Re: [dev] bugs in WordML import

[Laurent Godard]

Hi stefan

thanks for your contribution
that's really great :)

the structure of openoffice.org is a little bit confuse to me. so i 
followed your indication and opened some of my issues (65441, 65442, 
65447, 65456 and 65457) in the xml-project. but in the end i found the 
sources to be fixed in the "filter"-repository that seems to belong to 
the framework-project. hope the issues will be redirected.




I think that xml-guys will manage it :)

Btw, may i suggest you some organizational topic
it would be easier for dev that with handle these issues to have them
- in one single issue as it deals with the same feature (hey, correct me 
 if i'm wrong) and make title more centered on WordML filter to allow 
easy identifying

- please attach the diff file to the issue, not copy it as a commentary

Again Stefan thanks a lot for your contribution

Laurent

--
Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org
Indesko >> http://www.indesko.com
Nuxeo CPS >> http://www.nuxeo.com - http://www.cps-project.org
Livre "Programmation OpenOffice.org", Eyrolles 2004

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] bugs in WordML import

[Stefan Ziel]

hi mathias,

the structure of openoffice.org is a little bit confuse to me. so i 
followed your indication and opened some of my issues (65441, 65442, 
65447, 65456 and 65457) in the xml-project. but in the end i found the 
sources to be fixed in the "filter"-repository that seems to belong to 
the framework-project. hope the issues will be redirected.


best regards
stefan

Mathias Bauer escreveu:

Stefan Ziel wrote:


hi,

i found an fixed various bugs in the XSLT-Inputfilter for WordML 
(wordml2ooo.xsl ...) how can i retribute this especially to which 
subproject ?


The appropriate project would be the XML project. The easiest way is to
create an issue and attach your fix as a patch, but of course you can
discuss the fix and possible candidates for being the owner of the issue
on the dev@xml.openoffice.org mailing list before, if you like.

BTW: thanks for finding and fixing the bugs. ;-)

Best regards,
Mathias



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] Changing icons on quickstarter menu

[Chris H]

All,

I want to change the application icons on the quickstarter, on Windows. 
I want to replace the Writer icon with a MS Word like icon, etc. Does 
quickstarter use an .ico file for those app icons or a png file from the 
RES folder?


Thanks,

--Chris

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] Documentation Scripts Java Wrong

[Danilo Batista de Queiroz]

Hi, I found in documentation for scripts with Java and BeanShell that the
environment uses a context variable, but using scripts BeanShell I had to
use a variable XSCRIPTCONTEXT and I had to import
com.sun.star.script.framework.XScriptContext and not
drafts.com.sun.star.script.framework.XScriptContext in the file unoil.jar if
I'm not mistaken.

I'm using OpenOffice version 2.

 

Danilo Queiroz

Analista Programador

5018-5155 ramal 5130

 

[dev] New Developer Article Contest

[Louis Suarez-Potts]

All,

New Winner, Developer Article Contest
S. Sevki Dincer has won April's Developer Article Contest;  
congratulations! Sevki's article "is a step by step guide on how to  
write a simple component (a Calc add-in) for OpenOffice.org (OOo) in C 
++."


The Developer Article Contest continues each month. Winners receive  
USD $750 plus invaluable attention and the gratification of helping  
others. Read our wiki on the matter for more information and start  
writing! The next deadline is the end of this month.


Cheers,

The OpenOffice.org Team

URLs

* Sevki Dincer's "Simple Calc Add-In", wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/SimpleCalcAddIn>


* Developer Article Contest page,





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[KAMI]

Hi Gurus!

Charles-H. Schulz írta:

Hello all,

(cutting the previous thread for the sake of clarity).
I wish to appease this debate but weigh in it as well.

:o) It is not a cruel debate :o)
While it's true that OpenOffice.org "Premium" is a rather unfortunate 
name in a marketing sense (it really sounds like something you 
actually pay),
The "Premium" word  is something better in my world ... But I am open 
for any cool name suggestion...
and while I certainly see the advantages of bundling OOo with extra 
fonts and templates

me too and other users too
, I wonder what you do concerning the promotion of the actual 
OpenOffice.org software in Hungary.
The promotion is coordinated by FSF.hu Foundation. They for to spread 
free softwares in Hungary including OpenOffice.org. I try to do my best 
and I communicate with the Hungarian media about OpenOffice.org. There 
is not to much progression here. We haven't got money to advertise our 
free world in wide, but lots of media get informed about OpenOffice.org 
related news. All of IT related mags release our news, the suite is in 
the printed medias' DVD/CD set. Over the IT mags we haven't too big 
name. They are not interested in... With the Get legal campaign I would 
like to create some posters to make Openoffice.org more known. Of course 
I will discuss it with András Tímár (our lead)... That's all...


Please take no offense in this.

Oh, I am not :o) We just talking about - in my opinion - something cool :o)
But it's really a question I would like to ask. By stressing on the 
"Premium" rather than on OpenOffice.org itself,
I don't want to hurt the image of OpenOffice.org via OpenOffice.org 
Premium. Instead of this we prefer OpenOffice.org and we provide 
additional link to download OpenOffice.org Premium... The all 
hu.openoffice.org is about Openoffice.org not from Premium... Evry 
communication tals about OpenOffice.org not from Premium... So we (or I) 
do not harm OOo downloads moreover we can collect more user for 
OpenOffice.org with Premium...
you may end up harming the actual software's image more than anything 
else. It's of course a discussion you should have inside the 
Hungarian-speaking OOo community. And by the way, how does all this 
fit in the overall community works of the HU community?
Contributors have created Slackware, UHU (Hungarian Linux variant), 
Gentoo packages for Premium, the users like the idea of bundled 
extras... The our community members were sceptic about success but the 
voice of people was quite demonstarative. It is high time to did same 
with you :o) What more can we do? Yes, we can create more language 
versions (en-US and de for 2.0.3) with the help of OOo community and try 
to push it into the main branch (with the help of OOo community)

How do you sort out the licensing issues?
I try to take over the licence issues. I am not sure it is a real 
problem concernind OpenOffice.org. I have agreement from aouthors to use 
it Openoffice.org freely...


I certainly appreciate your dissemination work, but maybe a better 
mutual understanding should be necessary here.

Right :o)


Best Regards,
Charles-H. Schulz,
Lead of the Native-Language Confederation,
OpenOffice.org .

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Thanks,
KAMI

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fw: Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[KAMI]

Scottish cultural center írta:
 


HI

If you want so we can mirror your site on ours, scottishcultiralcenter.com ,
we already do it for open office

Just contact us

Sean 
  

Dear Sean!

I would like to thank your offer! You can mirror the files from 
ftp://ftp.fsf.hu/OpenOffice.org_hu/devel/OOB680_m5_Premium/


Thank you very much,
KAMI

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] contributing

[neeeel]

hi I am looking for a project to contribute in as a programmer, any help on 
how to get started, or what to do would be appreciated

thanks
neil

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[Charles-H. Schulz]

Hello all,

(cutting the previous thread for the sake of clarity).
I wish to appease this debate but weigh in it as well. While it's true 
that OpenOffice.org "Premium" is a rather unfortunate name in a 
marketing sense (it really sounds like something you actually pay), and 
while I certainly see the advantages of bundling OOo with extra fonts 
and templates, I wonder what you do concerning the promotion of the 
actual OpenOffice.org software in Hungary.


Please take no offense in this. But it's really a question I would like 
to ask. By stressing on the "Premium" rather than on OpenOffice.org 
itself, you may end up harming the actual software's image more than 
anything else. It's of course a discussion you should have inside the 
Hungarian-speaking OOo community. And by the way, how does all this fit 
in the overall community works of the HU community? How do you sort out 
the licensing issues?


I certainly appreciate your dissemination work, but maybe a better 
mutual understanding should be necessary here.


Best Regards,
Charles-H. Schulz,
Lead of the Native-Language Confederation,
OpenOffice.org .

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Calc improvement

[Eike Rathke]

Hi Moisés,

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:39:41 +0200, Moisés Márquez Gil wrote:

> Yes, this is the problem. But, why it can't be done ?

Well, copying a multi-selection to the clipboard isn't the problem.
Pasting the content is, as there is no definition how it should be
handled if, for example, the destination area selected is smaller or
larger than the original encompassing area, is a multi-selection itself,
or if the destination document is not a spreadsheet document at all.
Just to name a few.

  Eike

-- 
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 GnuPG key 0x293C05FD:  997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[Szalai Kálmán]

Pavel Janík írta:

   From: KAMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:48:52 +0200

   > The license issues under eliminating :o) The templates that seem
   > problematic is undel LGPL or PDL... I will check files from
   > OpenOffice.org EXTRAS CD (that downloadable from Openoffice.org) but
   > they use ooextras, openoffice.org stuffs so the are free. Fonts are
   > free, Clip arts are free, Cisco clip arts free but aganist for
   > alteration.
  

Hello!

Hmmm. You seem to not distinguish between free and free.
If we want to license something really free we should do it under BSD 
license :o) Of course the LGPL (or like) licenses serve best the 
community. In the point of users I thing the main percent of users won't 
change, alter the resources (cliparts and fonts)... Of course some of 
them migh want to change something, but they can connect the original 
author for permission. In the other hand alteration is something to do 
on existing thing. You might copy it in new name  the you can change it. 
In the case of Cisco cliparts - I agreed with Cisco - they have a well 
know and widely used sign set. If I were Cisco I doesn't want to someone 
to change my sets - create a new - incompatible figure... Do you? You 
can use it to create a new one on different name...

 I personally do
not care about things that are free (as in free beer) and their license
prohibits me to change them. Such work is useless for me and also for OOo.
  
Why do you want to change cliparts? Fonts? Why don't you create a new 
one? Or a derivate? Also you can always ask the author to help out 
you... I understand that the world should be free but it isn't.. We  
should admit the others they think different.

I do not like many things on your XXX Premium.

Wow... Can you explain it? I would like to suit to your directives.

 I even consider it as unfair
to name something as SomethingElse Premium (which in fact is my primary
reason I won't look at it at all).
  
The name was my decision. Sorry. I wanted a name that says it contains 
more than vanilla OpenOffice.org. I selected a way like other software: 
nero premium, ms office professional, windows xp professional and 
others. The base of this product is same as OpenOffice.org. I just added 
some extras. The Hungarian team builded it on same machines as original 
OpenOffice.org. Of course I am open to your ideas about the name of 
product. And the user response is excellent. There are many user that 
only installs the next version of OpenOffice.org after Premium released 
(for the reason of internal testing it appear 5-10 days later than the 
original)... Of course the installs OpenOffice.org Premium... We 
relaised more than 2 downloads on different sites for 2.0.2, and I 
didn't counted the main donwload site numbers (it hasn't got stats for 
downloads) at fsf.hu... The OpenOffice.org Premium has been released on 
three IT mags' DVD encloses... So in my opinion it is that what the 
users want. Of course the most important is OpenOffice.org, but the 
users like the additional content. If you compare the main office 
suites, the default installation CD contains lots of extras... Moreover 
Microsoft offers more extras on its site.

For very similar example, have a look at

http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63805

This issue is about including some kind of fonts into OOo. It is
impossible, because these fonts are non-free. But what we could include is
a generic framework for new font sets inclusion. And we can even include
some free (and license compatible!) fontsets into our (I'm working on
OpenOffice.org) product.
  
I don't want to include something if it is not good to us. But I am 
waiting for the help to community to enhance the Openoffice.org user 
experience :o) I would include the useful things... (If you look DejaVu 
fonts and Fontwork gallery already included)... I want a same 
progression with other parts of Premium package...

This is what I expect from your work on your OOo distribution. Are you
going this way or you simply bundle everything you have/downloaded from all
around the world into it?
I would like to include useful things. I only included that seem to me 
useful. Of course the current situation is a little bit changed. I would 
like to make it to available in more languages... enus, de on the way, 
but I do not know what is useful for that languages. So mere help need 
:o) Of course I can do CZ version if you want :o) But please understand 
- I my term - the office application is far more than the just the 
applications. We can vote the users...

 Such project is useless in my opinion. Providing
framework to include all these extras file into the running product and/or
into the instset is worth the effort. Simple/manual bundling of everything
into it is not.
  
The framework is ready. You can review the diff files of OpenOffice.org. 
All of Premium's modification is providing a perfect (or near) and 
seamless integration into ori

Fw: Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[Lina Kemmel]

Return Receipt
   
   Your   Fw: Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium   
   document:   
   
   wasLina Kemmel/Israel/IBM   
   received
   by: 
   
   at:16/05/2006 16:06:20  
   




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[Scottish cultural center]

 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Scottish cultural center
Date: 16/05/2006 14:52:52
To: dev@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium
 
HI
If you want so we can mirror your site on ours, scottishcultiralcenter.com ,
we already do it for open office
Just contact us
Sean 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: KAMI
Date: 16/05/2006 10:49:36
To: dev@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium
 
Pavel Janík írta:
>From: KAMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:23:59 +0200
>
> Hi,
>
>> Are there any way to mirror our Premium builds on OpenOffice.org
site?
>> Or can someone mirror it to other sites?
>
> have you already cleared the license issues? IIRC several people notified
> you that it contains non-free stuff and as such ...
>
Hello Pavel!
The license issues under eliminating :o) The templates that seem
problematic is undel LGPL or PDL... I will check files from
OpenOffice.org EXTRAS CD (that downloadable from Openoffice.org) but
they use ooextras, openoffice.org stuffs so the are free. Fonts are
free, Clip arts are free, Cisco clip arts free but aganist for
alteration. Samples and Documents (tutorials) are free. Please check the
attached mails. Could you share with us your opinion?
 
Thnaks,
KAMI
 
-
-
Wanadoo vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
 
 
 
 

Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[Pavel Janík]

   From: KAMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:48:52 +0200

   > The license issues under eliminating :o) The templates that seem
   > problematic is undel LGPL or PDL... I will check files from
   > OpenOffice.org EXTRAS CD (that downloadable from Openoffice.org) but
   > they use ooextras, openoffice.org stuffs so the are free. Fonts are
   > free, Clip arts are free, Cisco clip arts free but aganist for
   > alteration.

Hmmm. You seem to not distinguish between free and free. I personally do
not care about things that are free (as in free beer) and their license
prohibits me to change them. Such work is useless for me and also for OOo.

I do not like many things on your XXX Premium. I even consider it as unfair
to name something as SomethingElse Premium (which in fact is my primary
reason I won't look at it at all).

For very similar example, have a look at

http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63805

This issue is about including some kind of fonts into OOo. It is
impossible, because these fonts are non-free. But what we could include is
a generic framework for new font sets inclusion. And we can even include
some free (and license compatible!) fontsets into our (I'm working on
OpenOffice.org) product.

This is what I expect from your work on your OOo distribution. Are you
going this way or you simply bundle everything you have/downloaded from all
around the world into it? Such project is useless in my opinion. Providing
framework to include all these extras file into the running product and/or
into the instset is worth the effort. Simple/manual bundling of everything
into it is not.
-- 
Pavel Janík

This doesn't mean you should mix false(1) and true(1) editors.
  -- Ole Aamot in alt.religion.emacs

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] UNO Training Course ?

[Jürgen Schmidt]

Hi Werner,


Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:

Hi Werner,

Werner Schulte a écrit :


Can anyone recommend an UNO Training course (preferred in germany in
german) ?
Focus should be the C++ interface.


Here are some links in english:
http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/cedric_bosdonnat/2005_12_07_creating-an-ure
http://udk.openoffice.org/cpp/man/tutorial/unointro.html


i am not aware of any good course about UNO and especially the C++ 
binding. Cedric gave you some hints and you should also take a look into 
the SDK and there especailly the C++ examples and you should take a look 
into the Developer's Guide. You can find a chapter about UNO and the C++ 
binding. All other examples in Java can be easy converted to C++.


Juergen




Hope this helps you,
Cedric

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Calc improvement

[Moisés Márquez Gil]

Yes, this is the problem. But, why it can't be done ?

Thanx

I'm not sure I understood your problem, but if it is about copying
selected multiple non-contiguous cells to the clipboard, it can't be
done.

  Eike
  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Mirroring OpenOffice.org Premium

[KAMI]

Pavel Janík írta:

   From: KAMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:23:59 +0200

Hi,

   > Are there any way to mirror our Premium builds on OpenOffice.org site?
   > Or can someone mirror it to other sites?

have you already cleared the license issues? IIRC several people notified
you that it contains non-free stuff and as such ...
  

Hello Pavel!
The license issues under eliminating :o) The templates that seem 
problematic is undel LGPL or PDL... I will check files from 
OpenOffice.org EXTRAS CD (that downloadable from Openoffice.org) but 
they use ooextras, openoffice.org stuffs so the are free. Fonts are 
free, Clip arts are free, Cisco clip arts free but aganist for 
alteration. Samples and Documents (tutorials) are free. Please check the 
attached mails. Could you share with us your opinion?


Thnaks,
KAMI
--- Begin Message ---
On Friday 28 April 2006 21:59, KamiHír wrote:
> Petr Mladek írta:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2006 18:43, KamiHír wrote:
> >> As you probably know there is an enhanced version of OpenOffice.org
> >> called OpenOffice.org Premium.
> >> You can download from here:
> >> ftp://ftp.fsf.hu/OpenOffice.org_hu/devel/OOB680_m5_Premium/
> >> http://ftp.fsf.hu/OpenOffice.org_hu/devel/OOB680_m5_Premium/
> >> (for Linux and Windows in English and Hungarian)
> >> 
> >> Can someone organize English templates to me? I am uploading the zip
> >> file (with templates and empty folders) here:
> >> w3.enternet.hu/szalaik/download/TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip
>
> Dear Petr!
>
> Nice to hear you! So I did not steal anything, I just downloaded the
> collection of:

I did not say that you had stolen the things. I just said that we must not 
distribute it if we are not sure about the license.

> http://www.prooo-box.org/
> http://ooextras.sourceforge.net/
> and
> http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/ind
>ex.html
> ftp://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/iso/en/ooo_201
>_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso 

(Michael, there is a summary for you at the end ;-)

I looked at these sites and it looks like:

TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip:/en-US/source/simpress seems to be taken from 
http://ooextras.sourceforge.net/ and are covered under LGPL


TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip:/en-US/source/english are taken from 
prooo-box_2.0.2-1.iso:templates/english. The license is inside each template.
In fact, they seem to be taken from http://ooextras.sourceforge.net/. They are 
under LGPL.


TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip:/en-US/source/misc are takes from 
prooo-box_2.0.2-1.iso:templates/misc. There is the README file that says that 
they are taken from http://ooextras.sourceforge.net/ and are under LGPL.


Some of the templates directly below TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip:/en-US/source/ are 
taken from 
http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/index.html.
 
Maybe, all of them? I has not found the license as well. I am afraid that it 
is not defined. We would need to ask Scott Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I  
could do it if you want.


TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip:/en-US/source/Template are taken from 
ftp://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/iso/en/ooo_201_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso

Hmm, there are some license files in 
ooo_201_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso:/licenses/. Though, there is not said 
that the license files apply for all files. And they do not apply beause 
there are sources with a different license, for example:
ooo_201_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso:/dictionaries/lt_LT.zip (BSD)
ooo_201_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso:/Clip Art (Public Domain)


Note that if you open for example 
TEMPLATES1-en-US.zip:/en-US/source/Templates/Biz_Financial/Balance Sheet.ots
or alternatively
ooo_201_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso:/Templates/Biz_Financial/Balance 
Sheet.ots

You can see:

--- cut ---
© 2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc. for its contributors. All rights reserved.
© 2000 Embellix for its contributors. All rights reserved.

For more Embellix Temapltes that works with StarOffice, visit 
www.templatezone.com/staroffice
Visit the Staroffice web site at www.sun.com/products/staroffice
--- cut ---

Well, this template would be free these days. Though, we need to found/get a 
written permissions.



Summary:

1. We can use the templates from http://ooextras.sourceforge.net/ because they 
are under LGPL.
2. We could ignore templates from http://www.prooo-box.org/ because there is 
nothing new in compare with ooextras.
3. I could ask Scott Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about the license for 
http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates
4. I wonder who is responsible for 
ftp://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/iso/en/ooo_201_allplatforms_20051222_extras.iso
and who could help us to discover the license. Michael, do you have any idea?



-- 
Best Regards,

Petr Mladek
software developer
-  
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Drahob