Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Thanks
From: cont...@cristallium.com
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 1:02 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi all,
If it may help : I have just downloaded 0.9.10 RC4
run "ant all" and set "y" for the question "Do you want to install the
designmodo fonts? (y, [n])"
=> Compilation is fine :
all:
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 10 minutes 5 seconds
Then I launch VisualStudio at
"0.9.10-rc4\royale-asjs\examples\jewel\TourDeJewel" folder
Add .vscode folder with launch.json,settings.json,tasks.json, then set
SDK to 0.9.10 RC4 and run compilation, all seems OK :
MXMLJSC
+royalelib=d:\dev\Royale\0.9.10-rc4\royale-asjs\frameworks
--debug=true
+configname=royale
--targets=JSRoyale
--source-path+=src/main/resources
--source-map=true
--html-template=src/main/resources/jewel-example-index-template.html
--theme=${royalelib}/themes/JewelTheme/src/main/resources/defaults.css
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true
--
src/main/royale/App.mxml
The project 'App' has been successfully compiled.
15.5849618 seconds
* Terminal will be reused by tasks, press any key to close it.
Le 2023-05-12 11:13, Maria Jose Esteve a écrit :
> Yes, I understand that, but "until now" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, even if I
> hadn't changed the sass file, defaults.css files were generated and
> "apparently" they were different because it presented them to me to
> upload them to the repo. This has happened to me in every SDK build
> since I included the "option-with-sass-compile" profile.
>
> I just wanted to give you some explanation for this behavior.
>
> By the way,... forgive me if this is a simple question... I compile TDJ
> fine, I don't see errors what are those errors you are talking about in
> the previous emails? 😝
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-
> De: Yishay Weiss
> Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12
> Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files
> won't change either.
> ____________
> From: Maria Jose Esteve
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as
> "modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed
> in the compilation scripts?
>
> Let me explain a little more...
> Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were
> generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I
> have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files
> are not presented as modified
>
> Does this happen to anyone else?
> This is my Maven compile statement [1]
>
> [1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P
> option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true
>
> Hiedra
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de
> mayo de 2023 17:21
> Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
>> The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the
>> changes in TDJ build.
>
> Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other
> necessary changes.
>
> From: Yishay Weiss
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the
> changes in TDJ build.
>
> From: Yishay Weiss
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> Hi Maria,
>
> After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that
> there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in
> 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and
> e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
>
> I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack
> of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the
> defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I
> guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That
> includes css files for themes and for TDJ.
>
> I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way
> build sass with ant.
>
> Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build
> our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a
> priority, a
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Makes sense. From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 2:45 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I think I have a suspicion why now the generated files, when I compile Theme, don't have any difference with the ones in the repo... Could it be that the last changes with line feeds and carriage returns MAC/LINUX/WIN had something? what to see? This would make sense to me... Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Maria Jose Esteve Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 11:13 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I understand that, but "until now" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, even if I hadn't changed the sass file, defaults.css files were generated and "apparently" they were different because it presented them to me to upload them to the repo. This has happened to me in every SDK build since I included the "option-with-sass-compile" profile. I just wanted to give you some explanation for this behavior. By the way,... forgive me if this is a simple question... I compile TDJ fine, I don't see errors what are those errors you are talking about in the previous emails? 😝 Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files won't change either. From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as "modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed in the compilation scripts? Let me explain a little more... Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files are not presented as modified Does this happen to anyone else? This is my Maven compile statement [1] [1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 17:21 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 >The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes >in TDJ build. Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other necessary changes. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in TDJ build. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hi Maria, After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ. I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build sass with ant. Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher. If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll start another RC after that. Thanks [1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java (github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com ________ From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my system. In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise. On the ot
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I think I have a suspicion why now the generated files, when I compile Theme, don't have any difference with the ones in the repo... Could it be that the last changes with line feeds and carriage returns MAC/LINUX/WIN had something? what to see? This would make sense to me... Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Maria Jose Esteve Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 11:13 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I understand that, but "until now" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, even if I hadn't changed the sass file, defaults.css files were generated and "apparently" they were different because it presented them to me to upload them to the repo. This has happened to me in every SDK build since I included the "option-with-sass-compile" profile. I just wanted to give you some explanation for this behavior. By the way,... forgive me if this is a simple question... I compile TDJ fine, I don't see errors what are those errors you are talking about in the previous emails? 😝 Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files won't change either. From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as "modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed in the compilation scripts? Let me explain a little more... Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files are not presented as modified Does this happen to anyone else? This is my Maven compile statement [1] [1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 17:21 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 >The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes >in TDJ build. Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other necessary changes. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in TDJ build. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hi Maria, After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ. I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build sass with ant. Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher. If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll start another RC after that. Thanks [1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java (github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com ________ From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my system. In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise. On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can fix it. I do it in the develop
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi all,
If it may help : I have just downloaded 0.9.10 RC4
run "ant all" and set "y" for the question "Do you want to install the
designmodo fonts? (y, [n])"
=> Compilation is fine :
all:
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 10 minutes 5 seconds
Then I launch VisualStudio at
"0.9.10-rc4\royale-asjs\examples\jewel\TourDeJewel" folder
Add .vscode folder with launch.json,settings.json,tasks.json, then set
SDK to 0.9.10 RC4 and run compilation, all seems OK :
MXMLJSC
+royalelib=d:\dev\Royale\0.9.10-rc4\royale-asjs\frameworks
--debug=true
+configname=royale
--targets=JSRoyale
--source-path+=src/main/resources
--source-map=true
--html-template=src/main/resources/jewel-example-index-template.html
--theme=${royalelib}/themes/JewelTheme/src/main/resources/defaults.css
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true
--
src/main/royale/App.mxml
The project 'App' has been successfully compiled.
15.5849618 seconds
* Terminal will be reused by tasks, press any key to close it.
Le 2023-05-12 11:13, Maria Jose Esteve a écrit :
Yes, I understand that, but "until now" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, even if I
hadn't changed the sass file, defaults.css files were generated and
"apparently" they were different because it presented them to me to
upload them to the repo. This has happened to me in every SDK build
since I included the "option-with-sass-compile" profile.
I just wanted to give you some explanation for this behavior.
By the way,... forgive me if this is a simple question... I compile TDJ
fine, I don't see errors what are those errors you are talking about in
the previous emails? 😝
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files
won't change either.
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as
"modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed
in the compilation scripts?
Let me explain a little more...
Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were
generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I
have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files
are not presented as modified
Does this happen to anyone else?
This is my Maven compile statement [1]
[1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P
option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de
mayo de 2023 17:21
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the
changes in TDJ build.
Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other
necessary changes.
____________________
From: Yishay Weiss
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the
changes in TDJ build.
____________________
From: Yishay Weiss
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi Maria,
After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that
there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in
33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and
e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack
of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the
defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I
guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That
includes css files for themes and for TDJ.
I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way
build sass with ant.
Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build
our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a
priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher.
If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev
and I'll start another RC after that.
Thanks
[1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java
(github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
[https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for
Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java dev
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Yes, I understand that, but "until now" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, even if I hadn't changed the sass file, defaults.css files were generated and "apparently" they were different because it presented them to me to upload them to the repo. This has happened to me in every SDK build since I included the "option-with-sass-compile" profile. I just wanted to give you some explanation for this behavior. By the way,... forgive me if this is a simple question... I compile TDJ fine, I don't see errors what are those errors you are talking about in the previous emails? 😝 Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files won't change either. From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as "modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed in the compilation scripts? Let me explain a little more... Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files are not presented as modified Does this happen to anyone else? This is my Maven compile statement [1] [1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 17:21 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 >The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes >in TDJ build. Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other necessary changes. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in TDJ build. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hi Maria, After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ. I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build sass with ant. Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher. If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll start another RC after that. Thanks [1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java (github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com ________ From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my system. In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise. On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can fix it. I do it in the develop branch right? Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for the TDJ fail). ________________ From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Re
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files won't change either. From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as "modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed in the compilation scripts? Let me explain a little more... Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files are not presented as modified Does this happen to anyone else? This is my Maven compile statement [1] [1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 17:21 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 >The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes >in TDJ build. Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other necessary changes. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in TDJ build. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hi Maria, After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ. I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build sass with ant. Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher. If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll start another RC after that. Thanks [1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java (github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my system. In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise. On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can fix it. I do it in the develop branch right? Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for the TDJ fail). From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see. Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y" instead). -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the > ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there > was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d > which was o
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I am compiling Theme but the generated files are not showing up as "modified" so I can upload them to the repo has something changed in the compilation scripts? Let me explain a little more... Until now, ALWAYS when I compiled the SDK, the defaults.css files were generated, and I could see them in the "github desktop" as modified. I have not changed anything in my compilation bat but, now, these files are not presented as modified Does this happen to anyone else? This is my Maven compile statement [1] [1] mvn clean install -DskipTests -P option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 17:21 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 >The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes >in TDJ build. Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other necessary changes. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in TDJ build. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hi Maria, After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ. I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build sass with ant. Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher. If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll start another RC after that. Thanks [1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java (github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my system. In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise. On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can fix it. I do it in the develop branch right? Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for the TDJ fail). From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see. Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y" instead). -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the > ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there > was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d > which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ > test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been > built previously or I was running it from a different directory. > Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes >in TDJ build. Locally, I'm waiting for Maria to make the commits, perhaps with other necessary changes. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 6:19 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in TDJ build. From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hi Maria, After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in 33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ. I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build sass with ant. Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher. If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll start another RC after that. Thanks [1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java (github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java> Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my system. In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise. On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can fix it. I do it in the develop branch right? Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for the TDJ fail). From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see. Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y" instead). -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the > ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there > was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d > which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ > test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been > built previously or I was running it from a different directory. > Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr. > > I do think we should consider whether this type of regression > necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think? > > Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being > obligatory? > ________________ > From: Josh Tynjala > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 > > I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't > be able to vote +1 for this RC. > > Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the > basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml > need the dir attribute specified in the element: > > Before: > > > antfile
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in
TDJ build.
From: Yishay Weiss
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi Maria,
After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no
easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in
33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and
e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a
dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being
manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and
copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ.
I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build
sass with ant.
Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own
ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I
would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher.
If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll
start another RC after that.
Thanks
[1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java
(github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
[https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for
Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an
account on GitHub.
github.com
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my
system.
In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise.
On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not
being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can
fix it. I do it in the develop branch right?
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for
the TDJ fail).
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo
de 2023 22:25
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build
continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y"
instead).
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the
> ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there
> was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
> which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ
> test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been
> built previously or I was running it from a different directory.
> Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression
> necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
> ________________
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't
> be able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the
> basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml
> need the dir attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi Maria,
After trying to fix this myself I have come to the conclusion that there is no
easy fix and we just need to revert the changes you made in
33a58b54da69d2e10fb69782a51dfbc6fdeed628 and
e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
I now recall that Carlos never enabled theme building in ant for lack of a
dedicated task. The log history shows that instead, the defaults.css were being
manually updated after each sass change (I guess by running the mvn build) and
copying the output to src. That includes css files for themes and for TDJ.
I suggest we continue operating in that way until we find a decent way build
sass with ant.
Maybe with this Apache licensed Java solution [1] we can one day build our own
ant task and use it in our build. However, I doubt that's a priority, and I
would only consider doing it for 0.9.11 or higher.
If you agree with this, feel free to revert your said changes on dev and I'll
start another RC after that.
Thanks
[1] cathive/sass-java: Libsass for Java
(github.com)<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
[https://opengraph.githubassets.com/58ec07301dcc16ec89377a755fa4f204342b52fb5ca2c58285d8accff5ca06b1/cathive/sass-java]<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
GitHub - cathive/sass-java: Libsass for
Java<https://github.com/cathive/sass-java>
Libsass for Java. Contribute to cathive/sass-java development by creating an
account on GitHub.
github.com
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my
system.
In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise.
On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not
being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can
fix it. I do it in the develop branch right?
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for
the TDJ fail).
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo
de 2023 22:25
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build
continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y"
instead).
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the
> ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there
> was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
> which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ
> test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been
> built previously or I was running it from a different directory.
> Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression
> necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
> ________________
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't
> be able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the
> basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml
> need the dir attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my
system.
In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise.
On the other hand, I have seen that the compilation of the Jewel Themes are not
being done, there are errors, I will look at it this afternoon to see if I can
fix it. I do it in the develop branch right?
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for
the TDJ fail).
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo
de 2023 22:25
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build
continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y"
instead).
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the
> ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there
> was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
> which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ
> test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been
> built previously or I was running it from a different directory.
> Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression
> necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
> ________
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't
> be able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the
> basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml
> need the dir attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
> blocker.
> >
> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
> > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
> >
> > compile:
> >
> > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> > ROYALE_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js
> >
> > args:
> >
> >
> >
> +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/roy
> +ale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks
> >
> > +playerglobal.version=11.1
> >
> >
> >
> +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/
> +royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > -compiler.strict-xml=true
> >
> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoy
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for
the TDJ fail).
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Josh Tynjala
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build
continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y"
instead).
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the
> ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there
> was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
> which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ
> test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been
> built previously or I was running it from a different directory.
> Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression
> necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
>
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't
> be able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the
> basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml
> need the dir attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
> blocker.
> >
> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
> > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
> >
> > compile:
> >
> > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> > ROYALE_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js
> >
> > args:
> >
> >
> >
> +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/roy
> +ale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks
> >
> > +playerglobal.version=11.1
> >
> >
> >
> +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/
> +royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > -compiler.strict-xml=true
> >
> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> >
> >
> >
> -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale
> _vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/
> target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> >
> >
> -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/r
> oyale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJ
> ewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/Moon
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
These [1] are the CI jobs we currently have running regularly. We should
probably have an additional one for compiling and running all examples, which
is what has been failing in approval script. At least I can see that MXTests
and Royale_ASDoc_Example are successful which has been a sore point in previous
releases.
With the current release frequency, I agree we should be careful with releasing
regression. So I'll try to fix TDJ ant and put up another RC.
Thanks
[1] Dashboard [Jenkins]
(azure.com)<http://apacheroyale.francecentral.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/>
From: Josh Tynjala
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 11:03 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
While I was having lunch, I thought of another reason why I'm not inclined
to vote for a build where the approval script doesn't pass.
In the past, sometimes, the Royale CI server went over a week at a time
with no successful builds. We're much better about fixing it quickly these
days. Back then, on multiple occasions, I took on the effort to fix it, and
after taking care of the original issue, I discovered that the build was
still broken. I turned out that later commits had issues too, and no one
noticed because the build was already failing.
With the approval script, I worry that an issue may not get fixed after we
release, and then, when the next release rolls around, we have to again
choose whether to fix it or not. So it might get delayed again. If that
happens, we won't know if additional issues are building up behind the
original one, which makes it even harder to fix the approval script, and we
may end up missing more serious issues that the approval script could have
caught for us.
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:22 PM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> I'm inclined to vote -1 if the approval script ever fails on an RC. I
> could be convinced to vote 0 at best, if I'm feeling particularly confident
> about everything else. It just feels to me like the script should be able
> to pass as a bare minimum. Maybe if it were easy to skip the part that
> fails and continue to the end, but I hate to be left wondering if there
> were additional issues after the one that caused the failure.
>
> I'll check the designmodo requirement later today.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
>> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the ant
>> script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there was
>> likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d which was
>> one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ test was
>> successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been built
>> previously or I was running it from a different directory. Anyway, I'll try
>> to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>>
>> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression necessarily
>> implies no release. What do other folks think?
>>
>> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
>> obligatory?
>>
>> From: Josh Tynjala
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>>
>> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be
>> able to vote +1 for this RC.
>>
>> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir,
>> I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir
>> attribute specified in the element:
>>
>> Before:
>>
>> >
>> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>>
>> After:
>>
>> > dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>>
>> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>>
>> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
>> blocker.
>> >
>> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
>> > To: dev@royale.apache
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Josh Tynjala
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build
continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y"
instead).
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the
> ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there
> was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d
> which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ
> test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been
> built previously or I was running it from a different directory.
> Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression
> necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
>
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't
> be able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the
> basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml
> need the dir attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Empha
> sized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
> blocker.
> >
> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
> > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
> >
> > compile:
> >
> > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> > ROYALE_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ap
> ache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js
> >
> > args:
> >
> >
> >
> +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/roy
> +ale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks
> >
> > +playerglobal.version=11.1
> >
> >
> >
> +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/
> +royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > -compiler.strict-xml=true
> >
> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> >
> >
> >
> -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale
> _vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/
> target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> >
> >
> -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/r
> oyale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJ
> ewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SD
> K/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-confi
> g.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_S
> -js-load-config+DK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royal
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the
build continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer
"y" instead).
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the ant
> script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there was
> likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d which was
> one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ test was
> successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been built
> previously or I was running it from a different directory. Anyway, I'll try
> to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression necessarily
> implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
>
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be
> able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir,
> I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir
> attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
> blocker.
> >
> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
> > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
> >
> > compile:
> >
> > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> > ROYALE_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js
> >
> > args:
> >
> >
> >
> +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks
> >
> > +playerglobal.version=11.1
> >
> >
> >
> +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > -compiler.strict-xml=true
> >
> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> >
> >
> >
> -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> >
> >
> -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/../../js/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-ThemeJS/src/main/config/compile-js-config.xml
> >
> > 0.225995245 seconds
> >
> > command line unable to open
> >
> >
> '/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/exampl
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
While I was having lunch, I thought of another reason why I'm not inclined
to vote for a build where the approval script doesn't pass.
In the past, sometimes, the Royale CI server went over a week at a time
with no successful builds. We're much better about fixing it quickly these
days. Back then, on multiple occasions, I took on the effort to fix it, and
after taking care of the original issue, I discovered that the build was
still broken. I turned out that later commits had issues too, and no one
noticed because the build was already failing.
With the approval script, I worry that an issue may not get fixed after we
release, and then, when the next release rolls around, we have to again
choose whether to fix it or not. So it might get delayed again. If that
happens, we won't know if additional issues are building up behind the
original one, which makes it even harder to fix the approval script, and we
may end up missing more serious issues that the approval script could have
caught for us.
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:22 PM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> I'm inclined to vote -1 if the approval script ever fails on an RC. I
> could be convinced to vote 0 at best, if I'm feeling particularly confident
> about everything else. It just feels to me like the script should be able
> to pass as a bare minimum. Maybe if it were easy to skip the part that
> fails and continue to the end, but I hate to be left wondering if there
> were additional issues after the one that caused the failure.
>
> I'll check the designmodo requirement later today.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
>> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the ant
>> script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there was
>> likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d which was
>> one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ test was
>> successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been built
>> previously or I was running it from a different directory. Anyway, I'll try
>> to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>>
>> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression necessarily
>> implies no release. What do other folks think?
>>
>> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
>> obligatory?
>>
>> From: Josh Tynjala
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>>
>> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be
>> able to vote +1 for this RC.
>>
>> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir,
>> I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir
>> attribute specified in the element:
>>
>> Before:
>>
>> >
>> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>>
>> After:
>>
>> > dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>>
>> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>>
>> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
>> blocker.
>> >
>> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
>> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
>> > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
>> >
>> > compile:
>> >
>> > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
>> >
>> > ROYALE_HOME:
>> >
>> >
>> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
>> >
>> > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME:
>> >
>> >
>> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apac
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I'm inclined to vote -1 if the approval script ever fails on an RC. I could
be convinced to vote 0 at best, if I'm feeling particularly confident about
everything else. It just feels to me like the script should be able to pass
as a bare minimum. Maybe if it were easy to skip the part that fails and
continue to the end, but I hate to be left wondering if there were
additional issues after the one that caused the failure.
I'll check the designmodo requirement later today.
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss
wrote:
> The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the ant
> script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there was
> likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d which was
> one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ test was
> successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been built
> previously or I was running it from a different directory. Anyway, I'll try
> to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr.
>
> I do think we should consider whether this type of regression necessarily
> implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
>
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be
> able to vote +1 for this RC.
>
> Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir,
> I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir
> attribute specified in the element:
>
> Before:
>
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> After:
>
> dir="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme"
>
> antfile="${basedir}/../../../frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml"/>
>
> Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a
> blocker.
> >
> > From: Piotr Zarzycki
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
> > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
> >
> > compile:
> >
> > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> > ROYALE_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> >
> >
> /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js
> >
> > args:
> >
> >
> >
> +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks
> >
> > +playerglobal.version=11.1
> >
> >
> >
> +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs
> >
> > -compiler.strict-xml=true
> >
> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> >
> >
> >
> -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
> >
> >
> >
> -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/../../js/the
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ test was successful before my latest commit. Maybe the themes had been built previously or I was running it from a different directory. Anyway, I'll try to fix that. Thanks for the input, Josh and Piotr. I do think we should consider whether this type of regression necessarily implies no release. What do other folks think? Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being obligatory? From: Josh Tynjala Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be able to vote +1 for this RC. Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir attribute specified in the element: Before: After: Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a blocker. > > From: Piotr Zarzycki > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 > > Hello, > > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf. > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a) > > compile: > > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc > > ROYALE_HOME: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs > > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs > > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js > > args: > > > +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks > > +playerglobal.version=11.1 > > > +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs > > -compiler.strict-xml=true > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale > > > -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc > > > -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml > > > -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-config.xml > > > -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/../../js/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-ThemeJS/src/main/config/compile-js-config.xml > > 0.225995245 seconds > > command line unable to open > > '/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml'. > > > Java Result: 4 > > > compile-js: > > > copy-swc: > > > BUILD FAILED > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ApproveRoyale.xml:795: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:688: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:101: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:45: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:387: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > &g
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be able to vote +1 for this RC. Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir attribute specified in the element: Before: After: Be sure to test it, though. That's just a guess. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:09 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a blocker. > > From: Piotr Zarzycki > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 > > Hello, > > I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf. > Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a) > > compile: > > Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc > > ROYALE_HOME: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs > > ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs > > ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js > > args: > > > +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks > > +playerglobal.version=11.1 > > > +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs > > -compiler.strict-xml=true > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale > > > -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc > > > -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml > > > -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-config.xml > > > -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/../../js/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-ThemeJS/src/main/config/compile-js-config.xml > > 0.225995245 seconds > > command line unable to open > > '/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml'. > > > Java Result: 4 > > > compile-js: > > > copy-swc: > > > BUILD FAILED > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ApproveRoyale.xml:795: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:688: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:101: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:45: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:387: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml:56: > Warning: Could not find file > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc > to copy. > > > > > wt., 9 maj 2023 o 19:21 Yishay Weiss napisał(a): > > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki >
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a blocker. From: Piotr Zarzycki Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hello, I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf. Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a) compile: Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc ROYALE_HOME: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js args: +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks +playerglobal.version=11.1 +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs -compiler.strict-xml=true -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-config.xml -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/../../js/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-ThemeJS/src/main/config/compile-js-config.xml 0.225995245 seconds command line unable to open '/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml'. Java Result: 4 compile-js: copy-swc: BUILD FAILED /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ApproveRoyale.xml:795: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:688: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:101: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:45: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:387: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml:56: Warning: Could not find file /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc to copy. wt., 9 maj 2023 o 19:21 Yishay Weiss napisał(a): > This is the discussion thread. > -- Piotr Zarzycki
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hello, I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf. Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a) compile: Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc ROYALE_HOME: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/js args: +royalelib=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks +playerglobal.version=11.1 +env.AIR_HOME=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs -compiler.strict-xml=true -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale -output=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc -load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml -js-load-config=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/js-config.xml -js-load-config+=/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/../../js/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-ThemeJS/src/main/config/compile-js-config.xml 0.225995245 seconds command line unable to open '/Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml'. Java Result: 4 compile-js: copy-swc: BUILD FAILED /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/ApproveRoyale.xml:795: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:688: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:101: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:45: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/build.xml:387: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/themes/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme/build.xml:56: Warning: Could not find file /Users/piotrzarzycki/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/royale_vote/apache-royale-0.9.10-src/royale-asjs/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc to copy. wt., 9 maj 2023 o 19:21 Yishay Weiss napisał(a): > This is the discussion thread. > -- Piotr Zarzycki
