Re: std::stringstream aStrStream
On 18.04.2013 04:51, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
Hello,
Thanks you, I have already changed the string as you said me. This is the
result:
::rtl::OUString aName ( aEdtName.GetText() );
And then I put this code
std::stringstream aStrStream;
aStrStream \nThis is aName and aName
genial! std::endl;
_STL::cout aStrStream.str();
The building was successful, but does not print whole aStrStream. Only this
part:
This is
http://imagebin.org/254440
OUString is a UTF-16 string. That means that when it is created from an
ASCII string then every second byte is '\0'. That means that
aStrStream \nThis is aName ...
is basically equivalent to
aStrStream \nThis is '\0' ...
Therfore everything after \nThis is is cut off. To fix this you have to
replace
aName
with
::rtl::OUStringToOString(aName, RTL_TEXTENCODING_ASCII_US).getStr()
You may want to use a small method to make this more readable:
namespace
{
sal_Char* o2a (const ::rtl::OUString rsText)
{
return ::rtl::OUStringToOString(rsText,
RTL_TEXTENCODING_ASCII_US).getStr();
}
}
and then
aStrStream \nThis is o2a(aName) ...
[I did not compile this, there may be typos in this]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64
Hi On 18.04.2013 00:28, Albino B Neto wrote: Hi I did it all again, look[1]. 1 - http://pastebin.com/mnB26Rk3 The information presented at the linked web resource does not show the error in module sw. But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7
Hi, On 18.04.2013 09:35, build...@apache.org wrote: Hi! , The aoo-win7 builder has just completed a run STATUS: Failure Build revision 1468973 on branch openoffice/trunk Snapshot results at: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Build using the ASF buildslave: bb-win7 Build results at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/579 Build reason was: The Nightly scheduler named 'aoo-win7-nightly' triggered this build I had a look at the build error. It occurs in module sw due to a removed Slot and not exiting appropriate build dependencies regarding such changes inside the module. The current workaround - until the build dependency regarding Slot changes are solved - is to make a clean build of module sw. This can be done by performing commando 'make clean' inside module sw. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: GSOC 2013
I was glancing the dev guide: I read that PyUNO has not been used much and might contain which have not been tested. Since I'm good at both java and python, I thought I'll use JAVA as my coding language for building this extension. Any thoughts about this? Also, XComponentLoader.loadComponentFromURL() function is used to load files from harddisk. Can this function open only native OpenOffice formats or other format files like .xls .docx can also be opened from this method? On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On 4/17/13, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rajath Shashidhara rajaths.raja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Mr. Alexandro Colorado, Ariel Constela-Haile suggested that one who suggested the idea on GSOC idea page is the mentor for that project. So I'm contacting you for help. I have a problem. I thought that the mentor will be the best guy to discuss with. Hi Rajath, I'm a mentor on a different AOO proposal, but I mentored GSoC last year as well, so maybe I can help a little here by sharing some high level thoughts. My end-semester exams are starting from April 25th. So I will not be able to spend a lot of time for the coming days.(till May 12th). As the mentoring organizations will announce the list of students by April 22nd, I wanted to know what more I can do to prove myself that I'm a capable candidate for GSOC 2013. I have worked on two bugs on your page till now. IMHO, this is very good. We all know that it is a very busy time for students now, with exams, etc. So the fact that you made this much progress is a good thing. I have partially solved one of them(got response from a people that I have done the right thing to solve the bug), although I was unable to produce a patch due to my tight schedule. My holidays are starting from May13th, I'll be able to spend a lot of time on this later. I am getting used to your huge code base, and during my holidays I'll be able to work on this with more ease as time passes. Yes. My suggestion to your proposal: We could also add a feature called Import from Google SpreadSheet and Export to Google SpreadSheet which adds the feature of cloud storage to openoffice!. Also I wanted some suggestion on writing my application. Should I include the above suggestion in it? I will draft my application and please suggest any modifications to it. With my students I look for a well-thought out proposal. The ideas that we post from Apache are just the starting point. In a proposal you might include: 1) Some background information about you and your programming experience. 2) A summary of your proposed technical solution, i.e., a high-level design. 3) A project plan. That plan might dedicate some time to detailed, time to coding and test, and maybe a wrap up effort at the end to improve documentation. The proposal is whatever you want to do this summer. The idea we mentors posted are just starting points, ideas for your consideration. But you should adapt them as you wish. So I'd recommend working on the proposal now. +1 I agree with Rob. Regards, -Rob Please help me! I am very excited about being a part of your community!!! -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani
Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64
On 17.04.2013 21:22, Albino B Neto wrote: 2013/4/17 Albino B Neto bino...@gmail.com: When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by running: build --all:sw When I running command buid --all:sw, look: == build -- version: 275224 Cannot determine source directory/repository for /home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main at /home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main/solenv/bin/build.pl line 1151 == You first have to change your directory to main/instsetoo_native before you build. Try this: cd /home/albino/projetos/aoo/source/main/instsetoo_native build --all:sw -Andre Albino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: GSOC 2013
Him On 18.04.2013 10:09, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: I was glancing the dev guide: I read that PyUNO has not been used much and might contain which have not been tested. Since I'm good at both java and python, I thought I'll use JAVA as my coding language for building this extension. Any thoughts about this? Also, XComponentLoader.loadComponentFromURL() function is used to load files from harddisk. Can this function open only native OpenOffice formats or other format files like .xls .docx can also be opened from this method? As far as I know you can load all types of files via this function which also can be loaded via the user interface. Best regards, Oliver. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On 4/17/13, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rajath Shashidhara rajaths.raja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Mr. Alexandro Colorado, Ariel Constela-Haile suggested that one who suggested the idea on GSOC idea page is the mentor for that project. So I'm contacting you for help. I have a problem. I thought that the mentor will be the best guy to discuss with. Hi Rajath, I'm a mentor on a different AOO proposal, but I mentored GSoC last year as well, so maybe I can help a little here by sharing some high level thoughts. My end-semester exams are starting from April 25th. So I will not be able to spend a lot of time for the coming days.(till May 12th). As the mentoring organizations will announce the list of students by April 22nd, I wanted to know what more I can do to prove myself that I'm a capable candidate for GSOC 2013. I have worked on two bugs on your page till now. IMHO, this is very good. We all know that it is a very busy time for students now, with exams, etc. So the fact that you made this much progress is a good thing. I have partially solved one of them(got response from a people that I have done the right thing to solve the bug), although I was unable to produce a patch due to my tight schedule. My holidays are starting from May13th, I'll be able to spend a lot of time on this later. I am getting used to your huge code base, and during my holidays I'll be able to work on this with more ease as time passes. Yes. My suggestion to your proposal: We could also add a feature called Import from Google SpreadSheet and Export to Google SpreadSheet which adds the feature of cloud storage to openoffice!. Also I wanted some suggestion on writing my application. Should I include the above suggestion in it? I will draft my application and please suggest any modifications to it. With my students I look for a well-thought out proposal. The ideas that we post from Apache are just the starting point. In a proposal you might include: 1) Some background information about you and your programming experience. 2) A summary of your proposed technical solution, i.e., a high-level design. 3) A project plan. That plan might dedicate some time to detailed, time to coding and test, and maybe a wrap up effort at the end to improve documentation. The proposal is whatever you want to do this summer. The idea we mentors posted are just starting points, ideas for your consideration. But you should adapt them as you wish. So I'd recommend working on the proposal now. +1 I agree with Rob. Regards, -Rob Please help me! I am very excited about being a part of your community!!! -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
Hi Em 17/04/2013 21:08, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org escreveu: If we want I can put a poll up on http://openofficesurvey.org. Rob, isn't better use this service in side of our domain? Some thing like survey.OpenOffice.org? My two cents... ;-) Best regards Claudio
Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Em 17/04/2013 21:08, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org escreveu: If we want I can put a poll up on http://openofficesurvey.org. Rob, isn't better use this service in side of our domain? Some thing like survey.OpenOffice.org? My two cents... ;-) No objections is someone wants to have a month-long wrestling match with Infra to get something like this set up. But I was able to get it set up on my server in 30 minutes, including buying the domain from GoDaddy for $7.00. -Rob Best regards Claudio
[CODE]: 3layer drop part 1 is integrated
Hi, a further notice for you. I have integrated the first chunk of changes to get rid of the 3layer. I would like to include these change in the QA process during the regression tests. I have built and checked the office several times on Windows, MacOS and Linux. I synchronized regular to trunk and I and repeated my checks. Feedback from other volunteers were positive as well. The normal user won't be affected ideally by this change ;-) If somebody made any assumption about the internal directory structure please take a closer look on the office now and adapt you solution accordingly. The internal structure is implementation detail and can change at any time. The next step is to finish the SDK changes and testing. Future cleanup work for compiler/linker flags, used variables in makefile, scp files will be done later. I comment out many things instead of changing/deleting and keep the comments for later use. This is mainly for easier cleanup work later. My plan was to document the changes on a wiki page but I haven't done this yet. I will do that as soon as I have time for it. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
On 18 April 2013 13:13, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Em 17/04/2013 21:08, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org escreveu: If we want I can put a poll up on http://openofficesurvey.org. Rob, isn't better use this service in side of our domain? Some thing like survey.OpenOffice.org? My two cents... ;-) No objections is someone wants to have a month-long wrestling match with Infra to get something like this set up. But I was able to get it set up on my server in 30 minutes, including buying the domain from GoDaddy for $7.00. Infra is not always that bad, they work hard, but if one asks nicely things normally get done quickly. The new translate-vm2 was up and running 24hours after I asked for it. Where would like survey.openoffice.org to point to ? rgds Jan I. -Rob Best regards Claudio
Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)
Hi 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Oliver, sorry by my newbie ask, but... we don't use more dmake? If i understood correctly, build is a perl script that calls all modules, building in order of dependence, entering in each one, calling Dmake to compile and delivering all files where need. I saw some makefile files and many more makefile.mk, where i think that one is for Make and other is to Dmake. I see it in wiki too, for build parts. In long term, we will migrate to Make or continue with this hibrid(?) model? Cheers, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)
On 18 April 2013 14:08, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Oliver, sorry by my newbie ask, but... we don't use more dmake? If i understood correctly, build is a perl script that calls all modules, building in order of dependence, entering in each one, calling Dmake to compile and delivering all files where need. correct. I saw some makefile files and many more makefile.mk, where i think that one is for Make and other is to Dmake. I see it in wiki too, for build parts. again correct. Problem is that some of the modules have been moved away from dmake to gbuild, so right now it is a mix (and not a very smart one). In long term, we will migrate to Make or continue with this hibrid(?) model? Yes, at the moment we have a branch called gbuild with very little activity. You can find a lot of description on wiki about gbuild. There are also ongoing work, to use standard make and a much simpler structure (no perl build), but this is not something you will see until after the 4.0 (and problaly 4.1) release. Once a complete is ready it will be published and hopefully discussed on this list. rgds jan I. Cheers, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
Hi 2013/4/18, janI j...@apache.org: On 18 April 2013 13:13, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: No objections is someone wants to have a month-long wrestling match with Infra to get something like this set up. But I was able to get it set up on my server in 30 minutes, including buying the domain from GoDaddy for $7.00. My thinking is about the use of pseudodomains using the name of OpenOffice. Sure that we know who works in the project and who are the people, but (IMHO) is important join all services under the same domain. Infra is not always that bad, they work hard, but if one asks nicely things normally get done quickly. The new translate-vm2 was up and running 24hours after I asked for it. Some times, they have a hard lot of work that gives for us this impression. As I already have helped in the infra of BrOffice, I know how hard is them work, but one time that the home is clean is more easy (and responsive) they work/reply for our requests. Where would like survey.openoffice.org to point to ? Direct to point, Janl. ;-) We can redirect the domain to your server, Rob, and after to migrate to Apache servers when possible. Bests, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[CODE, UNO API] UNO commands .uno:FlipHorizonal and .uno.FlipVertical - behavior corrected
Hi, by fixing issue 122026 [1] I have corrected the behavior of the UNO commands .uno:FlipHorizontal and .uno.FlipVertical. Until AOO 3.4.1 UNO command .uno:FlipHorizontal could be used to flip _vertically_ a Writer graphic while UNO command .uno:FlipVertical could be used to flip _horizontal_ a Writer graphic. With the integration of sidebar feature these UNO commands are no available in Draw/Impress, Calc and Writer for Drawing graphics. This the changes made for issue 122026 the behavior has been corrected, too: - .uno:FlipHorizontal can be used to flip a graphic horizontally. - .uno.FlipVertical can be used to flip a graphic vertically. Please consider the correction to these UNO commands in case your are using them in your extension and/or macro. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122026 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/4/18, janI j...@apache.org: On 18 April 2013 13:13, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: No objections is someone wants to have a month-long wrestling match with Infra to get something like this set up. But I was able to get it set up on my server in 30 minutes, including buying the domain from GoDaddy for $7.00. My thinking is about the use of pseudodomains using the name of OpenOffice. Sure that we know who works in the project and who are the people, but (IMHO) is important join all services under the same domain. Infra is not always that bad, they work hard, but if one asks nicely things normally get done quickly. The new translate-vm2 was up and running 24hours after I asked for it. Some times, they have a hard lot of work that gives for us this impression. As I already have helped in the infra of BrOffice, I know how hard is them work, but one time that the home is clean is more easy (and responsive) they work/reply for our requests. Where would like survey.openoffice.org to point to ? Direct to point, Janl. ;-) We can redirect the domain to your server, Rob, and after to migrate to Apache servers when possible. Directing to my server is easy. Apache needs to create the survey.openoffice.org subdomain and set the DNS A record to point to 67.20.112.98. -Rob Bests, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
2013/4/18 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com: Hi Hi. Where would like survey.openoffice.org to point to ? Direct to point, Janl. ;-) We can redirect the domain to your server, Rob, and after to migrate to Apache servers when possible. +1 Albino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: draft blog post: With Special Guest Star... Apache OpenOffice
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:48:10 -0400 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=with_special_guest_star_apache This is time-sensitive, so I'd like to get this out this afternoon. Send it out - it's non controversial! -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
test aoo4
Hello I hope to test AOO4 I am on Ubuntu 12.10 64bits I try to install AOO4. Problem with installation debian-menus -- Librement, *Sylvain DENIS* /_*Expert TIC, FLOSS WEB*_/ _Mon gsm :_ +32 (0)499 219 802 _Mon identifiant SIP :_ sylvaindenis _Mon adresse SIP :_ sylvainde...@ippi.fr _Mon numéro SIP :_ 889431260 _Mon website :_ http://www.denis-sylvain.be --- /Évitez l'utilisation des protocoles propriétaires. Utilisez Jitsi https://jitsi.org/ et prenez un compte SIP gratuit sur IPPI https://www.ippi.fr/
Re: draft blog post: With Special Guest Star... Apache OpenOffice
Send it out. rgds jan I On 18 April 2013 17:57, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:48:10 -0400 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=with_special_guest_star_apache This is time-sensitive, so I'd like to get this out this afternoon. Send it out - it's non controversial! -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: draft blog post: With Special Guest Star... Apache OpenOffice
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=with_special_guest_star_apache This is time-sensitive, so I'd like to get this out this afternoon. Thanks! -Rob Go Tessa! Go AOO! and dang, sorry I missed this episode! :/ Yep, good to go! -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: test aoo4
2013/4/18 Sylvain DENIS sylvain.tech...@gmail.com Hello I hope to test AOO4 I am on Ubuntu 12.10 64bits I try to install AOO4. Problem with installation debian-menus -- Librement, *Sylvain DENIS* /_*Expert TIC, FLOSS WEB*_/ _Mon gsm :_ +32 (0)499 219 802 _Mon identifiant SIP :_ sylvaindenis _Mon adresse SIP :_ sylvainde...@ippi.fr _Mon numéro SIP :_ 889431260 _Mon website :_ http://www.denis-sylvain.be --- /Évitez l'utilisation des protocoles propriétaires. Utilisez Jitsi https://jitsi.org/ et prenez un compte SIP gratuit sur IPPI https://www.ippi.fr/ Hi -- A while back, a few of us just tried installing the freedesktop menu setup (also, and it seemed to work fine. I *think* Ubuntu uses freedesktop, so you might try this instead of the indigenous Debian menus. If you do, please let us know how this worked for you. -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: draft blog post: With Special Guest Star... Apache OpenOffice
Very good! I have a couple of editing suggestions, if it is not too late. The line Those with access (and this may has geo-based access restrictions) can see scene starting at the 8:50 mark on ABC's online version of the episodehttp://abc.go.com/watch/suburgatory/SH55126593/VDKA0_2durzflg/apocalypse-meow. Should be Those with access (and this may have geo-based access restrictions) can see the scene starting at the 8:50 mark on ABC's online version of the episodehttp://abc.go.com/watch/suburgatory/SH55126593/VDKA0_2durzflg/apocalypse-meow . Francis On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=with_special_guest_star_apache This is time-sensitive, so I'd like to get this out this afternoon. Thanks! -Rob Go Tessa! Go AOO! and dang, sorry I missed this episode! :/ Yep, good to go! -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: draft blog post: With Special Guest Star... Apache OpenOffice
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:08 PM, F C. Costero fjcc.apa...@gmail.com wrote: Very good! I have a couple of editing suggestions, if it is not too late. The line Those with access (and this may has geo-based access restrictions) can see scene starting at the 8:50 mark on ABC's online version of the episode http://abc.go.com/watch/suburgatory/SH55126593/VDKA0_2durzflg/apocalypse-meow . Should be Those with access (and this may have geo-based access restrictions) can see the scene starting at the 8:50 mark on ABC's online version of the episode http://abc.go.com/watch/suburgatory/SH55126593/VDKA0_2durzflg/apocalypse-meow . Fixed. Thanks. -Rob Francis On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=with_special_guest_star_apache This is time-sensitive, so I'd like to get this out this afternoon. Thanks! -Rob Go Tessa! Go AOO! and dang, sorry I missed this episode! :/ Yep, good to go! -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: test aoo4
2013/4/18 Sylvain DENIS sylvain.tech...@gmail.com: Problem with installation debian-menus This bug [1]. 1 - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122080 Albino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64
2013/4/18 Albino B Neto bino...@gmail.com: And is running now the command build --all:sw, on directory main/instsetoo_native More error [1]. 1 - http://pastebin.com/HsCwnQRq I ran the command, but, still show error. Albino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Official survey service? (Was: Re: Conversation: Pick A Logo)
janI wrote: On 18 April 2013 13:13, Rob Weir wrote: If we want I can put a poll up on http://openofficesurvey.org. Where would like survey.openoffice.org to point to ? Indeed, let's avoid using unofficial domains when we can redirect an official subdomain. Redirecting the DNS won't pose a big burden on Infra and just requires (lazy) consensus here. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64
On Apr 18, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: 2013/4/18 Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz: Paste more so we see the actual error and not the message that there is an error in instsetoo_native ;-) Sorry :-P Look: http://pastebin.com/2NNAcKwt https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121469 -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Blind Accessibility
Hi, We've just had a feedback about the latest snapshot of OOo. It seems that the user has a problem using with Windows 8 and NVDA beta. Is that a known situation? The user doesn't has Symphony installed on his computer and not JBA. He tried running as admin. Thanks for your answer. Regards, JPM On mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 11:17:29 (+0800), Steve Yin wrote: Hi Jean, Thanks for your work! The current build of the branch ia2 is a developing version and ready for UI testing only. So all the issues you found will be fixed gradually in the future versions. Now we are working on the document level and will update the branch periodically. And we plan to finished the main work of the IAccessible2 migration before November. Then the branch will be integrated into the trunk. I think the localization work is in the scope of the trunk. So you will not have to localize it by yourself. Thanks. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL mengualjean...@free.fr wrote: Hf, I did my 1st test today. Indeed it works fine. 2 categories of questions: is it possible to localize such release or not yet? Besides, the fact that the characters formatting isn't recognized, the navigating in the tables is not yet perfect: are they issues related to assistive technologies? Or could OOo make progress such features? Thanks anyway for this great work. If I can localize, I think I'm going to use OOo on Windows more often. So far I only use it on Linux. Regards, JPM On samedi 30 mars 2013 à 22:05:18 (+0800), Steve Yin wrote: Jean, Welcome! It is very nice that you can join testing work and provide feedback. There is a branch named ia2 which is for AOO IAccessible2 development use. The development work is still in progress. You can download the branch install package (binary for Windows) from http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#w7ia2 and see what we have done from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+IAccessible2. Thanks for your support! On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL mengualjean...@free.fr wrote: Hi, I'm very happy to know that people like Steve and Jennifer plan to deal with accessibility in OOo. I had submitted the fssue 1,5 year ago; it's very cool if things are in progress. Thanks! For me, I especially can help you by testing and doing feedbacks. Is there some URL to download the release in test? This URL will involve and be updated at this link? Is that a binary? Well. I'd be happy to support this work. Thanks again Steve to code for this issue! Best regards, JPM On samedi 23 mars 2013 à 22:17:04 (+0800), Steve Yin wrote: Thanks Andrea! You are a considerate person : ) On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Forwarding the answer below to Jennifer, who may have missed the answer since it seems she's not subscribed to the list. Andrea On 22/03/2013 Steve Yin wrote: Hi Jennifer, Welcome! My name is Steve Yin. I am working on the IAccessible2 migration for AOO Windows version. You can read our plan and get some useful information here: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** AOO+4.0+IAccessible2 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+IAccessible2 . Thanks. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Doitblind Jennifer McKinley j...@doitblind.com wrote: Hi, My name is Jennifer McKinley. I am the co-founder of Do It Blind. My business partner, John Martyn, and I would like to work with Open Office to make it blind accessible. We have already developed scripts for other very popular programs like iTunes, Rhapsody, and Spotify. Please visit doitblind.com for more information on them. Who can we speak with in regards to making Open Office blind accessible? Please email me or call me. We appreciate your time. Thank you! Jennifer McKinley Co-Founder, Do It Blind, LLC doitblind.com 505-382-2641 --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Best Regards, Steve Yin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --
Re: Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:17 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 April 2013 14:08, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Oliver, sorry by my newbie ask, but... we don't use more dmake? If i understood correctly, build is a perl script that calls all modules, building in order of dependence, entering in each one, calling Dmake to compile and delivering all files where need. correct. I saw some makefile files and many more makefile.mk, where i think that one is for Make and other is to Dmake. I see it in wiki too, for build parts. again correct. Problem is that some of the modules have been moved away from dmake to gbuild, so right now it is a mix (and not a very smart one). Jan -- This last comment not a very smart one is interesting. Do you care to elaborate? I saw all this mixture too in my build experience, and well...couldn't figure out why. It seems historically dmake was used to speed things along, but, well...I'm not sure how/why it's being used now exactly. And, yes, I saw the gbuild branch was basically inactive and tried to tract down some info on that, but couldn't find much discussion about it. We do indeed need to devote discussion time to our build process after 4.0. I would hope we could at least make things simpler for folks wanting to partial builds of areas. In long term, we will migrate to Make or continue with this hibrid(?) model? Yes, at the moment we have a branch called gbuild with very little activity. You can find a lot of description on wiki about gbuild. There are also ongoing work, to use standard make and a much simpler structure (no perl build), but this is not something you will see until after the 4.0 (and problaly 4.1) release. Once a complete is ready it will be published and hopefully discussed on this list. rgds jan I. Cheers, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)
On 18 April 2013 22:38, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:17 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 April 2013 14:08, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Oliver, sorry by my newbie ask, but... we don't use more dmake? If i understood correctly, build is a perl script that calls all modules, building in order of dependence, entering in each one, calling Dmake to compile and delivering all files where need. correct. I saw some makefile files and many more makefile.mk, where i think that one is for Make and other is to Dmake. I see it in wiki too, for build parts. again correct. Problem is that some of the modules have been moved away from dmake to gbuild, so right now it is a mix (and not a very smart one). Jan -- This last comment not a very smart one is interesting. Do you care to elaborate? I have to watch more carefully what I write, someone is actually reading it :-) I am deep in the building system at the moment with my l10n work, and what we have now in trunk is approx 2/3 orignal dmake (that btw also seem to have at least 2 generations) and 1/3 gbuild, this combination does a good job of confusing anyone who tries to understand the system. Just to make things worse, the gbuild part is split in as many files as possible. So I should have written dont try to understand it, just accept it, actually someone else in here said something similar to me a couple of month ago. I saw all this mixture too in my build experience, and well...couldn't figure out why. It seems historically dmake was used to speed things along, but, well...I'm not sure how/why it's being used now exactly. Actually the wiki/gbuild have a pretty good description. The people who started gbuild did a real good job of analyzing the dmake build and an even better job of documenting their findings. I am right now (slowly) in the progress of writing a document, with demands to a solid, easy to understand build system, based on my experience from a system about 4-5 times bigger than AOO. And, yes, I saw the gbuild branch was basically inactive and tried to tract down some info on that, but couldn't find much discussion about it. We do indeed need to devote discussion time to our build process after 4.0. I would hope we could at least make things simpler for folks wanting to partial builds of areas. In my world, we can make it VERY simple...but even though gbuild is pretty new, it uses the same philosofy as dmake, so it does not really change things. I have a couple of ideas, admitted a bit radical, but they would allow us to use standard make. My intention is to take the discussion, when I have something to present, instead of starting the discussion with a piece of blank paper. Another thing we need to discuss is packaging, would it not be ideal if people could just make writer, when working on that. I would like to see a download page, where the user select which parts of AOO he/she wants to download. I hope you like to appetizer :-) rgds Jan I. In long term, we will migrate to Make or continue with this hibrid(?) model? Yes, at the moment we have a branch called gbuild with very little activity. You can find a lot of description on wiki about gbuild. There are also ongoing work, to use standard make and a much simpler structure (no perl build), but this is not something you will see until after the 4.0 (and problaly 4.1) release. Once a complete is ready it will be published and hopefully discussed on this list. rgds jan I. Cheers, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: Spam on extensions website
Spam again: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/recent_updated - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Setup OpenOffice as a Windows Server service
Dear OpenOffice Development, I would like to ask an OpenOffice question: previously we linked you OpenOffice 3.1, 32-bit into our old Windows Server 2008 Standard and setup OpenOffice 3.1 as a server service to read and parse .doc, .docx document files into our PhP software. Hence, whenever web users upload their .doc, .docx files, we sent it to Windows Server 2008 service and return the content of the MS Word file, working very well through MS Word 97-2003 until Word 2010. PROBLEM: Now we discovered that you just develop a newer version OpenOffice 3.4, 64-bit and we change to use a new Windows Server 2012 64-bit. But may you check this for us: when I setup your newest version 64-bit OpenOffice 3.4 as a Windows Server 2012 service called OO, this OO service could not start with error: Windows could not start the OO service on Local Computer. Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. What is changing in the settings of your newest version 64-bit OpenOffice 3.4 and Windows Server 2012? Currently, I just set it as before on the old Windows Server 2008 Application: C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenOffice.org 3\program\soffice.exe AppParameters:-headless -accept=socket,port=2002;urp; Urgently, I would like to appreciate in advance, Yours sincerely, Le Quan Ha Description: small_clear_logo Canwrx Group Ltd 1407, 240-70 Shawville Blvd SE, Calgary, AB T2Y 2Z3 (Mailing address) 220-11625 Elbow Drive SW, Calgary, AB T2W 1G8 (Physical address) PH: 403 508 2719 FX: 403 508 2698 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Re: Setup OpenOffice as a Windows Server service
you should look into the code that was produced by Laurent Godard few years back. OOoConv http://oooconv.free.fr/index_en.html On 4/18/13, Le Quan Ha h...@canwrx.com wrote: Dear OpenOffice Development, I would like to ask an OpenOffice question: previously we linked you OpenOffice 3.1, 32-bit into our old Windows Server 2008 Standard and setup OpenOffice 3.1 as a server service to read and parse .doc, .docx document files into our PhP software. Hence, whenever web users upload their .doc, .docx files, we sent it to Windows Server 2008 service and return the content of the MS Word file, working very well through MS Word 97-2003 until Word 2010. PROBLEM: Now we discovered that you just develop a newer version OpenOffice 3.4, 64-bit and we change to use a new Windows Server 2012 64-bit. But may you check this for us: when I setup your newest version 64-bit OpenOffice 3.4 as a Windows Server 2012 service called OO, this OO service could not start with error: Windows could not start the OO service on Local Computer. Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. What is changing in the settings of your newest version 64-bit OpenOffice 3.4 and Windows Server 2012? Currently, I just set it as before on the old Windows Server 2008 Application: C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenOffice.org 3\program\soffice.exe AppParameters:-headless -accept=socket,port=2002;urp; Urgently, I would like to appreciate in advance, Yours sincerely, Le Quan Ha Description: small_clear_logo Canwrx Group Ltd 1407, 240-70 Shawville Blvd SE, Calgary, AB T2Y 2Z3 (Mailing address) 220-11625 Elbow Drive SW, Calgary, AB T2W 1G8 (Physical address) PH: 403 508 2719 FX: 403 508 2698 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] AOO forum in pt-br
2013/4/18 Albino B Neto bino...@gmail.com Hi I would like to propose a forum PT-BR[1]. Why not a generic Portuguese forum instead of a Brazilian focused one? The Spanish forum, for example, covers all Spain and Latin American users. Also, a better time-zone coverage helps to fight spam ;) Other than that, a +1 from me: every step that makes our community greater and more comfortable is welcomed. 1 - forum.openoffice.org/pt-br/forum/ We have a general geral-ptbr@, but it would be an interesting forum also. But I think it would be an option for us, as there is in Brazil users who prefer it. I can be adm/mod. It's better to start with at least two persons as active moderators. That could be the admin and one general moderator, for example. Otherwise, there is a high risk of ending with a big lock like the VI forums: spam is a *real* problem. Regards Ricardo Albino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 April 2013 22:38, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:17 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 April 2013 14:08, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Oliver, sorry by my newbie ask, but... we don't use more dmake? If i understood correctly, build is a perl script that calls all modules, building in order of dependence, entering in each one, calling Dmake to compile and delivering all files where need. correct. I saw some makefile files and many more makefile.mk, where i think that one is for Make and other is to Dmake. I see it in wiki too, for build parts. again correct. Problem is that some of the modules have been moved away from dmake to gbuild, so right now it is a mix (and not a very smart one). Jan -- This last comment not a very smart one is interesting. Do you care to elaborate? I have to watch more carefully what I write, someone is actually reading it :-) yes, we do that sometimes! :) I am deep in the building system at the moment with my l10n work, and what we have now in trunk is approx 2/3 orignal dmake (that btw also seem to have at least 2 generations) and 1/3 gbuild, this combination does a good job of confusing anyone who tries to understand the system. Just to make things worse, the gbuild part is split in as many files as possible. So I should have written dont try to understand it, just accept it, actually someone else in here said something similar to me a couple of month ago. I saw all this mixture too in my build experience, and well...couldn't figure out why. It seems historically dmake was used to speed things along, but, well...I'm not sure how/why it's being used now exactly. Actually the wiki/gbuild have a pretty good description. The people who started gbuild did a real good job of analyzing the dmake build and an even better job of documenting their findings. I am right now (slowly) in the progress of writing a document, with demands to a solid, easy to understand build system, based on my experience from a system about 4-5 times bigger than AOO. Great! I look forward to it! Although I have *used* make systems a lot throughout my career, I've never ever constructed one, so much of this is a mystery to me. And, yes, I saw the gbuild branch was basically inactive and tried to tract down some info on that, but couldn't find much discussion about it. We do indeed need to devote discussion time to our build process after 4.0. I would hope we could at least make things simpler for folks wanting to partial builds of areas. In my world, we can make it VERY simple...but even though gbuild is pretty new, it uses the same philosofy as dmake, so it does not really change things. I have a couple of ideas, admitted a bit radical, but they would allow us to use standard make. My intention is to take the discussion, when I have something to present, instead of starting the discussion with a piece of blank paper. Another thing we need to discuss is packaging, would it not be ideal if people could just make writer, when working on that. I would like to see a download page, where the user select which parts of AOO he/she wants to download. I hope you like to appetizer :-) So far, what you say makes very good sense to me. I'm happy you've started in this direction. rgds Jan I. In long term, we will migrate to Make or continue with this hibrid(?) model? Yes, at the moment we have a branch called gbuild with very little activity. You can find a lot of description on wiki about gbuild. There are also ongoing work, to use standard make and a much simpler structure (no perl build), but this is not something you will see until after the 4.0 (and problaly 4.1) release. Once a complete is ready it will be published and hopefully discussed on this list. rgds jan I. Cheers, Claudio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy
Re: draft blog post: Visualizing the AOO Dev List
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=visualizing_the_aoo_dev_list Regards, -Rob Wonderful and nice to see this got published. -- MzK There's no upside in screwing with things you can't explain. -- Captain Roy Montgomery, Castle
Re: Setup OpenOffice as a Windows Server service
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Le Quan Ha h...@canwrx.com wrote: Dear OpenOffice Development, ** ** I would like to ask an OpenOffice question: previously we linked you OpenOffice 3.1, 32-bit into our old Windows Server 2008 Standard and setup OpenOffice 3.1 as a server service to read and parse .doc, .docx document files into our PhP software. Hence, whenever web users upload their .doc, .docx files, we sent it to Windows Server 2008 service and return the content of the MS Word file, working very well through MS Word 97-2003 until Word 2010. ** ** PROBLEM: Now we discovered that you just develop a newer version OpenOffice 3.4, 64-bit and we change to use a new Windows Server 2012 64-bit. But may you check this for us: when I setup your newest version 64-bit OpenOffice 3.4 as a Windows Server 2012 service called OO, this OO service could not start with error: ** First, Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 has 64-bit version for Linux only. The Windows version is available only in a 32-bit version. Second, you are changing two variables at once: the version of Windows and the version of OpenOffice. So it is hard to tell which is causing the problem. If at all possible it would be good to try one of two things: 1) Run OpenOffice 3.4.1 on your old Windows 2008 server, and see if that works. or 2) Run OpenOffice 3.1 on your new Windows 2012 server. ** “Windows could not start the OO service on Local Computer. Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion.” ** Maybe the message is familiar to someone else in the community? Let's give it a few more hours. Regards, -Rob ** What is changing in the settings of your newest version 64-bit OpenOffice 3.4 and Windows Server 2012? Currently, I just set it as before on the old Windows Server 2008 Application: “C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenOffice.org 3\program\soffice.exe” AppParameters:“-headless -accept=socket,port=2002;urp;” ** ** Urgently, I would like to appreciate in advance, Yours sincerely, *Le Quan Ha* *[image: Description: small_clear_logo]* *Canwrx Group Ltd* *1407, 240-70 Shawville Blvd SE, Calgary, AB T2Y 2Z3 (Mailing address)* 220-11625 Elbow Drive SW, Calgary, AB T2W 1G8 (Physical address) *PH: *403 508 2719 *FX: *403 508 2698** ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ** **
Re: draft blog post: With Special Guest Star... Apache OpenOffice
On 4/18/2013 11:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=with_special_guest_star_apache This is time-sensitive, so I'd like to get this out this afternoon. Great! Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Handlers in Drawing
Thanks regina, I have been reading this code. It is very interesting, now just beginning to find that piece of code, I can see the points that allow you to manipulate the shapes. And Hello Armin, how I can see the changes you've done? I have to download it from Subversion? Regards, Alan 2013/4/16 Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com Hi Alan, Regina already points to the correct places; the interactions are quite 'hand-made' in the code and it's old stuff. I changed modt of it to work on an overlay mechanism to allow previews during interactions, and added/refined some stuff. Be also informed that I'm about to change all that stuff (together with other stuff) to double precision handling (currently on integer, 1/100th mm resp. twips in SW). So be informed that that code is already sublect to heavy changes (see http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openoffice/branches/alg/**aw080http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/alg/aw080), so I would not recomment to touch it until that part is done. Investigation and experimenting is of course welcome, so welcome to the Drawinglayer ;-) Sincerely, Armin On 13.04.2013 13:15, Regina Henschel wrote: Hello Alan, Alan Eduardo Puc Pech schrieb: Hello Regina, I would like to know which file in the source code of AOO, manipulate shapes in Draw. Because I want to learn the operation of that file. For example when I create a circle. the points to which I can manipulate and change its size. That is clear now. You will find this in a Sdr?View. Look at the hierarchy of that classed in http://opengrok.adfinis-**sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-** trunk/main/svx/inc/svx/**svdview.hxxhttp://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/svx/inc/svx/svdview.hxx I'm no professional developer and have not worked in that part of the code. Perhaps someone else can give a better answer and correct me where I'm wrong. But I guess you will find some relevant things about getting the handle in SdrMarkView http://opengrok.adfinis-**sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-** trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/**svdmrkv.cxxhttp://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/svdmrkv.cxxand for the actions itself in SdrEditView http://opengrok.adfinis-**sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-** trunk/main/svx/inc/svx/**svdedtv.hxxhttp://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/svx/inc/svx/svdedtv.hxx The changes on the object itself are in http://opengrok.adfinis-** sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-**trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/xref/aoo-trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/ Kind regards Regina --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- ALG --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Building Guide
Hello, I suggest a change in the building guide: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step In the last step: sudo dpkg -i unxlngx6.pro/OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/*.deb sudo dpkg -i unxlngx6.pro/OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration/openoffice.org3.4-debian-menus_3.4-9593_all.deb Should be changed to: sudo dpkg -i unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/*.deb sudo dpkg -i unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration/openoffice.org3.4-debian-menus_3.4-9593_all.deb -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani
Re: Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)
On 4/19/13 12:33 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 April 2013 22:38, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:17 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 April 2013 14:08, Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: But regarding the removed Slot FN_PROPERTY_WRAP_DLG perform a clean build of module sw: - cd sw - make clean - build Oliver, sorry by my newbie ask, but... we don't use more dmake? If i understood correctly, build is a perl script that calls all modules, building in order of dependence, entering in each one, calling Dmake to compile and delivering all files where need. correct. I saw some makefile files and many more makefile.mk, where i think that one is for Make and other is to Dmake. I see it in wiki too, for build parts. again correct. Problem is that some of the modules have been moved away from dmake to gbuild, so right now it is a mix (and not a very smart one). Jan -- This last comment not a very smart one is interesting. Do you care to elaborate? I have to watch more carefully what I write, someone is actually reading it :-) yes, we do that sometimes! :) I am deep in the building system at the moment with my l10n work, and what we have now in trunk is approx 2/3 orignal dmake (that btw also seem to have at least 2 generations) and 1/3 gbuild, this combination does a good job of confusing anyone who tries to understand the system. Just to make things worse, the gbuild part is split in as many files as possible. So I should have written dont try to understand it, just accept it, actually someone else in here said something similar to me a couple of month ago. Exactly that is the problem, the work on gbuild is not yet finished and we have a mix of gnu make and dmake. The gbuild is the outcome of an analysis how to improve the build system. I believe it is not bad and our friends from LO have more or less finished the work but I also believe that it is too complex and can be done much simpler. It's nearly impossible to debug and not easy to understand. It tried to hide the complexity from single makefiles in the modules and introduced soe kind of new scripting language based on gnu make. I am not sure if that was the best approach. I saw all this mixture too in my build experience, and well...couldn't figure out why. It seems historically dmake was used to speed things along, but, well...I'm not sure how/why it's being used now exactly. Actually the wiki/gbuild have a pretty good description. The people who started gbuild did a real good job of analyzing the dmake build and an even better job of documenting their findings. I am right now (slowly) in the progress of writing a document, with demands to a solid, easy to understand build system, based on my experience from a system about 4-5 times bigger than AOO. Great! I look forward to it! Although I have *used* make systems a lot throughout my career, I've never ever constructed one, so much of this is a mystery to me. Me too and we can can benefit from something that we understand better and that is potentially not so generic but where makefiles are readable. And, yes, I saw the gbuild branch was basically inactive and tried to tract down some info on that, but couldn't find much discussion about it. We do indeed need to devote discussion time to our build process after 4.0. I would hope we could at least make things simpler for folks wanting to partial builds of areas. In my world, we can make it VERY simple...but even though gbuild is pretty new, it uses the same philosofy as dmake, so it does not really change things. I have a couple of ideas, admitted a bit radical, but they would allow us to use standard make. My intention is to take the discussion, when I have something to present, instead of starting the discussion with a piece of blank paper. I am looking forward to hear, read or see more Another thing we need to discuss is packaging, would it not be ideal if people could just make writer, when working on that. I would like to see a download page, where the user select which parts of AOO he/she wants to download. I hope you like to appetizer :-) So far, what you say makes very good sense to me. I'm happy you've started in this direction. of course it make sense and is not really a new idea. But when you look closer you will see that the difference in the end is not really huge. But a simplified packaging process would be highly appreciated. I believe there is a lot of room for improvements, especially when we remove all the special cases that we no longer need. This would probably help us to provide a good working patch mechanism. The idea of dynamic packaging is an interesting one especially when I think about localized version. Most of the stuff is the same and
