Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Anshum Gupta]

I've backported and pushed SOLR-13285 to branch_8_0 (
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=2ae4746). Ran all
tests and precommit.

Good luck, and hopefully this is it! Thank you once again for the patience,
Jim.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:59 AM jim ferenczi  wrote:

> Thanks !
>
> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:58, Anshum Gupta  a
> écrit :
>
>> I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit
>> as soon as the tests pass.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a
>>> volunteer for the backport or should I do it ?
>>>
>>> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
>>>
 Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
 it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?

 @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
 getting 7.7.1 out.

 On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta 
 wrote:
 >
 > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
 understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
 SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
 We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
 not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
 would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
 >
 > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of
 the RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
 >
 > Anshum
 >
 > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
 ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
 >>
 >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a
 8.0.1 (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
 >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I
 also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the
 intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have
 (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility
 indexes etc).
 >>
 >>
 >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
 tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
 >>>
 >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of
 respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from
 what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use
 Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
 >>>
 >>> -0
 >>>
 >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
 >>> 
 wrote:
 
  +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
 
  > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand 
 wrote:
  >
  > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
  >
  > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi 
 wrote:
  >>
  >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
  >>
  >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
  >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
  >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
  >>
  >> Here’s my +1
  >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
  >
  >
  >
  > --
  > Adrien
  >
  >
 -
  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
  >
 
 
 
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
 


 --
 Adrien

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[jim ferenczi]

Thanks !

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:58, Anshum Gupta  a écrit :

> I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit as
> soon as the tests pass.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi 
> wrote:
>
>> I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a
>> volunteer for the backport or should I do it ?
>>
>> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
>>
>>> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
>>> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>>>
>>> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
>>> getting 7.7.1 out.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
>>> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
>>> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
>>> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
>>> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
>>> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
>>> >
>>> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of
>>> the RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>>> >
>>> > Anshum
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a
>>> 8.0.1 (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>>> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I
>>> also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the
>>> intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have
>>> (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility
>>> indexes etc).
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>>> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of
>>> respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from
>>> what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use
>>> Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -0
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
>>> >>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>> 
>>>  > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand 
>>> wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>>  >
>>>  > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi 
>>> wrote:
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>>  >>
>>>  >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>  >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>  >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Here’s my +1
>>>  >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > --
>>>  > Adrien
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>> -
>>>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>  >
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrien
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Anshum Gupta]

I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit as
soon as the tests pass.


On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi  wrote:

> I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a
> volunteer for the backport or should I do it ?
>
> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
>
>> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
>> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>>
>> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
>> getting 7.7.1 out.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
>> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
>> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
>> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
>> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
>> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
>> >
>> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the
>> RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>> >
>> > Anshum
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
>> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I
>> also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the
>> intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have
>> (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility
>> indexes etc).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of
>> respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from
>> what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use
>> Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
>> >>>
>> >>> -0
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
>> >>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>> 
>>  > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand 
>> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>  >
>>  > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi 
>> wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>  >>
>>  >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>  >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>  >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>  >>
>>  >> Here’s my +1
>>  >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > --
>>  > Adrien
>>  >
>>  >
>> -
>>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>  >
>> 
>> 
>>  -
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[jim ferenczi]

I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a volunteer
for the backport or should I do it ?

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand  a écrit :

> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>
> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
> getting 7.7.1 out.
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta 
> wrote:
> >
> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
> >
> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the
> RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
> >
> > Anshum
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
> etc).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
> and the fix is already available.
> >>>
> >>> -0
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
> >>> 
> wrote:
> 
>  +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
> 
>  > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
>  >
>  > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>  >
>  > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi 
> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>  >>
>  >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>  >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>  >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>  >>
>  >> Here’s my +1
>  >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Adrien
>  >
>  >
> -
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>  >
> 
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Uwe Schindler]

Hi,

 

I did the same tests like last time. Here the results:

 

https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/17/console

SUCCESS! [2:37:21.770467]

 

The testing was done with Java 8 and Java 9 (this is why it took longer).

 

I also checked Changes.txt, looks fine!

 

I also checked the ZIP files of Lucene and Solr. Lucene looks as usual, 
MIGRATE.txt is also fine – thanks for adding recent information! JAR files also 
look fine, compiled with correct version of Java and patches multi-release 
class files are there.

 

Apache Solr was unzipped and quickly tested on Windows: Startup with Java 8 and 
Java 11 worked without any problems from a directory with whitespace in path. I 
was able to do a HTTP/2 request with CURL (non-TLS) on both O/S (as ALPN is not 
available without TLS, the curl client needed to upgrade the request, so you 
see “101 Switching Protocols”):

 

Uwe Schindler@VEGA:~ > curl -I --http2 localhost:8983/solr/

HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols

 

HTTP/2 200

x-frame-options: DENY

content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8

content-length: 14662

 

So, it worked. In the webbrowser it did not use HTTP/2, as browsers require SSL 
and ALPN for that (by default).

 

Next I enabled TLS support by creating a keystore. This time it was possible to 
start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 – bug fixed. With Solr running in Java 8, CURL 
was only able to do a HTTP/1.1 request because ALPN told this to the curl 
client:

 

Uwe Schindler@VEGA:~ > curl -k -I --http2 https://localhost:8983/solr/

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

X-Frame-Options: DENY

Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8

Content-Length: 14662

 

With Java 11, my curl test worked with HTTP/2, this time no protocol switch 
needed as ALPN is active:

 

Uwe Schindler@VEGA:~ > curl -k -I --http2 https://localhost:8983/solr/

HTTP/2 200

x-frame-options: DENY

content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8

content-length: 14662

 

I also checked in Chrome browser, this time it uses HTTP/2 to communicate with 
the admin interface. Fine!

 

+1 to release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 (RC3).

 

Uwe

 

 

-

Uwe Schindler

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/> 

eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

 

From: jim ferenczi  
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:53 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

 

Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0

The artifacts can be downloaded from  
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e>
 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py  
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e>
 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e


Here’s my +1

SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Furkan KAMACI]

Hi,

Sorry, but I also think that we should respin it if we can instead of
running a release of 8.0.1.

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Anshum Gupta  wrote:

> Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely understand
> the frustration caused by such delays but I think that SOLR-13285 is
> something that really breaks Solr in a major version release. We can always
> have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would not be a good
> thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it would cause
> issues for anyone using enum fields.
>
> I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the RM
> but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
>> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
>> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
>> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
>> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
>> etc).
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
>>> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
>>> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
>>> and the fix is already available.
>>>
>>> -0
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]

 > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
 >
 > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
 >
 > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi 
 wrote:
 >>
 >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
 >>
 >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
 >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
 >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
 >>
 >> Here’s my +1
 >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > Adrien
 >
 > -
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
 >


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Adrien Grand]

Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?

@Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
getting 7.7.1 out.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta  wrote:
>
> Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely understand the 
> frustration caused by such delays but I think that SOLR-13285 is something 
> that really breaks Solr in a major version release. We can always have a 
> 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would not be a good thing to 
> offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it would cause issues for 
> anyone using enum fields.
>
> I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the RM 
> but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>  wrote:
>>
>> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1 (with 
>> SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also 
>> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate 
>> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in 
>> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes 
>> etc).
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and 
>>> I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can 
>>> see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and 
>>> the fix is already available.
>>>
>>> -0
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen  
>>> wrote:

 +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]

 > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
 >
 > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
 >
 > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi  wrote:
 >>
 >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
 >>
 >> The artifacts can be downloaded from 
 >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
 >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
 >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py 
 >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
 >>
 >> Here’s my +1
 >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > Adrien
 >
 > -
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
 >


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



--
Adrien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Anshum Gupta]

Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely understand
the frustration caused by such delays but I think that SOLR-13285 is
something that really breaks Solr in a major version release. We can always
have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would not be a good
thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it would cause
issues for anyone using enum fields.

I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the RM
but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.

Anshum

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
> etc).
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
>> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
>> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
>> and the fix is already available.
>>
>> -0
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>>
>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi  wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>> >>
>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>> >>
>>> >> Here’s my +1
>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Adrien
>>> >
>>> > -
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Ishan Chattopadhyaya]

In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
(with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
@Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
etc).


On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
wrote:

> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and
> I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can
> see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and
> the fix is already available.
>
> -0
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>
>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> >>
>> >> Here’s my +1
>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Adrien
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Tomás Fernández Löbbe]

I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and
I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can
see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and
the fix is already available.

-0

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen 
wrote:

> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>
> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> >
> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi  wrote:
> >>
> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
> >>
> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >>
> >> Here’s my +1
> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Nhat Nguyen]

+1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]

> On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> 
> +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
> 
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi  wrote:
>> 
>> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>> 
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> 
>> Here’s my +1
>> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adrien
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Adrien Grand]

+1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi  wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>
> Here’s my +1
> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]



-- 
Adrien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Adrien Grand]

It's not clear whether you are only asking for a backport or also for a respin.

I'm reluctant to respin: we built the first release candidate more
than 3 week ago now and have had to postpone it since then because of
late bugs. This is asking too much to the release manager in my
opinion. I am +1 to backport this change so that it makes it to 8.0.1,
or 8.0 if we decide to respin for another bug, but I think it's time
to raise the bar in terms of what bugs should be considered blockers
for 8.0.


On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:51 PM Noble Paul  wrote:
>
> I would like to backport SOLR-13285
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:53 AM jim ferenczi  wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from 
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py 
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >
> > Here’s my +1
> > SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>
>
>
> --
> -
> Noble Paul
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>


--
Adrien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[Noble Paul]

I would like to backport SOLR-13285

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:53 AM jim ferenczi  wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>
> Here’s my +1
> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]



-- 
-
Noble Paul

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

[jim ferenczi]

Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0

The artifacts can be downloaded from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
*https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
*

Here’s my +1
SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]