Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-24 Thread Chad Smith
On 11/22/05, Benjamin Horst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Count me a skeptic. The article is thin on detail.

 If I were to guess, I'd say they are following their old vaporware
 strategy: announce early to hobble the mindshare growth of a
 competitor, and then never deliver. The article states it will be at
 least 18 months before this is released! And, who is ECMA anyway?


I'm not sure who ECMA is, but this webpage might help:

http://www.ecma-international.org/

Quote:

Since 1961 and continuing in full force today, *Ecma
International*facilitates the timely creation of a wide range of
global Information and
Communications Technology (ICT) and Consumer Electronics (CE) standards

--

MS has submitted the format to ISO, too.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2189

Quote:

Microsoft is looking to establish its Office XML Reference Schema (the new
file format for it's Office productivity suite) as an International
Organization of Standardization (ISO) ratified standard

--

And from a blog of a developer of the Office XML format, hosted on MSDN.com

http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/11/21/495466.aspx

Quote:

Today we are making a really important announcement about our XML formats.
We are going to bring the Microsoft Office Open XML formats to a standards
body with the intention of eventually making the formats an ISO standard.

--

Another article about the standardization move:

http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2005/11/22/221106-microsoft-to-apply-for-standardization-of-office-formats/

Quote:

After their document formats are recognized as an ECMA standard, the company
plans to pursue standardization at ISO, the International Organization for
Standardization.

--

HTH!

What do you all think about the move, if it's real, that is?

- Chad Smith
http://www.gimpshop.net/
Because everyone loves free software!


Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-24 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Hello Laurent, hello John,

Laurent Godard wrote:

 is that still conditional
 reading rapidely

 ... The move is being supported by a number of organisations
 including Apple Computer, Barclays Capital, BP, _Intel_ and Toshiba. ...

 regarding

 http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2005/index.html
 premium sponsors

 huh. Something i do not catch

Well, perhaps we should ask the question to our good friend Daneese
Cooper. We may not have convinced her to help us that much at her dinner
finally...
Without kidding: Intel is a big compay and they may have gotten some
direct threats by MS on the ODF topic, who knows.

Best,
Charles.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-23 Thread Laurent Godard

Hi John

John McCreesh a écrit :

The FT has broken the embargo:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/e9f5c0f8-5ab7-11da-8628-779e2340.html


is that still conditional
reading rapidely

... The move is being supported by a number of organisations including 
Apple Computer, Barclays Capital, BP, _Intel_ and Toshiba. ...


regarding

http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2005/index.html
premium sponsors

huh. Something i do not catch

Laurent


--
Laurent Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org
Indesko  http://www.indesko.com
Nuxeo CPS  http://www.nuxeo.com - http://www.cps-project.org
Livre Programmation OpenOffice.org, Eyrolles 2004

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-23 Thread Benjamin Horst

Count me a skeptic. The article is thin on detail.

If I were to guess, I'd say they are following their old vaporware 
strategy: announce early to hobble the mindshare growth of a 
competitor, and then never deliver. The article states it will be at 
least 18 months before this is released! And, who is ECMA anyway?


Microsoft will submit its Office file formats to Ecma International, 
the standards body, which will develop the documentation and make it 
available to the industry. The move is being supported by a number of 
organisations including Apple Computer, Barclays Capital, BP, Intel and 
Toshiba.


Within about 18 months, customers, competitors and developers should be 
able to download detailed files from Ecma on how to create a Microsoft 
Word, Powerpoint or Excel document.


On Nov 21, 2005, at 3:33 PM, John McCreesh wrote:


The FT has broken the embargo:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/e9f5c0f8-5ab7-11da-8628-779e2340.html

John

On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 18:47 +, John McCreesh wrote:
Just heard a rumour from a journalist reading an embargoed press 
release

that Microsoft will announce an XML file format for Office which they
will submit to ISO as an open-standard. The journalist claimed it 
would

be announced at midnight CET.

The monopolist is on the defensive.
John




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---
The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org now available!
http://www.solidoffice.com/tinyguide/

Free Culture and Open Source:
www.solidoffice.com


Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-21 Thread Chad Smith
On 11/21/05, John McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just heard a rumour from a journalist reading an embargoed press release
 that Microsoft will announce an XML file format for Office which they
 will submit to ISO as an open-standard. The journalist claimed it would
 be announced at midnight CET.

 The monopolist is on the defensive.

 John



This is a good thing, though, right? I mean, people have been saying that if
MS would only support ODF, everything would be just fine. So if MS comes up
with an XML-based truly Open Standard (approved by ISO), then OOo could use
it, MSO could use it, KOffice could use it, AbiWord could use it,
WordPerfect could use it, etc. etc. etc. - and all would open 100% right, as
long as the people making the software read and followed the ISO-approved
Open Standard. Is that a correct statement? So why would it matter if ODF or
MSO-OpenXML, (or whatever it will be called) gets approved by ISO? If it's
open, it's open, right?

What could MS do that would make this a bad thing? That's what I'm trying to
get at.

- Chad Smith
http://www.gimpshop.net/
Because everyone loves free software!


Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-21 Thread Daniel Carrera

Chad Smith wrote:

What could MS do that would make this a bad thing?
That's what I'm trying to get at.


Even MS couldn't make this a bad thing (I don't think). It would be 
interesting to watch. Maybe they are feeling a little competition from 
OpenDocument after all...


Cheers,
Daniel.
--
 /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/  http://opendocumentfellowship.org
   /\/_/  No trees were harmed in the creation of this email.
   \/_/   However, a significant number of electrons were
   /  were severely inconvenienced.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-21 Thread Steven Shelton

Chad Smith wrote:


This is a good thing, though, right? I mean, people have been saying that if
MS would only support ODF, everything would be just fine. So if MS comes up
with an XML-based truly Open Standard (approved by ISO), then OOo could use
it, MSO could use it, KOffice could use it, AbiWord could use it,
WordPerfect could use it, etc. etc. etc. - and all would open 100% right, as
long as the people making the software read and followed the ISO-approved
Open Standard. Is that a correct statement? So why would it matter if ODF or
MSO-OpenXML, (or whatever it will be called) gets approved by ISO? If it's
open, it's open, right?

What could MS do that would make this a bad thing? That's what I'm trying to
get at.



MS does not do truly open standards. Most likely, what MS is planning to 
do is submit their existing XML as an open standard and then, in their 
applications, utilize the open standard and then add proprietary 
information to it when the application saves. That way, MS Office can 
open everyone else's files reliably but nobody else can open MS Office 
files reliably, even though they are based on the open standard. It's 
the same game they played with HTML standards. Nothing new.


--
Steven Shelton
Twilight Media  Design
www.TwilightMD.com
www.GLOAMING.us
-=-=-
Energizer Bunny arrested, charged with battery.
-=-=-



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] Microsoft to announce open-standard XML file format support at midnight CET

2005-11-21 Thread J David Eisenberg
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Chad Smith wrote:

 On 11/21/05, John McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Just heard a rumour from a journalist reading an embargoed press release
  that Microsoft will announce an XML file format for Office which they
  will submit to ISO as an open-standard. The journalist claimed it would
  be announced at midnight CET.
 
  The monopolist is on the defensive.
 
  John
 
 
 
 This is a good thing, though, right? I mean, people have been saying that if
 MS would only support ODF, everything would be just fine. So if MS comes up
 with an XML-based truly Open Standard (approved by ISO), then OOo could use
 it, MSO could use it, KOffice could use it, AbiWord could use it,
 WordPerfect could use it, etc. etc. etc. - and all would open 100% right, as
 long as the people making the software read and followed the ISO-approved
 Open Standard. Is that a correct statement? So why would it matter if ODF or
 MSO-OpenXML, (or whatever it will be called) gets approved by ISO? If it's
 open, it's open, right?
 
 What could MS do that would make this a bad thing? That's what I'm trying to
 get at.

They could keep the proprietary, secret binary key as part of their 
specification.  Whether ISO would approve it with that key still intact is 
another question, but that would definitely put it in the category of bad 
thing for me.  YMMV.

 
 - Chad Smith
 http://www.gimpshop.net/
 Because everyone loves free software!
 

-- 
J. David Eisenberg  http://catcode.com/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]