Re: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes
Hi Wei, Thanks for your contribution. I will ask the PMC to create a new repo. (Then you may need to maintain the github action, and jenkins if needed) Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 刘威 于2022年5月16日周一 22:32写道： > Hi, I'm the original author of IoTDB-SkyWalking plugin. > I have voted to apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage in my last mail. > > Now, let me introduce the current situation of the plugin. > > The plugin now support SkyWalking v8.9.0, v8.9.1 and v9.0.0 with passing > all e2e tests. > I wrote a blog to introduce its design in v8.9.0. You could read it at the > link > > https://skywalking.apache.org/blog/2021-11-23-design-of-iotdb-storage-option/ > . > In v9.0.0, it has been refactored and optimized according to the > DataConverter > in the new design of SkyWalking storage, which could refer to PR#8755 in > SkyWalking repo. > > What's more, I wrote another blog about how to apply IoTDB as backend > storage. You could see the link > > https://skywalking.apache.org/blog/2021-12-08-application-guide-of-iotdb-storage-option/ > . > > In this case, considering its low maintenance frequency and its small > scope of influence, > I think it's more appropriate to move it to a separate repository. > > Thanks for the support of two mentors (@Xiangdong Huang and @Sheng Wu) and > all other contributors. > IoTDB-SkyWalking plugin is a meaningful attempt. > > -- > Wei Liu > School of Computer Science, NPU > > 刘威 > 西北工业大学计算机学院
Re: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes
+1 for apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage — Jialin Qiao Apache IoTDB PMC HW-Chao Wang <576749...@qq.com.invalid> 于2022年5月13日周五 21:09写道： > thanks Skywalking community. i feel should be > apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage.skywalking be not a required module for > iotdb，separate from apache/iotdb. > > > > ---Original--- > From: "Xiangdong Huang" Date: Fri, May 13, 2022 17:37 PM > To: "dev" Subject: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes > > > Hi all, > > Skywalking community is discussing about only keeping self-implemented > storage layer. > > IMO, I think it is not a bad decision to remove 3rd-part implementataion > from skywalking's main repo. Because we can decide which version of > skywalking we can maintain according to the community developers' time. > However, IoTDB-skywalking integration has its meaning and we should keep to > maintain the integration. > > The discussion is, where to put the integration to? > > a new code repo like: apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage? > or into IoTDB's repo like apache/iotdb/skywalking? > > [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059 > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院
Re: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes
thanks Skywalking community. i feel should be apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage.skywalking be not a required module for iotdb，separate from apache/iotdb. ---Original--- From: "Xiangdong Huang"https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059 Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院
