Re: xdoc DTD - Do we already have a PUBLIC identifier?
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 19:12 +, Lukas Theussl wrote: No, there is none. The DTD is currently only available in SVN, it was added in the 1.10 version of the maven-1 xdoc plugin which is not released yet. As such, it is still work in progress, so I don't know if it's a good idea to publish it at this point. However, as far as I'm concerned, the xdoc-1.10 plugin could be released very soon, we will consider your demand as soon as it's done (please remind us if we forget, I know you are good at that! ;) ) ;-) I've created MPXDOC-192, please make sure to resolve it before releasing 1.10 Best regards Henning -Lukas Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, I finally was able to make heads and tails of the xdoc DTD as included in the maven 1 xdoc plugin (thanks a lot for this, Lukas Arnaud!) . To make XMLMind to automatically identify these files, we do need a DTD public identifier. Do you already have one? Googling for this didn't really help me here. If you don't have decided for an identifier, I'd like to propose: !DOCTYPE document PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0//EN http://www.apache.org/dtds/xdoc_1_0.dtd; as DTD identifier for the XDOC format. As I understand, we then must make this DTD visible at the designated location, which needs coordination with the infra people. However, putting it under www.apache.org means, that the mirror system will pick up these DTDs. Any opinions? If you agree, you can take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/EditXdocs to get my XMLMind hackery for actually editing xdocs (not just painfully writing them... :-) ). Best regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Engineering Social behaviour: Bavarians can be extremely egalitarian and folksy. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria Most Franconians do not like to be called Bavarians. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xdoc DTD - Do we already have a PUBLIC identifier?
Hi, getting XDOC out of the maven/velocity realm and making an official format would IMHO help its visibility tremendously. That's why I proposed to adopt it as -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0//EN and removed all the maven and velocity references from it. Having it online is good, having it at www.apache.org/dtds with an official location and version number (1.0) is IMHO much better. It would also avoid sneaking stuff in. ;-) (navbar...) Best regards Henning On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 22:25 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi, in fact it's not yet documented but the dtd is already online : http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/xdoc/maven-xdoc.dtd cheers arnaud On 3/31/06, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, there is none. The DTD is currently only available in SVN, it was added in the 1.10 version of the maven-1 xdoc plugin which is not released yet. As such, it is still work in progress, so I don't know if it's a good idea to publish it at this point. However, as far as I'm concerned, the xdoc-1.10 plugin could be released very soon, we will consider your demand as soon as it's done (please remind us if we forget, I know you are good at that! ;) ) -Lukas Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, I finally was able to make heads and tails of the xdoc DTD as included in the maven 1 xdoc plugin (thanks a lot for this, Lukas Arnaud!) . To make XMLMind to automatically identify these files, we do need a DTD public identifier. Do you already have one? Googling for this didn't really help me here. If you don't have decided for an identifier, I'd like to propose: !DOCTYPE document PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0//EN http://www.apache.org/dtds/xdoc_1_0.dtd; as DTD identifier for the XDOC format. As I understand, we then must make this DTD visible at the designated location, which needs coordination with the infra people. However, putting it under www.apache.org means, that the mirror system will pick up these DTDs. Any opinions? If you agree, you can take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/EditXdocs to get my XMLMind hackery for actually editing xdocs (not just painfully writing them... :-) ). Best regards Henning - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Engineering Social behaviour: Bavarians can be extremely egalitarian and folksy. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria Most Franconians do not like to be called Bavarians. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xdoc DTD - Do we already have a PUBLIC identifier?
Actually, the navbar is in there already... I tried to discuss the question of what an xdoc is once on the maven dev list [1] but didn't get too much feedback. I then adopted the definition of an xdoc as something that is transformed into a valid xhtml1-transitional by the xdoc plugin. This of course links it intimately to maven and the xdoc plugin (which is also reflected in the current versioning scheme - the dtd in svn is called maven-xdoc-1.10.dtd and I assumed that we would publish a new version with every xdoc plugin). I never thought of '... getting XDOC out of the maven/velocity realm and making an official format'. As for now, the only difference between an xdoc and an xhtml1-transitional is the addition of the elements section, subsection, escapeXml, source and navbar. Any comments welcome. -Lukas [1] http://www.nabble.com/What-is-an-xdoc--t370461.html#a1023611 Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, getting XDOC out of the maven/velocity realm and making an official format would IMHO help its visibility tremendously. That's why I proposed to adopt it as -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0//EN and removed all the maven and velocity references from it. Having it online is good, having it at www.apache.org/dtds with an official location and version number (1.0) is IMHO much better. It would also avoid sneaking stuff in. ;-) (navbar...) Best regards Henning - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xdoc DTD - Do we already have a PUBLIC identifier?
Hi, I finally was able to make heads and tails of the xdoc DTD as included in the maven 1 xdoc plugin (thanks a lot for this, Lukas Arnaud!) . To make XMLMind to automatically identify these files, we do need a DTD public identifier. Do you already have one? Googling for this didn't really help me here. If you don't have decided for an identifier, I'd like to propose: !DOCTYPE document PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0//EN http://www.apache.org/dtds/xdoc_1_0.dtd; as DTD identifier for the XDOC format. As I understand, we then must make this DTD visible at the designated location, which needs coordination with the infra people. However, putting it under www.apache.org means, that the mirror system will pick up these DTDs. Any opinions? If you agree, you can take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/EditXdocs to get my XMLMind hackery for actually editing xdocs (not just painfully writing them... :-) ). Best regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Engineering Social behaviour: Bavarians can be extremely egalitarian and folksy. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria Most Franconians do not like to be called Bavarians. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xdoc DTD - Do we already have a PUBLIC identifier?
No, there is none. The DTD is currently only available in SVN, it was added in the 1.10 version of the maven-1 xdoc plugin which is not released yet. As such, it is still work in progress, so I don't know if it's a good idea to publish it at this point. However, as far as I'm concerned, the xdoc-1.10 plugin could be released very soon, we will consider your demand as soon as it's done (please remind us if we forget, I know you are good at that! ;) ) -Lukas Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, I finally was able to make heads and tails of the xdoc DTD as included in the maven 1 xdoc plugin (thanks a lot for this, Lukas Arnaud!) . To make XMLMind to automatically identify these files, we do need a DTD public identifier. Do you already have one? Googling for this didn't really help me here. If you don't have decided for an identifier, I'd like to propose: !DOCTYPE document PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0//EN http://www.apache.org/dtds/xdoc_1_0.dtd; as DTD identifier for the XDOC format. As I understand, we then must make this DTD visible at the designated location, which needs coordination with the infra people. However, putting it under www.apache.org means, that the mirror system will pick up these DTDs. Any opinions? If you agree, you can take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/EditXdocs to get my XMLMind hackery for actually editing xdocs (not just painfully writing them... :-) ). Best regards Henning - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xdoc DTD - Do we already have a PUBLIC identifier?
Hi, in fact it's not yet documented but the dtd is already online : http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/xdoc/maven-xdoc.dtd cheers arnaud On 3/31/06, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, there is none. The DTD is currently only available in SVN, it was added in the 1.10 version of the maven-1 xdoc plugin which is not released yet. As such, it is still work in progress, so I don't know if it's a good idea to publish it at this point. However, as far as I'm concerned, the xdoc-1.10 plugin could be released very soon, we will consider your demand as soon as it's done (please remind us if we forget, I know you are good at that! ;) ) -Lukas Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, I finally was able to make heads and tails of the xdoc DTD as included in the maven 1 xdoc plugin (thanks a lot for this, Lukas Arnaud!) . To make XMLMind to automatically identify these files, we do need a DTD public identifier. Do you already have one? Googling for this didn't really help me here. If you don't have decided for an identifier, I'd like to propose: !DOCTYPE document PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD XDOC 1.0 //EN http://www.apache.org/dtds/xdoc_1_0.dtd; as DTD identifier for the XDOC format. As I understand, we then must make this DTD visible at the designated location, which needs coordination with the infra people. However, putting it under www.apache.org means, that the mirror system will pick up these DTDs. Any opinions? If you agree, you can take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/EditXdocs to get my XMLMind hackery for actually editing xdocs (not just painfully writing them... :-) ). Best regards Henning - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
