[Standalone Tiles] Applying patches

2006-07-27 Thread Antonio Petrelli

Hi list!
Thank you all for letting me joining your team, especially Greg Reddin 
that sponsored me.


Now the serious things.
I would like to apply some patches that I have reported some time ago. 
But it seems that I cannot assign myself the issues, probably because I 
have not the right privileges, or probably because I cannot see the 
right link to do it! :-P
Anyway what do I have to do to assign issues myself? My JIRA account 
name is brenmcguire. If it requires some administrator task, well, 
thanks in advance :-)


Speaking of patches, I don't know if I should apply the patch for this 
issue:

http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-28
This is because in part it revolutionize the way Greg intended to manage 
definition creation, in the name of extensibility.


Please let me know what do you think

Ciao
Antonio

P.S.: If you are guessing who brenmcguire is, Google bren mcguire 
and press I'm feeling lucky :-)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Standalone Tiles] Applying patches

2006-07-27 Thread Ted Husted

On 7/27/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

probably because I have not the right privileges


Done.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Standalone Tiles] Applying patches

2006-07-27 Thread Antonio Petrelli

Ted Husted ha scritto:

On 7/27/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

probably because I have not the right privileges


Done.


It works, thank you :-)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [s2] Sping WebFlow Integration

2006-07-27 Thread Eric Molitor

Right now most of my work is on hold until I get moved and up to speed
at my new job. Its been a while but when I tried SWF-76 it worked but
I haven't looked at it recently. My current concentration has been
updating the spring integration but even that's been a bit spotty
lately.

Cheers,
 Eric

On 7/26/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eric Molitor wrote:
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=14251tstart=15A

 At The Spring Experience in Miami Keith Donald,
 Myself, and Matthew Porter worked out a way it could
 be done and it was pretty simple. Once SAF2 starts
 solidifying I'd like to start playing around with
 continuation support again but I'm less interested in
 RIFE's implementation and more interested in SWF's
 implementation. But you also have to consider Beehive
 (ASF) and probably some integration with OSWorkflow.

 I worked up some code that created a WebFlow
 action and diverted processing to SWF but didn't get
 much farther than that. However I believe there is
 code floating around to execute an action as a SWF
  step. YMMV

Are you still working on this, Eric?

Did you give the class Matt mentioned a try?

* http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SWF-76

-Ted.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [Standalone Tiles] Applying patches

2006-07-27 Thread apache
 Speaking of patches, I don't know if I should apply the patch for this 
 issue:
 http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-28
 This is because in part it revolutionize the way Greg intended to manage 
 definition creation, in the name of extensibility.

Hold off on that one please.  I've not had time to look at it yet, but
I'll check on it today if possible.

Thanks,
Greg



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [jira] Updated: (SITE-13) Enable nightly and continuous integration builds

2006-07-27 Thread James Mitchell
No worries.  Now that the nightlies are back online and running  
regularly, I'm going to finish up what I'm working on for the nightly  
download page.  I'd like the nightly build to generate a download  
page that better describes what's available (as opposed to just using  
the simple file listingstay tuned.


Next, I'm going to focus some attention on continuum.  After that,  
I'd like to take a look at getting 1.3.6 fixed up and rolled out.


--
James Mitchell




On Jul 26, 2006, at 6:38 AM, Ted Husted wrote:


I might be able to help more the infrastructure after August 20.
Unfoturnately, most of the time I had set aside this month to work on
s2, went into s1. Now, it will be all I can do to nail down the
examples and documentation. There's still a ton of work to do on that
front, and it also looks like a lot of snippets are failing now.

-Ted.

On 7/26/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

By the way, there's no secret handshake or anything for any committer
to get an account our zone, just ask and I'll hook you right up.

We can pretty much do what we want with it...well, anything inside
the limits of morality and ASF policy.  Here's more info on the  
zones:

  http://apache.org/dev/solaris-zones.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality

2006-07-27 Thread Michael Jouravlev

On 7/23/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The Struts 1.3.5 Test Build is available to evaluate for release quality.

The release plan is available on the wiki:
  * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease135

The test build, including checksums and signatures, has been deployed to:
  * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/

Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:

[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)

Everyone is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered
binding. A vote passes if there are at least three +1s and more +1s
than -1s.

Please remember that a binding +1 for GA implies that you intend to
support the release with patches and posts to the user list.

-Ted.


I just have glanced over distro files, so the nitpicks are minor. I
have no opinion on the grade yet.

Documentation:
--

* Key Technology Primer (former 0.x section of the User's Guide) is
not included in the distro. KTP has been extracted from Struts 1 docs
to cater to both Struts 1 and Struts 2. Included documentation
contains live link to KTP on Apache website. I don't know is it ok or
not.

* Struts Tiles page contains link to itself.

* Struts Tag Reference contains bare listings of tag properties from
TLD file without discription. Yes, Taglibdoc does exist in Javadoc
format, but taglib had tag reference documentation earlier, now it is
not available. This happened quite a while ago, same thing on the live
website.

Cookbook:
-

* Cookbook contains extracted and modified chain-config.xml, the
reason for that is not explained. It has Tiles section added, but
Cookbook does not seem to be using Tiles.

* Current 1.3.5 default chain-config.xml file contains
RemoveCachedMessages command (distro has been patched recently without
increasing version number), Cookbook's extracted file does not have
this entry.

Blank:
--

* struts-config.xml contains mappings that use non-existent classes or
pages. Should they be removed?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality

2006-07-27 Thread Ted Husted

On 7/27/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I just have glanced over distro files, so the nitpicks are minor. I
have no opinion on the grade yet.


As it stands, we have only two other votes as to grade. We need a
quorum of at least three positive votes to proceed. (I'm abstraining
myself.)

I should not that it is helpful for other developers to cast
non-binding votes, to give the PMC a basis to believe that the
distribution is ready for wider distribution. We arleady know the code
works for us. What we need to know is whether it works for other
developers as well.



* Key Technology Primer (former 0.x section of the User's Guide) is
not included in the distro. KTP has been extracted from Struts 1 docs
to cater to both Struts 1 and Struts 2. Included documentation
contains live link to KTP on Apache website. I don't know is it ok or
not.


The material in the Key Technology is not specific to a verson or
Struts (or even Struts), so there's no reason to include it n the
distribution. Better to link to a live version with up to date links.

-Ted.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ApacheCon 2006

2006-07-27 Thread Ted Husted

ApacheCon US has accepted my offer to present a half-day tutorial on
Migrating to Struts 2.

Is anyone else presenting about Struts this year?

-Ted.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]