[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6144) FindShipment.groovy error due to null findShipmentExprs

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14357114#comment-14357114
 ] 

Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-6144:
-

FindShipment.groovy used to have a check to make sure findShipmentExprs existed 
before performing the query at line 135.

 FindShipment.groovy error due to null findShipmentExprs
 ---

 Key: OFBIZ-6144
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6144
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow

 The error below occurs when findShipmentExprs is null in FindShipment.groovy 
 which prevents the page from even displaying.  IMO the FindShipment.groovy 
 and FindShipment.ftl should be replaced with form widgets.
 ERROR rendering error page [/error/error.jsp], but here is the error text: 
 org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering screen 
 [component://product/widget/facility/ShipmentScreens.xml#FindShipment]: 
 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error running script at location 
 [component://product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/FindShipment.groovy]:
  groovy.lang.GroovyRuntimeException: Ambiguous method overloading for method 
 org.ofbiz.entity.util.EntityQuery#where. Cannot resolve which method to 
 invoke for [null] due to overlapping prototypes between: [interface 
 java.util.List] [interface java.util.Map] (Error running script at location 
 [component://product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/FindShipment.groovy]:
  groovy.lang.GroovyRuntimeException: Ambiguous method overloading for method 
 org.ofbiz.entity.util.EntityQuery#where. Cannot resolve which method to 
 invoke for [null] due to overlapping prototypes between: [interface 
 java.util.List] [interface java.util.Map])



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: OFBiz integration for Magento eCommerce

2015-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Le 11/03/2015 12:19, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:45 PM, Pierre Smitspierre.sm...@gmail.com  wrote:


Apart from that, might I suggest another approach: in stead of committing
the solution straight away into the special purpose stack, why don't you
create the umbrella issue and attach the patch to it

Yes, this is exactly what I was planning to do, I will ask Arun Patidar to 
prepare a patch and submit it to a Jira ticket.
I was not seeking for approval to commit before a community review, but instead 
I was offering to the community an opportunity to get a new contribution and I 
was checking for its interest in it.


Is it a big stuff? Anyway this is completely external I guess, so indeed it 
should have no implications on current state.

Jacques



Regards,

Jacopo



[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6143) Incorporate the readme for the projectmgr component

2015-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Smits reassigned OFBIZ-6143:
---

Assignee: Pierre Smits

 Incorporate the readme for the projectmgr component
 ---

 Key: OFBIZ-6143
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6143
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Pierre Smits
Assignee: Pierre Smits





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: OFBiz integration for Magento eCommerce

2015-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Feb 27, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com 
wrote:

 That's quite an interesting proposition. I guess HotWax Systems already used 
 it in production?
 
 Jacques

We have implemented this as a product, not for a customer project and we will 
present it in an upcoming Magento conference.

Jacopo

 
 Le 27/02/2015 09:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
 Hi all,
 
 in the last year, the research and development lab of HotWax Systems has 
 implemented a series of components and tools for OFBiz.
 Some of them are ready-to-be-used applications and, in my opinion, would be 
 a good fit for OFBiz.
 
 After discussing the topic internally, we believe that the community could 
 benefit from them and at the same time help to further improve them.
 
 Accordingly, I would like to start by exploring with you the opportunity to 
 include in OFBiz our integration with Magento eCommerce platform.
 
 Magento eCommerce (http://magento.com/products/overview) is a popular 
 solution for merchants; it is an open source product (but the company is 
 owned by eBay).
 In terms of features it competes with the OFBiz ecommerce component, but it 
 is easier to setup and with a shorter go to market.
 For these reasons it is a good fit for small-medium merchants that need an 
 ecommerce store with no backend capabilities and it has a very large users 
 base.
 
 We realized that there could be a rather large group of merchants, already 
 using Magento for online sales, that may be interested in integrating it 
 with a powerful ERP system for the backend tasks (order fulfillment, 
 accounting etc...).
 
 The integration component we have implemented has a nice user interface to 
 import categories, products, orders from Magento eCommerce and then synch 
 held/cancelled orders; there are screens to manage shipment options and 
 product store settings.
 
 You can find some screenshot here:
 http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/magento-integration-2.png
 http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/magento-integration-3.png
 http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/magento-integration-4.png
 http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/magento-integration-5.png
 
 Arun Patidar led the effort and is happy to provide additional details so 
 please feel free to ask any questions.
 
 In my opinion this product could be integrated as a specialpurpose 
 component, but I am open to suggestions.
 
 What do you think?
 
 Jacopo
 



[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6144) FindShipment.groovy error due to null findShipmentExprs

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6144:

Attachment: OFBIZ-6144.patch

This patch replaces FindShipment.groovy and FindShipment.ftl with form widgets. 
 The two files can probably be removed once this patch is applied.

 FindShipment.groovy error due to null findShipmentExprs
 ---

 Key: OFBIZ-6144
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6144
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow
 Attachments: OFBIZ-6144.patch


 The error below occurs when findShipmentExprs is null in FindShipment.groovy 
 which prevents the page from even displaying.  IMO the FindShipment.groovy 
 and FindShipment.ftl should be replaced with form widgets.
 ERROR rendering error page [/error/error.jsp], but here is the error text: 
 org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering screen 
 [component://product/widget/facility/ShipmentScreens.xml#FindShipment]: 
 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error running script at location 
 [component://product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/FindShipment.groovy]:
  groovy.lang.GroovyRuntimeException: Ambiguous method overloading for method 
 org.ofbiz.entity.util.EntityQuery#where. Cannot resolve which method to 
 invoke for [null] due to overlapping prototypes between: [interface 
 java.util.List] [interface java.util.Map] (Error running script at location 
 [component://product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/FindShipment.groovy]:
  groovy.lang.GroovyRuntimeException: Ambiguous method overloading for method 
 org.ofbiz.entity.util.EntityQuery#where. Cannot resolve which method to 
 invoke for [null] due to overlapping prototypes between: [interface 
 java.util.List] [interface java.util.Map])



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Hi Infra Team and All,

I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our OFBiz 
PMC ML.

Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely disconnect from 
it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active committers. The difference 
with an active committer is s/he will never know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.


A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With security 
holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder why a committer account can not be terminated?


Thanks

Jacques



[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5573) Implementation of VENDOR MANAGEMENT software in Ofbiz in ecommerce component

2015-03-12 Thread Ravi Shekhar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14357171#comment-14357171
 ] 

Ravi Shekhar commented on OFBIZ-5573:
-

Is there any interest or approach decided for the marketplace implemetation? Is 
this issue going anywhere?

 Implementation  of VENDOR MANAGEMENT software in Ofbiz in ecommerce component
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-5573
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5573
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce
 Environment: Software platform, Ecommerce component, Party Component,
 Catalog Component
Reporter: Heidi Dehaes
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: vendor_spec-1.pdf, vendor_spec.doc, vendor_spec.doc, 
 vendor_specifications_17_Oktober_2014-2B.doc, 
 vendor_specifications_17_Oktober_2014.doc, 
 vendor_specifications_17_Oktober_2014.doc, 
 vendor_specifications_2_july_2014.doc


 Wants to initiate the development of a VENDOR ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT for 
 ofbiz in the ecommerce component as exists also in the Amazon ecommerce 
 websites. An external vendor must be able to put products and sell the 
 products on the ecommerce platform of the owner.
 Involved: 
 - ioannis ntantis giannis...@gmail.com
 - Heidi  Eric info.ola...@gmail.com
 Requirements:
 - ... to be added.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5522) Introduce websocket usage

2015-03-12 Thread Neeraj kumar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14358488#comment-14358488
 ] 

Neeraj kumar commented on OFBIZ-5522:
-

Always decide on a efficient moreover to well-known getting along with going 
company.
Visit for Best info:
Packers and Movers Pune @ http://packersmoverspune.top3rd.in/
Packers and Movers Hyderabad @ 
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-hyderabad/
Packers and Movers Mumbai @ http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-mumbai/
Packers and Movers Mumbai @ http://www.local5th.in/packers-and-movers-mumbai/
Packers and Movers Chennai @ http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-chennai/

 Introduce websocket usage
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-5522
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: framework
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
Priority: Minor

 After a discussion with Ean, was suggested (draft here):
 You need a service that lets you subscribe a widget to an entity and
 then propagate change events to the widget as the entity is modified.
 A generic mechanism like that could eventually expand to be a general
 purpose data bound widgets system that mostly looks like the existing
 system but magically reflects updates.
 Could be used with/for
 * The entity cache and webforms to automatically update views when data 
 changes. 
 * Replaces the current system notes
 * Create a dashboard type pages  (to be discussed futher)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5522) Introduce websocket usage

2015-03-12 Thread Neeraj kumar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14358516#comment-14358516
 ] 

Neeraj kumar commented on OFBIZ-5522:
-

These functions appear simple but in real they are frustrating and topsy-turvy 
one. But selecting an outstanding Packers Moving organizations Organization can 
create your career trouble-free.
Packers and Movers Pune @ http://packersmoverspune.top3rd.in/

 Introduce websocket usage
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-5522
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: framework
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
Priority: Minor

 After a discussion with Ean, was suggested (draft here):
 You need a service that lets you subscribe a widget to an entity and
 then propagate change events to the widget as the entity is modified.
 A generic mechanism like that could eventually expand to be a general
 purpose data bound widgets system that mostly looks like the existing
 system but magically reflects updates.
 Could be used with/for
 * The entity cache and webforms to automatically update views when data 
 changes. 
 * Replaces the current system notes
 * Create a dashboard type pages  (to be discussed futher)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he has 
accepted the new role.
Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable contributions. 
Welcome onboard!

Jacopo

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5522) Introduce websocket usage

2015-03-12 Thread Neeraj kumar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14358520#comment-14358520
 ] 

Neeraj kumar commented on OFBIZ-5522:
-

Packing and shifting of useful products is a maddening and uninteresting 
process. Several projects like overall look, working, unloading and 
transportation have to be done.
Packers and Movers Mumbai @ http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-mumbai/

 Introduce websocket usage
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-5522
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: framework
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
Priority: Minor

 After a discussion with Ean, was suggested (draft here):
 You need a service that lets you subscribe a widget to an entity and
 then propagate change events to the widget as the entity is modified.
 A generic mechanism like that could eventually expand to be a general
 purpose data bound widgets system that mostly looks like the existing
 system but magically reflects updates.
 Could be used with/for
 * The entity cache and webforms to automatically update views when data 
 changes. 
 * Replaces the current system notes
 * Create a dashboard type pages  (to be discussed futher)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Sharan Foga

Congratulations and welcome Deepak!


On 12.3.2015 12:25, Gavin Mabie wrote:

Congratulations Deepak

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:


The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
has accepted the new role.
Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
contributions. Welcome onboard!

Jacopo




Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits
Ron,

I suspect the ASF has the tools/solutions regarding those processes to the
PMC.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
 wrote:

 I thought that we were talking about removing accounts not erasing past
 contributors from all history of the project.

 Is there some great difficulty to adding a committer with the right privs?
 How much karma is encapsulated in the actual account?

 Getting rid of unused accounts seems to be a common recommendation for
 improving security.

 Having an up-to-date list of voters would probably help to clarify the
 results of votes for releases, etc.
 Turning 20% of the eligible voters into 80% by cleaning the enumeration
 list, makes it easier to explain why a release vote was accepted.

 Ron

 On 12/03/2015 9:15 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:

 Hi Pierre
 merit and karma are earned and should not be taken away. If we where to
 remove karma for services and then someone came back how would we track
 what their previous permissions had been, this would leave no guarantee
 that they would have the same permissions they had when they initially
 stepped away for whatever reason.

 -Jake

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I apparently only replied to Jaques. See that message below.


 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM
 Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
 To: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com


 When committers resign on their own accord (for whatever reason) their
 permissions for the tools of the project (JIRA, CONFLUENCE, SVN, etc)
 should be revoked. When they want to be active again, this can easily be
 facilitated.

 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*

 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
 jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:

  Thanks Mark,

 It's quite clear

 Jacques

 Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :

   On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

 Hi Infra Team and All,

 I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
 OFBiz PMC ML.

 Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
 wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
 disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
 if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
 committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
 know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.

 A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
 beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
 security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?

  A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

 It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
 people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

 people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in
 place)
 so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

 It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
 abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

 The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
 is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
 and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
 inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

 I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
 to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
 committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
 recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
 spot changes in their name they did not make.

 More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
 and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
 concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

 Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all
 committers.
 This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused
 committer
 accounts.

 Mark






 --
 Ron Wheeler
 President
 Artifact Software Inc
 email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
 skype: ronaldmwheeler
 phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102




Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Adrian Crum

Congrats Deepak!

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 3/12/2015 11:19 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he has 
accepted the new role.
Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable contributions. 
Welcome onboard!

Jacopo



Upcoming releases according to our tentative schedule

2015-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi all,

according to our tentative schedule published here:

http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html

there are two upcoming releases:

* March - Apache OFBiz 13.07.02
* April - Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 (the last release in the 12.04 series)

I think that the two branches are in good shape and I could start the 
preparation of 13.07.02 now. After that we will prepare the 12.04.06 ones to be 
published in April.

What do you think?

Jacopo



Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits
We're not even talking about removing accounts. That is at ASF level. But
we're talking about revoking permissions.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
 wrote:

 I thought that we were talking about removing accounts not erasing past
 contributors from all history of the project.

 Is there some great difficulty to adding a committer with the right privs?
 How much karma is encapsulated in the actual account?

 Getting rid of unused accounts seems to be a common recommendation for
 improving security.

 Having an up-to-date list of voters would probably help to clarify the
 results of votes for releases, etc.
 Turning 20% of the eligible voters into 80% by cleaning the enumeration
 list, makes it easier to explain why a release vote was accepted.

 Ron

 On 12/03/2015 9:15 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:

 Hi Pierre
 merit and karma are earned and should not be taken away. If we where to
 remove karma for services and then someone came back how would we track
 what their previous permissions had been, this would leave no guarantee
 that they would have the same permissions they had when they initially
 stepped away for whatever reason.

 -Jake

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I apparently only replied to Jaques. See that message below.


 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM
 Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
 To: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com


 When committers resign on their own accord (for whatever reason) their
 permissions for the tools of the project (JIRA, CONFLUENCE, SVN, etc)
 should be revoked. When they want to be active again, this can easily be
 facilitated.

 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*

 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
 jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:

  Thanks Mark,

 It's quite clear

 Jacques

 Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :

   On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

 Hi Infra Team and All,

 I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
 OFBiz PMC ML.

 Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
 wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
 disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
 if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
 committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
 know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.

 A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
 beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
 security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?

  A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

 It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
 people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

 people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in
 place)
 so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

 It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
 abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

 The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
 is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
 and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
 inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

 I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
 to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
 committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
 recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
 spot changes in their name they did not make.

 More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
 and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
 concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

 Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all
 committers.
 This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused
 committer
 accounts.

 Mark






 --
 Ron Wheeler
 President
 Artifact Software Inc
 email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
 skype: ronaldmwheeler
 phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102




Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
I'm with Pierre on this one. The ATS PMC has, as an example, several members 
and committers   who no longer read or reply to emails. We honestly have no 
idea if they are even in control of their  accounts.

Cheers,

-- Leif 



 On Mar 12, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Jake,
 
 I am not talking about removing merit and karma. Such is persisted in many
 ways, think web pages, wiki pages, etc. I am talking about revoking
 permissions at tools levels. That doesn't mean deleting committers
 identities within the ASF.
 
 Ensuring that committers get the same permissions back (or not) is up to
 the PMC of a project to decide.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Pierre Smits
 
 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com
 
 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi Pierre
 merit and karma are earned and should not be taken away. If we where to
 remove karma for services and then someone came back how would we track
 what their previous permissions had been, this would leave no guarantee
 that they would have the same permissions they had when they initially
 stepped away for whatever reason.
 
 -Jake
 
 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 I apparently only replied to Jaques. See that message below.
 
 
 Pierre Smits
 
 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM
 Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
 To: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
 
 
 When committers resign on their own accord (for whatever reason) their
 permissions for the tools of the project (JIRA, CONFLUENCE, SVN, etc)
 should be revoked. When they want to be active again, this can easily be
 facilitated.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Pierre Smits
 
 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com
 
 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
 jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
 
 Thanks Mark,
 
 It's quite clear
 
 Jacques
 
 Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :
 
 On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
 
 Hi Infra Team and All,
 
 I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
 OFBiz PMC ML.
 
 Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
 wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
 disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
 if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
 committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
 know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.
 
 A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
 beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
 security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?
 A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.
 
 It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
 people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.
 
 people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in place)
 so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.
 
 It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
 abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.
 
 The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
 is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
 and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
 inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).
 
 I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
 to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
 committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
 recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
 spot changes in their name they did not make.
 
 More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
 and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
 concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org
 
 Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all committers.
 This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused committer
 accounts.
 
 Mark
 


Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Ron Wheeler
I thought that we were talking about removing accounts not erasing past 
contributors from all history of the project.


Is there some great difficulty to adding a committer with the right privs?
How much karma is encapsulated in the actual account?

Getting rid of unused accounts seems to be a common recommendation for 
improving security.


Having an up-to-date list of voters would probably help to clarify the 
results of votes for releases, etc.
Turning 20% of the eligible voters into 80% by cleaning the enumeration 
list, makes it easier to explain why a release vote was accepted.


Ron

On 12/03/2015 9:15 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:

Hi Pierre
merit and karma are earned and should not be taken away. If we where to
remove karma for services and then someone came back how would we track
what their previous permissions had been, this would leave no guarantee
that they would have the same permissions they had when they initially
stepped away for whatever reason.

-Jake

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:


I apparently only replied to Jaques. See that message below.


Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

-- Forwarded message --
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
To: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com


When committers resign on their own accord (for whatever reason) their
permissions for the tools of the project (JIRA, CONFLUENCE, SVN, etc)
should be revoked. When they want to be active again, this can easily be
facilitated.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:


Thanks Mark,

It's quite clear

Jacques

Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :

  On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

Hi Infra Team and All,

I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
OFBiz PMC ML.

Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.

A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
why a committer account can not be terminated?


A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in place)
so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
spot changes in their name they did not make.

More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all committers.
This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused committer
accounts.

Mark








--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
This is how Deepak looks like today with a very pleasant smile. :-)

http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/Deepak-Dixit-1.jpg
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/Deepak-Dixit-2.jpg

Many Congratulations Deepak!!

--
Kind Regards
Ashish Vijaywargiya
HotWax Systems - est. 1997

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

 The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
 has accepted the new role.
 Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
 contributions. Welcome onboard!

 Jacopo


Re: Upcoming releases according to our tentative schedule

2015-03-12 Thread Adrian Crum
Some of the Commons libraries have new releases that include bug fixes, 
so it would be nice to get those in. I am aware of Validator and DHCP.


Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 3/12/2015 2:31 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

Hi all,

according to our tentative schedule published here:

http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html

there are two upcoming releases:

* March - Apache OFBiz 13.07.02
* April - Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 (the last release in the 12.04 series)

I think that the two branches are in good shape and I could start the 
preparation of 13.07.02 now. After that we will prepare the 12.04.06 ones to be 
published in April.

What do you think?

Jacopo



Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Jake Farrell
Hi Pierre
merit and karma are earned and should not be taken away. If we where to
remove karma for services and then someone came back how would we track
what their previous permissions had been, this would leave no guarantee
that they would have the same permissions they had when they initially
stepped away for whatever reason.

-Jake

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I apparently only replied to Jaques. See that message below.


 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM
 Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
 To: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com


 When committers resign on their own accord (for whatever reason) their
 permissions for the tools of the project (JIRA, CONFLUENCE, SVN, etc)
 should be revoked. When they want to be active again, this can easily be
 facilitated.

 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
 jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:

 Thanks Mark,

 It's quite clear

 Jacques

 Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :

  On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

 Hi Infra Team and All,

 I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
 OFBiz PMC ML.

 Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
 wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
 disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
 if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
 committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
 know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.

 A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
 beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
 security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?

 A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

 It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
 people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

 people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in place)
 so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

 It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
 abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

 The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
 is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
 and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
 inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

 I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
 to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
 committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
 recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
 spot changes in their name they did not make.

 More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
 and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
 concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

 Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all committers.
 This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused committer
 accounts.

 Mark







Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Arun Patidar

Many Congratulations Deepak!!!

Thanks  Regards
---
Arun Patidar
Manager,Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Media
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Thursday 12 March 2015 04:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he has 
accepted the new role.
Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable contributions. 
Welcome onboard!

Jacopo




Fwd: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits
This bounced.
Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

-- Forwarded message --
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
To: jfarr...@apache.org
Cc: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org, infrastruct...@apache.org 
infrastruct...@apache.org, dev@ofbiz.apache.org dev@ofbiz.apache.org, 
d...@community.apache.org d...@community.apache.org


Hi Jake,

I am not talking about removing merit and karma. Such is persisted in many
ways, think web pages, wiki pages, etc. I am talking about revoking
permissions at tools levels. That doesn't mean deleting committers
identities within the ASF.

Ensuring that committers get the same permissions back (or not) is up to
the PMC of a project to decide.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi Pierre
 merit and karma are earned and should not be taken away. If we where to
 remove karma for services and then someone came back how would we track
 what their previous permissions had been, this would leave no guarantee
 that they would have the same permissions they had when they initially
 stepped away for whatever reason.

 -Jake

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I apparently only replied to Jaques. See that message below.


 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM
 Subject: Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?
 To: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com


 When committers resign on their own accord (for whatever reason) their
 permissions for the tools of the project (JIRA, CONFLUENCE, SVN, etc)
 should be revoked. When they want to be active again, this can easily be
 facilitated.

 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
 jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:

 Thanks Mark,

 It's quite clear

 Jacques

 Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :

  On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

 Hi Infra Team and All,

 I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
 OFBiz PMC ML.

 Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
 wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
 disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
 if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
 committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
 know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.

 A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
 beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
 security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?

 A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

 It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
 people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

 people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in place)
 so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

 It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
 abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

 The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
 is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
 and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
 inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

 I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
 to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
 committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
 recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
 spot changes in their name they did not make.

 More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
 and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
 concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

 Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all committers.
 This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused committer
 accounts.

 Mark








[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6145) Purchase return shipment issuance greater than ATP error

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)
Christian Carlow created OFBIZ-6145:
---

 Summary: Purchase return shipment issuance greater than ATP error
 Key: OFBIZ-6145
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6145
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow


This error occurred when issuing received purchase order inventory to a return 
shipment:
Not issuing Order Item Ship Group Inventory Reservation to shipment 10096 
because the quantity to issue 1 is greater than the quantity left to issue for 
order order item inventoryItem 

IssuanceServices.xml issueInventoryItemToShipment service checks that the 
inventoryItem ATP is greater than the return quantity submitted which fails 
when sales backorder qty of the product is greater than the purchase receipt 
qty.

To reproduce:
1.  Create a sales order for 100 of a product
2.  Create a purchase order for 10 of the same product
3.  Receive the purchase order inventory
4.  Create a purchase order return then accept it
5.  Click the Create Return Shipment button that appears once the return is 
accepted
6.  Update the shipment to create and navigate to the shipment order items page
7.  Issue qty of the inventory item received for purchase order to get the error



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6142) returnItems.ftl freemarker null error when returnPrice or returnQuantity is null

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6142:

Attachment: OFBIZ-6142.patch

Updated patch again to prevent OrderView.groovy getReturnableItems error which 
prevents page from displaying when returnQuantity gets set to blank due to 
getReturnableQuantity in OrderReturnServices.java.

 returnItems.ftl freemarker null error when returnPrice or returnQuantity is  
 null
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-6142
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6142
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: order
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: OFBIZ-6142.patch


 This error message:
 FreeMarker template error: The following has evaluated to null or missing: 
 == null [in template 
 component://order/webapp/ordermgr/return/returnItems.ftl at line 155, 
 column 48]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6142) returnItems.ftl freemarker null error when returnPrice or returnQuantity is null

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6142:

Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-6142.patch)

 returnItems.ftl freemarker null error when returnPrice or returnQuantity is  
 null
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-6142
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6142
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: order
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow
Priority: Minor

 This error message:
 FreeMarker template error: The following has evaluated to null or missing: 
 == null [in template 
 component://order/webapp/ordermgr/return/returnItems.ftl at line 155, 
 column 48]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: Upcoming releases according to our tentative schedule

2015-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
This is a good point, thanks Adrian.
Did you mean DBCP?

Jacopo


On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com 
wrote:

 Some of the Commons libraries have new releases that include bug fixes, so it 
 would be nice to get those in. I am aware of Validator and DHCP.
 
 Adrian Crum
 Sandglass Software
 www.sandglass-software.com
 
 On 3/12/2015 2:31 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 according to our tentative schedule published here:
 
 http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html
 
 there are two upcoming releases:
 
 * March - Apache OFBiz 13.07.02
 * April - Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 (the last release in the 12.04 series)
 
 I think that the two branches are in good shape and I could start the 
 preparation of 13.07.02 now. After that we will prepare the 12.04.06 ones to 
 be published in April.
 
 What do you think?
 
 Jacopo
 



[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6146) LookupInventoryItem not functional

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)
Christian Carlow created OFBIZ-6146:
---

 Summary: LookupInventoryItem not functional
 Key: OFBIZ-6146
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Reporter: Christian Carlow


LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
lacks search options leading to empty results.

This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which employs 
the lookup.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6146) LookupInventoryItem not functional

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6146:

Description: 
LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
lacks search options leading to empty results.

This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which employs 
the lookup.

It should be implemented based on the existing lookups which use form widgets 
rather than FTL files.

  was:
LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
lacks search options leading to empty results.

This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which employs 
the lookup.


 LookupInventoryItem not functional
 --

 Key: OFBIZ-6146
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Reporter: Christian Carlow

 LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
 implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
 lacks search options leading to empty results.
 This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which 
 employs the lookup.
 It should be implemented based on the existing lookups which use form widgets 
 rather than FTL files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6146) LookupInventoryItem not functional

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14359076#comment-14359076
 ] 

Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-6146:
-

LookupInventoryItems.ftl is no longer used and can probably be removed.  
LookupInventoryItems.groovy is also no longer used but did contain logic to 
look for the orderId which may still need to be integrated in the functionality.

 LookupInventoryItem not functional
 --

 Key: OFBIZ-6146
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Reporter: Christian Carlow
 Attachments: OFBIZ-6146.patch


 LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
 implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
 lacks search options leading to empty results.
 This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which 
 employs the lookup.
 It should be implemented based on the existing lookups which use form widgets 
 rather than FTL files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6146) LookupInventoryItem not functional

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6146:

Attachment: OFBIZ-6146.patch

This is a starting point for the InventoryItem lookup functionality.  
Additional fields may need to be added to be considered complete.

 LookupInventoryItem not functional
 --

 Key: OFBIZ-6146
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6146
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Reporter: Christian Carlow
 Attachments: OFBIZ-6146.patch


 LookupInventoryItem is not functional.  The dropdown results are not 
 implemented and the popup is implemented by LookupInventoryItems.ftl which 
 lacks search options leading to empty results.
 This was encountered for OFBIZ-6145 for purchase return issuance which 
 employs the lookup.
 It should be implemented based on the existing lookups which use form widgets 
 rather than FTL files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Anahita Goljahani
Hi Deepak,

many congratulations! Very nice pics!!

Anahita

2015-03-12 15:23 GMT+01:00 Ashish Vijaywargiya 
ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxsystems.com:

 This is how Deepak looks like today with a very pleasant smile. :-)

 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/Deepak-Dixit-1.jpg
 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/Deepak-Dixit-2.jpg

 Many Congratulations Deepak!!

 --
 Kind Regards
 Ashish Vijaywargiya
 HotWax Systems - est. 1997

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

  The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
  has accepted the new role.
  Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
  contributions. Welcome onboard!
 
  Jacopo



[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6145) Purchase return shipment issuance greater than ATP error

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6145:

Attachment: OFBIZ-6145.patch

This patch replaces the inventoryItem availableToPromiseTotal check with 
quantityOnHandTotal.  Once the issuance succeeds the availableToPromiseTotal is 
correctly deducted but the corresponding 
inventoryItemShipGrpInvRes.quantityNotAvailable is not deducted so extra logic 
is probably needed for that.  InventoryItem.accountingQuantityTotal is also not 
updated which might be needed also.

 Purchase return shipment issuance greater than ATP error
 

 Key: OFBIZ-6145
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6145
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: product
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow
 Attachments: OFBIZ-6145.patch


 This error occurred when issuing received purchase order inventory to a 
 return shipment:
 Not issuing Order Item Ship Group Inventory Reservation to shipment 10096 
 because the quantity to issue 1 is greater than the quantity left to issue 
 for order order item inventoryItem 
 IssuanceServices.xml issueInventoryItemToShipment service checks that the 
 inventoryItem ATP is greater than the return quantity submitted which fails 
 when sales backorder qty of the product is greater than the purchase receipt 
 qty.
 To reproduce:
 1.  Create a sales order for 100 of a product
 2.  Create a purchase order for 10 of the same product
 3.  Receive the purchase order inventory
 4.  Create a purchase order return then accept it
 5.  Click the Create Return Shipment button that appears once the return is 
 accepted
 6.  Update the shipment to create and navigate to the shipment order items 
 page
 7.  Issue qty of the inventory item received for purchase order to get the 
 error



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: Upcoming releases according to our tentative schedule

2015-03-12 Thread Adrian Crum

lol - yes, thanks for the clarification.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 3/12/2015 3:03 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

This is a good point, thanks Adrian.
Did you mean DBCP?

Jacopo


On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com 
wrote:


Some of the Commons libraries have new releases that include bug fixes, so it 
would be nice to get those in. I am aware of Validator and DHCP.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 3/12/2015 2:31 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

Hi all,

according to our tentative schedule published here:

http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html

there are two upcoming releases:

* March - Apache OFBiz 13.07.02
* April - Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 (the last release in the 12.04 series)

I think that the two branches are in good shape and I could start the 
preparation of 13.07.02 now. After that we will prepare the 12.04.06 ones to be 
published in April.

What do you think?

Jacopo





[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6147) setInvoiceStatus causes incorrect header information when an error occurs

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Carlow (JIRA)
Christian Carlow created OFBIZ-6147:
---

 Summary: setInvoiceStatus causes incorrect header information when 
an error occurs
 Key: OFBIZ-6147
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6147
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Christian Carlow
Priority: Minor


When viewing an invoice at accounting/control/invoiceOverview, if a status 
change button is clicked and fails, the invoice header incorrectly displays the 
status as the one to which it failed to update and the description disappears.  
Its fairly minor but worth fixing eventually.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
 Hi Infra Team and All,
 
 I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
 OFBiz PMC ML.
 
 Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
 wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
 disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
 if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
 committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
 know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.
 
 A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
 beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
 security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?

A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in place)
so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
spot changes in their name they did not make.

More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all committers.
This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused committer
accounts.

Mark



Re: jira spam

2015-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Le 24/02/2015 09:34, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Thanks Hans,

I have removed the comment.

Please infra team could you remove the top3rdjaiho Jira user? Thanks!

Jacques

Le 24/02/2015 08:44, Hans Bakker a écrit :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?focusedCommentId=14334519page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14334519 



S/he (or more surely it, a bot) did it again, 1 hour ago in the same OFBIZ-5522.
I guess it's a bot, because it does not make sense for a human to make several 
same comments, even for a spammer
And last time it was also on this issue. So could be based on websocket word?

Nobody knows about a Jira spammer bot?

In any case, please infra team could you remove the ns5219139 Jira user?

I will then remove the comments, in case they help investigating before

Thanks!

Jacques




Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Thanks Mark,

It's quite clear

Jacques

Le 12/03/2015 11:59, Mark Thomas a écrit :

On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

Hi Infra Team and All,

I have a question I wonder for some time and recently discussed in our
OFBiz PMC ML.

Committers come and go. When a PMC member resign, because s/he clearly
wants to stop helping on the project and want to be completely
disconnect from it, her/his committer account remains active. I wonder
if this is not an useless security hole. Same for no longer active
committers. The difference with an active committer is s/he will never
know since s/he is possibly no longer monitoring things.

A credential can be abused by an external person, that can be the
beginning of much troubles we can not all imagine (hackers do)... With
security holes you never know, until it bites you, so I really wonder
why a committer account can not be terminated?

A committer account on its own can do very little in the way of harm.

It can (if you know which hoops to jump through) get shell access to
people.a.o and it can send e-mail from an @apache.org e-mail address.

people.a.o is locked down (and infra has additional monitoring in place)
so the risk here is sufficiently small infra is happy with it.

It terms of sending e-mail via an @apache.org e-mail address, if it is
abusive (i.e. spammy) then we do rely on folks reporting it to us.

The PMC is responsible for granting (and revoking) commit access. There
is nothing (of a technical nature - you'll have to answer to the board
and your community for the social aspects) stopping you removing
inactive committers from the appropriate LDAP group(s).

I'd add that the PMC is responsible for reviewing all the commits made
to the PMC's repositories. You are expected to spot if a long inactive
committer suddenly starts making changes or an account you don't
recognise makes changes. Likewise, active committers are expected to
spot changes in their name they did not make.

More generally, if infra has a security concern we shut stuff down
and/or lock accounts first and ask questions later. Any security
concerns should be reported immediately to r...@apache.org

Finally, infra periodically enforces password resets for all committers.
This has the helpful side-effect of effectively locking unused committer
accounts.

Mark




Re: Why are committers accounts never terminated?

2015-03-12 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
 I would liked to add to Mark's answer that just because a volunteer steps 
away, they still have the merit and karma they earned.  Life sometimes gets in 
the way but we want volunteers to be able to step back into things.  I have 
also never heard of anyone misusing karma granted on return.

So I would think it extraordinary to remove commit access.  You never know when 
they might be back or another tlp takes their interest.

They could lose there credentials which Mark has covered but otherwise I hope I 
have explained more of the ideology behind they why.
Regards,
KAM

On March 12, 2015 6:59:57 AM EDT, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 12/03/2015 09:50, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
 Hi Infra Team and All,
 
 I really wonder
 why a committer account can not be terminated?

Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Congrats Deepak, welcome on board :)

Jacques

Le 12/03/2015 12:19, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he has 
accepted the new role.
Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable contributions. 
Welcome onboard!

Jacopo



[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5522) Introduce websocket usage

2015-03-12 Thread Neeraj kumar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14358524#comment-14358524
 ] 

Neeraj kumar commented on OFBIZ-5522:
-

These procedures seem straightforward but in real they are complex and 
topsy-turvy one.
Packers and Movers Hyderabad @ 
http://www.expert5th.in/packers-and-movers-hyderabad/

 Introduce websocket usage
 -

 Key: OFBIZ-5522
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5522
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: framework
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
Priority: Minor

 After a discussion with Ean, was suggested (draft here):
 You need a service that lets you subscribe a widget to an entity and
 then propagate change events to the widget as the entity is modified.
 A generic mechanism like that could eventually expand to be a general
 purpose data bound widgets system that mostly looks like the existing
 system but magically reflects updates.
 Could be used with/for
 * The entity cache and webforms to automatically update views when data 
 changes. 
 * Replaces the current system notes
 * Create a dashboard type pages  (to be discussed futher)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Gavin Mabie
Congratulations Deepak

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

 The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
 has accepted the new role.
 Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
 contributions. Welcome onboard!

 Jacopo


Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits
Congratulations, Deepak!

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Gavin Mabie kwikst...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congratulations Deepak

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

  The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
  has accepted the new role.
  Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
  contributions. Welcome onboard!
 
  Jacopo



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Divesh Dutta
Congratulations Deepak :)

Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gavin Mabie kwikst...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congratulations Deepak

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

  The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
  has accepted the new role.
  Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
  contributions. Welcome onboard!
 
  Jacopo



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Nitesh Goyal
Many congratulations Deepak!

​
​
-- 

Thanks  Regards
Nitesh Goyal
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
www.hotwaxsystems.com​

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gavin Mabie kwikst...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congratulations Deepak

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

  The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
  has accepted the new role.
  Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
  contributions. Welcome onboard!
 
  Jacopo



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Mridul Pathak
Congratulations Deepak and welcome!!

--
Thanks  Regards,
Mridul Pathak
Senior Manager
HotWax Systems
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com

 On Mar 12, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:
 
 The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he has 
 accepted the new role.
 Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable contributions. 
 Welcome onboard!
 
 Jacopo



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Vishal Chhabria
Congratulations Deepak !!

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gavin Mabie kwikst...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congratulations Deepak

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

  The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
  has accepted the new role.
  Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
  contributions. Welcome onboard!
 
  Jacopo



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Rishi Solanki
Many congratulations Deepak !!! :)


Rishi Solanki
Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nitesh Goyal 
nitesh.go...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

 Many congratulations Deepak!

 ​
 ​
 --

 Thanks  Regards
 Nitesh Goyal
 HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
 www.hotwaxsystems.com​

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gavin Mabie kwikst...@gmail.com wrote:

  Congratulations Deepak
 
  On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
  jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:
 
   The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
   has accepted the new role.
   Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
   contributions. Welcome onboard!
  
   Jacopo
 



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Congratulations, we hope the new additions would contribute to a better,
happier, more productive ofbiz community. Best of luck!

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Rishi Solanki rishisolan...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Many congratulations Deepak !!! :)


 Rishi Solanki
 Manager, Enterprise Software Development
 HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
 Direct: +91-9893287847
 http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nitesh Goyal 
 nitesh.go...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

  Many congratulations Deepak!
 
  ​
  ​
  --
 
  Thanks  Regards
  Nitesh Goyal
  HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
  www.hotwaxsystems.com​
 
  On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gavin Mabie kwikst...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
   Congratulations Deepak
  
   On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
   jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:
  
The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and
 he
has accepted the new role.
Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
contributions. Welcome onboard!
   
Jacopo
  
 



Re: Welcome to Deepak Dixit as new committer!

2015-03-12 Thread Anil Patel
Deepak,
Welcome aboard.

Regards
Anil Patel


Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
COO
Hotwax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/
ApacheCon US 2014 Silver Sponsor
http://na.apachecon.com/sponsor/our-sponsors


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:

 The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak Dixit to become a new committer and he
 has accepted the new role.
 Deepak, thank you for your continued commitment and valuable
 contributions. Welcome onboard!

 Jacopo


Re: Groovy at Apache

2015-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/groovy_submitted_to_become_a


On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Mridul Pathak mridul.pat...@hotwaxsystems.com 
wrote:

 That’s a great news.
 
 --
 Thanks  Regards,
 Mridul Pathak
 Senior Manager
 HotWax Systems
 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
 
 On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Pranay Pandey pranay.pan...@hotwaxsystems.com 
 wrote:
 
 Good one.
 On Mar 4, 2015 9:49 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya 
 ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxsystems.com wrote:
 
 Wow, Excellent news!! Thanks for sharing it Jacques. :-)
 
 Kind Regards
 Ashish Vijaywargiya
 HotWax Systems - est. 1997
 
 On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:14 PM, jler...@apache.org jler...@apache.org
 wrote:
 
 Forwarded FYI
 
 Jacques
 
  Message transféré 
 Sujet : Groovy at Apache
 Date :  Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:16:52 +0100
 De :Cédric Champeau cedric.champ...@gmail.com
 Pour :  elecha...@apache.org, bdelacre...@apache.org, Guillaume Laforge
 
 glafo...@gmail.com, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org, Paul King 
 pa...@asert.com.au
 Copie à :   amania...@apache.org, r...@apache.org, ebo...@apache.org,
 jler...@apache.org
 
 
 
 Hi everyone!
 
 On behalf of the Groovy team, I am pleased to announce that we are going
 to submit a proposal to join the ASF. Thank you very much for the time
 you
 spent to answer our questions or concerns, and who knows maybe some of
 you
 will be willing to become mentors for the project?
 
 The decision will be made public soon, we wanted to let you know before
 the news goes out.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Cédric
 
 
 
 
 
 



[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6143) Incorporate the readme for the projectmgr component

2015-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-6143:

Attachment: OFBIZ-6143-ProjectMgr-README.patch

This patch is a first attempt to address the issue. Feedback is welcome.

 Incorporate the readme for the projectmgr component
 ---

 Key: OFBIZ-6143
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6143
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Pierre Smits
Assignee: Pierre Smits
 Attachments: OFBIZ-6143-ProjectMgr-README.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)