Re: Unrelated Features within Data at Solr

2014-05-22 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch 
Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just
skips processing such requests?

Regards,
   Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi;

 As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can either use
 it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like:

 {add:{
 doc:{id:change.me,title:change.me},boost:1.0,overwrite:true,commitWithin:1000}}

 However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be
 permitted within data to index.

 I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops url
 parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin).
 However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a meta
 data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize Solr.

 What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something like
 that within data as meta data?

 Thanks;
 Furkan KAMACI

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Unrelated Features within Data at Solr

2014-05-22 Thread Furkan KAMACI 
By the way, I think that I can drop that parameter within a custom
UpdateRequestProcessor?


2014-05-22 17:32 GMT+03:00 Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com:

 Hi Alexandre;

 Actually I do not want to skip them. I just want to drop commitWithin
 parameter. It seems that I have to customize Solr for it. I think that it
 would be nice if commitWithin had been only query parameter instead of
 sending such kind of information within data too.

 Thanks;
 Furkan KAMACI


 2014-05-22 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com:

 Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just
 skips processing such requests?

 Regards,
Alex.
 Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
 Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr
 proficiency


 On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi;
 
  As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can
 either use
  it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like:
 
  {add:{
  doc:{id:change.me,title:change.me
 },boost:1.0,overwrite:true,commitWithin:1000}}
 
  However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be
  permitted within data to index.
 
  I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops
 url
  parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin).
  However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a
 meta
  data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize
 Solr.
 
  What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something
 like
  that within data as meta data?
 
  Thanks;
  Furkan KAMACI

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Unrelated Features within Data at Solr

2014-05-22 Thread Furkan KAMACI 
Hi Alexandre;

Actually I do not want to skip them. I just want to drop commitWithin
parameter. It seems that I have to customize Solr for it. I think that it
would be nice if commitWithin had been only query parameter instead of
sending such kind of information within data too.

Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI


2014-05-22 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com:

 Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just
 skips processing such requests?

 Regards,
Alex.
 Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
 Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr
 proficiency


 On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi;
 
  As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can either
 use
  it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like:
 
  {add:{
  doc:{id:change.me,title:change.me
 },boost:1.0,overwrite:true,commitWithin:1000}}
 
  However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be
  permitted within data to index.
 
  I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops
 url
  parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin).
  However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a meta
  data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize
 Solr.
 
  What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something
 like
  that within data as meta data?
 
  Thanks;
  Furkan KAMACI

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Unrelated Features within Data at Solr

2014-05-22 Thread Jack Krupansky 
To be clear, the commitWithin parameter is not within the “data” – an update 
stream consists of a sequence of “commands”, such as “add”, “delete”, “commit”, 
and “optimize”, while the “data” is contained within a “doc” element. The 
“commitWithin” parameter is specified for the “command”, not the “data”/”doc”.

-- Jack Krupansky

From: Furkan KAMACI 
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Unrelated Features within Data at Solr

Hi Alexandre; 

Actually I do not want to skip them. I just want to drop commitWithin 
parameter. It seems that I have to customize Solr for it. I think that it would 
be nice if commitWithin had been only query parameter instead of sending such 
kind of information within data too.

Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI



2014-05-22 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com:

  Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just
  skips processing such requests?

  Regards,
 Alex.
  Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
  Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr 
proficiency



  On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
   As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can either use
   it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like:
  
   {add:{
   
doc:{id:change.me,title:change.me},boost:1.0,overwrite:true,commitWithin:1000}}
  
   However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be
   permitted within data to index.
  
   I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops url
   parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin).
   However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a meta
   data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize Solr.
  
   What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something like
   that within data as meta data?
  
   Thanks;
   Furkan KAMACI


  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org