Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #776

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


--
[...truncated 2.06 MB...]
[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #775

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


--
[...truncated 2.04 MB...]
[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

Release Step 007 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

1. Run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_007 -Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will download the artifacts then unzip and compile the source artifact.
2. Validate that the compiled artifacts match the downloaded artifacts.
3. If they do, then run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_007_Sign 
-Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will PGP sign the source ZIP and compiled JARs
4. Then run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_007_Upload 
-Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will upload the signed artifacts to Maven Release Staging.  Do not "Close" 
the staging repository until the other repos have been added.

Release Step 006 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_006 and run the following commands:
git push
git push origin org.apache.royale.typedefs-0.9.6-rc1

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 005a Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_005a and run the following commands:
git push

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 005 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_005 and run the following commands:
git push

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 004 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_004 and run the following commands:
git push
git checkout release/0.9.6
git push -u origin release/0.9.6

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 003 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

1. If you are releasing the utils jars (compiler-jburg-types and 
compiler-build-tools), Run:
  ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003 -Dutils=true -Drelease.version=0.9.6
Otherwise, Run:
 ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003 -Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will download the artifacts then unzip and compile the source artifact.
2. Validate that the compiled artifacts match the downloaded artifacts.
3. If they do, then run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003_Sign 
-Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will PGP sign the source ZIP and compiled JARs
4. Then run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003_Upload 
-Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will upload the signed artifacts to Maven Release Staging.  Do not "Close" 
the staging repository until the other repos have been added.

Release Step 002a Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Continue on to Release Step 003

Release Step 002 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_002 and run the following commands:
git push
git push origin org.apache.royale.compiler-0.9.6-rc1

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 001a Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_001a_If_Utils and run the following 
commands:
git push

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 001 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_001 and run the following commands:
git push
git checkout release/0.9.6
git push -u origin release/0.9.6

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Andrew Wetmore]

It is now here: [1]. I will update the Apache Flex site, which mentions
Royale, to point to it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Royale

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:56 PM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> Following the GEMO "good enough, move on" principle, I am going to try to
> move the page to "live" status. We can continue refining it and adding
> information indefinitely.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:21 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
>
>> @Carlos if the client does not want to give access to a pre-production
>> site, would they agree to our posting a webtour, a video of the site in
>> action?
>>
>> Thank you for the thoughts about what to say about Royale. I will include
>> multi-target thoughts!.
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:45 PM Carlos Rovira 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we asking our client about what we can share about our first production
>>> royale app.
>>> Let's see if we can post the link to a pre-production site, if we can
>>> post user/pass to enter it, and if we can't do that at least post some
>>> screen shots
>>>
>>> @Andrew Wetmore  thanks for working on the
>>> wikipedia page, that looks like a good starting point! :)
>>> just few ideas: talk about Royale not just as technology that can target
>>> HTML, but like a multi target one capable of be extended in the future to
>>> target next ones like WebAssembly, or other native ones.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 14:29, Andrew Wetmore ()
>>> escribió:
>>>
 Here is the current state of our Wikipedia page in my editor area [1]. I
 have a few things to add, like figuring out how to make the logo appear
 in
 the info box and adding more interesting stuff to the "salient features"
 section. I also want to add a section about the community and how to
 become
 a participant.

 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Inukjuak/Apache_Royale

 On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Harbs  wrote:

 > That sucks… :-(
 >
 > One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally
 on a
 > text editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text
 editor does
 > automatic saves).
 >
 > > On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
 wrote:
 > >
 > > @Harbs: thank you!
 > >
 > > Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating
 it in
 > > the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple
 of
 > > hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox
 does
 > not
 > > seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
 > > things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it
 should be
 > > ready to go live sometime this weekend.
 > >
 > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs >>> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 > >
 > >> Here’s one:
 > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
 > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php> <
 > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
 > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php>>
 > >>
 > >>> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore 
 > wrote:
 > >>>
 > >>> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale.
 Do we
 > >> have
 > >>> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
 > >> internal
 > >>> company apps?
 > >>>
 > >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira <
 carlosrov...@apache.org
 > >
 > >>> wrote:
 > >>>
 >  Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
 > 
 >  El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore (<
 > cottag...@gmail.com
 > >>> )
 >  escribió:
 > 
 > > I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active
 enough to
 >  avoid
 > > close scrutiny of what I write.
 > >
 > > The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
 >  particular
 > > characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
 >  published,
 > > we can work on improving it.
 > >
 > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
 > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
 > > wrote:
 > >
 > >> Hi Andrew,
 > >>
 > >> what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for
 Apache
 >  Royale?
 > >> Then we can link from the website.
 > >>
 > >> I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your
 > writing
 >  and
 > >> editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
 > >>
 > >> Let us know what you think! :)
 > >>
 > >> Thank you
 > >>
 > >>
 > >>
 > >> --
 > >> Carlos Rovira
 > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
 > >>
 > >>

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Andrew Wetmore]

Following the GEMO "good enough, move on" principle, I am going to try to
move the page to "live" status. We can continue refining it and adding
information indefinitely.

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:21 PM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> @Carlos if the client does not want to give access to a pre-production
> site, would they agree to our posting a webtour, a video of the site in
> action?
>
> Thank you for the thoughts about what to say about Royale. I will include
> multi-target thoughts!.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:45 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we asking our client about what we can share about our first production
>> royale app.
>> Let's see if we can post the link to a pre-production site, if we can
>> post user/pass to enter it, and if we can't do that at least post some
>> screen shots
>>
>> @Andrew Wetmore  thanks for working on the
>> wikipedia page, that looks like a good starting point! :)
>> just few ideas: talk about Royale not just as technology that can target
>> HTML, but like a multi target one capable of be extended in the future to
>> target next ones like WebAssembly, or other native ones.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>> El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 14:29, Andrew Wetmore ()
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Here is the current state of our Wikipedia page in my editor area [1]. I
>>> have a few things to add, like figuring out how to make the logo appear
>>> in
>>> the info box and adding more interesting stuff to the "salient features"
>>> section. I also want to add a section about the community and how to
>>> become
>>> a participant.
>>>
>>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Inukjuak/Apache_Royale
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Harbs  wrote:
>>>
>>> > That sucks… :-(
>>> >
>>> > One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally on
>>> a
>>> > text editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text editor
>>> does
>>> > automatic saves).
>>> >
>>> > > On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > @Harbs: thank you!
>>> > >
>>> > > Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating
>>> it in
>>> > > the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple
>>> of
>>> > > hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox
>>> does
>>> > not
>>> > > seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
>>> > > things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it
>>> should be
>>> > > ready to go live sometime this weekend.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs >> >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Here’s one:
>>> > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
>>> > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php> <
>>> > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
>>> > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do
>>> we
>>> > >> have
>>> > >>> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
>>> > >> internal
>>> > >>> company apps?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira <
>>> carlosrov...@apache.org
>>> > >
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> >  Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
>>> > 
>>> >  El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore (<
>>> > cottag...@gmail.com
>>> > >>> )
>>> >  escribió:
>>> > 
>>> > > I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active
>>> enough to
>>> >  avoid
>>> > > close scrutiny of what I write.
>>> > >
>>> > > The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
>>> >  particular
>>> > > characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
>>> >  published,
>>> > > we can work on improving it.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
>>> > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi Andrew,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
>>> >  Royale?
>>> > >> Then we can link from the website.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your
>>> > writing
>>> >  and
>>> > >> editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Let us know what you think! :)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thank you
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Carlos Rovira
>>> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Andrew Wetmore
>>> > >
>>> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>>> > >
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >  --
>>> >  Carlos Rovira
>>> >  http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > 
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> --
>>> > >>> Andrew Wetmore
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>>> > >>
>>> > 

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Andrew Wetmore]

@Carlos if the client does not want to give access to a pre-production
site, would they agree to our posting a webtour, a video of the site in
action?

Thank you for the thoughts about what to say about Royale. I will include
multi-target thoughts!.

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:45 PM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we asking our client about what we can share about our first production
> royale app.
> Let's see if we can post the link to a pre-production site, if we can post
> user/pass to enter it, and if we can't do that at least post some screen
> shots
>
> @Andrew Wetmore  thanks for working on the wikipedia
> page, that looks like a good starting point! :)
> just few ideas: talk about Royale not just as technology that can target
> HTML, but like a multi target one capable of be extended in the future to
> target next ones like WebAssembly, or other native ones.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 14:29, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
>> Here is the current state of our Wikipedia page in my editor area [1]. I
>> have a few things to add, like figuring out how to make the logo appear in
>> the info box and adding more interesting stuff to the "salient features"
>> section. I also want to add a section about the community and how to
>> become
>> a participant.
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Inukjuak/Apache_Royale
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Harbs  wrote:
>>
>> > That sucks… :-(
>> >
>> > One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally on a
>> > text editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text editor
>> does
>> > automatic saves).
>> >
>> > > On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > @Harbs: thank you!
>> > >
>> > > Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating
>> it in
>> > > the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple of
>> > > hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox
>> does
>> > not
>> > > seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
>> > > things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it should
>> be
>> > > ready to go live sometime this weekend.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs > > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Here’s one:
>> > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
>> > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php> <
>> > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
>> > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php>>
>> > >>
>> > >>> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore 
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do
>> we
>> > >> have
>> > >>> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
>> > >> internal
>> > >>> company apps?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org
>> > >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> >  Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
>> > 
>> >  El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore (<
>> > cottag...@gmail.com
>> > >>> )
>> >  escribió:
>> > 
>> > > I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active
>> enough to
>> >  avoid
>> > > close scrutiny of what I write.
>> > >
>> > > The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
>> >  particular
>> > > characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
>> >  published,
>> > > we can work on improving it.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
>> > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Andrew,
>> > >>
>> > >> what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
>> >  Royale?
>> > >> Then we can link from the website.
>> > >>
>> > >> I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your
>> > writing
>> >  and
>> > >> editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
>> > >>
>> > >> Let us know what you think! :)
>> > >>
>> > >> Thank you
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Carlos Rovira
>> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > >
>> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>> > >
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  --
>> >  Carlos Rovira
>> >  http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> > 
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Andrew Wetmore
>> > >>>
>> > >>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > >
>> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ 
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Wetmore
>>
>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

we asking our client about what we can share about our first production
royale app.
Let's see if we can post the link to a pre-production site, if we can post
user/pass to enter it, and if we can't do that at least post some screen
shots

@Andrew Wetmore  thanks for working on the wikipedia
page, that looks like a good starting point! :)
just few ideas: talk about Royale not just as technology that can target
HTML, but like a multi target one capable of be extended in the future to
target next ones like WebAssembly, or other native ones.

Thanks!

Carlos



El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 14:29, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> Here is the current state of our Wikipedia page in my editor area [1]. I
> have a few things to add, like figuring out how to make the logo appear in
> the info box and adding more interesting stuff to the "salient features"
> section. I also want to add a section about the community and how to become
> a participant.
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Inukjuak/Apache_Royale
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Harbs  wrote:
>
> > That sucks… :-(
> >
> > One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally on a
> > text editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text editor
> does
> > automatic saves).
> >
> > > On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > @Harbs: thank you!
> > >
> > > Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating it
> in
> > > the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple of
> > > hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox does
> > not
> > > seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
> > > things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it should
> be
> > > ready to go live sometime this weekend.
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs  > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Here’s one:
> > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
> > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php> <
> > >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
> > https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php>>
> > >>
> > >>> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore 
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do we
> > >> have
> > >>> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
> > >> internal
> > >>> company apps?
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
> > 
> >  El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > cottag...@gmail.com
> > >>> )
> >  escribió:
> > 
> > > I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active enough
> to
> >  avoid
> > > close scrutiny of what I write.
> > >
> > > The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
> >  particular
> > > characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
> >  published,
> > > we can work on improving it.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
> > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Andrew,
> > >>
> > >> what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
> >  Royale?
> > >> Then we can link from the website.
> > >>
> > >> I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your
> > writing
> >  and
> > >> editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
> > >>
> > >> Let us know what you think! :)
> > >>
> > >> Thank you
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Carlos Rovira
> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  Carlos Rovira
> >  http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Andrew Wetmore
> > >>>
> > >>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ 
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #774

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


--
[...truncated 2.04 MB...]
[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

[mxmlc] using source file: 

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Andrew Wetmore]

@Piotr: yes, that is correct. If I use the menu, it is like I am using the
table of contents of a physical book. If I follow a link within the text,
it is as if I am picking up a different physical book.

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:18 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> By saying that:
>
> "If I am starting from the help
> docs I do not want the window to suddenly be focusing on something else; I
> would prefer a new window to appear with whatever I clicked on so I can go
> back to the first window easily and continue my studies."
>
> Do you mean when you are being in doc [1] - above apply on anything what
> you click inside text - Am I right ? Above new window rule do not apply
> when you navigating trough menu on the right sight in doc [1]?
>
> [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 17 maj 2019 o 12:12 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):
>
> > I agree with @Piotr that context is key. If I am starting from the help
> > docs I do not want the window to suddenly be focusing on something else;
> I
> > would prefer a new window to appear with whatever I clicked on so I can
> go
> > back to the first window easily and continue my studies. Similarly, if my
> > context is the website, then I am thinking about the get-started stuff as
> > part of the website, and I am happy for the material I click on to take
> > over the current screen.
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:23 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Let's see whether Andrew have different thoughts. He is an expert in
> case
> > > of documentation ;) Adrian is working on 1 or 2 small pull requests
> more.
> > > ;)
> > >
> > > pt., 17 maj 2019 o 10:11 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Ok Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > so I think we have all set as you said, and we just need to worry
> about
> > > the
> > > > content created to follow that guidelines
> > > >
> > > > :)
> > > >
> > > > El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 10:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > In my opinion it depends where you are clicking on Get Started. If
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > clicking on Get Started on main page (main menu or footer) you
> should
> > > > stay
> > > > > in the same window. I think it should be true for whatever option
> in
> > > main
> > > > > menu you are clicking.
> > > > >
> > > > > However if you are in Docs already and click on "Apache Royale
> > > > > Documentation
> > > > > " - it would can go to
> > separate
> > > > > window where you can easy navigate.
> > > > >
> > > > > My 2 cents ;)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > pt., 17 maj 2019 o 09:59 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in
> > its
> > > > own
> > > > > > window. That's ok for me too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is
> > in
> > > > > > website, but goes to royale docs
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > > > cottag...@gmail.com
> > > > > >)
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside
> > of
> > > > > Royale
> > > > > > > docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it
> to
> > > > open
> > > > > > in a
> > > > > > > new window rather than taking over the window I am using to
> read
> > > the
> > > > > > docs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira <
> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Adrian,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you
> > think
> > > > it
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > point to other page.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them
> that
> > > > > refers
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > > > > > > > We talked about this when launched the website: In the
> website
> > we
> > > > put
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to
> > the
> > > > site
> > > > > > > load
> > > > > > > > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for
> Royale-docs.
> > > We
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the
> > same
> > > > > page.
> > > > > > > For
> > > > > > > > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page
> > while
> > > > > > mailing
> > > > > > > > list info will load in the current one.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > > 

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Andrew Wetmore]

Here is the current state of our Wikipedia page in my editor area [1]. I
have a few things to add, like figuring out how to make the logo appear in
the info box and adding more interesting stuff to the "salient features"
section. I also want to add a section about the community and how to become
a participant.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Inukjuak/Apache_Royale

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Harbs  wrote:

> That sucks… :-(
>
> One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally on a
> text editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text editor does
> automatic saves).
>
> > On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> >
> > @Harbs: thank you!
> >
> > Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating it in
> > the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple of
> > hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox does
> not
> > seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
> > things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it should be
> > ready to go live sometime this weekend.
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs  harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> Here’s one:
> >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php> <
> >> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php>>
> >>
> >>> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do we
> >> have
> >>> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
> >> internal
> >>> company apps?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
> 
>  El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore (<
> cottag...@gmail.com
> >>> )
>  escribió:
> 
> > I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active enough to
>  avoid
> > close scrutiny of what I write.
> >
> > The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
>  particular
> > characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
>  published,
> > we can work on improving it.
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
> >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
>  Royale?
> >> Then we can link from the website.
> >>
> >> I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your
> writing
>  and
> >> editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
> >>
> >> Let us know what you think! :)
> >>
> >> Thank you
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
> 
> 
>  --
>  Carlos Rovira
>  http://about.me/carlosrovira
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>>
> >>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ 
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Harbs]

That sucks… :-(

One thing I like about git based wikis is that you can edit locally on a text 
editor and these things don’t happen (as long as your text editor does 
automatic saves).

> On May 17, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> 
> @Harbs: thank you!
> 
> Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating it in
> the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple of
> hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox does not
> seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
> things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it should be
> ready to go live sometime this weekend.
> 
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs  > wrote:
> 
>> Here’s one:
>> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php 
>>  <
>> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php 
>> >
>> 
>>> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do we
>> have
>>> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
>> internal
>>> company apps?
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
 
 El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore (>> )
 escribió:
 
> I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active enough to
 avoid
> close scrutiny of what I write.
> 
> The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
 particular
> characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
 published,
> we can work on improving it.
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andrew,
>> 
>> what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
 Royale?
>> Then we can link from the website.
>> 
>> I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your writing
 and
>> editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
>> 
>> Let us know what you think! :)
>> 
>> Thank you
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
> 
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> 
 
 
 --
 Carlos Rovira
 http://about.me/carlosrovira
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Andrew Wetmore
>>> 
>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Wetmore
> 
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ 

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Andrew Wetmore]

@Harbs: thank you!

Slight setback on the Wikipedia page: I was about 80% done creating it in
the Wikipedia sandbox, stepped away to do other things for a couple of
hours, Windows did an update and all my work was lost (the sandbox does not
seem to have a "save" function). When I am done swearing and kicking
things, I will rebuild it, more quickly the second time, so it should be
ready to go live sometime this weekend.

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:11 AM Harbs  wrote:

> Here’s one:
> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php <
> https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php>
>
> > On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> >
> > I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do we
> have
> > links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they
> internal
> > company apps?
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
> >>
> >> El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore ( >)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >>> I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active enough to
> >> avoid
> >>> close scrutiny of what I write.
> >>>
> >>> The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
> >> particular
> >>> characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
> >> published,
> >>> we can work on improving it.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Andrew,
> 
>  what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
> >> Royale?
>  Then we can link from the website.
> 
>  I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your writing
> >> and
>  editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
> 
>  Let us know what you think! :)
> 
>  Thank you
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Carlos Rovira
>  http://about.me/carlosrovira
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>>
> >>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
>

-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Andrew,

By saying that:

"If I am starting from the help
docs I do not want the window to suddenly be focusing on something else; I
would prefer a new window to appear with whatever I clicked on so I can go
back to the first window easily and continue my studies."

Do you mean when you are being in doc [1] - above apply on anything what
you click inside text - Am I right ? Above new window rule do not apply
when you navigating trough menu on the right sight in doc [1]?

[1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 17 maj 2019 o 12:12 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):

> I agree with @Piotr that context is key. If I am starting from the help
> docs I do not want the window to suddenly be focusing on something else; I
> would prefer a new window to appear with whatever I clicked on so I can go
> back to the first window easily and continue my studies. Similarly, if my
> context is the website, then I am thinking about the get-started stuff as
> part of the website, and I am happy for the material I click on to take
> over the current screen.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:23 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
>
> > Let's see whether Andrew have different thoughts. He is an expert in case
> > of documentation ;) Adrian is working on 1 or 2 small pull requests more.
> > ;)
> >
> > pt., 17 maj 2019 o 10:11 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Ok Piotr,
> > >
> > > so I think we have all set as you said, and we just need to worry about
> > the
> > > content created to follow that guidelines
> > >
> > > :)
> > >
> > > El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 10:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > In my opinion it depends where you are clicking on Get Started. If
> you
> > > are
> > > > clicking on Get Started on main page (main menu or footer) you should
> > > stay
> > > > in the same window. I think it should be true for whatever option in
> > main
> > > > menu you are clicking.
> > > >
> > > > However if you are in Docs already and click on "Apache Royale
> > > > Documentation
> > > > " - it would can go to
> separate
> > > > window where you can easy navigate.
> > > >
> > > > My 2 cents ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > pt., 17 maj 2019 o 09:59 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > >
> > > > > ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in
> its
> > > own
> > > > > window. That's ok for me too.
> > > > >
> > > > > What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is
> in
> > > > > website, but goes to royale docs
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > > cottag...@gmail.com
> > > > >)
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside
> of
> > > > Royale
> > > > > > docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it to
> > > open
> > > > > in a
> > > > > > new window rather than taking over the window I am using to read
> > the
> > > > > docs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Adrian,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you
> think
> > > it
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > point to other page.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them that
> > > > refers
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > > > > > > We talked about this when launched the website: In the website
> we
> > > put
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to
> the
> > > site
> > > > > > load
> > > > > > > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for Royale-docs.
> > We
> > > > just
> > > > > > > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the
> same
> > > > page.
> > > > > > For
> > > > > > > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page
> while
> > > > > mailing
> > > > > > > list info will load in the current one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > > > >)
> > > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I tried various plugin solutions for WP and no one seems to
> fit
> > > > what
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > need. So I changed the url to the docs page as suggested.
> Going
> > > to
> > > > > > > publish
> > > > > > > > the site.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I see the styles in headers and other things are not matching
> > the
> > > > > site
> > > > > > > > styles. I'll try to fix that soon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Andrew Wetmore]

I agree with @Piotr that context is key. If I am starting from the help
docs I do not want the window to suddenly be focusing on something else; I
would prefer a new window to appear with whatever I clicked on so I can go
back to the first window easily and continue my studies. Similarly, if my
context is the website, then I am thinking about the get-started stuff as
part of the website, and I am happy for the material I click on to take
over the current screen.

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:23 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Let's see whether Andrew have different thoughts. He is an expert in case
> of documentation ;) Adrian is working on 1 or 2 small pull requests more.
> ;)
>
> pt., 17 maj 2019 o 10:11 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Ok Piotr,
> >
> > so I think we have all set as you said, and we just need to worry about
> the
> > content created to follow that guidelines
> >
> > :)
> >
> > El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 10:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > In my opinion it depends where you are clicking on Get Started. If you
> > are
> > > clicking on Get Started on main page (main menu or footer) you should
> > stay
> > > in the same window. I think it should be true for whatever option in
> main
> > > menu you are clicking.
> > >
> > > However if you are in Docs already and click on "Apache Royale
> > > Documentation
> > > " - it would can go to separate
> > > window where you can easy navigate.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents ;)
> > >
> > >
> > > pt., 17 maj 2019 o 09:59 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in its
> > own
> > > > window. That's ok for me too.
> > > >
> > > > What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is in
> > > > website, but goes to royale docs
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > cottag...@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside of
> > > Royale
> > > > > docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it to
> > open
> > > > in a
> > > > > new window rather than taking over the window I am using to read
> the
> > > > docs.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Adrian,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you think
> > it
> > > > > should
> > > > > > point to other page.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them that
> > > refers
> > > > to
> > > > > > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > > > > > We talked about this when launched the website: In the website we
> > put
> > > > all
> > > > > > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to the
> > site
> > > > > load
> > > > > > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for Royale-docs.
> We
> > > just
> > > > > > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the same
> > > page.
> > > > > For
> > > > > > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page while
> > > > mailing
> > > > > > list info will load in the current one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > > >)
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tried various plugin solutions for WP and no one seems to fit
> > > what
> > > > we
> > > > > > > need. So I changed the url to the docs page as suggested. Going
> > to
> > > > > > publish
> > > > > > > the site.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I see the styles in headers and other things are not matching
> the
> > > > site
> > > > > > > styles. I'll try to fix that soon.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 10:42, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi, I'm looking into this now: How to make website render the
> > > > content
> > > > > of
> > > > > > >> a GitHub page.
> > > > > > >> About Menu I'll change to "Get Started" as Piotr suggested
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> El mié., 15 may. 2019 a las 11:05, Adrian Szuszkiewicz (<
> > > > > > >> adrianszuszkiew...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> My pull request
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> #17: Move Getting Started to Docs
> > > > > > >>> URL: https://github.com/apache/royale-docs/pull/17
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> has just been merged. Now I would like to ask someone with
> > > > WordPress
> > > > > > >>> access
> > > > > > >>> to change the link on header's "GET STARTED" button 

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Let's see whether Andrew have different thoughts. He is an expert in case
of documentation ;) Adrian is working on 1 or 2 small pull requests more.
;)

pt., 17 maj 2019 o 10:11 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Ok Piotr,
>
> so I think we have all set as you said, and we just need to worry about the
> content created to follow that guidelines
>
> :)
>
> El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 10:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > In my opinion it depends where you are clicking on Get Started. If you
> are
> > clicking on Get Started on main page (main menu or footer) you should
> stay
> > in the same window. I think it should be true for whatever option in main
> > menu you are clicking.
> >
> > However if you are in Docs already and click on "Apache Royale
> > Documentation
> > " - it would can go to separate
> > window where you can easy navigate.
> >
> > My 2 cents ;)
> >
> >
> > pt., 17 maj 2019 o 09:59 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in its
> own
> > > window. That's ok for me too.
> > >
> > > What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is in
> > > website, but goes to royale docs
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore (<
> cottag...@gmail.com
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside of
> > Royale
> > > > docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it to
> open
> > > in a
> > > > new window rather than taking over the window I am using to read the
> > > docs.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Adrian,
> > > > >
> > > > > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> > > > >
> > > > > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you think
> it
> > > > should
> > > > > point to other page.
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them that
> > refers
> > > to
> > > > > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > > > > We talked about this when launched the website: In the website we
> put
> > > all
> > > > > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to the
> site
> > > > load
> > > > > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for Royale-docs. We
> > just
> > > > > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the same
> > page.
> > > > For
> > > > > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page while
> > > mailing
> > > > > list info will load in the current one.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > >)
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried various plugin solutions for WP and no one seems to fit
> > what
> > > we
> > > > > > need. So I changed the url to the docs page as suggested. Going
> to
> > > > > publish
> > > > > > the site.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see the styles in headers and other things are not matching the
> > > site
> > > > > > styles. I'll try to fix that soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 10:42, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi, I'm looking into this now: How to make website render the
> > > content
> > > > of
> > > > > >> a GitHub page.
> > > > > >> About Menu I'll change to "Get Started" as Piotr suggested
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> El mié., 15 may. 2019 a las 11:05, Adrian Szuszkiewicz (<
> > > > > >> adrianszuszkiew...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> My pull request
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> #17: Move Getting Started to Docs
> > > > > >>> URL: https://github.com/apache/royale-docs/pull/17
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> has just been merged. Now I would like to ask someone with
> > > WordPress
> > > > > >>> access
> > > > > >>> to change the link on header's "GET STARTED" button and
> footer's
> > > > > "Getting
> > > > > >>> Started"
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> from: https://royale.apache.org/getting-started/
> > > > > >>> to: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/Get%20Started.html
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>> Adrian
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> Sent from:
> http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew 

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Carlos Rovira]

Ok Piotr,

so I think we have all set as you said, and we just need to worry about the
content created to follow that guidelines

:)

El vie., 17 may. 2019 a las 10:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> In my opinion it depends where you are clicking on Get Started. If you are
> clicking on Get Started on main page (main menu or footer) you should stay
> in the same window. I think it should be true for whatever option in main
> menu you are clicking.
>
> However if you are in Docs already and click on "Apache Royale
> Documentation
> " - it would can go to separate
> window where you can easy navigate.
>
> My 2 cents ;)
>
>
> pt., 17 maj 2019 o 09:59 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in its own
> > window. That's ok for me too.
> >
> > What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is in
> > website, but goes to royale docs
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore ( >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside of
> Royale
> > > docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it to open
> > in a
> > > new window rather than taking over the window I am using to read the
> > docs.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Adrian,
> > > >
> > > > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> > > >
> > > > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you think it
> > > should
> > > > point to other page.
> > > >
> > > > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them that
> refers
> > to
> > > > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > > > We talked about this when launched the website: In the website we put
> > all
> > > > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to the site
> > > load
> > > > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for Royale-docs. We
> just
> > > > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the same
> page.
> > > For
> > > > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page while
> > mailing
> > > > list info will load in the current one.
> > > >
> > > > thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried various plugin solutions for WP and no one seems to fit
> what
> > we
> > > > > need. So I changed the url to the docs page as suggested. Going to
> > > > publish
> > > > > the site.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see the styles in headers and other things are not matching the
> > site
> > > > > styles. I'll try to fix that soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 10:42, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, I'm looking into this now: How to make website render the
> > content
> > > of
> > > > >> a GitHub page.
> > > > >> About Menu I'll change to "Get Started" as Piotr suggested
> > > > >>
> > > > >> El mié., 15 may. 2019 a las 11:05, Adrian Szuszkiewicz (<
> > > > >> adrianszuszkiew...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> My pull request
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> #17: Move Getting Started to Docs
> > > > >>> URL: https://github.com/apache/royale-docs/pull/17
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> has just been merged. Now I would like to ask someone with
> > WordPress
> > > > >>> access
> > > > >>> to change the link on header's "GET STARTED" button and footer's
> > > > "Getting
> > > > >>> Started"
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> from: https://royale.apache.org/getting-started/
> > > > >>> to: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/Get%20Started.html
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> Adrian
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Carlos Rovira
> > > > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Piotr Zarzycki]

In my opinion it depends where you are clicking on Get Started. If you are
clicking on Get Started on main page (main menu or footer) you should stay
in the same window. I think it should be true for whatever option in main
menu you are clicking.

However if you are in Docs already and click on "Apache Royale Documentation
" - it would can go to separate
window where you can easy navigate.

My 2 cents ;)


pt., 17 maj 2019 o 09:59 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Hi Andrew,
>
> ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in its own
> window. That's ok for me too.
>
> What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is in
> website, but goes to royale docs
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
> > I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside of Royale
> > docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it to open
> in a
> > new window rather than taking over the window I am using to read the
> docs.
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Adrian,
> > >
> > > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> > >
> > > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you think it
> > should
> > > point to other page.
> > >
> > > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them that refers
> to
> > > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > > We talked about this when launched the website: In the website we put
> all
> > > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to the site
> > load
> > > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for Royale-docs. We just
> > > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the same page.
> > For
> > > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page while
> mailing
> > > list info will load in the current one.
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I tried various plugin solutions for WP and no one seems to fit what
> we
> > > > need. So I changed the url to the docs page as suggested. Going to
> > > publish
> > > > the site.
> > > >
> > > > I see the styles in headers and other things are not matching the
> site
> > > > styles. I'll try to fix that soon.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 10:42, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, I'm looking into this now: How to make website render the
> content
> > of
> > > >> a GitHub page.
> > > >> About Menu I'll change to "Get Started" as Piotr suggested
> > > >>
> > > >> El mié., 15 may. 2019 a las 11:05, Adrian Szuszkiewicz (<
> > > >> adrianszuszkiew...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >>
> > > >>> My pull request
> > > >>>
> > > >>> #17: Move Getting Started to Docs
> > > >>> URL: https://github.com/apache/royale-docs/pull/17
> > > >>>
> > > >>> has just been merged. Now I would like to ask someone with
> WordPress
> > > >>> access
> > > >>> to change the link on header's "GET STARTED" button and footer's
> > > "Getting
> > > >>> Started"
> > > >>>
> > > >>> from: https://royale.apache.org/getting-started/
> > > >>> to: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/Get%20Started.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Adrian
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Carlos Rovira
> > > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: Royale Docs Changes Proposal

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Andrew,

ok, so website navigation happens on the same window and docs in its own
window. That's ok for me too.

What to do with the case of pages like "Get Started"? The link is in
website, but goes to royale docs

thanks



El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:41, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> I think "target=_blank" should be for links to location outside of Royale
> docs. To me, that includes the Royale website. I would want it to open in a
> new window rather than taking over the window I am using to read the docs.
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 7:11 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > I read the Get Started page. Good work! :)
> >
> > just added a link that I think was missed, change it if you think it
> should
> > point to other page.
> >
> > I want to ask about the links strategy. I see some of them that refers to
> > the same Royale-docs part has target blank while other not.
> > We talked about this when launched the website: In the website we put all
> > links to be loaded on the same page, while external links to the site
> load
> > in a blank page. I think we should do the same for Royale-docs. We just
> > need to consider if website and Royale-docs must load in the same page.
> For
> > example in website, a link to NPM will load in another page while mailing
> > list info will load in the current one.
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 11:07, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I tried various plugin solutions for WP and no one seems to fit what we
> > > need. So I changed the url to the docs page as suggested. Going to
> > publish
> > > the site.
> > >
> > > I see the styles in headers and other things are not matching the site
> > > styles. I'll try to fix that soon.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 10:42, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > >> Hi, I'm looking into this now: How to make website render the content
> of
> > >> a GitHub page.
> > >> About Menu I'll change to "Get Started" as Piotr suggested
> > >>
> > >> El mié., 15 may. 2019 a las 11:05, Adrian Szuszkiewicz (<
> > >> adrianszuszkiew...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >>
> > >>> My pull request
> > >>>
> > >>> #17: Move Getting Started to Docs
> > >>> URL: https://github.com/apache/royale-docs/pull/17
> > >>>
> > >>> has just been merged. Now I would like to ask someone with WordPress
> > >>> access
> > >>> to change the link on header's "GET STARTED" button and footer's
> > "Getting
> > >>> Started"
> > >>>
> > >>> from: https://royale.apache.org/getting-started/
> > >>> to: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/Get%20Started.html
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Adrian
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Carlos Rovira
> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: About having an Apache Royale page on Wikipedia

[Harbs]

Here’s one:
https://marketinginflection.com/printui-demo.php 


> On May 17, 2019, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> 
> I believe there are a couple of live applications using Royale. Do we have
> links to them I could reference on the Wikipedia page, or are they internal
> company apps?
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:28 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> 
>> Great Andrew! Thanks! :)
>> 
>> El jue., 16 may. 2019 a las 20:23, Andrew Wetmore ()
>> escribió:
>> 
>>> I can do that! I am a Wikipedia editor, although not active enough to
>> avoid
>>> close scrutiny of what I write.
>>> 
>>> The article will outline the origins, purpose, development, and
>> particular
>>> characteristics of Royale. Once I have the first version up and
>> published,
>>> we can work on improving it.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM Carlos Rovira 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Andrew,
 
 what do you think about to create a page in Wikipedia for Apache
>> Royale?
 Then we can link from the website.
 
 I think that's a task where you can help a lot and where your writing
>> and
 editing skills will be most needed that any other skills.
 
 Let us know what you think! :)
 
 Thank you
 
 
 
 --
 Carlos Rovira
 http://about.me/carlosrovira
 
 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Andrew Wetmore
>>> 
>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Wetmore
> 
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/