[VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the following small KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group offsets to downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. Currently, we rely on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and kafka-consumer-groups command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality into MM2 itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback workloads between clusters. Thanks for the votes! Ryanne
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the following > small KIP: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group offsets to > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. Currently, we rely > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and kafka-consumer-groups > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality into MM2 > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback workloads between > clusters. > > Thanks for the votes! > > Ryanne >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the following > > small KIP: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group offsets to > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. Currently, we rely > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and kafka-consumer-groups > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality into MM2 > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback workloads between > > clusters. > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > Ryanne > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang wrote: > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan > wrote: > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the > following > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group offsets to > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. Currently, we > rely > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > kafka-consumer-groups > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality into MM2 > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback workloads > between > > > clusters. > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang wrote: > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the > > following > > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group offsets to > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. Currently, we > > rely > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality into MM2 > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback workloads > > between > > > > clusters. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (non-binding) On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" wrote: +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang wrote: > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the > > following > > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group offsets to > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. Currently, we > > rely > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality into MM2 > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback workloads > > between > > > > clusters. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" wrote: > > +1 (binding) > Thanks for the KIP! > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > wrote: > > > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang > wrote: > > > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > the > > > following > > > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > offsets to > > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > Currently, we > > > rely > > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > into MM2 > > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > workloads > > > between > > > > > clusters. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. Ryanne On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > > wrote: > > > > > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > > the > > > > following > > > > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > > offsets to > > > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > Currently, we > > > > rely > > > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > > into MM2 > > > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > > workloads > > > > between > > > > > > clusters. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (non-binding) Navinder On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan wrote: Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. Ryanne On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > > wrote: > > > > > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > > the > > > > following > > > > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > > offsets to > > > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > Currently, we > > > > rely > > > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > > into MM2 > > > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > > workloads > > > > between > > > > > > clusters. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang wrote: > Hello committers, > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > Thank you > > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > thanks for the KIP ! > > > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar .invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > Navinder > > > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > > >Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > > > ning2008w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in > "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? > right? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the > vote for > > > > > the > > > > >> > following > > > > >> > > > small KIP: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer > group > > > > > offsets to > > > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > > > > Currently, we > > > > >> > rely > > > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this > functionality > > > > > into MM2 > > > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to > failover/failback > > > > > workloads > > > > >> > between > > > > >> > > > clusters. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang > wrote: > > > Hello committers, > > > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > Thank you > > > > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > thanks for the KIP ! > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Navinder > > > > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < > mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > > > >Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > > > > ning2008w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in > > "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? > > right? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the > > vote for > > > > > > the > > > > > >> > following > > > > > >> > > > small KIP: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer > > group > > > > > > offsets to > > > > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use > cases. > > > > > > Currently, we > > > > > >> > rely > > > > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this > > functionality > > > > > > into MM2 > > > > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to > > failover/failback > > > > > > workloads > > > > > >> > between > > > > > >> > > > clusters. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan > wrote: > >> Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang >> wrote: >> >> > Hello committers, >> > >> > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the >> > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the >> > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. >> > >> > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 >> > >> > Thank you >> > >> > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar wrote: >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > thanks for the KIP ! >> > > >> > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar > > .invalid> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > > Navinder >> > > > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < >> > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. >> > > > >> > > > Ryanne >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < >> > > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < >> mickael.mai...@gmail.com> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >+1 (binding) >> > > > > >Thanks for the KIP! >> > > > > > >> > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < >> > ryannedo...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < >> > > > ning2008w...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in >> > "MirrorCheckpointTask" >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? >> > right? >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < >> > > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> >> > > > > >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the >> > vote for >> > > > > > the >> > > > > >> > following >> > > > > >> > > > small KIP: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write >> consumer >> > group >> > > > > > offsets to >> > > > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use >> cases. >> > > > > > Currently, we >> > > > > >> > rely >> > > > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and >> > > > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups >> > > > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this >> > functionality >> > > > > > into MM2 >> > > > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to >> > failover/failback >> > > > > > workloads >> > > > > >> > between >> > > > > >> > > > clusters. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Ryanne >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada wrote: > Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I > was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and > offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada > > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan > > wrote: > > > >> Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hello committers, > >> > > >> > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > >> > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > >> > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > >> > > >> > Thank you > >> > > >> > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar wrote: > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > thanks for the KIP ! > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar < > navinder_b...@yahoo.com > >> > .invalid> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > Navinder > >> > > > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > >> > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > >> > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > >> > > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < > >> mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >+1 (binding) > >> > > > > >Thanks for the KIP! > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < > >> > ryannedo...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > >> > > > ning2008w...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in > >> > "MirrorCheckpointTask" > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai < > snow4yo...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? > >> > right? > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > >> > > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the > >> > vote for > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > >> > following > >> > > > > >> > > > small KIP: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write > >> consumer > >> > group > >> > > > > > offsets to > >> > > > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use > >> cases. > >> > > > > > Currently, we > >> > > > > >> > rely > >> > > > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > >> > > > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups > >> > > > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this > >> > functionality > >> > > > > > into MM2 > >> > > > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to > >> > failover/failback > >> > > > > > workloads > >> > > > > >> > between > >> > > > > >> > > > clusters. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (binding). Good addition to MM 2. -Harsha On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM, Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding). > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ gmail. > com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > >> >> >> Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I >> was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and >> offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ gmail. >> com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan < ryannedolan@ gmail. com ( >>> ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: >>> >>> Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang < ning2008wisc@ gmail. com ( ning2008w...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > Hello committers, > > > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > > >>> >>> >> >> >> >> https:/ / cwiki. apache. org/ confluence/ display/ KAFKA/ >> KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2. >> 0 ( >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 >> ) >> >> >>> > > > Thank you > > > > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar < edoardlists@ gmail. com ( > edoardli...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > >> >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> thanks for the KIP ! >> >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar < >> >> > > >>> >>> >> >> >> >> navinder_brar@ yahoo. com ( navinder_b...@yahoo.com ) >> >> >>> > > > .invalid> > > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> Navinder >>> On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < >>> ryannedolan@ >>> gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ryanne >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley < tbentley@ redhat. com ( >>> tbent...@redhat.com ) > >>> >>> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >>> +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < andrew_schofield@ live. com ( andrew_schofi...@live.com ) > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < > > >>> >>> >> >> > > mickael. maison@ gmail. com ( mickael.mai...@gmail.com ) > > >> >>> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > >>> >>> >> >> > > > > ryannedolan@ gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > > >> >>> > > > wrote: > > >> >> >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < >> >> > > >>> >>> >>> >>> ning2008wisc@ gmail. com ( ning2008w...@gmail.com ) >>> >>> > > > wrote: > > >> >>> >>> >>> My current plan is to implement this in >>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >>> >> >> > > > > "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > >> >>> > >> >>> >>> >>> On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai < >>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >>> >> >> >> >> snow4young@ gmail. com ( snow4yo...@gmail.com ) >> >> >>> > >> >>> >>> >>> wrote: >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Thanks for the KIP, Ryanne! It looks like a good feature to me, and the KIP looks well motivated and well designed. I’m +1 (binding) -John On Thu, May 21, 2020, at 10:49, Harsha Ch wrote: > +1 (binding). Good addition to MM 2. > > -Harsha > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM, Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding). > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ gmail. > > com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > >> > >> > >> Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I > >> was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and > >> offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ gmail. > >> com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > >> > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan < ryannedolan@ gmail. com ( > >>> ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > >>> > >>> > > > Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang < ning2008wisc@ gmail. com ( > ning2008w...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello committers, > > > > > > > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> https:/ / cwiki. apache. org/ confluence/ display/ KAFKA/ > >> KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2. > >> 0 ( > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > >> ) > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar < edoardlists@ gmail. com ( > > edoardli...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > >> > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> thanks for the KIP ! > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar < > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> navinder_brar@ yahoo. com ( navinder_b...@yahoo.com ) > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > .invalid> > > > > > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> Navinder > >>> On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > >>> ryannedolan@ > >>> gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Ryanne > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley < tbentley@ redhat. com ( > >>> tbent...@redhat.com ) > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > >>> > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < andrew_schofield@ > live. > com ( andrew_schofi...@live.com ) > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < > > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > mickael. maison@ gmail. com ( mickael.mai...@gmail.com ) > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > ryannedolan@ gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > >> > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ning2008wisc@ gmail. com ( ning2008w...@gmail.com ) > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > wrote: > >>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Thanks for the clear well written KIP. This seems like a useful feature to me. +1(binding) -Bill On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:50 PM John Roesler wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Ryanne! > > It looks like a good feature to me, and the KIP looks well motivated and > well designed. > > I’m +1 (binding) > > -John > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020, at 10:49, Harsha Ch wrote: > > +1 (binding). Good addition to MM 2. > > > > -Harsha > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM, Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding). > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ > gmail. > > > com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this > KIP. I > > >> was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and > > >> offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ > gmail. > > >> com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan < ryannedolan@ gmail. > com ( > > >>> ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang < ning2008wisc@ gmail. > com ( > > ning2008w...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello committers, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > > > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > > > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> https:/ / cwiki. apache. org/ confluence/ display/ KAFKA/ > KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2. > > >> 0 ( > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > >> ) > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar < edoardlists@ gmail. com ( > > > edoardli...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> thanks for the KIP ! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar < > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> navinder_brar@ yahoo. com ( navinder_b...@yahoo.com ) > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > .invalid> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>> Navinder > > >>> On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedolan@ > > >>> gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Ryanne > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley < tbentley@ redhat. > com ( > > >>> tbent...@redhat.com ) > > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofield@ live. > > com ( andrew_schofi...@live.com ) > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mickael. maison@ gmail. com ( mickael.mai...@gmail.com ) > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ryannedolan@ gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Looks like we've got the required votes! Congrats Ning! Please note this KIP was proposed and written by Ning Zhang, not myself, but we've collaborated on the PR, testing, and community outreach. Now lets work to get the PR merged! Ryanne On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 1:47 PM Bill Bejeck wrote: > Thanks for the clear well written KIP. > > This seems like a useful feature to me. > > +1(binding) > > -Bill > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:50 PM John Roesler wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP, Ryanne! > > > > It looks like a good feature to me, and the KIP looks well motivated and > > well designed. > > > > I’m +1 (binding) > > > > -John > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020, at 10:49, Harsha Ch wrote: > > > +1 (binding). Good addition to MM 2. > > > > > > -Harsha > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM, Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ > > gmail. > > > > com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this > > KIP. I > > > >> was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and > > > >> offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ > > gmail. > > > >> com ( maulin.vasav...@gmail.com ) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan < ryannedolan@ gmail. > > com ( > > > >>> ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang < ning2008wisc@ > gmail. > > com ( > > > ning2008w...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello committers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from > the > > > > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > > > > corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> https:/ / cwiki. apache. org/ confluence/ display/ KAFKA/ > > > KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2. > > > >> 0 ( > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > >> ) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar < edoardlists@ gmail. com > ( > > > > edoardli...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > >> thanks for the KIP ! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar < > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> navinder_brar@ yahoo. com ( navinder_b...@yahoo.com ) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .invalid> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>> Navinder > > > >>> On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedolan@ > > > >>> gmail. com ( ryannedo...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Ryanne > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley < tbentley@ redhat. > > com ( > > > >>> tbent...@redhat.com ) > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > andrew_schofield@ live. > > > com ( andrew_schofi...@live.com ) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (non-binding) thanks for the KIP ! On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Navinder > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > Ryanne > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" > > wrote: > > > > > >+1 (binding) > > >Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > ning2008w...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > >> > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai > wrote: > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > >> > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > > > the > > >> > following > > >> > > > small KIP: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > > > offsets to > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > > Currently, we > > >> > rely > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > > > into MM2 > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > > > workloads > > >> > between > > >> > > > clusters. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP. On 06/02/2020, 17:06, "Edoardo Comar" wrote: +1 (non-binding) thanks for the KIP ! On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Navinder > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > Ryanne > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" > > wrote: > > > > > >+1 (binding) > > >Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > ning2008w...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > >> > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai > wrote: > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > >> > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > > > the > > >> > following > > >> > > > small KIP: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > > > offsets to > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > > Currently, we > > >> > rely > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > > > into MM2 > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > > > workloads > > >> > between > > >> > > > clusters. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0
Hello committers, I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the corresponding PR will be reviewed soon. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 Thank you On 2020/02/06 17:05:41, Edoardo Comar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > thanks for the KIP ! > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Navinder > > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > > > Ryanne > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > > > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > >Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang < > > ning2008w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > >> > > > > >> > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai > > wrote: > > > >> > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > > > > the > > > >> > following > > > >> > > > small KIP: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > > > > offsets to > > > >> > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > > > Currently, we > > > >> > rely > > > >> > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > >> > kafka-consumer-groups > > > >> > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > > > > into MM2 > > > >> > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > > > > workloads > > > >> > between > > > >> > > > clusters. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Ryanne > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
