Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
I would rather not rebuild for L-2996. This issue has a known workaround. As for the sources issue that Andi brought up, it never effected 3.1 b/c it doesn't have the validation stuff. I'd like to stick w/ the artifacts we have. On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > If you're talking about LUCENE-2996, then note that I haven't checked in the > code yet. If you're going to rebuild the artifacts off of > branches/lucene_solr_3_1, I can check in the code there now. > > Shai > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's > > addIndexes() fix, too? > > > > 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my > question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this > but trunk and branch_3x are broken. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
RE: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
OK, sorry, I misunderstood the thread. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:05 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ? > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's > > addIndexes() fix, too? > > > > 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my > question... > it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this but trunk and > branch_3x are broken. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
If you're talking about LUCENE-2996, then note that I haven't checked in the code yet. If you're going to rebuild the artifacts off of branches/lucene_solr_3_1, I can check in the code there now. Shai On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's > > addIndexes() fix, too? > > > > 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my > question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this > but trunk and branch_3x are broken. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's > addIndexes() fix, too? > 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this but trunk and branch_3x are broken. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Hi, If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's addIndexes() fix, too? Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:51 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Cc: Andi Vajda > Subject: Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ? > > I don't think it is lost, it's likely my mistake in adding a top level common-build > for the validation stuff. We can change it out. > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > > > the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch? > > > > how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like > > that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and > > have to be re-done. > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be > >> conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only. > >> > >> If I check out > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene > >> I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene > >> one depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well. > >> > >> Is this intentional or an oversight ? > >> > >> Andi.. > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For > >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
I don't think it is lost, it's likely my mistake in adding a top level common-build for the validation stuff. We can change it out. On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch? > > how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like > that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and > have to be re-done. > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be >> conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only. >> >> If I check out >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene >> I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one >> depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well. >> >> Is this intentional or an oversight ? >> >> Andi.. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch? how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and have to be re-done. On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be > conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only. > > If I check out > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene > I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one > depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well. > > Is this intentional or an oversight ? > > Andi.. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Hi, It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only. If I check out http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well. Is this intentional or an oversight ? Andi.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
