Re: right content of shared/core
Although I don't know how the Trinidad code generation works in detail, I think we should give it a try to generate the components for the HTML Basic renderkit... Bruno On 10/25/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trinidad has maven2 plugins for that. the cool thing is it uses templates, which are valid java files. so, if you like you can add a param. to use standard jsf templates instead of the trinidad templates, which are using FacesBean for instance. -M On 10/25/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andreas, Generic code across both the implementation and tomahawk belong in shared/core. The shared package is then morphed into shared_core and shared_tomahawk at build time. I don't see any hard and fast rule for what is generic - use your discretion. Team, wasn't there talk a ways back about generating the tags for the 1.2 implementation? I remember someone talking about leveraging some work over in Trinidad for this. Please speak up on this issue in order to prevent a possible large duplication of effort. Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Andreas Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 05:36 PM To: dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: right content of shared/core Hello, I'm currently implementing the Core-Tags for JSR-252. Is there a rule, where to put the generic classes? For some Tags I created generic classes [1],[2] and put them in the myfaces-impl jar. But now I've seen that e.g. the ConvertDateTimeTagBase is stored in shared/core. So I guess, that all generic classes should be stored in shared/core, am I right? And is there a namespace for generic classes? cheers, Andreas [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1474 [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1475 -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: right content of shared/core
Hi Andreas, Generic code across both the implementation and tomahawk belong in shared/core. The shared package is then morphed into shared_core and shared_tomahawk at build time. I don't see any hard and fast rule for what is generic - use your discretion. Team, wasn't there talk a ways back about generating the tags for the 1.2 implementation? I remember someone talking about leveraging some work over in Trinidad for this. Please speak up on this issue in order to prevent a possible large duplication of effort. Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Andreas Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 05:36 PM To: dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: right content of shared/core Hello, I'm currently implementing the Core-Tags for JSR-252. Is there a rule, where to put the generic classes? For some Tags I created generic classes [1],[2] and put them in the myfaces-impl jar. But now I've seen that e.g. the ConvertDateTimeTagBase is stored in shared/core. So I guess, that all generic classes should be stored in shared/core, am I right? And is there a namespace for generic classes? cheers, Andreas [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1474 [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1475
Re: right content of shared/core
Trinidad has maven2 plugins for that. the cool thing is it uses templates, which are valid java files. so, if you like you can add a param. to use standard jsf templates instead of the trinidad templates, which are using FacesBean for instance. -M On 10/25/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andreas, Generic code across both the implementation and tomahawk belong in shared/core. The shared package is then morphed into shared_core and shared_tomahawk at build time. I don't see any hard and fast rule for what is generic - use your discretion. Team, wasn't there talk a ways back about generating the tags for the 1.2 implementation? I remember someone talking about leveraging some work over in Trinidad for this. Please speak up on this issue in order to prevent a possible large duplication of effort. Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Andreas Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 05:36 PM To: dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: right content of shared/core Hello, I'm currently implementing the Core-Tags for JSR-252. Is there a rule, where to put the generic classes? For some Tags I created generic classes [1],[2] and put them in the myfaces-impl jar. But now I've seen that e.g. the ConvertDateTimeTagBase is stored in shared/core. So I guess, that all generic classes should be stored in shared/core, am I right? And is there a namespace for generic classes? cheers, Andreas [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1474 [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1475 -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
right content of shared/core
Hello, I'm currently implementing the Core-Tags for JSR-252. Is there a rule, where to put the generic classes? For some Tags I created generic classes [1],[2] and put them in the myfaces-impl jar. But now I've seen that e.g. the ConvertDateTimeTagBase is stored in shared/core. So I guess, that all generic classes should be stored in shared/core, am I right? And is there a namespace for generic classes? cheers, Andreas [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1474 [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1475
