Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013-07-23 Thread Andre Fischer

On 22.07.2013 20:31, imacat wrote:

On 2013/07/20 06:26, Juergen Schmidt said:

Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2013 um 19:46 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Dave Fisher wrote:

On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:09 AM, janI wrote:

It is in principle no good, that a single person decides if a vote is valid
or not, it sort of invalidates the idea of voting.

 Hmm... ^^;  I did not notice this following discussion.

 I suppose we are counting the votes, not the comments after the
votes.  That is, whether I comment as for the release blocker # or
for missing the Traditional Chinese version or bc'z I'm krazzzy
is irrelevant to my vote.  The interpretation of the comments belong to
the [DISCUSS] thread, not to this [VOTE] thread.


I absolutely agree.  Andrea already updated the vote result 
accordingly.  Maybe we can sort things like the reason for you -1 before 
the vote.


-Andre



 So please still count me as -1, although this does not affect the
result of the votes.  I have to present my position as a member of our
local community.

 Nevertheless, this release is great!  It's really pity for me not
able to involve in the process of this release.  Thanks to Juergen and
everybody on your hard work on this release.


imacat's VOTE was not a Veto as you cannot veto a release.



Enough misunderstandings here (I think that Jan was saying: Juergen
cannot decide by himself whether a -1 is valid...).

Anyway, let's update the tally to 24 +1 votes (14 binding) and 1 -1
vote (imacat, binding) and move on.

As Juergen already wrote, we remain committed to make the traditional
Chinese version available at the earliest occasion, it is already at
100% but it simply came too late to build/include it. In the meantime,
it will be available as snapshot build.



do whatever you want, from my point of view imacat voted on something that 
wasn't part of the vote. It remains an invalid vote for me.

Juergen

Regards,
Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org










-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013-07-22 Thread imacat
On 2013/07/20 06:26, Juergen Schmidt said:
 Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2013 um 19:46 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
 Dave Fisher wrote:
 On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:09 AM, janI wrote:
 It is in principle no good, that a single person decides if a vote is valid
 or not, it sort of invalidates the idea of voting.

Hmm... ^^;  I did not notice this following discussion.

I suppose we are counting the votes, not the comments after the
votes.  That is, whether I comment as for the release blocker # or
for missing the Traditional Chinese version or bc'z I'm krazzzy
is irrelevant to my vote.  The interpretation of the comments belong to
the [DISCUSS] thread, not to this [VOTE] thread.

So please still count me as -1, although this does not affect the
result of the votes.  I have to present my position as a member of our
local community.

Nevertheless, this release is great!  It's really pity for me not
able to involve in the process of this release.  Thanks to Juergen and
everybody on your hard work on this release.



 imacat's VOTE was not a Veto as you cannot veto a release.



 Enough misunderstandings here (I think that Jan was saying: Juergen 
 cannot decide by himself whether a -1 is valid...).

 Anyway, let's update the tally to 24 +1 votes (14 binding) and 1 -1 
 vote (imacat, binding) and move on.

 As Juergen already wrote, we remain committed to make the traditional 
 Chinese version available at the earliest occasion, it is already at 
 100% but it simply came too late to build/include it. In the meantime, 
 it will be available as snapshot build.


 
 do whatever you want, from my point of view imacat voted on something that 
 wasn't part of the vote. It remains an invalid vote for me.
 
 Juergen

 Regards,
 Andrea.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


 
 
 


-- 
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc

Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013-07-19 Thread Donald Whytock
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote:

 The vote period to release the RC2 (based on release branch AOO40,
 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended.

 The ballot result in 24 votes, 24 +1 votes including 14 binding PMC
 member votes.

 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot
 closed successful to release the RC2 as AOO 4.0

 Vote tally

 +1 Jan Iversen (binding)
 +1 Keith McKenna
 +1 Olaf Felka
 +1 Sylvain Denis
 +1 Marco A.G. Pinto
 +1 V Stuart Foote
 +1 Samer Mansour
 +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding)
 +1 Rory O'Farrell
 +1 Rob Weir (binding)
 +1 Shengfeng Liu
 +1 Kay Schenk (binding)
 +1 Marcus Lange (binding)
 +1 Regina Henschel (binding)
 +1 Andrew Rist (binding)
 +1 Donald Harbison (binding)
 +1 Xuacu
 +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding)
 +1 Yuzhen Fan
 +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding)
 +1 Armin Le Grand (binding)
 +1 Herbert Duerr (binding)
 +1 Kazunari Hirano (binding)
 +1 Andre Fischer (binding)

 Thanks

 Juergen


Imacat voted -1.  Is he non-binding?

Don


Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013-07-19 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 7/19/13 5:07 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 The vote period to release the RC2 (based on release branch AOO40,
 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended.

 The ballot result in 24 votes, 24 +1 votes including 14 binding PMC
 member votes.

 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot
 closed successful to release the RC2 as AOO 4.0

 Vote tally

 +1 Jan Iversen (binding)
 +1 Keith McKenna
 +1 Olaf Felka
 +1 Sylvain Denis
 +1 Marco A.G. Pinto
 +1 V Stuart Foote
 +1 Samer Mansour
 +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding)
 +1 Rory O'Farrell
 +1 Rob Weir (binding)
 +1 Shengfeng Liu
 +1 Kay Schenk (binding)
 +1 Marcus Lange (binding)
 +1 Regina Henschel (binding)
 +1 Andrew Rist (binding)
 +1 Donald Harbison (binding)
 +1 Xuacu
 +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding)
 +1 Yuzhen Fan
 +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding)
 +1 Armin Le Grand (binding)
 +1 Herbert Duerr (binding)
 +1 Kazunari Hirano (binding)
 +1 Andre Fischer (binding)

 Thanks

 Juergen


 Imacat voted -1.  Is he non-binding?
 

the vote was not valid from my perspective because she voted on
something that was part of the vote. I haven't count it but of course it
would not change the result. And I believe imacat made it clear in a
later response.

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013-07-19 Thread Dave Fisher

On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:09 AM, janI wrote:

 On 19 July 2013 17:11, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 7/19/13 5:07 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 The vote period to release the RC2 (based on release branch AOO40,
 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended.
 
 The ballot result in 24 votes, 24 +1 votes including 14 binding PMC
 member votes.
 
 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot
 closed successful to release the RC2 as AOO 4.0
 
 Vote tally
 
 +1 Jan Iversen (binding)
 +1 Keith McKenna
 +1 Olaf Felka
 +1 Sylvain Denis
 +1 Marco A.G. Pinto
 +1 V Stuart Foote
 +1 Samer Mansour
 +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding)
 +1 Rory O'Farrell
 +1 Rob Weir (binding)
 +1 Shengfeng Liu
 +1 Kay Schenk (binding)
 +1 Marcus Lange (binding)
 +1 Regina Henschel (binding)
 +1 Andrew Rist (binding)
 +1 Donald Harbison (binding)
 +1 Xuacu
 +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding)
 +1 Yuzhen Fan
 +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding)
 +1 Armin Le Grand (binding)
 +1 Herbert Duerr (binding)
 +1 Kazunari Hirano (binding)
 +1 Andre Fischer (binding)
 
 Thanks
 
 Juergen
 
 
 Imacat voted -1.  Is he non-binding?
 
 
 the vote was not valid from my perspective because she voted on
 something that was part of the vote. I haven't count it but of course it
 would not change the result. And I believe imacat made it clear in a
 later response.
 
 
 Hi
 
 I know it does not change anything, but imacat did not withdraw her -1, so
 it should be in the tally for the record. The vote is binding and should be
 counted.
 
 It is in principle no good, that a single person decides if a vote is valid
 or not, it sort of invalidates the idea of voting.

imacat's VOTE was not a Veto as you cannot veto a release. Since it was not a 
VETO situation there is no invalidation.

Please count her VOTE as (binding)

In a sense this is different from Rapheal's -1 which was agreed by acclamation 
once the flaw was obvious.

Thank you.

 
 rgds
 jan I.
 
 
 
 
 Juergen
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013-07-19 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2013 um 19:46 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
 Dave Fisher wrote:
  On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:09 AM, janI wrote:
   It is in principle no good, that a single person decides if a vote is 
   valid
   or not, it sort of invalidates the idea of voting.
   
  
  imacat's VOTE was not a Veto as you cannot veto a release.
  
 
 
 Enough misunderstandings here (I think that Jan was saying: Juergen 
 cannot decide by himself whether a -1 is valid...).
 
 Anyway, let's update the tally to 24 +1 votes (14 binding) and 1 -1 
 vote (imacat, binding) and move on.
 
 As Juergen already wrote, we remain committed to make the traditional 
 Chinese version available at the earliest occasion, it is already at 
 100% but it simply came too late to build/include it. In the meantime, 
 it will be available as snapshot build.
 
 

do whatever you want, from my point of view imacat voted on something that 
wasn't part of the vote. It remains an invalid vote for me.

Juergen
 
 Regards,
 Andrea.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org