subject:"Upcoming Tomahawk Release"


Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
it into the shared branch right?

Sean

On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The logging stuff actually was in shared though.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)

Sean

On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
 But to me no showstopper.

 So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging was actually in shared BTW.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
  Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
  have you back on full time!
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Sean-
  
   TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
   I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
   For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller 
worked
   there for me.
  
   I go ahead and close this issue.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
   
-Matthias
   
On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?

 Sean

 On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
  release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
 
  That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick 
look
  at this one.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Jira issue created.
   Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,
   
Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

 -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
 -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
(scrolling through a table)
 -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered 
output)
 -forceId,jsp makes troubles
   duplicated IDs
 commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
 commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

   both are forceId=true

 for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
 a)forceIdForm:button
 b)dataTable:button


 but not all components are making problems
 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Just check the updated brunch.
  Now the *rc* looks good to me!
  Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
 
  Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
testing on
   this?  I will try to finish up the release process and 
start a vote
   thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing 
first though in
   order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like 
the one Matthias
   found.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
   
Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i 
don't have commit rights
yet.
   
   
Regards,
Catalin
   
Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Catalin,
   
Welcome to the team.
   
Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. 
Someone added a
bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably 
not all.
   
   
Can you add them to the tomahawk branch

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
up to the branch for you.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
it into the shared branch right?

Sean

On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The logging stuff actually was in shared though.

 Dennis Byrne

 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
 To: 'MyFaces Development'
 Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
 
 OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
 snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
 logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
 release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
 
 Sean
 
 On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
  But to me no showstopper.
 
  So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The logging was actually in shared BTW.
  
   Dennis Byrne
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
   To: 'MyFaces Development'
   Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
   
   OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
   Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
   have you back on full time!
   
   Sean
   
   On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean-
   
TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last 
testing.
For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller 
worked
there for me.
   
I go ahead and close this issue.
   
-Matthias
   
On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
 
  Sean
 
  On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
   release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone 
disagree?
  
   That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a 
quick look
   at this one.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jira issue created.
Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Matthias,

 Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
 That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.

 Sean

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
 
  -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
  -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
(scrolling through a table)
  -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered 
output)
  -forceId,jsp makes troubles
duplicated IDs
  commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
  commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
 
both are forceId=true
 
  for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
  a)forceIdForm:button
  b)dataTable:button
 
 
  but not all components are making problems
  -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Just check the updated brunch.
   Now the *rc* looks good to me!
   Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
  
   Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more 
basic testing on
this?  I will try to finish up the release process 
and start a vote
thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing 
first though in
order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like 
the one Matthias
found.
   
Sean
   
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)

 Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i 
don't have commit rights
 yet.


 Regards,
 Catalin

 Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


OK there is an updated release candidate up there now.  Can someone
check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in?  I need to
leave the office for a bit.  Once this is confirmed we can start the
vote thread.  (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for
an anticipated release.)

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
up to the branch for you.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
 it into the shared branch right?

 Sean

 On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
  snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
  logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
  release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
   But to me no showstopper.
  
   So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logging was actually in shared BTW.
   
Dennis Byrne
   
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last 
testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the 
scroller worked
 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
  
   Sean
  
   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 
1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone 
disagree?
   
That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a 
quick look
at this one.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding 
issues.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table for 
instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
(scrolling through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered 
output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform 
id=dataTable
  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more 
basic testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process 
and start a vote
 thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing 
first though in
 order that we not have any

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-07 Thread Paul Spencer


Please update the 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT so it the same as the RC.  This will make it
much easier to test the RC with maven project that are configure to use the
Tomahawk snapshot.

http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/

Paul Spencer

Sean Schofield wrote:

OK there is an updated release candidate up there now.  Can someone
check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in?  I need to
leave the office for a bit.  Once this is confirmed we can start the
vote thread.  (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for
an anticipated release.)

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
up to the branch for you.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
 it into the shared branch right?

 Sean

 On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 
1.1.3

  snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
  logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
  release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
   But to me no showstopper.
  
   So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logging was actually in shared BTW.
   
Dennis Byrne
   
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the 
release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  
Glad to

have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my 
last testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and 
the scroller worked

 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this 
release?

  
   Sean
  
   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present 
in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  
Anyone disagree?

   
That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks 
take a quick look

at this one.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version 
as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the 
outstanding issues.

 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of 
Tomahawk.

  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table 
for instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a 
*result* (scrolling through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of 
rendered output)

   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform 
id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform 
id=dataTable

  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf 
client id is

   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

The 1.1.3 SNAPSHOT is the release candidate :-) Technically its a
snapshot because maven considers anything that hasn't been
officially released as such.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Please update the 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT so it the same as the RC. This will make it
much easier to test the RC with maven project that are configure to use the
Tomahawk snapshot.

http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/

Paul Spencer

Sean Schofield wrote:
OK there is an updated release candidate up there now. Can someone
check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in? I need to
leave the office for a bit. Once this is confirmed we can start the
vote thread. (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for
an anticipated release.)

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk. I merged it
up to the branch for you.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven. You checked
it into the shared branch right?

Sean

On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logging stuff actually was in shared though.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then? The current
1.1.3
snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
logging changes that Dennis made. I'll put together the official
release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)

Sean

On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
But to me no showstopper.

So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logging was actually in shared BTW.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the
release.
Thanks for the help. You are a MyFaces animal these days.
Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean-

TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my
last testing.
For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and
the scroller worked
there for me.

I go ahead and close this issue.

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this
release?

Sean

On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present
in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.
Anyone disagree?

That leaves one last bug. TOMAHAWK-458. Can folks
take a quick look
at this one.

Sean

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jira issue created.
Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

-Matthias

On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,

Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version
as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That will allow us to keep track of the
outstanding issues.

Sean

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RI makes some trouble with this build of
Tomahawk.

-Some links are not working (sortable table
for instance)
-Some links I must trigger twice to get a
*result* (scrolling through a table)
-Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of
rendered output)
-forceId,jsp makes troubles
duplicated IDs
commandLink id=button insideform
id=forceIdForm
commandButton id=button insideform
id=dataTable

both are forceId=true

for me it should be fine, since their jsf
client id is
a)forceIdForm:button
b)dataTable:button

but not all components are making problems
-fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

-Matthias

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Hello Sean,

Thanks for getting this in the right branch, but I cannot see it when 
downloading the latest .

http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 08:04 AM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
up to the branch for you.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
 it into the shared branch right?

 Sean

 On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
  snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
  logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
  release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
   But to me no showstopper.
  
   So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logging was actually in shared BTW.
   
Dennis Byrne
   
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last 
 testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the 
 scroller worked
 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
  
   Sean
  
   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 
1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone 
disagree?
   
That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a 
quick look
at this one.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
  1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding 
  issues.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table for 
   instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
   (scrolling through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered 
   output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform 
   id=dataTable
  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more 
 basic testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-07 Thread Paul Spencer


Sean,
The snapshot is dated 25-May-2006 16:05.  Per your message, OK there is an 
updated
release candidate up there now, I was expecting one dated  today.

Paul Spencer


Sean Schofield wrote:

The 1.1.3 SNAPSHOT is the release candidate :-)  Technically its a
snapshot because maven considers anything that hasn't been
officially released as such.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please update the 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT so it the same as the RC.  This will 
make it
much easier to test the RC with maven project that are configure to 
use the

Tomahawk snapshot.

http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/ 



Paul Spencer

Sean Schofield wrote:
 OK there is an updated release candidate up there now.  Can someone
 check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in?  I need to
 leave the office for a bit.  Once this is confirmed we can start the
 vote thread.  (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for
 an anticipated release.)

 Sean


snip

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


Sorry I was confused.  You were talking about the snapshot repo and I
was thinking about the nightly dir.  Snapshot repo hasn't been updated
yet but I'll try when I get a chance.  That's probably a good idea for
testing RC since so many of our users are now (wisely) using maven.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sean,
The snapshot is dated 25-May-2006 16:05.  Per your message, OK there is an 
updated
release candidate up there now, I was expecting one dated  today.

Paul Spencer


Sean Schofield wrote:
 The 1.1.3 SNAPSHOT is the release candidate :-)  Technically its a
 snapshot because maven considers anything that hasn't been
 officially released as such.

 Sean

 On 6/7/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Please update the 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT so it the same as the RC.  This will
 make it
 much easier to test the RC with maven project that are configure to
 use the
 Tomahawk snapshot.

 
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/


 Paul Spencer

 Sean Schofield wrote:
  OK there is an updated release candidate up there now.  Can someone
  check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in?  I need to
  leave the office for a bit.  Once this is confirmed we can start the
  vote thread.  (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for
  an anticipated release.)
 
  Sean
 
snip

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


It seems I forgot to clean before assembling (I did clean before
install though.)  So the old class files are there.  I'm uploading the
new version now.  Can you try again?

Sean

On 6/7/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello Sean,

Thanks for getting this in the right branch, but I cannot see it when 
downloading the latest .

http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 08:04 AM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
up to the branch for you.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
 it into the shared branch right?

 Sean

 On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
  snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
  logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
  release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
   But to me no showstopper.
  
   So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logging was actually in shared BTW.
   
Dennis Byrne
   
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last 
testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the 
scroller worked
 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
  
   Sean
  
   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 
1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone 
disagree?
   
That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a 
quick look
at this one.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding 
issues.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table for 
instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
(scrolling through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered 
output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform 
id=dataTable
  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded in an 
form at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 12:55 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

It seems I forgot to clean before assembling (I did clean before
install though.)  So the old class files are there.  I'm uploading the
new version now.  Can you try again?

Sean

On 6/7/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Sean,

 Thanks for getting this in the right branch, but I cannot see it when 
 downloading the latest .

 http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/

 Dennis Byrne

 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 08:04 AM
 To: 'MyFaces Development'
 Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
 
 Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
 up to the branch for you.
 
 Sean
 
 On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
  it into the shared branch right?
 
  Sean
 
  On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
  
   Dennis Byrne
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
   To: 'MyFaces Development'
   Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
   
   OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
   snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
   logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
   release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
   
   Sean
   
   On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
But to me no showstopper.
   
So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
   
-Matthias
   
On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The logging was actually in shared BTW.

 Dennis Byrne

 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
 To: 'MyFaces Development'
 Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
 
 OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
 Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad 
 to
 have you back on full time!
 
 Sean
 
 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Sean-
 
  TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
  I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last 
  testing.
  For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the 
  scroller worked
  there for me.
 
  I go ahead and close this issue.
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this 
release?
   
Sean
   
On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 
 1.1.2
 release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone 
 disagree?

 That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take 
 a quick look
 at this one.

 Sean

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Jira issue created.
  Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Matthias,
  
   Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
   1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
   That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding 
   issues.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
   
-Some links are not working (sortable table for 
instance)
-Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
(scrolling through a table)
-Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of 
rendered output)
-forceId,jsp makes troubles
  duplicated IDs
commandLink id=button insideform 
id=forceIdForm
commandButton id=button   insideform 
id=dataTable

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-07 Thread Mario Ivankovits

Yes, unhappily - I get it too:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded in an 
form
at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)



Ciao,
Mario
 Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

 Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded in an 
 form at 
 org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

 From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


Mario/Dennis,

Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on?  I need to
run some errands.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yes, unhappily - I get it too:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded in an 
form
at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)



Ciao,
Mario
 Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

 Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded in an 
form at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

 From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


Can you guys check the final RC?

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/

Its difficult to see without running examples and I need to head out
this evening.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hmmm... Maybe I did not do clean before generate-assembly?  I'm
looking over the POM's and I don't see an obvious problem.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mario/Dennis,

 Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
 Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on?  I need to
 run some errands.

 Sean

 On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, unhappily - I get it too:
 
  java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded in 
an form
  at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)
 
 
 
  Ciao,
  Mario
   Sorry Sean, I still get this ...
  
   Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
   java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded in 
an form at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart
  
   From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Wessendorf

Yeah. will do testing later (with RI and MyFaces local build)

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Can you guys check the final RC?

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/

Its difficult to see without running examples and I need to head out
this evening.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm... Maybe I did not do clean before generate-assembly? I'm
looking over the POM's and I don't see an obvious problem.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario/Dennis,

Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on? I need to
run some errands.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, unhappily - I get it too:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded in
an form
at
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)

Ciao,
Mario
Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded
in an form at
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Still not seeing the logging.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 07:16 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Can you guys check the final RC?

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/

Its difficult to see without running examples and I need to head out
this evening.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hmmm... Maybe I did not do clean before generate-assembly?  I'm
 looking over the POM's and I don't see an obvious problem.

 Sean

 On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Mario/Dennis,

  Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
  Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on?  I need to
  run some errands.

  Sean

  On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yes, unhappily - I get it too:

   java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded 
   in an form
   at 
   org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)

   Ciao,
   Mario
Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded 
in an form at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


Grr ...

On 6/7/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Still not seeing the logging.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 07:16 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Can you guys check the final RC?

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/

Its difficult to see without running examples and I need to head out
this evening.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hmmm... Maybe I did not do clean before generate-assembly?  I'm
 looking over the POM's and I don't see an obvious problem.

 Sean

 On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Mario/Dennis,
 
  Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
  Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on?  I need to
  run some errands.
 
  Sean
 
  On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yes, unhappily - I get it too:
  
   java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded 
in an form
   at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)
  
  
  
   Ciao,
   Mario
Sorry Sean, I still get this ...
   
Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded 
in an form at 
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart
   
From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Dennis,

You did test this before committing right? In other words, you're
sure it worked at one point?

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Grr ...

On 6/7/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still not seeing the logging.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 07:16 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Can you guys check the final RC?

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/

Its difficult to see without running examples and I need to head out
this evening.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm... Maybe I did not do clean before generate-assembly? I'm
looking over the POM's and I don't see an obvious problem.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario/Dennis,

Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on? I need to
run some errands.

Sean

On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, unhappily - I get it too:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be embedded
in an form
at
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)

Ciao,
Mario
Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be
embedded in an form at
org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Sean,

The jar from the following URL works.  Sorry for the false alarm.

Dennis Byrne

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 11:12 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Dennis,

You did test this before committing right?  In other words, you're
sure it worked at one point?

Sean

On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Grr ...

 On 6/7/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Still not seeing the logging.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 07:16 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  Can you guys check the final RC?
  
  http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3/
  
  Its difficult to see without running examples and I need to head out
  this evening.
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hmmm... Maybe I did not do clean before generate-assembly?  I'm
   looking over the POM's and I don't see an obvious problem.
  
   Sean
  
   On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario/Dennis,
   
Can you try checking out the pieces (MyFaces Shared 2.0.2, MyFaces
Maven 1.0.3 and Tomahawk 1.1.3) and see what's going on?  I need to
run some errands.
   
Sean
   
On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, unhappily - I get it too:

 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp3 must be 
 embedded in an form
 at 
 org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart(HtmlLinkRendererBase.java:209)



 Ciao,
 Mario
  Sorry Sean, I still get this ...
 
  Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
  java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be 
  embedded in an form at 
  org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart
 
  From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Don't worry about it.  Sean must have fixed it.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2006 01:07 AM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Hi!
 Still not seeing the logging.

I'll pick it up.

Ciao,
Mario

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


simple example w/ tom 1.1.3 + myfaces core (api  impl) 1.1.4

works great

now RI

On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Don't worry about it.  Sean must have fixed it.

Even better ;-) Great! Thanks!
 Dennis Byrne

Mario





--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


mmm w/ RI I get some issues.

null pointers
non-working links (sortable header for instance)

Can anybody give it please a try w/ RI too?

I guess I get these errors by random...
sometimes RI works for me, sometime not..

thanks.

will be back after a good night sleep

-Matthias

On 6/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

simple example w/ tom 1.1.3 + myfaces core (api  impl) 1.1.4

works great

now RI

On 6/7/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Don't worry about it.  Sean must have fixed it.
 
 Even better ;-) Great! Thanks!
  Dennis Byrne

 Mario




--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com




--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
But to me no showstopper.

So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The logging was actually in shared BTW.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked
 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
  
   Sean
  
   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
   
That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
at this one.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling 
through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start 
a vote
 thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first 
though in
 order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one 
Matthias
 found.

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
 
  Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't 
have commit rights
  yet.
 
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Catalin,
 
  Welcome to the team.
 
  Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone 
added a
  bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
 
 
  Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't 
commit yet just
  send me the patch.
 
  Regards,
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
   I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a 
first problem is
  that
   they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a 
problem, cause the
 
   dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
  
   Regards,
   Catalin
  
   Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for
 
   testing
  
   @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
   
Installed the simple example war.
Some pages causing trouble:
-sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no 
efect)
-sortAutoTable.jsf

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-06 Thread Sean Schofield


OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)

Sean

On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
But to me no showstopper.

So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The logging was actually in shared BTW.

 Dennis Byrne

 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
 To: 'MyFaces Development'
 Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
 
 OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
 Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
 have you back on full time!
 
 Sean
 
 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Sean-
 
  TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
  I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
  For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked
  there for me.
 
  I go ahead and close this issue.
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
   
Sean
   
On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
 release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?

 That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
 at this one.

 Sean

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Jira issue created.
  Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Matthias,
  
   Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
   That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
   
-Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
-Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling 
through a table)
-Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
-forceId,jsp makes troubles
  duplicated IDs
commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
   
  both are forceId=true
   
for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
a)forceIdForm:button
b)dataTable:button
   
   
but not all components are making problems
-fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just check the updated brunch.
 Now the *rc* looks good to me!
 Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.

 Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime

 -Matthias

 On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
testing on
  this?  I will try to finish up the release process and 
start a vote
  thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first 
though in
  order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the 
one Matthias
  found.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
  
   Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't 
have commit rights
   yet.
  
  
   Regards,
   Catalin
  
   Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Catalin,
  
   Welcome to the team.
  
   Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone 
added a
   bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not 
all.
  
  
   Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't 
commit yet just
   send me the patch.
  
   Regards,
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a 
first problem is
   that
they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a 
problem, cause the
  
dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
   
Regards,
Catalin
   
Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


ok go for the official rc tomorrow.


On 6/6/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)

Sean

On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
 But to me no showstopper.

 So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging was actually in shared BTW.
 
  Dennis Byrne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
  
  OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
  Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
  have you back on full time!
  
  Sean
  
  On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Sean-
  
   TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
   I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
   For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller 
worked
   there for me.
  
   I go ahead and close this issue.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
   
-Matthias
   
On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?

 Sean

 On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
  release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
 
  That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick 
look
  at this one.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Jira issue created.
   Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,
   
Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

 -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
 -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
(scrolling through a table)
 -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
 -forceId,jsp makes troubles
   duplicated IDs
 commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
 commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

   both are forceId=true

 for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
 a)forceIdForm:button
 b)dataTable:button


 but not all components are making problems
 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Just check the updated brunch.
  Now the *rc* looks good to me!
  Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
 
  Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
testing on
   this?  I will try to finish up the release process and 
start a vote
   thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing 
first though in
   order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the 
one Matthias
   found.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
   
Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't 
have commit rights
yet.
   
   
Regards,
Catalin
   
Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Catalin,
   
Welcome to the team.
   
Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. 
Someone added a
bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not 
all.
   
   
Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't 
commit yet just
send me the patch.
   
Regards,
   
Sean
   
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
 I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, 
a first problem is
that
 they are missing

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-06 Thread Dennis Byrne

The logging stuff actually was in shared though.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current 1.1.3
snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)

Sean

On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI
 But to me no showstopper.

 So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The logging was actually in shared BTW.

  Dennis Byrne

  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
  To: 'MyFaces Development'
  Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

  OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
  Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
  have you back on full time!

  Sean

  On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Sean-

   TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
   I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
   For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller 
   worked
   there for me.

   I go ahead and close this issue.

   -Matthias

   On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?

 Sean

 On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
  release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?

  That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick 
  look
  at this one.

  Sean

  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Jira issue created.
   Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

   -Matthias

   On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,

Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.

Sean

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

 -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
 -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* 
 (scrolling through a table)
 -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered 
 output)
 -forceId,jsp makes troubles
   duplicated IDs
 commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
 commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

   both are forceId=true

 for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
 a)forceIdForm:button
 b)dataTable:button

 but not all components are making problems
 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Just check the updated brunch.
  Now the *rc* looks good to me!
  Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.

  Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime

  -Matthias

  On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
   testing on
   this?  I will try to finish up the release process and 
   start a vote
   thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing 
   first though in
   order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like 
   the one Matthias
   found.

   Sean

   On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)

Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i 
don't have commit rights
yet.

Regards,
Catalin

Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Catalin,

Welcome to the team.

Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. 
Someone added a
bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably 
not all.

Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't 
commit yet just

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?

Sean

On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?

That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
at this one.

Sean

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling through a 
table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a vote
 thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first though in
 order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one Matthias
 found.

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
 
  Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have commit 
rights
  yet.
 
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Catalin,
 
  Welcome to the team.
 
  Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a
  bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
 
 
  Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit yet 
just
  send me the patch.
 
  Regards,
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
   I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first 
problem is
  that
   they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, cause 
the
 
   dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
  
   Regards,
   Catalin
  
   Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for
 
   testing
  
   @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
   
Installed the simple example war.
Some pages causing trouble:
-sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
-sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
-pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no 
effect,
when you click first time.
summary: for navigation to next page (after page has rendered 
first
time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to the 
next
page, as expected)
same for upload example too
   
   
Tree2 is working fine
   
-Matthias
   
   
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
 I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the 
moment.
 The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 
1.1.3 is
 not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I will 
change
 them before the official release. That shouldn't make a 
difference
 though.

 I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some people take 
a look
 at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? Just do a 
mvn
 install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)

 Sean

   
   
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
   
  
  
  
   -
   How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone 
call
   rates.
  
 
 
 
 
   
  Do you Yahoo!?
   Get on board. You're

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-05 Thread Dennis Byrne

I just placed tomahawk 1.1.3 in with core 1.1.3 .  I found that each formless 
commandLink threw an exception.  I have not been following the tomahawk stuff 
as closely as I should - I take it this was done in order to increase 
inter-operability?

If this is the plan, I think there are going to be a lot of confused developers 
- even if the release announcement and the MyFaces home page warns about this.  
Remember how many messages there were even after Martin had specifically 
mentioned the last tomahawk release could not be used with the older versions 
of MyFaces?

I don't want to hold up the tomahawk release, but I actually think a better 
logging would be needed here.  It is especially difficult to track this down 
when the logs tell you to find the control _idJsp0 .  Can we give the path to 
component, as well as a suggestion to change h:commandLink to t:commandLink ?

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 02:25 PM
To: 'Dennis Byrne'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

I'm uploading one to the nightly build dir right now.  Remember its
version 1.1.3 that we are about to release.

Sean

On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No chance of getting a jar out there?  I can test for a few hours at work 
 today.  Large application with lots of tomahawk goodness.

 Dennis Byrne

 Yes, I forgot to build it this weekend and bring it to work.

 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 10:06 AM
 To: 'MyFaces Development'
 Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
 
 Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
 
 Sean
 
 On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
  release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
 
  That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
  at this one.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Jira issue created.
   Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,
   
Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

 -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
 -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling 
 through a table)
 -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
 -forceId,jsp makes troubles
   duplicated IDs
 commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
 commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

   both are forceId=true

 for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
 a)forceIdForm:button
 b)dataTable:button


 but not all components are making problems
 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Just check the updated brunch.
  Now the *rc* looks good to me!
  Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
 
  Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing 
   on
   this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a 
   vote
   thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first 
   though in
   order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one 
   Matthias
   found.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
   
Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have 
commit rights
yet.
   
   
Regards,
Catalin
   
Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Catalin,
   
Welcome to the team.
   
Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone 
added a
bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
   
   
Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit 
yet just
send me the patch.
   
Regards,
   
Sean
   
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
 I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first 
 problem is
that
 they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, 
 cause the
   
 dummy form is no more added? not sure though.

 Regards,
 Catalin

 Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


I just placed tomahawk 1.1.3 in with core 1.1.3 .  I found that each formless 
commandLink threw an exception.  I have not been following the tomahawk stuff 
as closely as I should - I take it this was done in order to increase 
inter-operability?


Yes disallowing formless command link is necessary for use with the
RI.  I'm not the expert on this topic but those who have looked into
this tell me as much.


If this is the plan, I think there are going to be a lot of confused developers 
- even if the release announcement and the MyFaces home page warns about this.  
Remember how many messages there were even after Martin had specifically 
mentioned the last tomahawk release could not be used with the older versions 
of MyFaces?


Yes release notes and website notes are a minimum but probably not sufficient.


I don't want to hold up the tomahawk release, but I actually think a better 
logging would be needed here.  It is especially difficult to track this down 
when the logs tell you to find the control _idJsp0 .  Can we give the path to 
component, as well as a suggestion to change h:commandLink to t:commandLink ?


No problem.  Can you add this code now?  If you can't do svn commit
just send your patch to this thread and someone will apply it to the
branch.


Dennis Byrne


Sean

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-05 Thread Dennis Byrne

No problem.  Can you add this code now?  If you can't do svn commit
just send your patch to this thread and someone will apply it to the
branch.

No problem, but I will not be able to do this for about 10 hours.  I know you 
guys wanted to get this out the door soon, so just release if you want.  
Otherwise it won't be available until most committers are waking up.

Sean

Dennis Byrne

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


We'll wait.  We've waited this long and anything that will reduce
confusion is probably worth while.

Sean

On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

No problem.  Can you add this code now?  If you can't do svn commit
just send your patch to this thread and someone will apply it to the
branch.

No problem, but I will not be able to do this for about 10 hours.  I know you 
guys wanted to get this out the door soon, so just release if you want.  
Otherwise it won't be available until most committers are waking up.

Sean

Dennis Byrne

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


Sean-

TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked
there for me.

I go ahead and close this issue.

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?

 Sean

 On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
  release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
 
  That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
  at this one.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Jira issue created.
   Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,
   
Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

 -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
 -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling through 
a table)
 -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
 -forceId,jsp makes troubles
   duplicated IDs
 commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
 commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

   both are forceId=true

 for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
 a)forceIdForm:button
 b)dataTable:button


 but not all components are making problems
 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Just check the updated brunch.
  Now the *rc* looks good to me!
  Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
 
  Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing on
   this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a 
vote
   thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first though 
in
   order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one 
Matthias
   found.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
   
Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have 
commit rights
yet.
   
   
Regards,
Catalin
   
Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Catalin,
   
Welcome to the team.
   
Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a
bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
   
   
Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit 
yet just
send me the patch.
   
Regards,
   
Sean
   
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
 I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first 
problem is
that
 they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, 
cause the
   
 dummy form is no more added? not sure though.

 Regards,
 Catalin

 Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for
   
 testing

 @Everyone: Any ideas on these?

 Sean

 On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
  mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
 
  Installed the simple example war.
  Some pages causing trouble:
  -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
  -sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
  -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no 
effect,
  when you click first time.
  summary: for navigation to next page (after page has 
rendered first
  time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to 
the next
  page, as expected)
  same for upload example too
 
 
  Tree2 is working fine
 
  -Matthias
 
 
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
   I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at 
the moment.
   The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT 
since 1.1.3 is
   not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I 
will change
   them before the official release. That shouldn't make a 
difference
   though.
  
   I'm going to be

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sean-

TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked
there for me.

I go ahead and close this issue.

-Matthias

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
 
  Sean
 
  On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
   release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
  
   That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
   at this one.
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jira issue created.
Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Matthias,

 Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
 That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.

 Sean

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
 
  -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
  -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling 
through a table)
  -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
  -forceId,jsp makes troubles
duplicated IDs
  commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
  commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
 
both are forceId=true
 
  for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
  a)forceIdForm:button
  b)dataTable:button
 
 
  but not all components are making problems
  -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Just check the updated brunch.
   Now the *rc* looks good to me!
   Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
  
   Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing 
on
this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a 
vote
thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first 
though in
order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one 
Matthias
found.
   
Sean
   
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)

 Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have 
commit rights
 yet.


 Regards,
 Catalin

 Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Catalin,

 Welcome to the team.

 Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone 
added a
 bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.


 Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit 
yet just
 send me the patch.

 Regards,

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
  I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first 
problem is
 that
  they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, 
cause the

  dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for

  testing
 
  @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
   mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
  
   Installed the simple example war.
   Some pages causing trouble:
   -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
   -sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
   -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has 
no effect,
   when you click first time.
   summary: for navigation to next page (after page has 
rendered first
   time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to 
the next
   page, as expected)
   same for upload example too
  
  
   Tree2 is working fine
  
   -Matthias
  
  
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-05 Thread Martin Marinschek


It's real cool that Matze is assigned to us full time now. He has
never stopped loving the project, but now he's got the time as well.
Mighty cool!

regards,

Martin

On 6/6/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked
 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?
  
   Sean
  
   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
   
That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
at this one.
   
Sean
   
On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,
 
  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
  
   -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling 
through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
  
 both are forceId=true
  
   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button
  
  
   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
   
Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start 
a vote
 thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first 
though in
 order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one 
Matthias
 found.

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
 
  Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have 
commit rights
  yet.
 
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Catalin,
 
  Welcome to the team.
 
  Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone 
added a
  bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
 
 
  Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't 
commit yet just
  send me the patch.
 
  Regards,
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
   I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a 
first problem is
  that
   they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, 
cause the
 
   dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
  
   Regards,
   Catalin
  
   Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for
 
   testing
  
   @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
   
Installed the simple example war.
Some pages causing trouble:
-sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no 
efect)
-sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
-pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has 
no effect,
when you click first time.
summary: for navigation to next page (after page has 
rendered first

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-05 Thread Dennis Byrne

The logging was actually in shared BTW.

Dennis Byrne

-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.
Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these days.  Glad to
have you back on full time!

Sean

On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sean-

 TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
 I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing.
 For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked
 there for me.

 I go ahead and close this issue.

 -Matthias

 On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).

  -Matthias

  On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release?

   Sean

   On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?

That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
at this one.

Sean

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jira issue created.
 Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

 -Matthias

 On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Matthias,

  Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
  That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.

  Sean

  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

   -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
   -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling 
   through a table)
   -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
   -forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

 both are forceId=true

   for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
   a)forceIdForm:button
   b)dataTable:button

   but not all components are making problems
   -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

   -Matthias

   On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.

Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime

-Matthias

On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic 
 testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start 
 a vote
 thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first 
 though in
 order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one 
 Matthias
 found.

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)

  Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't 
  have commit rights
  yet.

  Regards,
  Catalin

  Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Catalin,

  Welcome to the team.

  Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone 
  added a
  bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.

  Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't 
  commit yet just
  send me the patch.

  Regards,

  Sean

  On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
   I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a 
   first problem is
  that
   they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a 
   problem, cause the

   dummy form is no more added? not sure though.

   Regards,
   Catalin

   Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for

   testing

   @Everyone: Any ideas on these?

   Sean

   On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.

Installed the simple example war.
Some pages causing trouble:
-sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no 
efect)
-sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
-pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons 
has

RE: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-02 Thread Jeremy J. Grelle

I just did a completely fresh checkout of the tomahawk 1_1_3 branch to
build and do some testing and it seems the dependencies on api and impl
have changed to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.  I thought the coming release was only
for Tomahawk, so isn't this incorrect?  It should still be built against
api/impl 1.1.3, right?  Also, what about the dependency on
2.0.2-SNAPSHOT?

Thanks,
Jeremy

Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:51 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the moment.
The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is
not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.)  I will change
them before the official release.  That shouldn't make a difference
though.

I'm going to be offline for the weekend.  Can some people take a look
at this over the weekend and do some basic testing?  Just do a mvn
install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)

Sean

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-02 Thread Sean Schofield


Hmmm api and impl should probably be changed to the 1.1.3 release
version at this point.  The 2.0.2 snapshot for shared is correct.
We'll release it when we release tomhawk so it will be changed from
snapshot to final at that point.  Right now the snapshot is the
proposed final version.

Sean

On 6/1/06, Jeremy J. Grelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I just did a completely fresh checkout of the tomahawk 1_1_3 branch to
build and do some testing and it seems the dependencies on api and impl
have changed to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.  I thought the coming release was only
for Tomahawk, so isn't this incorrect?  It should still be built against
api/impl 1.1.3, right?  Also, what about the dependency on
2.0.2-SNAPSHOT?

Thanks,
Jeremy

Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:51 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the moment.
The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is
not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.)  I will change
them before the official release.  That shouldn't make a difference
though.

I'm going to be offline for the weekend.  Can some people take a look
at this over the weekend and do some basic testing?  Just do a mvn
install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)

Sean

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-02 Thread Sean Schofield


I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2
release so I don't consider these showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?

That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.  Can folks take a quick look
at this one.

Sean

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jira issue created.
Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try!

-Matthias

On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Matthias,

 Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
 That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues.

 Sean

 On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
 
  -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
  -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling through a 
table)
  -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
  -forceId,jsp makes troubles
duplicated IDs
  commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
  commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable
 
both are forceId=true
 
  for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
  a)forceIdForm:button
  b)dataTable:button
 
 
  but not all components are making problems
  -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
 
  -Matthias
 
  On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Just check the updated brunch.
   Now the *rc* looks good to me!
   Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
  
   Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing on
this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a vote
thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first though in
order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one Matthias
found.
   
Sean
   
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)

 Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have commit 
rights
 yet.


 Regards,
 Catalin

 Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Catalin,

 Welcome to the team.

 Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a
 bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.


 Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit yet just
 send me the patch.

 Regards,

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
  I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first problem 
is
 that
  they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, cause the

  dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for

  testing
 
  @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
   mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
  
   Installed the simple example war.
   Some pages causing trouble:
   -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
   -sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
   -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no effect,
   when you click first time.
   summary: for navigation to next page (after page has rendered 
first
   time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to the next
   page, as expected)
   same for upload example too
  
  
   Tree2 is working fine
  
   -Matthias
  
  
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the 
moment.
The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 
1.1.3 is
not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I will 
change
them before the official release. That shouldn't make a 
difference
though.
   
I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some people take a 
look
at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? Just do a 
mvn
install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)
   
Sean
   
  
  
   --
   Matthias Wessendorf
   Aechterhoek 18
   48282 Emsdetten
   http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
   mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
  
 
 
 
  -
  How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone 
call
  rates.
 




  
 Do you Yahoo!?
  Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.


   
  
  
   --
   Matthias Wessendorf
   Aechterhoek 18
   48282 Emsdetten
   http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
   mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
  
 
 
  --
  Matthias Wessendorf
  Aechterhoek 18
  48282 Emsdetten

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-06-02 Thread Sean Schofield


I just did a completely fresh checkout of the tomahawk 1_1_3 branch to
build and do some testing and it seems the dependencies on api and impl
have changed to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.  I thought the coming release was only
for Tomahawk, so isn't this incorrect?  It should still be built against
api/impl 1.1.3, right?  Also, what about the dependency on
2.0.2-SNAPSHOT?


I changed to core 1.1.2 since the 1.1.3 version is not in ibiblio and
it shouldn't matter since its only used for compile and testing
purposes.  Thanks for pointing this out.  Feel free to checkout the
branch again and see if things are working properly.


Thanks,
Jeremy


Sean

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-05-31 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.

Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime

-Matthias

On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing on
this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a vote
thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first though in
order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one Matthias
found.

Sean

On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)

 Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have commit rights
 yet.


 Regards,
 Catalin

 Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Catalin,

 Welcome to the team.

 Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a
 bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.


 Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit yet just
 send me the patch.

 Regards,

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
  I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first problem is
 that
  they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, cause the

  dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for

  testing
 
  @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
   mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
  
   Installed the simple example war.
   Some pages causing trouble:
   -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
   -sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
   -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no effect,
   when you click first time.
   summary: for navigation to next page (after page has rendered first
   time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to the next
   page, as expected)
   same for upload example too
  
  
   Tree2 is working fine
  
   -Matthias
  
  
  
   -Matthias
  
   On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the moment.
The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is
not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I will change
them before the official release. That shouldn't make a difference
though.
   
I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some people take a look
at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? Just do a mvn
install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)
   
Sean
   
  
  
   --
   Matthias Wessendorf
   Aechterhoek 18
   48282 Emsdetten
   http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
   mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
  
 
 
 
  -
  How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
  rates.
 




  
 Do you Yahoo!?
  Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.






--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-05-31 Thread Matthias Wessendorf


RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk.

-Some links are not working (sortable table for instance)
-Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling through a table)
-Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
-forceId,jsp makes troubles
 duplicated IDs
   commandLink id=button insideform id=forceIdForm
   commandButton id=button   insideform id=dataTable

 both are forceId=true

for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is
a)forceIdForm:button
b)dataTable:button


but not all components are making problems
-fileupload or tree2 are working fine.

-Matthias

On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just check the updated brunch.
Now the *rc* looks good to me!
Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.

Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime

-Matthias

On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Patch has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing on
 this?  I will try to finish up the release process and start a vote
 thread tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first though in
 order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one Matthias
 found.

 Sean

 On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
 
  Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have commit rights
  yet.
 
 
  Regards,
  Catalin
 
  Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Catalin,
 
  Welcome to the team.
 
  Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a
  bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
 
 
  Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit yet just
  send me the patch.
 
  Regards,
 
  Sean
 
  On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
   I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first problem is
  that
   they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, cause the
 
   dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
  
   Regards,
   Catalin
  
   Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for
 
   testing
  
   @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
  
   Sean
  
   On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
   
Installed the simple example war.
Some pages causing trouble:
-sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
-sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
-pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no effect,
when you click first time.
summary: for navigation to next page (after page has rendered first
time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to the next
page, as expected)
same for upload example too
   
   
Tree2 is working fine
   
-Matthias
   
   
   
-Matthias
   
On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
 I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the moment.
 The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is
 not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I will change
 them before the official release. That shouldn't make a difference
 though.

 I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some people take a look
 at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? Just do a mvn
 install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)

 Sean

   
   
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
   
  
  
  
   -
   How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
   rates.
  
 
 
 
 
   
  Do you Yahoo!?
   Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
 
 



--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com




--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Hi!
 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
I wonder that you found that tree2 works fine.

Yesterday I reverted two commits in svn head as the tree was completely
broken here.
I planned to inform Sean about it, but havent found the time lately, but
now its done :-)

The commits were: r410269 and r410276


Ciao,
Mario

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release


 -fileupload or tree2 are working fine.
 
 I wonder that you found that tree2 works fine.
   
Ok, I checked the release creation date and those changes where
introduces before the branch.
So definitely the tree is broken, even it our examples works.

The problems were:
usage of Boolean.getBoolean() instead of using tomhawaks
setBooleanProperty as I changed it now.
The first queries the system environment instead of simply converting
the passed value to a boolean.

and the removal of a for loop which indeed wasnt unnecessary.

Ciao,
Mario

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Sean,
please add the following snippet to the release notes regarding how to
reactive the dummyForm feature:

renderer
component-familyjavax.faces.Command/component-family
renderer-typejavax.faces.Button/renderer-type
   
renderer-classorg.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.jsf.ExtendedHtmlButtonRenderer/renderer-class
/renderer

renderer
component-familyjavax.faces.Command/component-family
renderer-typejavax.faces.Link/renderer-type
   
renderer-classorg.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.jsf.ExtendedHtmlLinkRenderer/renderer-class
/renderer

This will only work when one use MyFaces impl for sure - as before.

Thanks!
Ciao,
Mario

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

2006-05-31 Thread Sean Schofield


The commits were: r410269 and r410276


So these need to be removed from the branch?

In the future, when there is a branch, please make your fixes on the
branch instead of the trunk.  If we focus on the branch and get it
released then we can merge down soon enough.


Mario


Sean

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release