
>> >>> > > [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
>> >>> > > [10]
>> https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
>> >>> > > [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
>> >>> > > [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky <
>> >>> ivanda...@gmail.com>
>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux
>> >>> and Mac
>> >>> > > OS
>> >>> > > > X and 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Pavel Tupitsyn]

Denis,

Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda  wrote:

> You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such as
> the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is some
> CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed soon.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
>
> > Pavel,
> >
> > I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor changes.
> > The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the navigation
> > tree:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest
> >
> > The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It
> all
> > makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under the
> > ".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
> > technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything later.
> > As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".
> >
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
> >
> >> Pavel,
> >>
> >> Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
> >> IGNITE-13331 .
> Let's
> >> split the job.
> >>
> >> Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.
> >>
> >> Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.
> >>
> >> -
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> > Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it
> yourself?
> >>> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
> >>>
> >>> > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
> >>> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
> >>> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them
> with
> >>> modern equivalents later.
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you
> want
> >>> me
> >>> > to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
> >>> >
> >>> > Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the
> >>> .NET
> >>> > community no longer uses those?
> >>> >
> >>> > -
> >>> > Denis
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn  >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Denis,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to
> >>> document
> >>> > the
> >>> > > features added in 2.9  <
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
> >>> > postponed
> >>> > > the task as well.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > A list of missing things:
> >>> > > - Standalone nodes [1]
> >>> > > - Java detection, known issues [2]
> >>> > > - XML configuration [3]
> >>> > > - Serialization details [4]
> >>> > > - Platform interop [5]
> >>> > > - Deployment [6]
> >>> > > - Troubleshooting [7]
> >>> > > - Assembly loading [8]
> >>> > > - LINQ [9]
> >>> > > - Calling Java services [10]
> >>> > > - Plugins [11]
> >>> > > - Logging [12]
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we
> >>> can
> >>> > > skip that.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
> >>> > > [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
> >>> > > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
> >>> > > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
> >>> > > [5]
> >>> https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
> >>> > > [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
> >>> > > [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
> >>> > > [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
> >>> > > [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
> >>> > > [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
> >>> > > [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
> >>> > > [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky <
> >>> ivanda...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux
> >>> and Mac
> >>> > > OS
> >>> > > > X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it.
> >>> (CMake
> >>> > > for
> >>> > > > windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
> >>> > > > I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be
> >>> available
> >>> > > > soon.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
> >>> > > >
> >>> 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such as
the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is some
CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed soon.

-
Denis


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda  wrote:

> Pavel,
>
> I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor changes.
> The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the navigation
> tree:
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest
>
> The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It all
> makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under the
> ".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
> technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything later.
> As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".
>
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
>
>> Pavel,
>>
>> Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
>> IGNITE-13331 . Let's
>> split the job.
>>
>> Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.
>>
>> Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>>> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
>>>
>>> > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
>>> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
>>> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them with
>>> modern equivalents later.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
>>>
>>> > Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want
>>> me
>>> > to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>>> >
>>> > Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the
>>> .NET
>>> > community no longer uses those?
>>> >
>>> > -
>>> > Denis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Denis,
>>> > >
>>> > > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to
>>> document
>>> > the
>>> > > features added in 2.9  <
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
>>> > postponed
>>> > > the task as well.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>>> > >
>>> > > A list of missing things:
>>> > > - Standalone nodes [1]
>>> > > - Java detection, known issues [2]
>>> > > - XML configuration [3]
>>> > > - Serialization details [4]
>>> > > - Platform interop [5]
>>> > > - Deployment [6]
>>> > > - Troubleshooting [7]
>>> > > - Assembly loading [8]
>>> > > - LINQ [9]
>>> > > - Calling Java services [10]
>>> > > - Plugins [11]
>>> > > - Logging [12]
>>> > >
>>> > > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we
>>> can
>>> > > skip that.
>>> > >
>>> > > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
>>> > > [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
>>> > > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
>>> > > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
>>> > > [5]
>>> https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
>>> > > [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
>>> > > [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
>>> > > [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
>>> > > [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
>>> > > [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
>>> > > [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
>>> > > [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky <
>>> ivanda...@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux
>>> and Mac
>>> > > OS
>>> > > > X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it.
>>> (CMake
>>> > > for
>>> > > > windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
>>> > > > I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be
>>> available
>>> > > > soon.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
>>> > > >
>>> > > > пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov >> >:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hello, Denis.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document
>>> the
>>> > > new
>>> > > > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Yes.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda 
>>> > > написал(а):
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Folks,
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > While 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Pavel,

I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor changes. The
docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the navigation tree:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest

The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It all
makes things look a bit clumsy for now (that some .NET docs are under the
".NET specific" section while some under "Thin Clients) but I'll let
technical-writing contributors review and restructure everything later.
As for the IGNITE-13331, put the changes under the "Thin Clients".


-
Denis


On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:49 PM Denis Magda  wrote:

> Pavel,
>
> Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
> IGNITE-13331 . Let's
> split the job.
>
> Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.
>
> Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> wrote:
>
>> > Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
>>
>> > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
>> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
>> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them with
>> modern equivalents later.
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
>>
>> > Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want
>> me
>> > to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>> >
>> > Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the
>> .NET
>> > community no longer uses those?
>> >
>> > -
>> > Denis
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Denis,
>> > >
>> > > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to
>> document
>> > the
>> > > features added in 2.9  <
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
>> > postponed
>> > > the task as well.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>> > >
>> > > A list of missing things:
>> > > - Standalone nodes [1]
>> > > - Java detection, known issues [2]
>> > > - XML configuration [3]
>> > > - Serialization details [4]
>> > > - Platform interop [5]
>> > > - Deployment [6]
>> > > - Troubleshooting [7]
>> > > - Assembly loading [8]
>> > > - LINQ [9]
>> > > - Calling Java services [10]
>> > > - Plugins [11]
>> > > - Logging [12]
>> > >
>> > > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we can
>> > > skip that.
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
>> > > [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
>> > > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
>> > > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
>> > > [5] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
>> > > [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
>> > > [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
>> > > [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
>> > > [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
>> > > [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
>> > > [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
>> > > [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and
>> Mac
>> > > OS
>> > > > X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it.
>> (CMake
>> > > for
>> > > > windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
>> > > > I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be
>> available
>> > > > soon.
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
>> > > >
>> > > > пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov > >:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello, Denis.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document
>> the
>> > > new
>> > > > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yes.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda 
>> > > написал(а):
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Folks,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new
>> > docs
>> > > > > project to the finish line:
>> > > > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to
>> the
>> > new
>> > > > > engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle
>> > down
>> > > > with
>> > > > > the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will
>> be
>> > > ready
>> > > > > by the 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Pavel,

Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of
IGNITE-13331 . Let's
split the job.

Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week.

Thanks, folks, for the cooperation.

-
Denis


On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19 PM Pavel Tupitsyn 
wrote:

> > Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
>
> > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them with
> modern equivalents later.
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
>
> > Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want me
> > to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
> >
> > Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the
> .NET
> > community no longer uses those?
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Denis,
> > >
> > > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to document
> > the
> > > features added in 2.9  <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
> > postponed
> > > the task as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> > >
> > > A list of missing things:
> > > - Standalone nodes [1]
> > > - Java detection, known issues [2]
> > > - XML configuration [3]
> > > - Serialization details [4]
> > > - Platform interop [5]
> > > - Deployment [6]
> > > - Troubleshooting [7]
> > > - Assembly loading [8]
> > > - LINQ [9]
> > > - Calling Java services [10]
> > > - Plugins [11]
> > > - Logging [12]
> > >
> > > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we can
> > > skip that.
> > >
> > > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
> > > [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
> > > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
> > > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
> > > [5] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
> > > [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
> > > [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
> > > [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
> > > [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
> > > [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
> > > [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
> > > [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and
> Mac
> > > OS
> > > > X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it.
> (CMake
> > > for
> > > > windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
> > > > I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be
> available
> > > > soon.
> > > >
> > > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
> > > >
> > > > пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov :
> > > >
> > > > > Hello, Denis.
> > > > >
> > > > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document
> the
> > > new
> > > > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda 
> > > написал(а):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new
> > docs
> > > > > project to the finish line:
> > > > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the
> > new
> > > > > engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle
> > down
> > > > with
> > > > > the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be
> > > ready
> > > > > by the time of the 2.9 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But there are some items that need the involvement of some of
> you:
> > > > > >   • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working
> on
> > > > some
> > > > > .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added
> in
> > > 2.9
> > > > > and is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> > > > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document
> the
> > > new
> > > > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved
> from
> > > > > readme.io, I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and
> > > > > ignite-2.9 branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > Denis
> > > 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Nikolay Izhikov]

Hello, Igniters.

I’ve prepared two PR for new docs:


https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8279 - JOBS system view description.

https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8280 - KILL commands description.

Please, review.

> 25 сент. 2020 г., в 09:19, Pavel Tupitsyn  написал(а):
> 
>> Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
> I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)
> 
>> Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
> Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
> We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them with
> modern equivalents later.
> 
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
> 
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda  wrote:
> 
>> Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want me
>> to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>> 
>> Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the .NET
>> community no longer uses those?
>> 
>> -
>> Denis
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Denis,
>>> 
 @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to document
>> the
>>> features added in 2.9  <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
 
>>> 
>>> Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
>> postponed
>>> the task as well.
>>> 
>>> 
 is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>>> 
>>> A list of missing things:
>>> - Standalone nodes [1]
>>> - Java detection, known issues [2]
>>> - XML configuration [3]
>>> - Serialization details [4]
>>> - Platform interop [5]
>>> - Deployment [6]
>>> - Troubleshooting [7]
>>> - Assembly loading [8]
>>> - LINQ [9]
>>> - Calling Java services [10]
>>> - Plugins [11]
>>> - Logging [12]
>>> 
>>> Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we can
>>> skip that.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
>>> [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
>>> [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
>>> [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
>>> [5] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
>>> [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
>>> [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
>>> [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
>>> [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
>>> [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
>>> [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
>>> [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and Mac
>>> OS
 X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it. (CMake
>>> for
 windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
 I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be available
 soon.
 
 [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
 
 пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov :
 
> Hello, Denis.
> 
>>  • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the
>>> new
> management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda 
>>> написал(а):
>> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new
>> docs
> project to the finish line:
 https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
>> 
>> Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the
>> new
> engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle
>> down
 with
> the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be
>>> ready
> by the time of the 2.9 release.
>> 
>> But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:
>>  • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working on
 some
> .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added in
>>> 2.9
> and is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>>  • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the
>>> new
> management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
>> 
>> Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from
> readme.io, I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and
> ignite-2.9 branch.
>> 
>> -
>> Denis
> 
> 
 
 --
 Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Pavel Tupitsyn]

> Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :)

> Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those?
Existing integrations are for legacy technologies.
We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hopefully, replace them with
modern equivalents later.

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:20 AM Denis Magda  wrote:

> Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want me
> to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?
>
> Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the .NET
> community no longer uses those?
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn 
> wrote:
>
> > Denis,
> >
> > > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to document
> the
> > features added in 2.9  <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I
> postponed
> > the task as well.
> >
> >
> > > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> >
> > A list of missing things:
> > - Standalone nodes [1]
> > - Java detection, known issues [2]
> > - XML configuration [3]
> > - Serialization details [4]
> > - Platform interop [5]
> > - Deployment [6]
> > - Troubleshooting [7]
> > - Assembly loading [8]
> > - LINQ [9]
> > - Calling Java services [10]
> > - Plugins [11]
> > - Logging [12]
> >
> > Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we can
> > skip that.
> >
> > [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
> > [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
> > [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
> > [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
> > [5] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
> > [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
> > [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
> > [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
> > [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
> > [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
> > [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
> > [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and Mac
> > OS
> > > X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it. (CMake
> > for
> > > windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
> > > I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be available
> > > soon.
> > >
> > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
> > >
> > > пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov :
> > >
> > > > Hello, Denis.
> > > >
> > > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the
> > new
> > > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda 
> > написал(а):
> > > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new
> docs
> > > > project to the finish line:
> > > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
> > > > >
> > > > > Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the
> new
> > > > engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle
> down
> > > with
> > > > the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be
> > ready
> > > > by the time of the 2.9 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:
> > > > >   • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working on
> > > some
> > > > .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added in
> > 2.9
> > > > and is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> > > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the
> > new
> > > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from
> > > > readme.io, I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and
> > > > ignite-2.9 branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > Denis
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > >
> >
>

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want me
to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself?

Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the .NET
community no longer uses those?

-
Denis


On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn  wrote:

> Denis,
>
> > @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to document the
> features added in 2.9   >
>
> Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I postponed
> the task as well.
>
>
> > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>
> A list of missing things:
> - Standalone nodes [1]
> - Java detection, known issues [2]
> - XML configuration [3]
> - Serialization details [4]
> - Platform interop [5]
> - Deployment [6]
> - Troubleshooting [7]
> - Assembly loading [8]
> - LINQ [9]
> - Calling Java services [10]
> - Plugins [11]
> - Logging [12]
>
> Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we can
> skip that.
>
> [1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
> [2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
> [3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
> [4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
> [5] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
> [6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
> [7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
> [8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
> [9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
> [10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
> [11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
> [12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and Mac
> OS
> > X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it. (CMake
> for
> > windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
> > I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be available
> > soon.
> >
> > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
> >
> > пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov :
> >
> > > Hello, Denis.
> > >
> > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the
> new
> > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda 
> написал(а):
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs
> > > project to the finish line:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
> > > >
> > > > Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the new
> > > engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle down
> > with
> > > the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be
> ready
> > > by the time of the 2.9 release.
> > > >
> > > > But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:
> > > >   • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working on
> > some
> > > .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added in
> 2.9
> > > and is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> > > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the
> new
> > > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > > >
> > > > Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from
> > > readme.io, I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and
> > > ignite-2.9 branch.
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Denis
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> >
>

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Pavel Tupitsyn]

Denis,

> @Pavel Tupitsyn  ... Are you going to document the
features added in 2.9  

Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I postponed
the task as well.


> is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?

A list of missing things:
- Standalone nodes [1]
- Java detection, known issues [2]
- XML configuration [3]
- Serialization details [4]
- Platform interop [5]
- Deployment [6]
- Troubleshooting [7]
- Assembly loading [8]
- LINQ [9]
- Calling Java services [10]
- Plugins [11]
- Logging [12]

Also "Third-party integrations", but I consider them legacy, so we can
skip that.

[1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/standalone-nodes
[2] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/cross-platform-support
[3] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/configuration
[4] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/serialization
[5] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/platform-interoperability
[6] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/deployment
[7] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/troubleshooting
[8] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/zero-deployment
[9] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/sql-database
[10] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/calling-java-services
[11] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/plugins
[12] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/logging

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ivan Daschinsky 
wrote:

> Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and Mac OS
> X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it. (CMake for
> windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
> I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be available
> soon.
>
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459
>
> пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov :
>
> > Hello, Denis.
> >
> > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new
> > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda  написал(а):
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs
> > project to the finish line:
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
> > >
> > > Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the new
> > engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle down
> with
> > the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be ready
> > by the time of the 2.9 release.
> > >
> > > But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:
> > >   • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working on
> some
> > .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added in 2.9
> > and is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> > >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new
> > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> > >
> > > Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from
> > readme.io, I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and
> > ignite-2.9 branch.
> > >
> > > -
> > > Denis
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Ivan Daschinsky]

Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and Mac OS
X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it. (CMake for
windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10)
I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be available
soon.

[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13459

пт, 18 сент. 2020 г. в 09:59, Nikolay Izhikov :

> Hello, Denis.
>
> >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new
> management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
>
> Yes.
>
> > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda  написал(а):
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs
> project to the finish line: https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
> >
> > Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the new
> engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle down with
> the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be ready
> by the time of the 2.9 release.
> >
> > But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:
> >   • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working on some
> .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added in 2.9
> and is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
> >   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new
> management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer.
> >
> > Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from
> readme.io, I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and
> ignite-2.9 branch.
> >
> > -
> > Denis
>
>

-- 
Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Nikolay Izhikov]

Hello, Denis.

>   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new 
> management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer. 

Yes.

> 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda  написал(а):
> 
> Folks, 
> 
> While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs project 
> to the finish line: https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface
> 
> Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the new engine, 
> document the release and contribution process, and settle down with the 
> search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be ready by the 
> time of the 2.9 release.
> 
> But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:
>   • @Pavel Tupitsyn, I heard from Artem that you are working on some 
> .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the features added in 2.9 and 
> is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
>   • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new 
> management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer. 
> 
> Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from readme.io, 
> I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and ignite-2.9 branch.
> 
> -
> Denis

New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

[Denis Magda]

Folks,

While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs
project to the finish line: https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface

Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the new
engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle down with
the search plug-in throughout the next week or so. The docs will be ready
by the time of the 2.9 release.

But there are some items that need the involvement of some of you:

   - @Pavel Tupitsyn , I heard from Artem that you
   are working on some .NET-specific tasks. Are you going to document the
   features added in 2.9
   and is there is
   anything else you planned to move from readme.io?
   - @Nikolay Izhikov , is there any chance you can
   document the new management
   commands
    the next week? Use
   me as a reviewer.


Once, all the features are documented and old pages are moved from readme.io,
I'll go ahead and merge the new docs to the master and ignite-2.9 branch.

-
Denis