Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:39 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. Craig Thanks. Looking forward to it. Has any one ported Petstore 2.0 to Spring JPA and tomcat or Jetty? Craig, is there any thought on Shale and WebBeans? (Hope not to offend any one on this list) I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's, Trinidad's, Orchestra's, Seam's, WebBeans's, Spring's ... but other than that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use Shale features and WebBeans features together, since they are both built on top of JSF APIs. Craig Thanks for the insight. It may be useful to define how Shale positions itself to WebBeans, regardless of what implementation the user may decide to take. [1] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=299 BaTien Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Craig McClanahan schrieb: I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's, Trinidad's, Orchestra's, Seam's, WebBeans's, Spring's ... but other than that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use Shale features and WebBeans features together, since they are both built on top of JSF APIs. Btw. Craig, you might be happy to hear, that I started with some preliminary Orchestra/Shale integration two days ago. I have nothing to show off yet, because I still tinker around with things and trying to find myself around in both codebases, but so far things look pretty good. After three hours of reading the codebase and tinkering with it, I was able to fetch orchestra conversational beans within a defined Shale Dialog environment and have shale issuing the end conversation commands which trigger all the jpa and bean related cleanup in orchestra. Yesterday I managed to bind all conversational beans under one dialog to one persistencecontext. I am still a little bit unclear about some things, but things look very good for an integration bridge which is not too hard to configure. (so far it looks like a special shaledialog scope in spring should do the trick) If all goes well then Shale dialog will be the first high level conversation framework with an orchestra binding. Or the other way round the first framework orchestra prodides bindings for.
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On 6/28/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig McClanahan schrieb: I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's, Trinidad's, Orchestra's, Seam's, WebBeans's, Spring's ... but other than that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use Shale features and WebBeans features together, since they are both built on top of JSF APIs. Btw. Craig, you might be happy to hear, that I started with some preliminary Orchestra/Shale integration two days ago. I have nothing to show off yet, because I still tinker around with things and trying to find myself around in both codebases, but so far things look pretty good. Cool ... I just answered your first question on the Shale list, also. After three hours of reading the codebase and tinkering with it, I was able to fetch orchestra conversational beans within a defined Shale Dialog environment and have shale issuing the end conversation commands which trigger all the jpa and bean related cleanup in orchestra. Yesterday I managed to bind all conversational beans under one dialog to one persistencecontext. I am still a little bit unclear about some things, but things look very good for an integration bridge which is not too hard to configure. (so far it looks like a special shaledialog scope in spring should do the trick) That makes sense. If all goes well then Shale dialog will be the first high level conversation framework with an orchestra binding. Or the other way round the first framework orchestra prodides bindings for. Looking forward to seeing this in action :-). Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Craig wrote: Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Yepp ... sound nice ;-) Kito D. Mann wrote: I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has FacesGoodies [1] :-) . would be myfaces-orchestra-goodies, should be enough dissociation between FacesGoodies then, I hope so. And when I think about, this project is a mixture of just non asf license compatible code and, yea - for sure, some goodies possible due to direct connection to e.g. hibernate. I have a nice ActionListener which will close the conversation if a exception has been thrown and some database update has taken place ... definitely a goodie - I like it :-) - but requires some sort of Interceptor for hibernate. Ciao, Mario
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Mario, What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past, but was disappointed about speed and reachability. I had no problems with sourceforge for a long time when working on jsf-comp. Cagatay On 6/26/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig wrote: Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Yepp ... sound nice ;-) Kito D. Mann wrote: I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has FacesGoodies [1] :-) . would be myfaces-orchestra-goodies, should be enough dissociation between FacesGoodies then, I hope so. And when I think about, this project is a mixture of just non asf license compatible code and, yea - for sure, some goodies possible due to direct connection to e.g. hibernate. I have a nice ActionListener which will close the conversation if a exception has been thrown and some database update has taken place ... definitely a goodie - I like it :-) - but requires some sort of Interceptor for hibernate. Ciao, Mario
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Cagatay Civici wrote: Mario, What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past, but was disappointed about speed and reachability. I had no problems with sourceforge for a long time when working on jsf-comp. Ok, so lets sum up ... Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) ) Use the module name myfaces-orchestra-goodies. What do you think? Ciao, Mario
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Use the module name myfaces-orchestra-goodies. +1 go ahead ! :) What do you think? Ciao, Mario -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
+1, Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) ) Yeah they will, for example JSF ChartCreator uses JFreeChart which is LGPL;) Cagatay On 6/27/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use the module name myfaces-orchestra-goodies. +1 go ahead ! :) What do you think? Ciao, Mario -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. Craig Thanks. Looking forward to it. Has any one ported Petstore 2.0 to Spring JPA and tomcat or Jetty? Craig, is there any thought on Shale and WebBeans? (Hope not to offend any one on this list) BaTien Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Thanks. Looking forward to it. Has any one ported Petstore 2.0 to Spring JPA and tomcat or Jetty? not petstore, but CRUD code.google.com/p/facesgoodies Craig, is there any thought on Shale and WebBeans? (Hope not to offend any one on this list) BaTien Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:18 +, Gary VanMatre wrote: From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. I think that's a Facelets example. Where is the Clay love? :--) Wow ;-) It's even better. Please announce when it is up for testing. Thanks to the whole community effort. we need more than 24 hrs a day to catch up. BaTien Craig Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf g t; ; ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. Craig Thanks. Looking forward to it. Has any one ported Petstore 2.0 to Spring JPA and tomcat or Jetty? Craig, is there any thought on Shale and WebBeans? (Hope not to offend any one on this list) I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's, Trinidad's, Orchestra's, Seam's, WebBeans's, Spring's ... but other than that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use Shale features and WebBeans features together, since they are both built on top of JSF APIs. Craig [1] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=299 BaTien Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:18 +, Gary VanMatre wrote: From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. I think that's a Facelets example. Where is the Clay love? :--) Wow ;-) It's even better. Please announce when it is up for testing. Thanks to the whole community effort. we need more than 24 hrs a day to catch up. Gary's right ... it is indeed Facelets based. IIRC, Sean started this as an effort to show Shale and Facelets and Hibernate working together, but got to busy to finish it. As such, it's never going to be up for testing unless someone comes along who *does* want to work on it. I've got admin rights on shale-goodies, and won't make you wait multiple months to get commit access :-). Craig BaTien Craig Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf g t; ; ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) ) No problem with me to use Jsf-Comp
RE: Orchestra on code.google.com
I do what I can, be pointing it out, whenever a question pops up on something we have there... but you are right, more publicity makes sense... regards Alexander -Original Message- From: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:51 PM To: 'MyFaces Development' Subject: RE: Orchestra on code.google.com If you guys decide to use JSF comp, I suggest pushing them for a little better PR. No one really knows all of the goodies they have... ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * -Original Message- From: Andrew Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:50 PM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: Orchestra on code.google.com Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) ) No problem with me to use Jsf-Comp
RE: Orchestra on code.google.com
Of course we accept it... We put jsf-comp to live to have a haven for non-adf-compatible stuff. Better host it on such a side-project, than nowhere... module name is up to you. (Personally i think it is a little bit long, but the module-creator is in the driver seat). Just give me an info, when you decide upon it and tell me the module-name, than I will setup the file-delivery-package (seems that's about the only thing only admins can do). regards Alexander -Original Message- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:57 AM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: Orchestra on code.google.com Cagatay Civici wrote: Mario, What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past, but was disappointed about speed and reachability. I had no problems with sourceforge for a long time when working on jsf-comp. Ok, so lets sum up ... Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) ) Use the module name myfaces-orchestra-goodies. What do you think? Ciao, Mario
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Craig McClanahan schrieb: That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig Excellent suggestion Craig...
RE: Orchestra on code.google.com
I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has FacesGoodies [1] :-). [1] http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Werner Punz Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 3:49 AM To: dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: Re: Orchestra on code.google.com Craig McClanahan schrieb: That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig Excellent suggestion Craig...
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Kito D. Mann schrieb: I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has FacesGoodies [1] :-). [1] http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ Why not adding it to facesgoodies then?
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Hi! Kito D. Mann schrieb: I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has FacesGoodies [1] :-). [1] http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ Why not adding it to facesgoodies then? I understand facesgoodies as template for quickstarting an application. I'd opt for the project name myfaces-orchestra-extras if we think nonasf is too non standard. Ciao, Mario
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Hi Jesse! how about using jsf-comp.sf.net? Sure, why not, we can add a orchestra-(extras|nonasf) module. What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past, but was disappointed about speed and reachability. Ciao, Mario got initiated for that reason... and a few of the components are used... regards Alexander -Original Message- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:29 PM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Orchestra on code.google.com Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Mario Ivankovits Software Engineering OPS EDV VertriebsgesmbH A-1120 Wien, Michael-Bernhard-Gasse 10 Firmenbuch Nr.: FN51233v, Handelsgericht Wien Tel.: +43-1-8938810; Fax: +43-1-8938810/3700 http://www.ops.co.at E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: mario_ivankovits
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Perhaps this has been covered already, but does it have binary deps on MyFaces? Or just the JSF API? If Orchstra has no dep on the MyFaces implementation, you may be able to open this up to more users and you wouldn't have to find a new name - just add it to facesgoodies. Dennis Byrne On 6/26/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Kito D. Mann schrieb: I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has FacesGoodies [1] :-). [1] http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ Why not adding it to facesgoodies then? I understand facesgoodies as template for quickstarting an application. I'd opt for the project name myfaces-orchestra-extras if we think nonasf is too non standard. Ciao, Mario -- Dennis Byrne
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Hi Dennis! Perhaps this has been covered already, but does it have binary deps on MyFaces? Or just the JSF API? No deps to MyFaces, else it would be a bug. If Orchstra has no dep on the MyFaces implementation, you may be able to open this up to more users and you wouldn't have to find a new name - just add it to facesgoodies. Yea, but then jsf-comp.sf.net might be a better and already known place, no? Ciao, Mario
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. Craig Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien wrote: Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few related experiments. I think that's a Facelets example. Where is the Clay love? :--) Craig Thanks On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: On 6/26/07, Werner Punz wrote: Mario Ivankovits schrieb: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf ++1 That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale project: http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring? Craig
Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
+1 On 6/25/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
RE: Orchestra on code.google.com
how about using jsf-comp.sf.net? got initiated for that reason... and a few of the components are used... regards Alexander -Original Message- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:29 PM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Orchestra on code.google.com Hi! code.google.com is fine for that. I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. Any objections about it? Ciao, Mario [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
