Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #392
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/392/ -- [...truncated 955 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.14s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestCodecReported [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSameTokenSamePosition [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheTermsFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestAttributeSource [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateSort [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestBinaryDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestLock [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestBytesRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestPriorityQueue [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocBoost [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNamedSPILoader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldInfos [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIsCurrent [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestScoreCachingWrappingScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestBitUtil [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #393
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/393/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4457) Combine MockRandomPostingsFormat and RandomCodec
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469188#comment-13469188 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4457: - I vote for calling it CentaurCodec :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Centaur_skeleton.jpg Combine MockRandomPostingsFormat and RandomCodec Key: LUCENE-4457 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4457 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Components: general/test Reporter: Robert Muir This is really confusing. I think MockRandomPF is mostly obselete, in that it writes a random seed file (.sd) so that its symmetrical when reading the index. this is no longer necessary (codecs must write what they need). But i think it does some other cool things, like randomizes more params like skipintervals and so on. we should make sure RandomCodec does all the evil things it does, delete MockRandomPostingsFormat, and rename RandomCodec to RandomPostingsFormat. Then add a real Random codec thats really a frankenstein and does things like switch up stored fields impl (LUCENE-4226) and so on. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-791) Allow to submit config and schema when creating a new core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469196#comment-13469196
]
Gaurav commented on SOLR-791:
-
I was surprised when I found it's not possible. I need to automated core
creation, which includes uploading the configuration schema files.
Allow to submit config and schema when creating a new core
--
Key: SOLR-791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-791
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: clients - java
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht
Currently it's possible to create cores remotely via SolrJ.
{code}
CoreAdminRequest.createCore(acore, acoreinstancedir, adminServer);
{code}
However, this process is incomplete because I need to manually log onto the
remote server and place a configuration file as well as a schema file into
the {{conf/}} folder in the {{acoreinstancedir/}}. It would be great it I can
simply submit those files together with the create core request.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4226) Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469216#comment-13469216
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4226:
--
bq. I'm not a fan of the skipBytes on DataInput. Its not actually necessary or
used for this patch?
You're right! I needed it in the first versions of the patch when I reused
Lucene40StoredFieldsFormat, but it looks like it's not needed anymore. Let's
get rid of it!
Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields
--
Key: LUCENE-4226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core/index
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
Attachments: CompressionBenchmark.java, CompressionBenchmark.java,
LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch,
LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, SnappyCompressionAlgorithm.java
I've been doing some experiments with stored fields lately. It is very common
for an index with stored fields enabled to have most of its space used by the
.fdt index file. To prevent this .fdt file from growing too much, one option
is to compress stored fields. Although compression works rather well for
large fields, this is not the case for small fields and the compression ratio
can be very close to 100%, even with efficient compression algorithms.
In order to improve the compression ratio for small fields, I've written a
{{StoredFieldsFormat}} that compresses several documents in a single chunk of
data. To see how it behaves in terms of document deserialization speed and
compression ratio, I've run several tests with different index compression
strategies on 100,000 docs from Mike's 1K Wikipedia articles (title and text
were indexed and stored):
- no compression,
- docs compressed with deflate (compression level = 1),
- docs compressed with deflate (compression level = 9),
- docs compressed with Snappy,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with deflate (level = 1) and
chunks of 6 docs,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with deflate (level = 9) and
chunks of 6 docs,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with Snappy and chunks of 6
docs.
For those who don't know Snappy, it is compression algorithm from Google
which has very high compression ratios, but compresses and decompresses data
very quickly.
{noformat}
Format Compression ratio IndexReader.document time
uncompressed 100% 100%
doc/deflate 1 59% 616%
doc/deflate 9 58% 595%
doc/snappy80% 129%
index/deflate 1 49% 966%
index/deflate 9 46% 938%
index/snappy 65% 264%
{noformat}
(doc = doc-level compression, index = index-level compression)
I find it interesting because it allows to trade speed for space (with
deflate, the .fdt file shrinks by a factor of 2, much better than with
doc-level compression). One other interesting thing is that {{index/snappy}}
is almost as compact as {{doc/deflate}} while it is more than 2x faster at
retrieving documents from disk.
These tests have been done on a hot OS cache, which is the worst case for
compressed fields (one can expect better results for formats that have a high
compression ratio since they probably require fewer read/write operations
from disk).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58) - Build # 1536 - Failure!
Clean up static fields (in @AfterClass?), your test seems to hang on to approximately 11,197,432 bytes (threshold is 10,485,760). Field reference sizes (counted individually): - 11,724,336 bytes, private static Committed a field cleanup. Dawid - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4458) some improvements about the latent semantic search, more details are in Description part
wang jianping created LUCENE-4458: - Summary: some improvements about the latent semantic search, more details are in Description part Key: LUCENE-4458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4458 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement Components: core/query/scoring Reporter: wang jianping Hi,all,Recently I invented a new ranking algorithm inspired by the theory of spread activation and probabilistic model, which can find the latent semantic relationship between docs and terms and is almost linear time, and I took one afternoon to code and implement this algorithm. And the testing result shows that the speed of this algorithm is much faster than the famous Latent Semantic Analysis algorithm, and the affect is almost as good as the LSA. I wanna share my idea to all of you and add this algorithm to the Lucene project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-791) Allow to submit config and schema when creating a new core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469285#comment-13469285
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-791:
-
To actually work, you'd need to upload essentially all of the conf directory,
as well as any sub-directories. For instance, what about stopwords.txt?
protwords.txt? the velocity and xslt subdirs? dictionary files? elevate.xml?
currency.xml? Simply uploading the schema.xml and solrconfig.xml files will
fail if any filter references, say, stopwords.txt.
Allow to submit config and schema when creating a new core
--
Key: SOLR-791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-791
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: clients - java
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht
Currently it's possible to create cores remotely via SolrJ.
{code}
CoreAdminRequest.createCore(acore, acoreinstancedir, adminServer);
{code}
However, this process is incomplete because I need to manually log onto the
remote server and place a configuration file as well as a schema file into
the {{conf/}} folder in the {{acoreinstancedir/}}. It would be great it I can
simply submit those files together with the create core request.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #559
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/559/ -- [...truncated 935 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.47s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.16s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRecyclingByteBlockAllocator [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #560
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/560/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #559
Does this test failure only ever happen on java6? I think its funny it fails on my windows machine (using java6_23) but has not tripped on my linux one (using java7_01) On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:00 AM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/559/ -- [...truncated 935 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.47s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.16s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4459: --- Summary: TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #392
Is this 100ms timeout arbitrary? this failed on my slow windows computer, nobody knows what it could have also be doing (DEFRAG or something)... can we improve the test? On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:26 AM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/392/ -- [...truncated 955 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.14s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestCodecReported [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSameTokenSamePosition [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheTermsFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestAttributeSource [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateSort [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestBinaryDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestLock [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestBytesRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestPriorityQueue [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocBoost [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNamedSPILoader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldInfos [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIsCurrent [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_05) - Build # 209 - Failure!
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: Could be that it hits c2 optimization based on different statistics? You could try to log internal compilation logs but it's going to be pretty verbose... this failed on my windows computer (32-bit -client). so i don't think this is really involved. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_07) - Build # 1037 - Failure!
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows/1037/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_07 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 24014 lines...] BUILD FAILED C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\build.xml:352: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\build.xml:65: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\build.xml:511: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:1910: Can't get https://issues.apache.org/jira/rest/api/2/project/LUCENE to C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\build\docs\changes\jiraVersionList.json Total time: 50 minutes 55 seconds Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure Recording test results Description set: Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_07 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC Email was triggered for: Failure Sending email for trigger: Failure - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4456) IndexWriter makes unrefed files, and MockDir cannot detect it
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4456. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 5.0 IndexWriter makes unrefed files, and MockDir cannot detect it - Key: LUCENE-4456 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4456 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Michael McCandless Fix For: 5.0, 4.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4456_mdw_patch.txt, LUCENE-4456.patch, LUCENE-4456.patch Because MockDir calls crash() before it checks for unreferenced files, deletes are no longer allowed. this means the unreferenced files check is useless! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #621
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/621/ -- [...truncated 905 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.22s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.TestAllFilesHaveCodecHeader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestForTooMuchCloning [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.27s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.34s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 22 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.14s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.19s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #622
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/622/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 - Build # 731 - Failure
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/731/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 23346 lines...] BUILD FAILED /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/build.xml:352: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/build.xml:65: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/lucene/build.xml:511: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/lucene/common-build.xml:1910: Can't get https://issues.apache.org/jira/rest/api/2/project/LUCENE to /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/lucene/build/docs/changes/jiraVersionList.json Total time: 47 minutes 4 seconds Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure Recording test results Email was triggered for: Failure Sending email for trigger: Failure - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #628
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/628/ -- [...truncated 740 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestExternalCodecs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.00s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestExceptionInBeforeClassHooks [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.17s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.27s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.14s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.63s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s J2 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFilterAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #629
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/629/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #909
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/909/ -- [...truncated 880 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestForceMergeForever [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.41s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleSearchEquivalence [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.33s, 12 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.31s, 21 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadNearQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.19s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.30s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPrefixCodedTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.30s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermConstantScore [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.27s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocsAndPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.20s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestUnicodeUtil [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.16s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.11s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.15s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSentinelIntSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.33s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestForTooMuchCloning [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.64s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #910
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/910/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #621
I'll take a look shortly. I must have forgotten to merge Mike's fix to simpketexts siwriter. On Oct 4, 2012 10:13 AM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/621/ -- [...truncated 905 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.22s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.TestAllFilesHaveCodecHeader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestForTooMuchCloning [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.27s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.34s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 22 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.14s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.19s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4443) BlockPostingsFormat writes unnecessary skipdata
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469407#comment-13469407 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-4443: - Shouldn't we push this into 4.0 rather than ship 4.0 and already *know* you have to reindex if you use this? BlockPostingsFormat writes unnecessary skipdata --- Key: LUCENE-4443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4443 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Components: core/codecs Affects Versions: 4.0 Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4443.patch Seems to me lastStartOffset is unnecessary, when we skip to a document, it implicitly is 0: see BlockPostingsWriter.startDoc. (Unless I'm missing something, all tests pass with Block if i remove it) Separately we should really think about lastPayloadByteUpto, is this worth it? instead when we actually skip, we could sum the payloadLengthBuffer from 0..curPosBufferUpto as we are going to decode that block anyway? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #916
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/916/ -- [...truncated 873 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.20s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestExternalCodecs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestExceptionInBeforeClassHooks [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.12s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.23s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFilterAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestDirectory [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s J0 | TestDirectory.testThreadSafety [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSameTokenSamePosition [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestExplanations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #917
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/917/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #918
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/918/ -- [...truncated 879 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestForTooMuchCloning [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestCompiledAutomaton [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestExternalCodecs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.22s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.14s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.43s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.29s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J2 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSeedFromUncaught [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestDirectory [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | TestDirectory.testThreadSafety [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestJUnitRuleOrder [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #919
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/919/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #920
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/920/ -- [...truncated 875 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.04s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 22 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSeedFromUncaught [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestDirectory [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s J0 | TestDirectory.testThreadSafety [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestJUnitRuleOrder [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #921
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/921/ -- [...truncated 873 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.13s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J2 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFilterAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSeedFromUncaught [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.04s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRecyclingByteBlockAllocator [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDateTools [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestJUnitRuleOrder [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestCodecReported [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestElevationComparator [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheTermsFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMatchAllDocsQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQueryUnicode [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s J3 | TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash.testNRTThreads [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestBinaryDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopScoreDocCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestLock [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestPriorityQueue
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #922
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/922/ -- [...truncated 882 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.31s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s J0 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSeedFromUncaught [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestJUnitRuleOrder [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestCodecReported [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSameTokenSamePosition [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheTermsFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMatchAllDocsQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.01s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimilarity [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateSort [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J3 | TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash.testNRTThreads [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #923
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/923/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4458) some improvements about the latent semantic search, more details are in Description part
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469427#comment-13469427 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-4458: -- [~wangjpzju] - sounds good! Please have a look at http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToContribute . some improvements about the latent semantic search, more details are in Description part Key: LUCENE-4458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4458 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement Components: core/query/scoring Reporter: wang jianping Hi,all,Recently I invented a new ranking algorithm inspired by the theory of spread activation and probabilistic model, which can find the latent semantic relationship between docs and terms and is almost linear time, and I took one afternoon to code and implement this algorithm. And the testing result shows that the speed of this algorithm is much faster than the famous Latent Semantic Analysis algorithm, and the affect is almost as good as the LSA. I wanna share my idea to all of you and add this algorithm to the Lucene project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #922
I had svn problems: fixed. sorry for the noise On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:50 AM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/922/ -- [...truncated 882 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.31s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s J0 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSeedFromUncaught [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestJUnitRuleOrder [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestCodecReported [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSameTokenSamePosition [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheTermsFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMatchAllDocsQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.01s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimilarity [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateSort [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4443) BlockPostingsFormat writes unnecessary skipdata
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469429#comment-13469429 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4443: - Well this is an experimental codec (not the default format), and its likely we might change it anyway. I really don't like the idea of backporting optimizations to the release branch. Nobody has to reindex if they dont want anyway, they can use addIndexes or whatever to switch their index back to the lucene's official index format, upgrade to 4.1, and then switch back to the new block. BlockPostingsFormat writes unnecessary skipdata --- Key: LUCENE-4443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4443 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Components: core/codecs Affects Versions: 4.0 Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4443.patch Seems to me lastStartOffset is unnecessary, when we skip to a document, it implicitly is 0: see BlockPostingsWriter.startDoc. (Unless I'm missing something, all tests pass with Block if i remove it) Separately we should really think about lastPayloadByteUpto, is this worth it? instead when we actually skip, we could sum the payloadLengthBuffer from 0..curPosBufferUpto as we are going to decode that block anyway? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #628
This looks like a bug in junit4 [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] JVM J0: 0.84 .. 116.39 = 115.55s [junit4:junit4] JVM J2: 0.86 .. 115.92 = 115.06s [junit4:junit4] JVM J3: 0.86 .. 120.09 = 119.23s [junit4:junit4] Execution time total: 2 minutes [junit4:junit4] ERROR: JVM J1 ended with an exception, command line: c:\program files (x86)\java\jdk1.6.0_23\jre\bin\java.exe -Dtests.prefix=tests -Dtests.seed=2DB87A0F18AB60A -Xmx512M -Dtests.iters= -Dtests.verbose=false -Dtests.infostream=false -Dtests.lockdir=http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build -Dtests.codec=random -Dtests.postingsformat=random -Dtests.locale=random -Dtests.timezone=random -Dtests.directory=random -Dtests.linedocsfile=europarl.lines.txt.gz -Dtests.luceneMatchVersion=4.0 -Dtests.cleanthreads=perMethod -Djava.util.logging.config.file=http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/tools/junit4/logging.properties -Dtests.nightly=false -Dtests.weekly=false -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.asserts.gracious=false -Dtests.multiplier=1 -DtempDir=. -Djava.io.tmpdir=. -Dtests.sandbox.dir=http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build/core -Dclover.db.dir=http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build/clover/db -Djava.security.manager=org.apache.lucene.util.TestSecurityManager -Djava.security.policy=http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/tools/junit4/tests.policy -Dlucene.version=4.0-SNAPSHOT -Djetty.testMode=1 -Djetty.insecurerandom=1 -Dsolr.directoryFactory=org.apache.solr.core.MockDirectoryFactory -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -classpath http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build/test-framework/classes/java;C:\Users\rmuir\.jenkins\workspace\slow-io-beasting\build\codecs\classes\java;http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/test-framework/lib/junit-4.10.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.jenkins\workspace\slow-io-beasting\test-framework\lib\randomizedtesting-runner-2.0.1.jar;http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build/core/classes/java;C:\Users\rmuir\.jenkins\workspace\slow-io-beasting\build\core\classes\test;c:\program files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-launcher.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\apache-rat-0.7.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\apache-rat-core-0.7.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\apache-rat-plugin-0.7.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\apache-rat-tasks-0.7.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\commons-cli-1.1.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\commons-collections-3.2.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\commons-compress-1.0.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\commons-io-1.4.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\commons-lang-2.1.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ant\lib\ivy-2.2.0.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-antlr.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-bcel.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-bsf.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-log4j.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-oro.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-regexp.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-resolver.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-apache-xalan2.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-commons-logging.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-commons-net.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-jai.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-javamail.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-jdepend.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-jmf.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-jsch.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-junit.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-junit4.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-netrexx.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-swing.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant-testutil.jar;C:\Program Files\apache-ant-1.8.2\lib\ant.jar;c:\program files (x86)\java\jdk1.6.0_23\lib\tools.jar;C:\Users\rmuir\.ivy2\cache\com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting\junit4-ant\jars\junit4-ant-2.0.1.jar -ea:org.apache.lucene... -ea:org.apache.solr... com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMainSafe -eventsfile http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build/core/test/junit4-J1-20121004_102423_273.events @http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/ws/build/core/test/junit4-J1-20121004_102423_273.suites [junit4:junit4] ERROR: JVM J1 ended with an exception: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 10 [junit4:junit4] at java.util.ArrayList.add(ArrayList.java:352) [junit4:junit4] at com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.JUnit4.getWorkingDirectory(JUnit4.java:1326) [junit4:junit4] at com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.JUnit4.forkProcess(JUnit4.java:1294) [junit4:junit4] at com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.JUnit4.executeSlave(JUnit4.java:1178) [junit4:junit4] at
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_07) - Build # 1038 - Still Failing!
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows/1038/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_07 -XX:+UseParallelGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 27177 lines...] BUILD FAILED C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\build.xml:245: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\build.xml:551: Unable to delete file C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\analysis\icu\lib\icu4j-49.1.jar Total time: 53 minutes 15 seconds Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure Recording test results Description set: Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_07 -XX:+UseParallelGC Email was triggered for: Failure Sending email for trigger: Failure - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3449) QueryComponent.doFieldSortValues throw ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when has maxDoc=0 Segment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469462#comment-13469462
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3449:
Hmmm, that's interesting... I don't ever recall seeing 0 document segments
before.
I wonder if this could possibly be a problem in the 4x line?
SolrIndexReader no longer exists in 4.0, but the equivalent functionality to
locate a segment in lucene could have the same issues (if it's possible to have
0 document sub-readers in 4x).
QueryComponent.doFieldSortValues throw ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when
has maxDoc=0 Segment
---
Key: SOLR-3449
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3449
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: search
Affects Versions: 3.5, 3.6
Reporter: Linbin Chen
Fix For: 3.6.2
Attachments: SOLR-3449.patch
have index
{code}
Segment name=_9, offest=[docBase=0, maxDoc=245] idx=0
Segment name=_a, offest=[docBase=245, maxDoc=3] idx=1
Segment name=_b, offest=[docBase=248, maxDoc=0] idx=2
Segment name=_c, offest=[docBase=248, maxDoc=1] idx=3
Segment name=_d, offest=[docBase=249, maxDoc=0] idx=4
Segment name=_e, offest=[docBase=249, maxDoc=1] idx=5
Segment name=_f, offest=[docBase=250, maxDoc=0] idx=6
Segment name=_g, offest=[docBase=250, maxDoc=3] idx=7
Segment name=_h, offest=[docBase=253, maxDoc=0] idx=8
{code}
maxDoc=0 's Segment maybe create by mergeIndexes。(can make sure maxDoc=0 's
segment not merge, but when couldn't control merge indexes)
when use fsv=true get sort values, hit docId=249 throw
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
{code}
2012-5-11 14:28:28 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
ERROR: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
at
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldComparator$LongComparator.copy(FieldComparator.java:600)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.doFieldSortValues(QueryComponent.java:463)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.process(QueryComponent.java:400)
{code}
reason:
{code}
//idx 012345678
//int[] maxDocs={245, 3, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0};
int[] offsets = { 0, 245, 248, 248, 249, 249, 250, 250, 253};
org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexReader.readerIndex(249, offsets) return idx=4
not 5。
{code}
correct idx=5。
patch
{code}
Index: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexReader.java
===
--- solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexReader.java
(revision 1337028)
+++ solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexReader.java
(working copy)
@@ -138,6 +138,16 @@
}
else {
// exact match on the offset.
+ //skip equal offest
+ for(int i=mid+1; i=high; i++) {
+ if(doc == offsets[i]) {
+ //skip offests[i] == doc
+ mid = i;
+ } else {
+ //stop skip offest
+ break;
+ }
+ }
return mid;
}
}
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #668
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/668/ -- [...truncated 934 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.10s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s J1 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFilterAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDateTools [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestReaderClosed [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestElevationComparator [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestExplanations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMatchAllDocsQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestAttributeSource [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestLock [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIntsRef [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVirtualMethod [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocBoost [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNamedSPILoader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldInfos [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollback [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositiveScoresOnlyCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersion [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterLockRelease [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCloseableThreadLocal [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNewestSegment [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestCachingTokenFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #669
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/669/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-3913) SimplePostTool optimize does a redundant commit
David Smiley created SOLR-3913:
--
Summary: SimplePostTool optimize does a redundant commit
Key: SOLR-3913
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3913
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: scripts and tools
Reporter: David Smiley
Priority: Minor
At the end of SimplePostTool.execute() there is:
{code}
if (commit) commit();
if (optimize) optimize();
{code}
Each of these calls involves a separate request to Solr. The thing is, an
optimize internally commits, and so the logic should forgo committing is
optimize is true.
And as an aside, I think the 1kb pipe() buffer on line 893 is too small; it
should be around 8kb (8192) bytes which is the same value as
BufferedInputStream's default.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469470#comment-13469470 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4459: +1 This test has also tripped on both Uwe's build box (http://markmail.org/thread/yrg3rnorefq5jqq6) and Simon's (http://markmail.org/thread/qcjegwszimqrgs3y). It also fails quite easily for me when running Zing (free for open-source dev...). TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469471#comment-13469471
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4459:
Here's the exc when it fails:
{noformat}
[junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestWeakIdentityMap
[junit4:junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test
-Dtestcase=TestWeakIdentityMap -Dtests.method=testConcurrentHashMap
-Dtests.seed=3BF33FCBB5027789 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=es_UY
-Dtests.timezone=Europe/Volgograd -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1
[junit4:junit4] FAILURE 1.26s J0 | TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap
[junit4:junit4] Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError:
iteratorSize(0)=newSize(1)
[junit4:junit4]at
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3BF33FCBB5027789:BA829794CBA28EFB]:0)
[junit4:junit4]at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
[junit4:junit4]at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap(TestWeakIdentityMap.java:234)
[junit4:junit4]at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
[junit4:junit4]at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
[junit4:junit4]at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
[junit4:junit4]at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1559)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$600(RandomizedRunner.java:79)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:737)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:773)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:787)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleFieldCacheSanity$1.evaluate(TestRuleFieldCacheSanity.java:51)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:70)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:358)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:782)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:442)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:746)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:648)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:682)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:693)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
[junit4:junit4]at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
[junit4:junit4]at
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:43)
[junit4:junit4]at
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #392
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Is this 100ms timeout arbitrary? this failed on my slow windows computer, nobody knows what it could have also be doing (DEFRAG or something)... can we improve the test? I committed a fix ... removing some (not all) of the reliance on timeouts ... so now it may hang indefinitely if we have a bug, but since the build now shows beating hearts (aside: it really should play a sound to go along with this) and times out after 2 hours I think it's OK. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469493#comment-13469493 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4459: --- Don't disable the test, we can maybe disable this part of the assert. I will take a look. TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #995
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/995/ -- [...truncated 890 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.48s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.14s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.15s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.12s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestExceptionInBeforeClassHooks [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.10s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.12s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.14s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.28s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.10s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.10s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.15s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #996
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/996/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #628
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/628/ I'll take a look. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4399: Attachment: LUCENE-4399.patch Updated patch for 4.1: * fixes blocktree not to seek on write * changes are backwards compatible * we can deprecate/remove appending codec, we should just keep its test. Personally I think i like this better. Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec - Key: LUCENE-4399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new Appending43Codec). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #995
I'll dig ... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/995/ -- [...truncated 890 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.48s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.14s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.15s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.12s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestExceptionInBeforeClassHooks [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.10s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.12s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.14s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.28s, 69 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.10s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.10s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.15s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #1033
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/1033/ -- [...truncated 872 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsWriter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.27s, 13 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.32s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocTermOrds [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.27s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.26s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.10s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.15s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.10s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.26s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 22 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s J0 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSeedFromUncaught
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #1034
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/1034/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #1033
I'm gonna look at this one. I think its the same issue mike is debugging, but who knows On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:42 PM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/1033/ -- [...truncated 872 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsWriter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.27s, 13 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.32s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocTermOrds [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.27s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.26s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.10s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.15s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.10s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.07s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 31 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.26s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 22 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s J0 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 4 tests
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-791) Allow to submit config and schema when creating a new core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gaurav updated SOLR-791:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I was surprised when I found it's not possible. I need to automated core
creation, which includes uploading the configuration schema files. )
Allow to submit config and schema when creating a new core
--
Key: SOLR-791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-791
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: clients - java
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht
Currently it's possible to create cores remotely via SolrJ.
{code}
CoreAdminRequest.createCore(acore, acoreinstancedir, adminServer);
{code}
However, this process is incomplete because I need to manually log onto the
remote server and place a configuration file as well as a schema file into
the {{conf/}} folder in the {{acoreinstancedir/}}. It would be great it I can
simply submit those files together with the create core request.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58) - Build # 1535 - Failure!
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/1535/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreEmbeddedTest Error Message: Clean up static fields (in @AfterClass?), your test seems to hang on to approximately 10,649,000 bytes (threshold is 10,485,760). Field reference sizes (counted individually): - 10,835,360 bytes, protected static org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer org.apache.solr.client.solrj.MultiCoreExampleTestBase.cores - 264 bytes, public static org.junit.rules.TestRule org.apache.solr.util.AbstractSolrTestCase.solrClassRules Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Clean up static fields (in @AfterClass?), your test seems to hang on to approximately 10,649,000 bytes (threshold is 10,485,760). Field reference sizes (counted individually): - 10,835,360 bytes, protected static org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer org.apache.solr.client.solrj.MultiCoreExampleTestBase.cores - 264 bytes, public static org.junit.rules.TestRule org.apache.solr.util.AbstractSolrTestCase.solrClassRules at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([1B49C5E01D960265]:0) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StaticFieldsInvariantRule$1.afterAlways(StaticFieldsInvariantRule.java:127) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:43) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:70) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:358) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) Build Log: [...truncated 9343 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreEmbeddedTest [junit4:junit4] 2 24709 T387 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.startTrackingSearchers WARNING startTrackingSearchers: numOpens=7 numCloses=7 [junit4:junit4] 2 24721 T387 oasu.AbstractSolrTestCase.setUp SETUP_START testMultiCore [junit4:junit4] 2 24722 T387 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.init new SolrResourceLoader for directory: '/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/example/multicore/collection1/' [junit4:junit4] 2 24750 T387 oasc.SolrConfig.init Using Lucene MatchVersion: LUCENE_41 [junit4:junit4] 2 24781 T387 oasc.SolrConfig.init Loaded SolrConfig: /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/example/multicore/core0/conf/solrconfig.xml [junit4:junit4] 2 24782 T387 oass.IndexSchema.readSchema Reading Solr Schema [junit4:junit4] 2 24784 T387 oass.IndexSchema.readSchema Schema name=example core zero [junit4:junit4] 2 24802 T387 oass.IndexSchema.readSchema default search field in schema is name [junit4:junit4] 2 24803 T387 oass.IndexSchema.readSchema query parser default operator is OR [junit4:junit4] 2 24804 T387 oass.IndexSchema.readSchema unique key field: id [junit4:junit4] 2 24805 T387 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.locateSolrHome JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx) [junit4:junit4] 2 24805 T387 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.locateSolrHome using system property solr.solr.home: /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/example/multicore [junit4:junit4] 2 24805 T387 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.init new SolrResourceLoader for directory: '/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/example/multicore/' [junit4:junit4] 2 24810 T387 oasc.CoreContainer.init New CoreContainer 31706048 [junit4:junit4] 2 24811 T387 oasc.SolrCore.init [collection1] Opening new SolrCore at /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/example/multicore/collection1/, dataDir=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/build/solr-solrj/test/J0/./org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreEmbeddedTest-1349375783093/ [junit4:junit4] 2 24811 T387 oasc.SolrCore.init JMX monitoring not detected for core: collection1 [junit4:junit4] 2 24812 T387 oasc.SolrCore.getNewIndexDir New index directory detected: old=null new=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/build/solr-solrj/test/J0/./org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreEmbeddedTest-1349375783093/index/ [junit4:junit4] 2 24812 T387 oasc.SolrCore.initIndex WARNING [collection1] Solr index directory '/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/solr/build/solr-solrj/test/J0/./org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreEmbeddedTest-1349375783093/index' doesn't exist. Creating new index... [junit4:junit4] 2
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58) - Build # 1546 - Still Failing!
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/1546/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58 -XX:+UseParallelGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 9011 lines...] [junit4:junit4] ERROR: JVM J0 ended with an exception, command line: /mnt/ssd/jenkins/tools/java/64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58/jre/bin/java -XX:+UseParallelGC -Dtests.prefix=tests -Dtests.seed=9E3DBC201BAFBDDD -Xmx512M -Dtests.iters= -Dtests.verbose=false -Dtests.infostream=false -Dtests.lockdir=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build -Dtests.codec=random -Dtests.postingsformat=random -Dtests.locale=random -Dtests.timezone=random -Dtests.directory=random -Dtests.linedocsfile=europarl.lines.txt.gz -Dtests.luceneMatchVersion=5.0 -Dtests.cleanthreads=perClass -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/solr/testlogging.properties -Dtests.nightly=false -Dtests.weekly=false -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.asserts.gracious=false -Dtests.multiplier=3 -DtempDir=. -Djava.io.tmpdir=. -Dtests.sandbox.dir=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/solr/build/solr-core -Dclover.db.dir=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build/clover/db -Djava.security.manager=org.apache.lucene.util.TestSecurityManager -Djava.security.policy=/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/tools/junit4/tests.policy -Dlucene.version=5.0-SNAPSHOT -Djetty.testMode=1 -Djetty.insecurerandom=1 -Dsolr.directoryFactory=org.apache.solr.core.MockDirectoryFactory -Djava.awt.headless=true -classpath
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #761
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/761/ -- [...truncated 5378 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.13s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.16s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.20s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.13s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.22s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRandomStoredFields [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 7.55s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.55s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.13s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.17s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J2 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #762
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/762/changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #761
False alarm: this ran before I committed my patch to the branch ... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote: See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/761/ -- [...truncated 5378 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.13s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.16s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.20s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.13s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.22s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRandomStoredFields [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 7.55s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcard [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.55s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.13s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.17s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoDeletionPolicy [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J2 | Test2BPostings.test
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3842) Analyzing Suggester
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469608#comment-13469608 ] Sudarshan Gaikaiwari commented on LUCENE-3842: -- +1. This is awesome. It would be great to get this in trunk. Analyzing Suggester --- Key: LUCENE-3842 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Components: modules/spellchecker Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Michael McCandless Attachments: LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842-TokenStream_to_Automaton.patch Since we added shortest-path wFSA search in LUCENE-3714, and generified the comparator in LUCENE-3801, I think we should look at implementing suggesters that have more capabilities than just basic prefix matching. In particular I think the most flexible approach is to integrate with Analyzer at both build and query time, such that we build a wFST with: input: analyzed text such as ghost0christmas0past -- byte 0 here is an optional token separator output: surface form such as the ghost of christmas past weight: the weight of the suggestion we make an FST with PairOutputsweight,output, but only do the shortest path operation on the weight side (like the test in LUCENE-3801), at the same time accumulating the output (surface form), which will be the actual suggestion. This allows a lot of flexibility: * Using even standardanalyzer means you can offer suggestions that ignore stopwords, e.g. if you type in ghost of chr..., it will suggest the ghost of christmas past * we can add support for synonyms/wdf/etc at both index and query time (there are tradeoffs here, and this is not implemented!) * this is a basis for more complicated suggesters such as Japanese suggesters, where the analyzed form is in fact the reading, so we would add a TokenFilter that copies ReadingAttribute into term text to support that... * other general things like offering suggestions that are more fuzzy like using a plural stemmer or ignoring accents or whatever. According to my benchmarks, suggestions are still very fast with the prototype (e.g. ~ 100,000 QPS), and the FST size does not explode (its short of twice that of a regular wFST, but this is still far smaller than TST or JaSpell, etc). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3842) Analyzing Suggester
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469612#comment-13469612 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3842: Thanks Sudarshan! It's actually already committed (will be in 4.1) ... I just forgot to resolve ... Analyzing Suggester --- Key: LUCENE-3842 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Components: modules/spellchecker Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Michael McCandless Attachments: LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842-TokenStream_to_Automaton.patch Since we added shortest-path wFSA search in LUCENE-3714, and generified the comparator in LUCENE-3801, I think we should look at implementing suggesters that have more capabilities than just basic prefix matching. In particular I think the most flexible approach is to integrate with Analyzer at both build and query time, such that we build a wFST with: input: analyzed text such as ghost0christmas0past -- byte 0 here is an optional token separator output: surface form such as the ghost of christmas past weight: the weight of the suggestion we make an FST with PairOutputsweight,output, but only do the shortest path operation on the weight side (like the test in LUCENE-3801), at the same time accumulating the output (surface form), which will be the actual suggestion. This allows a lot of flexibility: * Using even standardanalyzer means you can offer suggestions that ignore stopwords, e.g. if you type in ghost of chr..., it will suggest the ghost of christmas past * we can add support for synonyms/wdf/etc at both index and query time (there are tradeoffs here, and this is not implemented!) * this is a basis for more complicated suggesters such as Japanese suggesters, where the analyzed form is in fact the reading, so we would add a TokenFilter that copies ReadingAttribute into term text to support that... * other general things like offering suggestions that are more fuzzy like using a plural stemmer or ignoring accents or whatever. According to my benchmarks, suggestions are still very fast with the prototype (e.g. ~ 100,000 QPS), and the FST size does not explode (its short of twice that of a regular wFST, but this is still far smaller than TST or JaSpell, etc). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3842) Analyzing Suggester
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3842. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.0 4.1 Analyzing Suggester --- Key: LUCENE-3842 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3842 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Components: modules/spellchecker Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Michael McCandless Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842.patch, LUCENE-3842-TokenStream_to_Automaton.patch Since we added shortest-path wFSA search in LUCENE-3714, and generified the comparator in LUCENE-3801, I think we should look at implementing suggesters that have more capabilities than just basic prefix matching. In particular I think the most flexible approach is to integrate with Analyzer at both build and query time, such that we build a wFST with: input: analyzed text such as ghost0christmas0past -- byte 0 here is an optional token separator output: surface form such as the ghost of christmas past weight: the weight of the suggestion we make an FST with PairOutputsweight,output, but only do the shortest path operation on the weight side (like the test in LUCENE-3801), at the same time accumulating the output (surface form), which will be the actual suggestion. This allows a lot of flexibility: * Using even standardanalyzer means you can offer suggestions that ignore stopwords, e.g. if you type in ghost of chr..., it will suggest the ghost of christmas past * we can add support for synonyms/wdf/etc at both index and query time (there are tradeoffs here, and this is not implemented!) * this is a basis for more complicated suggesters such as Japanese suggesters, where the analyzed form is in fact the reading, so we would add a TokenFilter that copies ReadingAttribute into term text to support that... * other general things like offering suggestions that are more fuzzy like using a plural stemmer or ignoring accents or whatever. According to my benchmarks, suggestions are still very fast with the prototype (e.g. ~ 100,000 QPS), and the FST size does not explode (its short of twice that of a regular wFST, but this is still far smaller than TST or JaSpell, etc). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #795
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/795/ -- [...truncated 905 lines...] [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.22s, 16 tests, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestUnicodeUtil [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.30s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.34s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.17s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.27s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.15s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.12s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.12s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.17s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterConfig [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 9 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestBeforeAfterOverrides [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocValuesScoring [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDateTools [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestCodecReported [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearch [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestElevationComparator [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #796
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/796/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4226) Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-4226:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-4226.patch
New patch that removes {{DataInput.skipBytes}}, this patch does not have any
modifications in lucene-core anymore.
Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields
--
Key: LUCENE-4226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core/index
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
Attachments: CompressionBenchmark.java, CompressionBenchmark.java,
LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch,
LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch,
SnappyCompressionAlgorithm.java
I've been doing some experiments with stored fields lately. It is very common
for an index with stored fields enabled to have most of its space used by the
.fdt index file. To prevent this .fdt file from growing too much, one option
is to compress stored fields. Although compression works rather well for
large fields, this is not the case for small fields and the compression ratio
can be very close to 100%, even with efficient compression algorithms.
In order to improve the compression ratio for small fields, I've written a
{{StoredFieldsFormat}} that compresses several documents in a single chunk of
data. To see how it behaves in terms of document deserialization speed and
compression ratio, I've run several tests with different index compression
strategies on 100,000 docs from Mike's 1K Wikipedia articles (title and text
were indexed and stored):
- no compression,
- docs compressed with deflate (compression level = 1),
- docs compressed with deflate (compression level = 9),
- docs compressed with Snappy,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with deflate (level = 1) and
chunks of 6 docs,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with deflate (level = 9) and
chunks of 6 docs,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with Snappy and chunks of 6
docs.
For those who don't know Snappy, it is compression algorithm from Google
which has very high compression ratios, but compresses and decompresses data
very quickly.
{noformat}
Format Compression ratio IndexReader.document time
uncompressed 100% 100%
doc/deflate 1 59% 616%
doc/deflate 9 58% 595%
doc/snappy80% 129%
index/deflate 1 49% 966%
index/deflate 9 46% 938%
index/snappy 65% 264%
{noformat}
(doc = doc-level compression, index = index-level compression)
I find it interesting because it allows to trade speed for space (with
deflate, the .fdt file shrinks by a factor of 2, much better than with
doc-level compression). One other interesting thing is that {{index/snappy}}
is almost as compact as {{doc/deflate}} while it is more than 2x faster at
retrieving documents from disk.
These tests have been done on a hot OS cache, which is the worst case for
compressed fields (one can expect better results for formats that have a high
compression ratio since they probably require fewer read/write operations
from disk).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469674#comment-13469674
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4399:
--
{noformat}
+if (indexVersion != version) {
+ throw new CorruptIndexException(mixmatched version files: + in +
= + version + , + indexIn + = + indexVersion);
+}
{noformat}
If we force the terms version and the terms index version to be the same, maybe
we should merge TERMS_INDEX_VERSION_CURRENT and TERMS_VERSION_CURRENT into a
single constant?
Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
-
Key: LUCENE-4399
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.1
Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch
In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name
should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave
Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new
Appending43Codec).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469680#comment-13469680 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4399: - We dont force them to be the same. But to date they have been, and its currently still the case, so i check it. in the future its possible we might need to bump something about just the terms index file or whatever. Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec - Key: LUCENE-4399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new Appending43Codec). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469692#comment-13469692 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4399: -- If it makes sense to check that the versions of both files are consistent, maybe we should still merge the version numbers into a single one and bump it whenever any of the file formats changes? (similarly to Lucene40StoredFieldsWriter) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec - Key: LUCENE-4399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new Appending43Codec). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469700#comment-13469700 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4399: - I dont its a goal to check that they are really consistent? Really we can remove this check. I think every file should have its own name and version number. If XYZ writer has 10 files, then it should have 10 independent codec names and version numbers. This was a bug in this stuff before (LUCENE-3621). For the stored fields writer i'm not pedantic enough to go fix the fact it shares version numbers, but I'm just saying we really have to always look at this conceptually as a per-file thing. Otherwise we defeat a lot of the purpose of having a codec header at all (verifying this file really is what you think it is, and the version you think it is). Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec - Key: LUCENE-4399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new Appending43Codec). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469707#comment-13469707 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4459: --- There are only a few cases when this can happen and one can reproduce the exact bug behaviour: It looks like in some cases, WeakReferences are already cleared before they appear in the ReferenceQueue (which is perfectly fine). In that case, the iterator will filter out those removed values, but the size() call later will still report them. This is somehow a bug in the test (wrong assumption: the ReferenceQueue will contain the items before they are removed). But we can do better (and make the test work). We keep the backing map up-to-date by quickly removing the GCed values in the iterator. I will attach a patch with some minor cleanups to make the code look like FilterIterator. TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469713#comment-13469713 ] Jukka Zitting commented on LUCENE-3167: --- We discussed this briefly with Tommaso and a few OSGi experts last week. While adding bundle metadata to the Lucene jars is fairly straightforward to implement, doing so comes with a commitment to maintain correct semantic versioning at the package-level (see http://www.osgi.org/wiki/uploads/Links/SemanticVersioning.pdf). Without such a commitment the package version information will eventually become outdated and incorrect, which can lead to tricky problems for OSGi deployments. Most notably properly managed package versions will often *not* follow the main product version numbers, as even when backwards-incompatible changes is introduced in one package, another package might still remain unchanged. The best incremental solution here could be to initially export only one or two key packages for which semantic version information can be maintained without too much overhead going forward. A good starting point could be something like a separate facade package for which stronger-than-usual backwards compatibility promises can be made. Once there's more OSGi experience in the core Lucene community, more packages can be exported to OSGi clients. Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-4459: -- Attachment: LUCENE-4459.patch Patch. This is not a bug, so no need to backport to 4.0 or 3.6. It is just an improvement, whcih makes the test pass always! TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Attachments: LUCENE-4459.patch There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469736#comment-13469736 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3167: - This seems like a significantly more complicated issue then than just modifying the ant build to add metadata. Maybe this build step should be addressed first (so someone can optionally do it with ant if they want), just like maven and leave the thornier back compat issue for another issue. From this PDF it seems OSGI imposes its own backwards compatibility policy that conflicts with ours, and would be very difficult to maintain and detect if they were correct. I don't see why this would be useful at all: in basically every release binary compatibility is usually broken in some way (and even if its not technically broken, maybe a methods behavior changes or something like). Different lucene modules depend on each other and are only tested with the same version: today its not tested to use lucene-foobar-3.2.jar with a lucene-core-3.1.jar. So the versioning in that whitepaper doesn't make much sense: I think if we are going to put OSGI information in the packages we should simply bump the major version for every release: even bugfix releases. Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-4459: -- Affects Version/s: 3.6.1 4.0-BETA Fix Version/s: 5.0 4.1 TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.6.1, 4.0-BETA Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4459.patch There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469749#comment-13469749
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4399:
--
bq. I dont its a goal to check that they are really consistent? Really we can
remove this check.
I actually started to like it. :-) Having two different version numbers in the
headers of these files would mean that something went really wrong...
bq. This was a bug in this stuff before (LUCENE-3621).
I agree that codec names should never be shared, but I don't think this is a
problem for version numbers.
I started this discussion because I was surprised of the {{indexVersion ==
version}} test, but this is a detail, I think it is nice not to seek when it is
not necessary so I am +1 for this patch.
bq. we can deprecate/remove appending codec, we should just keep its test.
+1 for moving AppendingCodec from lucene-codecs to test-framework too
Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
-
Key: LUCENE-4399
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.1
Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch
In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name
should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave
Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new
Appending43Codec).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469750#comment-13469750 ] Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on LUCENE-3167: Jukka, these are all good point. I'm the maintainer of the Lucene OSGi bundles in Eclipse with quite a bit experience in OSGi-ifying libraries. There is a trade-off between satisfying all of the points and being pragmatic. Having real semantic versioning at the package level would be good for OSGi. However, for the time being, I simply use the main Lucene version for all package exports. That works today and should also be a first step here. Future work (like removing split packages and package level versioning) should be done as separate steps. Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-4459: -- Attachment: LUCENE-4459.patch I added a test improvement to verify the map size *before* the iterator, too. TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.6.1, 4.0-BETA Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4459.patch, LUCENE-4459.patch There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469757#comment-13469757
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4399:
-
{quote}
I started this discussion because I was surprised of the indexVersion ==
version test, but this is a detail, I think it is nice not to seek when it is
not necessary so I am +1 for this patch.
{quote}
Yeah, its a little funky, because of how there is only one seekDir, and this
is protected so Appending can subclass it (we can remove this when Appending
goes away).
So that one seekDir (used for both files) needs to know what should happen: I
suppose it could be 'boolean append' or something to be more clear.
I didnt want to have an assert though, or it might invoke Uwe's wrath!
Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
-
Key: LUCENE-4399
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.1
Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch
In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name
should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave
Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new
Appending43Codec).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-4459: - Assignee: Uwe Schindler TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.6.1, 4.0-BETA Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Uwe Schindler Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4459.patch, LUCENE-4459.patch There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469763#comment-13469763 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3167: - Wait: I'm saying I'm not sure these additional backwards compat things should be done at all. Changing things about the backwards compatibility policy to make development and releasing more difficult is serious and I'm not seeing the benefit here. A better approach would be to adapt the OSGI integration to work well with Lucene's existing backwards compatibility policy (http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility) instead of the other way around. Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469767#comment-13469767 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4459: --- Mike tested this with Zing VM and was not able to reproduce this anymore (which was easy with Zing). I will commit now. TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.6.1, 4.0-BETA Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Uwe Schindler Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4459.patch, LUCENE-4459.patch There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4459) TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-4459. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk and 4.x revision 1394291, 1394293 TestWeakIdentityMap.testConcurrentHashMap fails periodically in jenkins --- Key: LUCENE-4459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4459 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.6.1, 4.0-BETA Reporter: Robert Muir Assignee: Uwe Schindler Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4459.patch, LUCENE-4459.patch There is either a bug, a test bug, or a jvm bug. I dont care which one it is, but lets fix the intermittent fail or disable the test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469772#comment-13469772 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3167: - I count 280 packages in Lucene/Solr. Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469781#comment-13469781
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3167:
-
[~rcmuir] wrote:
{quote}
A better approach would be to adapt the OSGI integration to work well with
Lucene's existing backwards compatibility policy
(http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility) instead of the
other way around.
{quote}
What [~gunnar] says he's doing now seems close?:
{quote}
Having real semantic versioning at the package level would be good for OSGi.
However, for the time being, I simply use the main Lucene version for all
package exports. That works today and should also be a first step here.
{quote}
Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
--
Key: LUCENE-3167
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Environment: bndtools
Reporter: Luca Stancapiano
Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch,
lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch
We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no
more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need
to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation
of the OSGI bundle through Maven:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344
Bndtools could be used inside Ant
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469784#comment-13469784 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3167: - This conflicts with that PDF though... I guess I'm saying I disagree with that PDF completely :) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469786#comment-13469786 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3167: - I disagree with the whitepaper too, except the part where is says that semantic versioning is optional. Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3167) Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469789#comment-13469789 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3167: - Then we are back to my original suggestion above, that we start with just the ant integration as maven was done and don't try to change versioning nor back compat (this will be controversial, at least I will become really really annoying). Make lucene/solr a OSGI bundle through Ant -- Key: LUCENE-3167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Environment: bndtools Reporter: Luca Stancapiano Attachments: LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, LUCENE-3167.patch, lucene_trunk.patch, lucene_trunk.patch We need to make a bundle thriugh Ant, so the binary can be published and no more need the download of the sources. Actually to get a OSGI bundle we need to use maven tools and build the sources. Here the reference for the creation of the OSGI bundle through Maven: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344 Bndtools could be used inside Ant -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
StandardTokenizer generation from JFlex grammar
Hello,
I'm trying to generate the standard tokenizer again using the jflex
specification (StandardTokenizerImpl.jflex) but I'm not able to do so due to
some errors (I would like to create my own jflex file using the standard
tokenizer which is why I'm trying to first generate using that to get a hang
of things).
I'm using jflex 1.4.3 and I ran into the following error:
Error in file filename (line 64):
Syntax error.
HangulEx = (!(!\p{Script:Hangul}|!\p{WB:ALetter})) ({Format} |
{Extend})*
Also, I tried installing an eclipse plugin from
http://cup-lex-eclipse.sourceforge.net/ which I thought would provide
options similar to JavaCC (http://eclipse-javacc.sourceforge.net/) through
which we can generate classes within eclipse - but had a hard luck.
Any help would be very helpful.
Regards,
Phani.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/StandardTokenizer-generation-from-JFlex-grammar-tp4011939.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4226) Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-4226:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-4226.patch
Slightly modified patch in order not so seek when writing the stored fields
index.
Efficient compression of small to medium stored fields
--
Key: LUCENE-4226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core/index
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
Attachments: CompressionBenchmark.java, CompressionBenchmark.java,
LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch,
LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch, LUCENE-4226.patch,
SnappyCompressionAlgorithm.java
I've been doing some experiments with stored fields lately. It is very common
for an index with stored fields enabled to have most of its space used by the
.fdt index file. To prevent this .fdt file from growing too much, one option
is to compress stored fields. Although compression works rather well for
large fields, this is not the case for small fields and the compression ratio
can be very close to 100%, even with efficient compression algorithms.
In order to improve the compression ratio for small fields, I've written a
{{StoredFieldsFormat}} that compresses several documents in a single chunk of
data. To see how it behaves in terms of document deserialization speed and
compression ratio, I've run several tests with different index compression
strategies on 100,000 docs from Mike's 1K Wikipedia articles (title and text
were indexed and stored):
- no compression,
- docs compressed with deflate (compression level = 1),
- docs compressed with deflate (compression level = 9),
- docs compressed with Snappy,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with deflate (level = 1) and
chunks of 6 docs,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with deflate (level = 9) and
chunks of 6 docs,
- using the compressing {{StoredFieldsFormat}} with Snappy and chunks of 6
docs.
For those who don't know Snappy, it is compression algorithm from Google
which has very high compression ratios, but compresses and decompresses data
very quickly.
{noformat}
Format Compression ratio IndexReader.document time
uncompressed 100% 100%
doc/deflate 1 59% 616%
doc/deflate 9 58% 595%
doc/snappy80% 129%
index/deflate 1 49% 966%
index/deflate 9 46% 938%
index/snappy 65% 264%
{noformat}
(doc = doc-level compression, index = index-level compression)
I find it interesting because it allows to trade speed for space (with
deflate, the .fdt file shrinks by a factor of 2, much better than with
doc-level compression). One other interesting thing is that {{index/snappy}}
is almost as compact as {{doc/deflate}} while it is more than 2x faster at
retrieving documents from disk.
These tests have been done on a hot OS cache, which is the worst case for
compressed fields (one can expect better results for formats that have a high
compression ratio since they probably require fewer read/write operations
from disk).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-3760) Build packaging of complex contrib packages just plain does not work
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lance Norskog closed SOLR-3760. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 The Solr factories have all been moved into Lucene, and so the zig-zag dependency problem no longer exists. For the rest of the topic, some other time. Build packaging of complex contrib packages just plain does not work Key: SOLR-3760 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3760 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build Reporter: Lance Norskog Fix For: 4.0 The build system packages Lucene libraries in the Solr war, but they do not pack libraries required by the Lucene libraries. The UIMA and analysis-extras contrib packages have factories for the Lucene libraries. The net effect is that when solrconfig.xml include lib directives for dist/xxx-contribX-xxx.jar and solr/contrib/contribX/lib, this fails because the lucene analyzer file inside the solr war cannot find the library files in solr/contrib/contribX/lib because the classloader for the war does not find the libraries from the lib directives. Two alternative fixes are presented below. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4399) Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4399: Attachment: LUCENE-4399.patch A more thorough patch for trunk. (Needs javadocs and minor cleanups etc etc, but all backwards compat and such). I would deprecate this stuff in branch_4x still. I would also, in branch_4x, include my original fix on this issue for not including blocktree's versioning. this itself can also be backwards compat (its just an if statement). Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec - Key: LUCENE-4399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new Appending43Codec). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3921) Add decompose compound Japanese Katakana token capability to Kuromoji
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469934#comment-13469934 ] Lance Norskog commented on LUCENE-3921: --- I have discovered a similar problem with the Smart Chinese toolkit. Would the same approach work for both languages? Would it be worth solving this problem with a generic tool rather than language-specific? Add decompose compound Japanese Katakana token capability to Kuromoji - Key: LUCENE-3921 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3921 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement Components: modules/analysis Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA Environment: Cent OS 5, IPA Dictionary, Run with Search mdoe Reporter: Kazuaki Hiraga Labels: features Japanese morphological analyzer, Kuromoji doesn't have a capability to decompose every Japanese Katakana compound tokens to sub-tokens. It seems that some Katakana tokens can be decomposed, but it cannot be applied every Katakana compound tokens. For instance, トートバッグ(tote bag) and ショルダーバッグ don't decompose into トート バッグ and ショルダー バッグ although the IPA dictionary has バッグ in its entry. I would like to apply the decompose feature to every Katakana tokens if the sub-tokens are in the dictionary or add the capability to force apply the decompose feature to every Katakana tokens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3922) Add Japanese Kanji number normalization to Kuromoji
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13469936#comment-13469936 ] Lance Norskog commented on LUCENE-3922: --- Kazuaki, do have any comment on this fix? Add Japanese Kanji number normalization to Kuromoji --- Key: LUCENE-3922 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3922 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: New Feature Components: modules/analysis Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA Reporter: Kazuaki Hiraga Labels: features Attachments: LUCENE-3922.patch Japanese people use Kanji numerals instead of Arabic numerals for writing price, address and so on. i.e 12万4800円(124,800JPY), 二番町三ノ二(3-2 Nibancho) and 十二月(December). So, we would like to normalize those Kanji numerals to Arabic numerals (I don't think we need to have a capability to normalize to Kanji numerals). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1394317 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene: store/MockDirectoryWrapper.java store/MockIndexOutputWrapper.java util/ThrottledIndexOutput.java
LOL
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:55 PM, mikemcc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mikemccand
Date: Thu Oct 4 22:55:11 2012
New Revision: 1394317
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394317view=rev
Log:
bring back third bum: he seems to find bugs
Added:
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/ThrottledIndexOutput.java
- copied unchanged from r1392603,
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/ThrottledIndexOutput.java
Modified:
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockDirectoryWrapper.java
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockIndexOutputWrapper.java
Modified:
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockDirectoryWrapper.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockDirectoryWrapper.java?rev=1394317r1=1394316r2=1394317view=diff
==
---
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockDirectoryWrapper.java
(original)
+++
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockDirectoryWrapper.java
Thu Oct 4 22:55:11 2012
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWrit
import org.apache.lucene.index.NoDeletionPolicy;
import org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos;
import org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase;
+import org.apache.lucene.util.ThrottledIndexOutput;
import org.apache.lucene.util._TestUtil;
/**
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ public class MockDirectoryWrapper extend
private SetString openFilesForWrite = new HashSetString();
SetString openLocks = Collections.synchronizedSet(new HashSetString());
volatile boolean crashed;
+ private ThrottledIndexOutput throttledOutput;
private Throttling throttling = Throttling.SOMETIMES;
final AtomicInteger inputCloneCount = new AtomicInteger();
@@ -114,16 +116,22 @@ public class MockDirectoryWrapper extend
// called from different threads; else test failures may
// not be reproducible from the original seed
this.randomState = new Random(random.nextInt());
+this.throttledOutput = new ThrottledIndexOutput(ThrottledIndexOutput
+.mBitsToBytes(40 + randomState.nextInt(10)), 5 +
randomState.nextInt(5), null);
// force wrapping of lockfactory
this.lockFactory = new MockLockFactoryWrapper(this,
delegate.getLockFactory());
-// NOTE: we init rateLimiter always but we only
-// sometimes use it (by default) in createOutput:
-double maxMBPerSec = 10 + 5*(randomState.nextDouble()-0.5);
-if (LuceneTestCase.VERBOSE) {
- System.out.println(MockDirectoryWrapper: will rate limit output IO to
+ maxMBPerSec + MB/sec);
+// 2% of the time use rate limiter
+if (randomState.nextInt(50) == 17) {
+ // Use RateLimiter
+ double maxMBPerSec = 10 + 5*(randomState.nextDouble()-0.5);
+ if (LuceneTestCase.VERBOSE) {
+System.out.println(MockDirectoryWrapper: will rate limit output IO
to + maxMBPerSec + MB/sec);
+ }
+ rateLimiter = new RateLimiter(maxMBPerSec);
+} else {
+ rateLimiter = null;
}
-rateLimiter = new RateLimiter(maxMBPerSec);
init();
}
@@ -439,25 +447,22 @@ public class MockDirectoryWrapper extend
ramdir.fileMap.put(name, file);
}
}
-
-RateLimiter thisRateLimiter;
-
+
+//System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + : MDW: create
+ name);
+IndexOutput io = new MockIndexOutputWrapper(this,
delegate.createOutput(name, LuceneTestCase.newIOContext(randomState,
context)), name);
+addFileHandle(io, name, Handle.Output);
+openFilesForWrite.add(name);
+
// throttling REALLY slows down tests, so don't do it very often for
SOMETIMES.
if (throttling == Throttling.ALWAYS ||
(throttling == Throttling.SOMETIMES rateLimiter == null
randomState.nextInt(50) == 0)) {
if (LuceneTestCase.VERBOSE) {
System.out.println(MockDirectoryWrapper: throttling indexOutput);
}
- thisRateLimiter = rateLimiter;
+ return throttledOutput.newFromDelegate(io);
} else {
- thisRateLimiter = null;
+ return io;
}
-
-//System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + : MDW: create
+ name);
-IndexOutput io = new MockIndexOutputWrapper(this,
delegate.createOutput(name, LuceneTestCase.newIOContext(randomState,
context)), name, thisRateLimiter);
-addFileHandle(io, name, Handle.Output);
-openFilesForWrite.add(name);
-return io;
}
private static enum Handle {
Modified:
lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MockIndexOutputWrapper.java
URL:
Build failed in Jenkins: lucene40-beaster #1327
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/1327/ -- [...truncated 2433 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocsAndPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.38s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.18s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocTermOrds [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.14s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.32s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.17s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.29s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.32s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.12s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitPositions [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.26s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanationsOfNonMatches [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 22 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestNearSpansOrdered [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.11s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestSpecialOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSumDocFreq [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.24s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.07s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.08s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDocIdSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSubScorerFreqs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanOr [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.93s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestConstantScoreQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.07s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestDirectory [junit4:junit4]
Jenkins build is back to normal : lucene40-beaster #1328
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/lucene40-beaster/1328/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (32bit/jdk1.6.0_35) - Build # 1044 - Failure!
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows/1044/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.6.0_35 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 26481 lines...] BUILD FAILED C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\build.xml:245: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\build.xml:551: Unable to delete file C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\lucene\build\analysis\common\lucene-analyzers-common-4.1-SNAPSHOT.jar Total time: 60 minutes 16 seconds Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure Recording test results Description set: Java: 32bit/jdk1.6.0_35 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC Email was triggered for: Failure Sending email for trigger: Failure - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: slow-io-beasting #1049
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/1049/ -- [...truncated 902 lines...] [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexableField [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.14s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocTermOrds [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.23s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiPhraseQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.25s, 16 tests, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarity2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.20s, 7 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.28s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiLevelSkipList [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.13s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.14s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.TestExternalCodecs [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.12s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.13s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.TestAllFilesHaveCodecHeader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.70s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2 [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.08s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 11 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.11s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.16s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryTerms [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.05s, 10 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.31s, 6 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexFileDeleter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSetOnce [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSetupTeardownChaining [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSameRandomnessLocalePassedOrNot [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsCollector [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.27s, 8 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s J2 | Test2BPostings.test [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 1 test, 1 skipped [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFilterAtomicReader [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.22s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 4 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDateFilter [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites [junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced [junit4:junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositionIncrement [junit4:junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDateTools [junit4:junit4] Completed on J2 in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4:junit4] [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestDirectory [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.03s J0 | TestDirectory.testThreadSafety [junit4:junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test
Jenkins build is back to normal : slow-io-beasting #1050
See http://sierranevada.servebeer.com:8080/job/slow-io-beasting/1050/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
