Re: [Potlatch-dev] Git starter?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: If there's any gotchas let me know. Ok, since you asked: First you need to get a copy of the potlatch2 repository from somewhere. It doesn't really matter where it comes from... ... There's many different ways to share your changes with the rest of the world... These are not good words to reassure the newcomer that these instructions are simple will take him where he wants to go :) The github.com account is optional. When it comes to publishing your changes then yes, you do need to put them somewhere public, whether that be on github[1], another server, your own server, or where ever suits. When you have something published then just let one of us know where (e.g. by emailing the list) and we can start reviewing and incorporating your code. I find this bit of using git somewhat deflating. With SVN, I was able to commit my changes into the repository. Although the changes weren't immediately in the production release (fortunately), other developers would immediately see them next time they did an update. Perhaps it's irrational, but committing to the repository is a lot more satisfying than publishing to my own private repository and hoping that someone comes along and takes a look. Before: svn commit After: git commit Email list Andy, Richard, or someone (who are the code reviewers, anyway?) reviews changes, optionally accepts. If you need a hand with any of this just give me a shout, I'm more than happy to help. I guess I'll have to try the github fork/clone thing again and see what goes wrong again. Steve ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] Git starter?
On 31/08/11 10:46, Steve Bennett wrote: I find this bit of using git somewhat deflating. With SVN, I was able to commit my changes into the repository. Although the changes weren't immediately in the production release (fortunately), other developers would immediately see them next time they did an update. Perhaps it's irrational, but committing to the repository is a lot more satisfying than publishing to my own private repository and hoping that someone comes along and takes a look. Before: svn commit After: git commit Email list Andy, Richard, or someone (who are the code reviewers, anyway?) reviews changes, optionally accepts. So basically you're complaining that your edits now have to be reviewed before they are merged and you can't ram them down people's throats anymore? There's no need to hope that somebody comes along and takes a look though - that's why you send pull requests, whether on github or by email. That's you saying hey, I've got something good here I'd like you to consider for Potlatch and then your change can be considered for inclusion. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] Git starter?
On 31/08/2011 10:46, Steve Bennett wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Andy Allangravityst...@gmail.com wrote: If there's any gotchas let me know. Ok, since you asked: First you need to get a copy of the potlatch2 repository from somewhere. It doesn't really matter where it comes from... ... There's many different ways to share your changes with the rest of the world... These are not good words to reassure the newcomer that these instructions are simple will take him where he wants to go :) In case anyone hasn't seen it there's also Ed Loach's Getting a development copy of Potlatch 2 onto Windows 7 (64-bit) list on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:EdLoach . There are probably others around. Cheers, Andy ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
[Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #3989: Wrong data entered for agricultural field
#3989: Wrong data entered for agricultural field -+-- Reporter: HillWithSmallFields | Owner: potlatch-dev@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: potlatch2| Version: 2.0 Keywords: | -+-- If you select agricultural -- field in the simple type selector, what actually goes into the data is landuse=meadow instead of landuse=field. -- Ticket URL: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3989 OpenStreetMap http://www.openstreetmap.org/ OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the whole world ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] Git starter?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but this was causing lots of issues, as I'm sure you remember. Actually not - apart from my commiting changes in insufficient granularity. Happy to take your word for it, though. A few other things spring instantly to mind - an ill-advised redesign of the Undo system, a few problems with the Magic Roundabout system (e.g. having a 50% chance of nuking a way when trying to shorten it) and, more than anything else, lots of cases of commits generating compiler warnings. That these commits were to trunk kept necessitating other developers stepping up and fixing the build before they could continue with their own work. That was getting quite disruptive. You're probably aware of the long-running debates about pre-commit review versus post-commit review. Quick summary: pre-commit review reduces developer activity level but improves quality. I don't know much about the different approaches from a theoretical viewpoint, except that the way were were doing it before caused us lots of issues, and was making refactoring nigh on impossible. As Richard has said, his master branch is the canonical 'this is Potlatch2', so he's in charge Cool. This is the definitive statement lacking from the wiki page, which confused me. I'd written that before the situation was clear. But there's also the distinction that it's not necessarily what OSMF is deploying, and I try to discourage anyone from getting worried about which repo to clone from. If you clone from mine, and then want to pull changes from someone else, it all comes out the same. Any notion of One True Repo just causes more confusion later on! 1) There is still a definitive repository Make sure you realise that there's nothing that makes it the definitive repository other than social factors. Unlike svn there's no central repository. It's only definitive in that Richard is the current maintainer, and the only difference he has over the rest of us is that TomH generally doesn't disagree with him (on p2 matters at least!). But you could also view the OSMF repo as definitive if you care about the version that's actually deployed on osm.org There are circumstances (we've done it two or three times already that I can recall) where TomH pulls in bugfixes from my repo straight into the OSMF one and deploys that, when RichardF wasn't around to update his own repository. That's fine, git is totally decentralised like that so it works. Cheers, Andy ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Osm2pgsql and failed planet import
On 08/30/2011 11:50 AM, John Smith wrote: osm2pgsql doesn't have any code to check for memory allocation failures and to deal with it in a sane way, it just assumes all allocations are fine until it checks the nodes when going over pending ways etc. Anthony posted a patch a couple of months back, I didn't hear if the patch was added to the svn version(s). i'm not aware of any other patch, but i changed the cache allocation code quite recently to allocate the full configured cache size up front instead of doing so in blocks of 8KB. The main reason for this was that although all cache blocks get freed once the cache is no longer needed all this memory is very unlikely to get returned to the OS due to heap fragmentation. Allocating everything up front has the advantage that malloc() will use mmap() to map the cache memory into the process memory space instead of putting it on the heap, and so it can later be free()d without being affected by potential heap fragmentation. As a side effect this also allows to check up front that there is sufficient memory for the configured cache size instead of running into out-of-memory situations only after the import had already been going for potentially quite a while. As the memory is really freed before the index building step now it is possible to configure larger work_mem and maintenance_work_mem buffers on the postgresql side without having to wait for the unused-but-still-allocated osm2pgsql process memory gradually being pushed out to swap over time. Current code can be found here: https://github.com/hholzgra/osm2pgsql/tree/freeable_cache -- hartmut ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] OSM Data to Distance Matrix
Good day, I am working on a project related to arc routing as a part of my undergraduate special problem. I wish to parse / convert the osm data file to a distance matrix. Are there existing libraries for converting osm data to distance matrix (or something close)? Thank you for reading the mail. Have a nice day. -- *James Carlo Plaras* BS Computer Science University of the Philippines - Los Baños ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] java osm renderer
2011/8/31 BG mrharmo...@gmx.de: Hej. I want to try to make a renderer with java. But i do not know how i get the geometry information and interpret it. I think it would be easy to make sql requests about the objects to get. But the geometry column (which comes with postgis) confuses me, this is a bunch of numbers. They are in a binary format, you can transform them to Text with ST_AsText http://www.postgis.org/docs/ST_AsText.html cheers, Martin ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] java osm renderer
BG mrharmo...@gmx.de wrote: But the geometry column (which comes with postgis) confuses me, this is a bunch of numbers. It's a OGC standard Format called Well Known Binary (WKB) Postgis provides a funktion (astext) which will transform it to WKT (Well known text). http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards Regards Sven -- Ich fürchte mich nicht vor der Rückkehr der Faschisten in der Maske der Faschisten, sondern vor der Rückkehr der Faschisten in der Maske der Demokraten (Theodor W. Adorno) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
