Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Quick reminder for the next release:
It is important that at least one set of eyes examine the licensing aspects
of the release. This includes running RAT, making sure that bigs and bobs
are named accurately and that the NOTICE and LICENSE files are correct.
We should have different people check different things next time.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it
looks
good to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
testing
the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with
this
release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests
locally,
I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the
artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the
signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel
p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks good
to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing the
staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
+1 from non-PMC :)
iPhone'd
On Apr 11, 2015, at 12:25, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com wrote:
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
good to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com wrote:
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
good to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
testing the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am
happy with this release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally, I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Reminder, we are still in code freeze; please do not push anything to
master until the release is final.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks everyone. We have had 5 +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it
looks
good to me
+1 (binding)
On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote:
After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and
testing
the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with
this
release.
+1 (binding)
On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests
locally,
I
am fine with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
{binary,source}
x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the
artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the
signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel
p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead
of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi
suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC
+1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Checking the past releases, the artifacts names have always been
'mahout-distribution-*'. We could change that to
'apache-mahout-distribution-*' for future releases.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of
my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard
work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Ah... forgot this.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on {binary,source} x
{zip,tar} + pom. All were correct.
One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
doesn't include apache. Not sure that is a hard requirement, but it
seems a good thing to do.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the
release to pass.
Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
Rest: Please test the artifacts.
Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
Regards,
Suneel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will
require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Running on EMR now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com
wrote:
I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the
artifacts
buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my
local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly
from
the artifacts.
Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1
votes
for the candidate release to pass.
Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work
over
the past few weeks.
Regards,
Suneel
On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/ The Voting for this ends on tomorrow. Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for the release to pass. Grant, Ted: Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures. Rest: Please test the artifacts. Thanks to all the contributors and committers. Regards, Suneel On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com wrote: Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro. Will require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote. On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote: Running on EMR now. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel p...@occamsmachete.com wrote: I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified the artifacts buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo instead of my local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved correctly from the artifacts. Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi suneel.mar...@gmail.com wrote: Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/ The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast 3 PMC +1 votes for the candidate release to pass. Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their hard work over the past few weeks. Regards, Suneel On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
