Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Emmanuel Lécharny]

Cutting the drama off, I think an explaination on what a release mean is 
important.


Because this is what we do at The ASF: we release softwares that is to 
be trusted by the world. And that requires some due diligenc:


"After such a vote, it is a formal offering of the ASF, backed by the 
full faith and credit" of the Foundation."


To clarify for devs/users who are not PMC members:

The process is heavy for PMC members. A binding +1 vote is not a mere 
appreciation of the release ('yeah! a new version!'), but a validation 
that it has been properly baked.


For those interested in the process, here are few valuable links:

* https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
* https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html
* https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html


Being heavy, it's likely we may drop some balls from time to time (not 
intentionally), and this process is evolving, so we need to keep us 
updated. This is never a finished work!


And please, don't shoot the messenger ;-)


Last, not least, I have to thanks *all* the voters (and all the people 
involved in this project), not only the PMC members, but also the 
committers and users: you are helping us going on! This is a community 
effort, and it's good to know that 17 years after having been promoted a 
Top Level Projet, MINA is still kicking !


On 13/09/2023 01:50, jgenen...@apache.org wrote:

Ok… say… answer coming off list… too much drama for dev@.

Jeff



On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote:

Hi!

Not sure it's about validating how others are validating a release...

Now, I'd like to remind every PMC members that in order to issue a +1, the 
following things has to be completed per [1]:

"Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all signed 
source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet all requirements of 
ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all cryptographic signatures, compile 
as provided, and test the result on their own platform."

Sure thing, it's a bit of work when 3 releases have been issued, and may be we 
should start three votes (especially of the required Java version is different 
for the voted releases, but this is not the case here).

FTR, when I vote a release (typically the lastest sshd release), here is what I 
do:
- I get the source package, check the sign and compile it, running the tests
- I also grab the git tag, compile it, and run the tests (the only difference 
is that I don't check the sig here)

Concerning the L&N files, I check they are present. However, we are dealing 
with mature project, and most of the releases are bug fix releases. From time to 
time, I check that all the required notices are present, and that we aren't missing 
any third party dependency.

The rat plugin protect us from releasing a file that does not contain the 
required header.


All in all, it's a pretty dull work, that takes me an hour per release.

I do think we need to automatize it at some point, and most certainly have to 
document the process - ideally speaking, we should add the process as an 
attached text in the release vote mail.

Please feel free to comment, if you think I'm missing something !

Emmanuel

[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

On 13/09/2023 00:19, Gary Gregory wrote:

I don't understand what Windows has to do with my question.
What did you do to validate the release candidate before voting +1?
Gary
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:11 PM mailto:jgenen...@apache.org>> wrote:
I don’t use Windows.
Jeff
 > On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory
mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >
 > You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all
three src or
 > tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
 >
 > Gary
 >
 >
 > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM mailto:jgenen...@apache.org>> wrote:
 >
 >> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot
of stuff
 >> lately.
 >>
 >> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
 >>
 >> Jeff
 >>
 >>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>>
 >> wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
 >>>
 >>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
 >>>
 >>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
  I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
  [INFO] ---
  [INFO]  T E S T S
  [INFO] ---
  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
  [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
elapsed:
 >> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
  [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
 >> ela

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[jgenender]

Ok… say… answer coming off list… too much drama for dev@.

Jeff


> On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Not sure it's about validating how others are validating a release...
> 
> Now, I'd like to remind every PMC members that in order to issue a +1, the 
> following things has to be completed per [1]:
> 
> "Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all 
> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet 
> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all 
> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their 
> own platform."
> 
> Sure thing, it's a bit of work when 3 releases have been issued, and may be 
> we should start three votes (especially of the required Java version is 
> different for the voted releases, but this is not the case here).
> 
> FTR, when I vote a release (typically the lastest sshd release), here is what 
> I do:
> - I get the source package, check the sign and compile it, running the tests
> - I also grab the git tag, compile it, and run the tests (the only difference 
> is that I don't check the sig here)
> 
> Concerning the L&N files, I check they are present. However, we are dealing 
> with mature project, and most of the releases are bug fix releases. From time 
> to time, I check that all the required notices are present, and that we 
> aren't missing any third party dependency.
> 
> The rat plugin protect us from releasing a file that does not contain the 
> required header.
> 
> 
> All in all, it's a pretty dull work, that takes me an hour per release.
> 
> I do think we need to automatize it at some point, and most certainly have to 
> document the process - ideally speaking, we should add the process as an 
> attached text in the release vote mail.
> 
> Please feel free to comment, if you think I'm missing something !
> 
> Emmanuel
> 
> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> 
> On 13/09/2023 00:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I don't understand what Windows has to do with my question.
>> What did you do to validate the release candidate before voting +1?
>> Gary
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:11 PM > > wrote:
>>I don’t use Windows.
>>Jeff
>> > On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory
>>mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all
>>three src or
>> > tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot
>>of stuff
>> >> lately.
>> >>
>> >> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
>> >>
>> >> Jeff
>> >>
>> >>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
>>mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>> >>>
>> >>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>> >>>
>> >>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>>  I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
>>  [INFO] ---
>>  [INFO]  T E S T S
>>  [INFO] ---
>>  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>>  [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
>>elapsed:
>> >> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>>  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>>  [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
>> >> elapsed: 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in
>>org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>>  [ERROR]
>>org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
>> >> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
>>  java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError:
>>java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>> at
>> >>
>>java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
>> at
>> >>
>>
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
>> at
>> >>
>>
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
>> at
>> >>
>>java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> >> Method)
>> at
>> >>
>>
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
>> at
>> >>
>>
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at
>>java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
>> at
>> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Emmanuel Lécharny]

Hi!

Not sure it's about validating how others are validating a release...

Now, I'd like to remind every PMC members that in order to issue a +1, 
the following things has to be completed per [1]:


"Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download 
all signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that 
they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, 
validate all cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the 
result on their own platform."


Sure thing, it's a bit of work when 3 releases have been issued, and may 
be we should start three votes (especially of the required Java version 
is different for the voted releases, but this is not the case here).


FTR, when I vote a release (typically the lastest sshd release), here is 
what I do:

- I get the source package, check the sign and compile it, running the tests
- I also grab the git tag, compile it, and run the tests (the only 
difference is that I don't check the sig here)


Concerning the L&N files, I check they are present. However, we are 
dealing with mature project, and most of the releases are bug fix 
releases. From time to time, I check that all the required notices are 
present, and that we aren't missing any third party dependency.


The rat plugin protect us from releasing a file that does not contain 
the required header.



All in all, it's a pretty dull work, that takes me an hour per release.

I do think we need to automatize it at some point, and most certainly 
have to document the process - ideally speaking, we should add the 
process as an attached text in the release vote mail.


Please feel free to comment, if you think I'm missing something !

Emmanuel

[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

On 13/09/2023 00:19, Gary Gregory wrote:

I don't understand what Windows has to do with my question.

What did you do to validate the release candidate before voting +1?

Gary

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:11 PM > wrote:


I don’t use Windows.

Jeff


 > On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory
mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >
 > You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all
three src or
 > tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
 >
 > Gary
 >
 >
 > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM mailto:jgenen...@apache.org>> wrote:
 >
 >> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot
of stuff
 >> lately.
 >>
 >> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
 >>
 >> Jeff
 >>
 >>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>>
 >> wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
 >>>
 >>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
 >>>
 >>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
  I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
  [INFO] ---
  [INFO]  T E S T S
  [INFO] ---
  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
  [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
elapsed:
 >> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
  [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
 >> elapsed: 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
  [ERROR]
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
 >> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
  java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError:
java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
         at
 >>
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
         at
 >>

org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
         at
 >>

org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
         at
 >>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
 >> Method)
         at
 >>

java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
         at
 >>

java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
         at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
         at
 >>

org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
         at
 >>

org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
         at
 >>

org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
         at
 >>

org.junit.interna

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Gary Gregory]

I don't understand what Windows has to do with my question.

What did you do to validate the release candidate before voting +1?

Gary

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:11 PM  wrote:

> I don’t use Windows.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> > On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory 
> wrote:
> >
> > You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all three src or
> > tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM  wrote:
> >
> >> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff
> >> lately.
> >>
> >> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
> >>>
> >>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
> >>>
> >>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>  I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
>  [INFO] ---
>  [INFO]  T E S T S
>  [INFO] ---
>  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>  [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> >> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>  [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>  [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> >> elapsed: 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>  [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
> >> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
>  java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError:
> java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
> at
> >>
> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
> at
> >> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> >> Method)
> at
> >>
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
> at
> >>
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at
> >>
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at
> >> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> at
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
>  Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
> at
> >> java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
> at
> >>
> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[jgenender]

I don’t use Windows.

Jeff


> On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory  wrote:
> 
> You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all three src or
> tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
> 
> Gary
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM  wrote:
> 
>> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff
>> lately.
>> 
>> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>>> 
>>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>>> 
>>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
 I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
 [INFO] ---
 [INFO]  T E S T S
 [INFO] ---
 [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
 [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
 [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
 [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
>> elapsed: 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
 [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
>> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
 java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
at
>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
at
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
at
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
at
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
at
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
 Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
at
>> java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
at
>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
at
>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
at
>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
... 30 more
 Using:
 Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
 Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
 Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program
>> Files

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Gary Gregory]

You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all three src or
tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?

Gary


On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM  wrote:

> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff
> lately.
>
> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
>
> Jeff
>
> > On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny 
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jeff & Gary.
> >
> > Is that for all the MINA versions?
> >
> > On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> >> I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
> >> [INFO] ---
> >> [INFO]  T E S T S
> >> [INFO] ---
> >> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
> >> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
> >> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed: 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
> >> [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
> >> java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
> >> at
> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
> >> at
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
> >> at
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
> >> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> >> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
> >> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> >> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
> >> Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
> >> at
> java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
> >> at
> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
> >> at
> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
> >> at
> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
> >> ... 30 more
> >> Using:
> >> Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
> >> Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
> >> Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program
> Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> >> OS name: "windows

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[jgenender]

Ok… I guess I was late :-)

Sorry!

Jeff


> On Sep 12, 2023, at 7:55 AM, jgenen...@apache.org wrote:
> 
> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff 
> lately.
> 
> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
> 
> Jeff
> 
>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>> 
>> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>> 
>> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>>> I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
>>> [INFO] ---
>>> [INFO]  T E S T S
>>> [INFO] ---
>>> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>>> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
>>> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>>> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
>>> 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>>> [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer -- Time 
>>> elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
>>> java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>>>at 
>>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
>>>at 
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
>>> Method)
>>>at 
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
>>>at 
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
>>>at 
>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>>>at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
>>>at 
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
>>> Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>>>at java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
>>>at 
>>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
>>>at 
>>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
>>>at 
>>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
>>>... 30 more
>>> Using:
>>> Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
>>> Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
>>> Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program 
>>> Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>> Gary
>>> On 2023/09

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[jgenender]

I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff lately.

If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.

Jeff

> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
> 
> Is that for all the MINA versions?
> 
> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>> I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
>> [INFO] ---
>> [INFO]  T E S T S
>> [INFO] ---
>> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.060 
>> s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
>> [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>> [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
>> 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
>> [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer -- Time 
>> elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
>> java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>> at 
>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
>> at 
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
>> at 
>> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
>> at 
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
>> Method)
>> at 
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
>> at 
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
>> at 
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
>> at 
>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>> at 
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
>> at 
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>> at 
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
>> at 
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
>> at 
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
>> at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
>> Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
>> at java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
>> at 
>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
>> at 
>> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
>> at 
>> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
>> ... 30 more
>> Using:
>> Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
>> Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
>> Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program 
>> Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>> Gary
>> On 2023/09/11 07:42:10 Jeff MAURY wrote:
>>> +1.
>>> 
>>> 2 remarks:
>>> 
>>>- Does not build with Java 17
>>>- Build is failing on Windows
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Gary Gregory]

I only tested 2.2.3 RC 1 on Windows with Java 17. My other test runs where
on macOS with Java 8.

Gary

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:29 AM Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote:

> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>
> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>
> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> > I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
> >
> > [INFO] ---
> > [INFO]  T E S T S
> > [INFO] ---
> > [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
> > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.060 s -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
> > [INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.404 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
> > [ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer --
> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
> > java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
> >  at
> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
> >  at
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
> >  at
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
> >  at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> >  at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
> >  at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >  at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> >  at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> >  at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> >  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> >  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> >  at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> >  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> >  at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
> > Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
> >  at
> java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
> >  at
> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
> >  at
> java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
> >  at
> java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
> >  ... 30 more
> >
> > Using:
> >
> > Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
> > Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
> > Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program
> Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> > OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On 2023/09/11 07:42:10 Jeff MAURY wrote:
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> 2 remarks:
> >>
> >> - Does not build with Java 17
> >> - Build is failing on

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Emmanuel Lécharny]

Never mind, got the same error.

In Java 17 a call to CharsetEncoder.encode() on an immutable buffer 
throws a CoderMalfunctionError, not a ReadOnlyBufferException.


The test has to be changed to reflect that. It does not change a thing 
for the release, it's still good to go.


Thanks!

On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:

I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:

[INFO] ---
[INFO]  T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.060 s 
-- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.404 s 
<<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
[ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer -- Time elapsed: 
0.005 s <<< ERROR!
java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
 at 
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
 at 
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
 at 
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
 at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
 at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
 at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
 at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
 at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
 at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
 at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
 at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
 at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
 at java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
 at 
java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
 at 
java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
 at 
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
 ... 30 more

Using:

Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program 
Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"

Gary

On 2023/09/11 07:42:10 Jeff MAURY wrote:

+1.

2 remarks:

- Does not build with Java 17
- Build is failing on Windows


On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet  wrote:


+1

Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny  a
écrit :


hi!

WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!


This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Emmanuel Lécharny]

Thanks Jeff & Gary.

Is that for all the MINA versions?

On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:

I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:

[INFO] ---
[INFO]  T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.060 s 
-- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.404 s 
<<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
[ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer -- Time elapsed: 
0.005 s <<< ERROR!
java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
 at 
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
 at 
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
 at 
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
 at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
 at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
 at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
 at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
 at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
 at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
 at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
 at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
 at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
 at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
 at java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
 at 
java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
 at 
java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
 at 
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
 ... 30 more

Using:

Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program 
Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"

Gary

On 2023/09/11 07:42:10 Jeff MAURY wrote:

+1.

2 remarks:

- Does not build with Java 17
- Build is failing on Windows


On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet  wrote:


+1

Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny  a
écrit :


hi!

WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!


This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25

Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
object



Temporary tags have been created (

Result, was: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Emmanuel Lécharny]

Hi!

I'm closing this vote with 4 bidning +1 votes and 2 non binding +1.

I'll push the packages and annoiunce the releases in the coming hours.

Many thanks !

On 11/09/2023 09:42, Jeff MAURY wrote:

+1.

2 remarks:

- Does not build with Java 17
- Build is failing on Windows


On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet  wrote:


+1

Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny  a
écrit :


hi!

WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!


This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25

Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
object



Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
approved) :

* MINA 2.2.3:



https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83

* MINA 2.1.8:



https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a

* MINA 2.0.25:



https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41





The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
* MINA 2.2.3:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
* MINA 2.1.8:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
* MINA 2.0.25:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087



The distributions are available for download on :
* MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25


Let us vote :
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3

[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8


[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org




--

Guillaume Nodet






--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Gary D. Gregory]

I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:

[INFO] ---
[INFO]  T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.060 s 
-- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.404 
s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest
[ERROR] org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer -- Time 
elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR!
java.nio.charset.CoderMalfunctionError: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
at 
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:587)
at 
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putString(AbstractIoBuffer.java:1798)
at 
org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferTest.testReadOnlyBuffer(IoBufferTest.java:1104)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
Caused by: java.nio.ReadOnlyBufferException
at java.base/java.nio.HeapByteBufferR.put(HeapByteBufferR.java:212)
at 
java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeBufferLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:238)
at 
java.base/sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1$Encoder.encodeLoop(ISO_8859_1.java:258)
at 
java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:585)
... 30 more

Using:

Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.4
Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program 
Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"

Gary

On 2023/09/11 07:42:10 Jeff MAURY wrote:
> +1.
> 
> 2 remarks:
> 
>- Does not build with Java 17
>- Build is failing on Windows
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet  wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny  a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > hi!
> > >
> > > WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
> > >
> > >
> > > This is a vote for a triple release:
> > > * MINA 2.2.3
> > > * MINA 2.1.8
> > > * MINA 2.0.25
> > >
> > > Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> > > DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
> > > DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
> > > object
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Temporary tags have been created (they 

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Jeff MAURY]

+1.

2 remarks:

   - Does not build with Java 17
   - Build is failing on Windows


On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet  wrote:

> +1
>
> Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny  a
> écrit :
>
> > hi!
> >
> > WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
> >
> >
> > This is a vote for a triple release:
> > * MINA 2.2.3
> > * MINA 2.1.8
> > * MINA 2.0.25
> >
> > Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> > DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
> > DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
> > object
> >
> >
> >
> > Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
> > approved) :
> >
> > * MINA 2.2.3:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
> > * MINA 2.1.8:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
> > * MINA 2.0.25:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
> > * MINA 2.2.3:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
> > * MINA 2.1.8:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
> > * MINA 2.0.25:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087
> >
> >
> >
> > The distributions are available for download on :
> > * MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
> > * MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
> > * MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25
> >
> >
> > Let us vote :
> > [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
> > [ ] ± | Abstain
> > [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3
> >
> > [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
> > [ ] ± | Abstain
> > [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
> > [ ] ± | Abstain
> > [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Cordialement,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.iktek.com
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> 
> Guillaume Nodet
>


-- 
"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually
working and scaling.
 - Bjarne Stroustrup

http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Guillaume Nodet]

+1

Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny  a
écrit :

> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
>
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
> DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
> object
>
>
>
> Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
> approved) :
>
> * MINA 2.2.3:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
> * MINA 2.1.8:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
> * MINA 2.0.25:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41
>
>
>
>
> The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
> * MINA 2.2.3:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
> * MINA 2.1.8:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
> * MINA 2.0.25:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087
>
>
>
> The distributions are available for download on :
> * MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25
>
>
> Let us vote :
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3
>
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
>
>
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>
>

-- 

Guillaume Nodet

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[jgenender]

+1

Jeff


> On Sep 6, 2023, at 9:29 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny  wrote:
> 
> hi!
> 
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
> 
> 
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
> 
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
> DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session object
> 
> 
> 
> Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
> approved) :
> 
> * MINA 2.2.3:
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
> * MINA 2.1.8:
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
> * MINA 2.0.25:
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
> * MINA 2.2.3:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
> * MINA 2.1.8:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
> * MINA 2.0.25:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087
> 
> 
> 
> The distributions are available for download on :
> * MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25
> 
> 
> Let us vote :
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3
> 
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Gary Gregory]

Non-binding +1 for all three. Tested each src zip file with 'mvn clear
verify' using:

Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.4/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_382, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk@8/1.8.0-382_1/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "13.5.1", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
Darwin  22.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.6.0: Wed Jul  5 22:21:56
PDT 2023; root:xnu-8796.141.3~6/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

Gary

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:30 PM Emmanuel Lecharny  wrote:
>
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
>
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
> DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session object
>
>
>
> Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
> approved) :
>
> * MINA 2.2.3:
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
> * MINA 2.1.8:
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
> * MINA 2.0.25:
> https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41
>
>
>
>
> The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
> * MINA 2.2.3:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
> * MINA 2.1.8:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
> * MINA 2.0.25:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087
>
>
>
> The distributions are available for download on :
> * MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25
>
>
> Let us vote :
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3
>
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8
>
>
> [ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
> [ ] ± | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Christoph John]

* MINA 2.2.3 +1
* MINA 2.1.8 +1
* MINA 2.0.25 +1

Thanks
Chris

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Lecharny 
Sent: 07 September 2023 05:30
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

hi!

WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!


This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25

Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision DIRMINA-1172:Multiple 
DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session object



Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
approved) :

* MINA 2.2.3:
https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
* MINA 2.1.8:
https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
* MINA 2.0.25:
https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41




The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
* MINA 2.2.3:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
* MINA 2.1.8:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
* MINA 2.0.25:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087



The distributions are available for download on :
* MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25


Let us vote :
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3

[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8


[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
http://www.iktek.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org For additional 
commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

[VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases

[Emmanuel Lecharny]

hi!

WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!


This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25

Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session object



Temporary tags have been created (they can be removed if the vote is not
approved) :

* MINA 2.2.3:
https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/906884d52990b4fce119c462791abf1a5b577a83
* MINA 2.1.8:
https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/c7f164cbeecedb4a4e32ba798e7cf435acdc471a
* MINA 2.0.25:
https://github.com/apache/mina/commit/38ca5a9eb01461a7212b3904ff5010d0364d2f41




The final artifacts are stored in a staging repository:
* MINA 2.2.3:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1086
* MINA 2.1.8:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1085
* MINA 2.0.25:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1087



The distributions are available for download on :
* MINA 2.2.3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/mina/2.0.25


Let us vote :
[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.3
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.3

[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.8
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.8


[ ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.25
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.25


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org